Search

Background: Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans infection that damages the skin and subcutis. It is most prevalent in western and central Africa and Australia. Standard antimicrobial treatment with oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus intramuscular streptomycin 15 mg/kg once daily for 8 weeks (RS8) is highly effective, but streptomycin injections are painful and potentially harmful. We aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fully oral rifampicin 10 mg/kg plus clarithromycin 15 mg/kg extended release once daily for 8 weeks (RC8) with that of RS8 for treatment of early Buruli ulcer lesions.Methods: We did an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised (1:1 with blocks of six), multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial comparing fully oral RC8 with RS8 in patients with early, limited Buruli ulcer lesions. There were four trial sites in hospitals in Ghana (Agogo, Tepa, Nkawie, Dunkwa) and one in Benin (Pobè). Participants were included if they were aged 5 years or older and had typical Buruli ulcer with no more than one lesion (caterories I and II) no larger than 10 cm in diameter. The trial was open label, and neither the investigators who took measurements of the lesions nor the attending doctors were masked to treatment assignment. The primary clinical endpoint was lesion healing (ie, full epithelialisation or stable scar) without recurrence at 52 weeks after start of antimicrobial therapy. The primary endpoint and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect inferiority of RC8 by a margin of 12%. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01659437.Findings: Between Jan 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2017, participants were recruited to the trial. We stopped recruitment after 310 participants. Median age of participants was 14 years (IQR 10-29) and 153 (52%) were female. 297 patients had PCR-confirmed Buruli ulcer; 151 (51%) were assigned to RS8 treatment, and 146 (49%) received oral RC8 treatment. In the RS8 group, lesions healed in 144 (95%, 95% CI 91 to 98) of 151 patients, whereas lesions healed in 140 (96%, 91 to 99) of 146 patients in the RC8 group. The difference in proportion, -0·5% (-5·2 to 4·2), was not significantly greater than zero (p=0·59), showing that RC8 treatment is non-inferior to RS8 treatment for lesion healing at 52 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 20 (13%) patients receiving RS8 and in nine (7%) patients receiving RC8. Most adverse events were grade 1-2, but one (1%) patient receiving RS8 developed serious ototoxicity and ended treatment after 6 weeks. No patients needed surgical resection. Four patients (two in each study group) had skin grafts.Interpretation: Fully oral RC8 regimen was non-inferior to RS8 for treatment of early, limited Buruli ulcer and was associated with fewer adverse events. Therefore, we propose that fully oral RC8 should be the preferred therapy for early, limited lesions of Buruli ulcer.Funding: WHO with additional support from MAP International, American Leprosy Missions, Fondation Raoul Follereau France, Buruli ulcer Groningen Foundation, Sanofi-Pasteur, and BuruliVac. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of an 8-year-old student from the ulcer-endemic community in Ghana, with a month's history of painless nodule on the anterior chest and was taken to the Agogo Presbyterian Hospital. The patient underwent a medical examination wherein it revealed an extensive oedematous lesion involving the chest and neck regions. The article also discusses the use for combination of antibiotic therapy for patients with buruli ulcers.

Background: Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer (BU), is unique among human pathogens in its capacity to produce a polyketide-derived macrolide called mycolactone, making this molecule an attractive candidate target for diagnosis and disease monitoring. Whether mycolactone diffuses from ulcerated lesions in clinically accessible samples and is modulated by antibiotic therapy remained to be established. Methodology/Principal Finding: Peripheral blood and ulcer exudates were sampled from patients at various stages of antibiotic therapy in Ghana and Ivory Coast. Total lipids were extracted from serum, white cell pellets and ulcer exudates with organic solvents. The presence of mycolactone in these extracts was then analyzed by a recently published, fieldfriendly method using thin layer chromatography and fluorescence detection. This approach did not allow us to detect mycolactone accurately, because of a high background due to co-extracted human lipids. We thus used a previously established approach based on high performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. By this means, we could identify structurally intact mycolactone in ulcer exudates and serum of patients, and evaluate the impact of antibiotic treatment on the concentration of mycolactone. Conclusions/Significance: Our study provides the proof of concept that assays based on mycolactone detection in serum and ulcer exudates can form the basis of BU diagnostic tests. However, the identification of mycolactone required a technology that is not compatible with field conditions and point-of-care assays for mycolactone detection remain to be worked out. Notably, we found mycolactone in ulcer exudates harvested at the end of antibiotic therapy, suggesting that the toxin is eliminated by BU patients at a slow rate. Our results also indicated that mycolactone titres in the serum may reflect a positive response to antibiotics, a possibility that it will be interesting to examine further through longitudinal studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The global prevalence of intestinal extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-PE) is approximately 17% in communities, with significant variations among regions. This longitudinal study aimed to assess the impact of antibiotic intake on the incidence of intestinal ESBL-PE in Ghanaian pharmacy customers outside of hospitals. Screening for ESBL-PE was performed in four independent pharmacies in Kumasi, Ghana, using rectal swabs and an ESBL-PE–selective medium. Pharmacy customers purchasing antibiotics were recruited, and those buying non-antibiotic drugs served as controls. Participants who were negative for ESBL-PE provided follow-up swabs for up to 28 days. At baseline, 302 (75%) of 404 participants were colonized with ESBL-PE. Sixty-three participants who were negative for ESBL-PE at baseline received per-protocol follow-up, including 28 individuals who took antibiotics and 35 controls. The cumulative proportions of ESBL-PE in the antibiotics and control groups were 71% (20/28) and 54% (19/35) at the first follow-up (p 0.258), 86% (24/28) and 80% (28/35) at the second follow-up (p 0.741) and 86% (24/28) and 94% (33/35) at the third follow-up (p 0.393), respectively. The rate of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage among pharmacy customers outside of hospitals was higher than expected at baseline and further increased during the 28 days of follow-up, irrespective of antibiotic intake. This alarming finding needs to be considered in the antibiotic treatment of outpatients and emphasizes the urgent need for improved prevention strategies, development of new antibiotic drugs and potential future elimination strategies. Further longitudinal studies on ESBL-PE in African communities, also outside of pharmacy settings, are required. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]