Back to Search Start Over

UCBG 2-08: 5-year efficacy results from the UNICANCER-PACS08 randomised phase III trial of adjuvant treatment with FEC100 and then either docetaxel or ixabepilone in patients with early-stage, poor prognosis breast cancer.

Authors :
Campone M
Lacroix-Triki M
Roca L
Spielmann M
Wildiers H
Cottu P
Kerbrat P
Levy C
Desmoulins I
Bachelot T
Winston T
Eymard JC
Uwer L
Duhoux FP
Verhoeven D
Jaubert D
Coeffic D
Orfeuvre H
Canon JL
Asselain B
Martin AL
Lemonnier J
Roché H
Source :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2018 Nov; Vol. 103, pp. 184-194. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 26.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Purpose: UNICANCER-PACS08 compared adjuvant FEC (5-FU; epirubicin; cyclophosphamide) then docetaxel to FEC then ixabepilone in poor prognosis early breast cancer (BC). We evaluated whether replacing docetaxel with ixabepilone would increase 5-year disease-free survival (DFS).<br />Patients and Methods: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or oestrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2- BC patients were randomised to receive standard FEC (3 cycles) followed by 3 cycles of either docetaxel (100 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) or ixabepilone (40 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> ). Radiotherapy was mandatory after conservative surgery; ER+ patients received endocrine therapy.<br />Results: Seven hundred sixty-two patients were enrolled between October 2007 and September 2010. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. Median follow-up was 66.7 months. Median DFS was not reached; 5-year DFS rate was 76% with docetaxel and 79% with ixabepilone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.10; p = 0.175). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached; 5-year OS rate was 86% versus 84% (HR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.66-1.42; p = 0.897). TNBC patients treated with ixabepilone had a 23% lower risk of relapse compared to docetaxel (HR for DFS = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.53-1.11; p = 0.168). DFS was longer with ixabepilone than docetaxel in patients with grade II-III lymphocytic infiltration (HR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.29-1.05; p = 0.063). All patients experienced ≥1 adverse events (AEs): 75% reported grade III-IV AEs and two (<1%) had grade V AEs (both with neutropenia and infection receiving ixabepilone).<br />Conclusion: After adjuvant FEC, ixabepilone was comparable to docetaxel for treating poor prognosis early BC patients. The benefit of ixabepilone in subgroups (patients with TNBC and grade II-III lymphocytic infiltration) requires further evaluation.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0852
Volume :
103
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30267987
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.025