Search

Objectives: To evaluate clinical reinfarction during a 3-year follow-up after randomization to primary angioplasty versus fibrinolysis in anterior and non-anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: Clinical reinfarction was prospectively assessed by an endpoint committee blinded to the study treatment. Results: At 30 days, primary angioplasty compared with fibrinolysis reduced the reinfarction rate both in anterior STEMI patients (n = 823; 2.5 vs. 5.6%, p = 0.02) and in non-anterior STEMI patients (n = 743; 0.8 vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001). After 3 years, the reduction in reinfarction rate was no longer present in anterior STEMI patients (11.2 vs. 11.2%, p = 0.86), but persisted in non-anterior STEMI patients (5.2 vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001). Reinfarction after anterior STEMI carried a higher mortality than reinfarction after non-anterior STEMI (37.6 vs. 15.3%, p = 0.01). Independent predictors of death were: age [hazard ratio (HR) per 1-year increase in age = 1.08 (1.07–1.09)], clinical reinfarction [HR = 5.15 (3.57–7.43)], anterior index STEMI [HR = 1.65 (1.24–2.19)], and Killip class ≥2 [HR = 1.42 (1.01–2.00)]. The additional late reinfarctions after angioplasty for anterior STEMI were located within the angioplasty-treated target segment. Anterior STEMI patients had smaller mean target vessel diameter, which was associated with reinfarction. Conclusions: Clinical reinfarction is an independent predictor of death. The early superiority of primary angioplasty over fibrinolysis on reinfarction rate after anterior STEMI diminished during long-term follow-up. Copyright © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was conducted to evaluate the short- and long-term clinical and angiographic results of implantation of a flexible, coiled stainless steel stent, the Freedom Coronary Stent. During the study period this stent was used as an alternative to the Palmaz-Schatz PS153 coronary stent in long or tortuous lesions. The study was designed as a prospectively planned outcome analysis. Implantation of Freedom stents was attempted in 62 consecutive patients (56% males, mean age 63 ± 10 years) with a total of 65 coronary lesions. Indications for stent implantation were: restenosis, 8%; recoil, 26%; visible dissection, 32%; threatening occlusion, 15%; chronic total occlusion, 18%. The average stent length was 30 ± 16 mm and 67% of the lesions were type C. Rate of successful stent implantation, acute complications, angiographic restenosis after 6 months and major cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) during follow-up were assessed. The success rate of stent implantation was 94%. One patient died after an emergency bypass operation and one patient suffered a subacute stent thrombosis, which was successfully treated with re-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). There were no Q- or non-Q myocardial infarctions. Clinical follow-up was carried out in 56 patients (97%) and 57 vessels were assessed by angiography (93%). Mean length of the follow-up period was 6.8 ± 2.3 months. During the 6 months' follow-up period, one patient died, two patients suffered an acute non-Q myocardial infarction and eight patients had revascularization of the target vessel. Major cardiac event rate for all patients where stent implantation was intended was 23%. Angina CCS class declined from 3.0 ± 0.9 to 1.1 ± 0.8 (p < 0.01) before PTCA to follow-up. Overall restenosis rate was 28%. In 14 lesions with a stented segment length of <20 mm, the restenosis rate was 21%; in 31 lesions with a stented segment length ≥20 and <30 mm, the restenosis rate was 26%; and in 13 lesions with a stented segment length of ≥30 mm, the restenosis rate was 42%. Although there was a high procedural success rate after implantation of the Freedom stent in long or tortuous lesions, problems with high restenosis rates in long lesions remain unresolved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The interval from the first alert of the healthcare system to the initiation of reperfusion therapy (system delay) is associated with mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The importance of system delay in patients treated with fibrinolysis versus pPCI has not been assessed. We obtained data on system delay from the Danish Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 study, which randomized 1,572 patients to fibrinolysis or pPCI. The study end points were 30-day and 8-year mortality. The short system delays were associated with reduced absolute mortality in both the fibrinolysis group (<1 hour, 5.6%; 1 to 2 hours, 6.9%; 2 to 3 hours, 9.5%; and >3 hours, 11.5%; test for trend, p = 0.08) and pPCI group (<1 hour, not assessed; 1 to 2 hours, 2.6%; 2 to 3 hours, 7.5%; >3 hours, 7.7%; test for trend, p = 0.02). The lowest 30-day mortality was obtained with pPCI and a system delay of 1 to 2 hours (vs fibrinolysis within <1 hour, adjusted hazard ratio 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 1.10; p = 0.07; vs fibrinolysis within 1 to 2 hours, adjusted hazard ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.95; p = 0.04). pPCI and system delay >3 hours was associated with a similar 30-day and 8-year mortality as fibrinolysis within 1 to 2 hours. In conclusion, short system delays are associated with reduced mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolysis as well as pPCI. pPCI performed with a system delay of <2 hours is associated with lower mortality than fibrinolysis performed with a faster or similar system delay. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Background: The evidence of long-term efficacy and safety after implantation of DES in patients with complex lesions is scarce. Methods: We randomly assigned 626 patients with STEMI referred within 12 h to have a DES or a BMS implanted in the infarct-related lesion with or without distal protection during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Results: At 3 years, target lesion revascularization was 6.1% in the DES group compared with 16.3% in the BMS group (p < 0.001), and the rate of major adverse cardiac events was 11.5% versus 18.2%, respectively (p = 0.02). Whereas all-cause mortality did not differ significantly, the rate of cardiac death was higher in the DES group, 6.1% versus 1.9% for the BMS group (p = 0.01). The occurrence of reinfarction, stroke, and stent thrombosis was similar. Conclusions: Implantation of DES in patients with STEMI reduces the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events compared with BMS, but patients with DES had a higher risk of cardiac death not attributed to myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. (Drug Elution and Distal Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [DEDICATION]; NCT00192868) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a randomised trial which tested the hypothesis on the link between myocardial salvage and remote ischaemic conditioning during evolving ST-elevation myocardial infarction before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The study involved 333 consecutive adult patients with suspected first acute myocardial infarction, who received remote conditioning before hospital admission. The researchers concluded that myocardial salvage could be increased by remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission and could serve as a complement to angioplasty.

This study evaluated the timing, causes, and predictors of death during long-term follow-up after primary angioplasty with stent implantation versus in-hospital fibrinolysis with a tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase). We randomized 1,572 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction to primary angioplasty or alteplase and followed them for 3 years. The causes of death were prospectively assessed by an end point committee unaware of the study treatment. A total of 225 patients (14.3%) died, 113 within the first 30 days and 112 between 31 days and 3 years. The mortality and causes of death did not differ between the 2 treatments. The causes of death were cardiogenic shock/congestive heart failure (41%), sudden death (17%), other cardiac death (10%), cancer (12%), and other noncardiac death (20%). Cardiac death was predominant during the first month only (86% of early deaths), and noncardiac death and cardiac death were equally frequent after 30 days (49% and 51% of late deaths, respectively). Independent predictors of death after discharge were age, left ventricular ejection fraction, diabetes, Killip class, and a lack of treatment with a β blocker or statin. In conclusion, the causes of death did not differ between alteplase treatment and primary angioplasty with stent implantation. One half of the deaths within 3 years after ST-elevation myocardial infarction occurred during the first 30 days, and cardiac death was predominant during the first 30 days only. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: For the treatment of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation, primary angioplasty is considered superior to fibrinolysis for patients who are admitted to hospitals with angioplasty facilities. Whether this benefit is maintained for patients who require transportation from a community hospital to a center where invasive treatment is available is uncertain. Methods: We randomly assigned 1572 patients with acute myocardial infarction to treatment with angioplasty or accelerated treatment with intravenous alteplase; 1129 patients were enrolled at 24 referral hospitals and 443 patients at 5 invasive-treatment centers. The primary study end point was a composite of death, clinical evidence of reinfarction, or disabling stroke at 30 days. Results: Among patients who underwent randomization at referral hospitals, the primary end point was reached in 8.5 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group, as compared with 14.2 percent of those in the fibrinolysis group (P=0.002). The results were similar among patients who were enrolled at invasive-treatment centers: 6.7 percent of the patients in the angioplasty group reached the primary end point, as compared with 12.3 percent in the fibrinolysis group (P=0.05). Among all patients, the better outcome after angioplasty was driven primarily by a reduction in the rate of reinfarction (1.6 percent in the angioplasty group vs. 6.3 percent in the fibrinolysis group, P<0.001); no significant differences were observed in the rate of death (6.6 percent vs. 7.8 percent, P=0.35) or the rate of stroke (1.1 percent vs. 2.0 percent, P=0.15). Ninety-six percent of patients were transferred from referral hospitals to an invasive-treatment center within two hours. Conclusions: A strategy for reperfusion involving the transfer of patients to an invasive-treatment center for primary angioplasty is superior to on-site fibrinolysis, provided that the transfer takes two hours or less. N Engl J Med 2003;349:733-42. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]