Search

The Mediator complex is central to transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in eukaryotes. In budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Mediator is recruited by activators and associates with core promoter regions, where it facilitates preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly, only transiently before Pol II escape. Interruption of the transcription cycle by inactivation or depletion of Kin28 inhibits Pol II escape and stabilizes this association. However, Mediator occupancy and dynamics have not been examined on a genome-wide scale in yeast grown in nonstandard conditions. Here we investigate Mediator occupancy following heat shock or CdCl2 exposure, with and without depletion of Kin28. We find that Pol II occupancy shows similar dependence on Mediator under normal and heat shock conditions. However, although Mediator association increases at many genes upon Kin28 depletion under standard growth conditions, little or no increase is observed at most genes upon heat shock, indicating a more stable association of Mediator after heat shock. Unexpectedly, Mediator remains associated upstream of the core promoter at genes repressed by heat shock or CdCl2 exposure whether or not Kin28 is depleted, suggesting that Mediator is recruited by activators but is unable to engage PIC components at these repressed targets. This persistent association is strongest at promoters that bind the HMGB family member Hmo1, and is reduced but not eliminated in hmo1Δ yeast. Finally, we show a reduced dependence on PIC components for Mediator occupancy at promoters after heat shock, further supporting altered dynamics or stronger engagement with activators under these conditions.

The Mediator complex is central to transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in eukaryotes. In yeast, Mediator is recruited by activators via its tail module and then facilitates assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC), including Pol II, setting the stage for productive transcription. Mediator occupies proximal promoter regions only transiently prior to Pol II escape; interruption of the transcription cycle by inactivation or depletion of Kin28 inhibits Pol II escape and stabilizes Mediator occupancy at promoters. However, whether Mediator occupancy and dynamics differ for gene cohorts induced by stress or alternative growth conditions has not been examined on a genome-wide scale. Here we investigate Mediator occupancy following heat shock or CdCl2 induction, with or without depletion of Kin28. We find that Pol II occupancy exhibits similar dependence on Mediator under normal and heat shock conditions; however, Mediator occupancy does not increase upon Kin28 depletion at most genes active during heat shock, indicating altered dynamics. Furthermore, Mediator occupancy persists at genes repressed by heat shock or CdCl2 induction and exhibits peaks upstream of the proximal promoter whether or not Kin28 is depleted, suggesting that Mediator is recruited by activators but is unable to engage PIC components at these repressed targets. Finally, we show a reduced dependence on PIC components for Mediator occupancy at promoters after heat shock, further supporting an altered dynamics or stronger engagement with activators under these conditions.

In eukaryotes, transcription of mRNA-encoding genes by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) begins with assembly of the pre-initiation complex (PIC), comprising Pol II and the general transcription factors. Although the pathway of PIC assembly is well established, the mechanism of assembly and the dynamics of PIC components are not fully understood. For example, only recently has it been shown in yeast that the Mediator complex, which assists in pre-initiation complex formation at promoters of essentially all genes transcribed by Pol II, normally occupies promoters only transiently. This was inferred from studies showing that inhibiting Pol II promoter escape by depleting or inactivating Kin28 resulted in increased promoter occupancy by Mediator, as measured by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Here we show that two subunits of TFIID, Taf1 and Taf4, similarly show increased occupancy as measured by ChIP upon depletion or inactivation of Kin28. In contrast, TBP occupancy is unaffected by depletion of Kin28, thus revealing an uncoupling of Taf and TBP occupancy during the transcription cycle. Increased Taf1 occupancy upon Kin28 depletion is suppressed by depletion of TBP, while depletion of TBP in the presence of Kin28 has little effect on Taf1 occupancy. Taf1 occupancy relative to TBP is higher at TFIID-dominated promoters and promoters having consensus TATA elements than at SAGA-dominated promoters and promoters lacking consensus TATA elements, consistent with prior work, and the increase in Taf occupancy upon depletion of Kin28 is more pronounced at TFIID-dominated promoters. Our results support the suggestion, based on recent structural studies, that TFIID may not remain bound to gene promoters through the transcription initiation cycle.Author SummaryTranscription of mRNA-encoding genes by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) begins when the pre-initiation complex, a large complex comprising Pol II and several general transcription factors, including the TATA-binding protein (TBP)-containing TFIID complex, assembles at gene promoters. Although the major steps in the pathway of PIC assembly have been identified, the mechanism of assembly in vivo and the dynamics of PIC components are not fully understood. In this work we have used a yeast strain that is engineered to allow inhibition of promoter escape by Pol II by administration of a chemical, in order to “freeze” the assembled PIC and thus determine whether this condition increases the promoter occupancy of TBP and two TBP-associated factors (Tafs) that are components of TFIID. This approach was used recently to demonstrate that the Mediator complex, which facilitates PIC assembly, normally binds only transiently to gene promoters. We find that Tafs, like Mediator, show increased occupancy when Pol II promoter escape is inhibited, whereas TBP binding is constant. These results imply that binding of TBP and Tafs is uncoupled during the transcription cycle, and that Taf occupancy is at least partially interrupted upon Pol II promoter escape.

The Mediator complex stimulates the cooperative assembly of a pre-initiation complex (PIC) and recruitment of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) for gene activation. The core Mediator complex is organized into head, middle, and tail modules, and in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Mediator recruitment has generally been ascribed to sequence-specific activators engaging the tail module triad of Med2-Med3-Med15 at upstream activating sequences (UASs). We show that yeast lacking Med2-Med3-Med15 are viable and that Mediator and PolII are recruited to promoters genome-wide in these cells, albeit at reduced levels. To test whether Mediator might alternatively be recruited via interactions with the PIC, we examined Mediator association genome-wide after depleting PIC components. We found that depletion of Taf1, Rpb3, and TBP profoundly affected Mediator association at active gene promoters, with TBP being critical for transit of Mediator from UAS to promoter, while Pol II and Taf1 stabilize Mediator association at proximal promoters.

The ability of isolated neural stem cells (NSCs) to proliferate as neurospheres is indicative of their competence as stem cells, and depends critically on the polycomb group (PcG) member Bmi1: knockdown of Bmi1 results in defective proliferation and self-renewal of isolated NSCs, whereas overexpression of Bmi1 enhances these properties. Here we report genome-wide changes in gene expression in embryonic and adult NSCs (eNSCs and aNSCs) caused by overexpression of Bmi1. We find that genes whose expression is altered by perturbations in Bmi1 levels in NSCs are mostly distinct from those affected in other multipotent stem/progenitor cells, such as those from liver and lung, aside from a small core of common targets that is enriched for genes associated with cell migration and mobility. We also show that genes differing in expression between prospectively isolated quiescent and activated NSCs are not affected by Bmi1 overexpression. In contrast, a comparison of genes showing altered expression upon Bmi1 overexpression in eNSCs and in aNSCs reveals considerable overlap, in spite of their different provenances in the brain and their differing developmental programs.

Previous studies have described a transcriptional “memory effect,” whereby transcript levels of many Abf1-regulated genes in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are undiminished even after Abf1 has dissociated from its regulatory sites. Here we provide additional support for this effect and investigate its molecular basis. We show that the effect is observed in a distinct abf1 ts mutant from that used in earlier studies, demonstrating that it is robust, and use chromatin immunoprecipitation to show that Abf1 association is decreased similarly from memory effect and transcriptionally responsive genes at the restrictive temperature. We also demonstrate that the association of TATA-binding protein and Pol II decreases after the loss of Abf1 binding for transcriptionally responsive genes but not for memory effect genes. Examination of genome-wide nucleosome occupancy data reveals that although transcriptionally responsive genes exhibit increased nucleosome occupancy in abf1 ts yeast, the promoter regions of memory effect targets show no change in abf1 ts mutants, maintaining an open chromatin conformation even after Abf1 eviction. This contrasting behavior reflects different inherent propensity for nucleosome formation between the two classes, driven by the presence of A/T-rich sequences upstream of the Abf1 site in memory effect gene promoters. These sequence-based differences show conservation in closely related fungi and also correlate with different gene expression noise, suggesting a physiological basis for greater access to “memory effect” promoter regions. Thus, our results establish a conserved mechanism underlying a transcriptional memory effect whereby sequences surrounding Abf1 binding sequences affect local nucleosome occupancy following loss of Abf1 binding. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate that sequence-based differences in the propensity for nucleosome occupancy can influence the transcriptional response of genes to an altered regulatory signal.

Mediator is a large, multisubunit complex that is required for essentially all mRNA transcription in eukaryotes. In spite of the importance of Mediator, the range of its targets and how it is recruited to these is not well understood. Previous work showed that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mediator contributes to transcriptional activation by two distinct mechanisms, one depending on the tail module triad and favoring SAGA-regulated genes, and the second occurring independently of the tail module and favoring TFIID-regulated genes. Here, we use chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) to show that dependence on tail module subunits for Mediator recruitment and polymerase II (Pol II) association occurs preferentially at SAGA-regulated over TFIID-regulated genes on a genome-wide scale. We also show that recruitment of tail module subunits to active gene promoters continues genome-wide when Mediator integrity is compromised in med17 temperature-sensitive (ts) yeast, demonstrating the modular nature of the Mediator complex in vivo. In addition, our data indicate that promoters exhibiting strong and stable occupancy by Mediator have a wide range of activity and are enriched for targets of the Tup1-Cyc8 repressor complex. We also identify a number of strong Mediator occupancy peaks that overlap dubious open reading frames (ORFs) and are likely to include previously unrecognized upstream activator sequences.

The Mediator complex functions in eukaryotic transcription by stimulating the cooperative assembly of a pre-initiation complex (PIC) and recruitment of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) for gene activation. The core Mediator complex is organized into head, middle, and tail modules, and in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Mediator recruitment has generally been ascribed to sequence-specific activators engaging the tail module triad of Med2-Med3-Med15 at upstream activating sequences (UASs). We show that med2Δ med3Δ med15Δ yeast are viable and that Mediator lacking Med2-Med3-Med15 is associated with active promoters genome-wide. To test whether Mediator might alternatively be recruited via interactions with the PIC, we examined Mediator association genome-wide after depleting PIC components. We found that depletion of Taf1, Rpb3, and TBP profoundly affected Mediator association at active gene promoters, with TBP being critical for transit of Mediator from UAS to promoter, while Pol II and Taf1 stabilize Mediator association at proximal promoters.

The Ty1 retrotransposons present in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae belong to the large class of mobile genetic elements that replicate via an RNA intermediary and constitute a significant portion of most eukaryotic genomes. The retromobility of Ty1 is regulated by numerous host factors, including several subunits of the Mediator transcriptional co-activator complex. In spite of its known function in the nucleus, previous studies have implicated Mediator in the regulation of post-translational steps in Ty1 retromobility. To resolve this paradox, we systematically examined the effects of deleting non-essential Mediator subunits on the frequency of Ty1 retromobility and levels of retromobility intermediates. Our findings reveal that loss of distinct Mediator subunits alters Ty1 retromobility positively or negatively over a >10,000-fold range by regulating the ratio of an internal transcript, Ty1i, to the genomic Ty1 transcript. Ty1i RNA encodes a dominant negative inhibitor of Ty1 retromobility that blocks virus-like particle maturation and cDNA synthesis. These results resolve the conundrum of Mediator exerting sweeping control of Ty1 retromobility with only minor effects on the levels of Ty1 genomic RNA and the capsid protein, Gag. Since the majority of characterized intrinsic and extrinsic regulators of Ty1 retromobility do not appear to effect genomic Ty1 RNA levels, Mediator could play a central role in integrating signals that influence Ty1i expression to modulate retromobility., Author summary Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that copy their RNA genomes into DNA and insert the DNA copies into the host genome. These elements contribute to genome instability, control of host gene expression and adaptation to changing environments. Retrotransposons depend on numerous host factors for their own propagation and control. The retrovirus-like retrotransposon, Ty1, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been an invaluable model for retrotransposon research, and hundreds of host factors that regulate Ty1 retrotransposition have been identified. Non-essential subunits of the Mediator transcriptional co-activator complex have been identified as one set of host factors implicated in Ty1 regulation. Here, we report a systematic investigation of the effects of loss of these non-essential subunits of Mediator on Ty1 retrotransposition. Our findings reveal a heretofore unknown mechanism by which Mediator influences the balance between transcription from two promoters in Ty1 to modulate expression of an autoinhibitory transcript known as Ty1i RNA. Our results provide new insights into host control of retrotransposon activity via promoter choice and elucidate a novel mechanism by which the Mediator co-activator governs this choice.

Mediator is a large multisubunit complex that plays a central role in the regulation of RNA Pol II transcribed genes. Conserved in overall structure and function among eukaryotes, Mediator comprises 25-30 protein subunits that reside in four distinct modules, termed head, middle, tail, and CDK8/kinase. Different subunits of Mediator contact other transcriptional regulators including activators, co-activators, general transcription factors, subunits of RNA Pol II, and specifically modified histones, leading to the regulated expression of target genes. This review is focused on the interactions of specific Mediator subunits with diverse transcription regulators and how those interactions contribute to Mediator function in transcriptional activation.

The tail module subunits of Mediator complex are targets of activators both in yeast and metazoans. Here we discuss recent evidence from studies in yeast for tail module specificity for SAGA-dependent, TATA-containing genes including highly regulated stress response genes, and for independent recruitment and function of the tail module.

The evolutionarily conserved Mediator complex is required for transcription of nearly all RNA Pol II‐dependent promoters, with the tail module serving to recruit Mediator to active promoters in current models. However, transcriptional dependence on tail module subunits varies in a gene‐specific manner, and the generality of the tail module requirement for transcriptional activation has not been explored. Here, we show that tail module subunits function redundantly to recruit Mediator to promoters in yeast, and transcriptome analysis shows stronger effects on genome‐wide expression in a double‐tail subunit deletion mutant than in single‐subunit deletion mutants. Unexpectedly, TATA‐containing and SAGA‐dependent genes were much more affected by impairment of tail module function than were TFIID‐dependent genes. Consistent with this finding, Mediator and preinitiation complex association with SAGA‐dependent promoters is substantially reduced in gal11/med15 Δ med3 Δ yeast, whereas association of TBP, Pol II, and other Mediator modules with TFIID‐dependent genes is largely independent of the tail module. Thus, we have identified a connection between the Mediator tail module and the division of promoter dependence between TFIID and SAGA.

The histone H3 amino terminus, but not that of H4, is required to prevent the constitutively bound activator Cha4 from remodeling chromatin and activating transcription at the CHA1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Here we show that neither the modifiable lysine residues nor any specific region of the H3 tail is required for repression of CHA1 . We then screened for histone H3 mutations that cause derepression of the uninduced CHA1 promoter and identified six mutants, three of which are also temperature-sensitive mutants and four of which exhibit a sin − phenotype. Histone mutant levels were similar to that of wild-type H3, and the mutations did not cause gross alterations in nucleosome structure. One specific and strongly derepressing mutation, H3 A111G, was examined in depth and found to cause a constitutively active chromatin configuration at the uninduced CHA1 promoter as well as at the ADH2 promoter. Transcriptional derepression and altered chromatin structure of the CHA1 promoter depend on the activator Cha4. These results indicate that modest perturbations in distinct regions of the nucleosome can substantially affect the repressive function of chromatin, allowing activation in the absence of a normal inducing signal (at CHA1 ) or of Swi/Snf (resulting in a sin − phenotype).

Mediator complex is essential for transcription by RNA polymerase II in eukaryotes. Although chromatin remodeling is an integral part of transcriptional activation at many promoters, whether Mediator is required for this function has not been determined. Here we have used the yeast CHA1 gene to study the role of Mediator in chromatin remodeling and recruitment of the transcription machinery. We show by chromatin immunoprecipitation that Mediator subunits are recruited to the induced CHA1 promoter. Inactivation of Mediator at 37 degrees C in yeast harboring the srb4-138 (med17) ts mutation severely reduces CHA1 activation and prevents recruitment to the induced CHA1 promoter of Med18/Srb5, from the head module of Mediator, and Med14/Rgr1, which bridges the middle and tail modules. In contrast, recruitment of Med15/Gal11 from the tail module is unaffected in med17 ts yeast at 37 degrees C. Recruitment of TATA-binding protein (TBP) is severely compromised in the absence of functional Mediator, whereas Kin28 and polymerase II recruitment are reduced but to a lesser extent. Induced levels of histone H3K4me3 at the CHA1 promoter are not diminished by inactivation of Mediator, whereas recruitment of Paf1 and of Ser2- and Ser5-phosphorylated forms of Rbp1 are reduced but not eliminated. Loss of histone H3 from the induced CHA1 promoter is seen in wild type yeast but is greatly reduced by loss of intact Mediator. In contrast, Swi/Snf recruitment and nucleosome remodeling are unaffected by loss of Mediator function. Thus, Mediator is required for recruitment of the transcription machinery subsequent to chromatin remodeling during CHA1 induction.

We present the first complete high-resolution map of nucleosome occupancy across the whole Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome, identifying over 70,000 positioned nucleosomes occupying 81% of the genome. On a genome-wide scale, the persistent nucleosome-depleted region identified previously in a subset of genes demarcates the transcription start site. Both nucleosome occupancy signatures and overall occupancy correlate with transcript abundance and transcription rate. In addition, functionally related genes can be clustered on the basis of the nucleosome occupancy patterns observed at their promoters. A quantitative model of nucleosome occupancy indicates that DNA structural features may account for much of the global nucleosome occupancy.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae adapts to hypoxia by expressing a large group of "anaerobic" genes. Among these, the eight DAN/TIR genes are regulated by the repressors Rox1 and Mot3 and the activator Upc2/Mox4. In attempting to identify factors recruited by the DNA binding repressor Mot3 to enhance repression of the DAN/TIR genes, we found that the histone deacetylase and global repressor complex, Rpd3-Sin3-Sap30, was not required for repression. Strikingly, the complex was instead required for activation. In addition, the histone H3 and H4 amino termini, which are targets of Rpd3, were also required for DAN1 expression. Epistasis tests demonstrated that the Rpd3 complex is not required in the absence of the repressor Mot3. Furthermore, the Rpd3 complex was required for normal function and stable binding of the activator Upc2 at the DAN1 promoter. Moreover, the Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex was strongly required for activation of DAN1, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis showed an Rpd3-dependent reduction in DAN1 promoter-associated nucleosomes upon induction. Taken together, these data provide evidence that during anaerobiosis, the Rpd3 complex acts at the DAN1 promoter to antagonize the chromatin-mediated repression caused by Mot3 and Rox1 and that chromatin remodeling by Swi/Snf is necessary for normal expression.

Abf1 and Rap1 are general regulatory factors (GRFs) that contribute to transcriptional activation of a large number of genes, as well as to replication, silencing and telomere structure in yeast. In spite of their widespread roles in transcription, the scope of their functional targets genome-wide has not been previously determined. Here, we use microarrays to examine the contribution of these essential GRFs to transcription genome-wide, by using ts mutants that dissociate from their binding sites at 37 degrees C. We then combine this data with published ChIP-chip studies and motif analysis to identify probable direct targets for Abf1 and Rap1. We also identify a substantial number of genes likely to bind Rap1 or Abf1, but not affected by loss of GRF binding. Interestingly, the results strongly suggest that Rap1 can contribute to gene activation from farther upstream than can Abf1. Also, consistent with previous work, more genes that bind Abf1 are unaffected by loss of binding than those that bind Rap1. Finally, we show for several such genes that the Abf1 C-terminal region, which contains the putative activation domain, is not needed to confer this peculiar 'memory effect' that allows continued transcription after loss of Abf1 binding.

Histone amino termini are post-translationally modified by both transcriptional coactivators and corepressors, but the extent to which the relevant histone modifications contribute to gene expression, and the mechanisms by which they do so, are incompletely understood. To address this issue, we have examined the contributions of the histone H3 and H4 amino termini, and of the coactivator and histone acetyltransferase Gcn5p, to activation of a small group of Gcn4p-activated genes. The histone H3 tail exerts a modest (about 2-fold) but significant effect on activation that correlates with a requirement for Gcn5p and is distributed over multiple lysine residues. The H4 tail also plays a positive role in activation of some of those genes tested, but this does not correlate as closely with Gcn5p coactivation. Microarray experiments did not reveal a close correspondence between those genes activated by Gcn4p and genes requiring the H3 or H4 tail, and analysis of published microarray data indicates that Gcn4p-regulated genes are not in general strongly dependent on Gcn5p. However, a large fraction of genes activated by Gcn4p were found to be repressed by the H3 and H4 amino termini under non-inducing conditions, indicating that one role for Gcn4p is to overcome repression mediated by the histone tails.

DNA in eukaryotes is packaged into chromatin by the histone proteins. The four core histones, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, have amino-terminal “tails” that extend from the structured interior and that are subject to numerous posttranslational modifications (7, 54). Acetylation and deacetylation of the histone H3 and H4 amino termini are particularly important for gene regulation, but basic questions about the mechanism by which they affect transcription remain unanswered. For instance, a variety of enzymes can acetylate or deacetylate the H3 and/or H4 tails with different specificities, but it is not known whether modifications of specific lysine residues vary in importance at particular promoters or whether acetylation activates transcription by removing a repressive influence (unacetylated histone tails) or by providing a required positive stimulus (e.g., providing a binding surface for general transcription factors) (1). Furthermore, histone-modifying enzymes may also posttranslationally target other, nonhistone targets, complicating analysis of their functions (6, 22, 43). In an effort to understand how histone modifications affect gene regulation, we have focused in this study on histone deacetylase Rpd3p from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This protein was first identified as a histone deacetylase in a screen for rat proteins binding to trapoxin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor; sequence analysis then showed it to be a homolog of the known yeast corepressor Rpd3p (46). Subsequent work demonstrated that the histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3p is needed for it to function as a corepressor and that promoter-bound histones show decreased acetylation upon recruitment of Rpd3p to nearby sites (18, 20, 35). The loss of Rpd3p results in a global increase in the acetylation of lysine residues 5, 8, 12, and 16 of histone H4 and lysine residues 9 or 18 and 14 of histone H3 (32, 34, 50), whereas promoter-bound nucleosomes near sites of Rpd3p recruitment have been reported in various studies to show the deacetylation of principally K5 of histone H4 (35); K5 and K12 of H4 and undetermined sites of histone H3 (20); and K5, K8, and K12 of H4, K9, K14, K18, K23, and K27 of H3, K27 of histone H2A and, to somewhat lesser extent, K11 and K16 of histone H2B (45). Rpd3p affects the regulation of a substantial number of genes in S. cerevisiae (3). It can be recruited to gene promoters by the repressor Ume6p but evidently by other mechanisms as well (19, 23, 32), and it is also responsible for a lower level of untargeted histone deacetylation throughout the genome in S. cerevisiae (50). Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments have shown that repression by Rpd3p is associated with reduced levels of promoter-bound TATA binding protein, SWI/SNF, and SAGA components, and it has been suggested that reduced acetylation of histone amino termini could weaken the interactions of components of SWI/SNF and/or SAGA with promoter-bound nucleosomes, resulting in decreased levels of transcription (9, 41). However, other histone-modifying enzymes have been shown to target nonhistone proteins with functional consequences (22, 43), and it is possible that Rpd3p does so as well. A prediction that has not yet been tested is that if the histone amino termini are the principal functionally important targets of Rpd3p, then the deletion of Rpd3p should have a reduced (or no) effect in their absence. A similar approach was used previously to test the importance of the histone H3 and H4 amino termini for regulation by Gcn5p in S. cerevisiae (53). Here we report experiments testing this prediction at the gene-specific and genome-wide levels. We also compare, by microarray analysis, the roles of the H3 and H4 amino termini in gene regulation at the genome-wide level and examine the extent to which the loss of the H3 and H4 tails and the mutation of lysines to glutamines results in overlapping phenotypes with respect to transcriptional regulation. Our results provide a global view of the roles of the H3 and H4 amino termini in gene regulation in S. cerevisiae and their relationship to regulation by Rpd3p.

Autonomously replicating sequence binding factor 1 (ABF1) and repressor/activator protein 1 (RAP1) from budding yeast are multifunctional, site-specific DNA-binding proteins, with roles in gene activation and repression, replication, and telomere structure and function. Previously we have shown that RAP1 can prevent nucleosome positioning in the vicinity of its binding site and have provided evidence that this ability to create a local region of "open" chromatin contributes to RAP1 function at the HIS4 promoter by facilitating binding and activation by GCN4. Here we examine and directly compare to that of RAP1 the ability of ABF1 to create a region of open chromatin near its binding site and to contribute to activated transcription at the HIS4, ADE5,7, and HIS7 promoters. ABF1 behaves similarly to RAP1 in these assays, but it shows some subtle differences from RAP1 in the character of the open chromatin region near its binding site. Furthermore, although the two factors can similarly enhance activated transcription at the promoters tested, RAP1 binding is continuously required for this enhancement, but ABF1 binding is not. These results indicate that ABF1 and RAP1 achieve functional similarity in part via mechanistically distinct pathways.

DNA in eukaryotes is packaged into chromatin by association with the four histone proteins, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, to form nucleosomes. Transcription factors must recognize particular DNA sequences to activate genes and so must compete with the histones for occupancy of their cognate binding sites. Beyond this repressive role, the histones have also adopted regulatory roles, both positive and negative, which are largely mediated by amino terminal “tails” that do not contribute to the basic structure of the nucleosome. Here, we describe some of our recent progress in understanding how transcription factors compete with histones for binding site occupancy and also discuss recent results on the global role of the histone H3 amino terminus in regulating gene expression in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The yeast CHA1 promoter is activated in the presence of serine or threonine. Activation requires the Cha4p activator, and it results in perturbation of a nucleosome that incorporates the TATA element under noninducing conditions. We show that in yeast lacking the amino terminus of histone H3, the promoter is constitutively active and the chromatin is concomitantly perturbed. This derepression occurs in the absence of elevated intracellular levels of serine or threonine and is not observed in cells lacking Rpd3p, Tup1p, or the amino terminus of histone H4. Furthermore, derepression in the absence of the H3 amino terminus requires the primary activator of this promoter, Cha4p, which we show by chromatin immunoprecipitation to be constitutively bound to the CHA1 promoter in WT yeast. Thus, the H3 amino terminus is required to prevent Cha4p from activating CHA1 in the absence of inducer. We also present results of a microarray experiment showing that the H3 amino terminus has a substantial repressive effect on a genome-wide scale.

ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers regulate chromatin structure during multiple stages of transcription. We report that RSC, an essential chromatin remodeler, is recruited to the open reading frames (ORFs) of actively transcribed genes genome wide, suggesting a role for RSC in regulating transcription elongation. Consistent with such a role, Pol II occupancy in the ORFs of weakly transcribed genes is drastically reduced upon depletion of the RSC catalytic subunit Sth1. RSC inactivation also reduced histone H3 occupancy across transcribed regions. Remarkably, the strongest effects on Pol II and H3 occupancy were confined to the genes displaying the greatest RSC ORF enrichment. Additionally, RSC recruitment to the ORF requires the activities of the SAGA and NuA4 HAT complexes and is aided by the activities of the Pol II CTD Ser2 kinases Bur1 and Ctk1. Overall, our findings strongly implicate ORF-associated RSC in governing Pol II function and in maintaining chromatin structure over transcribed regions.

Repressor activator protein 1 (RAP1) assists GCN4-mediated HIS4 activation by overcoming some repressive aspect of chromatin structure to facilitate GCN4 binding. RAP1 also participates in other nuclear processes, and discrete domains of RAP1 have been shown to have specific properties including DNA binding, DNA bending, transcriptional activation, and silencing and telomere functions. To investigate whether specific domains of RAP1 are required to “open” chromatin and help GCN4 to activate theHIS4 gene, we examined the abilities of different truncated RAP1 proteins to perturb positioned nucleosomes via a nucleosomal RAP1 site in a yeast episome in vivo, and we testedHIS4 activation in yeast strains harboring truncated RAP1 mutants. We found that neither the DNA bending domain nor the putative activation domain of RAP1 is required for its ability to perturb the chromatin structure of a plasmid containing a RAP1 site. Similarly, neither the putative activation domain nor the N-terminal DNA-bending domain was required for GCN4-mediated activation of HIS4. We also used a rap1ts mutant to show that continuous occupancy of the HIS4 promoter by RAP1 is required for GCN4-mediated gene activation.

Enhancers and transcription factor binding sites that control cell-specific transcription in higher eukaryotes can be found up to hundreds of kilobases from the promoters that they control, making their identification challenging. A new study uses a model based on histone modifications and chromatin dynamics to predict functional elements involved in androgen receptor response.

The yeast transcriptional activator Gal4p can bind to sites in nucleosomal DNA in vivo which it is unable to access in vitro. One event which could allow proteins to bind to otherwise inaccessible sites in chromatin in living cells is DNA replication. To determine whether replication is required for Gal4p to bind to nucleosomal sites in yeast, we have used previously characterized chromatin reporters in which Gal4p binding sites are incorporated into nucleosomes. We find that Gal4p is able to perturb nucleosome positioning via nucleosomal binding sites in yeast arrested either in G1, with alpha-factor, or in G2/M, with nocodazole. Similar results were obtained whether Gal4p synthesis was induced from the endogenous promoter by growth in galactose medium or by an artificial, hormone-inducible system. We also examined binding of the Drosophila transcriptional activator Bicoid, which belongs to the homeodomain class of transcription factors. We show that Bicoid, like Gal4p, can bind to nucleosomal sites in SWI+ and swi1Delta yeast and in the absence of replication. Our results indicate that some feature of the intracellular environment other than DNA replication or the SWI-SNF complex permits factor access to nucleosomal sites.

The SWI-SNF complex in yeast and related complexes in higher eukaryotes have been implicated in assisting gene activation by overcoming the repressive effects of chromatin. We show that the ability of the transcriptional activator GAL4 to bind to a site in a positioned nucleosome is not appreciably impaired in swi mutant yeast cells. However, chromatin remodeling that depends on a transcriptional activation domain shows a considerable, although not complete, SWI-SNF dependence, suggesting that the SWI-SNF complex exerts its major effect at a step subsequent to activator binding. We tested this idea further by comparing the SWI-SNF dependence of a reporter gene based on the GAL10 promoter, which has an accessible upstream activating sequence and a nucleosomal TATA element, with that of a CYC1-lacZ reporter, which has a relatively accessible TATA element. We found that the GAL10-based reporter gene showed a much stronger SWI-SNF dependence than did the CYC1-lacZ reporter with several different activators. Remarkably, transcription of the GAL10-based reporter by a GAL4-GAL11 fusion protein showed a nearly complete requirement for the SWI-SNF complex, strongly suggesting that SWI-SNF is needed to allow access of TFIID or the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Taken together, our results demonstrate that chromatin remodeling in vivo can occur by both SWI-SNF-dependent and -independent avenues and suggest that the SWI-SNF complex exerts its major effect in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to transcriptional activator-promoter recognition.

We examine the generality of transcription factor-mediated chromatin remodeling by monitoring changes in chromatin structure in a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) episome outside of the context of a natural promoter. The episome has a well defined chromatin structure and a binding site for the transcription factor GAL4 but lacks a nearby functional TATA element or transcription start site, so that changes in chromatin structure are unlikely to be caused by transcription. To separate changes caused by binding and by activation domains, we use both GAL4 and a chimeric, hormone-dependent activator consisting of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, an estrogen receptor (ER) hormone-binding domain, and a VP16 activation domain (Louvion, J.-F., Havaux-Copf, B. and Picard, D. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 131, 129-134). Both GAL4 and GAL4.ER.VP16 show very little perturbation of chromatin structure in their nonactivating configurations. Substantial additional perturbation occurs upon activation. This additional perturbation is marked by changes in micrococcal nuclease cleavage patterns, restriction endonuclease accessibility, and DNA topology and is not seen with the nonactivating derivative GAL4.ER. Remodeling by GAL4.ER.VP16 is detectable within 15 min following hormone addition and is complete within 45 min, suggesting that replication is not required. We conclude that activation domains can exert a major influence on chromatin remodeling by increasing binding affinity and/or by recruitment of other chromatin remodeling activities and that this remodeling can occur outside the context of a bona fide promoter.

Transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) in eukaryotes requires the Mediator complex, and often involves chromatin remodeling and histone eviction at active promoters. Here we address the role of Mediator in recruitment of the Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex and its role, along with components of the preinitiation complex (PIC), in histone eviction at inducible and constitutively active promoters in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that recruitment of the Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling complex to the induced CHA1 promoter, as well as its association with several constitutively active promoters, depends on the Mediator complex but is independent of Mediator at the induced MET2 and MET6 genes. Although transcriptional activation and histone eviction at CHA1 depends on Swi/Snf, Swi/Snf recruitment is not sufficient for histone eviction at the induced CHA1 promoter. Loss of Swi/Snf activity does not affect histone occupancy of several constitutively active promoters; in contrast, higher histone occupancy is seen at these promoters in Mediator and PIC component mutants. We propose that an initial activator-dependent, nucleosome remodeling step allows PIC components to outcompete histones for occupancy of promoter sequences. We also observe reduced promoter association of Mediator and TATA-binding protein in a Pol II (rpb1-1) mutant, indicating mutually cooperative binding of these components of the transcription machinery and indicating that it is the PIC as a whole whose binding results in stable histone eviction.

To examine the role of nucleosome occupancy in the evolution of gene expression, we measured the genome-wide nucleosome profiles of four yeast species, three belonging to the Saccharomyces sensu stricto lineage and the more distantly related Candida glabrata. Nucleosomes and associated promoter elements at C. glabrata genes are typically shifted upstream by ∼20 bp, compared to their orthologs from sensu stricto species. Nonetheless, all species display the same global organization features first described for Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a stereotypical nucleosome organization along genes and a division of promoters into those that contain or lack a pronounced nucleosome-depleted region (NDR), with the latter displaying a more dynamic pattern of gene expression. Despite this global similarity, however, nucleosome occupancy at specific genes diverged extensively between sensu stricto and C. glabrata orthologs (∼50 million years). Orthologs with dynamic expression patterns tend to maintain their lack of NDR, but apart from that, sensu stricto and C. glabrata orthologs are nearly as similar in nucleosome occupancy patterns as nonorthologous genes. This extensive divergence in nucleosome occupancy contrasts with a conserved pattern of gene expression. Thus, while some evolutionary changes in nucleosome occupancy contribute to gene expression divergence, nucleosome occupancy often diverges extensively with apparently little impact on gene expression.

The binding of transcription factors to specific DNA target sequences is the fundamental basis of gene regulatory networks. Chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with DNA tiling arrays or high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq, respectively) has been used in many recent studies that detail the binding sites of various transcription factors. Surprisingly, data from a variety of model organisms and tissues have demonstrated that transcription factors vary greatly in their number of genomic binding sites, and that binding events can significantly exceed the number of known or possible direct gene targets. Thus, current understanding of transcription factor function must expand to encompass what role, if any, binding might have outside of direct transcriptional target regulation. In this review, we discuss the biological significance of genome-wide binding of transcription factors and present models that can account for this phenomenon.

Studies in vivo and in vitro have shown that the packaging of DNA into chromatin can affect gene expression. Here, binding of the yeast transcriptional activator GAL4 to DNA in chromatin has been investigated in vivo with a yeast episome. A positioned nucleosome that is present in cells grown in glucose and contains a single GAL4 binding site is disrupted by GAL4 binding in galactose. GAL4 can also bind to DNA in chromatin when the carboxyl-terminal activation domain of GAL4 is either masked by GAL80 or is absent. These results show that a transcription factor can bind to its site in vivo in what would appear to be a repressive chromatin structure.

The packaging of eukaryotic DNA into chromatin has profound consequences for gene regulation, as well as for other DNA transactions such as recombination, replication and repair. Understanding how this packaging is determined is consequently a pressing problem in molecular genetics. DNA sequence, chromatin remodelers and transcription factors affect chromatin structure, but the scope of these influences on genome-wide nucleosome occupancy patterns remains uncertain. Here, we use high resolution tiling arrays to examine the contributions of two general regulatory factors, Abf1 and Rap1, to nucleosome occupancy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These factors have each been shown to bind to a few hundred promoters, but we find here that thousands of loci show localized regions of altered nucleosome occupancy within 1 h of loss of Abf1 or Rap1 binding, and that altered chromatin structure can occur via binding sites having a wide range of affinities. These results indicate that DNA-binding transcription factors affect chromatin structure, and probably dynamics, throughout the genome to a much greater extent than previously appreciated.

Mediator is a large, multisubunit complex that is essential for transcription of mRNA by RNA Pol II in eukaryotes and is believed to bridge transcriptional activators and the general transcription machinery. However, several recent studies suggest that the requirement for Mediator during transcriptional activation is not universal, but rather activator dependent, and may be indirect for some genes. Here we have investigated Mediator association with several constitutively transcribed genes in yeast by comparing a yeast strain that harbors a temperature-sensitive mutation in an essential Mediator subunit, Srb4, with its wild-type (WT) counterpart. We find modest association of Mediator with constitutively active genes and show that this association is strongly decreased in srb4 ts yeast, whereas association with a nontranscribed region or repressed gene promoters is lower and unaffected in the mutant yeast. The tail module of Mediator remains associated with ribosomal protein (RP) gene promoters in srb4 ts yeast, while subunits from the head and middle modules are lost. Tail module association at Rap1-dependent gene promoters is lost in rap1 ts yeast, indicating that Rap1 is required for Mediator recruitment at these gene promoters and that its recruitment occurs via the tail module. Pol II association is also rapidly and severely affected in srb4 ts yeast, indicating that Mediator is directly required for pol II association at constitutively transcribed genes. Our results are consistent with Mediator functioning as a general transcription factor in yeast.

Genome-wide studies have identified abundant small, noncoding RNAs, including small nuclear RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs), and upstream regulatory RNAs (uRNAs), that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II (pol II) and terminated by an Nrd1-dependent pathway. Here, we show that the prolyl isomerase Ess1 is required for Nrd1-dependent termination of noncoding RNAs. Ess1 binds the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of pol II and is thought to regulate transcription by conformational isomerization of Ser-Pro bonds within the CTD. In ess1 mutants, expression of approximately 10% of the genome was altered, due primarily to defects in termination of snoRNAs, CUTs, stable unannotated transcripts, and uRNAs. Ess1 promoted dephosphorylation of Ser5 (but not Ser2) within the CTD, most likely by the Ssu72 phosphatase. We also provide evidence for a competition between Nrd1 and Pcf11 for CTD binding that is regulated by Ess1. These data indicate that a prolyl isomerase is required for specifying the "CTD code."

Coding regions of transcribed and non-transcribed genes typically differ in chromatin structure. However, it is not known what kind of alterations in nucleosome or chromatin structure these differences reflect. To determine whether changes in nucleosome topology accompany transcription, we introduced into yeast a multicopy plasmid bearing the gene coding for the heat shock protein HSP26. The plasmid-borne gene is assembled into chromatin, and is induced by heat shock in the same manner as the endogenous HSP26 gene. A small change in linking number in the HSP26 plasmid accompanies heat shock. This change is consistent with that previously reported for thermal untwisting of DNA in yeast chromatin, and is equivalent in magnitude to that observed in control plasmids which lack heat-shock response elements. These data indicate that no stable alteration in nucleosome topology accompanies transcription of the heat shock gene. Moreover, the kinetics of the observed changes in linking number indicate that topoisomerase relaxes the thermally induced torsional stress in 1-5 min. We conclude that if alterations in nucleosome topology accompany polymerase passage, recovery must take place within this time period.

We have defined protein-DNA interactions associated with the transcription complex of a Xenopus somatic 5 S RNA gene under efficient in vitro transcription conditions. Transcription factor IIIA, the internal control region of the 5 S RNA gene and specific DNA sequences 5' and 3' of the internal control region are all involved in the formation of a multiprotein complex. Specific protein-DNA interactions outside of the 5 S RNA gene itself, revealed by DNase I footprinting, have no apparent role in the transcription process. Sequences within the 5 S RNA gene, 5' of the internal control region, are not essential for transcription by RNA polymerase III in vitro, but do contribute to its efficiency.

In eukaryotes, transcription factors, including both gene-specific activators and general transcription factors (GTFs), operate in a chromatin milieu. Here, we review evidence from gene-specific and genome-wide studies indicating that chromatin presents an environment that is typically permissive for activator binding, conditional for pre-initiation complex (PIC) formation, and inhibitory for productive PIC assembly within coding sequences. We also discuss the role of nucleosome dynamics in facilitating access to transcription factors (TFs) in vivo and indicate some of the principal questions raised by recent findings.

Transcriptional activators and the general transcription machinery must gain access to DNA that in eukaryotes may be packaged into nucleosomes. In this review, I discuss this problem from the standpoint of the types of chromatin structures that these DNA-binding proteins may encounter, and the mechanisms by which they may contend with various chromatin structures. The discussion includes consideration of experiments in which chromatin structure is manipulated in vivo to confront activators with nucleosomal binding sites, and the roles of nucleosome dynamics and activation domains in facilitating access to such sites. Finally, the role of activators in facilitating access of the general transcriptional machinery to sites in chromatin is discussed. Key words: nucleosome, chromatin, transcriptional activation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Transcriptional activation in eukaryotes is generally initiated by the binding of an activator to the promoter. Activator binding sites may occur in nucleosome-free regions or may be incorporated into positioned nucleosomes (2, 14, 40, 73, 86). In the latter case, activator binding usually results in nucleosome perturbation (3, 58, 86). We have used yeast episomes having strongly positioned nucleosomes to show that transcriptional activators are capable of perturbing chromatin structure via nucleosomal sites in vivo even outside the context of a natural promoter (46, 66). This perturbation seems likely to result from stable activator binding, although this has not been demonstrated directly, and is strongly dependent on the activation domain (AD) (46, 66, 82). For example, GAL4 perturbs a positioned nucleosome containing its binding site in yeast to a much greater degree in cells grown in galactose medium, when it is in its activating configuration, than in glucose, when it is not, and the chimeric activator GAL4-estrogen receptor (ER)-VP16 similarly is much more effective at this perturbation in the presence of activating β-estradiol than in its absence (66). Consistent with these results, binding of transcription factors is increased by ADs in both yeast and mammalian cells to sites having uncharacterized chromatin structure (9, 70). ADs could facilitate chromatin remodeling via nucleosomal binding sites by contacting components of the preinitiation complex (PIC), such as TFIIB or TATA-binding protein (TBP), and thereby stabilizing activator binding, or by recruiting complexes capable of remodeling or modifying chromatin. Considerable support for activators having both of these functions derives from in vitro and in vivo studies (53, 54, 56). Interactions with components of the PIC could enhance binding through cooperative protein-protein interactions, with additional free energy being provided by nonspecific interactions between PIC components and nearby DNA sequences (12, 72). We have recently shown that fusion of TBP to the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of GAL4 or LexA is not sufficient to remodel via a nucleosomal binding site or to remodel nucleosomes that are near accessible binding sites in vivo (63). However, whether TBP contributes to chromatin remodeling in the context of a true activation domain, or whether other PIC components could be involved in this function, remains to be tested. ADs can recruit chromatin remodeling complexes, which use ATP to alter nucleosome structure in a way that increases accessibility of nucleosomal DNA (54). Recruitment of chromatin-remodeling complexes such as SWI-SNF and NURF can facilitate transcriptional activation of chromatin in vitro, probably by increasing accessibility to PIC components (1, 44, 54). Some genes that undergo chromatin remodeling upon activation in vivo depend on SWI-SNF but others do not, indicating functional redundancy among activities that contribute to chromatin remodeling (16, 22, 28, 30, 45). We have shown that activators can perturb chromatin via nucleosomal sites in swiΔ yeast cells, although some reduction in perturbation of nucleosome positioning was seen for GAL4-ER-VP16 in one case (62). Another potential class of targets for ADs is chromatin-modifying complexes. Chromatin-modifying complexes characterized to date include enzymes, such as GCN5 in the SAGA complex and ESA1 in the NuA4 complex, that can acetylate the amino termini of histones (7). Other histone modifications that may contribute to transcriptional regulation also have been observed and presumably are due to additional complexes (11). GCN5, the prototypical histone acetyltransferase (HAT) (8), contributes to activation of a number of genes in yeast (23, 28, 31, 52, 55, 68). Recruitment of the SAGA complex greatly increases transcriptional activation in vitro (32, 67, 71), and a few examples in which chromatin remodeling depends on GCN5 in vivo have been reported (27, 28, 69). Whether GCN5 contributes to chromatin remodeling by activators via nucleosomal binding sites has not been reported and is the major focus of this paper. Potential redundancy among chromatin-remodeling and -modifying complexes, already alluded to, has been investigated but is not well understood (6, 55, 57, 63, 68). Different activators may differentially recruit distinct complexes, and promoters may vary in their requirements for chromatin remodeling (1, 15, 32, 69). We have attempted to address this issue in this work by comparing chromatin remodeling dependence on GCN5 for ADs varying in type and in strength. We also compare requirements for several ADs at distinct promoters that require chromatin remodeling for their activation.

Transcriptional activators are believed to work in part by recruiting general transcription factors, such as TATA-binding protein (TBP) and the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Activation domains also contribute to remodeling of chromatin in vivo. To determine whether these two activities represent distinct functions of activation domains, we have examined transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling accompanying artificial recruitment of TBP in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). We measured transcription of reporter genes with defined chromatin structure by artificial recruitment of TBP and found that a reporter gene whose TATA element was relatively accessible could be activated by artificially recruited TBP, whereas two promoters, GAL10 and CHA1, that have accessible activator binding sites, but nucleosomal TATA elements, could not. A third reporter gene containing the HIS4 promoter could be activated by GAL4-TBP only when a RAP1 binding site was present, although RAP1 alone could not activate the reporter, suggesting that RAP1 was needed to open the chromatin structure to allow activation. Consistent with this interpretation, artificially recruited TBP was unable to perturb nucleosome positioning via a nucleosomal binding site, in contrast to a true activator such as GAL4, or to perturb the TATA-containing nucleosome at the CHA1 promoter. Finally, we show that activation of the GAL10 promoter by GAL4, which requires chromatin remodeling, can occur even in swi gcn5 yeast, implying that remodeling pathways independent of GCN5, the SWI-SNF complex, and TFIID can operate during transcriptional activation in vivo.

RAP1 (repressor/activator protein 1) from budding yeast is well known for its involvement in gene activation and repression, telomere structure and function, and replication. Recent studies have examined additional roles for RAP1 in heterochromatin boundary-element formation, creation of hotspots for meiotic recombination, and chromatin opening. These studies provide new insight into the ability of this abundant DNA-binding protein to participate in a diverse array of functions taking place in a chromatin environment.

Transcriptional activators function in vivo via binding sites that may be packaged into chromatin. Here we show that whereas the transcriptional activator GAL4 is strongly able to perturb chromatin structure via a nucleosomal binding site in yeast, GCN4 does so poorly. Correspondingly, GCN4 requires assistance from an accessory protein, RAP1, for activation of the HIS4 promoter, whereas GAL4 does not. The requirement for RAP1 for GCN4-mediated HIS4 activation is dictated by the DNA-binding domain of GCN4 and not the activation domain, suggesting that RAP1 assists GCN4 in gaining access to its binding site. Consistent with this, overexpression of GCN4 partially alleviates the requirement for RAP1, whereas HIS4 activation via a weak GAL4 binding site requires RAP1. RAP1 is extremely effective at interfering with positioning of a nucleosome containing its binding site, consistent with a role in opening chromatin at the HIS4 promoter. Furthermore, increasing the spacing between binding sites for RAP1 and GCN4 by 5 or 10 bp does not impair HIS4 activation, indicating that cooperative protein-protein interactions are not involved in transcriptional facilitation by RAP1. We conclude that an important role of RAP1 is to assist activator binding by opening chromatin.

Publisher Summary Positions of nucleosomes are defined translationally and rotationally. Translational positioning specifies where the histone core begins and ends along a DNA sequence. Rotational positioning refers to the orientation of a DNA helix relative to the histone core. Several techniques have been developed to map both the translational and rotational positioning of nucleosomes. These techniques utilize enzymes or chemicals that cleave nucleosomal and nonnucleosomal DNA differentially. Differential cleavage is largely because of the wrapping of DNA around the nucleosome core, which makes DNA in chromatin less accessible to cutting. In many cases, the mechanism of positioning is unclear. Experimental evidence indicates that nucleosome positioning can be directed by a DNA sequence and by DNA-binding proteins that position nucleosomes or generate nucleosome-free regions that influence positioning in adjacent sequences. This chapter discusses the methodologies that are used to assess nucleosome positioning in yeast.

GAL4.estrogen receptor.VP16 (GAL4.ER.VP16), which contains the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, the human ER hormone binding (AF-2) domain, and the VP16 activation domain, functions as a hormone-dependent transcriptional activator in yeast (Louvion, J.-F., Havaux-Copf, B., and Picard, D. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 131, 129-134). Previously, we showed that this activator can remodel chromatin in yeast in a hormone-dependent manner. In this work, we show that a weakened VP16 activation domain in GAL4.ER.VP16 still allows hormone-dependent chromatin remodeling, but mutations in the AF-2 domain that abolish activity in the native ER also eliminate the ability of GAL4.ER.VP16 to activate transcription and to remodel chromatin. These findings suggest that an important role of the AF-2 domain in the native ER is to mask the activation potential of the AF-1 activation domain in the unliganded state; upon ligand activation, a conformational change releases AF-2-mediated repression and transcriptional activation ensues. We also show that the AF-2 domain, although inactive at simple promoters on its own in yeast, can enhance transcription by the MCM1 activator in hormone-dependent manner, consistent with its having a role in activation as well as repression in the native ER.

Candida albicans is a fungal pathogen that causes potentially fatal infections among immune-compromised individuals. The emergence of drug resistant C. albicans strains makes it important to identify new antifungal drug targets. Among potential targets are enzymes known as peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerases (PPIases) that catalyze isomerization of peptide bonds preceding proline. We are investigating a PPIase called Ess1, which is conserved in all major human pathogenic fungi. Previously, we reported that C. albicans Ess1 is essential for growth and morphogenetic switching. In the present study, we re-evaluated these findings using more rigorous genetic analyses, including the use of additional CaESS1 mutant alleles, distinct marker genes, and the engineering of suitably-matched isogenic control strains. The results confirm that CaEss1 is essential for growth in C. albicans, but show that reduction of CaESS1 gene dosage by half (δ/+) does not interfere with morphogenetic switching. However, further reduction of CaEss1 levels using a conditional allele does reduce morphogenetic switching. We also examine the role of the linker α-helix that distinguishes C. albicans Ess1 from the human Pin1 enzyme, and present results of a genome-wide transcriptome analysis. The latter analysis indicates that CaEss1 has a conserved role in regulation of RNA polymerase II function, and is required for efficient termination of small nucleolar RNAs and repression of cryptic transcription in C. albicans.