1. Is MHC diversity a better marker for conservation than neutral genetic diversity? A case study of two contrasting dolphin populations
- Author
-
Richard C. Connor, Anna M. Kopps, Oliver Manlik, Simon Allen, Celine H. Frère, Janet Mann, William B. Sherwin, Michael Krützen, Lars Bejder, University of Zurich, and Manlik, Oliver
- Subjects
10207 Department of Anthropology ,0106 biological sciences ,Conservation genetics ,bottlenose dolphin ,Population ,Peptide binding ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,microsatellites ,2309 Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Nucleotide diversity ,03 medical and health sciences ,Minimum viable population ,lcsh:QH540-549.5 ,Genetic variation ,14. Life underwater ,education ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Original Research ,030304 developmental biology ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,0303 health sciences ,education.field_of_study ,Genetic diversity ,Ecology ,300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology ,adaptive genetic variation ,major histocompatibility complex ,1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,conservation genetics ,Evolutionary biology ,Genetic marker ,cetacean ,lcsh:Ecology ,2303 Ecology ,human activities - Abstract
Genetic diversity is essential for populations to adapt to changing environments. Measures of genetic diversity are often based on selectively neutral markers, such as microsatellites. Genetic diversity to guide conservation management, however, is better reflected by adaptive markers, including genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Our aim was to assess MHC and neutral genetic diversity in two contrasting bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus) populations in Western Australia—one apparently viable population with high reproductive output (Shark Bay) and one with lower reproductive output that was forecast to decline (Bunbury). We assessed genetic variation in the two populations by sequencing the MHC class II DQB, which encompasses the functionally important peptide binding regions (PBR). Neutral genetic diversity was assessed by genotyping twenty‐three microsatellite loci. We confirmed that MHC is an adaptive marker in both populations. Overall, the Shark Bay population exhibited greater MHC diversity than the Bunbury population—for example, it displayed greater MHC nucleotide diversity. In contrast, the difference in microsatellite diversity between the two populations was comparatively low. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that viable populations typically display greater genetic diversity than less viable populations. The results also suggest that MHC variation is more closely associated with population viability than neutral genetic variation. Although the inferences from our findings are limited, because we only compared two populations, our results add to a growing number of studies that highlight the usefulness of MHC as a potentially suitable genetic marker for animal conservation. The Shark Bay population, which carries greater adaptive genetic diversity than the Bunbury population, is thus likely more robust to natural or human‐induced changes to the coastal ecosystem it inhabits.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF