Search

Background: BBV152 (Covaxin™) is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mixed with an immune adjuvant. We aimed to compare immune responses after booster vaccination with heterologous BBV152 versus homologous mRNA vaccine., Methods: We conducted a randomized, participant-blinded, controlled trial. Fifty mRNA-vaccinated participants were enrolled and randomized to receive an mRNA booster (n = 26) or BBV152 (n = 24). Blood samples were collected pre-vaccination, and at Day 7, 28, 180 and 360 post-booster for analysis of humoral and cellular immune responses. Primary end point was the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titer at day 28., Results: Recruitment began in January 2022 and was terminated early due to the BBV152 group meeting pre-specified criteria for futility. At Day 28 post-boost, mean SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers were lower with BBV152 (2004 IU/mL; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1132-3548) vs mRNA (26,669 IU/mL; 95 % CI, 21,330-33,266; p < 0.0001), but comparable levels of spike-specific CD4 and cytotoxic T-cells were observed. Anti-spike antibody titers remained significantly different at Day 180: BBV152 4467 IU/mL (95 % CI, 1959-10,186) vs mRNA 20,749 IU/mL (95 % CI, 12,303-35,075; p = 0.0017). Levels of surrogate virus neutralizing antibodies against ancestral and Omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.2 were significantly higher among mRNA recipients at Day 180, including after adjusting for intercurrent infection. By Day 360, anti-spike antibody titers and neutralizing antibody levels against Omicron subvariants became similar between vaccine groups. By the end of the study, 16 in each arm (mRNA 64 % and BBV152 69.6 %) had breakthrough infections and time to COVID-19 infection between vaccine groups were similar (p = 0.63)., Conclusions: Wild-type SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody titer and surrogate virus neutralizing test levels against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron subvariants BA.1/BA.2/BA.5 were significantly higher at Day 28 and 180 in individuals who received booster vaccination with an mRNA vaccine compared with BBV152., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT05142319., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic spread rapidly throughout the world and caused millions of deaths globally. Several vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic and reduce the burden it placed on public health. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of different vaccine platforms in inducing potent antibody responses. Moreover, the seroconversion rate and common side effects of vaccine platforms were evaluated., Methods: This meta-analysis included clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines that met the eligibility criteria. Electronic databases (including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) and Google Scholar search engine were searched for eligible studies. Regarding the methodological heterogeneity between the included studies, we selected a random-effects model. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) was chosen as the effect size for this meta-analysis., Results: Of the 1838 records identified through screening and after removing duplicate records, the full texts of 1076 records were assessed for eligibility. After the full-text assessment, 56 records were eligible and included in the study. Overall, vaccinated participants had a 150.8-fold increased rate of anti-spike IgG titres compared with the placebo group (GMR = 150.8; 95% CI, 95.9-237.1; I 2  = 100%). Moreover, vaccinated participants had a 37.3-fold increased rate of neutralising antibody titres compared with the placebo group (GMR = 37.3; 95% CI, 28.5-48.7; I 2  = 99%). The mRNA platform showed a higher rate of anti-spike IgG (GMR = 1263.5; 95% CI, 431.1-3702.8; I 2  = 99%), while neutralising antibody titres were higher in the subunit platform (GMR = 53.4; 95% CI, 32.8-87.1; I 2  = 99%) than in other platforms. Different vaccine platforms showed different rates of both anti-spike IgG and neutralising antibody titres with interesting results. The seroconversion rate of anti-spike IgG and neutralising antibody titres was more than 98% in the vaccinated participants., Conclusion: Inactivated and subunit vaccines produced a high percentage of neutralising antibodies and had a low common adverse reaction rate compared to other platforms. In this regard, subunit and inactivated vaccines can still be used as the main vaccine platforms for effectively controlling infections with high transmission rates., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The study aimed to explore the influencing factors after 2 doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines (Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV) in the real world. We conducted a cross-sectional serological study involving 316 volunteers aged ≧ 18 years from 7 vaccination hospitals in the Yubei districts, Yuzhong districts, and Jiulongpo districts of Chongqing. Serum samples were obtained about 1 month after 2 dose vaccination, and Nabs were tested using the pseudovirus-based neutralizing assay. Chi-square or Fisher exact tests were used to analyze the seropositive rates, while the Kruskal-Wallis H or Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyze differences in Nabs level among stratified groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the influencing factors. The results showed that seropositive rates was 76.27% and the GMT was 26.13 (95% CI: 23.03-29.66) after 2 doses of COVID-19 inactivated vaccination. The risk of being seropositive in 18 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years were 12.808-fold, 8.041-fold, 7.818-fold, 6.275-fold, 1.429-fold compared with the people aged ≥ 70 years (P < .05), and the risk of being seropositive of intervals 15 to 21 and 22 to 28 days were 0.273-fold and 0.286-fold compared with >28 days (P < .05), respectively. In conclusion, age may be a risk factor for reduced antibody production, and longer vaccination intervals-may be a protective factor that increases antibody production. These findings contribute to informing future vaccination strategies., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: The essence of this scholarly work was to carefully outline the key factors intensifying the virulence and protracted contagion of COVID-19, particularly among individuals afflicted with hematologic malignancies (HM), in an epoch predominantly governed by the Omicron variant., Methods: Adults with HM diagnosed with COVID-19 from November 2022 to February 2023 were monitored in this retrospective study. Patient blood samples yielded biochemical data, and COVID-19 was confirmed through RNA or antigen testing. The factors affecting severity and infection duration were examined using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. For calculating the overall survival probabilities, the Kaplan-Meier product limit approach was employed., Results: In the examined cohort, 133 individuals diagnosed with HM and concomitantly infected with COVID-19 were scrutinized. Of the participants, 29.3% (39 patients) were classified as Severe/Critical, while the other 70.7% (94 patients) were categorized as Non-severe. A significant difference was observed in vaccination status: 61.7% of patients in the Non-severe group had received at least a two-dose vaccine regimen, whereas 61.5% of the Severe/Critical group had either minimal or only one dose of vaccination. The data analysis revealed that elevated C-reactive protein levels (≥ 100 mg/L) significantly raised the risk of severe/critical conditions in HM patients with COVID-19, as determined by advanced multivariate logistic regression. The odds ratio was 3.415 with a 95% confidence interval of 1.294-9.012 (p = 0.013). Patients who continued to have positive nucleic acid tests and ongoing symptoms beyond 30 days were categorized as having a persistent infection, whereas those who achieved infection control within this timeframe were categorized as having infection recovery. Of the HM cohort, 11 did not survive beyond 30 days after diagnosis. The results from a competing risk model revealed that increased interleukin-6 levels (HR: 2.626, 95% CI: 1.361-5.075; p = 0.004) was significantly associated with persistent infection. Conversely, receiving more than two vaccine doses (HR: 0.366, 95% CI: 0.158-0.846; p = 0.019), and having high IgG levels (≥ 1000 mg/dl) (HR: 0.364, 95% CI: 0.167-0.791; p = 0.011), were associated with infection recovery. There was a notable disparity in survival rates between patients with persistent infections and infection recovery, with those in the non-persistent group demonstrating superior survival outcomes (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In conclusion, the study determined that HM patients with COVID-19 and increased C-reactive protein levels had a higher likelihood of severe health outcomes. Persistent infection tended to be more prevalent in those with vaccine dosages (< 2 doses), lower IgG levels, and higher interleukin-6 levels., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The research was conducted in Jimma town, Oromiya Regional State, from October 2022 to June 2023, with the aim of assessing the immune response of polyvalent FMD (Foot and Mouth Disease) vaccine. The study involved 34 cattle in a longitudinal study, divided into two groups: 29 vaccinated and 5 unvaccinated. The vaccinated cattle received an inactivated polyvalent FMD virus vaccine produced by the National Veterinary Institute. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 14, 21, 35, 80, and 125 after vaccination and tested using Virus Neutralization Test and 3ABC ELISA. The results showed a significant increase in neutralizing antibodies against structural proteins in all vaccinated cattle on day 14 after vaccination for all three serotypes. (A/ETH/21/2000, p = 0.015; O/ETH/38/2005, p = 0.017; SAT2/ETH/64/2009, p = 0.007). On day, fourteen of post-vaccination vaccinated group showed immune response equal or above 1.5 log10 in a proportion of 69%, 73% and 94% for serotype A/ETH/21/2000, O/ETH/38/2005 and SAT2/ETH/64/2009 respectively. The status of raised antibody titer on day 125 post-vaccination showed decreasing by 14%, 18% and 4% for serotype A/ETH/21/2000, O/ETH/38/2005 and SAT2/ETH/64/2009 respectively. The DIVA test, or 3ABC ELISA, used to differentiate infected from vaccinated animals, revealed the absence of immune response to the Non-structural protein in the vaccinated cattle group. Conversely, the unvaccinated group showed no recorded antibody titer to both structural and non-structural proteins. In summary, the commercially available FMD vaccine, comprising serotype A, O, and SAT2, triggers an immune response to the structural protein rather than the non-structural protein after the initial administration. This outcome implies that FMD vaccines from the National Veterinary Institute align with the DIVA test. Nevertheless, additional efforts may be necessary to bolster the strength and duration of the vaccine-induced immune response., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: To evaluate the immunogenicity of the inactivated herpes-zoster vaccine HZ/su in patients at increased risk for VZV-reactivation, we analysed the quantity and quality of the vaccine-induced cellular and humoral immunity in patients on dialysis with uremic immunodeficiency., Methods: In this observational study, 29 patients and 39 immunocompetent controls underwent standard dual-dose vaccination. Blood samples were analysed before and two weeks after each vaccination, and after one year. Specific T-cells were characterized after stimulation with VZV-gE-peptides based on induction of cytokines and CTLA-4-expression using flow-cytometry. Antibodies were analysed using ELISA., Findings: Both groups showed an increase in VZV-gE-specific CD4 T-cell levels over time (p < 0.0001), although median levels reached after second vaccination were lower in patients (0.17% (IQR 0.21%)) than in controls (0.24% (IQR 0.3%), p = 0.042). VZV-gE specific CD8 T-cells were only poorly induced. CTLA-4 expression on VZV-gE-specific CD4 T-cells was strongest after second dose with no differences between the groups (p = 0.45). Multifunctional cells co-expressing IFNγ, IL-2, and TNF were higher in patients after first vaccination (p = 0.028). Median VZV-specific IgG-levels reached a maximum after second vaccination with significantly lower levels in patients (10796 (IQR 12482) IU/l) than in controls (16899 (IQR 14019) IU/l, p = 0.009). Despite similar CD4 T-cell levels after one year (p = 0.415), antibody levels remained significantly lower in patients (p = 0.0008)., Interpretation: VZV-gE vaccination induced specific antibodies and CD4 T-cells in both patients and controls, whereas CD8 T-cell-induction was poor. Quantitative and qualitative differences in immunity may indicate reduced duration of protection which may necessitate booster vaccinations in patients on dialysis., Funding: HOMFORexzellent (to D.S.)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.S. has received grant support from Astellas and Biotest to the organization Saarland University outside the submitted work, and honoraria for lectures from Biotest and Novartis, and for advisory boards from Moderna, Biotest, MSD and Takeda outside the submitted work. T.S. has received travel grant support from Biotest outside the submitted work. All other authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Older adults (aged ≥65 years) show increased susceptibility to severe disease with influenza virus infection, accounting for 70-85% of annual influenza-related fatalities in the USA. Stimulating mucosal antibodies and T cells might enhance the low vaccine effectiveness seen in older adults for currently licensed inactivated influenza vaccines, which induce mainly serum antibodies. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the intranasal H3N2 M2-deficient single-replication (M2SR) vaccine, alone or coadministered with a licensed inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent; hereafter referred to as Fluzone HD), in older adults., Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 1b trial, individuals aged 65-85 years who were considered healthy or with stable chronic conditions with no recent (<6 months) influenza vaccinations were recruited from five clinical trial sites in the USA and randomly assigned (3:3:3:1) using a permuted block design to receive the H3N2 M2SR vaccine and Fluzone HD, the H3N2 M2SR vaccine and placebo, Fluzone HD and placebo, or placebo alone. All participants received a single intranasal spray and a single intramuscular injection, whether active or placebo, to maintain masking. The primary outcome was to assess the safety of H3N2 M2SR, administered alone or with Fluzone HD, in the safety analysis set, which included all participants who were randomly assigned and received treatment. Serum and mucosal antibodies were assessed as a secondary endpoint, and cell-mediated immunity as an exploratory endpoint, in participants in the per-protocol population, which included individuals in the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05163847., Findings: Between June 14 and Sept 15, 2022, 305 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the H3N2 M2SR vaccine plus placebo (n=89), H3N2 M2SR vaccine plus Fluzone HD (n=94), Fluzone HD plus placebo (n=92), or placebo alone (n=30). All randomly assigned participants were included in the safety analysis set. The most frequently reported local symptoms up to day 8 in groups that received M2SR were rhinorrhoea (43% [38 of 89] in the H3N2 M2SR plus placebo group and 38% [36 of 94] in the H3N2 M2SR plus Fluzone HD group), nasal congestion (51% [45 of 89] and 35% [33 of 94]), and injection-site pain (8% [seven of 89] and 49% [46 of 94]), and the most frequently reported solicited systemic symptoms were sore throat (28% [25 of 89]) for M2SR and decreased activity (26% [24 of 94]) for the M2SR plus Fluzone HD group. In the Fluzone HD plus placebo group, the most frequently reported local symptom was injection-site pain (48% [44 of 92]) and systemic symptom was muscle aches (22% [20 of 92]). The frequency of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse event related to vaccination was low across all groups (2-5%). One serious adverse event was reported, in a participant in the Fluzone HD plus placebo group. M2SR with Fluzone HD induced seroconversion (≥four-fold increase in haemagglutination inhibition antibodies from baseline to day 29) in 44 (48%) of 91 participants, compared with 28 (31%) of 90 participants who seroconverted in the Fluzone HD plus placebo group (p=0·023). M2SR with Fluzone HD also induced mucosal and cellular immune responses., Interpretation: The H3N2 M2SR vaccine coadministered with Fluzone HD in older adults was well tolerated and provided enhanced immunogenicity compared with Fluzone HD administered alone, suggesting potential for improved efficacy of influenza vaccination in this age group. Additional studies are planned to assess efficacy., Funding: US Department of Defense., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JE is a consultant for FluGen. RB, HG, and KC serve on a clinical advisory board for FluGen. YK and GN are founders of FluGen. RH, DM, MJM, and PB are employees of FluGen. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Orally dissolving films (ODF) are designed to be dissolved on the tongue and absorbed in the mouth. It offers multiple advantages over the commonly used needle-based vaccines, especially in terms of convenience allowing safe, painless, and easy self-administration. As the efficacy of ODF-encapsulated influenza vaccines has not been demonstrated, we assessed the protection elicited by inactivated influenza virus (A/PR/8/34, H1N1) vaccine delivered using ODFs in mice. Trehalose and pullulan components of the ODF ensured that the HA antigens of the inactivated PR8 virus retained their stability while ensuring the rapid release of the vaccines upon exposure to murine saliva. Mice were immunized thrice by placing the PR8-ODF on the tongues of mice at 4-week intervals, and vaccine-induced protection was evaluated upon lethal homologous challenge infection. The PR8-ODF vaccination elicited virus-specific serum IgG and IgA antibody responses, hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI), and viral neutralization. Upon challenge infection, ODF vaccination showed higher levels of IgG and IgA antibody responses in the lungs and antibody-secreting cell (ASC) responses in both lung and spleen compared to unimmunized controls. These results corresponded with the enhanced T cell and germinal center B cell responses in the lungs and spleens. Importantly, ODF vaccination significantly reduced lung virus titers and inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-6) production compared to unvaccinated control. ODF vaccination ensured 100% survival and prevented weight loss in mice. These findings suggest that influenza vaccine delivery through ODFs could be a promising approach for oral vaccine development., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients are at an elevated risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this study was to assess antibody responses and safety profiles six months after the third dose of the inactivated acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in MASLD patients., Methods: This study included MASLD patients and healthy volunteers without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Blood samples were collected six months after receiving the third dose of the inactivated vaccine to measure the levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and anti-spike IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2., Results: A total of 335 participants (214 MASLD patients and 121 healthy volunteers) were enrolled. The seroprevalence of NAb was 61.7% (132 of 214) in MASLD patients and 74.4% (90 of 121) in healthy volunteers, which was a significant difference (p = 0.018). Statistically significant differences in IgG seroprevalence were also observed between MASLD patients and healthy volunteers (p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the severity of MASLD (OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.32-6.68; p = 0.009) and age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; p = 0.004) were independent risk factors for NAb negativity in MASLD patients. Moderate/severe MASLD patients had a lower NAb seroprevalence than mild MASLD patients (45.0% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.016)., Conclusion: Lower antibody responses were observed in MASLD patients six months after their third dose of the inactivated vaccine than in healthy volunteers, providing further assistance in monitoring patients who are more vulnerable to hypo-responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The inactivated COVID-19 vaccine has demonstrated high efficacy in the general population through extensive clinical and real-world studies. However, its effectiveness in immunocompromised individuals, particularly those living with HIV (PLWH), remains limited. In this study, 20 PLWH and 15 HIV-seronegative individuals were recruited to evaluate the immunogenicity of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in PLWH through a prospective cohort study. The median age of the 20 PLWH and 15 HIV-seronegative individuals was 42 years and 31 years, respectively. Of the PLWH, nine had been on ART for over five years. The median anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD IgG antibody level on d 224 was higher than that on d 42 (8188.7 ng/mL vs. 3200.9 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Following COVID-19 infection, the antibody level increased to 29,872.5 ng/mL on d re+90 , 12.19 times higher than that on d 300 . Compared with HIV-seronegative individuals, the antibody level in PLWH was lower on d 210 (183.3 ng/mL vs. 509.3 ng/mL, P < 0.01), while there was no difference after d 224 . The symptoms of COVID-19 infection in PLWH were comparable to those in HIV-seronegative individuals. In this study, the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated good immunogenicity in PLWH. The protective benefit of booster vaccinations for PLWH cannot be ignored. Implementing a booster vaccination policy for PLWH is an effective approach to providing better protection against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Human adenovirus type 55 (hAd55) infection can lead to acute respiratory diseases that often present with severe symptoms. Despite its persistent prevalence in military camps and communities, there are no commercially available vaccines or vaccine candidates undergoing clinical evaluation; therefore, there is an urgent need to address this. In this study, we evaluated the immunogenicity of inactivated hAd55 isolates and investigated the effects of adjuvants and various immunization intervals., Methods and Results: To select a vaccine candidate, four hAd55 strains (6-9, 6-15 (AFMRI 41014), 28-48 (AFMRI 41013), and 12-164 (AFMRI 41012)) were isolated from infected patients in military camps. Sequence analysis revealed no variation in the coding regions of structural proteins, including pentons, hexons, and fibers. Immunization with inactivated hAd55 isolates elicited robust hAd55-specific binding and neutralizing antibody responses in mice, with adjuvants, particularly alum hydroxide (AH), enhancing antibody titers. Co-immunization with AH also induced hAd14-specific neutralizing antibody responses but did not induce hAd11-specific neutralizing antibody responses. Notably, booster immunization administered at a four-week interval resulted in superior immune responses compared with shorter immunization intervals., Conclusions: Prime-boost immunization with the inactivated hAd55 isolate and an AH adjuvant shows promise as a potential approach for preventing hAd55-induced respiratory disease. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these vaccine candidates in preventing hAd55-associated respiratory illnesses., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Heterologous booster vaccines are more effective than homologous booster vaccines in combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. However, our understanding of homologous and heterologous booster vaccines for COVID-19 remains limited., Methods: We recruited 34 healthy participants from two cohorts who were primed with two-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine before, vaccinated with COVID-19 inactivated vaccine and adenovirus-vectored vaccine (intramuscular and aerosol inhalation of Ad5-nCoV) as a third booster dose. We assessed the immune responses of participants before and 14 days after vaccination, including levels of neutralizing antibodies, IgG, and cytokines, and quantified the transcriptional profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)., Results: The Ad5-nCoV group showed a significantly higher neutralizing antibody geometric mean titer (GMT) compared to the ICV group after 14 days of heterologous boosting. The intramuscular Ad5-nCoV group had a GMT of 191.8 (95% CI 129.0, 285.1) compared to 38.1 (95% CI 23.1, 62.8) in the ICV 1 group (p<0.0001). The aerosolized Ad5-nCoV group had a GMT of 738.4 (95% CI 250.9-2173.0) compared to 244.0 (95% CI 135.0, 441.2) in the ICV 2 group (p=0.0434). Participants in the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV group had median IFN-γ+ spot counts of 36.5 (IQR 15.3-58.8) per 10 6 PBMCs, whereas, both intramuscular Ad5-nCoV and CoronaVac immunization as the third dose showed lower responses. This suggests that a third dose of booster Ad5-nCoV vaccine (especially aerosolized inhalation) as a heterologous vaccine booster induces stronger humoral and cellular immune responses, which may be more potent against VOCs than the use of inactivated vaccine homologs. In transcriptomic analyses, both aerosolized inhalation/intramuscular injection of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine and inactivated vaccine induced a large number of differentially expressed genes that were significantly associated with several important innate immune pathways including inflammatory responses, regulation of the defense response, and regulation of cytokine production. In addition, we identified crucial molecular modules of protective immunity that are significantly correlated with vaccine type and neutralizing antibodies level., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that inhalation/intramuscular injection of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine-mediated stronger humoral and cellular immune responses compared with the inactivated vaccine, and correlated significantly with innate immune function modules, supporting a heterologous booster immunization strategy., Competing Interests: Author XZ, XL, and FW were employed by CanSino Biologics Inc. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zheng, Li, Zheng, Jiang, Li, Yao, Li, Wang, Liu, Cao, Qi, Chen, Jin, Zhu, Li and Chen.)

Background: Pregnancy is a critical time for women, making them more susceptible to infectious diseases like COVID-19. This study aims to determine the immunogenicity of COVID-19 in pregnant women who have been infected compared to those who have received the inactive COVID-19 vaccine., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, pregnant women who received the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm) and those with a history of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy were studied. Participants who had experienced stillbirth, received different COVID-19 vaccines, or had intrauterine fetal death were excluded from the study. Overall, the study included 140 participants. The participants were divided into two groups of 70 participants - pregnant women who received the Sinopharm vaccine and pregnant women who had COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Before delivery, blood samples were collected from all mothers to evaluate the maternal immunoglobulin G (IgG) level. Blood samples were also taken from the baby's umbilical cord during delivery to measure the newborn's IgG level. Additionally, blood samples were collected from babies whose mothers showed signs of acute infection to measure their IgM levels and evaluate vertical transmission., Findings: The study found a significant relationship between the mean level of maternal IgG and umbilical cord IgG within the groups (P < 0.001). The highest levels of maternal IgG (2.50 ± 2.17) and umbilical cord IgG (2.43 ± 2.09) were observed in pregnant women with a previous COVID-19 infection and no history of vaccination (P < 0.001). Only one baby was born with a positive IgM, and this baby was born to a mother who showed signs of COVID-19 infection in the last five days of pregnancy. The mother was 28 years old, with a BMI of 33; it was her first pregnancy, and she gave birth to a male newborn at term., Conclusion: Administering an inactivated vaccine during pregnancy can generate immunity in both the mother and the child. However, the vaccine's immunity level may not be as potent as that conferred by COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Nonetheless, the risk of vertical transmission of COVID-19 is considered minimal and can be classified as negligible., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Limited data exist on the factors affecting feline rabies vaccination outcomes during primary immunization. This study aimed to assess if specific factors (signalment, vaccination count, vaccine brand, and time since last vaccination) correlated with meeting global antibody titer standards and absolute titers in young cats given monovalent inactivated rabies vaccines. Analyzing a dataset from cats tested before their first annual booster using the FAVN test, logistic and linear regression models were applied. Among 379 cats, 94.2 % achieved titers meeting or exceeding the standard threshold (≥0.5 IU/ml). Time since last vaccination proved to be the primary predictor of vaccination success. Cats receiving two vaccinations tended toward higher titers. Age, sex, breed, and vaccine type showed no impact on outcomes. The present study indicates that vaccination failure in young cats is uncommon, and that the time interval from the latest vaccination is the single most important predictor of successful rabies vaccination., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All of the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in this study. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The costs related to the FAVN tests were covered by the pets’ owners and authors have no competing financial benefit., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The specific humoral immune response resulting from inactivated vaccination following by BA.5 infection, and predictors of XBB variants re-infection in BA.5 infection-recovered nasopharyngeal carcinoma (BA.5-RNPC) patients, were explored., Methods: Serum SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels were assessed using enzyme-linked-immunosorbent-assay. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with the magnitude of specific humoral immunity and susceptibility to re-infection by XBB variants., Results: Our data demonstrates that SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels were comparable between BA.5-RNPC patients and BA.5 infection-recovered-non-cancerous (BA.5-RNC) individuals. Specifically, serum levels of anti-ancestral-S1-IgG, anti-ancestral-nucleocapsid-protein (NP)-IgG, anti-BA.5-receptor binding domain (RBD)-IgG and anti-XBB.1.1.6-RBD-IgG were higher in BA.5-RNPC patients compared to those without a prior infection. Compared to BA.5-RNPC patients without vaccination, individuals who received inactivated vaccination exhibited significantly higher levels of anti-ancestral-S1-IgG and anti-XBB.1.16-RBD-IgG. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that inactivated vaccination was the most significant predictor of all tested SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies response. Subsequent analysis indicated that a low globulin level is an independent risk factor for XBB re-infection in BA.5-RNPC patients., Conclusions: The SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies have been improved in vaccinated BA.5-RNPC patients. However, the baseline immunity status biomarker IgG is an indicators of XBB variant re-infection risk in BA.5-RNPC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Tianxing Ji the behalf of all involved authors., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The appropriate COVID-19 booster vaccine following inactivated or adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccination is unclear., Objective: To investigate the immunogenicity of four COVID-19 booster vaccines., Methods: We prospectively enrolled healthy adults who received a two-dose CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 8-12 weeks earlier and allocated them to receive one of the following booster vaccine: inactivated (BBIBP-CorV), ChAdOx1 or mRNA (BNT162b2 at full [30 μg] and half [15 μg] dose) vaccines. We determined the reactogenicity and the humoral (anti-receptor binding domain IgG (anti-RBD-IgG), neutralizing antibodies (nAb) against Delta, Beta and Omicron variants) and cellular immunity measuring by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) responses post-booster. AR patients., Results: Among the 352 participants (179 CoronaVac and 173 ChAdOx1 participants), 285 (81%) were female, and median age was 39 (IQR: 31-47) years. Two weeks post-booster, both 30 μg- and 15 μg- BNT162b2 induced the highest anti-RBD IgG concentration (BAU/mL); Coronavac-prime: 30 μg-BNT162b2, 5152.2 (95%CI 4491.7-5909.8); 15 μg-BNT162b2, 3981.1 (3397.2-4665.4); ChAdOx1, 1358.0 (1141.8-1615.1); BBIBP-CorV, 154.6 (92.11-259.47); ChAdOx1-prime: 30 μg-BNT162b2, 2363.8 (2005.6-2786.1; 15 μg-BNT162b2, 1961.9 (1624.6-2369.1); ChAdOx1, 246.4 (199.6-304.2); BBIBP-CorV, 128.1 (93.5-175.4). Similarly, both 30 μg- and 15 μg- BNT162b2 boosting induced the highest nAb titers against Beta, Delta and Omicron BA.1 variants and highest T-cell response at 2 weeks after boosting. While all BNT162b2 or heterologous ChAdOx1-boosted participants had nAb against Omicron, these were < 50% for BBIBP-CorV and 75% for homologous ChAdOx1-boosted participants. There was significant decrease in nAb ( > 4-fold) at 16-20 weeks post booster for all groups., Conclusions: Heterologous boosting with BNT162b2 following CoronaVac or ChAdOx1 primary series is most immunogenic. Additional studies are needed to verify the clinical efficacy and persistence of immunity following half-dose BNT162b2.

Bovine Pestivirus typically involves one or more organ systems, with clinical manifestations ranging from mild to severe fatal systemic illness that lead to significant reproductive, productive, and economic losses. Vaccines face the challenge of addressing the significant variability of pestiviruses, which affects the interaction between viral antigens and the immune system's ability to provide protection. This study aimed to evaluate the serological responses against bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 (Pestivirus A) and Pestivirus B induced by 10 commercial vaccines, including one recombinant (vaccine E), two modified live (MLV multivalent, vaccine I, and MLV monovalent, vaccine J), and seven killed vaccines (KLV, vaccines A to H). Additionally, we evaluated the cross-reactivity between Pestivirus A and B from vaccines and HoBi-like pestivirus (Pestivirus H). In Phase 1, guinea pigs were used to screen for non-MLVs. They were divided into nine groups (n=6 each) and received two doses (⅕ of bovine dose) of eight different non-MLV on Days 0 and 21. Serum samples were collected on Days 0 and 30 for serological analyse. In Phase 2, Holstein × Gir heifers (n= 45) were divided into five groups, comprising 6-9 animals. They were vaccinated either once with MLVs or twice with the top non-MLVs screened in Phase 1. Serum samples were harvested on d0 (vaccination day) and d60 (60 days after the first dose) for MLV and non-MLV. Specific antibody titers were assessed virus neutralization (VN) and transformed in log2 for statistical analysis using PROC-MIXED. Significant effects were observed for vaccine groups, time points, and their interactions concerning neutralizing antibodies against Pestivirus A and B in both Guinea pigs and heifers. The Phase 1 study revealed serological responses against Pestivirus A exclusively in non-MLV D (85.33±13.49) and E (72.00±19.26). In the bovine study, the KLD vaccine D (72.00±15.10), recombinant vaccine E (90.66±25.85), and MLV I (170.66±28.22) resulted in an average of neutralizing antibodies against Pestivirus A that exceeded the protective threshold (≥ 60). However,individual analysis of heifers showed a higher frequency of animals presenting titers of Pestivirus A Ab surpassing 32 following vaccination with MLV I and J. None of the vaccine formulations in either study elicited a protective immune response against Pestivirus B or demonstrated cross-reactivity against Pestivirus H., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Epizootic haemorrhagic disease (EHD), caused by the EHD virus (EHDV), is a vector-borne viral disease transmitted through Culicoides biting midges. EHDV comprises seven serotypes (1, 2, and 4-8), with EHDV-8 having recently emerged and spread in Europe over the last two years. Such event has raised concerns about the significant threat posed by EHDV-8 to livestock industry. In this study, an inactivated vaccine against EHDV-8 (vEHDV8-IZSAM) was developed. Safety and efficacy of the vaccine were evaluated in calves through clinical, serological, and virological monitoring following experimental challenge. The vaccine was proven safe, with only transient fever and localized reactions observed in a few animals, consistent with adjuvanted vaccine side effects. vEHDV8-IZSAM elicited a robust humoral response, as evidenced by the presence of neutralizing antibodies. After challenge with a virulent isolate, viraemia and clinical signs were evidenced in control animals but in none of the vaccinated animals. This study highlights the potential of vEHDV8-IZSAM as a safe and highly effective vaccine against EHDV-8 in cattle. It offers protection from clinical disease and effectively prevents viraemia. With the recent spread of EHDV-8 in European livestock, the use of an inactivated vaccine could be key in protecting animals from clinical disease and thus to mitigate the economic impact of the disease. Further investigations are warranted to assess the duration of the induced immunity and the applicability of this vaccine in real-world settings. Accordingly, joint efforts between public veterinary institutions and pharmaceutical companies are recommended to scale up vaccine production., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the IZSAM., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Selecting appropriate adjuvants is crucial for developing an effective vaccine. However, studies on the immune responses triggered by different adjuvants in COVID-19 inactivated vaccines are scarce. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of Alum, CpG HP021, Alum combined with CpG HP021 (Alum/CpG), or MF-59 adjuvants with COVID-19 inactivated vaccines in K18-hACE2 mice, and compared the different immune responses between K18-hACE2 and BALB/c mice. In K18-hACE2 mice, the Alum/CpG group produced a 6.5-fold increase in anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG antibody titers compared to the Alum group, and generated a comparable level of antibodies even when the antigen amount was reduced by two-thirds, possibly due to the significant activation of germinal center (GC) structures in the central region of the spleen. Different adjuvants induced a variety of binding antibody isotypes. CpG HP021 and Alum/CpG were biased towards Th1/IgG2c, while Alum and MF-59 were biased toward Th2/IgG1. Cytokines IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α were significantly increased in the culture supernatants of splenocytes specifically stimulated in the Alum/CpG group. The antibody responses in BALB/c mice were similar to those in K18-hACE2 mice, but with lower levels of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Notably, the Alum/CpG-adjuvanted inactivated vaccine induced a higher number of T cells secreting IFN-γ and IL-2, increased the percentage of effector memory T (TEM) cells among CD8 + T cells, and effectively protected K18-hACE2 mice from Delta variant challenge. Our results showed that Alum/CpG complex adjuvant significantly enhanced the immune response to inactivated COVID-19 antigens and could induce a long-lasting immune response., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Jiangsu Taipurui Biotechnology Co., Ltd. holds the CpG HP021 patent authorship rights and licensed the patent to Zhejiang Toyouvax Bio-pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for commercial research and development. Zhejiang Toyouvax Bio-pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Taipurui Biotechnology Co., Ltd. provided materials and had nothing to do with the detection or manuscript writing. There are no conflicts of interest declared by any of the other writers., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Influenza is highly prevalent in children under five years, particularly those under two, accounting for 5-10% of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) in India. This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety of two tetravalent inactivated influenza vaccines in healthy children aged 6-35 months. The dose recommendation for this group increased from 0.25 mL to 0.5 mL to ensure adequate immune response, as per the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This Phase III, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study was conducted from May to October 2022 across five centers in India. A total of 346 subjects were randomized to receive two doses of either the test vaccine (Vaxiflu-4, Zydus Lifesciences Limited; n  = 174) or the reference vaccine (Fluarix Tetra, GlaxoSmithKline; n  = 172). The primary objective was to compare immunogenicity using seroprotection rate, seroconversion rate, and geometric mean titers (GMTs) against four vaccine strains. Safety profiles were also compared. Both vaccines demonstrated non-inferiority, with seroprotection rates over 95%, seroconversion rates above 90%, and significant GMT increases. Adverse events (AEs) were similar for both vaccines, including pain at the injection site, erythema, swelling, and pyrexia. The test vaccine, Vaxiflu-4, showed non-inferiority in terms of immunogenicity and safety when compared with reference vaccine, Fluarix Tetra (Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2022/05/042514).

Several COVID-19 vaccines were developed using different approaches to prevent both symptomatic COVID-19 cases and fatalities. The adults were vaccinated with two doses of AZD1222/Covishield ( n  = 77) [manufactured by Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd] vaccine and BV152/Covaxin ( n  = 99) [manufactured by Bharat Biotech] vaccine. They were assessed for immune response at pre-vaccination, 1 month post first and 6 months post second dose for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody, surrogate neutralizing antibody (NAbs), immune phenotypes, antigen specific NK, B and T cell response, their effector functionality by ELISPOT and plasma cytokine profile. Both vaccines elicited enhanced IgG antibody and Nab levels compared to the baseline. BV152/Covaxin, the whole virus inactivated vaccine exhibited higher IgG (70% vs 100%), Nab (90% vs 100%), and robust T cell (31% vs 96%) responses at 6 months post second dose compared to 1 month post first dose justifying the utility of the second dose. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 WV and S1 specific CD4+ central T cell memory response in AZD1222/Covishield vaccinee at 6 months post second dose and higher CD4+ and CD8+ naïve and central memory T cell response in BV152/Covaxin vaccinee at 1 month post first dose indicated the involvement of memory T cells. Persistent IgG and NAb responses along with IgG+B and IgG+memory B cells in AZD1222/Covishield recipients at 6 months post second dose indicated sustained immune memory response. Continued heightened IFN-γ secreting T cell response (ELISPOT) displayed by both the vaccine platforms could serve as a co correlate of protection, further to evaluation in follow up studies. Overall, our data suggest that coordinated functions of humoral and cellular branches of adaptive immunity may pave ways toward protective immunity against COVID-19.

Trial Registration Number: NCT04993365 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

To achieve global herd immunity, widespread vaccination is the most effective strategy. Vaccines stimulate the immune system, generating cytokines and chemokines, isotype antibodies, and neutralizing antibodies; all these molecules collectively provide a more comprehensive characterization of the immune response post-vaccination. We conducted a longitudinal study in northwestern Mexico, involving 120 individuals before vaccination and after the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and 46 individuals after their second dose. Our findings reveal that antibody levels stabilize over time; cytokine levels generally increase following the first dose but decrease after the second dose and higher than normal levels in IgG1 and IgG3 concentrations are present. Most of the innate cytokines determined in this study were higher after the first dose of the vaccine. Regardless of previous infection history, this finding suggests that the first dose of the vaccine is crucial and may stimulate immunity by enhancing the innate immune response. Conversely, increased levels of IL-4, indicative of a Th2 response, were found in individuals without prior exposure to the virus and in those vaccinated with CoronaVac. These results suggest that the immune response to COVID-19 vaccines is multi-faceted, with preexisting immunity potentiating a more robust innate response. Vaccine type plays a critical role, with genetic vaccines favoring a Th1 response and inactivated vaccines like CoronaVac skewing toward a Th2 profile.

The influenza viruses cause seasonal respiratory illness that affect millions of people globally every year. Prophylactic vaccines are the recommended method to prevent the breakout of influenza epidemics. One of the current commercial influenza vaccines consists of inactivated viruses that are selected months prior to the start of a new influenza season. In many seasons, the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of these vaccines can be relatively low. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an improved, more universal influenza vaccine (UIV) that can provide broad protection against various drifted strains in all age groups. To meet this need, the computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) methodology was developed to design a hemagglutinin (HA) molecule as a new influenza vaccine. In this study, COBRA HA-based inactivated influenza viruses (IIV) expressing the COBRA HA from H1 or H3 influenza viruses were developed and characterized for the elicitation of immediate and long-term protective immunity in both immunologically naïve or influenza pre-immune animal models. These results were compared to animals vaccinated with IIV vaccines expressing wild-type H1 or H3 HA proteins (WT-IIV). The COBRA-IIV elicited long-lasting broadly reactive antibodies that had hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) activity against drifted influenza variants.

Mucosal immunity plays a crucial role in combating and controlling the spread of highly mutated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recombinant subunit vaccines have shown safety and efficacy in clinical trials, but further investigation is necessary to evaluate their feasibility as mucosal vaccines. This study developed a SARS-CoV-2 mucosal vaccine using spike (S) proteins from a prototype strain and the omicron variant, along with a cationic chitosan adjuvant, and systematically evaluated its immunogenicity after both primary and booster immunization in mice. Primary immunization through intraperitoneal and intranasal administration of the S protein elicited cross-reactive antibodies against prototype strains, as well as delta and omicron variants, with particularly strong effects observed after mucosal vaccination. In the context of booster immunization following primary immunization with inactivated vaccines, the omicron-based S protein mucosal vaccine resulted in a broader and more robust neutralizing antibody response in both serum and respiratory mucosa compared to the prototype vaccine, enhancing protection against different variants. These findings indicate that mucosal vaccination with the S protein has the potential to trigger a broader and stronger antibody response during primary and booster immunization, making it a promising strategy against respiratory pathogens.

The immune response to inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) is influenced by multiple factors, including hemagglutinin content and egg-based manufacturing. Only two US-licensed vaccines are manufactured without egg passage: cell culture-based inactivated vaccine (ccIIV) and recombinant vaccine (RIV). We conducted a randomized open-label trial in central Wisconsin during the 2018-19 and 2019-20 seasons to compare immunogenicity of sequential vaccination. Participants 18-64 years old were randomized 1:1:1 to receive RIV, ccIIV or IIV in strata defined by number of influenza vaccine doses in the prior 3 years. They were revaccinated with the same product in year two. Paired serum samples were tested by hemagglutination inhibition against egg-adapted and cell-grown vaccine viruses. Serologic endpoints included geometric mean titer (GMT), mean fold rise, and percent seroconversion. There were 373 participants randomized and vaccinated in 2018-19; 332 were revaccinated in 2019-20. In 2018-19, RIV and ccIIV were not more immunogenic than IIV against A/H1N1. The post-vaccination GMT against the cell-grown 3C.2a A/H3N2 vaccine virus was higher for RIV vs IIV ( p  = .001) and RIV vs ccIIV ( p  = .001). The antibody response to influenza B viruses was similar across study arms. In 2019-20, GMT against the cell-grown 3C.3a A/H3N2 vaccine virus was higher for RIV vs IIV ( p  = .03) and for RIV vs ccIIV ( p  = .001). RIV revaccination generated significantly greater backboosting to the antigenically distinct 3C.2a A/H3N2 virus (2018-19 vaccine strain) compared to ccIIV or IIV. This study adds to the evidence that RIV elicits a superior immunologic response against A/H3N2 viruses compared to other licensed influenza vaccine products.

SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain-induced immune imprinting poses great challenges to updating vaccines for new variants. Studies showed that repeated Omicron exposures could override immune imprinting induced by inactivated vaccines but not mRNA vaccines, a disparity yet to be understood. Here, we analyzed the immune imprinting alleviation in inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) cohorts after a long-term period following breakthrough infections (BTI). We observed in CoronaVac-vaccinated individuals who experienced BA.5/BF.7 BTI, the proportion of Omicron-specific memory B cells (MBCs) substantially increased after an extended period post-Omicron BTI, with their antibodies displaying enhanced somatic hypermutation and neutralizing potency. Consequently, the neutralizing antibody epitope distribution encoded by MBCs post-BA.5/BF.7 BTI after prolonged maturation closely mirrors that in BA.5/BF.7-infected unvaccinated individuals. Together, these results indicate the activation and expansion of Omicron-specific naïve B cells generated by first-time Omicron exposure helped to alleviate CoronaVac-induced immune imprinting, and the absence of this process should have caused the persistent immune imprinting seen in mRNA vaccine recipients.

Continuous emergence of new variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), enhanced transmissibility, significant immune escape, and waning immunity call for booster vaccination. We evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of heterologous booster with a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine SYS6006 versus an active control vaccine in a randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase 3 trial in healthy adults aged 18 years or more who had received two or three doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine in China. The trial started in December 2022 and lasted for 6 months. The participants were randomized (overall ratio: 3:1) to receive one dose of SYS6006 ( N  = 2999) or an ancestral receptor binding region-based, alum-adjuvanted recombinant protein SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ( N  = 1000), including 520 participants in an immunogenicity subgroup. SYS6006 boosting showed good safety profiles with most AEs being grade 1 or 2, and induced robust wild-type and Omicron BA.5 neutralizing antibody response on Days 14 and 28, demonstrating immunogenicity superiority versus the control vaccine and meeting the primary objective. The relative vaccine efficacy against COVID-19 of any severity was 51.6% (95% CI, 35.5-63.7) for any variant, 66.8% (48.6-78.5) for BA.5, and 37.7% (2.4-60.3) for XBB, from Day 7 through Month 6. In the vaccinated and infected hybrid immune participants, the relative vaccine efficacy was 68.4% (31.1-85.5) against COVID-19 of any severity caused by a second infection. All COVID-19 cases were mild. SYS6006 heterologous boosting demonstrated good safety, superior immunogenicity and high efficacy against BA.5-associated COVID-19, and protected against XBB-associated COVID-19, particularly in the hybrid immune population. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200066941.

Background: Influenza vaccination may protect through the humoral immune response, cellular immune response, or possibly both. Immunity after vaccination can be mediated through antibodies that may be detected by the rise of serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titers. Our objective was to investigate the proportion of protection against influenza mediated through antibodies by measuring the rise of HAI titer (indirect effect) compared to that induced through other immune mechanisms (direct effect) for influenza A and B., Methods: We analysed data from a cluster randomized trial conducted during the 2008-2009 season in which Canadian Hutterite children were vaccinated against influenza. We used inverse probability weighting to calculate the indirect and direct effect of vaccination against influenza A/H3N2 and influenza B/Brisbane using HAI titres and overall vaccine efficacy., Results: We included data on 617 children from 46 Hutterite colonies, aged between 3 and 15 years who were vaccinated with either inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine or hepatitis A vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was 63 % for influenza A (H3N2) and 28 % for influenza B. The hazard ratio for protection against influenza A/H3N2 due to an indirect effect of vaccination was 0.96 (95 % confidence interval (CI) of 0.00 to 2.89) while for the direct effect it was 0.38 (95 % CI of 0.00 to 5.47). The hazard ratio for influenza B indirect effect was 0.75 (95 % CI of 0.07 to 1) and for the direct effect 0.96 (95 % CI of 0.00 to 12.02). In contrast, repeating the analysis using microneutralization in a subgroup of 488 children revealed that the protective effect for vaccination for A/H3N2 was entirely mediated by antibodies but only for 13 % for influenza B., Conclusions: Although vaccination provided higher protective effectiveness against influenza A than B, most of the influenza A vaccine efficacy likely occurred through antibodies other than what could be detected by HAI titres. In contrast, for influenza B, while the HAI titres appeared to mediate most of the vaccine effectiveness, this was not confirmed by microneutralization analysis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Loeb reports grant support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and WHO; receipt of an in-kind supply of vaccines from Sanofi; consulting fees for participation on advisory boards for Medicago, Novavax, Janssen, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, Sanofi, and Seqirus; and participation on a data and safety monitoring board for CanSino Biologics., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study was to assess the lot-to-lot consistency, immunogenicity and safety of three manufacturing lots of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4)., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, phase IV clinical trial was conducted in healthy children, adolescents and adults aged 9-59 years in Guizhou Province, China. Eligible participants were enrolled and randomized into three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive a single dose of one of three manufacturing lots of IIV4. Serum samples were collected before and 28 days after vaccination for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody testing. Safety data were collected for up to 28 days after vaccination. The primary objective was to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of immune response as assessed by the geometric mean titer (GMT) of HI antibody at 28 days after vaccination., Results: Between November 27, 2022 and December 18, 2022, 1260 eligible participants were enrolled, with similar participant demographics among groups. Immune responses after vaccination were comparable across groups, with the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of GMT ratios for all 4 strains falling into the equivalence criterion of (0.67, 1.5). The seroconversion rates (SCRs) and seroprotection rates (SPRs) met the US Center or Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for all strains for each lot (lower limit of 95% CI of SCR ≥ 40% and SPR ≥ 70%). The incidences of solicited and unsolicited adverse reactions were similar among three groups, most of which (91.9%) were mild or moderate in severity. A total of 11 serious adverse events were reported during the study, and all were considered unrelated to vaccination., Conclusion: The three manufacturing lots of IIV4 demonstrated consistent immunogenicity. IIV4 can elicit satisfactory immune responses for all four strains and no safety concerns were identified., Clinical Trial Registration: Identifier No. NCT05512494., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Yuwei Li, Danyu and Jieru Wang are employed by Sinovac Biotech Co., Ltd. Xinyi Yang, and Siliang Zhou are employed by Sinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Whole virion inactivated vaccine CoronaVac (C) and Spike (S) mRNA BNT162b2 (B) vaccines differ greatly in their ability to elicit neutralizing antibodies but have somewhat comparable effectiveness in protecting from severe COVID-19. We conducted further analyses for a randomized trial (Cobovax study, NCT05057169) of third dose homologous and heterologous booster vaccination, i.e. four interventions CC-C, CC-B, BB-C and BB-B. Here, we assess vaccine immunogenicity beyond neutralizing function, including S and non-S antibodies with Fc receptor (FcR) binding, antibody avidity and T cell specificity to 6 months post-vaccination. Ancestral and Omicron S-specific IgG and FcR binding are significantly higher by BNT162b2 booster than CoronaVac, regardless of first doses. Nucleocapsid (N) antibodies are only increased in homologous boosted CoronaVac participants (CC-C). CoronaVac primed participants have lower baseline S-specific CD4 + IFNγ + cells, but are significantly increased by either CoronaVac or BNT162b2 boosters. Priming vaccine content defined T cell peptide specificity preference, with S-specific T cells dominating B primed groups and non-S structural peptides contributing more in C primed groups, regardless of booster type. S-specific CD4 + T cell responses, N-specific antibodies, and antibody effector functions via Fc receptor binding may contribute to protection and compensate for less potent neutralizing responses in CoronaVac recipients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Various COVID-19 vaccine trials have shown that vaccines can successfully prevent symptomatic cases of COVID-19 and death. Head-to-head comparisons help to better understand the immune response characteristics of different COVID-19 vaccines in humans., Methods: We randomly selected 20 participants from each of five ongoing Phase II trials of COVID-19 vaccines. Here, SARS-CoV 2-specific immune responses to DNA vaccine (INO-4800), mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2), Adenovirus-vectored vaccine (CONVIDECIA), Protein subunit vaccine (Recombinant COVID- 19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells)), Inactivated Vaccine (KCONVAC) were examined longitudinally in healthy adults between Jan 15, 2021 and July 5, 2021 for 6 months. RBD-IgG titres were detected by ELISA, neutralising antibody titer were detected by pseudoviral neutralization and immune cell response were detected by flow cytometry., Results: At the first visit (V1), 100% of individuals who received the BNT162b2, CONVIDECIA, or KCONVAC vaccines experienced seroconversion of neutralizing and binding antibodies in the serum. Except for the Recombinant COVID-19 Vaccine (Sf9 Cells) vaccine having the highest neutralizing antibody GMT at the second visit (although there was no statistically significant difference in geometric mean titers between V1 and V2), the rest of the vaccines had the highest levels of binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies at V1. The neutralizing antibodies GMT of all vaccines showed a significant decrease at V3 compared to V1. The neutralizing antibody GMT against the omicron variant of all vaccines at V1 showed a significant decrease compared to the wild strain. We observed statistically significant differences in Tcm cells and RBD-specific memory B cells among various vaccines., Discussion: BNT162b2 (mRNA vaccine) exhibits the highest antibody levels among the five vaccines evaluated, regardless of whether the target is the wild-type virus or its variants. However, its cellular immune response may be weaker compared to CONVIDECIA (adenovirus type 5 vector vaccine)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Han, Pan, Jin, Wei, Jia, Wang, Chu, Gao, Zhou, Li and Zhu.)

Background: Concomitant administration of COVID-19, influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines could reduce the burden on healthcare systems. However, the immunogenicity and safety of various combinations of a third booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac), inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (IIV4), and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23), particularly in different age groups, is still unknown., Methods: A phase 4, randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted in Beijing, China. 636 healthy adults were divided into two age groups (18-59 and ≥60 years) and randomized equally into three groups: CoronaVac and IIV4 followed by PPV23; CoronaVac and PPV23 followed by IIV4; or CoronaVac followed by IIV4 and PPV23, with a 28-day interval between vaccinations. Immunogenicity was evaluated by measuring antibody titers, and safety was monitored. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298800., Results: Co-administration of a third dose of CoronaVac, IIV4, and PPV23 in any combination was safe. Among adults aged 18-59, co-administration with PPV23 maintained non-inferiority of antibody levels for CoronaVac and IIV4, despite a slight reduction in antibody responses. This reduction was not observed in participants ≥60 years. Furthermore, co-administration of IIV4 and PPV23 affected seroconversion rates for both vaccines., Conclusions: Co-administration of the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine with the influenza vaccine, followed by PPV23, may be optimal for adults aged 18-59. In adults ≥60, all vaccine combinations were immunogenic, suggesting a flexible vaccination approach. Since antibody measurements were taken 28 days post-vaccination, ongoing surveillance is essential to assess the longevity of the immune responses., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Bai, Zhou, Zhang, Chen, Lv, Wang, Zhang, Wu and Zhao.)

Background: The aim of the current study was to determine the safety and immunogenicity of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) alone or formulated with Advax delta inulin adjuvant in those who were older (aged >60 years) or had chronic disease., Methods: Over 4 consecutive years from 2008 through 2011, adult participants with chronic disease or >60 years of age were recruited into a randomized controlled study to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Advax-adjuvanted TIV (TIV + Adj) versus standard TIV. The per-protocol population with ≥1 postbaseline measurement of influenza antibodies comprised 1297 participants, 447 in the TIV and 850 in the TIV + Adj) group., Results: No safety issues were identified. Variables negatively affecting vaccine responses included obesity and diabetes mellitus. Advax adjuvant had a positive impact on anti-influenza immunoglobulin M responses and on H3N2 and B strain seropositivity as assessed by hemagglutination inhibition., Conclusions: TIV + Adj was safe and well tolerated in individuals with chronic disease. There is an ongoing need for research into improved influenza vaccines for high-risk populations., Clinical Trials Registration: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN 12608000364370., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Y. H. O. and N. P. are affiliated with Vaxine, which holds proprietary rights over Advax adjuvant. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aim: The study aimed to compare long-term vaccine-induced humoral immunity following different vaccines regimens., Methods: Anti-S-RBD total antibody levels were measured in blood samples of 167 participants nearly 6 months post-vaccination. Participants had received one; two or four doses of Pfizer vaccine or who received a third dose of mRNA vaccine (Pfizer) and primed with mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna), adenoviral (AstraZeneca/Jonson & Jonson) or inactivated (CoronaVac/Sinopharm) vaccine., Results: Among all vaccination regimens, fourth dose of Pfizer achieved the highest S-RBD antibody titers. Nevertheless, the third dose of mRNA vaccine primed with adenoviral vaccine achieved the lowest titers of S-RBD antibody. Notably, the group that received a third dose of mRNA primed with two doses of mRNA vaccine exhibited higher S-RBD antibody compared to groups inoculated with a third dose of mRNA and primed with inactivated or adenovirus vaccine., Conclusion: Our data showed the superiority of three mRNA vaccinations compared to third heterologous vaccine (inactivated of adenoviral) including mRNA as booster in terms of humoral immunogenicity. Our findings supporting the use of additional booster shot from a more potent vaccine type such as mRNA vaccines. Nevertheless, due to the limited number of subjects, it is difficult to extrapolate the results of our study to the whole of Tunisian population. Future studies should investigate a larger cohort and other potential correlates of protection, such as cellular immunity and how it is affected by different vaccination schemes after long-term post-vaccination.

Background: Data on the dynamics and persistence of humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 after primary vaccination with two-dose inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) are limited. This study evaluated the sequential effects of prior infection, heterologous boosting with mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and the occurrence of Omicron vaccine-breakthrough infection (VBI) thereafter., Methods: We evaluated anti-spike IgG (Abbott) and neutralising (cPASS/GenScript) antibody (nAb) titers up to one year after mRNA-1273 boost in two-dose-CoronaVac-primed Indonesian healthcare workers (August 2021-August 2022). We used linear mixed modeling to estimate the rate of change in antibody levels, and logistic regression to examine associations between antibody levels and VBI., Results: Of 138 participants, 52 (37.7%) had a prior infection and 78 (56.5%) received an mRNA-1273 booster. After two-dose CoronaVac, antibody titers had significantly declined within 180 days, irrespective of prior infection. After mRNA-1273 booster, anti-spike IgG (1.47% decline/day) and Omicron B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs declined between day 28-90, and IgG titers plateaued between day 90-360. During the BA.1/BA.2 wave (February-March 2022), 34.6% (27/78) of individuals experienced a VBI (median 181 days after mRNA-1273), although none developed severe illness. VBI was associated with low pre-VBI anti-spike IgG and B.1.1.529/BA.2 nAbs, which were restored post-VBI., Conclusions: mRNA-1273 booster after two-dose CoronaVac did not prevent BA.1/BA.2 VBI. Periodic vaccine boosters may be warranted against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The hemagglutination inhibition antibody (HAI) titer contributes only a part of vaccine-induced protection against influenza virus infections. Using causal mediation analysis, we quantified the proportion of vaccine efficacy mediated by postvaccination HAI titers., Methods: We conducted causal mediation analyses using data from a randomized, active-comparator controlled, phase III, trial of an inactivated, split-virion seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine in children conducted from October 2010 to December 2011 in 8 countries. Vaccine efficacy was estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model. Estimates were decomposed into the direct and indirect effects mediated by postvaccination HAI titers., Results: The proportions of vaccine efficacy mediated by postvaccination HAI titers were estimated to be 22% (95% confidence interval, 18%--47%) for influenza A(H1N1), 20% (16%-39%) for influenza A(H3N2), and 37% (26%-85%) for influenza B/Victoria., Conclusions: HAI titers partially mediate influenza vaccine efficacy against influenza A(H1N1), A(H3N2), and B/Victoria. Our estimates were lower than in previous studies, possibly reflecting expected heterogeneity in antigenic similarity between vaccine and circulating viruses across seasons., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interests. B. J. C. consults for AstraZeneca, Fosun Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Haleon, Moderna, Novavax, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi Pasteur. All other authors report no other potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Inactivated whole-virus vaccination elicits immune responses to both SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) and spike (S) proteins, like natural infections. A heterologous Ad26.COV2.S booster given at two different intervals after primary BBIBP-CorV vaccination was safe and immunogenic at days 28 and 84, with higher immune responses observed after the longer pre-boost interval. We describe booster-specific and hybrid immune responses over 1 year., Methods: This open-label phase 1/2 study was conducted in healthy Thai adults aged ≥ 18 years who had completed primary BBIBP-CorV primary vaccination between 90-240 (Arm A1; n = 361) or 45-75 days (Arm A2; n = 104) before enrolment. All received an Ad26.COV2.S booster. We measured anti-S and anti-N IgG antibodies by Elecsys®, neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization assay, and T-cell responses by quantitative interferon (IFN)-γ release assay. Immune responses were evaluated in the baseline-seronegative population (pre-booster anti-N < 1.4 U/mL; n = 241) that included the booster-effect subgroup (anti-N < 1.4 U/mL at each visit) and the hybrid-immunity subgroup (anti-N ≥ 1.4 U/mL and/or SARS-CoV-2 infection, irrespective of receiving non-study COVID-19 boosters)., Results: In Arm A1 of the booster-effect subgroup, anti-S GMCs were 131-fold higher than baseline at day 336; neutralizing responses against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 were 5-fold higher than baseline at day 168; 4-fold against Omicron BA.2 at day 84. IFN-γ remained approximately 4-fold higher than baseline at days 168 and 336 in 18-59-year-olds. Booster-specific responses trended lower in Arm A2. In the hybrid-immunity subgroup at day 336, anti-S GMCs in A1 were 517-fold higher than baseline; neutralizing responses against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron BA.2 were 28- and 31-fold higher, respectively, and IFN-γ was approximately 14-fold higher in 18-59-year-olds at day 336. Durable immune responses trended lower in ≥ 60-year-olds., Conclusion: A heterologous Ad26.COV2.S booster after primary BBIBP-CorV vaccination induced booster-specific immune responses detectable up to 1 year that were higher in participants with hybrid immunity., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT05109559., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: S.M., R.W., S.K., S.L., A.J., A.T., V.L., P.C., N.T., N.C. report no potential conflicts of interest. S.N. has received honoraria for lectures from GSK, Zuellig Pharma, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Abbot, Sanofi, Organon and Takeda and has participated in advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline and Takeda. J.K.L. and T.A.W. and received institutional funding from Mahidol University to support study conduct, and T.A.W. supported management of Data Safety Monitoring Board activities and meetings. J-L.E. has no competing interests to declare.. M.F.R. is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and holds restricted stock units in the company. C.L. is an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals. T.K.M. has received consulting fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. P.P. has received funding from Mahidol University and Johnson & Johnson for study support., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

We conducted a phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including healthy adults in Sui County, Henan Province, China. Ninety-six adults were randomly assigned to one of three groups (high-dose, medium-dose, and low-dose) at a 3:1 ratio to receive one vaccine dose or placebo. Adverse events up to 28 days after each dose and serious adverse events up to 6 months after all doses were reported. Geometric mean titers and seroconversion rates were measured for anti-rotavirus neutralizing antibodies using microneutralization tests. The rates of total adverse events in the placebo group, low-dose group, medium-dose group, and high-dose group were 29.17 % (12.62 %-51.09 %), 12.50 % (2.66 %-32.36 %), 50.00 % (29.12 %-70.88 %), and 41.67 % (22.11 %-63.36 %), respectively, with no significant difference in the experimental groups compared with the placebo group. The results of the neutralizing antibody assay showed that in the adult group, the neutralizing antibody geometric mean titer at 28 days after full immunization in the low-dose group was 583.01 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 447.12-760.20), that in the medium-dose group was 899.34 (95 % CI: 601.73-1344.14), and that in the high-dose group was 1055.24 (95 % CI: 876.28-1270.75). The GMT of serum-specific IgG at 28 days after full immunization in the low-dose group was 3444.26 (95 % CI: 2292.35-5175.02), that in the medium-dose group was 6888.55 (95 % CI: 4426.67-10719.6), and that in the high-dose group was 7511.99 (95 % CI: 3988.27-14149.0). The GMT of serum-specific IgA at 28 days after full immunization in the low-dose group was 2332.14 (95 % CI: 1538.82-3534.45), that in the medium-dose group was 4800.98 (95 % CI: 2986.64-7717.50), and that in the high-dose group was 3204.30 (95 % CI: 2175.66-4719.27). In terms of safety, adverse events were mainly Grades 1 and 2, indicating that the safety of the vaccine is within the acceptable range in the healthy adult population. Considering the GMT and positive transfer rate of neutralizing antibodies for the main immunogenicity endpoints in the experimental groups, it was initially observed that the high-dose group had higher levels of neutralizing antibodies than the medium- and low-dose groups in adults aged 18-49 years. This novel inactivated rotavirus vaccine was generally well-tolerated in adults, and the vaccine was immunogenic in adults (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04626856)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Rapidly waning immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) requires continued global access to affordable vaccines. Globally, inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been widely used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In this proof-of-concept study we adapted an original-D614G SARS-CoV-2 virus to Vero cell culture as a strategy to enhance inactivated vaccine manufacturing productivity. A passage 60 (P60) virus showed enhanced fitness and 50-fold increased virus yield in a bioreactor compared to the original-D614G virus. It further remained susceptible to neutralization by plasma from SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated and convalescent individuals, suggesting exposure of relevant epitopes. Monovalent inactivated P60 and bivalent inactivated P60/omicron BA.1 vaccines induced neutralizing responses against original-D614G and BA.1 viruses in mice and hamsters, demonstrating that the P60 virus is a suitable vaccine antigen. Antibodies further cross-neutralized delta and BA.5 viruses. Importantly, the inactivated P60 vaccine protected hamsters against disease upon challenge with original-D614G or BA.1 virus, with minimal lung pathology and lower virus loads in the upper and lower airways. Antigenicity of the P60 virus was thus retained compared to the original virus despite the acquisition of cell culture adaptive mutations. Consequently, cell culture adaptation may be a useful approach to increase yields in inactivated vaccine antigen production., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Yellow fever virus (YFV) is endemic in >40 countries and causes viscerotropic disease with up to 20%-60% mortality. Successful live-attenuated yellow fever (YF) vaccines were developed in the mid-1930s, but their use is restricted or formally contraindicated in vulnerable populations including infants, the elderly, and people with compromised immune systems. In these studies, we describe the development of a next-generation hydrogen peroxide-inactivated YF vaccine and determine immune correlates of protection based on log neutralizing index (LNI) and neutralizing titer-50% (NT 50 ) studies. In addition, we compare neutralizing antibody responses and protective efficacy of hydrogen peroxide-inactivated YF vaccine candidates to live-attenuated YFV-17D (YF-VAX) in a rhesus macaque model of viscerotropic YF. Our results indicate that an optimized, inactivated YF vaccine elicits protective antibody responses that prevent viral dissemination and lethal infection in rhesus macaques and may be a suitable alternative for vaccinating vulnerable populations who are not eligible to receive replicating live-attenuated YF vaccines., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), M.K.S., E.H., and I.J.A. have a financial interest in Najít Technologies, Inc., a company that may have a commercial interest in the results of this research and technology. This potential individual and institutional conflict of interest has been reviewed and managed by OHSU and Najít Technologies, Inc. M.S.D. is a consultant or member of a scientific advisory board for InBios, Ocugen, Vir Biotechnology, Topspin Therapeutics, and Moderna. The Diamond laboratory has received unrelated funding support in sponsored research agreements from Emergent BioSolutions, Moderna, and Vir Biotechnology. I.J.A. and E.A.P. are inventors on US patent no. 10,744,198 entitled “Inorganic polyatomic oxyanions for protecting against antigenic damage during pathogen inactivation for vaccine production” and US patent nos. 11,141,475 and 11,633,470 entitled “Inactivating pathogens and producing highly immunogenic inactivated vaccines using a dual oxidation process.” M.K.S. and E.H. are inventors on US patent nos. 8,124,397 and 8,716,000 entitled “Inactivating pathogens with oxidizing agents for vaccine production.” No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A Newcastle disease virus (NDV)-vectored vaccine expressing clade 2.3.4.4b H5 Hemagglutinin was developed and assessed for efficacy against H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in specific pathogen-free (SPF) chickens, broilers, and domestic ducks. In SPF chickens, the live recombinant NDV-vectored vaccine, rK148/22-H5, achieved complete survival against HPAI and NDV challenges and significantly reduced viral shedding. Notably, the live rK148/22-H5 vaccine conferred good clinical protection in broilers despite the presence of maternally derived antibodies. Good clinical protection was observed in domestic ducks, with decreased viral shedding. It demonstrated complete survival and reduced cloacal viral shedding when used as an inactivated vaccine from SPF chickens. The rK148/22-H5 vaccine is potentially a viable and supportive option for biosecurity measure, effectively protecting in chickens against the deadly clade 2.3.4.4b H5 HPAI and NDV infections. Furthermore, it aligns with the strategy of Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals (DIVA)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Antigenically divergent H7N9 viruses pose a potential threat to public health, with the poor immunogenicity of candidate H7N9 vaccines demonstrated in clinical trials underscoring the urgent need for more-effective H7N9 vaccines. In the present study, mice were immunized with various doses of a suspended-MDCK-cell-derived inactivated H7N9 vaccine, which was based on a low-pathogenic H7N9 virus, to assess cross-reactive immunity and cross-protection against antigenically divergent H7N9 viruses. We found that the CRX-527 adjuvant, a synthetic TLR4 agonist, significantly enhanced the humoral immune responses of the suspended-MDCK-cell-derived H7N9 vaccine, with significant antigen-sparing and immune-enhancing effects, including robust virus-specific IgG, hemagglutination-inhibiting (HI), neuraminidase-inhibiting (NI), and virus-neutralizing (VN) antibody responses, which are crucial for protection against influenza virus infection. Moreover, the CRX-527-adjuvanted H7N9 vaccine also elicited cross-protective immunity and cross-protection against a highly pathogenic H7N9 virus with a single vaccination. Notably, NI and VN antibodies might play an important role in cross-protection against lethal influenza virus infections. This study showed that a synthetic TLR4 agonist adjuvant has a potent immunopotentiating effect, which might be considered worth further development as a means of increasing vaccine effectiveness., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease whose pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated, and vaccination is the only effective method for protecting against rabies virus infection. Most inactivated vaccines are produced using Vero cells, which are African green monkey kidney cells, to achieve large-scale production. However, there is a potential carcinogenic risk due to nonhuman DNA contamination. Thus, replacing Vero cells with human diploid cells may be a safer strategy. In this study, we developed a novel 2BS cell-adapted rabies virus strain and analysed its sequence, virulence and immunogenicity to determine its application potential as a human diploid cell inactivated vaccine., Methods and Results: The 2BS cell-adapted rabies virus strain 2aG4-B40 was established by passage for 40 generations and selection of plaques in 2BS cells. RNA sequence analysis revealed that mutations in 2BS cell-adapted strains were not located at key sites that regulate the production of neutralizing antibodies or virulence in the aG strain (GQ412744.1). The gradual increase in virulence (remaining above 7.0 logLD50/ml from the 40th to 55th generation) and antigen further indicated that these mutations may increase the affinity of the adapted strains for human diploid cells. Identification tests revealed that the 2BS cell-adapted virus strain was neutralized by anti-rabies serum, with a neutralization index of 19,952. PrEP and PEP vaccination and the NIH test further indicated that the vaccine prepared with the 2aG4-B40 strain had high neutralizing antibody levels (2.24 to 46.67 IU/ml), immunogenicity (protection index 270) and potency (average 11.6 IU/ml)., Conclusions: In this study, a 2BS cell-adapted strain of the 2aG4 rabies virus was obtained by passage for 40 generations. The results of sequencing analysis and titre determination of the adapted strain showed that the mutations in the adaptive process are not located at key sequence regions of the virus, and these mutations may enhance the affinity of the adapted strain for human diploid cells. Moreover, vaccines made from the adapted strain 2aG4-B40 had high potency and immunogenicity and could be an ideal candidate rabies virus strain for inactivated vaccine preparation., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Specific prevention of a number of infectious diseases has been introduced into the vaccination schedule. The production of immunoprophylactic drugs, in order to establish standard properties, including safety and specific effectiveness, requires strict adherence to manufacturing regulations, and the reliability of the results obtained requires monitoring of these parameters. The specific effectiveness of vaccine preparations is standardized according to the indicators of stimulation of specific antibody response formed in the body of vaccinated model biological objects., Objective: Determination of the immune reactivity of white mice to vaccination with the QazVac vaccine to establish the possibility of using them as a biological model in assessing the immunogenicity of the vaccine instead of Syrian hamsters., Materials and Methods: The immune reactivity of model animals was assessed by the seroconversion rate, dynamics of antibody titers to the SARS-CoV-2 virus formed in the body after vaccination with the test vaccine. In the case of seropositivity of animals before administration of vaccine or placebo, the level of immune reactivity was calculated by the difference in antibody titers between control and vaccinated animals or by the difference in antibody titers before and after immunization. Specific antibodies were detected and their titer was determined using a neutralization reaction., Results: The research results showed that the tested biological models had approximately the same immune reactivity to the administration of the QazVac vaccine, confirmed by the level and dynamics of antibody titers. When analyzing the fold increase in antibody titers in comparison to those of control animals, Syrian hamsters were more reactive compared to mice. But SPF white mice were standardized in their lack of the immune reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 virus before the immunization., Conclusion: The data obtained indicate that the immune reactivity of white mice to the administration of the QazVac vaccine in terms of the rate and dynamics of the formation of virus-neutralizing antibodies is approximately equivalent to the immune reactivity of Syrian hamsters. Before immunization with the vaccine, SPF white mice, in contrast to Syrian hamsters, do not have humoral immunity specific to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The immune reactivity equivalent to that observed of Syrian hamsters and the absence of antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 virus at a baseline indicate the superiority of the use of white mice in assessing the immunogenicity of vaccines against COVID-19 and/or obtaining specific factors of humoral immunity.

Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), a novel enteropathogenic coronavirus, causes diarrhea mainly in suckling piglets and has the potential to infect humans. Whereas, there is no commercially available vaccine which can effectively prevent this disease. In this study, to ascertain the duration of immune protection of inactivated PDCoV vaccine, suckling piglets were injected subcutaneously with inactivated PDCoV vaccine using a prime/boost strategy at 3 and 17-day-old. Neutralizing antibody assay showed that the level of the inactivated PDCoV group was still ≥1:64 at three months after prime vaccination. The three-month-old pigs were orally challenged with PDCoV strain CZ2020. Two pigs in challenge control group showed mild to severe diarrhea at 10-11 day-post-challenge (DPC), while the inactivated PDCoV group had no diarrhea. High levels of viral shedding, substantial intestinal villus atrophy, and positive straining of viral antigens in ileum were detected in challenge control group, while the pigs in inactivated PDCoV group exhibited significantly reduced viral load, minor intestinal villi damage and negative straining of viral antigens. These results demonstrated that PDCoV was pathogenic against three-month-old pigs and inactivated PDCoV vaccine can provide effective protection in pigs lasting for three months., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Participants between the ages of 10-86 years old were vaccinated with split-inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluzone®) in six consecutive influenza seasons from 2016-2017 to 2021-2022. Vaccine effectiveness varies from season to season as a result of both host immune responses as well as evolutionary changes in the influenza virus surface glycoproteins that provide challenges to vaccine manufacturers to produce more effective annual vaccines. Next generation influenza vaccines are in development and may provide protective immune responses against a broader number of influenza viruses and reduce the need for annual vaccination. An improved understanding how current influenza vaccines are influenced by human host immune responses in people of different ages and co-morbidities is necessary for designing the next-generation of 'universal' or broadly-protective influenza vaccines. Overall, pre-existing immune responses to previous influenza virus exposures, either by past infections or vaccinations, is a critical factor influencing host responses to seasonal influenza vaccination. Participants vaccinated in consecutive seasons had reduced serum hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) activity against strains included in the vaccine compared to participants that had not been vaccinated in the preceding 1-2 years prior to entering this study. The magnitude and breadth of these antibody responses were also modulated by the age of the participant. Elderly participants over 65 years of age, in general, had lower pre-existing HAI titers each season prior to vaccination with lower post-vaccination titers compared to children or young adults under the age of 35. The administration of higher doses (HD) of the split-inactivated vaccine enhanced the antibody titers in the elderly. This report showcases 6 consecutive years of antibody HAI activity in human subjects receiving seasonal split-inactivated influenza vaccine., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Carlock et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Heterologous prime-boost has broken the protective immune response bottleneck of the COVID-19 vaccines. however, the underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Here, we investigated antibody responses and explored the response of germinal center (GC) to priming with inactivated vaccines and boosting with heterologous adenoviral-vectored vaccines or homologous inactivated vaccines in mice. Antibody responses were dramatically enhanced by both boosting regimens. Heterologous immunization induced more robust GC activation, characterized by increased Tfh cell populations and enhanced helper function. Additionally, increased B-cell activation and antibody production were observed in a heterologous regimen. Libra-seq was used to compare the differences of S1-, S2- and NTD-specific B cells between homologous and heterologous vaccination, respectively. S2-specific CD19+ B cells presented increased somatic hypermutations (SHMs), which were mainly enriched in plasma cells. Moreover, a heterologous booster dose promoted the clonal expansion of B cells specific to S2 and NTD regions. In conclusion, the functional role of Tfh and B cells following SARS-CoV-2 heterologous vaccination may be important for modulating antibody responses. These findings provide new insights for the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that induce more robust antibody response., Competing Interests: Authors YS and ZY were employed by the company Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co. Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Song, Wang, Yang, He, Bao, Xie, Sun, Li, Quan, Yang and Li.)

Background: Novel coronaviruses constitute a significant health threat, prompting the adoption of vaccination as the primary preventive measure. However, current evaluations of immune response and vaccine efficacy are deemed inadequate., Objectives: The study sought to explore the evolving dynamics of immune response at various vaccination time points and during breakthrough infections. It aimed to elucidate the synergistic effects of epidemiological factors, humoral immunity, and cellular immunity. Additionally, regression curves were used to determine the correlation between the protective efficacy of the vaccine and the stimulated immune response., Methods: Employing LASSO for high-dimensional data analysis, the study utilised four machine learning algorithms-logistical regression, random forest, LGBM classifier, and AdaBoost classifier-to comprehensively assess the immune response following booster vaccination., Results: Neutralising antibody levels exhibited a rapid surge post-booster, escalating to 102.38 AU/mL at one week and peaking at 298.02 AU/mL at two weeks. Influential factors such as sex, age, disease history, and smoking status significantly impacted post-booster antibody levels. The study further constructed regression curves for neutralising antibodies, non-switched memory B cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD8 + T cells using LASSO combined with the random forest algorithm., Conclusion: The establishment of an artificial intelligence evaluation system emerges as pivotal for predicting breakthrough infection prognosis after the COVID-19 booster vaccination. This research underscores the intricate interplay between various components of immunity and external factors, elucidating key insights to enhance vaccine effectiveness. 3D modelling discerned distinctive interactions between humoral and cellular immunity within prognostic groups (Class 0-2). This underscores the critical role of the synergistic effect of humoral immunity, cellular immunity, and epidemiological factors in determining the protective efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines post-booster administration., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Introduction: A surge of human influenza A(H7N9) cases began in 2016 in China from an antigenically distinct lineage. Data are needed about the safety and immunogenicity of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) and the effects of AS03 adjuvant, prime-boost interval, and priming effects of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) IIVs., Methods: Healthy adults (n = 180), ages 19-50 years, were enrolled into this partially blinded, randomized, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 vaccination groups evaluating homologous versus heterologous prime-boost strategies with 2 different boost intervals (21 vs 120 days) and 2 dosages (3.75 or 15 μg of hemagglutinin) administered with or without AS03 adjuvant. Reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity measured by hemagglutination inhibition and neutralizing antibody titers were assessed., Results: Two doses of A(H7N9) IIV were well tolerated, and no safety issues were identified. Although most participants had injection site and systemic reactogenicity, these symptoms were mostly mild to moderate in severity; injection site reactogenicity was greater in vaccination groups receiving adjuvant. Immune responses were greater after an adjuvanted second dose, and with a longer interval between prime and boost. The highest hemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titer (95% confidence interval) observed against the 2017 A(H7N9) strain was 133.4 (83.6-212.6) among participants who received homologous, adjuvanted 3.75 µg + AS03/2017 doses with delayed boost interval., Conclusions: Administering AS03 adjuvant with the second H7N9 IIV dose and extending the boost interval to 4 months resulted in higher peak antibody responses. These observations can broadly inform strategic approaches for pandemic preparedness. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03589807., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . E. J. A. has consulted for Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, GSK, Janssen, Moderna, and Medscape, and his institution has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from MedImmune, Regeneron, PaxVax, Pfizer, GSK, Merck, Sanofi-Pasteur, Janssen, and Micron. He has served on a safety monitoring board for Kentucky BioProcessing, Inc. and Sanofi Pasteur. He has served on a data adjudication board for WCG and ACI Clinical. His institution has also received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. He is currently employed by Moderna, Inc. N. R. has consulted for EMMES, Moderna, GSK, Sanofi, Seqirus, and ICON, and her institution receives funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from Pfizer, Sanofi, Quidel, Lilly, Immorna, Vaccine Company, and Merck as well as NIH to conduct translational clinical studies and interventional clinical trials. P. W. has consulted for EMMES and Pfizer and her institution has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from Pfizer, Glaxo Smith Kline, Sanofi-Pasteur, and Gilead as well as NIH. C. A. R.'s institution has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BioFire Inc, GSK, MedImmune, Janssen, Merck, Moderna, Novavax, PaxVax, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Pasteur. She is co-inventor of patented respiratory syncytial virus vaccine technology, which has been licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc. C. M. K.'s institution has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from the CDC, Pfizer, Merck, and the NIH to conduct clinical trials of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. V. R. is currently employed by Pfizer, Inc., and works in vaccine clinical research unrelated to the current manuscript. This material reflects the personal views of the author and may not reflect the views of her current employer. M. J. M. reported these potential competing interests: laboratory research and clinical trials contracts for vaccines or MAB with Lilly, Pfizer, and Sanofi; contract funding from USG/HHS/BARDA for research specimen characterization and repository; research grant funding from USG/HHS/NIH for vaccine and MAB clinical trials; personal fees for Scientific Advisory Board service from Merck, Meissa Vaccines, Inc., and Pfizer. EBW has received funding support from Pfizer, Moderna, Sequiris, Najit Technologies Inc, and Clinetic for the conduct of clinical trials and clinical research. E. B. W. has served as an advisor to Vaxcyte and consultant to ILiAD biotechnologies. A. C. S.'s institution has received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from NIH, HIV Vaccine Trials Network, COVID Vaccine Prevention Network, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, Crucell/Janssen, Moderna, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Pasteur. S. K.'s institution has received funds to conduct clinical research and vaccine trials unrelated to this manuscript from the CDC, Pfizer, Meissa, Emergent BioSolutions, and the NIH. I. Y. reported being a member of the NIAID/COVPN mRNA-1273 Study Group and her institution received funding to conduct clinical research from NIH, Gates Foundation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pfizer, and Moderna outside the submitted work. She has consulted for Merck, Sanofi-Pasteur, and UptoDate. S. E. F. has received funding to conduct research from Novartis, Moderna, Janssen, Pfizer, and Bavarian Nordic and is a member of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network safety monitoring board. G. A. has received funding to conduct research from Bavarian Nordic. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)