Search

Purpose/background: The favorable effect of clozapine on psychotic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant (TR) schizophrenia (SCZ) in short-term studies is well established. However, prospective studies of the long-term outcome of clozapine treatment on psychopathology, cognition, quality of life, and functional outcome in TR-SCZ are limited., Methods/procedures: Here, we have examined the long-term (mean duration of follow-up 14 years) effects of clozapine on those outcomes in a prospective, open label study in 54 TR-SCZ patients. Assessments were performed at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, and at the last follow-up., Findings/results: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total, positive symptoms, and anxiety/depression at the last follow-up improved significantly from baseline, as well as from the 6-month evaluation ( P < 0.0001), with a 70.5% responder rate (≥20% improvement at the last follow-up from baseline). Quality of Life Scale (QLS) total improved by 72% at the last follow-up, with 24% of patients rated as having "good" functioning compared with 0% at baseline. Suicidal thoughts/behavior was significantly reduced at the last follow-up from the baseline. No significant change in negative symptoms was found at the last follow-up in the total sample. Short-term memory function declined at the last follow-up from baseline, but there was no significant change in processing speed. The QLS total showed a significant negative correlation with BPRS positive symptoms but not with cognitive measures, or negative symptoms, at the last follow-up., Implications/conclusions: For patients with TR-SCZ, improving psychotic symptoms with clozapine seems to have a more significant impact than negative symptoms or cognition on improving psychosocial function., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/background: Prolonged ventricular repolarization, measured by heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation, might be a biomarker for risk of torsade de pointes (TdP) and sudden cardiac death. However, the predictive value of QTc has been challenged, and a component of QTc, peak-to-end of the T-wave (Tpe), and a high Tpe/QT ratio might be superior biomarkers because they better reflect increased transmural dispersion of ventricular myocyte repolarization, which can lead to TDP. The purpose of this pilot study was to provide the first measurements of heart rate, QTc, Tpe, Tpe/QTc, and their variability over 24 hours in medication-free patients with schizophrenia, during treatment with ziprasidone or other antipsychotic drugs, and healthy controls., Methods: Subjects included 12 patients treated with ziprasidone, 30 treated with other antipsychotic drugs, 3 unmedicated patients, and 15 normal controls. Subjects underwent 24-hour analog Holter recording, and the recordings were digitized. A cardiologist blind to treatment selected multiple 10-cycle segments throughout each recording and measured the electrocardiogram metrics., Results: Variability in QTc, Tpe, and Tpe/QTc over the 24 hours was present in all groups; 91.1% of patients and 100% of controls had 1 or more QTc values of 450 milliseconds or greater. Mean QTc length was significantly greater in the ziprasidone-treated than the non-ziprasidone-treated patients (P = 0.02). Mean Tpe was not elevated in the ziprasidone patients, whereas mean Tpe/QTc was lower (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The large variability in QTc, Tpe, and Tpe/QTc observed supports the need for 24-hour electrocardiogram recordings to provide an accurate assessment of risk of TdP. Heart rate-corrected QT interval alone does not capture the risk of TdP.

Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that a common functional variant in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), Val66Met, which has been shown to be associated with increased body mass index (BMI) in schizophrenia (SCZ) and schizoaffective disorder (SAD), is also associated with antipsychotic-induced weight gain in bipolar disorder (BPD). Association of Val66Met with other metabolic measures, including high- and low-density cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1c, was also tested., Methods: This was a 12-month, prospective, randomized trial of two atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs) with moderate (risperidone) or high (olanzapine) risk to cause weight gain. Subjects were diagnosed as having BPD (n = 90) and SCZ or SAD (n = 76)., Results: BMI was significantly greater in all diagnoses for Met66 allele carriers at six months (p = 0.01). Met66 carriers with BPD showed a greater increase in the triglycerides/high-density (HDL) cholesterol ratio (p = 0.01), a key marker for metabolic syndrome related to insulin resistance, and log-triglycerides (p = 0.04), after three or six months of treatment. Met66 carriers had the greatest increase in log-triglycerides (p = 0.03) and triglycerides/HDL cholesterol ratio after three months of treatment with risperidone (p = 0.003), and the highest BMI at six months (p = 0.01)., Conclusions: The positive association of BNDF Val66Met with high BMI values replicates previous findings in patients with SCZ and indicates the BDNF Val66Met genotype as a potential risk factor for obesity and insulin resistance measures in patients with BPD receiving antipsychotics as well., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

It has been suggested that atypical antipsychotic drugs (A-APDs) other than clozapine may be effective to improve positive symptoms in some patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), if both the dose is higher, and the duration of the trial longer, than those which have been ineffective in non-TRS (NTRS) patients. This hypothesis was tested with long acting injectable risperidone (Risperdal Consta®, RLAI). One hundred sixty TRS patients selected for persistent moderate-severe delusions or hallucinations, or both, were randomized to RLAI, 50 or 100mg biweekly, in a six month, outpatient, double-blind, multicenter trial. We hypothesized that RLAI, 100mg, would be more effective than RLAI, 50mg. However, both doses produced clinically significant and equivalent improvement in PANSS Total, Positive, and Negative subscale scores, as well as key cognitive, global and functional measures, with increasing response during the course of the study, confirming the value of longer clinical trial duration for patients with TRS, but not superiority of the higher dose. The overall response rate was comparable to that previously reported for clozapine and high dose olanzapine, another A-APD, in TRS. Both doses of RLAI were equally well tolerated, producing minimal extrapyramidal side effects and few drop outs. Plasma levels of the active moiety, risperidone+9-hydroxyrisperidone, during treatment with RLAI 100mg, were comparable to those for 6-8 mg/day oral risperidone, which have not been effective in TRS. Further study of RLAI, ≥ 50-100mg biweekly, should compare it with clozapine and oral risperidone in TRS, with duration of treatment ≥ six months., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We studied the effects of switching antipsychotic drug-treated patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who evidenced adverse metabolic side effects as indicated by a triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein ratio (TG/HDL) ≥ 3.5 to aripiprazole (ARIP; 5-30 mg/day, n = 24) or ziprasidone (ZIP; 40-160 mg/day, n = 28). Anthropometric and metabolic measures, psychopathology, quality of life and motor adverse effects were assessed over a 52-week period with evaluations at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. There were statistically significant improvements in body weight, body mass index (BMI), TG, HDL and TG/HDL which did not differ between treatments. However, numerous secondary measures including weight and BMI, and the proportion of patients who lost ≥ 7% or who no longer met criteria for obesity, favored ZIP over ARIP. Decreases in total cholesterol and increases in HDL-cholesterol also favored ZIP. On the other hand, decreases in TG/HDL ratio and reduction in HgbA1c favored ARIP. There were no significant time or group × time interaction effects for most psychopathology measures; however, Global Assessment of Functioning Scores favored ARIP at 6 and 12 months. We conclude that switching patients with evidence of metabolic side effects to either ARIP or ZIP may be beneficial for some, but not all metabolic measures, with minimal risk of worsening of psychopathology and possibly some benefit in that regard as well.

Objective: Longitudinal data comparing the metabolic effects of olanzapine and risperidone with or without valproic acid supplementation in schizophrenic and bipolar patients are lacking., Method: This study compares the metabolic effects of olanzapine and risperidone in a prospective, randomized, open-label trial in 160 patients with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months' treatment. The study was conducted between 2000 and 2006. The primary analysis compared all patients randomized to olanzapine or risperidone; the primary outcome measure was changes in triglycerides (TG), and TG/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, a risk factor for ischemic cardiovascular disease. Secondary analyses included the effect of concomitant valproic acid., Results: Significantly greater increases in weight (F(4,434) = 4.7), body mass index (BMI) (F(4,424) = 5.1), glycosylated hemoglobin (HgbA1c) (F(4,427) = 4.3), total cholesterol (F(4,429) = 4.4), TG (F(4,426) = 5.9), and TG/HDL-C ratio (F(4,426) = 4.3) (P < .005 for all drug × time interaction effects) were observed at all but the initial time points in the olanzapine- compared to the risperidone patients. Olanzapine/+valproic acid produced significantly greater increases in HgbA1c, BMI, weight, TG, and TG/HDL-C than olanzapine/-valproic acid at 3 and 6 months, while risperidone/+valproic acid produced significantly smaller increases in HgbA1c, BMI, and weight at 1, 3, and 6 months than risperidone/-valproic acid. The olanzapine/+valproic acid group had significantly greater BMI, and weight at 1, 3, and 6 months, and greater HgbA1c at 3 and 6 months, compared with the risperidone/+valproic acid group. There were too few patients treated with mood stabilizers other than valproic acid to analyze effects of any other mood stabilizer separately. Metabolic effects did not differ significantly by diagnostic category (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder vs bipolar disorder)., Conclusion: Further study of the metabolic effects of adjunctive valproic acid is indicated, as valproic acid may produce markedly different metabolic effects when combined with various antipsychotic drugs., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00179062., (© Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Baseline body mass index (BMI), baseline BMI status (normal, overweight, obese) and early (1 month) BMI increases were tested as predictors of 6- and 12-month increases in glucose and lipid measures in 82 olanzapine (OLZ)- and 78 risperidone (RIS)-treated patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder who participated in a 12-month randomized, prospective metabolic effects study. Baseline BMI predicted greater fasting glucose and HgbA1c levels at 12 months for both treatments. Early BMI change predicted fasting glucose levels at 6 months, but not HgbA1c or BMI, at either time point. For patients who received no concomitant mood stabilizers, early BMI change predicted 12 month HgbA1c values in the OLZ group, and 6- (but not 12-) month fasting glucose and HgbA1c values in the RIS group. Neither baseline BMI nor early BMI change consistently predicted increases in lipids with either drug. OLZ-treated patients with normal baseline BMI had greater increases in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-HDL-cholesterol than those who were overweight or obese. In conclusion, higher baseline BMI predicted adverse glycemic changes after 12 months with OLZ and RIS. Individuals with normal baseline BMI may be most susceptible to OLZ-induced hyperlipidosis. Frequency of metabolic screening should be independent of baseline BMI or rapid increases in BMI., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy, safety and tolerability of adjunctive armodafinil for cognitive performance, and negative and affective symptoms, were examined in 60 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder., Method: This was a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed dose trial of armodafinil (150 mg/d) augmentation in patients with clinically stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Cognition, psychopathology, alertness/wakefulness and adverse effects were assessed with standardized rating instruments. The primary endpoint was performance on measures of attention/vigilance., Results: Patients were randomly allocated to adjunctive armodafinil or placebo. There was a significant Drug×Time interaction effect for attention/vigilance, due to modest non-significant worsening in the armodafinil group and improvement in the armodafinil group [CPT-Pairs d', F(1,40)=6.2, p=0.017]. However, it became non-significant after correction for multiple comparisons. There were no differences between armodafinil and placebo in other cognitive domains or psychopathology measures. However, armodafinil was associated with significant improvement in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) anhedonia-asociality [F(1,41)=4.1, p=0.05]., Conclusions: There were no significant differences in neurocognitive measures between adjunctive armodafinil and placebo in this 6-week study. Armodafinil improved anhedonia-asociality, but not other negative symptom domains., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: This study evaluated the impact of SULT4A1 gene variation on psychopathology and antipsychotic drug response in Caucasian subjects from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study and a replication sample., Patients & Methods: SULT4A1 haplotypes were determined using SNP data. The relationship to baseline psychopathology was evaluated using linear regression of Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Drug response was evaluated using Mixed Model Repeat Measures (MMRM) for change in PANSS., Results: For the CATIE sample, patients carrying a haplotype designated SULT4A1-1(+) displayed higher baseline PANSS (p = 0.03) and, when treated with olanzapine, demonstrated a significant interaction with time (p = 0.009) in the MMRM. SULT4A1-1(+) patients treated with olanzapine displayed improved response compared with SULT4A1-1(-) patients treated with olanzapine (p = 0.008) or to SULT4A1-1(+) patients treated with risperidone (p = 0.006). In the replication sample, SULT4A1-1(+) patients treated with olanzapine demonstrated greater improvement than SULT4A1-1(-) patients treated with olanzapine (p = 0.05) or than SULT4A1-1(+) patients treated with risperidone (p = 0.05)., Conclusion: If validated, determination of SULT4A1-1 haplotype status might be useful for identifying patients who show an enhanced response to long-term olanzapine treatment. Original submitted 6 October 2010; Revision submitted 9 December 2010.

Clozapine has been shown to be superior to typical neuroleptic drugs for treating positive symptoms in treatment-resistant (TR) schizophrenia. Long-term data from randomized clinical trials comparing clozapine with typical neuroleptics in non-TR schizophrenia are rare. We previously reported that clozapine was superior to typical neuroleptic drugs in some domains of cognition in recent onset non-TR schizophrenia. We now present data on psychopathology and quality of life from this randomized, flexibly dosed, 24-month study of clozapine vs. typical neuroleptics in non-TR schizophrenia patients. Both treatments produced significant improvement in measures of psychopathology, quality of life, and global function, with minor exceptions. There was no difference in extrapyramidal side effects between the patients treated with clozapine or typical neuroleptics. However, significantly more relapse/rehospitalization drop-outs occurred in the typical neuroleptic group. Two patients treated with typical neuroleptics, but none treated with clozapine, became non-responsive to treatment. Clozapine was associated with significantly greater weight gain. Clozapine and typical neuroleptic drugs appear to produce equivalent improvement in psychopathology in patients with non-TR schizophrenia. Clozapine may be more effective than typical neuroleptics for treatment retention and prevention of relapse, but it produces more severe metabolic side effects. These considerations should be taken into account in decisions of how best to utilize clozapine in the treatment of schizophrenia., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Melperone is an atypical antipsychotic drug that has been reported to be effective in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and L-DOPA psychosis. There are limited data concerning its effect on weight or body mass index (BMI). Weight and BMI were retrospectively compared in patients with schizophrenia treated with melperone (n=34), clozapine (n=225), or typical neuroleptics (n=74) for up to 3 months. Clozapine resulted in significant increases in weight and BMI from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months. Neither melperone nor typical neuroleptics resulted in significant weight gain at either time point. Melperone did not result in significant increases in BMI. Weight and BMI were significantly lower with melperone compared with clozapine, but similar to typical neuroleptics. The proportion of melperone patients who experienced a >or=7% weight increase was lower than that in patients treated with clozapine and similar to that in patients treated with typical neuroleptics. Percent change in weight and BMI predicted improvement in BPRS total scores at 3 months in the clozapine group, but not in the melperone or typical neuroleptic groups. Because of the relationship between BMI and cardiovascular risk, melperone deserves further study as both a first line treatment and as an alternative to clozapine in refractory schizophrenia., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of melperone, a butyrophenone with atypical antipsychotic properties, on plasma prolactin (PRL) concentrations compared with clozapine and typical neuroleptics., Methods: Analysis of pre- and post-treatment PRL levels collected prospectively per protocol in a non-randomized study of 26 melperone-, 76 clozapine-, and 66 neuroleptic-treated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Cross-sectional analysis of a larger sample of patients with PRL data was also performed., Results: For males, post-treatment PRL levels were significantly higher in the typical neuroleptic group compared with the melperone (p = 0.0001) and clozapine (p = 0.0001) groups, with no significant difference between clozapine and melperone. For females, post-treatment PRL levels were significantly higher in the melperone group as compared to the clozapine group (p = 0.004). There were too few typical neuroleptic-treated females to permit analysis of this sample. However, the cross-sectional analysis of PRL data confirmed the results for melperone- and clozapine-treated females, and showed higher PRL levels in typical neuroleptic-treated females as compared with those who received melperone and clozapine., Conclusion: Melperone did not significantly increase PRL levels in male patients. However, melperone and typical neuroleptics caused increase in PRL levels in females. Further study of melperone's effects on PRL concentration is warranted.

Background: Clozapine, despite its side-effect burden, has been considered to be the drug of choice for patients with schizophrenia whose psychotic symptoms fail to respond adequately to other anti-psychotic drugs. There are conflicting data concerning the potential utility of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia at doses beyond the 10- to 20-mg/day range that has proven to be effective for most nonrefractory patients with schizophrenia., Objective: The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (target dose, 25-45 mg/day) and clozapine (300-900 mg/day) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had failed to respond adequately to prior treatment with other antipsychotic drugs., Study Design/method: This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine (mean dose, 34 mg/day; N = 19) or clozapine (mean dose, 564 mg/day; N = 21) in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. Outcome measures included psychopathology, cognitive performance (as assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery), and tolerability. The study was conducted between May 2000 and December 2003., Results: Robust and significant (mostly p < .001) improvement in multiple measures of psychopathology, mainly between 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment, was found in both treatment groups, with no significant difference between the 2 treatments except for the Global Assessment of Functioning score, which favored clozapine (p = .01). Improvement in some domains of cognition was significant-and equivalent for both drugs, as well. Nonsignificantly different improvement in Verbal List Learning-Immediate Recall (p < .05), Controlled Word Association Test (p < .05), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (p < .001) was found. There were no significant differences in extrapyramidal symptoms. Weight gain was significantly (p = .01) greater with olanzapine., Conclusions: Olanzapine, at higher than customary doses, demonstrated similar efficacy to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in this study. However, the small sample size precludes definitively concluding that the 2 treatments are equivalent, at these doses, in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The metabolic side effects of olanzapine are a limitation in its use., Clinical Trials Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00179231.

Preliminary evidence suggests that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), the val108/158met SNP, within the gene that codes for catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), a key enzyme involved in regulating dopamine (DA) transmission within the prefrontal cortex (PFC), is related to cognitive function in schizophrenia and cognitive improvement with atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Specifically, several studies have identified an association between working memory and executive functions, and COMT val108/158met genotype in schizophrenia; although there have been several negative findings that are likely related to small sample sizes and, possibly, medication status of patients at the time of testing. The association between COMT val108/158met genotype, cognitive function, and cognitive improvement with clozapine was investigated in a relatively large prospective sample of patients with schizophrenia, most of whom were unmedicated at baseline. Patients were genotyped for the COMT val108/158met SNP after completing a cognitive battery consisting of tests of attention, working memory, verbal learning and memory, executive function, and verbal fluency at baseline and after 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment with clozapine. Consistent with several previous studies, an association between COMT genotype and tests of executive function and working memory was identified at baseline. In addition, a novel interaction between genotype and improvement on tests of attention and verbal fluency was identified. Specifically, met homozygous and val/met heterozygous patients demonstrated significantly greater improvement than val homozygous patients following 6 months of treatment with clozapine. The results are discussed in relation to previous cross-sectional studies and prospective investigations of the associations between COMT genotype, cognition, and cognitive improvement with atypical APDs in schizophrenia.

Organization of semantic memory, one of the domains of cognitive function, is impaired in patients with schizophrenia, and is predictive of functional outcomes. The Category Fluency Task (CFT) has been used to evaluate organization of long-term semantic memory by means of visualizing semantic associations in the form of 'cognitive map' and cluster structures. While atypical antipsychotic drugs (AAPDs) have been shown to ameliorate overall cognitive deficits, little is known about the efficacy of AAPDs for improving higher cognitive functions, such as semantic memory organization. The purpose of the present study was to determine if treatment with olanzapine or ziprasidone has beneficial influence on organization of semantic memory, as revealed by analysis of data from the CFT, in patients with schizophrenia. A retrospective analysis of an open-label trial was conducted for 33 patients with schizophrenia who were treated with either olanzapine or ziprasidone. Nineteen subjects were unmedicated at baseline. The CFT and Letter Fluency Task, as well as the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Quality of Life Scale (QLS), were administered at baseline and 6 wk of the treatment. Semantic structures were obtained by multidimensional scaling analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis of verbal outputs from the CFT. At baseline, no meaningful dimension or cluster was observed in the semantic structure; however, knowledge-based dimensions (wild vs. domestic) appeared after treatment with olanzapine or ziprasidone. Cluster structures also became organized, especially after treatment with olanzapine. Scores of QLS, but not those of BPRS, improved during treatment with the AAPDs. These results suggest a facilitative influence of AAPDs on higher cognitive functions, such as organization of semantic memory, in patients with schizophrenia.

Background: Atypical antipsychotic drugs produce improvement in some domains of cognition as well as psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. However, the effect of combinations of atypical antipsychotic drugs on cognitive function is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of risperidone or placebo on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia who were previously treated with clozapine monotherapy., Method: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-week study included 30 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia. Patients whose psychopathology was no more than partially responsive to clozapine treatment were randomly assigned to receive adjunctive treatment with risperidone (N = 16) up to 6 mg/day or placebo (N = 14). Cognitive test scores for verbal learning and memory, verbal fluency, attention, executive function, verbal working memory, and motor function were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included assessment of psychopathology, extrapyramidal side effects, and global functioning. Data were collected between November 2001 and July 2003., Results: Significant improvement was found in both treatment groups in a variety of cognitive measures, but there was significantly greater improvement in the placebo-augmented group on measures of initial learning acquisition and attention. The improvement in cognition was not correlated with improvement in psychopathology. There were significant correlations between improvement in verbal working memory, verbal learning and memory, and attention and quality of life and global functioning in the placebo-augmented but not the risperidone-augmented group., Conclusion: Adjunctive treatment with risperidone for 6 weeks in patients with schizophrenia who had received chronic treatment with clozapine does not significantly improve cognitive function.

Clozapine and quetiapine have a low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects at clinically effective doses, which appears to be related to their significantly lower occupancy of striatal dopamine D2 receptors (DA D2r) compared to typical antipsychotic drugs (APDs). Animal studies have indicated that clozapine and quetiapine produce selective effects on cortical and limbic regions of the brain and in particular on dopaminergic neurotransmission in these regions. Previous PET and SPECT studies have reported conflicting results regarding whether clozapine produces preferential occupancy of cortical DA D2r. To examine whether clozapine and/or quetiapine produce preferential occupancy of DA D2r in cortex and limbic regions, we studied the occupancy of putamenal, ventral striatal, thalamic, amygdala, substantia nigra, and temporal cortical DA D2r using PET with [18F]fallypride in six schizophrenic subjects receiving clozapine monotherapy and in seven schizophrenic subjects receiving quetiapine monotherapy. Doses were chosen clinically to minimize psychopathology at tolerable levels of side effects such as drowsiness. All had minimal positive symptoms at the time of the study. Regional receptor occupancies were estimated using mean regional DA D2r levels calculated for 10 off-medication schizophrenic subjects. Both clozapine and quetiapine produced lower levels of putamenal DA D2r occupancy than those reported for typical APDs, 47.8 and 33.5%, respectively. Clozapine produced preferential occupancy of temporal cortical vs putamenal DA D2r, 59.8% (p=0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons), and significantly lower levels of occupancy in the substantia nigra, 18.4% (p=0.0015, corrected for multiple comparisons). Quetiapine also produced preferential occupancy of temporal cortical DA D2r, 46.9% (p=0.03, corrected for multiple comparisons), but did not spare occupancy of substantia nigra DA D2r. The therapeutic effects of clozapine and quetiapine appear to be achieved at less than the 65% threshold for occupancy seen with typical APDs, consistent with the involvement of non-DA D2r mechanisms in at least partially mediating the therapeutic effects of these drugs. Preferential occupancy of cortical DA D2r, sparing occupancy of substantia nigra receptors, and non-DA D2r-mediated actions may contribute to the antipsychotic actions of these and other atypical APDs.

There have been conflicting reports as to whether olanzapine produces lower occupancy of striatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor than typical antipsychotic drugs and preferential occupancy of extrastriatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors. We performed [(18)F] fallypride PET studies in six schizophrenic subjects treated with olanzapine and six schizophrenic subjects treated with haloperidol to examine the occupancy of striatal and extrastriatal dopamine receptors by these antipsychotic drugs. [(18)F] setoperone PET studies were performed in seven olanzapine-treated subjects to determine 5-HT(2A) receptor occupancy. Occupancy of dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors by olanzapine was not significantly different from that seen with haloperidol in the putamen, ventral striatum, medial thalamus, amygdala, or temporal cortex, that is, 67.5-78.2% occupancy; olanzapine produced no preferential occupancy of dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors in the ventral striatum, medial thalamus, amygdala, or temporal cortex. There was, however, significantly lower occupancy of substantia nigra/VTA dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors in olanzapine-treated compared to haloperidol-treated subjects, that is, 40.2 vs 59.3% (p=0.0014, corrected for multiple comparisons); in olanzapine-treated subjects, the substantia nigra/VTA was the only region with significantly lower dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy than the putamen, that is, 40.2 vs 69.2% (p<0.001, corrected for multiple comparison). Occupancy of 5-HT(2A) receptors was 85-93% in the olanzapine- treated subjects. The results of this study demonstrated that olanzapine does not produce preferential occupancy of extrastriatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors but does spare substantia nigra/VTA receptors. Sparing of substantia nigra/VTA dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor occupancy may contribute to the low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects in olanzapine-treated patients.

We previously reported that plasma levels of glycine, a co-agonist at N-methyl-D-asparate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptors, are decreased in patients with schizophrenia, and that glycine levels are negatively correlated with negative symptoms. The aim of the present study was to determine if glycine, or its ratio to serine, a precursor of glycine, predicts change in negative symptoms in subjects with schizophrenia during treatment with clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug with multiple effects on glutamatergic activity. Plasma levels of glycine, serine, and their ratio, were measured in 44 patients with schizophrenia who were subsequently treated with clozapine. Baseline glycine levels or glycine/serine ratios predicted the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms - Sum of the Global Scales and Avolition-Apathy after 6 wk of clozapine treatment. These results indicate the association of these amino acid measures with response to clozapine in terms of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Background: Several open trials and case studies have reported beneficial effects following the addition of risperidone for partial responders to clozapine. The purpose of this study was to carry out a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive treatment with risperidone in patients with schizophrenia partially responsive to clozapine., Method: In this 6-week double-blind study, 30 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia who had partial response to clozapine despite being treated for a mean of 32 months were randomly assigned to risperidone (N = 16) up to 6 mg/day or placebo (N = 14). Efficacy assessments included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning scale, and the Quality of Life Scale. A variety of safety and tolerability measures were also obtained. Data were collected between November 2001 and July 2003., Results: Significant improvement was noted in both groups on a variety of measures of psychopathology, but there was significantly greater improvement in the placebo-treated patients on the primary outcome measure, the PANSS positive symptom subscale. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups regarding extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain, vital signs, serum clozapine levels, and QTc interval. The only side effect significantly more severe in risperidone-treated compared to placebo-treated patients was sedation. The patients treated with risperidone developed significant increases in plasma prolactin levels., Conclusion: Adjunctive risperidone treatment in schizophrenia patients partially responsive to clozapine does not significantly improve psychopathology or quality of life compared to placebo in a 6-week period.

Melperone at a dose of 300 mg/day has been reported to be as effective as thiothixene and superior to placebo in the treatment of schizophrenia. Limited ability to cause extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and absence of an effect on plasma prolactin (pPRL) levels suggests that it is an atypical antipsychotic drug. The goal of this pilot study was to determine: (1). the ability of melperone 400 mg/day to produce greater improvement in psychopathology than melperone 100 mg/day; and (2). to compare side effects of these two doses of melperone. Melperone, 100 or 400 mg/day, was administered to 34 acutely hospitalized patients with schizophrenia for 6 weeks in a randomized, double-blind manner. Psychopathology, EPS, pPRL levels, and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated at baseline and 6 weeks. Twenty-seven completed the 6-week treatment. A last carried forward analysis revealed no significant difference in the ability of the two doses of melperone to improve psychopathology as measured by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)-Total and Positive subscale, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Disorganization subscale, and the Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Treatment with melperone was not associated with exacerbation of EPS, or an increase in pPRL levels or BMI. The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) was not significantly changed by treatment with melperone. These results suggest that melperone was equally effective at doses 100 and 400 mg/day, for ameliorating psychopathology and improving overall psychiatric status in patients with schizophrenia. However, the lack of difference and a placebo control group, as well as modest degrees of change in psychopathology, require caution about assuming efficacy of either dose. The lack of significant side effects such as exacerbation of EPS, pPRL elevation, and weight gain indicates melperone is well tolerated.

As a result of superior efficacy and overall tolerability, atypical antipsychotic drugs have become the treatment of choice for schizophrenia and related disorders, despite their side effects. Weight gain is a common and potentially serious complication of some antipsychotic drug therapy, and may be accompanied by hyperlipidemia, hypertension and hyperglycemia and, in some extreme cases, diabetic ketoacidosis. The molecular mechanism(s) responsible for antipsychotic drug-induced weight gain are unknown, but have been hypothesized to be because of interactions of antipsychotic drugs with several neurotransmitter receptors, including 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C) serotonin receptors, H(1)-histamine receptors, alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors, and m3-muscarinic receptors. To determine the receptor(s) likely to be responsible for antipsychotic-drug-induced weight gain, we screened 17 typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs for binding to 12 neurotransmitter receptors. H(1)-histamine receptor affinities for this group of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs were significantly correlated with weight gain (Spearman rho=-0.72; p<0.01), as were affinities for alpha(1A) adrenergic (rho=-0.54; p<0.05), 5-HT(2C) (rho=-0.49; p<0.05) and 5-HT(6) receptors (rho=-0.54; p<0.05), whereas eight other receptors' affinities were not. A principal components analysis showed that affinities at the H(1), alpha(2A), alpha(2B), 5-HT(2A), 5-HT(2C), and 5-HT(6) receptors were most highly correlated with the first principal component, and affinities for the D(2), 5-HT(1A), and 5-HT(7) receptors were most highly correlated with the second principal component. A discriminant functions analysis showed that affinities for the H(1) and alpha(1A) receptors were most highly correlated with the discriminant function axis. The discriminant function analysis, as well as the affinity for the H(1)-histamine receptor alone, correctly classified 15 of the 17 drugs into two groups; those that induce weight gain and those that do not. Because centrally acting H(1)-histamine receptor antagonists are known to induce weight gain with chronic use, and because H(1)-histamine receptor affinities are positively correlated with weight gain among typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs, it is recommended that the next generation of atypical antipsychotic drugs be screened to avoid H(1)-histamine receptors.

Melperone, a butyrophenone, has been shown to possess atypical antipsychotic properties, i.e. ability to produce an antipsychotic effect in man at doses that cause minimal extrapyramidal side effects. In addition, melperone shares the following with other atypical antipsychotic drugs: (1) effectiveness for ameliorating negative symptoms; (2) no prolactin elevation; and (3) effectiveness in the treatment of some patients with neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia. Other atypical antipsychotic drugs have been reported to improve cognitive function. This study was performed to investigate the effect of melperone on cognitive function. Nineteen patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, including 11 neuroleptic-resistant patients, were treated with melperone for 6 weeks. A comprehensive neurocognitive test battery and psychopathological ratings (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, BPRS) were administered at baseline and after 6 weeks of melperone treatment. Treatment with melperone was associated with improvement in executive function, as measured by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST)-Categories and WCST-Percent Perseveration. On the other hand, visuospatial manipulation, as measured by the Wechsler Intelligent Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) Maze, worsened during melperone treatment. There were no significant changes in other domains of cognition, i.e. verbal learning and memory, verbal working memory, verbal fluency and sustained attention. Scores of WCST-Categories and Perseveration at 6 weeks were predicted from the relevant cognitive test scores at baseline and the change in BPRS Total and Positive scores. These results suggest the usefulness of melperone for facilitating work and social function in patients with schizophrenia. The differences in the cognition-enhancing abilities between melperone and clozapine are discussed.

Background: Some, but not all, previous studies have indicated that weight gain is associated with greater improvement in psychopathology during clozapine treatment. Possible reasons for the inconsistent results include failure to adjust for initial body weight and level of psychopathology, differences in trial duration, outcome measures, reliability of assessment, concomitant medications and clozapine dosage. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that clozapine-induced weight gain is related to antipsychotic efficacy at 6 weeks and 6 months after adjusting for initial body weight and severity of illness., Methods: Weight and psychopathology were determined in 74 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at baseline and after 6 weeks and 6 months of open treatment with clozapine monotherapy. The primary measures of psychopathology were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Total and Positive symptoms subscales, Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Schedule for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) and Global Assessment of Function Scale (GAFS)., Results: Significant improvement in the key measures of psychopathology was noted at 6 weeks and 6 months. Mean weight gains at 6 weeks and 6 months were 3.7+/-5.7 S.D. and 7.3+/-7.9 S.D. kg, respectively, with the increase between 6 weeks and 6 months being significant. Age, but not gender, initial body weight, clozapine dosage or plasma levels predicted weight gain at both time points. At 6 weeks and 6 months, after adjustment for age, initial weight and level of psychopathology, the percentage change in weight significantly predicted the improvement in the BPRS Total and Positive symptoms subscale, the SANS Global score, as well as other measures of psychopathology., Conclusions: Increase in weight with clozapine predicted improvement in psychopathology. This suggests that effects of clozapine on neurotransmitters which influence weight gain, e.g. 5-HT(2C) and 5-HT(1a) antagonism, in association with individual variations in these receptors and others molecules, e.g. peptides and transporters, due to polymorphisms or post-translational editing of mRNAs, may also contribute to the improvement in psychopathology.

Melperone is an effective antipsychotic drug that has been reported to have atypical properties, i.e. low extrapyramidal side effect liability at clinically effective doses. It also does not increase serum prolactin levels. Its effectiveness for patients with neuroleptic (treatment)-resistant schizophrenia has not been evaluated. In this study, melperone was administered, in an open trial design of 6 weeks' duration, to 44 patients with chronic neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia. The Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and measures of extrapyramidal symptoms and other clinical variables were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks. Thirty-seven patients completed the 6-week trial. Melperone significantly improved overall psychiatric status as measured by GAS score for all evaluable subjects [last value carried forward (LVCF) and a completers analysis]. No significant effects on BPRS measures of psychopathology scores were found in the LVCF or completers analysis. Patients who showed > or = 20% decrease in the BPRS Total score (N=7) were more likely to have high baseline psychopathology, as measured by BPRS Total and Anxiety-Depression subscales, than those who showed > or = 20% increase in the BPRS Total score (N=8). Non-responders to melperone generally did not respond to subsequent treatment with clozapine, indicating that this group of patients was very treatment resistant. Melperone was not associated with worsening of extrapyramidal symptoms, elevation in plasma prolactin levels, or an increase in body mass index (BMI). The results suggest that a proportion of neuroleptic-resistant patients with schizophrenia respond to melperone, which requires further controlled study.

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of the addition of tandospirone, a serotonin-1A (5-HT(1A)) agonist, to ongoing treatment with typical antipsychotic drugs, on two cognitive domains that are relevant to functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia., Method: Twenty-six patients with schizophrenia who were receiving stable doses of typical antipsychotics were randomly assigned to adjunctive treatment with 30 mg/day of tandospirone or placebo for 6 weeks. Executive function and verbal memory as well as psychopathology were assessed at baseline and after 6 weeks., Results: Both cognitive measures improved significantly in the patients who received tandospirone; subjects who did not receive tandospirone showed no change. There was no significant change in psychopathology ratings in either group., Conclusions: The results suggest the usefulness of 5-HT(1A) agonists for enhancing some types of cognitive performance and possibly social and work function in patients with schizophrenia.

Loxapine is chemically related to clozapine and shares with it and other atypical antipsychotic drugs relatively greater affinity for serotonin (5-HT)2A than for dopamine D2 receptors. However, as is the case for risperidone, the occupancy of 5-HT2A and D2 receptors can range from partial to full, depending upon the dose. It was, therefore, of interest to determine whether loxapine at low doses (< 50 mg/day) might be at least as or more effective and more tolerable than usual clinical doses (> or = 60 mg/day). We retrospectively examined data from 75 patients treated with loxapine and found psychopathology data from 10 and 12 patients treated with low-dose or standard-dose loxapine, respectively. No data were available on the other 53 patients, 28 of whom were initially treated with low-dose and 25 with standard-dose loxapine. For those treated for at least 6 weeks, there was evidence of equivalent efficacy for both low- and standard-dose loxapine with regard to improvement in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Global Assessment Scale scores. There were 6 patients with a history of neuroleptic resistance among the 22 completers. Four of the low-dose group (40%) and 8 of the standard-dose group (67%) had at least a 20% decrease in BPRS total scores. Further study of the dose-response curve for loxapine and its usefulness in treating neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia is indicated.

The relationship between pretreatment levels of plasma homovanillic acid (pHVA) and the outcome of clozapine treatment was studied in 18 male patients with schizophrenia who were resistant to treatment with conventional neuroleptics. After 6 months of clozapine treatment, 7 patients demonstrated > or = 20% decrease in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) (responders), while 11 patients did not (non-responders). Responders and non-responders did not differ with respect to the baseline pHVA level. The BPRS Positive Symptom scores at 6 weeks and 3 months, but not those at baseline and 6 months, following initiation of clozapine treatment negatively correlated with pHVA levels for all patients. The correlations became stronger when only responders were included. No significant correlation between Positive Symptom scores and pHVA levels was observed for non-responders. The BPRS Total and Negative Symptom scores did not correlate with pHVA for all patients, responders or non-responders at any time. The percent decrease in the BPRS Positive Symptom scores from baseline at 6 weeks following clozapine treatment correlated significantly with pHVA levels in responders. These results suggest that pretreatment levels of pHVA can be used to predict relatively short-term changes in the positive symptoms of patients with schizophrenia receiving clozapine treatment, particularly for clozapine responders.

Plasma homovanillic acid (pHVA) levels were compared in a large number of neuroleptic-resistant and -responsive schizophrenic patients (male/female = 161/46) and normal controls (67/27), and correlated with various measures of psychopathology. Psychopathology was evaluated with the brief psychiatric rating scale, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Change version (SADS-C) and SADS-C Global Assessment Scale, the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), and the Quality of Life Scale. No significant differences in pHVA levels between neuroleptic-resistant (n = 104) or -responsive (n = 103) schizophrenic patients, and normal controls, were found; however, there was a main effect for sex, due to higher pHVA levels in women than men. There were no diagnosis x gender or age effects on pHVA levels. No significant correlations were observed between psychopathology ratings and baseline pHVA levels, except with the Hallucinations subscale of SAPS in neuroleptic-responsive patients. Neither duration of neuroleptic washout nor plasma prolactin levels correlated with pHVA levels. Further studies on the origin and significance of the gender difference in pHVA are indicated.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether childhood and adolescent pre-morbid asociality differed in neuroleptic-responsive and neuroleptic-resistant schizophrenia. Pre-morbid asociality was assessed with the Pre-morbid Asociality Adjustment Scale in 411 patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder categorized as being either neuroleptic-responsive or neuroleptic-resistant. Patterns of childhood and adolescent asociality were found to be different in neuroleptic-resistant and neuroleptic-responsive patients. Pre-morbid asociality during the pre-adult years was not consistently worse in patients with poor response to neuroleptic treatment. Greater impairment in late adolescent psychosexual functioning was predictive of poor outcome with regard to neuroleptic treatment.