Search

Purpose: To compare two intensity levels (standard vs. enhanced) of a nutrition and physical activity intervention vs. a control (usual programs) on nutrition knowledge, body mass index, fitness, academic performance, behavior, and medication use among elementary school students.Design: Quasi-experimental with three arms.Setting: Elementary schools, students' homes, and a supermarket.Subjects: A total of 1487 third-grade students.Intervention: The standard intervention (SI) provided daily physical activity in classrooms and a program on making healthful foods, using food labels. The enhanced intervention (EI) provided these plus additional components for students and their families.Measures: Body mass index (zBMI), food label literacy, physical fitness, academic performance, behavior, and medication use for asthma or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Analysis: Multivariable generalized linear model and logistic regression to assess change in outcome measures.Results: Both the SI and EI groups gained less weight than the control (p < .001), but zBMI did not differ between groups (p = 1.00). There were no apparent effects on physical fitness or academic performance. Both intervention groups improved significantly but similarly in food label literacy (p = .36). Asthma medication use was reduced significantly in the SI group, and nonsignificantly (p = .10) in the EI group. Use of ADHD medication remained unchanged (p = .34).Conclusion: The standard intervention may improve food label literacy and reduce asthma medication use in elementary school children, but an enhanced version provides no further benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effects of nut-based snack bars (NBSB) vs. prepackaged 200-kcal portions of typical conventional snack foods, when consumed over a 12-week period by a group of overweight adults.Design: Randomized, single-blind parallel design with two treatment groups.Setting: Clinical Trial: Subjects: Thirty-four overweight participants were enrolled.Intervention: Commercially available NBSB or conventional snack foods as part of an ad libitum diet for 12 weeks.Measures: Primary Outcome Measures: body mass index, body weight, body composition, waist circumference.Secondary Outcome Measures: blood pressure, lipid profile, nutrients intake, hunger/satiety, quality of life.Analysis: Generalized linear models with time as repeated measure were used to analyze these data.Results: Daily consumption of NBSB for 12 weeks, as compared to daily consumption of conventional snacks, significantly reduced percentage body fat (-1.7% ± 10.8% vs. 6.2% ± 9.3%; p = .04) and visceral fat (-1.3 ± 5.9 vs. 2.7 ± 4.0; p = .03). There were no between-group differences (p > .05) for blood pressure, lipid panel, satiety, or quality of life measures.Conclusion: Our data suggest that daily consumption of NBSB for 12 weeks reduced body fat and had no adverse effects on weight, blood pressure, lipid profile, satiety, or quality of life in this small sample of overweight adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]