17 results on '"Rigsby P"'
Search Results
2. Clinical decision support: the role of ACR Appropriateness Criteria
- Author
-
Chan, Sherwin S., Francavilla, Michael L., Iyer, Ramesh S., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Kurth, David, and Karmazyn, Boaz K.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Congenital or Acquired Heart Disease.
- Author
-
Krishnamurthy, Rajesh, Suman, Garima, Chan, Sherwin S., Kirsch, Jacobo, Iyer, Ramesh S., Bolen, Michael A., Brown, Richard K.J., El-Sherief, Ahmed H., Galizia, Mauricio S., Hanneman, Kate, Hsu, Joe Y., de Rosen, Veronica Lenge, Rajiah, Prabhakar Shantha, Renapurkar, Rahul D., Russell, Raymond R., Samyn, Margaret, Shen, Jody, Villines, Todd C., Wall, Jessica J., and Rigsby, Cynthia K.
- Abstract
Pediatric heart disease is a large and diverse field with an overall prevalence estimated at 6 to 13 per 1,000 live births. This document discusses appropriateness of advanced imaging for a broad range of variants. Diseases covered include tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of great arteries, congenital or acquired pediatric coronary artery abnormality, single ventricle, aortopathy, anomalous pulmonary venous return, aortopathy and aortic coarctation, with indications for advanced imaging spanning the entire natural history of the disease in children and adults, including initial diagnosis, treatment planning, treatment monitoring, and early detection of complications. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Ataxia-Child.
- Author
-
Radhakrishnan, Rupa, Shea, Lindsey A.G., Pruthi, Sumit, Silvera, Victoria M., Bosemani, Thangamadhan, Desai, Nilesh K., Gilbert, Donald L., Glenn, Orit A., Guimaraes, Carolina V., Ho, Mai-Lan, Lam, H. F. Samuel, Maheshwari, Mohit, Mirsky, David M., Nadel, Helen R., Partap, Sonia, Schooler, Gary R., Udayasankar, Unni K., Whitehead, Matthew T., Wright, Jason N., and Rigsby, Cynthia K.
- Abstract
Childhood ataxia may be due to multifactorial causes of impairment in the coordination of movement and balance. Acutely presenting ataxia in children may be due to infectious, inflammatory, toxic, ischemic, or traumatic etiology. Intermittent or episodic ataxia in children may be manifestations of migraine, benign positional vertigo, or intermittent metabolic disorders. Nonprogressive childhood ataxia suggests a congenital brain malformation or early prenatal or perinatal brain injury, and progressive childhood ataxia indicates inherited causes or acquired posterior fossa lesions that result in gradual cerebellar dysfunction. CT and MRI of the central nervous system are the usual modalities used in imaging children presenting with ataxia, based on the clinical presentation. This document provides initial imaging guidelines for a child presenting with acute ataxia with or without a history of recent trauma, recurrent ataxia with interval normal neurological examination, chronic progressive ataxia, and chronic nonprogressive ataxia. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Crohn Disease-Child.
- Author
-
Moore, Michael M., Gee, Michael S., Iyer, Ramesh S., Chan, Sherwin S., Ayers, Travis D., Bardo, Dianna M.E., Chandra, Tushar, Cooper, Matthew L., Dotson, Jennifer L., Gadepalli, Samir K., Gill, Anne E., Levin, Terry L., Nadel, Helen R., Schooler, Gary R., Shet, Narendra S., Squires, Judy H., Trout, Andrew T., Wall, Jessica J., Rigsby, Cynthia K., and Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging
- Abstract
Crohn disease is an inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract with episodes of exacerbation and remission occurring in children, adolescents, and adults. Crohn disease diagnosis and treatment depend upon a combination of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, histological, and imaging findings. Appropriate use of imaging provides critical information in the settings of diagnosis, assessment of acute symptoms, disease surveillance, and therapy monitoring. Four variants are discussed. The first variant discusses the initial imaging for suspected Crohn disease before established diagnosis. The second variant pertains to appropriateness of imaging modalities during suspected acute exacerbation. The third variant is a substantial discussion of recommendations related to disease surveillance and monitoring of Crohn disease. Finally, panel recommendations and discussion of perianal fistulizing disease imaging completes the document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteomyelitis or Septic Arthritis-Child (Excluding Axial Skeleton).
- Author
-
Shet, Narendra S., Iyer, Ramesh S., Chan, Sherwin S., Baldwin, Keith, Chandra, Tushar, Chen, Jimmy, Cooper, Matthew L., Creech, C. Buddy, Gill, Anne E., Levin, Terry L., Moore, Michael M., Nadel, Helen R., Saidinejad, Mohsen, Schooler, Gary R., Squires, Judy H., Swenson, David W., Rigsby, Cynthia K., and Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging
- Abstract
Imaging plays an integral role in the evaluation of suspected musculoskeletal infections in children, not only in the accurate identification of infection such as osteomyelitis or septic arthritis, but also in guiding management. Various diagnostic modalities serve different purposes in the assessment of suspected pediatric musculoskeletal infections. The purpose of this document is to provide imaging guidance in the most frequently encountered clinical scenarios in which osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis are suspected, outside of the axial skeleton. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Antenatal Hydronephrosis–Infant.
- Author
-
Brown, Brandon P., Simoneaux, Stephen F., Dillman, Jonathan R., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Iyer, Ramesh S., Alazraki, Adina L., Bardo, Dianna M.E., Chan, Sherwin S., Chandra, Tushar, Dorfman, Scott R., Garber, Matthew D., Moore, Michael M., Nguyen, Jie C., Peters, Craig A., Shet, Narendra S., Siegel, Alan, Waseem, Muhammad, and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Antenatal hydronephrosis is the most frequent urinary tract anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasonography. It occurs approximately twice as often in males as in females. Most antenatal hydronephrosis is transient with little long-term significance, and few children with antenatal hydronephrosis will have significant obstruction, develop symptoms or complications, and require surgery. Some children will be diagnosed with more serious conditions, such as posterior urethral valves. Early detection of obstructive uropathy is necessary to mitigate the potential morbidity from loss of renal function. Imaging is an integral part of screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of children with antenatal hydronephrosis. Optimal timing and appropriate use of imaging can reduce the incidence of late diagnoses and prevent renal scarring and other complications. In general, follow-up neonatal ultrasound is recommended for all cases of antenatal hydronephrosis, while further imaging, including voiding cystourethrography and nuclear scintigraphy, is recommended for moderate or severe cases, or when renal parenchymal or bladder wall abnormalities are suspected. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Vomiting in Infants.
- Author
-
Alazraki, Adina L., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Iyer, Ramesh S., Bardo, Dianna M.E., Brown, Brandon P., Chan, Sherwin S., Chandra, Tushar, Dietrich, Ann, Falcone, Richard A., Garber, Matthew D., Gill, Anne E., Levin, Terry L., Moore, Michael M., Nguyen, Jie C., Shet, Narendra S., Squires, Judy H., Trout, Andrew T., and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Vomiting in infants under the age of 3 months is one of the most common reasons for parents to seek care from their doctor or present to an emergency room. The imaging workup that ensues is dependent on several factors: age at onset, days versus weeks after birth, quality of emesis, bilious or nonbilious vomiting, and the initial findings on plain radiograph, suspected proximal versus distal bowel obstruction. The purpose of these guidelines is to inform the clinician, based on current evidence, what is the next highest yield and most appropriate imaging study to pursue a diagnosis. The goal is rapid and accurate arrival at a plan for treatment, whether surgical or nonsurgical. The following modalities are discussed for each variant of the symptom: plain radiography, fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal series, fluoroscopic contrast enema, ultrasound of the abdomen, nuclear medicine gastroesophageal reflux scan. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Vomiting in Infants.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging, Alazraki, Adina L, Rigsby, Cynthia K, Iyer, Ramesh S, Bardo, Dianna M E, Brown, Brandon P, Chan, Sherwin S, Chandra, Tushar, Dietrich, Ann, Falcone, Richard A Jr, Garber, Matthew D, Gill, Anne E, Levin, Terry L, Moore, Michael M, Nguyen, Jie C, Shet, Narendra S, Squires, Judy H, Trout, Andrew T, and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Vomiting in infants under the age of 3 months is one of the most common reasons for parents to seek care from their doctor or present to an emergency room. The imaging workup that ensues is dependent on several factors: age at onset, days versus weeks after birth, quality of emesis, bilious or nonbilious vomiting, and the initial findings on plain radiograph, suspected proximal versus distal bowel obstruction. The purpose of these guidelines is to inform the clinician, based on current evidence, what is the next highest yield and most appropriate imaging study to pursue a diagnosis. The goal is rapid and accurate arrival at a plan for treatment, whether surgical or nonsurgical. The following modalities are discussed for each variant of the symptom: plain radiography, fluoroscopic upper gastrointestinal series, fluoroscopic contrast enema, ultrasound of the abdomen, nuclear medicine gastroesophageal reflux scan. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Antenatal Hydronephrosis-Infant.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging, Brown, Brandon P, Simoneaux, Stephen F, Dillman, Jonathan R, Rigsby, Cynthia K, Iyer, Ramesh S, Alazraki, Adina L, Bardo, Dianna M E, Chan, Sherwin S, Chandra, Tushar, Dorfman, Scott R, Garber, Matthew D, Moore, Michael M, Nguyen, Jie C, Peters, Craig A, Shet, Narendra S, Siegel, Alan, Waseem, Muhammad, and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Antenatal hydronephrosis is the most frequent urinary tract anomaly detected on prenatal ultrasonography. It occurs approximately twice as often in males as in females. Most antenatal hydronephrosis is transient with little long-term significance, and few children with antenatal hydronephrosis will have significant obstruction, develop symptoms or complications, and require surgery. Some children will be diagnosed with more serious conditions, such as posterior urethral valves. Early detection of obstructive uropathy is necessary to mitigate the potential morbidity from loss of renal function. Imaging is an integral part of screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of children with antenatal hydronephrosis. Optimal timing and appropriate use of imaging can reduce the incidence of late diagnoses and prevent renal scarring and other complications. In general, follow-up neonatal ultrasound is recommended for all cases of antenatal hydronephrosis, while further imaging, including voiding cystourethrography and nuclear scintigraphy, is recommended for moderate or severe cases, or when renal parenchymal or bladder wall abnormalities are suspected. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pneumonia in the Immunocompetent Child.
- Author
-
Chan, Sherwin S., Kotecha, Manish K., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Iyer, Ramesh S., Alazraki, Adina L., Anupindi, Sudha A., Bardo, Dianna M.E., Brown, Brandon P., Chandra, Tushar, Dorfman, Scott R., Garber, Matthew D., Moore, Michael M., Nguyen, Jie C., Shet, Narendra S., Siegel, Alan, Valente, Jonathan H., and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Pneumonia is one of the most common acute infections and the single greatest infectious cause of death in children worldwide. In uncomplicated, community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent patients, the diagnosis is clinical and imaging has no role. The first role of imaging is to identify complications associated with pneumonia such as pleural effusion, pulmonary abscess, and bronchopleural fistula. Radiographs are recommended for screening for these complications and ultrasound and CT are recommended for confirmation. The second role of imaging is to identify underlying anatomic conditions that may predispose patients to recurrent pneumonia. CT with intravenously administered contrast is recommended for this evaluation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pneumonia in the Immunocompetent Child.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging, Chan, Sherwin S, Kotecha, Manish K, Rigsby, Cynthia K, Iyer, Ramesh S, Alazraki, Adina L, Anupindi, Sudha A, Bardo, Dianna M E, Brown, Brandon P, Chandra, Tushar, Dorfman, Scott R, Garber, Matthew D, Moore, Michael M, Nguyen, Jie C, Shet, Narendra S, Siegel, Alan, Valente, Jonathan H, and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Pneumonia is one of the most common acute infections and the single greatest infectious cause of death in children worldwide. In uncomplicated, community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent patients, the diagnosis is clinical and imaging has no role. The first role of imaging is to identify complications associated with pneumonia such as pleural effusion, pulmonary abscess, and bronchopleural fistula. Radiographs are recommended for screening for these complications and ultrasound and CT are recommended for confirmation. The second role of imaging is to identify underlying anatomic conditions that may predispose patients to recurrent pneumonia. CT with intravenously administered contrast is recommended for this evaluation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip-Child.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:, Nguyen, Jie C, Dorfman, Scott R, Rigsby, Cynthia K, Iyer, Ramesh S, Alazraki, Adina L, Anupindi, Sudha A, Bardo, Dianna M E, Brown, Brandon P, Chan, Sherwin S, Chandra, Tushar, Garber, Matthew D, Moore, Michael M, Pandya, Nirav K, Shet, Narendra S, Siegel, Alan, and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common hip pathology in infants. Although its exact pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, its long-term prognosis depends not only on the severity of the dysphasia, but also on the timely implementation of appropriate treatment. Unrecognized and untreated hip subluxations and dislocations inevitably lead to early joint degeneration while overtreatment can produce iatrogenic complications, including avascular necrosis of the femoral head. In the past two decades, imaging has become an integral part of the clinical screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of children with DDH. Optimal timing for imaging and appropriate use of imaging can reduce the incidence of late diagnoses and prevent iatrogenic complications. In general, ultrasound of the hips is recommended in infants under the age of 4 months while pelvic radiography is recommended in older infants due to the fact that the femoral head ossific nucleus typically is not formed until 4 to 6 months of age. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Appendicitis-Child.
- Author
-
Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:, Koberlein, George C, Trout, Andrew T, Rigsby, Cynthia K, Iyer, Ramesh S, Alazraki, Adina L, Anupindi, Sudha A, Bardo, Dianna M E, Brown, Brandon P, Chan, Sherwin S, Chandra, Tushar, Dillman, Jonathan R, Dorfman, Scott R, Falcone, Richard A Jr, Garber, Matthew D, Joseph, Madeline M, Nguyen, Jie C, Safdar, Nabile M, and Karmazyn, Boaz
- Abstract
Acute appendicitis represents the most common abdominal surgical urgency/emergency in children. Imaging remains a central tool in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and has been shown to facilitate management and decrease the rate of negative appendectomies. The initial consideration for imaging in a child with suspected acute appendicitis is based on clinical assessment, which can be facilitated with published scoring systems. The level of clinical risk (low, intermediate, high) and the clinical scenario (suspicion for complication) define the need for imaging and the optimal imaging modality. In some situations, no imaging is required, while in others ultrasound, CT, or MRI may be appropriate. This review frames the presentation of suspected acute appendicitis in terms of the clinical risk and also discusses the unique situations of the equivocal or nondiagnostic initial ultrasound examination and suspected appendicitis with suspicion for complication (eg, bowel obstruction). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hematuria-Child.
- Author
-
Dillman, Jonathan R., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Iyer, Ramesh S., Alazraki, Adina L., Anupindi, Sudha A., Brown, Brandon P., Chan, Sherwin S., Dorfman, Scott R., Jr.Falcone, Richard A., Garber, Matthew D., Nguyen, Jie C., Peters, Craig A., Safdar, Nabile M., Trout, Andrew T., Karmazyn, Boaz K., Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:, and Falcone, Richard A Jr
- Abstract
Hematuria is the presence of red blood cells in the urine, either visible to the eye (macroscopic hematuria) or as viewed under the microscope (microscopic hematuria). The clinical evaluation of children and adolescents with any form of hematuria begins with a meticulous history and thorough evaluation of the urine. The need for imaging evaluation depends on the clinical scenario in which hematuria presents, including the suspected etiology. Ultrasound and CT are the most common imaging methods used to assess hematuria in children, although other imaging modalities may be appropriate in certain instances. This review focuses on the following clinical variations of childhood hematuria: isolated hematuria (nonpainful, nontraumatic, and microscopic versus macroscopic), painful hematuria (ie, suspected nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis), and renal trauma with hematuria (microscopic versus macroscopic). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Physical Abuse-Child.
- Author
-
Wootton-Gorges, Sandra L., Soares, Bruno P., Alazraki, Adina L., Anupindi, Sudha A., Blount, Jeffrey P., Booth, Timothy N., Dempsey, Molly E., Jr.Falcone, Richard A., Hayes, Laura L., Kulkarni, Abhaya V., Partap, Sonia, Rigsby, Cynthia K., Ryan, Maura E., Safdar, Nabile M., Trout, Andrew T., Widmann, Roger F., Karmazyn, Boaz K., Palasis, Susan, Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:, and Falcone, Richard A Jr
- Abstract
The youngest children, particularly in the first year of life, are the most vulnerable to physical abuse. Skeletal survey is the universal screening examination in children 24 months of age and younger. Fractures occur in over half of abused children. Rib fractures may be the only abnormality in about 30%. A repeat limited skeletal survey after 2 weeks can detect additional fractures and can provide fracture dating information. The type and extent of additional imaging for pediatric patients being evaluated for suspected physical abuse depends on the age of the child, the presence of neurologic signs and symptoms, evidence of thoracic or abdominopelvic injuries, and social considerations. Unenhanced CT of the head is the initial study for suspected intracranial injury. Clinically occult abusive head trauma can occur, especially in young infants. Therefore, head CT should be performed in selected neurologically asymptomatic physical abuse patients. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen/pelvis is utilized for suspected intra-abdominal or pelvic injury. Particular attention should be paid to discrepancies between the patterns of injury and the reported clinical history. Making the diagnosis of child abuse also requires differentiation from anatomical and developmental variants and possible underlying metabolic and genetic conditions. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Urinary Tract Infection-Child.
- Author
-
Karmazyn, Boaz K., Alazraki, Adina L, Anupindi, Sudha A., Dempsey, Molly E., Dillman, Jonathan R., Dorfman, Scott R., Garber, Matthew D., Moore, Sheila G., Peters, Craig A., Rice, Henry E., Rigsby, Cynthia K., Safdar, Nabile M., Simoneaux, Stephen F., Trout, Andrew T., Westra, Sjirk J., Wootton-Gorges, Sandra L., Coley, Brian D., and Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:
- Abstract
Urinary tract infection (UTI) is common in young children and may cause pyelonephritis and renal scarring. Long-term complications from renal scarring are low. The role of imaging is to evaluate for underlying urologic abnormalities and guide treatment. In neonates there is increased risk for underlying urologic abnormalities. Evaluation for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) may be appropriate especially in boys because of higher prevalence of VUR and to exclude posterior urethral valve. In children older than 2 months with first episode of uncomplicated UTI, there is no clear benefit of prophylactic antibiotic. Ultrasound is the only study that is usually appropriate. After the age of 6 years, UTIs are infrequent. There is no need for routine imaging as VUR is less common. In children with recurrent or complicated UTI, in addition to ultrasound, imaging of VUR is usually appropriate. Renal cortical scintigraphy may be appropriate in children with VUR, as renal scarring may support surgical intervention. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.