Search

Background: Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs) more commonly occur in children with comorbidities and are increasingly associated with antimicrobial resistance. There are few large studies of GNBSIs in children that relate the clinical presentation, pathogen characteristics, and outcomes., Methods: A 3-year prospective study of GNBSIs in children aged <18 years was conducted in 5 Australian children's hospitals between 2019 and 2021. The clinical characteristics, disease severity, and outcomes were recorded. Causative pathogens underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing and whole genome sequencing., Results: There were 931 GNBSI episodes involving 818 children. Median age was 3 years (interquartile range, 0.6-8.5). A total of 576/931 episodes (62%) were community onset, though 661/931 (71%) occurred in children with comorbidities and a central venous catheter was present in 558/931 (60%). Central venous catheter (145/931) and urinary tract (149/931) were the most common sources (16% each). One hundred of 931 (11%) children required intensive care unit admission and a further 11% (105/931) developed GNBSIs in intensive care unit. A total of 659/927 (71%) isolates were Enterobacterales, of which 22% (138/630) were third-generation cephalosporin resistant (3GCR). Extended spectrum beta-lactamase genes were confirmed in 65/138 (47%) 3GCR Enterobacterales. Most common extended spectrum beta-lactamase genes were blaCTX-M-15 (34/94, 36%) and blaSHV-12 (10/94, 11%). There were 48 deaths overall and 30-day in-hospital mortality was 3% (32/931). Infections with 3GCR Enterobacterales were independently associated with higher mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.4)., Conclusions: GNBSIs in children are frequently healthcare associated and affect children younger than age 5 years. Infections with 3GCR Enterobacterales were associated with worse outcomes. These findings will inform optimal management guidelines and help prioritize future antimicrobial clinical trials., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . D. L. P. reports research grants from Shionogi, Pfizer, Merck, bioMérieux, BioVersys, Gilead, and consultancies with AMR Action Fund, CARB-X, Innoviva, Pfizer, Merck, bioMérieux, Cepheid, Aurobac, Arrepath, Spero, Shionogi. P. N. A. H. reports research grants from Gilead, has served on advisory boards for OpGen, Merck, and Sandoz, and has received honoraria from OpGen, Sandoz, Pfizer, and BioMérieux. S. C. H. W. has received honoraria for participation in MSD expert forum for pneumococcal disease, which was paid to Children's Health Queensland. U. W. received travel and accommodation support for meeting attendances by Pfizer and Moderna. A. D. I. has received honoraria for lectures from BioMérieux and Gilead that were paid to the University of Queensland. L. J. S. is a recipient of grants from Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN), NHMRC, NIH, NOMIS Foundation, Doris and Thomas Ammann Foundation. L. J. S. is also on the advisory board for the Lancet Child Adolescent Health Journal. HC receives grants from NIH and NIAID and payment from Merck for participation in Molnupiravir clinical trial. H. C. receives payment as senior editor for Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy and holds stocks in Moderna and Merck. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

We describe the demographics, clinical and molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSI) in Central Australia. All ESBL-producing E. coli bloodstream isolates from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively identified. Demographic and clinical information was extracted by chart review. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for multi-locus sequence typing, antibiotic-resistance genes, and phylogenetic relationships. We identified 41 non-duplicate episodes of ESBL E. coli BSI. Median age was 55 years (IQR 47-63), 78% were female, 93% were Aboriginal, and half came from a remote community. Infections were predominantly urinary (68%, 28/41). In the 12 months prior, 70% (26/37) of identified patients had been hospitalised and 81% (30/37) prescribed antibiotics. Meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam susceptibility was maintained in 100% and 95% of isolates, respectively. Co-resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics was 32% to gentamicin, 61% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 68% to ciprofloxacin. For sequenced isolates, 41% (16/35) were sequence type 131 (ST131). Mean acquired antibiotic-resistance genes for each isolate was 12.3 (SD 3.1). Four isolates carried an OXA-1 gene. Only non-ST131 isolates carried AmpC and acquired quinolone-resistance genes. There was some evidence of clustering of closely related strains, but no evidence of community or healthcare admission overlap. ESBL rates are rapidly rising in Central Australia, which is a conducive environment for antibiotic resistance development (e.g., overcrowding, socioeconomic disadvantages, high healthcare exposure and high antibiotic use). Future research is required to explore resistance-transmission dynamics in this unique setting., (Copyright © 2024 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Clinical trials of treatments for serious infections commonly use the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality. However, many trial participants survive their infection and this endpoint may not truly reflect important benefits and risks of therapy. The win ratio uses a hierarchical composite endpoint that can incorporate and prioritize outcome measures by relative clinical importance., Methods: The win ratio methodology was applied post hoc to outcomes observed in the MERINO trial, which compared piperacillin-tazobactam with meropenem. We quantified the win ratio with a primary hierarchical composite endpoint, including all-cause mortality, microbiological relapse, and secondary infection. A win ratio of 1 would correspond to no difference between the 2 antibiotics, while a ratio <1 favors meropenem. Further analyses were performed to calculate the win odds and to introduce a continuous outcome variable in order to reduce ties., Results: With the hierarchy of all-cause mortality, microbiological relapse, and secondary infection, the win ratio estimate was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], .22-.71]; P = .002), favoring meropenem over piperacillin-tazobactam. However, 73.4% of the pairs were tied due to the small proportion of events. The win odds, a modification of the win ratio accounting for ties, was 0.79 (95% CI, .68-.92). The addition of length of stay to the primary composite greatly minimized the number of ties (4.6%) with a win ratio estimate of 0.77 (95% CI, .60-.99; P = .04)., Conclusions: The application of the win ratio methodology to the MERINO trial data illustrates its utility and feasibility for use in antimicrobial trials., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. L. P. has received research funding from Shionogi, Merck, Gilead, bioMérieux, BioVersys, and Pfizer; has received consulting fees from the AMR Action Fund, CARB-X, Aurobac, Innoviva, GSK, Pfizer, Merck, Cepheid, bioMérieux, and Spero; has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Merck, bioMérieux, and Cepheid; reports receipt of consumables for use in clinical trial from bioMérieux and receipt of antibiotics for use in clinical trials from Pfizer and Shionogi; and reports an unpaid role on the board of the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases. M. H. is an employee of Pfizer and holds Pfizer stock options. Y. M. has received honoraria from Pfizer. P. N. A. H. reports research grants from Gilead; served on an advisory board for Sandoz; received honoraria from OpGen, Gilead, and Pfizer; and received travel support and accommodation for a speaking event from Pfizer. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: Early recognition and effective treatment of sepsis improves outcomes in critically ill patients. However, antibiotic exposures are frequently suboptimal in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. We describe the feasibility of the Bayesian dosing software Individually Designed Optimum Dosing Strategies (ID-ODS™), to reduce time to effective antibiotic exposure in children and adults with sepsis in ICU., Methods: A multi-centre prospective, non-randomised interventional trial in three adult ICUs and one paediatric ICU. In a pre-intervention Phase 1, we measured the time to target antibiotic exposure in participants. In Phase 2, antibiotic dosing recommendations were made using ID-ODS™, and time to target antibiotic concentrations were compared to patients in Phase 1 (a pre-post-design)., Results: 175 antibiotic courses (Phase 1 = 123, Phase 2 = 52) were analysed from 156 participants. Across all patients, there was no difference in the time to achieve target exposures (8.7 h vs 14.3 h in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively, p = 0.45). Sixty-one courses in 54 participants failed to achieve target exposures within 24 h of antibiotic commencement (n = 36 in Phase 1, n = 18 in Phase 2). In these participants, ID-ODS™ was associated with a reduction in time to target antibiotic exposure (96 vs 36.4 h in Phase 1 and Phase 2, respectively, p < 0.01). These patients were less likely to exhibit subtherapeutic antibiotic exposures at 96 h (hazard ratio (HR) 0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01-0.05, p < 0.01). There was no difference observed in in-hospital mortality., Conclusions: Dosing software may reduce the time to achieve target antibiotic exposures. It should be evaluated further in trials to establish its impact on clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is one of the most common antibiotics administered to hospitalized patients. Its broad activity against gram-negative, gram-positive, and anaerobic pathogens; efficacy in clinical trials across diverse infection types and patient populations; and generally favorable toxicity profile make it a particularly appealing antibiotic agent. PTZ susceptibility interpretive criteria (ie, breakpoints) for the Enterobacterales were initially established in 1992, as the drug was undergoing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. In the ensuing 30 years, changes in the molecular epidemiology of the Enterobacterales and its impact on PTZ susceptibility testing, mounting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data generated from sophisticated techniques such as population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation, and disturbing safety signals in a large clinical trial prompted the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) to review available evidence to determine the need for revision of the PTZ breakpoints for Enterobacterales. After an extensive literature review and formal voting process, the susceptibility criteria were revised in the 2022 CLSI M100 document to the following: ≤8/4 µg/mL (susceptible), 16/4 µg/mL (susceptible dose-dependent), and ≥32/4 µg/mL (resistant). Herein, we provide a brief overview of the CLSI process of antibiotic breakpoint revisions and elaborate on the available data that ultimately led to the decision to revise the PTZ breakpoints., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. P. N. A. H. has received research grants from Merck & Co, Inc., Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, and Shionogi, Inc.; speaker's fees from Phizer, Inc., Sumitomo Corporation, and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals; and has served on advisory boards for Merck & Co, Inc. and Sandoz Pharmaceuticals. A. J. M. serves on the Advisory Board for Merck & Co, Inc. and Qpex Biopharma, and reports consulting fees from Merck & Co, Inc., Qpex Biopharma, and Melinta Therapeutics. E. W. serves on the speaker's bureau for AbbVie, Inc, Astellas Pharma, Melinta Therapeutics, and Shionogi, Inc., and on the advisory board for Shionogi, Inc., and Merck & Co, Inc.; and reports consulting fees from bioMerieux, Inc.. R. M. H. is a consultant for Roche, Pattern Bioscience, bioMerieux, Inc., Torus Biosystems, Merck & Co, Inc., Qpex Biopharma, and Melinta Therapeutics and reports grants or contracts from bioMerieux, Inc., Momentum Bioscience, International Health Management Associates (IHMA), Qiagen, Pattern Bioscience, and Specific Diagnostics; and stock or stock options include Accelerate Diagnostics, Specific Diagnostics, and NGD Diagnostics. All authors serve as unpaid volunteers for the CLSI. There was no external support for this work. P. D. T. reports no conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Cefiderocol is generally active against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp. (CRK) with higher MICs against metallo-beta-lactamase producers. There is a variation in cefiderocol interpretive criteria determined by EUCAST and CLSI. Our objective was to test CRK isolates against cefiderocol and compare cefiderocol susceptibilities using EUCAST and CLSI interpretive criteria., Methods: A unique collection ( n  = 254) of mainly OXA-48-like- or NDM-producing CRK bloodstream isolates were tested against cefiderocol with disc diffusion (Mast Diagnostics, UK). Beta-lactam resistance genes and multilocus sequence types were identified using bioinformatics analyses on complete bacterial genomes., Results: Median cefiderocol inhibition zone diameter was 24 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 24-26 mm) for all isolates and 18 mm (IQR 15-21 mm) for NDM producers. We observed significant variability between cefiderocol susceptibilities using EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints, such that 26% and 2% of all isolates, and 81% and 12% of the NDM producers were resistant to cefiderocol using EUCAST and CLSI interpretive criteria, respectively., Conclusions: Cefiderocol resistance rates among NDM producers are high using EUCAST criteria. Breakpoint variability may have significant implications on patient outcomes. Until more clinical outcome data are available, we suggest using EUCAST interpretive criteria for cefiderocol susceptibility testing.

Objective: To show the high analytical specificity of our multiplex microsphere polymerase chain reaction (mmPCR) method, which offers the simultaneous detection of both general (eg, Gram type) and specific (eg, Pseudomonas species) clinically relevant genetic targets in a single modular multiplex reaction., Materials and Methods: Isolated gDNA of 16S/rRNA Sanger-sequenced and Basic Local Alignment Tool-identified bacterial and fungal isolates were selectively amplified in a custom 10-plex Luminex MagPlex-TAG microsphere-based mmPCR assay. The signal/noise ratio for each reaction was calculated from flow cytometry standard data collected on a BD LSR Fortessa II flow cytometer. Data were normalized to the no-template negative control and the signal maximum. The analytical specificity of the assay was compared to single-plex SYBR chemistry quantitative PCR., Results: Both general and specific primer sets were functional in the 10-plex mmPCR. The general Gram typing and pan-fungal primers correctly identified all bacterial and fungal isolates, respectively. The species-specific and antibiotic resistance-specific primers correctly identified the species- and resistance-carrying isolates, respectively. Low-level cross-reactive signals were present in some reactions with high signal/noise primer ratios., Conclusion: We found that mmPCR can simultaneously detect specific and general clinically relevant genetic targets in multiplex. These results serve as a proof-of-concept advance that highlights the potential of high multiplex mmPCR diagnostics in clinical practice. Further development of specimen-specific DNA extraction techniques is required for sensitivity testing., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pathology.)

Objectives: Optimal treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) infections is uncertain because of the lack of good-quality evidence and the limited effectiveness of available antibiotics. The aim of this survey was to investigate clinicians' prescribing strategies for treating CR-GNB infections worldwide., Methods: A 36-item questionnaire was developed addressing the following aspects of antibiotic prescribing: respondent's background, diagnostic and therapeutic availability, preferred antibiotic strategies and rationale for selecting combination therapy. Prescribers were recruited following the snowball sampling approach, and a post-stratification correction with inverse proportional weights was used to adjust the sample's representativeness., Results: A total of 1012 respondents from 95 countries participated in the survey. Overall, 298 (30%) of the respondents had local guidelines for treating CR-GNB at their facility and 702 (71%) had access to Infectious Diseases consultation, with significant discrepancies according to country economic status: 85% (390/502) in high-income countries versus 59% (194/283) in upper-medium-income countries and 30% (118/196) in lower-middle-income countries/lower-income-countries). Targeted regimens varied widely, ranging from 40 regimens for CR-Acinetobacter spp. to more than 100 regimens for CR-Enterobacteriaceae. Although the majority of respondents acknowledged the lack of evidence behind this choice, dual combination was the preferred treatment scheme and carbapenem-polymyxin was the most prescribed regimen, irrespective of pathogen and infection source. Respondents noticeably disagreed around the meaning of 'combination therapy' with 20% (150/783) indicating the simple addition of multiple compounds, 42% (321/783) requiring the presence of in vitro activity and 38% (290/783) requiring in vitro synergism., Conclusions: Management of CR-GNB infections is far from being standardized. Strategic public health focused randomized controlled trials are urgently required to inform evidence-based treatment guidelines., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is the standard of care for treating bacterial infections. In randomized clinical trials of new antimicrobials, AST might not be performed or reported in real time., Objectives: To determine local, real-time laboratory AST performance, its usage in the trial flow, quality control (QC) of the local testing, central AST performance and the effect of using AST categorization on the trials' primary outcomes., Data Sources: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO and Web of Science., Eligibility Criteria: We included registered randomized controlled trials published in journals between January 2015 and December 2019., Participants and Interventions: We included trials comparing different antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused predominantly by Gram-negative bacteria., Methods: Primary outcomes for different trial populations were extracted and differences between trial arms were compared for patients with infections caused by susceptible versus non-susceptible bacteria. Results are described narratively., Results: Of 32 randomized trials, 25 trials reported that local AST was performed, 1312 reported the local laboratory AST methods, no trial reported QC, but post-hoc referral for AST at a reference laboratory was common. Patients' outcomes were superior when patients with infections due to susceptible and non-susceptible pathogens were compared post hoc (median difference 14%, interquartile range 8%-24%) in trials allowing this comparison (seven antimicrobials), except for colistin, where 14-day mortality was 9% higher when patients were treated with colistin for colistin-susceptible versus colistin-resistant carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. When excluding patients with pathogens that were non-susceptible to either antimicrobial in the trials, the difference in the primary outcome between the trial arms was reduced in five out of six trials., Conclusions: Trials should perform AST to guide patient inclusion or exclusion from the study and consider the impact of the central laboratory susceptibility results on the study outcomes when using post-hoc reference testing., (Copyright © 2021 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales continue to pose a major threat to human health worldwide. Given the limited therapeutic options available to treat infections caused by these pathogens, identifying additional effective antimicrobials or revisiting existing drugs is important. Ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae containing CTX-M-type ESBLs or AmpC, in addition to narrow-spectrum OXA and SHV enzymes, were selected from blood culture isolates obtained from the MERINO trial. Isolates had previously undergone whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to identify antimicrobial resistance genes. Cefotetan MICs were determined by broth microdilution (BMD) testing with a concentration range of 0.125 to 64 mg/liter; CLSI breakpoints were used for susceptibility interpretation. BMD was performed using an automated digital antibiotic dispensing platform (Tecan D300e). One hundred ten E. coli and 40 K. pneumoniae isolates were used. CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-27 were the most common beta-lactamases present; only 7 isolates had coexistent ampC genes. Overall, 98.7% of isolates were susceptible, with MIC 50 s and MIC 90 s of 0.25 mg/liter and 2 mg/liter (range, ≤0.125 to 64 mg/liter), respectively. MICs appeared higher among isolates with ampC genes present, with an MIC 50 of 16 mg/liter, than among those containing CTX-M-15, which had an MIC 50 of only 0.5 mg/liter. Isolates with an ampC gene exhibited an overall susceptibility of 85%. Presence of a narrow-spectrum OXA beta-lactamase did not appear to alter the cefotetan MIC distribution. Cefotetan demonstrated favorable in vitro efficacy against ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae bloodstream isolates. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem antibiotics remain the treatment of choice for severe infection due to ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales . The use of carbapenems is a major driver of the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, which are often resistant to most available antimicrobials. Cefotetan is a cephamycin antibiotic developed in the 1980s that demonstrates enhanced resistance to beta-lactamases and has a broad spectrum of activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Cefotetan holds potential to be a carbapenem-sparing treatment option. Data on the in vitro activity of cefotetan against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales remain scarce. Our study assessed the in vitro activity of cefotetan against ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible blood culture isolates obtained from patients enrolled in the MERINO trial.

Antimicrobial-resistant ESKAPE ( E nterococcus faecium , S taphylococcus aureus , K lebsiella pneumoniae , A cinetobacter baumannii , P seudomonas aeruginosa , and E nterobacter species) pathogens represent a global threat to human health. The acquisition of antimicrobial resistance genes by ESKAPE pathogens has reduced the treatment options for serious infections, increased the burden of disease, and increased death rates due to treatment failure and requires a coordinated global response for antimicrobial resistance surveillance. This looming health threat has restimulated interest in the development of new antimicrobial therapies, has demanded the need for better patient care, and has facilitated heightened governance over stewardship practices., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.)

Purpose of Review: This article aims to give a state-of-the-art assessment of treatment options for bloodstream infection because of ceftriaxone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, especially those caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) or AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae. In particular, this review assesses whether current data support 'carbapenem-sparing options' for treatment of these serious infections., Recent Findings: The MERINO trial refuted earlier observational studies some of which showed equivalence in outcomes between beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and carbapenems for treatment of bloodstream infection because of ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. Although numerous factors influence mortality following bloodstream infection, the variability in piperacillin/tazobactam MICs observed in the MERINO trial make this a less secure option than meropenem. However, the search for carbapenem-sparing options continues with four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in progress and a number of other options in clinical development., Summary: Hard outcomes from RCTs are still needed before intravenous carbapenems can be displaced as the treatment of choice for ceftriaxone-resistant Gram-negative bacilli.

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Resistance to last-line polymyxins mediated by the plasmid-borne mobile colistin resistance gene ( mcr-1 ) represents a new threat to global human health. Here we present the complete genome sequence of an mcr-1 -positive multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli strain (MS8345). We show that MS8345 belongs to serotype O2:K1:H4, has a large 241,164-bp IncHI2 plasmid that carries 15 other antibiotic resistance genes (including the extended-spectrum β-lactamase bla ) and 3 putative multidrug efflux systems, and contains 14 chromosomally encoded antibiotic resistance genes. MS8345 also carries a large ColV-like virulence plasmid that has been associated with CTX-M-1 bacteremia. Whole-genome phylogeny revealed that MS8345 clusters within a discrete clade in the sequence type 95 (ST95) lineage, and MS8345 is very closely related to the highly virulent O45:K1:H4 clone associated with neonatal meningitis. Overall, the acquisition of a plasmid carrying resistance to colistin and multiple other antibiotics in this virulent E. coli bacteremia. Whole-genome phylogeny revealed that MS8345 clusters within a discrete clade in the sequence type 95 (ST95) lineage, and MS8345 is very closely related to the highly virulent O45:K1:H4 clone associated with neonatal meningitis. Overall, the acquisition of a plasmid carrying resistance to colistin and multiple other antibiotics in this virulent E. coli ST95 is a globally disseminated clone frequently associated with bloodstream infections and neonatal meningitis. However, the ST95 lineage is defined by low levels of drug resistance amongst clinical isolates, which normally provides for uncomplicated treatment options. Here, we provide the first detailed genomic analysis of an IMPORTANCE Escherichia coli gene. Finding an ST95 isolate resistant to nearly all antibiotics that also has a high virulence potential is of major clinical importance and underscores the need to monitor new and emerging trends in antibiotic resistance development in this important global lineage.E. coli ST95 isolate that has both high virulence potential and resistance to multiple antibiotics. Using the genome, we predicted its virulence and antibiotic resistance mechanisms, which include resistance to last-line antibiotics mediated by the plasmid-borne mcr-1 gene. Finding an ST95 isolate resistant to nearly all antibiotics that also has a high virulence potential is of major clinical importance and underscores the need to monitor new and emerging trends in antibiotic resistance development in this important global lineage., (Copyright © 2018 Forde et al.)

Importance: Extended-spectrum β-lactamases mediate resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (eg, ceftriaxone) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Significant infections caused by these strains are usually treated with carbapenems, potentially selecting for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be an effective "carbapenem-sparing" option to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers., Objectives: To determine whether definitive therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam is noninferior to meropenem (a carbapenem) in patients with bloodstream infection caused by ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible E coli or K pneumoniae., Design, Setting, and Participants: Noninferiority, parallel group, randomized clinical trial included hospitalized patients enrolled from 26 sites in 9 countries from February 2014 to July 2017. Adult patients were eligible if they had at least 1 positive blood culture with E coli or Klebsiella spp testing nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. Of 1646 patients screened, 391 were included in the study., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam, 4.5 g, every 6 hours (n = 188 participants) or meropenem, 1 g, every 8 hours (n = 191 participants) for a minimum of 4 days, up to a maximum of 14 days, with the total duration determined by the treating clinician., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization. A noninferiority margin of 5% was used., Results: Among 379 patients (mean age, 66.5 years; 47.8% women) who were randomized appropriately, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were included in the primary analysis population, 378 (99.7%) completed the trial and were assessed for the primary outcome. A total of 23 of 187 patients (12.3%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome of mortality at 30 days compared with 7 of 191 (3.7%) randomized to meropenem (risk difference, 8.6% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 14.5%]; P = .90 for noninferiority). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Nonfatal serious adverse events occurred in 5 of 188 patients (2.7%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 3 of 191 (1.6%) in the meropenem group., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with E coli or K pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance, definitive treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem did not result in a noninferior 30-day mortality. These findings do not support use of piperacillin-tazobactam in this setting., Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifiers: ACTRN12613000532707 and ACTRN12615000403538 and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02176122.

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are recognized as a cause of difficult-to-treat infections associated with high mortality., Objectives: To perform a systematic review of currently available data on distribution, characteristics and outcome associated with carbapenem-resistant bloodstream infections in adult neutropenic patients., Methods: Included studies were identified through Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases between January 1995 and April 2016. Random effect meta-analysis was used to quantify the association between carbapenem resistance and mortality and between carbapenem exposure and resistance., Results: A total of 30 studies from 21 countries were included. Overall carbapenem resistance varied from 2% to 53% (median 9%) among studies. Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp . were reported in 18 (60%) studies showing high median resistance rates (44% of all carbapenem-resistant Gram-negatives and 19% of Pseudomonas isolates). Resistance of Enterobacteriaceae was less commonly reported and bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp. were mainly documented from endemic areas (Greece, Italy, Israel). Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter spp. was reported in 9 (30%) studies (median resistance 58% of Acinetobacter isolates). Mortality rates ranged from 33% to 71% (median 50%) in patients with carbapenem-resistant infections. Carbapenem resistance appeared to correlate with mortality (OR 4.89, 95% CI 3.30-7.26) and previous exposure to carbapenems (OR 4.63, 95% CI 3.08-6.96)., Conclusions: Carbapenem resistance represents a threat to neutropenic patients. In this group, resistance is likely promoted by previous carbapenem use and leads to high mortality rates. The knowledge of resistance patterns is crucial and can direct clinicians in the use of alternatives to carbapenem-based regimens., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Scrub typhus is caused by the obligate intracellular bacterium Orientia tsutsugamushi and is endemic to many countries in the Asia-Pacific region, including tropical Australia. We describe a recent large outbreak amongst military personnel in north Queensland. A total of 45 clinical cases were identified (36% of all potentially exposed individuals). This occurred despite existing military protocols stipulating the provision of doxycycline prophylaxis. Doxycycline resistance in O. tsutsugamushi has been described in South-East Asia, but not Australia. In one case, O. tsutsugamushi was cultured from eschar tissue and blood. Using quantitative real-time PCR to determine susceptibility to doxycycline for the outbreak strain, a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ≤0.04 μg/mL was found, indicating susceptibility to this agent. It seems most probable that failure to adhere to adequate prophylaxis over the duration of the military exercise accounted for the large number of cases encountered rather than doxycycline resistance., (Copyright © 2016 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae are a common cause of bacteraemia in endemic countries and may be associated with high mortality; carbapenems are considered the drug of choice. Limited data suggest piperacillin-tazobactam could be equally effective. We aimed to compare 30-day mortality of patients treated empirically with piperacillin-tazobactam versus a carbapenem in a multi-centre retrospective cohort study in Singapore. Only patients with active empiric monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam or a carbapenem were included. A propensity score for empiric carbapenem therapy was derived and an adjusted multivariate analysis of mortality was conducted. A total of 394 patients had ESBL-Escherichia.coli and ESBL-Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia of which 23.1% were community acquired cases. One hundred and fifty-one received initial active monotherapy comprising piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 94) or a carbapenem (n = 57). Patients who received carbapenems were less likely to have health-care associated risk factors and have an unknown source of bacteraemia, but were more likely to have a urinary source. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between those who received empiric piperacillin-tazobactam and a carbapenem (29 [30.9%] vs. 17 [29.8%]), P = 0.89). Those who received empiric piperacillin-tazobactam had a lower 30-day acquisition of multi-drug resistant and fungal infections (7 [7.4%] vs. 14 [24.6%]), P<0.01). After adjusting for confounders, use of empiric piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI; 0.45-2.17). Empiric piperacillin-tazobactam was not associated with increased 30-day mortality and may result in fewer multi-drug resistant and fungal infections when compared with a carbapenem.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared effects of different antibiotics on mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae with chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase., Methods: Databases were systematically searched for studies reporting mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by AmpC producers treated with carbapenems, broad-spectrum β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs), quinolones or cefepime. Pooled ORs for mortality were calculated for cases that received monotherapy with these agents versus carbapenems., Registration: PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42014014992; 18 November 2014)., Results: Eleven observational studies were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting empirical and definitive monotherapy. In unadjusted analyses, no significant difference in mortality was found between BLBLIs versus carbapenems used for definitive therapy (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.32-2.36) or empirical therapy (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.14-1.60) or cefepime versus carbapenems as definitive therapy (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.27-1.38) or empirical therapy (0.60; 95% CI 0.17-2.20). Use of a fluoroquinolone as definitive therapy was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with carbapenems (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.78). Three studies with patient-level data were used to adjust for potential confounders. The non-significant trends favouring non-carbapenem options in these studies were diminished after adjustment for age, sex and illness severity scores, suggestive of residual confounding., Conclusions: Despite limitations of available data, there was no strong evidence to suggest that BLBLIs, quinolones or cefepime were inferior to carbapenems. The reduced risk of mortality observed with quinolone use may reflect less serious illness in patients, rather than superiority over carbapenems., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes in Enterobacteriaceae such as Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp is a major challenge to modern medical practice. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice for serious infections caused by ESBL producers; however, carbapenem resistance has increased globally. ESBL producers might be susceptible to β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combination antibiotics such piperacillin-tazobactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate. These drugs are frequently avoided in serious infections caused by ESBL producers because of the inoculum effect in-vitro (especially for piperacillin-tazobactam), animal data suggesting inferior efficacy when compared with carbapenems, concerns about pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug target attainment with standard doses, and poor outcomes shown in some observational studies. Prospective cohort data and a meta-analysis suggest that BLBLIs are non-inferior to carbapenems in the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by ESBL producers. We examine why BLBLIs are perceived as inferior in the treatment of infection with ESBL producers, and discuss data that suggest these concerns might not be strongly supported by clinical evidence., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. frequently cause bloodstream infections. There has been a worldwide increase in resistance in these species to antibiotics such as third generation cephalosporins, largely driven by the acquisition of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase or plasmid-mediated AmpC enzymes. Carbapenems have been considered the most effective therapy for serious infections caused by such resistant bacteria; however, increased use creates selection pressure for carbapenem resistance, an emerging threat arising predominantly from the dissemination of genes encoding carbapenemases. Recent retrospective data suggest that beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam, may be non-inferior to carbapenems for the treatment of bloodstream infection caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producers, if susceptible in vitro. This study aims to test this hypothesis in an effort to define carbapenem-sparing alternatives for these infections., Methods/design: The study will use a multicentre randomised controlled open-label non-inferiority trial design comparing two treatments, meropenem (standard arm) and piperacillin-tazobactam (carbapenem-sparing arm) in adult patients with bacteraemia caused by E. coli or Klebsiella spp. demonstrating non-susceptibility to third generation cephalosporins. Recruitment is planned to occur in sites across three countries (Australia, New Zealand and Singapore). A total sample size of 454 patients will be required to achieve 80% power to determine non-inferiority with a margin of 5%. Once randomised, definitive treatment will be for a minimum of 4 days, but up to 14 days with total duration determined by treating clinicians. Data describing demographic information, antibiotic use, co-morbid conditions, illness severity, source of infection and other risk factors will be collected. Vital signs, white cell count, use of vasopressors and days to bacteraemia clearance will be recorded up to day 7. The primary outcome measure will be mortality at 30 days, with secondary outcomes including days to clinical and microbiological resolution, microbiological failure or relapse, isolation of a multi-resistant organism or Clostridium difficile infection., Trial Registration: The MERINO trial is registered under the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ANZCTR), reference number: ACTRN12613000532707 (registered 13 May 2013) and the US National Institute of Health ClinicalTrials.gov register, reference number: NCT02176122 (registered 24 June 2014).