Search

Background: The likelihood of menses recovery varies greatly in premenopausal patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Quantifying this probability for each patient could better inform the chemotherapy discussion and individualize fertility counseling. We performed a pooled analysis of the PACS04 and PACS05 adjuvant randomized trials to develop a nomogram to estimate the probability of menses recovery at 3, 6, and 18 months after the end of adjuvant chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Women who were premenopausal and aged ≤ 50 years at randomization in the PACS04 and PACS05 trials were included in the present analysis. The primary endpoint was the probability of menses recovery within 18 months of chemotherapy completion. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association of each variable with the likelihood of menses resumption. A nomogram was developed to predict menses recovery at different intervals., Results: The factors associated with menses recovery were assessed for 1210 patients. At a median follow-up of 90 months (range, 3-189 months), 342 of 1210 patients (28.2%) had recovered menses. The probability of menses recovery at 18 months was 25.5% (range, 23.0%-27.9%). After backward elimination, age, final body mass index, type of chemotherapy, and hormone therapy were selected to build the nomogram to predict the probability of menstrual resumption at 3, 6, and 18 months after chemotherapy., Conclusion: An accurate and individualized prediction of menses recovery is feasible for premenopausal patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Our nomogram will be externally validated in a large prospective cohort., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: UNICANCER-PACS08 compared adjuvant FEC (5-FU; epirubicin; cyclophosphamide) then docetaxel to FEC then ixabepilone in poor prognosis early breast cancer (BC). We evaluated whether replacing docetaxel with ixabepilone would increase 5-year disease-free survival (DFS)., Patients and Methods: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or oestrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2- BC patients were randomised to receive standard FEC (3 cycles) followed by 3 cycles of either docetaxel (100 mg/m 2 ) or ixabepilone (40 mg/m 2 ). Radiotherapy was mandatory after conservative surgery; ER+ patients received endocrine therapy., Results: Seven hundred sixty-two patients were enrolled between October 2007 and September 2010. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. Median follow-up was 66.7 months. Median DFS was not reached; 5-year DFS rate was 76% with docetaxel and 79% with ixabepilone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.10; p = 0.175). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 5-year OS rate was 86% versus 84% (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.66-1.42; p = 0.897). TNBC patients treated with ixabepilone had a 23% lower risk of relapse compared to docetaxel (HR for DFS = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.53-1.11; p = 0.168). DFS was longer with ixabepilone than docetaxel in patients with grade II-III lymphocytic infiltration (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.29-1.05; p = 0.063). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse events (AEs): 75% reported grade III-IV AEs and two (<1%) had grade V AEs (both with neutropenia and infection receiving ixabepilone)., Conclusion: After adjuvant FEC, ixabepilone was comparable to docetaxel for treating poor prognosis early BC patients. The benefit of ixabepilone in subgroups (patients with TNBC and grade II-III lymphocytic infiltration) requires further evaluation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: To examine the association between baseline body mass index (BMI), and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in a large French early-stage breast cancer population included in the UNICANCER Programme d'Action Concerté Sein-01 (PACS01) and PACS04 phase III randomised trials., Methods: After a median follow-up of 5.9years, this report analyses 4996 patients with node-positive breast cancer, and randomly assigned to adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy combined or not with taxanes. Univariate analyses were used to study the effects of well known prognostic factors and BMI on DFS and OS. BMI was obtained at baseline, before chemotherapy initiation, and obesity was defined as a BMI⩾30kg/m(2). Cox proportional hazards regression models were secondly used to assess the influence of BMI after adjusting for other factors. Exhaustive analysis of the dose intensity delivered was also studied for comparison between obese and non-obese patients., Results: Obese patients initially present with more advanced disease at diagnosis compared to non-obese patients. By univariate analysis, obesity was moderately associated with poorer DFS (hazard ratio (HR)=1.18 [1.01-1.39] P=0.04), but mostly with poorer OS (HR=1.38 [1.13-1.69] P=0.002). Delivered dose intensity of anthracyclines and taxanes was not significantly different between obese and non-obese patients. After adjustment for disease characteristics, BMI had no influence either on DFS or OS., Conclusion: This report suggests that in a French population, obesity has no impact on breast cancer prognosis when modern adjuvant chemotherapy, at the appropriate dose intensity, is delivered., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of p27 expression in patients with early breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Quantitative immunofluorescence assays for p27 were done on a tissue microarray that included 823 samples from patients randomized between anthracycline-based chemotherapy and no chemotherapy. Quantification of p27 was done using the AQUA® system (HistoRx, Inc., Branford, CT). Both p27 nuclear expression and the nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio were assessed., Results: Nuclear p27 expression was not predictive for the efficacy of anthracycline-based chemotherapy [adjusted P=0.18 for disease-free survival (DFS)] nor prognostic [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.01, P=0.49]. However, p27 nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio was predictive for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (adjusted P=0.016 DFS). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for relapse associated with adjuvant chemotherapy was 0.56 (95% CI 0.37-0.84, P=0.005) and 1.06 (95% CI 0.76-1.47, P=0.74) for patients with high and low nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, respectively. p27 N/C ratio was prognostic in patients treated with chemotherapy (HR for relapse or death for a 1 unit increase in p27 N/C ratio was 0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.77) but not in the untreated arm (HR for relapse or death was 1.27, 95% CI 0.58-2.8)., Conclusions: This study did not confirm the role of p27 nuclear expression as a prognostic parameter. However, the p27 nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio was predictive in patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Purpose: The role of post-therapeutic follow-up for breast cancer patients (pts) is open to debate. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with the type of first event., Methods: Data of 2,820 pts included in three adjuvant trials for node-positive breast cancer were used. Competing risk methodology was used to identify prognostic factors associated with time to first failure according to type of event., Results: After a median follow-up of 53 months, 732 pts had disease-related events (114 locoregional, 58 contralateral, and 560 distant metastasis). The prognostic factors associated with high locoregional recurrence were young age, number of positive lymph nodes and grade III. In multivariate analysis, the type of first event influenced post-relapse survival. Nottingham Prognostic Index identified three groups of pts at different risk of relapse., Conclusion: Early relapse is rare in the first year after surgery and is associated with more aggressive disease. Using the Nottingham Prognostic Index, it is possible to identify pts at lower risks of relapse for whom it seems reasonable to limit the frequency of routine follow-up during the first years. For pts at higher risk of locoregional recurrence, regular follow-up should be maintained in order to detect potential curative events.

Background: Locoregional treatment of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is crucial because local relapses may be highly symptomatic and are commonly associated with distant metastasis. With a median follow-up of 20 years, we report here the long-term results of a monocentric clinical trial combining primary chemotherapy (CT) with a schedule of anthracycline-based CT and an alternating split-course of radiotherapy (RT*CT) without mastectomy., Methods and Materials: From September 1983 to December 1989, 124 women with nonmetastatic IBC (T4d M0) were treated with three cycles of primary AVCMF chemotherapy (anthracycline, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) and then an alternating RT*CT schedule followed by three cycles of FAC. Hormonal therapy was systematically administered: ovarian irradiation (12 Gy in four fractions) or tamoxifen 20 mg daily., Results: Local control was achieved in 82% of patients. The 10- and 20-year local relapse rates were 26% and 33%, respectively, but only 10% of locally controlled cases were not associated with concurrent distant metastasis. The 10- and 20-year overall survival rates were 39% and 19%, respectively. Severe fibrosis occurred in 54% of patients, grade 3 brachial plexus neuropathy in 4%, grade 2 pneumonitis in 9%. Grade 1, 2 and 3 cardiac toxicity was observed in 3.8%, 3.8% and 1.2% of cases respectively., Conclusions: This combined regimen allowed good long-term local control without surgery. Survival rates were similar to those obtained with conventional regimens (primary chemotherapy, total mastectomy, and adjuvant radiotherapy). Since IBC continues to be an entity with a dismal prognosis, this approach, safely combining preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy and systemic treatments, should be reassessed when suitable targeted agents are available., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The initial report from the Programme Action Concertée Sein (PACS) PACS01 trial demonstrated a benefit at 5 years for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates with the sequential administration of docetaxel after FEC100 (fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2)) for patients with node-positive, operable breast cancer. We evaluate here the impact of this regimen at 8 years., Patients and Methods: Between June 1997 and March 2000, a total of 1,999 patients (age <65) with localized, resectable, non-pretreated, unilateral breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either standard FEC100 for 6 cycles or 3 cycles of FEC100 followed by 3 cycles of 100 mg/m(2) docetaxel (FEC-D), both given every 21 days. Radiotherapy was mandatory after conservative surgery and tamoxifen was given for 5 years to hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients. Five-year DFS was the trial's main endpoint. Updated 8-year survival data are presented., Results: With a median follow-up of 92.8 months, 639 patients experienced at least one event. A total number of 383 deaths were registered. Eight-year DFS rates were 65.8% with FEC alone and 70.2% with FEC-D. OS rates at 8 years were 78% with FEC alone and 83.2% with FEC-D. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and number of positive nodes showed a 15% reduction in the relative risk of relapse and a 25% reduction in the relative risk of death in favor of FEC-D. Significant relative risk reductions were observed in the HR-positive, HER2-positive, and Ki67 ≥20% subpopulations., Conclusion: Benefits for DFS and OS rates with the sequential FEC-D regimen are fully confirmed at 8 years.

Background: A dose-dense strategy has been considered to improve results of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. This randomised phase II trial investigated the feasibility of this approach with sequential anthracyclines and taxanes-based chemotherapy., Methods: Patients with high-risk node-positive breast cancer were treated with three cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epirubicin 100 mg m(-2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg m(-2) (FEC 100) followed by three cycles of docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) delivered at 2-weekly intervals supported by primary prophylaxis with filgrastim. All patients were randomised to either uninterrupted treatment (arm A) or to have a 2-week additional period of rest between the FEC and docetaxel (arm B). The primary endpoint was the rate of success of chemotherapy delivery. Using a two-stage Fleming design, 120 patients were required with one interim analysis., Results: In March 2005, enrolment was stopped into arm A after the observation of severe skin toxicities. Following the planned interim analysis, the study was closed because of the high rate of grade 3/4 skin toxicities in both arms (arm A: 32.4% and arm B: 18.9%)., Conclusion: Sequential dose-dense FEC 100 followed by docetaxel 100 mg m(-2) is not feasible. Feasibility still depends largely on several factors including the choice of drugs, dosage and sequence of administration., (2011 Cancer Research UK)

Background: The number of elderly people with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is increasing. A sizeable population of elderly patients with STS is unfit for conventional doxorubicin- or ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of metronomic oral cyclophosphamide (CPM) in this population., Patients and Methods: Patients aged 65 years or older with unresectable STS received CPM 100mg twice daily plus prednisolone 20mg daily, the first week of a 2-week cycle in the outpatient setting. Main evaluation criterion was safety. Secondary evaluation criteria were objective response rate and progression-free survival., Results: Twenty-six patients (median age: 72, range 66-88) received a total of 330 cycles (median per patient: 10, range 2-41) as first (n=19) or second-line chemotherapy (n=7). The most frequent histological subtypes were poorly differentiated sarcoma (n=8), leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma (n = 5 each) and angiosarcoma (n=3). Grade ≥3 lymphopenia was observed in 81% of pts but no opportunist infection occurred. Grade 3 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 pts (8%) each. No other grade 3-4 toxicity was seen. The response rate was 26.9% (95%CI: 9.9-44.0) and the disease control rate (responses and stable disease >12 weeks) was 69.2% (95%CI: 51.5-87.0). One complete (hepatic epithelioid haemangio-endothelioma) and 6 partial responses (including 5pts with radiation-induced sarcomas) were seen. Progression-free survival ranged from 0 to 20.6 months (median: 6.8 months) and was significantly longer in patients with radiation-induced sarcomas (median: 7.8 versus 5.2 months, p=0.02)., Conclusion: Metronomic CPM showed good safety results for this frail population, with promising activity in patients with radiation-induced sarcoma. Toxicity profile was favourable, allowing prolonged home staying and rare treatment discontinuations. A larger prospective study is warranted to confirm these encouraging results in elderly with STS., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Using data from the PACS 01 randomized trial, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of anthracyclines plus docetaxel (Taxotere; FEC-D) versus anthracyclines alone (FEC100) in patients with node-positive breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Costs and outcomes were assessed in 1996 patients and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated, using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as outcome. To deal with uncertainty due to sampling fluctuations, confidence regions around the ICERs were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were drawn up. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out to assess the robustness of conclusions., Results: The mean cost of treatment was 33% higher with strategy FEC-D, but this difference decreased to 18% at a 5-year horizon. The ICER of FEC-D versus FEC100 was estimated to be 9665euro per QALY gained (95% confidence interval euro2372-euro55 515). The estimated probability that FEC-D was cost-effective reached >96% for a threshold of euro50 000 per QALY gained. If the price of taxane decreased slightly, the ICER would reach some very reasonable levels and this strategy would therefore be much more cost-effective., Conclusion: The sequential use of FEC100 followed by docetaxel appears to be a cost-effective alternative, even when uncertainty is taken into account.

To assess anti-tumor activity of sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel with the randomized addition of celecoxib in HER2 negative patients or trastuzumab in HER2 positive patients. From May 2004 till October 2007, 340 patients with stage II and III breast adenocarcinoma, ineligible for breast conserving surgery, received eight sequential three weekly cycles of EC-D [epirubicin (75 mg/m(2))-cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2)) for four cycles followed by docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)) for four cycles]. HER2-negative patients (N = 220) were randomized to receive concomitantly with docetaxel celecoxib 800 mg/day during cycles 5-8 or no additional treatment, while HER2-positive patients confirmed by FISH (N = 120) were randomized to trastuzumab concomitant to docetaxel (8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks) or no additional preoperative treatment. In the HER2 negative group, pCR (grade 1 and 2 of Chevallier's classification) was observed in 11.5 and 13% of patients treated without and with neoadjuvant Celecoxib, respectively. In the HER2 positive group, pCR rate reached 26% in those who received neoadjuvant trastuzumab versus 19% in the others. There was no unexpected toxicity, no cardiac toxicity, and no toxic death. Triple negative breast cancers experience the highest pCR rate of 30%. Celecoxib is not likely to improve pCR rates in addition to EC-D in patients with HER2-negative tumor. In HER2-positive tumor patients, trastuzumab added to ECD leads to increased pCR rates. It was the only combination to deserve further study according to the two-stage Fleming's design used in this trial.

Background: The Hermine study observed the use of trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in routine practice, including patients who received trastuzumab treatment beyond progression (TBP)., Patients and Methods: The study observed 623 patients for > or = 2 years. Treatment was given according to oncologists' normal clinical practices. Endpoints included duration of treatment, efficacy, and cardiac safety. The TBP subanalysis compared overall survival (OS) in 177 patients who received first-line trastuzumab and either continued trastuzumab for > or = 30 days following progression or stopped at or before progression., Results: The median treatment duration was 13.3 months. In the first-, second-, and third-line or beyond treatment groups, the median time to progression (TTP) were 10.3 months, 9.0 months, and 6.3 months, and the median OS times were 30.3 months, 27.1 months, and 23.2 months, respectively. Heart failure was observed in 2.6% of patients, although no cardiac-associated deaths occurred. In the TBP subanalysis, the median OS duration from treatment initiation and time of disease progression were longer in patients who continued receiving trastuzumab TBP (>27.8 months and 21.3 months, respectively) than in those who stopped (16.8 months and 4.6 months, respectively). However, the groups were not completely comparable, because patients who continued trastuzumab TBP had better prognoses at treatment initiation. The median TTP was longer in patients who continued trastuzumab TBP (10.2 months) than in those who stopped (7.1 months)., Conclusion: The Hermine findings confirm that the pivotal trials of first-line trastuzumab treatment in MBC patients are applicable in clinical practice. The subanalysis suggests that trastuzumab TBP offers a survival benefit to MBC patients treated with first-line trastuzumab.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of trastuzumab in patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy if applicable., Patients and Methods: Three thousand ten patients with operable node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without docetaxel. Patients who presented human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -overexpressing tumors were secondary randomly assigned to either a sequential regimen of trastuzumab (6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for 1 year or observation. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS)., Results: Overall 528 patients were randomly assigned between trastuzumab (n = 260) and observation (n = 268) arm. Of the 234 patients (90%) who received at least one administration of trastuzumab, 196 (84%) received at least 6 months of treatment, and 41 (18%) discontinued treatment due to cardiac events (any grade). At the date of analysis (October 2007), 129 DFS events were recorded. Random assignment to the trastuzumab arm was associated with a nonsignificant 14% reduction in the risk of relapse (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.22; P = .41, log-rank stratified on pathologic node involvement). Three-year DFS rates were 78% (95% CI, 72.3 to 82.5) and 81% (95% CI, 75.3 to 85.4) in the observation and trastuzumab arms, respectively., Conclusion: After a 47-month median follow-up, 1 year of trastuzumab given sequentially after adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of relapse.

Background: We hypothesized that, among molecular subclasses of breast cancer, p53 status may have a differential predictive value for the efficacy of anthracyclines/alkylating agents-based regimen. We analysed the efficacy of a preoperative combination between 5-fluorouracil, anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide according to both p53 status and molecular classification., Patients and Methods: Oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression and p53 status were determined by immunohistochemistry in 293 samples from two different centres. A logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis of predictors for pathological complete response (pCR)., Results: p53 immunostaining (54%) was associated with high grade (P = 0.002) and ER negativity (P = 0.04). p53 was detected in 59% of triple-negative tumours (ER-/PgR-/HER2-, n = 120 patients). In the overall population, pCR (9.6%) was independently predicted by high tumour grade (P = 0.002) and ER/PgR/HER2 triple negativity (P = 0.0004), but not by p53 status (P = 0.12). p53 immunostaining was associated with a trend for a higher rate of pCR in triple-negative tumours [relative risk (RR) = 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.8-7.5, P = 0.09], but not in non-triple-negative tumours (RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.16-3.3, P = 0.69)., Conclusion: p53 status may have a different predictive value for efficacy of anthracycline/alkylating agents-based regimen in each molecular subclass, a result which may explain the different results reported in literature.

Purpose: The PACS 01 trial compared six cycles of fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) with a sequential regimen of three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel (FEC-D) as adjuvant treatment for women with node-positive early breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Between June 1997 and March 2000, 1,999 patients with operable node-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned to either FEC every 21 days for six cycles, or three cycles of FEC followed by three cycles of docetaxel, both given every 21 days. Hormone-receptor-positive patients received tamoxifen for 5 years after chemotherapy. The primary end point was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS)., Results: Median follow-up was 60 months. Five-year DFS rates were 73.2% with FEC and 78.4% with FEC-D (unadjusted P = .011; adjusted P = .012). Multivariate analysis adjusted for prognostic factors showed an 18% reduction in the relative risk of relapse with FEC-D. Five-year overall survival rates were 86.7% with FEC and 90.7% with FEC-D, demonstrating a 27% reduction in the relative risk of death (unadjusted P = .014; adjusted P = .017). The incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, the need for hematopoietic growth factor, and incidence of nausea/vomiting were higher with FEC. Docetaxel was associated with more febrile neutropenia in the fourth cycle, stomatitis, edema, and nail disorders. Though rare overall, there were fewer cardiac events after FEC-D (P = .03), attributable mainly to the lower anthracycline cumulative dose., Conclusion: Sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with FEC followed by docetaxel significantly improves disease-free and overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients and has a favorable safety profile.

Purpose: To combine clinical variables associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) after preoperative chemotherapy (PC) into a prediction nomogram., Patients and Methods: Data from 496 patients treated with anthracycline PC at the Institut Gustave Roussy were used to develop and calibrate a nomogram for pCR based on multivariate logistic regression. This nomogram was tested on two independent cohorts of patients treated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The first cohort (n = 337) received anthracycline; the second cohort (n = 237) received a combination of paclitaxel and anthracycline PC. A separate nomogram to predict DMFS was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression model., Results: The pCR nomogram based on clinical stage, estrogen receptor status, histologic grade, and number of preoperative chemotherapy cycles had good discrimination and calibration in the training and the anthracycline-treated validation sets (concordance indices, 0.77, 0.79). In the paclitaxel plus anthracycline group, when the predicted pCR rate was less than 14%, the observed rate was 7.5%; for a predicted rate of > or = 38%, the actual rate was 85%. For a predicted rate between 14% to 38%, the observed rates were 50% with weekly and 27% with 3-weekly paclitaxel. This indicates that patients with intermediate chemotherapy sensitivity benefit the most from the optimized schedule of paclitaxel. Patients unlikely to achieve pCR to anthracylines remain at low probability for pCR, even after inclusion of paclitaxel. The nomogram for DMFS had a concordance index of 0.72 in the validation set and outperformed other prediction tools (P = .02)., Conclusion: Our nomograms predict pCR accurately and can serve as a basis to integrate future molecular markers into a clinical prediction model.

Purpose: We have evaluated whether the mitotic index could predict the benefit of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer who are eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy according to Saint Gallen guidelines., Patients and Methods: A total of 937 patients from a single institution were included in two randomized trials that compared adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy with no chemotherapy. These patients account for 83% of the overall population included in these trials. The first trial included premenopausal patients with node-negative disease, and the second one included postmenopausal patients, regardless of lymph node status. The treatment benefit was assessed according to the number of mitoses per field (x400)., Results: The mitotic index was assessable in 888 patients (94%). All the patients presented as either node-positive or an average-risk breast cancer according to 2003 Saint Gallen consensus conference guidelines. The 5-year overall survival rates were 91% and 87% for patients treated or not with adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .09). In patients with low/medium mitotic index (< three mitoses/field; n = 450), the 5-year overall survival rate was 95% for patients treated or not with adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .56). In patients with high mitotic index (>/= three mitoses/field; n = 438), the 5-year overall survival rates were 86% and 79% for patients treated or not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively (P = .02)., Conclusion: A high mitotic index is associated with the efficacy of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy in daily practice.

Two randomized trials evaluated the effect of 6 courses of anthracycline-based chemotherapy in early breast cancer. A total of 1146 patients were included: 311 high-risk node-negative premenopausal patients and 835 high-risk node-negative or node-positive postmenopausal patients. Patients were randomized after surgery to receive either no chemotherapy (control group) or 6 courses of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (CT group). Postmenopausal patients received adjuvant tamoxifen for at least two years. Radiotherapy was delivered after completion of chemotherapy in the CT group. The 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 60% in the control group and 65% in the CT group (log-rank test, p = 0.01). The 10-year distant metastasis rates were 28% and 23% (p = 0.02), and the 10-year local recurrence rates were 12% and 10%, respectively (p = 0.24). Chemotherapy was significantly less effective in post-menopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy yielded a significant benefit for DFS by lowering the risk of distant metastases. After up to 10 years of follow-up, deferring radiotherapy after chemotherapy did not compromise local control.

Background: We studied the effect of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with resected early breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen., Patients and Methods: The trial included 835 patients with either axillary lymph node involvement, or tumors with histological grade II or III. They were randomized after local surgery to receive either tamoxifen (TAM group) or tamoxifen plus chemotherapy (TAM-CT group) consisting of six courses of 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FAC), or 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC). Radiotherapy was given after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in the TAM-CT group and after surgery in the TAM group., Results: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 73% in the TAM group and 79% in the TAM-CT group (log-rank test, P = 0.06). The 5-year overall survival rates were 82% and 87%, respectively (P = 0.06). The 5-year distant metastasis rates were 22% and 16% (P = 0.02), and the 5-year local recurrence rates were 6% and 4%, respectively (P = 0.23). There were no significant differences for contralateral breast cancer or other new primary malignancies. Chemotherapy tended to be more effective for patients who had tumors without estrogen receptors (trend test, P = 0.05)., Conclusions: Anthracycline-based chemotherapy administered to postmenopausal patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen gave a borderline significant benefit on overall and DFS, mainly by a reduction in distant metastases. Delaying radiotherapy after six courses of chemotherapy did not affect local control after up to 10 years of follow-up.

Purpose: Phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of combined oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (5-FU) in taxane-pretreated advanced and metastatic breast cancer (ABC) patients., Patients and Methods: Sixty-four taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated (within 6 months of study entry) women were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous [IV] infusion), day 1, and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2)/d (continuous IV infusion) days 1 to 4, every 3 weeks., Results: Median patient age was 51 years (range, 34 to 71 years), with a median of two involved organs (range, one to six organs), and metastases in the liver (70%), bone (47%), and lung (34%). Patients had a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens (range, one to six regimens), and 78% had previous hormonal therapy, with clinical taxane and anthracycline resistance in 53% and 34%, respectively. A total of 367 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles/patient (range, one to 15 cycles). Sixty patients were assessable for response (World Health Organization criteria): 17 partial response, 26 stable disease, and 17 disease progression, giving an overall response rate of 27% (95% confidence interval, 16.3% to 39.1%), and 26% and 36% in taxane- and anthracycline-resistant populations, respectively, all responders having metastatic liver disease. Median time to progression was 4.8 months, and median overall survival was 11.9 months. Four treatment-related serious adverse events occurred, seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. Hematotoxicity was prevalent but rarely severe, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in 34%, 19%, and 16% of patients, respectively, and a single episode of febrile neutropenia. One third of patients developed grade 2-3 peripheral neuropathy (oxaliplatin-specific scale), with grade 3 in only 8%., Conclusion: This oxaliplatin/5-FU combination is effective with an excellent safety profile in anthracycline/taxane-pretreated ABC patients, showing encouraging activity in patients with anthracycline/taxane-resistance or visceral disease.

The aim of this study, using a Fleming single-stage design, was to explore the efficacy and safety of Taxotere 100 x mg x m(-2) docetaxel and FEC 75 cyclophosphamide 500 mg x m(-2), fluorouracil 500 x mg x m(-2) and epirubicin 75 mg x m(-2), in alternating and sequential schedules for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. One hundred and thirty-six women were randomly allocated, to one of three treatment regimens: DTX 100 plus FEC 75, alternated for eight courses (ALT); four courses of DTX 100 followed by four courses of FEC 75 (SEQ T); or four courses of FEC 75 followed by four courses of DTX 100 (SEQ F). One hundred and thirty-one women were evaluable for tumour response. Although the treatment outcome was equivalent in the two sequential arms and the alternating regimen (P=0.110, not significant), the response rate was less encouraging in the SEQ F arm (52.3%) than in the other two arms (71.1% for ALT and 70.5% for SEQ T), in which docetaxel was administered first. Time to progression was similar in the ALT, SEQ T and SEQ F arms (9.5, 9.3 and 10.4 months respectively). Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in nearly all patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 9% (ALT), 16% (SEQ T) and 2% (SEQ F) of patients. Few patients (< or =9%) developed grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities. Relative dose intensity was 97-99% for all regimens. All treatment regimens were active and well tolerated., (Copyright 2002 Cancer Research UK)

Purpose: Based on encouraging results reported in alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy in inflammatory breast carcinoma, we have tried in this study to optimize locoregional treatment with a hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy schedule alternating with chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: From May 1991 to May 1995, 54 patients, previously untreated, with non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer were entered in an alternating protocol consisting of eight courses of combined chemotherapy and two series of loco-regional hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with a total dose of 66 Gy. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy was started after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Adriamycin, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, 5-fluoro-uracile) administered every 21 days +/- G.CSF. The first series delivered 45 Gy/three weeks to the breast, the axillary, subclavicular and internal mammary nodes, with two daily sessions of 1.5 Gy separated by an interval of eight hours; the second series consisted of a boost (21 Gy/14 fractions/10 d) alternating with another regimen of anthracycline-based-chemotherapy (a total of five cycles every three weeks). Hormonal treatment was given to all patients., Results: Of the 53 patients evaluated at the end of the treatment, 44 (83%) had a complete clinical response, seven (13%) had a partial response (> 50%) and two (4%) had tumoral progression. Of the 51 patients who were locally controlled, 18 (35%) presented a locoregional recurrence (LRR); eight (15%) had to undergo a mastectomy. All the patients but two with LRR developed metastases or died of local progressive disease and 26 (50%) developed metastases. With a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 4-74 months), survival rates at three and five years were respectively, 66 and 45% for overall survival and 45 and 36% for disease-free survival., Conclusion: Alternating a combination of chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy is a well-tolerated regimen which provides acceptable local control. The systemic dissemination remains the major problem of inflammatory breast carcinoma and further clinical trials using alternative drug regimens are warranted.

Purpose: The safety and efficacy of a docetaxel-cisplatin combination (DC) were evaluated in 41 patients pretreated for advanced breast cancer (ABC)., Patients and Methods: The first 2 patients received 85 mg/m2 docetaxel followed, 6 hours later, by 80 mg/m2 cisplatin repeated every 3 weeks; the other 39 received the same regimen, with 75 mg/m2 docetaxel. Appropriate dose reductions but no growth factor administration were planned. Treatment was continued until disease progression, excessive toxicity or patient refusal., Results: A total of 223 chemotherapy courses were administered, with a median of 6 cycles per patient (range 1-8). All 41 patients were assessed for toxicity using NCI-CTC. Severe neutropenia was experienced by 38 patients (93%) (11 at grade 3, 27 at grade 4, 10 with febrile neutropenia). There was one death due to neutropenic septic shock. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in three patients (7%). Five patients (12%) had grade 2 neurosensory toxicity, two (5%) experiencing partial hearing loss. Grade 3 fluid retention occurred in three patients (7%). Of 38 anthracycline-resistant patients, 33 were evaluable for response. Two had a complete response (CR) and ten a partial response (PR), giving an objective response rate of 36%, (95% CI: 20%-55%). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 14 patients (42%), 7 (21%) had progressive disease (PD). Among the three non-resistant patients, two PRs and one SD were observed. Median duration of response was 29 weeks (range 18-70), median time to progression 21 weeks (4-70), and median overall survival 50 weeks (4-104+)., Conclusions: This DC regimen is active, with an acceptable safety profile in anthracycline-resistant ABC patients. Its place as a second-line treatment alternative to docetaxel alone or to other second-line combination regimens remains to be determined.

Purpose: Previous studies demonstrated that doxorubicin and vinorelbine combinations in first-line chemotherapy are highly active in metastatic breast cancer. Mitoxantrone is an anthracenedione with low cardiotoxicity, and seems to be effective when combined with vinorelbine after prior exposure to anthracyclines., Patients and Methods: Seventy-two patients with metastatic breast cancer were included in a phase II study. All patients had previously received one anthracycline-containing regimen (doxorubicin or epirubicin) in an adjuvant setting. Vinorelbine was administered at 25 mg/m2 in a 20-min intravenous (i. v.) infusion, days 1 and 8. Mitoxantrone was given at 10 mg/m2 (66 patients) or 12 mg/m2 (6 patients) in a slow i.v. infusion on day 1. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks., Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluable for response; the objective response rate was 49% (95% CI: 37-63%), including four complete and 28 partial responses, with a median duration of response of 7 months (range 2.3-27). Median overall survival was 19 months (range 2-48). Grade 3-4 granulocytopenia was observed in 46% of patients. There were 12 admissions (3% of cycles), involving 17% of patients for febrile neutropenia. Seven patients (10%) experienced grade 3 or 4 cardiotoxicity, and 1 patient died of cardiac heart failure. Other side effects were rare and mild., Conclusions: The vinorelbine and mitoxantrone combination is an active regimen with low toxic complications when cumulative doses of mitoxantrone are limited to 70 mg/m2. The results in this phase II study make it worthwhile including this regimen in a phase III study for patients who have previously received an anthracycline-containing regimen.

In an attempt to develop new, active, and convenient outpatient combination-chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic breast cancer, we performed two phase I studies combining paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus anthracycline for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, without the use of hematopoietic growth factors. Study I was designed to test the tolerability and antitumor activity of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in combination with an epirubicin intravenous bolus. Study 2 explored a three-drug chemotherapy regimen: a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. If any dose-limiting events occurred in two or more of six patients in the first course of a given dose level, that dose level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting criteria included the following: neutrophils less than 0.25 x 10(9)/L lasting for > or = 5 days, any febrile neutropenia, World Health Organization grade 4 thrombocytopenia, World Health Organization grade > or = 3 nonhematologic toxicity or grade > or = 3 mucositis for more than 5 days, and absence of hematologic recovery at day 35. In both studies, paclitaxel doses were escalated in subsequent groups of three to six patients. For study I, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (110 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2). To date 40 patients have entered the study at eight dose levels. Of the 181 cycles evaluated, grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 63% of courses, with only five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity was observed in 43% of patients. Two patients experienced clinical heart failure. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached so far. At dose level 7 (paclitaxel [250 mg/m2]/epirubicin [50 mg/m2]), only one patient of six experienced febrile neutropenia. We are currently testing paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/epirubicin (75 mg/m2). Preliminary evaluation of response documents two complete and 16 partial responses in 37 evaluable patients (48% overall response rate). In study 2, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (150 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2)/cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2). To date, three dose levels have been investigated in 16 evaluable patients (82 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 80% of courses, and five episodes were associated with neutropenic fever. Grade 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% of patients. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached, and we are currently investigating dose level 4 (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2). These trials confirm the tolerability of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. The antitumor activity is encouraging.

Attempting to develop a new active, convenient regimen, we initiated a phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) combined with epirubicin (Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to standard eligibility criteria, patients with chemotherapy-naive metastasis and at least one measurable lesion had to have left ventricular ejection fractions of at least 50%; the metastatic relapse had to have occurred more than 6 months after adjuvant treatment. Anthracycline-pretreated patients could not have received cumulative doses of more than 300 mg/m2 doxorubicin, 450 mg/m2 epirubicin, or 70 mg/m2 mitoxantrone. An intravenous bolus dose of epirubicin was followed by a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion, with courses repeated every 3 weeks. To date, seven dose levels have been investigated and 31 patients have been treated, 19 of whom had already received anthracyclines. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% and 19% of 123 courses, respectively, with five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity has been observed in 42% of patients and cardiac toxicity in four patients (13%), all of whom had already received anthracyclines. One patient experienced transient myocardial ischemia, one had an asymptomatic decrease in ejection fraction, and two patients had clinical heart failure that required treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at dose level 5 (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 60 mg/m2), with two of three patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Reducing the epirubicin dose to 50 mg/m2, however, allowed the paclitaxel dose to be escalated to 250 mg/m2. At this dose level, only one of six patients experienced febrile neutropenia. At a preliminary response evaluation (dose levels 1 to 6), 11 patients (44%) had partial responses, 12 patients (48%) had stable disease, and disease progressed in two patients. We conclude that the combination paclitaxel/epirubicin is safe for patients with metastatic breast cancer and, at this early evaluation, shows promising antitumor activity. Additional patients will be treated at dose level 5 to confirm whether dose-limiting toxicity occurs at this step. Indeed, we took into consideration that dose-limiting toxicity observed at this particular dose level in two of three patients might be due to hazard, since paclitaxel dose escalation up to 250 mg/m2 was further possible in association with 50 mg/m2 epirubicin.

Purpose: The study investigated the therapeutic effects of a combination of Navelbine (vinorelbine or 5'noranhydrovinblastine; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Boulogne, France) and doxorubicin in women who had received no prior chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer., Patients and Methods: Ninety-seven patients with progressive and assessable advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy except in an adjuvant setting were entered onto the study. Eighty-nine patients were assessable for toxicity and response by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria; the other eight patients were excluded because they did not meet entry criteria or because of protocol violations. Navelbine was administered at 25 mg/m2 by 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1 and 8, and doxorubicin at 50 mg/m2 by slow IV infusion on day 1, with each course repeated at 3-week intervals. Patients were treated for a maximum of 11 cycles or until progression or major toxicity., Results: Objective responses were observed in 66 of 89 assessable patients (74%; 95% confidence interval, 63% to 85%). There were nineteen (21%) complete responses (CRs) and 47 (53%) partial responses (PRs). In addition, 20 patients (22.5%) had stable disease and three (3.5%) progressed while on treatment. Responses were observed at all sites of metastatic disease. Forty-one of 58 patients with visceral disease responded (71%) and 25 of 31 with soft tissue and bone disease experienced an objective response (81%). The median duration of response was 12 months (range, 2.4 to 40.5), and the median overall survival was 27.5 months (range, 4 to 46). Neutropenia was dose-limiting, with 36 patients (41%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Of 727 cycles administered, there were 20 admissions (3%) for treatment of febrile neutropenia, involving 14 of 89 patients (16%). Treatment-related cardiotoxicity at grade 2 to 4 was experienced by 10% of patients and necessitated the interruption of treatment in 1.5% of cycles. Other side effects were uncommon or manageable by conventional means., Conclusion: The encouraging response rates and duration achieved with this combination of Navelbine/doxorubicin under the conditions of this study deserve further randomized comparative trials with standard regimens.

Dolasetron mesylate (MDL 73,147EF), a new serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist was administered to 164 cancer patients naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, in single, rising doses of 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg i.v. 15 minutes prior to an infusion of cisplatin. The severity of nausea and number of episodes of emesis were recorded during the 24-hour period following cisplatin administration. There were significant differences between the dose groups, sex, and naive and non-naive patients. There were also significant dolasetron dose-dependent differences for no emesis (p = .01), less than 3 emetic episodes (p = .01), time-to-onset of nausea (p = .04), and time-to-onset of emesis (p = .003). The severity of symptoms was greater for females, for patients with previous chemotherapy, and with shorter duration of cisplatin infusion. Adjustment for these variables and the study center reduced the associations between the dose of dolasetron mesylate and the outcome variables. The principal adverse events were headache (11%) and diarrhea (6%). Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated; a single dose of 40 or 50 mg controlled acute nausea and vomiting induced by highly emetogenic chemotherapy in the majority, in particular in chemotherapy-naive and male patients. In conclusion, 50 mg and a larger dose merit study in controlled trials with stratification for sex and previous chemotherapy.

Thirty nine patients with metastatic breast cancer, all previously treated with chemotherapy including anthracycline, were given Elliptinium acetate (80 mg/m2/day) and a continuous infusion of Vinblastine (2 mg/m2/day) for 3 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Twenty nine patients had measurable metastatic disease. Nine (31%) achieved a partial response. No complete response was observed. Median duration of response was 6 months. The response rate was dependent on the number of metastatic sites and independent of the number of previous chemotherapy regimes. Side effects were dry mouth (27 patients), vomiting (9), neutropenia (3 patients with grade IV, 2 with grade III), muscle cramps (5) and thrombosis (3). Xerostomia and vomiting contributed to weight loss and fatigue (8 patients). We conclude that Elliptinium-Vinblastine combination has moderate activity as second line treatment in metastatic breast cancer. This combination causes xerostomia and fatigue with moderate myelosuppression.

A consecutive series of 22 patients with multiple synchronous squamous cell carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract was retrospectively reviewed. These patients were treated initially with cis-platinum combination chemotherapy before definitive locoregional therapy (surgery and/or radiation therapy). Sixteen of 21 patients had simultaneous head and neck and esophageal primaries, 3 patients had multiple synchronous head and neck primaries, 2 patients had head and neck (HN) and a bronchial epidermoid cancer, and 1 patient had simultaneous esophageal and bronchial carcinomas of epidermoid lineage. Sixteen (77%) of the 21 patients responded to chemotherapy in all the tumor sites evaluated, and a clinically complete response was obtained in 6 (29%). After definitive locoregional treatment, the complete local control rate was 68%, with 34 complete responses for 50 primary tumor sites in 21 patients. Twelve patients were free of disease after locoregional treatment. Six patients are still alive 27 to 57 months after complementary definitive locoregional treatment and a minimum follow-up of 27 months. Median survival for the overall group is 17 months. The response to chemotherapy is remarkable, which may be due to the small tumoral volume present in many of the cases (T1 to T2). Nevertheless, the present report stresses the importance of an aggressive combined therapeutic approach in this difficult clinical situation.

The results of several studies of chemotherapy in treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of adults (except embryonic rhabdomyosarcoma) are presented. Most of these studies have been performed and published by the EORTC Bone and Soft tissue sarcoma group. In advanced disease, a randomized trial including 551 evaluable patients and comparing doxorubicin alone (75 mg/m2 q. 3 weeks), and two combination regimens: DI (Doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) + Ifosfamide (5 g/m2 + mesnum q. 3 weeks), and Cyvadic (Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 d1, DTIC 750 mg/m2 d1, VCR 1.5 mg/m2 d1 (maximum 2 mg/m2), Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 d1 q. 3 weeks), failed to prove any significant difference between these 3 treatments for response rate (25%, 31%, 28%), quality of the response and survival. There is a dose/effect relationship doxorubicin, it is possible that if combination is not superior to a single agent, the reason could be that the dose of doxorubicin is too low when used in combination as compared with the dose when used alone. So, in a phase II trial including 48 evaluable patients, optimal dose of doxorubicin (75 mg/m2 and Ifosfamide (5 g/m2) was given in association with rhGM-CSF. The response rate observed with this combination was 50%. For localized disease, in a randomized trial of the EORTC including 374 evaluable patients with resectable tumors with a mean follow-up of 44 months, the interest of 8 Cyvadic as adjuvant chemotherapy after adequate locoregional treatment (surgery with or without radiotherapy) was demonstrated only for locoregional relapse free survival but no for metastatic disease free survival or overall survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

70 patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder received methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (M-VAC). Complete responses (CR) were obtained in 13 of the 67 (19%) evaluable patients and partial responses (PR) in 25 patients for an objective response rate of 57% (95% CI 45-69%). Of the 54 patients who have had a minimum follow-up of 2 years, 8 patients (15%) are disease-free or have stable residual disease. Median survival of the 70 patients was 13 months. Toxicity was acceptable with no drug-related deaths. Because of myelosuppression, only 15 patients (21%) received treatment without delays in drug administration or modifications from the planned schedule. Our results confirm that this regimen is effective, with some patients being long-term survivors.

Prognostic factors were identified in a group of 210 patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) treated at Institut Gustave Roussy from 1976-1985 with three successive induction protocols: Group A (n = 91), 1976-1980, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate (AVM); Group B (n = 79), 1980-1982, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (AVCMF); Group C (n = 40), 1983-1985, AVCMF. Groups A and B received 3 courses of respective chemotherapy (Ct) followed by radiotherapy (Rt), 45 Gy to breast and nodes and 65-70 Gy to the tumor. Group C after the third Ct course received split courses of Rt to equivalent doses so there was no time lag between Ct courses. Ct from fourth to ninth courses was AVM in all groups. Hormonal therapy, radiocastration (pre and perimenopausal) or tamoxifen (postmenopausal) was given all patients. Clinical characteristics of age, menopausal status, castration, N status, and degree of clinical inflammation (limited to tumor area [PEV 2] or involving the entire breast [PEV 3]) were similar in all groups. Groups B and C had identical disease-free and overall survivals, superior to Group A (p = 0.005). In multi-variate analysis, AVCMF was one of the important prognostic factors together with PEV and N status.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Seventy-five breast cancer patients scheduled to receive a first course (in a new cycle) of cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (FAC) or epirubicin (FEC) participated in a double-blind crossover study to compare the antiemetic efficacy and safety of ondansetron (GR38032), a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, and metoclopramide. Ondansetron was given as an 8 mg loading dose (4 mg intravenously [IV] plus 4 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 8 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. Metoclopramide was given as an 80 mg loading dose (60 mg IV plus 20 mg orally) before chemotherapy followed by 20 mg every 8 hours orally for 3 to 5 days. A "period" interaction in the analysis of emetic response in the first 24 hours necessitated a parallel group analysis of first treatments only, 68 patients being assessable for this parameter. In the first 24 hours, complete or major control (zero to two emetic episodes) of emesis was achieved in 30 of 35 (86%) patients receiving ondansetron and in 14 of 33 (42%) patients receiving metoclopramide (P less than .001). Ondansetron was also more effective in reducing acute nausea. On days 2 to 3, the complete or major responses were significantly better with ondansetron (81% v 65%; P = .033), but there was no statistical difference in the control of nausea. There was a significant patient preference for ondansetron (63% v 26%; P = .001). Extrapyramidal reactions were observed in two metoclopramide treatments; both treatments were otherwise well tolerated. These results are consistent with serotonin (5-HT), being a significant neurotransmitter of cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin- or epirubicin/fluorouracil-induced emesis.

Twenty-one patients with refractory germ cell tumors were treated with a chemotherapy regimen containing etoposide (VP-16) (V) 75 mg/m2/day (days 1 to 5), ifosfamide (I) 3 g/m2/day (days 1 and 2) with a 3.6 g/m2 continuous infusion of mesna (days 1 and 2), and high-dose cisplatin (hP) 40 mg/m2/day (days 1 to 5). The regimen is referred to as VIhP. Nineteen patients were evaluable for response. Five patients (26%) achieved a complete remission (CR) with chemotherapy alone, and three patients (16%) were in CR after resection of a residual nonactive tumoral mass (e.g., necrosis and/or fibrosis and/or mature teratoma). Thus, a CR rate of 42% was achieved with the entire treatment. One additional patient achieved a CR after resection of active, bulky disease. Among the responders, five patients (26%) are still alive and disease-free at 6, 7, 9, 10, and 18 months after the initiation of the chemotherapy. However, toxicity was heavy in this protocol. Severe myelosuppression was observed with 10 patients developing aplasia and six patients documented sepsis. Reversible Grade 1-2 renal toxicity occurred in 14 patients, and Grade 2-3 peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in six patients. No hemorrhagic cystitis was encountered. We conclude that a VIhP regimen seems to play an active role in refractory germ cell tumors although the presence of high-dose cisplatin in this regimen does not appear to improve the response rate compared to that of a conventional dose. Toxicity, which seems to be enhanced, is currently under detailed study. However, the contribution of VIhP as a first-line treatment in poor prognosis, advanced germ cell tumors warrants further study.

We report the largest series of induction chemotherapy for inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC). Results of two chemotherapy protocols with radiation therapy (RT) (170 patients) are compared with results with radiation alone (60 patients) in the treatment of this disease. From 1973 to 1975, 60 patients (control, group C) received RT (45 Gy and 20 to 30 Gy boost) and hormonal manipulation. From 1976 to 1980, 91 patients (group A) were treated with induction chemotherapy: Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), vincristine, and methotrexate (AVM) and RT on a cyclical schedule; and maintenance chemotherapy: vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (VCF). From 1980 to 1982, 79 patients (group B) received induction chemotherapy, Adriamycin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-FU (AVCMF) and RT on a cyclical schedule and VCF maintenance. Hormonal manipulation was performed in all groups. Disease-free survival at 4 years was 15% for group C, 32% for group A, and 54% for group B (P less than .005 group C v group A, less than .00001 group C v group B, and less than .01 group A v group B). Total survival at 4 years was 42% for group C, 53% for group A, and 74% for group B (P = .17 group C v group A, less than .00001 group C v group B, and less than .001 group A v group B). Clinical assessment of tumor aggressiveness, nodal status, type of chemotherapy administered, and early response to chemotherapy (by third course) were all prognostic factors. There is an important, highly statistically significant benefit in terms of both disease-free survival and total survival observed in patients treated with the addition of chemotherapy compared with radiation alone in IBC.

Fifty operable epidermoid esophageal carcinomas were treated by combined chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy. The post-operative mortality was 5.4% and the severe post-operative morbidity was 29%. The vindesine-5FU-platinum association and the vindesine-endoxan-platinum association gave respectively 55% and 35% objective responses (OR) after two preoperative courses without increasing the operative mortality. The patients who showed an OR had a less important tumoral extension. Thus, an objective response to the pre-operative chemotherapy is in fact a new prognostic factor. Survival without recurrence seems to be increased when chemotherapy is efficient in the curative resection group. These findings incite to promote prospective randomized studies with this kind of combined therapy.

The results of 2 chemotherapeutic regimens used in 170 cases of inflammatory breast cancer were compared with those obtained in 60 historical controls treated with radiotherapy and hormonal therapy. Inflammatory breast cancers could be divided into evolutive phase 2 with limited signs of inflammation and evolutive phase 3 where inflammation involved the whole breast. The 60 controls had been treated between 1967 and 1974 with radiotherapy (45 Gy plus an extra dose of 20 or 30 Gy); premenopausal patients underwent ovarian irradiation. The 91 patients treated with regimen A between 1976 and 1980 received a DVM-type induction chemotherapy (doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristin 1 mg/m2 on day 2, and methotrexate 6 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5) every 3 or 4 weeks, and a VCF-type maintenance chemotherapy (vincristin 1 mg/m2 on day 1, cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 on days 2, 3, 4 and 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 on days 2, 3, 4) every 4 weeks. Premenopausal patients had their ovaries irradiated; postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen. The therapeutic sequence was: 3 DVM - 45 Gy - DVM - 15 Gy - 4 DVM - 4-12 VCF. The 79 patients treated between 1980 and 1982 with regimen B received a DVCMF-type induction therapy (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1, vincristin 0.6 mg/m2 on day 2, 5-fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5, cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5 and methotrexate 10 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 5) every 4 weeks. Hormonal therapy was the same as with regimen A. The sequence was 3 DVCMF - 45 Gy - DVM - 20-25 Gy - 4 DVM - 4-12 VCF. The survival rate at 3 years was 42% in controls, 53% in regimen A patients and 74% in regimen B patients (P less than 0.05). The relapse-free survival rates in these three groups at 3 years were 15%, 32% and 54% respectively (P less than 0.0008). These results suggest that a multidisciplinary approach and initial chemotherapy are useful in this type of breast cancer. The value of prolonged maintenance treatment is discussed.

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors. There is a lot of histologic varieties but the natural history and the prognosis are very similar. Surgery remains the first step of the treatment policy. Radiotherapy, given additionally, can prevent local relapse. Till now, chemotherapy was given to patientes with advanced diseases. Except doxorubicine and ifosfamide much drugs act poorly in the solft tissue sarcomas. CYVADIC is the best combination available. One randomized study has established the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The real place of chemotherapy, probably will be in the next years, beside surgery and radiotherapy, in a multidisciplinary combined approach.

We have treated 64 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using a combination of Vindesine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1-2, Cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 on day 2-3-4, Cis-Platin 100 mg/m2 on day 3 and CCNU. 28 of the 37 patients considered to be inoperable were evaluable. We observed three complete responses and three partial responses in this group (overall response rate 21,5%). Twenty seven patients considered to be operable received the same chemotherapy without CCNU, owing to the risk of thrombopenia. 23 of these patients were evaluable in whom we observed 35% partial responses and no complete responses. No severe toxicity related to the chemotherapy protocol was observed. The mediocre results among the group of inoperable patients suggest that other chemotherapy protocols need to be tested. On the other hand, in the group of operable patients, the preliminary results encourage us to continue this study.