Search

Background: Osimertinib is a recommended treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR ) mutation and as adjuvant treatment for resected EGFR -mutated NSCLC. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown preliminary efficacy in unresectable stage III EGFR -mutated NSCLC., Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients with unresectable EGFR -mutated stage III NSCLC without progression during or after chemoradiotherapy to receive osimertinib or placebo until disease progression occurred (as assessed by blinded independent central review) or the regimen was discontinued. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review., Results: A total of 216 patients who had undergone chemoradiotherapy were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib (143 patients) or placebo (73 patients). Osimertinib resulted in a significant progression-free survival benefit as compared with placebo: the median progression-free survival was 39.1 months with osimertinib versus 5.6 months with placebo, with a hazard ratio for disease progression or death of 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.24; P<0.001). The percentage of patients who were alive and progression free at 12 months was 74% (95% CI, 65 to 80) with osimertinib and 22% (95% CI, 13 to 32) with placebo. Interim overall survival data (maturity, 20%) showed 36-month overall survival among 84% of patients with osimertinib (95% CI, 75 to 89) and 74% with placebo (95% CI, 57 to 85), with a hazard ratio for death of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.56; P = 0.53). The incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 35% in the osimertinib group and 12% in the placebo group; radiation pneumonitis (majority grade, 1 to 2) was reported in 48% and 38%, respectively. No new safety concerns emerged., Conclusions: Treatment with osimertinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than placebo in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR -mutated NSCLC. (Funded by AstraZeneca; LAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03521154.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Despite improvement in the overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, the effects of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment on bone metastasis remain unclear. This study investigated radiological responses to gefitinib regarding bone metastasis in patients., Methods: We treated 260 patients with NSCLC and symptomatic bone metastasis. Thirty-seven patients harboring EGFR mutation were treated with gefitinib for more than 30 days and followed up for more than 3 months (GEF group). We performed a retrospective observational study by selecting 36 cases without EGFR-TKI treatment, at least 3 months of follow-up, and at least two radiological evaluations as the control group. We assessed the best overall radiological response, interval from treatment initiation to appearance of a radiological response, and the local response maintenance rate., Results: The best effect in the GEF group was 98% partial response or better, which was significantly higher than the 57% observed in the control group (p < 0.001). The GEF and control groups maintained 83% and 42% local response maintenance rates at one year, respectively (p < 0.001). In the GEF with radiotherapy group, the local response maintenance rate was maintained at 92% at 1 year, while in the GEF without RT group, there was a decrease in the local response maintenance rate from 270 days., Conclusion: Gefitinib treatment for bone metastases in patients harboring EGFR mutation resulted in a beneficial osteosclerotic change in most patients. Combined gefitinib and radiotherapy provide long-lasting local control of bone metastases., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Sotorasib showed anticancer activity in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced solid tumors in a phase 1 study, and particularly promising anticancer activity was observed in a subgroup of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: In a single-group, phase 2 trial, we investigated the activity of sotorasib, administered orally at a dose of 960 mg once daily, in patients with KRAS p.G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with standard therapies. The primary end point was objective response (complete or partial response) according to independent central review. Key secondary end points included duration of response, disease control (defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease), progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory biomarkers were evaluated for their association with response to sotorasib therapy., Results: Among the 126 enrolled patients, the majority (81.0%) had previously received both platinum-based chemotherapy and inhibitors of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). According to central review, 124 patients had measurable disease at baseline and were evaluated for response. An objective response was observed in 46 patients (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6 to 46.2), including in 4 (3.2%) who had a complete response and in 42 (33.9%) who had a partial response. The median duration of response was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.9 to could not be evaluated). Disease control occurred in 100 patients (80.6%; 95% CI, 72.6 to 87.2). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 8.2), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.0 to could not be evaluated). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 88 of 126 patients (69.8%), including grade 3 events in 25 patients (19.8%) and a grade 4 event in 1 (0.8%). Responses were observed in subgroups defined according to PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and co-occurring mutations in STK11 , KEAP1 , or TP53 ., Conclusions: In this phase 2 trial, sotorasib therapy led to a durable clinical benefit without new safety signals in patients with previously treated KRAS p.G12C-mutated NSCLC. (Funded by Amgen and the National Institutes of Health; CodeBreaK100 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03600883.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has exhibited efficacy in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a fatal adverse event of osimertinib treatment, and it requires treatment discontinuation. There are few reports regarding the safety and efficacy of osimertinib re-challenge in patients who experienced osimertinib-induced ILD. This retrospective study assessed this treatment option. We retrospectively collected data for patients treated with osimertinib who developed ILD at Shizuoka Cancer Center from April 2016 to March 2020. ILD was diagnosed by two doctors based on imaging tests and blood tests to exclude other causes. Among 215 patients treated with osimertinib, 28 developed ILD. The median age of patients with ILD was 69.5 years (range, 39.0-80.0). In addition, 29% of patients were men, and 46% had a history of smoking. Eleven patients were re-administered EGFR TKIs, including eight patients treated with osimertinib and three patients treated with alternative EGFR TKIs. Among patients re-challenged with osimertinib, none who previously experienced grade 1 ILD exhibited ILD relapse, even with the same osimertinib dose and without the concurrent administration of systemic steroids. Meanwhile, one of the four patients who previously exhibited grade 2 ILD experienced despite a dose reduction for osimertinib and systemic steroid administration. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who experience grade 1 ILD during osimertinib therapy, osimertinib re-challenge may be suitable when no other treatments are available.

Osimertinib is a molecularly targeted agent used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation. However, its efficacy and safety profile when patients have poor performance status (PS) is unknown. Therefore, we conducted an open-label, multi-center, single-arm phase II study to evaluate its efficacy and safety in EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS scores of between 2 and 4. Patients received 80 mg of osimertinib once daily. Our primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Eighteen patients were enrolled between June 2017 and November 2018. The median age was 77 years (range: 55-85 years). Ten, six, and two patients had PS scores of 2, 3, and 4, respectively. All patients had adenocarcinoma with common EGFR mutations and had been treated with first- or second-generation EGFR- tyrosine kinase inhibitors previously. The overall median progression-free survival was 7.0 months (90% confidence interval: 5.5-8.9 months). The overall response rate and median overall survival were 53% and 12.7 months, respectively. Moreover, improved PS scores were observed in 72% of the patients. Although the incidence of grade 3 adverse events was low, with no grade 4 or 5 events observed, three patients required treatment cessation due to the development of interstitial lung disease. Osimertinib therapy could be beneficial for EGFR T790M mutation-positive advanced NSCLC patients with poor PS. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on March 12, 2019 (trial no. jRCT1041180081).

In a subgroup of Japanese patients in the ARCHER 1050 randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety and determined the effects of dose modifications on adverse events (AE) and therapy management of first-line oral dacomitinib 45 mg compared with oral gefitinib 250 mg, each once daily in 28-d cycles, in patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive (EGFR-positive; exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RECIST, version 1.1, by blinded independent review). In 81 Japanese patients (40 dacomitinib, 41 gefitinib), PFS was longer with dacomitinib compared with gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.544 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.307-0.961]; 2-sided P = .0327; median 18.2 for dacomitinib [95% CI, 11.0-31.3] mo, 9.3 [95% CI, 7.4-14.7] mo for gefitinib). The most common Grade 3 AEs were dermatitis acneiform with dacomitinib (27.5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase with gefitinib (12.2%). A higher proportion of patients receiving dacomitinib (85.0%) compared with gefitinib (24.4%) had AEs leading to dose reduction. Incidence and severity of diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, stomatitis and paronychia were generally reduced after dacomitinib dose reductions and dacomitinib treatment duration was generally longer in patients with a dose reduction in comparison with those without a dose reduction. Our results confirmed the efficacy and safety of first-line dacomitinib in Japanese patients with EGFR-positive advanced NSCLC., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Purpose: Severe hepatotoxicity induced by the standard dose of gefitinib (250 mg daily) often becomes manageable by dose reduction to 250 mg every other day. Thus, we hypothesized that systemic exposure of standard-dose gefitinib in patients with experience of severe hepatotoxicity might be higher than that in patients without severe hepatotoxicity., Methods: Patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who were receiving gefitinib either at a reduced dose (250 mg every other day) because of intolerable severe toxicity or at a standard dose (250 mg daily) were enrolled. A series of blood samples were collected to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters and calculate systemic exposure of standard-dose gefitinib (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state, AUC 0-24,ss ). Systemic exposure of unbound gefitinib (fu·AUC 0-24,ss ) was also assessed, because gefitinib is extensively bound to serum proteins., Results: Of the 38 enrolled patients, 34 (23 patients without experience of severe hepatotoxicity, 11 patients with experience of severe hepatotoxicity) were evaluable. There was no significant differences in total AUC 0-24,ss or unbound fu·AUC 0-24,ss between patients with and without experience of severe hepatotoxicity. Analysis of the time to severe hepatotoxicity indicated no difference between patients with a high AUC 0-24,ss and those with a low AUC 0-24,ss of either total or unbound gefitinib., Conclusion: This study suggests that reversible severe hepatotoxicity is not caused by high systemic exposure of gefitinib.

3rd-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including osimertinib, have reasonable efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. However, the efficacy of osimertinib in NSCLC patients with fluids, such as pleural, pericardial and abdominal effusions, is unclear. We evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib in this specific setting. NSCLC patients harboring EGFR T790 M mutations who experienced progressive disease after first EGFR-TKI treatment and started osimertinib treatment between April 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively screened. In particular, we assessed the efficacy of osimertinib for NSCLC with EGFR T790 M mutations in patients who were diagnosed with EGFR T790 M mutation by malignant effusion. Among 90 patients with EGFR T790 M mutation who started osimertinib treatment after EGFR-TKI failure, 21 were diagnosed from malignant effusions excluding cerebrospinal fluid (F group) and 69 using other methods including tissue biopsies (NF group). Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Overall response was 50%, and significantly worse in the F group (29%) than the NF group (57%; P = 0.025). Median progression-free survival with osimertinib treatment in the F group (7.1 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-14.0) was significantly shorter than that in the NF group (11.9 months, 95% CI: 9.5-16.0; P = 0.046)). Median drainage-free time was 10.9 months (95% CI: 1.4 months- not reached). The present study showed that the efficacy of osimertinib for NSCLC in which EGFR T790 M mutation is detected by malignant effusion may be less than in EGFR T790 M-mutated NSCLC detected by other methods.

Background: Liquid biopsy allows the identification of patients whose tumors harbor specific mutations in a minimally invasive manner. No prospective data have been available for the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to first- or second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and who test positive for the TKI resistance-conferring T790M mutation of EGFR by liquid biopsy. Therefore, a phase 2 study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in such patients., Methods: Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent NSCLC with known TKI-sensitizing mutations of EGFR, had documented disease progression after treatment with at least 1 first- or second-generation EGFR TKI, and were positive for the T790M mutation in plasma according to the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics) or droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis. Patients were treated with osimertinib (80 mg/d) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) in patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay., Results: Between June 2016 and November 2017, 276 patients were screened for their T790M status with a liquid biopsy. Seventy-four patients were positive for T790M in plasma, and 53 of these individuals were enrolled in the study. The ORR for evaluable patients positive for T790M in plasma by the Cobas assay (n = 49) was 55.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.2%-69.3%). The median progression-free survival for all evaluable patients (n = 52) was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-12.6 months)., Conclusions: The results demonstrate the utility of liquid biopsy for the detection of T790M with the Cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. Plasma genotyping with this assay is informative for treatment selection in clinical practice when tumor sampling is not feasible., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Pembrolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed death 1 (PD-1), has been shown to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%. We report safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b KEYNOTE-025 study, which evaluated pembrolizumab in Japanese patients with previously treated NSCLC. Eligible patients had histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and had received ≥1 platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg once every 3 weeks for 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety of pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST version 1.1 in patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50%. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and received ≥1 pembrolizumab dose. The median (range) age was 66.0 (41-78) years, and 61% had received ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Eleven patients (29%) experienced grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (AE); 9 patients (24%) experienced immune-mediated AE and infusion reactions, with pneumonitis (11%; any grade) being most common. Among evaluable patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (n = 11), ORR was 27% (95% CI, 6-61). Among evaluable patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% (n = 37), ORR was 22% (95% CI, 10-38). Median (95% CI) progression-free survival and OS were 3.9 (2.0-6.2) months and 19.2 (8.0-26.7) months, respectively. In summary, pembrolizumab was generally well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in Japanese patients with previously treated PD-L1-expressing NSCLC. Outcomes were consistent with those from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-010 study. (Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02007070.)., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Crizotinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has several targets, including c-ros oncogene 1 and the MET proto-oncogene. Considering its known cardiac toxicity, bradycardia is often investigated following treatment with crizotinib. Our patients had bradycardia, QT prolongation, ventricular rhythm, ventricular fibrillation, and pericarditis simultaneously. The cardiotoxicity of crizotinib can sometimes be simultaneous; thus, intensive observation is needed.

Background and Objective: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) are commonly excluded from most clinical trials because of acute exacerbation (AE) of ILD triggered by chemotherapy. Data on the efficacy and feasibility of chemotherapy are limited in this patient population. Recently, the ILD-GAP index and staging system was reported as a clinical prognostic factor associated with mortality in patients with ILD. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of ILD-AE during the surveillance term in this study and the prognosis in patients with NSCLC and ILD using a modified ILD-GAP (ILD-NSCLC-GAP) index scoring system., Materials and Methods: The medical records of patients with NSCLC and ILD who underwent a pulmonary function test before initiation of platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between September 2002 and December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Among these patients, we compared the incidence of ILD-AE, one-year survival rate, and overall survival (OS) between the ILD-NSCLC-GAP index scores and stages., Results: Of the 78 patients included, 21 (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 18%-38%) had ILD-AE during the surveillance term in this study. The one-year survival and median OS rates were 49% and 11.3 months, respectively. The incidence of ILD-AE increased gradually and the one-year survival and median OS rates decreased gradually with increasing ILD-NSCLC-GAP index scores and stages., Conclusion: The ILD-NSCLC-GAP index scoring and staging system may be a useful tool to calculate a prediction of the incidence of ILD-AE and its prognosis for patients with NSCLC and ILD., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Throughout the entire world, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is the standard care for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in whom a favorable therapeutic effect is achieved after front-line treatment, regardless of whether the disease is in the limited stage or extensive stage. In the EORTC study, PCI was shown to confer a survival benefit for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who experienced any positive response after initial chemotherapy. However, the Japan study failed to confirm a survival benefit. As a result, the guidelines in Japan recommend that PCI should not be carried out in cases of ES-SCLC. Complete response (CR) subset analysis in the Japan study suggested that PCI did not provide a survival benefit for patients with ES-SCLC. PCI with a risk of adverse events has poor significance, even if the patients show CR to chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Osimertinib is a potent, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for EGFR-TKI sensitizing (EGFRm) and T790M resistance mutations. The primary objective of the cytology cohort in the AURA study was to investigate safety and efficacy of osimertinib in pretreated Japanese patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with screening EGFR T790M mutation status determined from cytology samples. The cytology cohort was included in the Phase I dose expansion component of the AURA study. Patients were enrolled based on a positive result of T790M by using cytology samples, and received osimertinib 80 mg in tablet form once daily until disease progression or until clinical benefit was no longer observed at the discretion of the investigator. Primary endpoint for efficacy was objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment. Twenty-eight Japanese patients were enrolled into the cytology cohort. At data cut-off (February 1, 2016), 12 (43%) were on treatment. Investigator-assessed ORR was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55, 89) and median duration of response was 9.7 months (95% CI 3.8, not calculable [NC]). Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 4.2, NC) and disease control rate was 96% (95% CI 82, 100). The most common all-causality adverse events were paronychia (46%), dry skin (46%), diarrhea (36%) and rash (36%). Osimertinib provided clinical benefit with a manageable safety profile in patients with pretreated EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC whose screening EGFR T790M mutation-positive status was determined from cytology samples. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01802632)., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: T790M, a secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, accounts for approximately 50% of acquired resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To facilitate the use of third-generation EGFR-TKIs to potentially overcome T790M-mediated resistance, we evaluated the clinical factors influencing the incidence of T790M mutation., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively screened patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations with progressive disease who were rebiopsied between January 2013 and December 2016. Factors influencing T790M status were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis., Results: Among 131 rebiopsied patients for whom EGFR mutation status was available, 58 (44%) had T790M mutations. Patient characteristics at rebiopsy were not significantly different between T790M-positive and -negative groups, except for surgical history (postsurgery recurrence). Total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment before rebiopsy, TKI-free interval, EGFR-TKI treatment history immediately before rebiopsy, continuation of initial EGFR-TKI beyond progressive disease, progression-free survival after initial TKI treatment, and rebiopsy site (other than fluid samples) significantly influenced T790M status. The incidence of T790M mutation was shown by multivariate analysis to be significantly higher in patients with postsurgery recurrence and total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment ≥ 1 year before rebiopsy (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-15.7 and odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-19.8, respectively)., Conclusion: Postsurgery recurrence and longer total duration of EGFR-TKI treatment before rebiopsy may represent useful predictive markers for T790M detection. In patients with these clinical factors, rebiopsies are more recommended to detect T790M mutation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cancer cachexia in elderly patients may substantially impact physical function and medical dependency. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of cachexia on activity of daily living (ADL), length of hospital stay, and inpatient medical costs among elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving chemotherapy., Methods: Thirty patients aged ≥70 years with advanced NSCLC (stage III-IV) scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy were prospectively enrolled between January 2013 and November 2014. ADL was assessed using the Barthel index. The disability-free survival time (DFS) was calculated as the time between the date of study entry and the date of onset of a disabling event, which was defined as a 10-point decrease in the Barthel index from that at baseline. The mean cumulative function of the length of hospital stay and inpatient medical costs (¥, Japanese yen) was calculated., Results: The study patients comprised 11 women and 19 men, with a median age of 74 (range, 70-82) years. Cachexia was diagnosed in 19 (63%) patients. Cachectic patients had a shorter DFS (7.5 vs. 17.1 months, p < 0.05). During the first year from study entry, cachectic patients had longer cumulative lengths of hospital stay (80.7 vs. 38.5 days/person, p < 0.05), more frequent unplanned hospital visits or hospitalizations (4.2 vs. 1.7 times/person, p < 0.05), and higher inpatient medical costs (¥3.5 vs. ¥2.1 million/person, p < 0.05) than non-cachectic patients., Conclusions: Elderly NSCLC patients with cachexia showed higher risks for disability, prolonged hospitalizations, and higher inpatient medical costs while receiving chemotherapy than patients without cachexia. Our results might indicate that there is a potential need for an early intervention to minimize progression to or development of cachexia, improve functional prognosis, and reduce healthcare resource burden in this population., Trial Registration: Trial registration number: UMIN000009768 . Name of registry: UMIN (University hospital Medical Information Network). Date of registration: 14 January 2013. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 23 January 2013.

Purpose: Despite the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy for patients who have undergone surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), few reports have presented survival data for Asian patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy involving a combination of CDDP and vinorelbine (VNR). This study was performed to evaluate the survival of patients with NSCLC who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy comprising CDDP + VNR., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with NSCLC who received adjuvant chemotherapy comprising CDDP + VNR at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between February 2006 and October 2011., Results: One hundred patients who underwent surgical resection of NSCLC were included in this study. The patients' characteristics were as follows: median age 63 years (range 36-74 years), female 34%, never-smokers 20%, and non-squamous NSCLC 73%. Pathological stages IIA, IIB, and IIIA were observed in 31, 22, and 47% of patients, respectively. The 5- and 2-year overall survival rates were 73 and 93%, respectively. The 5- and 2-year relapse-free survival rates were 53 and 62%, respectively. Univariate analysis of prognostic factors showed that patient characteristics (sex, histology, and pathological stage) and CDDP dose intensity were not significantly associated with survival. In 48 patients who developed NSCLC recurrence, the 5-year survival rate after recurrence was 29%, and the median survival time after recurrence was 37 months., Conclusions: Our results suggest that the prognosis after surgical resection of NSCLC and adjuvant chemotherapy comprising CDDP + VNR might be improving compared with previous survival data of adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC.

Background: Currently, no markers predictive of response to nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are currently recognized in Japan. The present study was undertaken to identify such markers., Materials and Methods: Medical records of 50 patients with advanced NSCLC and treated with nivolumab monotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center between December 2015 and April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The parameters studied were age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, smoking history, histological diagnosis, epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase status, therapeutic line of nivolumab, efficacy of treatment immediately before nivolumab monotherapy, and time since previous therapy., Results: The objective response rate to nivolumab monotherapy was 18% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-31]. Multivariate logistic regression identified "squamous histology" [odds ratio (OR) 0.00054; 95% CI 0-0.27] and "response to the treatment immediately before nivolumab monotherapy" (OR 0.0011; 95% CI 0-0.092) as independently associated with response to nivolumab monotherapy., Conclusion: "Response to the treatment immediately before nivolumab monotherapy" might be a predictive marker of response to nivolumab in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Purpose: Extravasation, or leakage of vesicant drugs into subcutaneous tissues, causes serious complications such as induration and necrosis in chemotherapy-treated patients. As macroscopic observation may overlook symptoms during infusion, we focused on skin temperature changes at puncture sites and studied thermographic patterns related to induration or necrosis caused by extravasation., Methods: Outpatients undergoing chemotherapy using peripheral intravenous catheters were enrolled in this prospective observational study. We filmed and classified infrared thermography movies of puncture sites during infusion; ultrasonography was also utilized at puncture sites to observe the subcutaneous condition. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association of thermographic patterns with induration or necrosis observed on the next chemotherapy day. Differences in patient characteristics, puncture sites, and infusions were analyzed by Mann-Whitney's U test and Fisher's exact test according to thermographic patterns., Results: Eight patients developed induration among 74 observations in 62 patients. Among six thermographic patterns, a fan-shaped lower temperature area gradually spreading from the puncture site (fan at puncture site) was significantly associated with induration. Ultrasonography revealed that catheters of patients with fan at puncture site remained in the vein at the end of infusion, indicating that the infusion probably leaked from the puncture site. Patients with fan at puncture site had no significant differences in characteristics and infusion conditions compared with those with the other five thermographic patterns., Conclusion: We determined that fan at puncture site was related to induration caused by extravasation. Continuous thermographic observation may enable us to predict adverse events of chemotherapy., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Limited treatment options are available for stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab, a programmed cell death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of NSCLC. The present study investigated the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent squamous NSCLC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy. In this multicenter phase II study, patients were treated with nivolumab (3 mg/kg, i.v.) every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity was seen. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiology review committee (IRC) and secondary endpoints included a study site-assessed ORR, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, time to response, best overall response (BOR), and safety. The study included 35 patients from 17 sites in Japan. Patients had IRC-assessed ORR of 25.7% (95% CI 14.2, 42.1) and the study site-assessed ORR was 20.0% (95% CI 10.0, 35.9). Median OS, median time to response and median PFS were 16.3 (95% CI 12.4-25.4), 2.7 (range 1.2-5.5) and 4.2 (95% CI 1.4-7.1) months, respectively. The IRC-assessed BOR was partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease for 25.7%, 28.6%, and 45.7% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 24 patients (68.6%), most of which resolved with appropriate treatment including steroid therapy or ‎discontinuation of nivolumab. Nivolumab was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent squamous NSCLC that progressed after platinum-containing chemotherapy., Clinical Trial Registration Number: JapicCTI-132072., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objectives To determine the recommended dose and efficacy/safety of docetaxel combined with resminostat (DR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with previous platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods A multicenter, open-label, phase I/II study was performed in Japanese patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy. The recommended phase II dose was determined using a standard 3 + 3 dose design in phase I part. Resminostat was escalated from 400 to 600 mg/day and docetaxel fixed at 75 mg/m 2 . In phase II part, the patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (75 mg/m 2 ) or DR therapy. Docetaxel was administered on day 1 and resminostat on days 1-5 in the DR group. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 117 patients (phase I part, 9; phase II part, 108) were enrolled. There was no dose-limiting toxicity in phase I part; the recommended dose for resminostat was 600 mg/day with 75 mg/m 2 of docetaxel. In phase II part, median PFS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 4.2 (2.8-5.7) months with docetaxel group and 4.1 (1.5-5.4) months with DR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.354, 95% CI: 0.835-2.195; p = 0.209). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events significantly more common with DR group than docetaxel group were leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anorexia. Conclusion In Japanese NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, DR therapy did not improve PFS compared with docetaxel alone and increased toxicity.

We report a case of a 38-year-old woman who was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R mutation on exon 21 and a T790 M mutation on exon 20. The patient was treated with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) following treatment with nivolumab, an anti-Programmed Cell Death 1 (anti-PD1) antibody. After initiating osimertinib treatment, the patient began to complain of low-grade fever and shortness of breath without hypoxemia, and her chest radiograph and a CT scan revealed a remarkable antitumor response, although faint infiltrations were observed in the bilateral lung field. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid mainly contained lymphocytes (CD4+/CD8+ ratio of 0.3), and a transbronchial lung biopsy specimen showed lymphocytic alveolitis with partial organization in several alveolar spaces. Therefore we diagnosed the patient with osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) after treatment with anti-PD1 antibody. We considered anti-PD1 therapies may be the risk factor of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards Conflicts of interest HK has received grants and honoraria from AstraZeneca K.K., personal fees from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. TT has received grants and honoraria from AstraZeneca K.K., grants and honoraria from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. ME has received honoraria from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. NM has no conflicts of interest to declare. MK has no conflicts of interest to declare. TN has no conflicts of interest to declare. Funding There is no funding about this case report. Ethical approval All procedures performed in the human participant were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Background: The majority of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation eventually develop resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Minimal information exists regarding genetic alterations in rebiopsy samples from Asian NSCLC patients who develop acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who had undergone rebiopsies after developing acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. We analyzed 27 practicable samples using a tumor genotyping panel to assess 23 hot-spot sites of genetic alterations in nine genes (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, MEK1, AKT1, PTEN, and HER2), gene copy number of EGFR, MET, PIK3CA, FGFR1, and FGFR2, and ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions. Additionally, 34 samples were analyzed by commercially available EGFR mutation tests., Results: Sixty-one patients underwent rebiopsy. Twenty-seven samples were analyzed using our tumor genotyping panel, and 34 samples were analyzed for EGFR mutations only by commercial clinical laboratories. Twenty-one patients (34 %) had EGFR T790M mutation. Using our tumor genotyping panel, MET gene copy number gain was observed in two of 27 (7 %) samples. Twenty patients received continuous treatment with EGFR-TKIs even after disease progression, and 11 of these patients had T790M mutation in rebiopsy samples. In contrast, only 10 of 41 patients who finished EGFR-TKI treatment at disease progression had T790M mutation. The frequency of T790M mutation in patients who received continuous treatment with EGFR-TKIs after disease progression was significantly higher than that in patients who finished EGFR-TKI treatment at disease progression (55 % versus 24 %, p = 0.018)., Conclusions: The frequency of T790M mutation in this study was lower than that in previous reports examining western patients. These results suggest that continuous treatment with EGFR-TKI after disease progression may enhance the frequency of EGFR T790M mutation in rebiopsy samples.

Background Atezolizumab is an engineered immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody that targets the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 pathway. Methods In this phase I dose-finding study, we assessed the safety, feasibility, pharmacokinetics (PK), and exploratory anti-tumor activity of atezolizumab monotherapy up to 20 mg/kg in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors who had failed standard therapy or for whom there is no standard therapy. Results Six patients were enrolled and received intravenous atezolizumab every 3 weeks (q3w) at doses of 10 or 20 mg/kg. Tumor types were non-small cell lung cancer (n = 3), melanoma (n = 1), pancreatic cancer (n = 1), and thymic cancer (n = 1). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. All adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2 in severity. No discontinuations or deaths due to AEs were observed. As of the data cutoff, no partial responses were observed; however, stable disease was observed in all six patients. The maximum mean serum atezolizumab concentration was 220 μg/mL (SD ± 21.9), with 10-mg/kg dosing and 536 μg/mL (SD ± 49.4) with 20-mg/kg dosing. Three patients were still on treatment, and three of the six had achieved a progression-free survival of >12 months. Conclusions Atezolizumab was well tolerated in Japanese patients at doses up to 20 mg/kg q3w. The safety profile and Cycle 1 serum atezolizumab concentrations were similar to those previously observed in non-Japanese patients. These data support the participation of Japanese patients in ongoing pivotal global studies of atezolizumab., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards Conflicts of interest Hidenori Mizugaki has nothing to disclose. Noboru Yamamoto reports grants from Chugai, grants from Eli Lilly, grants from Taiho, grants from Eisai, grants from Quintiles, grants from Astellas, grants from BMS, grants from Novartis, grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, grants from Pfizer, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, grants from Bayer, outside the submitted work. Haruyasu Murakami reports personal fees from Chugai, outside the submitted work; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu reports personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., outside the submitted work. Yutaka Fujiwara reports grants from AstraZeneca, grants from Eli Lilly, grants from Eisai, grants from MerckSerono, grants from Chugai, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. Yoshimasa Ishida is a full time employee of Chugai Pharmaceutical. Tomohisa Kawakami is a full time employee of Chugai Pharmaceutical. Toshiaki Takahashi reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K., grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, INC, outside the submitted work. Ethical approval Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study was approved by the institutional review board at the National Cancer Center and Shizuoka Cancer Center and was conducted in accordance with Japanese Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the study protocol, the standards stipulated in Paragraph 3 of Article 14 and Article 80–2 of the Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, Regenerative and Cellular Therapy Products, Gene Therapy Products, and Cosmetics (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Act), and the Ministerial Ordinance on Good Clinical Practice for Drugs (GCP).

A 57-year-old male current smoker was diagnosed with an aggressive variant of ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) arising in the pleural cavity. First line treatment with ASP3026 was initiated at a dose of 125mg once daily. A follow-up CT scan revealed drastic regression of the pleural lesion. After disease progression with ASP3026 treatment, LDK378 (ceritinib) was initiated at a dose of 750mg once daily. A follow-up CT scan revealed a second drastic regression of the pleural lesion. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that this case represents the use of serum hyaluronan levels to assist in monitoring of treatment efficacy in an IMT. Herein, we present the first case of a patient with a highly aggressive ALK-rearranged IMT arising in the pleural cavity, who showed both initial and subsequent drastic response to two ALK inhibitors while being monitored for serum hyaluronan., (Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: It is unclear whether there is a difference in the effect of gefitinib treatment between patients with postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and those with stage IV NSCLC harboring mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC (postoperative group) or stage IV NSCLC (stage IV group) harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between September 2002 and March 2012 to compare the effect of gefitinib on survival from treatment initiation., Results: A total of 168 patients were treated with gefitinib (postoperative group, 49 patients; stage IV group, 119 patients). The response rate of gefitinib treatment in the postoperative group was similar to that in the stage IV group (58 vs. 61 %, p = 0.613). In contrast, median progression-free survival (PFS; 15.8 vs. 9.8 months, p < 0.001) and median overall survival (OS; 51.1 vs. 22.2 months, p < 0.001) were significantly longer in the postoperative group. In addition, postoperative recurrent disease, performance status (0-1), and a single metastatic organ were independent favorable prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis of survival., Conclusions: PFS and OS were superior in patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations treated by gefitinib than in those with stage IV disease. These results suggest that postoperative recurrent disease may be considered a stratification factor in clinical trials for NSCLC with EGFR mutations.

Introduction: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is sensitive to ALK inhibitors, but resistance develops. This study assessed the maximum-tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of ceritinib, a novel ALK inhibitor (ALKi), in Japanese patients with ALK-rearranged malignancies., Methods: This phase I, multicenter, open-label study (NCT01634763) enrolled adult patients with ALK-rearranged (by fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or immunohistochemistry) locally advanced/metastatic malignancy that had progressed despite standard therapy. The study comprised two parts: dose escalation and dose expansion. Ceritinib (single-dose) was administered orally in the 3-day PK run-in period, then once daily, in 21-day cycles. Adaptive dose escalations were guided by a Bayesian model., Results: Twenty patients (80% with ALKi treatment history [ALKi-pretreated]; 19 NSCLC; one inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor) received ceritinib 300 to 750 mg (19 during dose escalation, one in dose expansion). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred: grade 3 lipase increase (600 mg); grade 3 drug-induced liver injury (750 mg). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea: 95%; diarrhea, vomiting: 75%). Ceritinib PK profile was dose proportional across 300 to 750 mg dosages; steady state was reached by day 15. Overall response rate was 55% (11 of 20 patients). Among patients with NSCLC, partial response was observed in two of four ALKi-naive patients, five of nine crizotinib-pretreated patients, two of four alectinib-pretreated patients, and one of two crizotinib and alectinib/ASP3026 pretreated patients. The ASP3026-pretreated inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor patient achieved partial response., Conclusions: Ceritinib maximum-tolerated dose was 750 mg once daily in Japanese patients. Antitumor activity was observed irrespective of prior ALKi treatment history. Dose expansion, examining the activity of ceritinib in alectinib-resistant patients, is ongoing.

Second-line chemotherapy has been established for non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC)and sensitive relapsed small cell lung cancer(SCLC).Molecular targeted drugs, such as EGFR- and ALK-inhibitors, have improved survival outcome remarkably in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations or EML4-ALK fusion proteins.In addition, targeted drugs that may overcome T790M-mediated EGFR-TKI resistance have been developed, and the development of future therapeutic strategies is anticipated.On the other hand, molecular targeted drugs against SCLC have not yet been developed.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of rechallenge with current induction regimens for sensitive-relapse small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients., Methods: We defined sensitive relapse as treatment-free interval (TFI≥90 d). Sensitive-relapse SCLC patients who received second-line chemotherapy were separated into those treated with rechallenge chemotherapy (rechallenge group) and those treated with other regimens (other group). The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and toxicity., Results: Sixty-five patients (19 rechallenge group and 46 other group) were assessable for efficacy and safety evaluation. No significant differences in age, sex, ECOG performance status at relapse, disease extent at diagnosis, or response to first-line treatment were found between the 2 groups, but TFI was significantly longer in the rechallenge group. Twenty-one patients of the other group received amrubicin. There was no significant difference in OS between the 2 groups (median survival time [MST]: rechallenge group, 14.4 mo; other group, 13.1 mo; P=0.51). In the patients treated with amrubicin, MST was 12.6 months. Comparing the rechallenge group with the patients treated with amrubicin, there was also no significant difference in OS (P=0.38). Both the rechallenge and other group included 11 patients with ex-sensitive relapse (TFI≥180 d). There was no significant difference in OS between the 2 groups (MST 15.7 vs. 26.9 mo, P=0.46)., Conclusions: Rechallenge chemotherapy did not prove superior to other chemotherapies, suggesting that monotherapy, such as amrubicin, might be reasonable as second-line chemotherapy for sensitive-relapse SCLC patients.

Pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is a rare extranodal lymphoma with a 5-year survival rate of 80-95 %. There is no standard treatment strategy for pulmonary MALT lymphoma. In the present study, we performed a retrospective evaluation of systemic rituximab monotherapy (375 mg m(-2) day(-1), 4-8 cycles) as first-line treatment in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma. Of the eight patients enrolled, five achieved complete response, one achieved partial response, and two showed stable disease. Median progression-free survival was 66.0 months (range 9.7-87.2 months). Treatment was well tolerated and all patients were alive during the median follow-up period of 64.0 months. Rituximab monotherapy was efficacious in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma, demonstrating long-term disease stabilization and symptom reduction. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further assess the efficacy of rituximab monotherapy. In conclusion, rituximab monotherapy may be considered for first-line therapy in patients with pulmonary MALT lymphoma.

Background: Efatutazone is a highly selective agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), a therapeutic target for carcinogenesis., Patients and Methods: In this phase I dose-escalation study, we assessed the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of efatutazone and the recommended dose (RD) was determined in Japanese patients with metastatic solid tumors using a 3+3 design., Results: A total of 13 patients were enrolled and received efatutazone at doses of 0.25 mg, 0.50 mg, and 0.75 mg bid for multiple 3-week cycles. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Partial response was confirmed in one patient and stable disease in three. Efatutazone exposure was almost dose-proportional. RD was determined to be 0.50 mg bid, corresponding to the RD in previous global phase I studies., Conclusion: Efatutazone demonstrated acceptable toxicity and gave evidence of disease control in Japanese patients with metastatic solid tumors., (Copyright© 2014 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) are effective for non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with EGFR-activating mutations. However, most responders develop resistance. Efatutazone, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, is currently under clinical evaluation; it has antiproliferative effects and induces cellular morphological changes and differentiation. The present study investigated the effects of efatutazone in EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC cells, while focusing on cell motility. The PC-9-derived NSCLC cell lines PC-9ER and PC-9ZD, resistant to EGFR-TKI due to v-crk avian sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog-like (CRKL) amplification-induced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT) activation and an EGFR T790M mutation, respectively, were used. These cells exhibit enhanced cell motility due to transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)/Smad2 family member 2 (Smad2) pathway activation. Efatutazone had no growth-inhibitory effect on the tested cells but inhibited the motility of EGFR-TKI-resistant cells in wound closure and transwell assays. Efatutazone plus erlotinib treatment provided greater inhibition of PC-9ER cell migration than efatutazone or erlotinib alone. Efatutazone suppressed increased TGF-β2 secretion from both cell lines (shown by ELISA) and downregulation of TGF-β2 transcription (observed by quantitative RT-PCR). Immunoblot analysis and luciferase assays revealed that efatutazone suppressed Smad2 phosphorylation and its transcriptional activity. These results suggest that efatutazone inhibits cell motility by antagonizing the TGF-β/Smad2 pathway and effectively prevents metastasis in NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI regardless of the resistance mechanism., (© 2014 The Authors. Cancer Science published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background/aim: Mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not fully-understood. In this study we aimed to elucidate remaining unknown mechanisms using erlotinib-resistant NSCLC cells., Materials and Methods: We performed array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to identify genomic aberrations associated with EGFR-TKI resistance in erlotinib-resistant PC-9ER cells. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunoblot analyses were performed to confirm the results of aCGH., Results: Among the five regions with copy number gain detected in PC-9ER cells, we focused on 22q11.2-q12.1 including v-crk avian sarcoma virus CT10 oncogene homolog-like (CRKL), the overexpression of which seemed to be associated with EGFR-TKI resistance. Blockade of downstream phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog (AKT) signaling using NVP-BEZ235 suppressed the proliferation of PC-9ER cells, implying the involvement of acquired CRKL amplification in EGFR-TKI resistance., Conclusion: Acquired CRKL amplification was identified as contributing to EGFR-TKI resistance; this cell line model can be utilized to study this resistance mechanism.

Purpose: Nimotuzumab is a humanized IgG₁ monoclonal antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and has demonstrated the absence of severe dermatological toxicity commonly caused by other EGFR-targeting antibodies. We conducted a phase I study to assess toxicities, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and predictive biomarkers of nimotuzumab administered in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors., Methods: Three dose levels, 100, 200, and 400 mg, of weekly i.v. nimotuzumab were given until disease progression or drug intolerability. Four patients with solid tumors were enrolled in each dose level. The expression and gene copy number of EGFR or its downstream transducers were investigated using skin biopsy samples and tumor specimens., Results: Planned dose escalation was completed without dose-limiting toxicity, and maximum tolerated dose was not reached. No allergic reaction and hypomagnesaemia were observed, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity did not occur. The common toxicity was skin rash (58 %); however, all of them were grade 1 or 2. In skin biopsies, no correlation was shown between doses and the phosphorylation of EGFR or its downstream signal transducers. Of 11 evaluable patients, no objective response was obtained, while 8 patients had stable disease (73 %). Patients with a higher-EGFR gene copy number level measured by FISH showed a longer time to progression., Conclusions: Nimotuzumab administered weekly was feasible and well tolerated up to 400 mg in Japanese patients. A low dermatological toxicity could be a notable advantage as anti-EGFR mAb, and further evaluation is warranted.

Background: There is no standard therapy for relapsed patients who have received postoperative platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated the efficacy and safety of platinum combination chemotherapy re-challenge for such patients., Methods: Medical records from 3 institutes from April 2005 to July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent complete surgical resection were eligible if they received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin plus vinorelbine once and then re-challenge with platinum combination chemotherapy., Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled in this study. After re-challenge with platinum combination chemotherapy, we observed an overall response rate of 31.2% (5/16) and a disease control rate of 81.2% (13/16). Median progression-free survival and overall survival from the start of the re-administration of platinum combination chemotherapy were 6.5 and 28.0 months, respectively. Frequently observed severe adverse events (≥grade 3) included neutropenia (31.2%), thrombocytopenia (31.2%), leukopenia (12.5%) and hyponatremia (12.5%). Frequently observed non-hematological toxicities (≥grade 2) were anorexia (37.5%) and nausea (37.5%)., Conclusion: Re-challenge with platinum combination chemotherapy was effective and safe; therefore, this therapy should be considered as a treatment option for relapsed patients after postoperative cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected NSCLC., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) is an oral, irreversible, small molecule inhibitor of human epidermal growth factor receptor-1, -2, and -4 tyrosine kinases., Methods: This phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00783328) primarily evaluated the safety and tolerability of dacomitinib by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and determined the clinically recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Dacomitinib was administered orally at three dose levels (15, 30, or 45 mg once daily [QD]). Patients initially received a single dose, and after 9 days of follow-up, continuously QD in 21-day cycles. Endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity., Results: Thirteen patients were assigned to the three dose levels (15 mg cohort: n = 3; 30 mg cohort: n = 3; 45 mg cohort: n = 7) according to a traditional '3 + 3' design. None of the treated patients experienced a DLT. Toxicities were manageable and similar in type to those observed in other studies. PK concentration parameters increased with dose over the range evaluated, with no evidence of accumulation over time. Of 13 evaluable patients, one with NSCLC (adenocarcinoma) had a partial response and nine patients had stable disease., Conclusions: Dacomitinib 45 mg QD was defined as the RP2D and demonstrated preliminary activity in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Purpose: This study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant and dexamethasone as well as the relationship between the plasma concentration of substance P and nausea/vomiting in Japanese cancer patients., Methods: After administration of aprepitant (125/80 mg group [10 patients]: 125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2-5; 40/25 mg group [10 patients]: 40 mg on day 1 and 25 mg on days 2-5) and dexamethasone (6 mg on day 1 and 4 mg on days 2 and 3 in the 125/80 mg group, and 8 mg on day 1 and 6 mg on days 2 and 3 in the 40/25 mg group) to Japanese cancer patients receiving at least moderately emetogenic antitumor agents, the plasma concentrations of aprepitant, dexamethasone, and substance P were measured., Results: All of 20 patients were treated with the highly emetogenic agent cisplatin (≥70 mg/m(2)). The C(max) and AUC(0-24 h) of aprepitant in Japanese cancer patients were similar with those in non-Japanese patients. The clearance of dexamethasone in the 125/80 mg group was approximately one-half of that previously determined in the absence of aprepitant. The substance P concentration in plasma significantly increased only in patients with delayed nausea/vomiting., Conclusions: This study demonstrated similar plasma pharmacokinetics of aprepitant in Japanese and non-Japanese, the validity of reducing dexamethasone dose, and the existence of increased plasma substance P concentration in patients receiving highly emetogenic cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

The efficacy of gefitinib for patients with non-adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is unclear, because only a small percentage of patients enrolled in the clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of gefitinib for tumors harboring EGFR mutation were non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC. A pooled analysis was conducted to clarify the efficacy of gefitinib for non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. A systematic search of the PUBMED databases was conducted to identify all clinical reports that contained advanced non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations and treated with gefitinib. The selected patients were advanced non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with gefitinib and described in reports containing the data of the histology, status of EGFR mutations and response to gefitinib. This study selected 33 patients from 15 reports. Twenty-seven and three of the 33 patients were squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma, respectively. One patient each had large-cell carcinoma, pleomorphic carcinoma and spindle cell carcinoma. Twenty-one patients (64%) had sensitive EGFR mutations. The response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 27%, 67-70% and 3.0 months, respectively. These factors were statistically significantly inferior in the non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations to adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutations selected from the same published reports (RR: 27%vs 66%, P = 0.000028; DCR: 67-70%vs 92-93%, P = 0.000014; mPFS: 3.0 vs 9.4 months, P = 0.0001, respectively). Gefitinib is less effective in non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations than adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations., (© 2011 Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: The standard therapy for young patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is platinum doublet therapy, whereas that for elderly patients with NSCLC is single-agent therapy. However, there is limited information about the platinum-based treatment for elderly patients., Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of platinum-doublet therapy for elderly patients, retrospectively., Methods: There were 76 patients 75 years old or more with advanced NSCLC for whom chemotherapy was performed between June, 2008 and January, 2005. Among them, 65 patients except for 11 who underwent first-line gefitinib therapy were retrospectively reviewed., Results: Median age: 77 years old (range 75-83 years old), gender: male/female; 51/14, stage: III B/ IV ; 15/50, pathology: adeno/squamous/other; 41/13/11, PS: 0/1/2; 14/44/7 patients. Fifty-three patients received single-agent (S), whereas 12 patients received platinum-doublet (D). Even in the analysis of patients with PS 0-1, similar results were obtained. Progression-free survival (PFS)was 107 versus 85 days, and overall survival(OS)was 270 versus 262 days between S and D, in patients with PS 0-1. In addition, we did not recognize a large difference in toxicity between S and D., Conclusion: In this examination, we could not show a large difference in efficacy and toxicity between platinum-doublet therapy and single-agent therapy. Further study would be needed to confirm our results.

Gefitinib and erlotinib are commercially available epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) that are widely used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Acute severe liver injury, although rare, has been observed in patients receiving these EGFR-TKIs. Some studies have reported that erlotinib treatment does not cause severe liver toxicity in patients with NSCLC who previously presented with severe liver injury during the course of gefitinib treatment. We retrospectively assessed the occurrence of liver toxicity in patients with NSCLC who were receiving erlotinib and had previously presented with severe gefitinib-induced liver injury.Severe liver injury occurred in only 1 of the 8 patients receiving erlotinib treatment. In this case, erlotinib was discontinued because of the onset of grade 3 skin rash and liver injury. After liver function was restored, erlotinib (100 mg) was administered at a lower dose; nonetheless, grade 4 liver injury occurred. Our findings suggest that it is necessary not only to explain the early symptoms of liver toxicity to patients who are receiving erlotinib treatment and have previously experienced gefitinib-induced severe liver injury but also to more closely monitor liver function.

Purpose: The use of erlotinib after gefitinib failure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not clearly clarified in clinical practice. We sought to compile the available clinical reports to better understand the effectiveness of erlotinib after failure of gefitinib., Methods: We searched published reports including erlotinib and gefitinib. Eleven reports were identified (published between November 2004 and December 2008). Advanced NSCLC who documented progressive disease (PD) for gefitinib 250 mg/day, received erlotinib 150 mg once daily., Results: A total of 106 patients were pooled from these studies. Asian was observed in 70.8%, women in 72.6%, adenocarcinoma in 85.1%, never smoker in 75.3%. In erlotinib therapy, there was observed in 9.9% in partial response (PR), 18.9% in stable disease (SD) and 70.8% in PD. Disease control (DC) rate for gefitinib and erlotinib was 71.7% and 29.2%, respectively. No significant difference of disease control rate (37.5% vs 21.7%, p=0.1503) and response rate (6.3% vs 8.7%, p=1.000) was observed between patients with EGFR mutations and those with wild type EGFR. The significantly different response on erlotinib therapy was observed in patients who had shown SD for gefitinib therapy (p=0.0095) and those who had a PFS of more than 6 months during gefitinib treatment (p=0.0261). The common toxicities were skin rash and diarrhea., Conclusion: Erlotinib may produce clinical benefits in patients who had shown long SD on prior gefitinib therapy. Moreover, EGFR mutations were not positive predictors for erlotinib response after gefitinib failure., (Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of long-term survival of more than 5 years in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Methods: One-hundred and twenty-four patients with advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy from September 2002 to October 2003 were reviewed., Results: Ten (8%) patients survived for more than 5 years. The median survival time (MST) for the 10 patients was 61.5 months, ranging from 60.1 to 81.0 months. All of the 10 patients had performance status (PS) 0 or 1 and adenocarcinoma. As the initial treatment, 9 patients were treated with a platinum-containing chemotherapy [median progressive free survival (PFS), 10.7 months] and 8 patients received gefitinib as the second or third line chemotherapy (median PFS, 28.7 months). Nine patients received cytotoxic agents after first line chemotherapy (median duration of the chemotherapy, 22.4 months). A mean regimen of chemotherapy was three (range, 1-8). Re-challenge of gefitinib was performed in 2 patients, and surgical resection of solitary brain metastasis was performed as the initial treatment in 2 patients., Conclusion: Our results suggest that good performance status, adenocarcinoma and EGFR-TKI therapy play an important role in the long-term survivors of more than 5 years.

Gefitinib is an orally active, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is widely used in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Erlotinib, which has the same mechanism of action as gefitinib, has been recently approved in Japan. We retrospectively investigated the adverse reactions in 16 patients who had received erlotinib after failure of gefitinib treatment. We examined the adverse reactions that occurred during gefitinib or erlotinib treatment using an electronic chart system. Anorexia was more frequent with erlotinib than with gefitinib treatment. Further, anorexia and diarrhea were significantly more severe with erlotinib than with gefitinib treatment. Most adverse reactions developed earlier during the course of erlotinib treatment than during the course of gefitinib treatment. In one patient who had received gefitinib treatment without pulmonary toxicity, erlotinib had to be discontinued due to the development of interstitial pneumonia. Our findings suggest that adverse reactions such as anorexia and diarrhea should be carefully monitored soon after starting erlotinib in advanced NSCLC patients in whom gefitinib treatment has been ineffective, because these reactions will occur sooner and would be more severe in erlotinib treatment.

Background: No investigation of amrubicin monotherapy in pre-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has yet been reported., Patients and Methods: The records were reviewed of NSCLC patients who had received amrubicin monotherapy between 2003 and 2007 with the following eligibility criteria:previously treated with at least two regimens including platinum and docetaxel for non-adenocarcinoma patients and platinum, docetaxel and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) for adenocarcinoma patients. Amrubicin was administered to both groups at 35 mg/m2 or 40 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days, every 3 weeks., Results: Thirty-nine patients were registered. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was three (range: 2 to 7). The median number of courses per patient was three (range one to 9). The toxicity profile was acceptable with no grade 3 or higher non-hematological toxicity. The overall response rate was 10.2%. The median survival time was 4.8 months., Conclusion: Amrubicin exhibits activity and acceptable toxicity as third or subsequent line of chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

Background: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia is a common occurrence in patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. However, the relationship between chemotherapy‐induced anorexia and weight loss during platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear. This study explored the relationship between chemotherapy‐induced anorexia and therapeutic outcomes in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer undergoing platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 106 patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors between January 2019 and October 2022. The incidence of weight loss and its association with treatment efficacy was assessed in the chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group. Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. Progression‐free and overall survival were used to measure treatment efficacy. Results: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia was observed in 13.2% of patients. These patients exhibited significant weight loss at 6 and 9 weeks after treatment initiation compared to those in the non‐chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group. Progression‐free and overall survival were shorter in the chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group than in the non‐chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia was associated with significant weight loss and reduced treatment efficacy in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer. These results highlight the importance of implementing robust supportive care for chemotherapy‐induced anorexia to mitigate weight loss and uphold treatment effectiveness during platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Which patients benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. There have been few reports on the efficacy of ICIs based on conventional immunohistochemical neuroendocrine (NE) markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM]). In the present study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the expression of immunohistochemical NE markers and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with extensive disease (ED)‐SCLC, to assess whether conventional NE markers are predictive of ICIs. Methods: Patients with untreated ED‐SCLC who received first‐line therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2002 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the efficacy of first‐line chemotherapy according to the expression status of each immunohistochemical NE marker in patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI‐chemo group) and with chemotherapy alone (chemo group). Results: A total of 227 patients were included in the ICI‐chemo and chemo groups, respectively. The progression‐free survival (PFS) tended to be better in patients in the ICI‐chemo group than those treated with chemotherapy alone in patients with NE marker‐positive SCLC. In particular, it was statistically significant in patients with chromogranin A‐positive SCLC (p = 0.036). In patients with NE marker‐negative SCLC, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the two groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), regardless of the expression of any conventional NE marker. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the efficacy of ICIs in addition to chemotherapy may be poor in patients with NE marker‐negative SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second‐line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) sometimes preclude their use. Further, the safety and efficacy of AMR with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim (P‐PEG) have not been sufficiently evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMR with or without P‐PEG as second‐line chemotherapy for SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCLC who received AMR as second‐line chemotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center, between December 2014 and November 2021. Based on presence/absence of P‐PEG in their regimen, patients (n = 60) were divided into P‐PEG (n = 21) and non‐P‐PEG groups, and their clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Median of AMR treatment cycles was five (range: 1–39 cycles) in P‐PEG group and four (range: 1–15 cycles) in non‐P‐PEG group. The incidence of FN (4.8% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.02) and AMR dose reduction because of adverse events (4.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.08) were lower in the P‐PEG group than in the non‐P‐PEG group. The objective response rates were 52.4% and 30.8%, and median progression‐free and overall survival were 4.7 and 3.0 months, and 9.6 and 6.8 months, in the P‐PEG and non‐P‐PEG groups, respectively. Conclusions: AMR with P‐PEG as second‐line chemotherapy for SCLC reduced the incidence of FN at a maintained AMR dose intensity and was associated with favorable tumor responses and survival outcomes. P‐PEG should be considered for patients treated with AMR for SCLC including refractory relapsed SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (TROP2) is expressed on the surface of trophoblast cells and many malignant tumor cells. However, data on TROP2 expression in advanced lung cancer are insufficient, and its changes have not been fully evaluated. Methods: We assessed the prevalence and changes in TROP2 expression in patients with lung cancer who received anti-cancer treatments using immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis with an anti-TROP2 antibody (clone: SP295). IHC scores were graded from 0 to 3; grade ≥ 2 was considered positive for TROP2 expression. We defined a difference in IHC score, before and after anti-cancer treatments, as the change in TROP2 expression. Results: Before anti-cancer treatment, TROP2 expression was observed in 89% (143/160) of the patients and was significantly more common in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma than in neuroendocrine carcinoma (P < 0.001). After anti-cancer treatment, TROP2 expression was observed in 87% (139/160) of the patients. The distribution of TROP2 expression in post-treatment samples was analogous to that in pre-treatment samples when compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (P = 0.509). However, an increase in TROP2 expression was seen in 19 (12%), and a decrease in 20 (13%) patients. Patients treated with targeted therapy showed significantly higher changes in TROP2 expression (P = 0.019) and thoracic radiotherapy was more likely to increase TROP2 expression than chemotherapy alone. Conclusion: Although some anti-cancer treatments might alter the TROP2 expression, TROP2 was expressed in most lung cancer specimens before and after anti-cancer treatments. These results support the development of TROP2-directed therapy against advanced lung cancer in various treatment lines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Few clinical studies have been designed for elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study to evaluate the tolerability of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The eligibility criteria were: unresectable stage III NSCLC, performance status 0 or 1, and age ≥ 75 years. Eligible patients received 6 weeks of weekly carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy with a total dose of 64 Gy in 32 fractions. Carboplatin was fixed to an area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of 2 mg/mL/min, and the recommended dose of nab-paclitaxel was evaluated using a dose-escalation study (30 or 40 mg/m2). Tolerability at the recommended dose was evaluated in an expansion study. Nineteen patients were enrolled at four institutions, all of whom were eligible and assessable. The recommended nab-paclitaxel dose was set at 30 mg/m2 because two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity at 40 mg/m2. The treatment completion rate of the 17 patients analyzed at the recommended dose was 100% (80% confidence interval (CI), 83.8–100%). The overall response rate was 76.5%, and the median progression free survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 4.2–21.4 months). Common grade 3 and 4 toxicities included leukopenia (23.5%), neutropenia (17.6%), anemia (5.9%), and infection (5.9%). One treatment-related death due to pneumonitis was observed six months after the end of the study. In conclusion, carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy show good tolerability and exhibit promising efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC. This trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on March 11, 2019 (trial no. jRCTs042180077). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]