1. Magnetic moment and lifetime measurements of Coulomb-excited states inCd106
- Author
-
I. Abramovic, L. W. Phair, I. Mayers, N. Benczer-Koller, T. A. Laplace, Z. E. Guevara, P. Fallon, K.-H. Speidel, A. M. Hurst, J. M. Allmond, E. F. Matthews, Yitzhak Sharon, L. Kirsch, G. J. Kumbartzki, James E. Bevins, A. Lo, D. A. Torres, F. Ramirez, H. L. Crawford, Shadow J. Q. Robinson, A. Wiens, L. A. Bernstein, and Science and Technology of Nuclear Fusion
- Subjects
Physics ,Magnetic moment ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,Excited state ,0103 physical sciences ,Coulomb ,Coulomb barrier ,Atomic physics ,010306 general physics ,01 natural sciences - Abstract
Background: The Cd isotopes are well studied, but experimental data for the rare isotopes are sparse. At energies above the Coulomb barrier, higher states become accessible.Purpose: Remeasure and supplement existing lifetimes and magnetic moments of low-lying states in $^{106}\mathrm{Cd}$.Methods: In an inverse kinematics reaction, a $^{106}\mathrm{Cd}$ beam impinging on a $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ target was used to Coulomb excite the projectiles. The high recoil velocities provide a unique opportunity to measure $g$ factors with the transient-field technique and to determine lifetimes from lineshapes by using the Doppler-shift-attenuation method. Large-scale shell-model calculations were carried out for $^{106}\mathrm{Cd}$.Results: The $g$ factors of the ${2}_{1}^{+}$ and ${4}_{1}^{+}$ states in $^{106}\mathrm{Cd}$ were measured to be $g({2}_{1}^{+})=+0.398(22)$ and $g({4}_{1}^{+})=+0.23(5)$. A lineshape analysis yielded lifetimes in disagreement with published values. The new results are $\ensuremath{\tau}(^{106}\mathrm{Cd};{2}_{1}^{+})=7.0(3)\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$ and $\ensuremath{\tau}(^{106}\mathrm{Cd};{4}_{1}^{+})=2.5(2)\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$. The mean life $\ensuremath{\tau}(^{106}\mathrm{Cd};{2}_{2}^{+})=0.28(2)\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$ was determined from the fully-Doppler-shifted $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ line. Mean lives of $\ensuremath{\tau}(^{106}\mathrm{Cd};{4}_{3}^{+})=1.1(1)\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$ and $\ensuremath{\tau}(^{106}\mathrm{Cd};{3}_{1}^{\ensuremath{-}})=0.16(1)\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$ were determined for the first time.Conclusions: The newly measured $g({4}_{1}^{+})$ of $^{106}\mathrm{Cd}$ is found to be only 59% of the $g({2}_{1}^{+})$. This difference cannot be explained by either shell-model or collective-model calculations.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF