Search

Global use of dexamethasone in COVID-19 patients has revealed a poor understanding of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of dexamethasone, particularly with antiretroviral agents (ARVs). Dexamethasone is both a substrate and a dose-dependent inducer of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). As many ARVs are substrates and/or inhibitors or inducers of CYP3A4, there is concern about DDIs with dexamethasone either as a perpetrator or a victim. Assessment of DDIs that involve dexamethasone is complex as dexamethasone is used at a range of daily doses (generally 0.5 up to 40 mg) and a treatment course can be short, long, or intermittent. Moreover, DDIs with dexamethasone have been evaluated only for a limited number of drugs. Here, we summarize the available in vitro and in vivo data on the interaction potential of dexamethasone and provide recommendations for the management of DDIs with ARVs, considering various dexamethasone dosages and treatment durations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Long-acting injectable antiretrovirals represent a pharmacological alternative to oral formulations and an innovative clinical option to address adherence and reduce drug costs. Clinical studies in children and adolescents are characterised by ethical and logistic barriers complicating the identification of dose optimisation. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling represents a valuable tool to inform dose finding prior to clinical trials. The objective of this study was to simulate potential dosing strategies for existing long-acting injectable depot formulations of cabotegravir and rilpivirine in children and adolescents (aged 3-18 years) using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling.Methods: Whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models were developed to represent the anatomical, physiological and molecular processes and age-related changes in children and adolescents through allometric equations. Models were validated for long-acting injectable intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine in adults. Subsequently, the anatomy and physiology of children and adolescents were validated against available literature. The optimal doses of monthly administration of cabotegravir and rilpivirine were identified in children and adolescents, to achieve trough concentrations over the target concentrations derived in a recent efficacy trial of the same formulations.Results: Pharmacokinetic data generated through the physiologically-based pharmacokinetic simulations were similar to observed clinical data in adults. Optimal doses of long-acting injectable antiretrovirals cabotegravir and rilpivirine were predicted using the release rate observed for existing clinical formulations, for different weight groups of children and adolescents. The intramuscular loading dose and maintenance dose of cabotegravir ranged from 200 to 600 mg and from 100 to 250 mg, respectively, and for rilpivirine it ranged from 250 to 550 mg and from 150 to 500 mg, respectively, across various weight groups of children ranging from 15 to 70 kg.Conclusions: The reported findings represent a rational platform for the identification of suitable dosing strategies and can inform prospective clinical investigation of long-acting injectable formulations in children and adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cabotegravir and rilpivirine are 2 long-acting (LA) antiretrovirals that can be administered intramuscularly; their interaction with rifampicin, a first-line antituberculosis agent, has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to simulate and predict drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between these LA antiretroviral agents and rifampicin using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.Methods: The designed PBPK models were qualified (according to European Medicines Agency guidelines) against observed data for oral formulations of cabotegravir, rilpivirine, and rifampicin. Induction potential of rifampicin was also qualified by comparing the DDI between oral cabotegravir and oral rilpivirine with rifampicin. Qualified PBPK models were utilized for pharmacokinetic prediction of DDIs.Results: PBPK models predicted a reduction in both area under the curve (AUC0-28 days) and trough concentration (Ctrough, 28th day) of LA cabotegravir of 41%-46% for the first maintenance dose coadministered with 600 mg once-daily oral rifampicin. Rilpivirine concentrations were predicted to decrease by 82% for both AUC0-28 days and Ctrough, 28th day following the first maintenance dose when coadministered with rifampicin.Conclusions: The developed PBPK models predicted the theoretical effect of rifampicin on cabotegravir and rilpivirine LA intramuscular formulations. According to these simulations, it is likely that coadministration of rifampicin with these LA formulations will result in subtherapeutic concentrations of both drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Co-administration of antineoplastics with ART is challenging due to potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs). However, trials specifically assessing such DDIs are lacking. Our objective was to simulate DDIs between the antineoplastics erlotinib and gefitinib with key antiretroviral drugs and to predict dose adjustments using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model.Methods: In vitro data describing chemical properties and pharmacokinetic processes of each drug and their effect on cytochrome P450 isoforms were obtained from the literature. Plasma drug-concentration profiles were simulated in a virtual population of 50 individuals receiving erlotinib or gefitinib alone or with darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz or etravirine. Simulated pharmacokinetic parameters and the magnitude of DDIs with probe drugs (midazolam, maraviroc) were compared with literature values. Erlotinib and gefitinib pharmacokinetics with and without antiretrovirals were compared and dose-adjustment strategies were evaluated.Results: Simulated parameters of each drug and the magnitude of DDIs with probe drugs were in agreement with reference values. Darunavir/ritonavir increased erlotinib and gefitinib exposure, while efavirenz and etravirine decreased erlotinib and gefitinib concentrations. Based on our predictions, dose-adjustment strategies may consist of once-daily dosing erlotinib at 25 mg and gefitinib at 125 mg with darunavir/ritonavir; or erlotinib at 200 mg and gefitinib at 375 mg with etravirine. The interaction with efavirenz was not overcome even after doubling erlotinib or gefitinib doses.Conclusions: PBPK models predicted the in vivo pharmacokinetics of erlotinib, gefitinib and the antiretrovirals darunavir/ritonavir, efavirenz and etravirine, and the DDIs between them. The simulated dose-adjustments may represent valuable strategies to optimize antineoplastic therapy in HIV-infected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of antiretrovirals as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly efficacious in HIV prevention. The World Health Organization recently recommended Truvada (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for high-risk individuals, with limited data for single-agent TDF PrEP in men who have sex with men (MSM). We report two cases of TDF PrEP failure in MSM who had received long-term TDF for hepatitis B infection and had therapeutic levels of drug immediately after HIV acquisition. Rapid antiretroviral intensification at diagnosis of acute HIV infection failed to limit immune dysfunction or prevent the establishment of a viral reservoir. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The antiretroviral drug efavirenz is widely used during breastfeeding. Evaluating its safety requires an understanding of its breast milk pharmacokinetics, level of breastfed infants' exposure, and potential influence of polymorphisms in drug disposition genes. Methods. For this observational study, we investigated plasma and breast milk pharmacokinetics of efavirenz and breastfed infants' exposure in human immunodeficiency virus positive nursing mothers and their breastfed infants. We also evaluated potential variability due to genetic polymorphisms in CYP2B6, NR1I3, CYP2A6, ABCB1, ABCB5, and ABCG2. Results. CYP2B6 516G>T was independently associated with efavirenz concentrations in maternal plasma, breast milk, and infant plasma (n = 134). When stratified based on CYP2B6 516G>T (n = 29 ; 11 GG, 10 GT and 8 TT), efavirenz pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma and breast milk differed significantly between patient groups. The median time-averaged milk-to-plasma concentration ratio was 1.10 (range: 0.57-1.71). The estimated maximum infant efavirenz dose from breast milk was 809 µg/kg/day (215-2760) and pediatric dose weight-adjusted exposure index was 4.05% (1.08-13.8). Infant plasma concentrations did not change significantly during the dosing interval, 157 ng/mL (28.6-1360) in pooled analysis and 315 ng/mL (108-1360) in CYP2B6 516TT group. Infant plasma concentrations were highest up to 8 days of age at 1590 ng/mL (190-4631) and decreased by about 90% in the age stratum day 9 to 3 months. No efavirenz related toxicity was reported. Conclusions. Most breastfed infants are exposed to <10% of the weight-adjusted therapeutic pediatric dose, the safety threshold for exposure to maternal drugs from breast milk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Antiretrovirals are currently used for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection. However, poor adherence and low tolerability of some existing oral formulations can hinder their efficacy. Long-acting (LA) injectable nanoformulations could help address these complications by simplifying antiretroviral administration. The aim of this study is to inform the optimisation of intramuscular LA formulations for eight antiretrovirals through physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling. Methods: A whole-body PBPK model was constructed using mathematical descriptions of molecular, physiological and anatomical processes defining pharmacokinetics. These models were validated against available clinical data and subsequently used to predict the pharmacokinetics of injectable LA formulations Results: The predictions suggest that monthly intramuscular injections are possible for dolutegravir, efavirenz, emtricitabine, raltegravir, rilpivirine and tenofovir provided that technological challenges to control their release rate can be addressed. Conclusions: These data may help inform the target product profiles for LA antiretroviral reformulation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antiretroviral safety and efficacy and may differ in older versus younger HIV-infected patients. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in older HIV-infected subjects (>60 years) switching combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) to a raltegravir (RAL) containing regimen. Methods: Nineteen HIV-infected patients over 60 years of age on effective cART (HIV-RNA < 50 copies/ml) were enrolled in this prospective 24-week study. On day 1, patients switched to tenofovir/emtricitabine (245/200 mg once daily) and RAL (400 mg twice daily). On day 28, intensive PK sampling was undertaken in a fasted state and RAL plasma concentrations determined. Neurocognitive function was assessed at baseline and week 24 using a neuropsychological battery. RAL PK parameters were compared to those of two younger historical HIV-infected control groups that received twice-daily RAL co-administered with darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 once daily by nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Results: In HIV-infected subjects over the age of 60 (mean ± SD age: 66 ± 3.4 years, n = 19) switching to a RAL containing regimen, we observed no safety concerns, no plasma virological rebounds, and no differences in RAL apparent oral clearance when compared to younger HIV-infected populations (mean ± SD age: 41 ± 9.2 years, n = 38) based on population pharmacokinetic analysis. After 24 weeks of study therapy a decline in cognitive function was observed [change in (SD) global score of (0.91 (1.3), P = 0.018]. Conclusions: No significant changes in RAL exposure associated with age were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: In clinical practice, antiretroviral regimens are often interrupted or modified for intolerance and toxicity. The objective of this study was to develop an in vitro to in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) approach to describe the interaction when efavirenz is switched to either maraviroc or nevirapine and to test different switching scenarios to identify the best strategy. Methods: In vitro data describing the chemical and absorption, tissue distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) characteristics of efavirenz, maraviroc and nevirapine were obtained from the literature, and used to simulate plasma exposures of these drugs using the Simcyp Population-Based Simulator. The predicted maraviroc and nevirapine exposures were compared with data from clinical studies evaluating their exposures following a switch from efavirenz. Results: Model predictions for maraviroc and nevirapine exposure were in agreement with observed data. The simulations suggest that the waning efavirenz induction effect following discontinuation necessitated increasing maraviroc to 600 mg twice daily for 1 week after efavirenz cessation. Alternatively, adequate exposure of maraviroc was shown with a dose of 450 mg for 2 weeks. Efavirenz waning induction did not affect nevirapine exposure. Conclusion: IVIVE modelling successfully predicted patient drug exposure. This modelling technique is able to inform the design of clinical studies, and allows assessment of pragmatic dosing strategies under complex therapeutic scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Pharmacokinetic parameters following modifications to antiretroviral therapy and sanctuary site exposure are often unknown for recently licensed antiretrovirals. We assessed plasma, CSF and seminal plasma (SP) exposure of rilpivirine after switching from nevirapine. Methods HIV-infected male subjects receiving tenofovir/emtricitabine/nevirapine (245/200/400 mg) once daily switched to tenofovir/emtricitabine/rilpivirine (245/200/25 mg) once daily for 60 days when CSF and semen samples were collected. Mean and individual plasma concentrations of nevirapine and rilpivirine were compared with the proposed plasma target concentration for nevirapine (3000 ng/mL) and the protein binding-adjusted EC90 for rilpivirine (12.1 ng/mL). Mean rilpivirine CSF and SP concentrations were calculated and individual values compared with the EC50 and EC90 for wild-type virus (0.27 and 0.66 ng/mL, respectively). Results Of 13 subjects completing study procedures including CSF examination, 8 provided seminal samples. By day 3, the mean plasma rilpivirine trough concentration was 29.7 ng/mL (95% CI: 23.8–37). No patient presented rilpivirine plasma concentrations under the proposed threshold. The mean rilpivirine concentration in CSF was 0.8 ng/mL (95% CI: 0.7–1.0), representing a CSF : plasma ratio of 1.4%, with concentrations above the EC90 in 85% (11/13) of patients. In SP, the mean rilpivirine concentration was 4.9 ng/mL (95% CI: 3.3–7.2), representing an SP : plasma ratio of 9.5%, with all concentrations above the EC90. Conclusions Switching from nevirapine- to rilpivirine-containing antiretroviral therapy was safe and well tolerated, with plasma rilpivirine concentrations above the protein binding-adjusted EC90 in all subjects. Rilpivirine concentrations were always above the EC50 in the CSF and the EC90 in SP. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background Once-daily nucleoside-sparing combination antiretroviral therapy regimens are attractive options for the treatment of HIV infection. However, the pharmacokinetic profiles of such regimens are often not established. Methods HIV-infected subjects receiving 245/200 mg of tenofovir/emtricitabine plus 800/100 mg of darunavir/ritonavir once daily with plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL were eligible. On day 1 (period 1), 150 mg of maraviroc daily was added and on day 11 (period 2), tenofovir/emtricitabine discontinued. At steady-state (days 10 and 20), intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken. We assessed (i) the number of subjects with trough (Ctrough) and average (Cavg) maraviroc concentrations <25 and <75 ng/mL, respectively; (ii) geometric mean (GM) ratios for pharmacokinetic parameters for period 2 versus period 1; and (iii) factors associated with total maraviroc exposure. Results Eleven subjects completed the study procedures (mean age 49 years; range 35–59 years). In three subjects, maraviroc Ctrough and Cavg were <25 and <75 ng/mL, respectively (Cavg, 68 ng/mL and Ctrough, 14 and 21 ng/mL). Although not statistically significant, a trend was observed towards lower maraviroc, darunavir and ritonavir concentrations in period 2 versus period 1; total maraviroc exposure was 3579 ng· h/mL (95% CI: 2983–4294) and 2996 ng· h/mL (95% CI: 2374–3782) in periods 1 and 2, respectively, and the GM ratio was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.67–1.05). Only total ritonavir exposure was significantly associated with total maraviroc exposure (P = 0.049; 95% CI: 0.01–0.91). No clinical safety concerns were observed. Conclusions Within this novel nucleoside-sparing regimen, maraviroc exposure is dependent on ritonavir exposure, which was slightly reduced in the absence of tenofovir/emtricitabine. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Cerebrospinal (CSF) fluid biomarkers may be a useful tool for assessing the cerebral effects of antiretroviral therapy. Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between 4 CSF chemokines with maraviroc exposure and cerebral metabolite ratios (CMR) measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in HIV-infected individuals following maraviroc intensification. Methods: CSF concentration of maraviroc and 4 chemokines (MCP-1, IP-10, MCP-4, and MIP-1β), plasma concentration of maraviroc pre-CSF assessment, and right basal ganglia CMR were assessed in 12 male HIV-infected, neuro-asymptomatic adults after 14 days of antiretroviral therapy intensification with maraviroc 150 mg twice daily. The relationship between CSF analytes with both CMRs and plasma and CSF maraviroc concentrations were examined using Spearman correlation coef-ficient. Results: Twelve subjects completed study procedures with baseline values as follows: mean (SD) age 42 (8) years, CD4+ cell count 503 (199) cells/µL, and plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL in most subjects. Mean (range, pg/mL) chemo-kine concentrations were IP-10, 1242 (190-8073); MCP-4, 6.52 (1-18); MCP-1, 702 (201-1618); and MIP-1β, 42 (5-153). IP-10, MCP-4, and MIP-1β were significantly associated with CMRs in the right basal ganglia with (1) lower concentrations of IP-10 correlating with higher N-acetyl aspartate to creatine ratios (NAA/Cr) and (2) higher concentrations of MCP-4 and MIP-1β correlating with higher myoinositol to creatine (mI/Cr) ratios. There were no significant associations with MCP-1. Finally lower concentrations of IP-10 were significantly associated with higher maravi-roc plasma trough concentration (r = -0.629,P = .028) but not CSF concentration (r = -0.308,P = .331). Conclusion: We hypothesize that the relationship between IP-10, MCP-4, and MIP-1β with maraviroc exposure and CMRs may be associated with a direct cerebral effect of maraviroc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives We designed two different studies to evaluate two different combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) stopping strategies namely a ‘staggered stop’ approach (STOP 1 study) and a ‘protected stop’ approach (STOP 2 study) to find the best ‘universal stop’ strategy. Patients and methods Patients who stopped cART for any reason were recruited. In STOP 1, 10 patients on efavirenz continued dual nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for 1 week after discontinuing efavirenz. Efavirenz concentrations were measured weekly for up to 3 weeks. In STOP 2, 20 patients stopped their cART and replaced it with two tablets of lopinavir/ritonavir (Kaletra) (100/50 mg) twice daily for 4 weeks. Lopinavir, efavirenz, nevirapine and tenofovir concentrations were measured weekly for up to 4 weeks. Virological and resistance testing were performed. Results In STOP 1 five patients still had efavirenz present (median t1/2 = 148.4 h) 3 weeks after stopping. In STOP 2, 15/20 patients had a viral load (VL) of <40 copies/mL and 3/20 patients had a reduction in VL by 4 weeks. Six patients opted not to stop lopinavir/ritonavir and still had <40 copies/mL at week 8. Week 1–4 median trough lopinavir concentrations were well above the EC95. Six patients still had detectable concentrations of original cART persisting for >1 week after stopping. No patients developed new resistance mutations. Conclusions Plasma efavirenz concentrations can persist up to 3 weeks after patients stop efavirenz-containing regimens. This suggests a strategy of stopping efavirenz only 1 week before NRTIs may not be long enough for some individuals. The use of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy for a 4 week period may be an alternative pharmacologically and virologically effective universal stopping strategy which warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives To compare the use of co-medication, the potential drug–drug interactions (PDDIs) and the effect on antiretroviral therapy (ART) tolerability and efficacy in HIV-infected individuals according to age, ≥50 years or <50 years. Methods All ART-treated participants were prospectively included once during a follow-up visit of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. Information on any current medication was obtained by participant self-report and medical prescription history. The complete treatment was subsequently screened for PDDIs using a customized version of the Liverpool drug interaction database. Results Drug prescriptions were analysed for 1497 HIV-infected individuals: 477 age ≥50 and 1020 age <50. Older patients were more likely to receive one or more co-medications compared with younger patients (82% versus 61%; P < 0.001) and thus had more frequent PDDIs (51% versus 35%; P < 0.001). Furthermore, older patients tended to use a higher number of co-medications and certain therapeutic drug classes more often, such as cardiovascular drugs (53% versus 19%; P < 0.001), gastrointestinal medications (10% versus 6%; P = 0.004) and hormonal agents (6% versus 3%; P = 0.04). PDDIs with ART occurred mainly with cardiovascular drugs (27%), CNS agents (22%) and methadone (6%) in older patients and with CNS agents (27%), methadone (15%) and cardiovascular drugs (11%) in younger patients. The response to ART did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions The risk for PDDIs with ART increased in older patients who take more drugs than their younger HIV-infected counterparts. However, medication use in older and younger patients did not differ in terms of effect on antiretroviral tolerability and response. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background Nevirapine is metabolized by CYP2B6 and polymorphisms within the CYP2B6 gene partly explain inter-patient variability in pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study was to model the complex relationship between nevirapine exposure, weight and genetics (based on combined analysis of CYP2B6 516G > T and 983T > C single nucleotide polymorphisms). Methods Non-linear mixed-effects modelling was used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters from 275 patients. Simulations of the nevirapine concentration profile were performed with dosing regimens of 200 mg twice daily and 400 mg once daily for individuals with body weights of 50, 70 and 90 kg in combination with CYP2B6 genetic variation. Results A one-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data. Population clearance was 3.5 L/h with inter-patient variability of 24.6%. 516T homozygosity and 983C heterozygosity were associated with 37% and 40% lower clearance, respectively. Body weight was the only significant demographic factor influencing clearance, which increased by 5% for every 10 kg increase. For individuals with higher body weight, once-daily nevirapine was associated with a greater risk of sub-therapeutic drug exposure than a twice-daily regimen. This risk was offset in individuals who were 516T homozygous or 983C heterozygous in which drug exposure was optimal for > 95% of patients with body weight of ≤70 kg. Conclusions The data suggest that a 400 mg once-daily dose could be implemented in accordance with CYP2B6 polymorphism and body weight. However, the use of nevirapine once daily (immediate release; off-label) in the absence of therapeutic drug monitoring is not recommended due to the risk of inadequate exposure to nevirapine in a high proportion of patients. There are different considerations for the extended-release formulation (nevirapine XR) that demonstrate minimal peak-to-trough fluctuations in plasma nevirapine levels. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objectives: Data suggest that some licensed antiretroviral doses could be reduced. We assessed the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir at doses of 400/100, 200/150 and 200/50 mg twice daily in HIV-negative volunteers (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00985543).Methods: Male and female volunteers were administered lopinavir/ritonavir at doses of 400/100 mg (two lopinavir/ritonavir Meltrex 200/50 mg tablets, Regimen 1), 200/150 mg (one Meltrex tablet, one 100 mg ritonavir capsule, Regimen 2) and 200/50 mg (one Meltrex tablet, Regimen 3). Each dose was given twice daily for 7 days sequentially, separated by a 7 day wash-out period. Lopinavir/ritonavir steady-state pharmacokinetics was assessed over 12 h at the end of each phase (days 7, 21 and 35). Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using the 400/100 mg twice daily dose as reference, by determining geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals.Results: Twenty-two subjects (eight females) completed the study. Lopinavir AUC(0-12) (ng h/mL), C(max) (ng/mL) and the minimum concentration (C(trough)) (ng/mL) for the 400/100, 200/150 and 200/50 mg twice daily doses, respectively, were as follows: 99,599, 73,603 and 45,146; 11,965, 8939 and 6404; and 5776, 4293 and 1749. Lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters were significantly lower for Regimens 2 and 3: GMR (90% CI) AUC(0-12), 0.74 (0.65-0.84) and 0.45 (0.40-0.51); C(max), 0.75 (0.66-0.85) and 0.54 (0.40-0.60); and C(trough), 0.74 (0.62-0.89) and 0.30 (0.25-0.36), respectively. All subjects taking the 400/100 and 200/150 mg twice daily doses, and 19 (86%) subjects taking 200/50 mg twice daily had lopinavir concentrations above the suggested minimum effective concentration of 1000 ng/mL.Conclusions: These pharmacokinetic data show that therapeutic plasma concentrations of lopinavir can be achieved with 200/150 mg of lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily (one Meltrex tablet and one 100 mg ritonavir capsule twice daily). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in the development of agents that act specifically to inhibit hepatitis C virus (HCV) are set to fundamentally change the way that patients will be treated. New directly acting anti-HCV agents such as protease and polymerase inhibitors will initially be added to standard of care with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin. However, future therapy is likely to constitute combinations of agents which act at distinct stages of viral replication and have differing resistance profiles. While directly acting anti-HCV agents will undoubtedly improve treatment outcomes, the introduction of combination therapy may not be without complications in some patient groups. HIV-positive patients who are receiving antiretrovirals (ARVs) are relatively highly represented among those with HCV infection, and are at high risk of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). As combination anti-HCV treatment gradually evolves to resemble anti-HIV therapy, it is essential to consider the increased potential for DDIs in patients receiving combination anti-HCV therapy, and particularly in HCV/HIV-co-infected individuals. Therapeutic drug monitoring is likely to play a role in the clinical management of such interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Interaction of antiretrovirals with drug transporters such as P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and solute carrier organic anion transporter (SLCO) may influence the emergence of viral mutants by altering intracellular drug concentrations. Here we characterize the effect of transporter expression in a variety of cell types such as control CEM, CEMVBL (P-gp-overexpressing), CEME1000 (MRP1-overexpressing), MT4, control MDCKII, MDCKIIMDR1 (P-gp-overexpressing) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) on the uptake of [14C]efavirenz and [3H]nevirapine. We also investigated the lipophilicity of [14C]efavirenz and [3H]nevirapine. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Antiretroviral protease inhibitors such as lopinavir and saquinavir have been shown to be substrates of ABCB1. Co-administration with the potent ABCB1 and CYP3A4 inhibitor, ritonavir, has shown improved pharmacokinetics and subsequent therapeutic effects of protease inhibitors. Darunavir is a recently licensed protease inhibitor with potent antiretroviral effects but has yet to be characterized as a potential substrate for drug transporters. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • Darunavir was shown to be a substrate of ABCB1 using different in vitro models. Inhibition of ABCB1 alone does not increase cellular accumulation of darunavir in PBMCs. However, inhibition of ABCB1 and ABCCs significantly increased cellular accumulation of darunavir whereas inhibition of influx transporters significantly reduced the cellular accumulation of darunavir in PBMCs. AIMS ABCB1, some ABCCs and SLCOs have been reported to affect the intracellular accumulation of various protease inhibitors in vitro and ex vivo. Darunavir is the most recently licensed protease inhibitor and we sought to investigate the ability of transport inhibitors to influence its intracellular accumulation in lymphocytes from healthy volunteers. METHODS The intracellular accumulation of radiolabelled darunavir was assessed using CEM cells and ABCB1-overexpressing CEMVBL cells. Apical and basolateral transport of radiolabelled darunavir through MDCKII monolayers was also studied. Finally the ability of known inhibitors to influence intracellular accumulation of darunavir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was investigated. RESULTS CEMVBL cells (1.4 ± 0.6, P < 0.001, 95% CI for the difference = 0.46, 0.80, n= 7) had significantly lower accumulation of darunavir compared with CEM cells (5.6 ± 0.7, n= 7) and this was reversed by addition of tariquidar (30 nm, 4.6 ± 0.8, P < 0.001, 95% CI =−0.64, −0.41, n= 4). In MDCKII-ABCBI cells, transport from the basal to the apical compartment was observed and this was also reversible with the addition of tariquidar. In PBMCs, dipyridamole (6.9 ± 1.3, P < 0.01, 95% CI for the difference =−1.16, −0.30, ( n= 8) significantly increased whilst montelukast (5.7 ± 1.0, P < 0.01, 95% CI for the difference = 0.16, 0.79, n= 8) significantly decreased the intracellular accumulation of darunavir when compared with control (6.2 ± 1.1, n= 8). CONCLUSIONS Darunavir is a substrate for efflux and influx transporters in PBMC and intracellular concentrations can be manipulated using known inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Tenofovir is one of the most widely used antiretroviral drugs. Tenofovir undergoes renal clearance by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion. Although rare, the mechanism by which tenofovir causes renal damage is not well characterized. We have explored the association between kidney tubular dysfunction (KTD) and polymorphisms in genes encoding drug transporters. Methods. All consecutive, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients receiving tenofovir-containing antiretroviral regimens who were seen at a single institution during the first trimester of 2008 were enrolled in the study. KTD was defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following abnormalities: nondiabetic glucosuria, urine phosphate wasting, hyperaminoaciduria, β2-microglobulinuria, and increased fractional excretion of uric acid. Twelve single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the ABCC2, ABCC4, SCL22A6, SLC22A11, and ABCB1 genes were analyzed using TaqMan 5′-nuclease assays. Results. A total of 115 HIV-infected patients were examined, of whom 19 (16.5%) had KTD. The percentage of patients with KTD was higher among those with genotype CC at position -24 of ABCC2 than among those with genotypes CT and TT (24% [16 of 68 patients] vs. 6% [3 of 47 patients]; Pp.020). In a multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.2; Pp.024), lower body weight (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9; Pp.048), and genotype CC at ABCC2 position -24 (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.2-21; Pp.027) were independently associated with KTD. Conclusions. Approximately 17% of HIV-infected patients treated with tenofovir had KTD. Homozygosity for the C allele at position -24 of the ABCC2 gene was strongly associated with KTD in this population. This polymorphism may help to identify patients at greater risk for developing tenofovir-associated tubulopathy, and close monitoring of renal function is warranted for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate whether the administration of tenofovir diproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily alters the plasma pharmacokinetics of the saquinavir hard gel/ritonavir combination in HIV-1 infected individuals.On day 1, 12 h pharmacokinetic profiles for saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg given twice daily) were obtained for 18 subjects. All subjects were receiving ongoing treatment with a saquinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. Tenofovir diproxil fumarate 300 mg given once daily was then added to the regimen and blood sampling was repeated at days 3 and 14. Saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations were measured by HPLC–MS/MS, and tenofovir concentrations by HPLC with UV detection.Following the addition of tenofovir diproxil fumarate to the regimen, saquinavir and ritonavir plasma concentrations were not significantly different compared with day 1. Thus the geometric mean ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the area under the concentration-time curve were 1.16 (0.97, 1.59) and 0.99 (0.87, 1.30) for saquinavir and 1.05 (0.92, 1.28) and 1.08 (0.97, 1.30) for ritonavir, on days 3 and 14, respectively.Tenofovir diproxil fumarate did not alter the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard gel/ritonavir. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scale-up of HIV treatment services may have contributed to an increase in functional health facilities available in resource-limited settings and an increase in patient use of facilities and retention in care. As more patients are reached with medicines, monitoring patient safety is increasingly important. Limited data from resource-limited settings suggest that medication error and antiretroviral drug–drug interactions may pose a significant risk to patient safety. Commonly cited causes of medication error in the developed world include the speed and complexity of the medication use cycle combined with inadequate systems and processes. In resource-limited settings, specific factors may contribute, such as inadequate human resources and high disease burden. Management of drug–drug interactions may be complicated by limited access to alternative medicines or laboratory monitoring. Improving patient safety by addressing the issue of antiretroviral drug–drug interactions has the potential not just to improve healthcare for individuals, but also to strengthen health systems and improve vital communication among healthcare providers and with regulatory agencies. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

We assessed the risk of clinically significant drug interactions in patients receiving antiretrovirals, and their recognition by physicians. Clinically significant drug interactions were recorded in 27% of 159 patients, with 15% of interactions potentially lowering antiretroviral concentrations. Risk of clinically significant drug interactions was significantly related to receipt of protease inhibitors. Only 36% of clinically significant drug interactions were correctly identified by physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Introduction Sub-dermal hormone implants, such as levonorgestrel (LNG), are a safe and desirable form of long-acting contraception, but their use among HIV-positive women on antiretroviral therapy (ART) may be compromised given the potential for a cytochrome P450 3A-mediated drug-drug interaction. Our study aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of LNG released from a sub-dermal implant over six months in HIV-positive Ugandan women on nevirapine (NVP)- or efavirenz (EFV)-based ART. Material and Methods This non-randomized, parallel group study compared LNG pharmacokinetics between HIV-positive Ugandan women not yet eligible for ART (control group, n=18) and those on stable NVP- ( n=20) or EFV- ( n=20) based ART. The two-rod (75 mg/rod) LNG sub-dermal implant was inserted at study enrolment. LNG sampling was obtained pre-implant and at weeks 1, 4, 12 and 24 post-insertion. LNG concentrations were analyzed using a validated LC-MS/MS method, with an assay calibration range of 50-1500 pg/mL. Safety monitoring, including a pregnancy test, was conducted at each study visit. Results At enrolment, participants had a mean age of 31 years; CD4+ cell counts were similar between the control, NVP and EFV groups (758, 645 and 568 cells/mm3, respectively; p=0.09); all women in the NVP and EFV groups had an undetectable HIV-RNA. Women in the control group had a higher baseline body weight (73 kg) compared to those in the NVP (63 kg; p=0.03) or EFV groups (60 kg; p<0.01). By linear regression, weight was a significant predictor of LNG concentrations (1 kg increase in weight=5 pg/mL decrease in LNG, p=0.03). LNG concentrations are reported in the table. Conclusions Over a 24-week period, LNG concentrations were 40-54% lower in women on EFV-based ART, despite their having a significantly lower body weight, compared to those not on ART. In women on NVP-based ART, LNG concentrations were 32-39% higher than those observed in the control group, a difference partially explained by body weight. These data confirm a significant drug interaction occurs between the LNG implant and EFV, adding to growing concern for reduced contraceptive efficacy with their combined use. In contrast, these data support use of the LNG implant with NVP-based ART. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with HIV who are receiving antiretroviral (ARV) therapy are at high risk for drug–drug interactions (DDIs), which can significantly impact patient care and represent a substantial opportunity cost for healthcare systems. DDIs are prevalent in the developed world and in resource-poor settings, with the cost being potentially greater in the latter. Although practically unavoidable in HIV care, many DDIs can be better managed, reducing the risks to patients and the burden on resources. The scope for DDI management is likely to be greater in the developed world, due to the availability of new agents and second-line drugs, which allow greater flexibility of ARV regimens and co-administered drug choice. The advent of electronic prescribing and patient medication records represents an opportunity to aid the identification and management of DDIs. Searchable electronic databases of HIV drug interactions are available, which are a useful tool for HIV healthcare professionals and non-specialists for managing DDIs involving ARVs. Although general active systems that alert prescribers to DDIs currently exist, there is an indication for the development of specialist active databases to be incorporated into electronic prescribing or dispensing systems, with the aim of improving the quality of prescribing and the safe dispensing of the therapeutically risky drugs and complicated regimens used in HIV management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim of this study was to develop and validate a population pharmacokinetic model to: (i) describe ritonavir-boosted atazanavir concentrations (300/100 mg once daily) and identify important covariates; and (ii) evaluate the predictive performance of the model for lower, unlicensed atazanavir doses (150 and 200 mg once daily) boosted with ritonavir (100 mg once daily). Methods Non-linear mixed effects modelling was applied to determine atazanavir pharmacokinetic parameters, inter-individual variability (IIV) and residual error. Covariates potentially related to atazanavir pharmacokinetics were explored. The final model was assessed by means of a visual predictive check for 300/100, 200/100 and 150/100 mg once daily. Results Forty-six individuals were included (30 HIV-infected). A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and lag-time best described the data. Final estimates of apparent oral clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F) and absorption rate constant [relative standard error (%) and IIV (%)] were 7.7 L/h (5, 29), 103 L (13, 48) and 3.4 h−1 (34, 154); a lag-time of 0.96 h (1) was determined. Ritonavir area under the curve (AUC0–24) was the only significant covariate. Overall, 94%–97% of observed concentrations were within the 95% prediction intervals for all three regimens. Conclusions A population pharmacokinetic model for ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has been developed and validated. Ritonavir AUC0–24 was significantly associated with atazanavir CL/F. The model was used to investigate other, particularly lower, ritonavir-boosted atazanavir dosing strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: An estimated 4 to 5 million people are co-infected with HIV/HCV worldwide. Recently observed outbreaks of acute HCV infection among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) have been linked to behavioral factors such as high risk sexual practices and recreational drug use. However, at the molecular level, many drugs such as glucocorticoids or cyclosporine A have been found to modulate viral replication. Thus, it is conceivable that drugs used in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may heighten susceptibility to HCV infection and contribute to the recent outbreaks. We therefore performed a comprehensive screen of antiretroviral drugs covering all available drug classes both individually and in typical combinations used during HAART to probe for direct effects on HCV cell entry, replication, new particle assembly and release. Importantly, no significant enhancement or inhibition of HCV cell entry, replication or new particle production was detected. While raltegravir and ritonavir boosted atazanavir reduce HCV replication, a tenfold reduction of HCVcc entry by the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc was observed. In conclusion, commonly used HAART agents do not specifically enhance HCV replication. Thus recent epidemic outbreaks of acute HCV in HIV-infected MSM are unlikely to be related to enhancing effects of HAART drugs. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Current antiretroviral treatment has allowed HIV infection to become a chronic manageable condition with many HIV patients living longer. However, available antiretrovirals are not without limitations, for example the development of resistance and adverse effects. Consequently, new drugs in existing and novel classes are urgently required to provide viable treatment options to patients with few remaining choices. Darunavir, etravirine, maraviroc and raltegravir have been recently approved for treatment-experienced patients and other agents such as rilpivirine, vicriviroc and elvitegravir are currently under phase III study. Clinical studies are necessary to optimise potential treatment combinations and to manage drug–drug interactions to help avoid toxicity or therapy failure. This review aims to summarise the pharmacokinetics and key drug–drug interaction studies for newly available antiretrovirals and those in development. Further information regarding drug–drug interactions of well established antiretrovirals and those recently approved are readily available online at sites such as http://www.hiv-druginteractions.org, http://www.clinicaloptions.com/hiv, http://hivinsite.ucsf.edu. This article forms part of a special issue of Antiviral Research marking the 25th anniversary of antiretroviral drug discovery and development, Vol 85, issue 1, 2010. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study which discusses the effect of pregnancy on steady-state nevirapine pharmacokinetics (PK). It mentions that the Ugandan pregnant women were tested who are receiving nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy. The authors concluded that the exposure to nevirapine were reduced during the third trimester of pregnant Ugandan women and asserts that the long-term impact of intermittent supoptimal nevirapine concentrations during pregnancy is unknown.

Abstract: Clinical pharmacokinetic studies of antiretrovirals require accurate and precise measurement of plasma drug concentrations. Here we describe a simple, fast and sensitive HPLC–MS/MS method for determination of the commonly used protease inhibitors (PI) amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) nevirapine, as well as the more recent antiretrovirals, the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc and the “second generation” NNRTI etravirine and rilpivirine. An internal standard (quinoxalone; QX) was added to plasma aliquots (100μl) prior to protein precipitation with acetonitrile (500μl) followed by centrifugation and addition of 0.05% formic acid (200μl) to the supernatant. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a gradient (acetonitrile and 0.05% formic acid) mobile phase on a reverse-phase C18 column. Detection was via selective reaction monitoring (SRM) operating in positive ionization mode on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. All compounds eluted within a 5min run time. Calibration curves were validated over concentration ranges reflecting therapeutic concentrations observed in HIV-infected patients from pharmacokinetic data reported in the literature. Correlation coefficients (r 2) exceeded 0.998. Inter- and intra-assay variation ranged between 1% and 10% and % recovery exceeded 90% for all analytes. The method described is being successfully applied to measure plasma antiretroviral concentrations from samples obtained from clinical pharmacokinetic studies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]