Advancing School and Community Engagement Now for Disease Prevention (ASCEND).

<bold>Purpose: </bold>To compare two intensity levels (standard vs. enhanced) of a nutrition and physical activity intervention vs. a control (usual programs) on nutrition knowledge, body mass index, fitness, academic performance, behavior, and medication use among elementary school students.<bold>Design: </bold>Quasi-experimental with three arms.<bold>Setting: </bold>Elementary schools, students' homes, and a supermarket.<bold>Subjects: </bold>A total of 1487 third-grade students.<bold>Intervention: </bold>The standard intervention (SI) provided daily physical activity in classrooms and a program on making healthful foods, using food labels. The enhanced intervention (EI) provided these plus additional components for students and their families.<bold>Measures: </bold>Body mass index (zBMI), food label literacy, physical fitness, academic performance, behavior, and medication use for asthma or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).<bold>Analysis: </bold>Multivariable generalized linear model and logistic regression to assess change in outcome measures.<bold>Results: </bold>Both the SI and EI groups gained less weight than the control (p < .001), but zBMI did not differ between groups (p = 1.00). There were no apparent effects on physical fitness or academic performance. Both intervention groups improved significantly but similarly in food label literacy (p = .36). Asthma medication use was reduced significantly in the SI group, and nonsignificantly (p = .10) in the EI group. Use of ADHD medication remained unchanged (p = .34).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The standard intervention may improve food label literacy and reduce asthma medication use in elementary school children, but an enhanced version provides no further benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]