Back to Search Start Over

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hematuria-Child.

Authors :
Dillman, Jonathan R.
Rigsby, Cynthia K.
Iyer, Ramesh S.
Alazraki, Adina L.
Anupindi, Sudha A.
Brown, Brandon P.
Chan, Sherwin S.
Dorfman, Scott R.
Jr.Falcone, Richard A.
Garber, Matthew D.
Nguyen, Jie C.
Peters, Craig A.
Safdar, Nabile M.
Trout, Andrew T.
Karmazyn, Boaz K.
Expert Panel on Pediatric Imaging:
Falcone, Richard A Jr
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology; May2018 Supplement, Vol. 15, pS91-S103, 1p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Hematuria is the presence of red blood cells in the urine, either visible to the eye (macroscopic hematuria) or as viewed under the microscope (microscopic hematuria). The clinical evaluation of children and adolescents with any form of hematuria begins with a meticulous history and thorough evaluation of the urine. The need for imaging evaluation depends on the clinical scenario in which hematuria presents, including the suspected etiology. Ultrasound and CT are the most common imaging methods used to assess hematuria in children, although other imaging modalities may be appropriate in certain instances. This review focuses on the following clinical variations of childhood hematuria: isolated hematuria (nonpainful, nontraumatic, and microscopic versus macroscopic), painful hematuria (ie, suspected nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis), and renal trauma with hematuria (microscopic versus macroscopic). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15461440
Volume :
15
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
129373614
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.022