Search

Background: This study examined the cutaneous analgesic effects of lidocaine co-injected with guanfacine and its comparison with dexmedetomidine., Methods: Cutaneous analgesic effects are quantified through the blocking effects of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex against skin pinpricks in rats. The dose-response curves of guanfacine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine were constructed and drug-drug interactions were analyzed by the ED 50 isobologram., Results: Subcutaneous injections of guanfacine, dexmedetomidine, and lidocaine produced dose-dependently nociceptive/sensory blockade. On the ED 50 (50% effective dose) basis, the potency rankings of the drug are dexmedetomidine (0.09 [0.08-0.11] μmol/kg) > guanfacine (3.98 [2.96-5.34] μmol/kg) > lidocaine (25.40 [23.51-27.44] μmol/kg) ( p  < 0.01). On their equipotent doses (ED 25 , ED 50 , and ED 75 ), the duration of sensory blockade induced by guanfacine or dexmedetomidine was longer than lidocaine's ( p  < 0.01). Both guanfacine and dexmedetomidine showed synergistic effects with lidocaine., Conclusions: We showed that guanfacine elicits dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia when administered subcutaneously. Lidocaine is less potent than guanfacine or dexmedetomidine. Both guanfacine and dexmedetomidine enhance the potency and duration of lidocaine. Better synergistic responses we are getting with guanfacine plus lidocaine.

Objectives: The purpose of the experiment was to estimate whether intrathecal antimalarial drugs could provoke spinal block, and their comparison with lidocaine., Methods: Rats were intrathecally administrated with antimalarial agents (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) and lidocaine, and neurobehavioural examinations (nociception, proprioception and motor function) were assessed; n = 8 per group. One-way and two-way analysis of variance were designed to analyse data., Key Findings: At a concentration of 20 mM, primaquine (0.46 mg/rat) exhibited the longest duration and the most potent effect of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor blockade (P < 0.01) among five drugs, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency of spinal blockade compared with lidocaine (0.29 mg/rat). In dose-dependent studies, primaquine was more potent (P < 0.01) than lidocaine for spinal block. At ED25, ED50 and ED75 equipotent doses, primaquine produced a greater duration of spinal motor, proprioceptive and nociceptive blockade when compared with lidocaine (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine produced spinal blockade. Primaquine was more potent and displayed a prolonged life of local anaesthetic effect compared with lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial drugs displayed a lesser or similar potency compared with lidocaine., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to estimate the ability of antimalarial medications to induce local infiltration analgesia., Methods: Using a rat model of skin infiltration anaesthesia, the effects of antimalarial medications (primaquine, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine) were compared with the application of lidocaine., Key Findings: At a dose of 3 μmol, primaquine and chloroquine displayed better potency (all P < 0.05) and greater duration (all P < 0.01) of cutaneous analgesia than lidocaine, whereas the other antimalarial medications showed a similar potency and duration of cutaneous analgesia when compared with lidocaine. When a dose of 3 μmol antimalarial medication was used, primaquine was the most potent and had the longest duration of action among four antimalarial medications. The relative potency ranking (ED50, 50% effective dose) has been found to be primaquine [2.10 (1.87 - 2.37) μmol] > lidocaine [6.27 (5.32 -7.39) μmol] (P < 0.01). Infiltration analgesia of skin with primaquine had a greater duration of action than did lidocaine on the equipotent (ED25, ED50, ED75) basis (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Primaquine and chloroquine have greater potency and longer lasting skin analgesia when compared with lidocaine, while the other antimalarials display a similar potency in comparison with lidocaine., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of chloroquine and chloroquine in combination with vasoconstrictor epinephrine to act as a local anesthetic in skin analgesia. After subcutaneous injection of drugs in rats, the inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) is designed for evaluation of the cutaneous analgesic effect. The analgesic effect of chloroquine was compared with that of bupivacaine or coadministration of chloroquine and epinephrine. Chloroquine produced exactly the same local anesthesia as bupivacaine did in a dose-dependent manner. On the ED 50 (50 % effective dose) basis, the analgesic potency was chloroquine (4.81 [4.45-5.20] μmol) < bupivacaine (0.46 [0.40‒0.52] μmol) (p <  0.01). At every equipotent dose tested (ED 25 , ED 50 and ED 75 ), chloroquine had a longer duration of cutaneous analgesia than bupivacaine (p <  0.01). Epinephrine enhanced the potency and duration of chloroquine-induced cutaneous analgesia. We found that chloroquine and bupivacaine elicit dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia. Chloroquine is not as potent as bupivacaine, but acts as an infiltrative anesthetic for a longer duration of time and is more potent and effective when used in combination with epinephrine., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study sought to assess the cutaneous (peripheral) analgesic effects of antihistamine chlorpheniramine, compared with the long-lasting local anesthetic bupivacaine., Methods: After chlorpheniramine and bupivacaine were subcutaneously injected under the dorsal skin of the rats, the cutaneous analgesia effect was quantitatively evaluated by scoring the number to which the animal failed to react (cutaneous trunci muscle reflex). The quality and duration of chlorpheniramine and bupivacaine on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia were compared., Results: We revealed that subcutaneous chlorpheniramine, as well as the local anesthetic bupivacaine elicited cutaneous analgesia in a dosage-dependent manner. Based on their ED 50 s (50% effective doses), the relative potency was found to be chlorpheniramine [1.13 (1.05-1.22) μmol] < bupivacaine [0.52 (0.46-0.58) μmol] (p < 0.01). When comparing the ED 25 s, ED 50 s and ED 75 s, full recovery time induced by chlorpheniramine was longer (p < 0.01) than that induced by bupivacaine., Conclusions: Our preclinical data demonstrated that both chlorpheniramine and bupivacaine dose-dependently provoked the cutaneous analgesic effects. Chlorpheniramine with a more prolonged duration was less potent than bupivacaine in inducing cutaneous analgesia.

Brompheniramine as an antihistamine blocked sodium channels, and local anesthetics by blocking sodium channels produced the local anesthetic effects. The authors aimed to assess local anesthetic quality and duration of brompheniramine when compared to the local anesthetic mepivacaine. After rats were shaved and injected subcutaneously on the dorsal skin, the panniculus reflex, induced via applying a noxious pinprick to the skin (injected area), was scored. The dose-response curve and nociceptive block duration of brompheniramine were constructed and compared with mepivacaine. The cutaneous analgesic effects in both brompheniramine and mepivacaine groups were concentration-dependent. On the basis of the amount required to produce a 50% block effect (ED 50 , 50% effective dose), the drug's potency was brompheniramine (0.89 [0.82-0.96] μmol) better than mepivacaine (2.45 [2.17-2.76] μmol) (P < 0.01). Full recovery time of brompheniramine was more prolonged than mepivacaine's (P < 0.01) on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia when comparing ED 25 s, ED 50 s and ED 75 s. Our preclinical data demonstrated that subcutaneous brompheniramine induces dose-relatedly analgesic effects, and brompheniramine induces prolonged analgesic duration when compared with mepivacaine. Brompheniramine also provokes better cutaneous analgesia than mepivacaine., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dextrorphan with long-acting local anesthetic effects did not cause system toxicity as fast as bupivacaine, while catecholamines (i.e., epinephrine) with the vasoconstrictive characteristics enhanced the effects of local anesthetic drugs. The objective of the experiment was to examine the synergistic effect of local dopamine (a catecholamine) injection on cutaneous antinociception of dextrorphan., Methods: The panniculus reflex in response to skin stimulation with a needle was used as the primary endpoint when dextrorphan (1.50, 2.61, 5.46, 10.20 and 20.40 μmol) alone, dopamine (16.20, 32.40, 51.60, 60.00 and 81.60 μmol) alone, or dopamine + dextrorphan (a ratio of ED 50 vs. ED 50 ) was injected subcutaneously on the rat's back. We used an isobolographic modelling approach to determine whether a synergistic effect would be observed., Results: We showed that dextrorphan, dopamine, or the mixture of dopamine and dextrorphan produced dose-related skin antinociception. The potency (ED 50 , 50% effective dose) for cutaneous antinociception was dextrorphan [6.02 (5.93-6.14) μmol] greater than dopamine [48.91 (48.80-49.06) μmol] (p < 0.01). The duration of nociceptive inhibition induced by dopamine was longer than that induced by dextrorphan (p <  0.01) based on their equipotent doses (ED 25 , ED 50 , and ED 75 ). Enhancement and prolongation of skin antinociception occurred after co-administration of dopamine with dextrorphan., Conclusions: When compared to dopamine, dextrorphan was more potent and had a shorter duration of skin nociceptive block. Dopamine produced a synergistic effect on dextrorphan-mediated antinociception, and prolonged dextrorphan's antinociceptive duration., (Copyright © 2019 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aim of the study was to investigate the analgesic effects of adding serotonin to oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine preparations. We employed a rat model of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) to conduct the dose-response curves and duration of drugs (oxybuprocaine, proxymetacaine, or serotonin) as an infiltrative anesthetic. The use of isobolographic methods to analyze the drug-drug interactions. We showed that oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine, as well as serotonin produced dose-dependent skin antinociception. On the basis of 50% effective dose (ED 50 ), the rank order of drug potency was serotonin [7.22 (6.45-8.09) μmol/kg] < oxybuprocaine [1.03 (0.93-1.15) μmol/kg] < proxymetacaine [0.59 (0.53-0.66) μmol/kg] (P < 0.01 for each comparison). The sensory block duration of serotonin was longer (P < 0.01) than that of oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine at the equipotent doses (ED 25 , ED 50 , and ED 75 ). The mixture of serotonin with oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine produced a better analgesic effect than the drug itself. We have concluded that oxybuprocaine, proxymetacaine, or serotonin displays dose-related cutaneous analgesia. Oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine is more potent and has a shorter duration of cutaneous analgesia than serotonin. Serotonin produces a synergistic antinociceptive interaction with oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pramoxine has been shown to produce spinal anesthesia, while cutaneous analgesia (peripheral) of pramoxine is not established. The experimental goal was to examine cutaneous antinociception produced by a local anesthetic (LA) pramoxine and compare this result with that of another well-known LA lidocaine., Methods: Cutaneous antinociception was evaluated by blockade of pinprick- induced cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) on the skin of rat's back. After the dose-related curves were constructed, the quality and duration of drug's (lidocaine and pramoxine) cutaneous antinociception were compared., Results: We showed that pramoxine, as well as lidocaine produced skin antinociception in a dose-related fashion. The relative potency (ED 50 [50% effective dose] basis) was lidocaine (5.44 [4.67-6.35] μmol) greater than pramoxine (42.1 [38.8-45.7] μmol) (p < 0.01). On the basis of equianalgesic doses (ED 75 , ED 50 , and ED 25 ), pramoxine caused equivalent duration of cutaneous antinociception to lidocaine., Conclusions: These preclinical data indicated that pramoxine elicits skin antinociception dose-relatedly. Pramoxine exhibits a potency less than that of lidocaine while they have a comparable duration of skin antinociceptive action., (Copyright © 2018 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We aimed to evaluate the effect of doxylamine, a first generation antihistamine, as a local analgesic agent by comparing its effect to bupivacaine., Methods: After blocking the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) by subcutaneous injection of doxylamine, we assessed doxylamine's cutaneous analgesic effect in rats. The dose-related effect and duration of doxylamine on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia were compared with that of bupivacaine., Results: We demonstrated that doxylamine, as well as the local anesthetic bupivacaine produced the cutaneous analgesic effects in a dose-related fashion. At the equipotent dose (50% effective doses (ED 50 )), the relative potency was bupivacaine (0.41 (0.36-0.48) mmol)> doxylamine (7.39 (6.91-7.91)mmol) (p<0.01). On an equipotent basis (ED 25 , ED 50 and ED 75 ), subcutaneous doxylamine resulted in greater duration of action (p<0.01) than bupivacaine at producing cutaneous analgesia., Conclusions: The result of this experiment indicated that doxylamine has the local anesthetic property less potent than bupivacaine, but its nociceptive block duration is longer than that of bupivacaine at an equianalgesic dose., (Copyright © 2017 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated the interaction of dopamine-proxymetacaine and dopamine- oxybuprocaine antinociception using isobolograms., Methods: This experiment uses subcutaneous drug (proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and dopamine) injections under the skin of the rat's back, thus simulating infiltration blocks. The dose-related antinociceptive curves of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine alone and in combination with dopamine were constructed, and then the antinociceptive interactions between the local anesthetic and dopamine were analyzed using isobolograms., Results: Subcutaneous proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and dopamine produced a sensory block to local skin pinpricks in a dose-dependent fashion. The rank order of potency was proxymetacaine (0.57 [0.52-0.63] μmol/kg) > oxybuprocaine (1.05 [0.96-1.15] μmol/kg) > dopamine (165 [154-177] μmol/kg; P < .01 for each comparison) based on the 50% effective dose values. On the equianesthetic basis (25% effective dose, 50% effective dose, and 75% effective dose), the nociceptive block duration of proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine was shorter than that of dopamine (P < .01). Oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine coinjected with dopamine elicited a synergistic antinociceptive effect and extended the duration of action., Conclusions: Oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine had a higher potency and provoked a shorter duration of sensory block compared with dopamine. The use of dopamine increased the quality and duration of skin antinociception caused by oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine.

Objectives: The objective of this experiment was to investigate spinal anaesthetic effects of pramoxine and its comparison with bupivacaine, a long-lasting local anaesthetic., Methods: After intrathecal injection, three neurobehavioural assessments, which consisted of nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block, were constructed in rats. The effects of bupivacaine and pramoxine (four doses of each drug) in a dose-related manner were conducted to obtain the ED 50 (50% effective dose). Pramoxine potency and duration at provoking spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block were compared with those of bupivacaine., Key Findings: We manifested that pramoxine provoked dose-relatedly spinal blockades of nociception, proprioception and motor function. Based on the ED 50 , the rank potency at producing spinal nociceptive, proprioceptive and motor block was bupivacaine (0.90 (0.82-1.02), 1.00 (0.92-1.08) and 1.16 (1.02-1.34) μmol/kg) greater (P < 0.01 for the differences) than pramoxine (15.47 (14.04-17.05), 16.46 (15.06-17.99), and 17.77 (16.48-19.15) μmol/kg). The spinal block duration created by bupivacaine was not predominantly different (P > 0.05 for the differences) from that created by pramoxine at the equipotent doses (ED 75 , ED 50 and ED 25 )., Conclusions: Our preclinical experiment indicated that pramoxine elicited a dose-related spinal block, was less potent than bupivacaine and had a similar duration of spinal block compared with bupivacaine., (© 2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.)

We aimed to investigate the local anesthetic properties of naloxone alone or as an adjunct for the local anesthetic lidocaine. After the block of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) with drugs delivery by subcutaneous infiltration, cutaneous nociceptive block was tested on the ratsꞌ backs. We demonstrated that naloxone, as well as lidocaine, elicited cutaneous analgesia dose-dependently. The relative potency in inducing cutaneous analgesia was lidocaine [22.6 (20.1 - 25.4) μmol/kg] > naloxone [43.2 (40.3 - 46.4) μmol/kg] (P < 0.05). On an equianesthetic basis [50% effective dose (ED 50 ), ED 25 , and ED 75 ], naloxone displayed a greater duration of cutaneous analgesic action than lidocaine (P < 0.01). Coadministration of lidocaine (ED 95 or ED 50 ) and ineffective-dose naloxone (13.3 μmol/kg) intensifies sensory block (P < 0.01) with prolonged duration of action (P < 0.001) compared with lidocaine (ED 95 or ED 50 ) alone or naloxone (13.3 μmol/kg) alone on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. The preclinical data showed that naloxone is less potent than lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic, but its analgesic duration was longer than that of lidocaine. Furthermore, naloxone prolongs lidocaine analgesia, acting synergistically for nociceptive block., (© 2017 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Background: The aim of this experiment was to investigate a long-lasting local anesthetic bupivacaine combined with serotonin at inducing cutaneous antinociception., Methods: The skin antinociception, characterized by an inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) following the pinprick on the dorsal skin of rats, was evaluated. The cutaneous antinociceptive effects of bupivacaine alone, serotonin alone, or bupivacaine co-injected with serotonin in a dose-dependent fashion were constructed, while the drug-drug interactions were evaluated by isobologram., Results: Subcutaneous serotonin, as well as the local anesthetic bupivacaine provoked dose-related cutaneous antinociception. On an equipotent basis (50% effective dose [ED 50 ]), the relative potency was bupivacaine (0.43 [0.37-0.50] μmol)>serotonin (1.27 [1.15-1.40] μmol) (p<0.01). At the equi-anesthetic doses (ED 75 , ED 50 and ED 25 ), the duration of bupivacaine was similar to that of serotonin at producing cutaneous antinociceptive effects. Co-administration of bupivacaine and serotonin displayed a synergistic antinociception., Conclusions: The preclinical data demonstrated that serotonin is less potent in eliciting cutaneous antinociceptive effects but has the similar duration of action, compared with bupivacaine. We also found a more significant depth of the sensory block with bupivacaine+serotonin than bupivacaine alone., (Copyright © 2017 Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this experiment was to investigate the interactions of the local anesthetic lidocaine combined with an agent (serotonin or dopamine) as infiltrative anesthetics., Methods: Cutaneous analgesia was characterized by the blockade of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex following 6 skin pinpricks on the rat back. Serotonin or dopamine at producing cutaneous analgesia in a dosage-dependent fashion was compared with lidocaine. Drug-drug interactions were calculated using the isobolographic analysis., Results: We revealed that serotonin, dopamine, and lidocaine provoked dose-related cutaneous analgesic effects. On the 50% effective dose basis, the rank of drugs' potency was found to be serotonin (1.70 [1.56-1.85] μmol) > lidocaine (5.18 [4.67-5.75] μmol) > dopamine (43.0 [40.9-45.2] μmol) (P < 0.01). At doses equivalent to their 25%, 50%, and 75% effective doses, serotonin or dopamine elicited a longer duration of action than lidocaine (P < 0.01) on producing cutaneous analgesia. Coadministration of serotonin or dopamine with lidocaine produced a synergistic effect., Conclusions: The preclinical data showed that serotonin and dopamine produce dose-related cutaneous analgesic effects as an infiltrative anesthetic. Serotonin has a better potency with a much longer duration of action compared with lidocaine at provoking cutaneous analgesia. Serotonin or dopamine as an adjuvant increases the quality of lidocaine in cutaneous analgesia.

Background: The aim of this experiment was to investigate the interaction between epinephrine and 2 local anesthetics (proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine) using subcutaneous injections under the hairy skin, thereby simulating infiltration blocks., Methods: Using a rat model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex in response to local skin pinpricks, the anesthetic properties of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine alone and in combination with epinephrine as an infiltrative anesthetic were tested. Isobolographic analysis was used for the analgesic interactions between adjuvant epinephrine and the local anesthetics. Lidocaine was used as a control group., Results: Oxybuprocaine, proxymetacaine, and lidocaine elicited a dose-dependent block to pinpricks. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, their relative potencies were proxymetacaine [0.126 (0.113-0.141) μmol] greater than oxybuprocaine [0.208 (0.192-0.226) μmol] greater than lidocaine [6.331 (5.662-7.079) μmol] (P < 0.01 for each comparison). On an equipotent basis (ED25, ED50, and ED75), sensory block duration elicited by oxybuprocaine or proxymetacaine was greater than that elicited by lidocaine (P < 0.01). Coadministration of proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, or lidocaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic analgesic effect and prolonged the cutaneous analgesic effect. After adding epinephrine, oxybuprocaine was much faster, reaching its maximal blockade, than proxymetacaine or lidocaine (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: We concluded that proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine were more potent and produced greater duration of nociceptive block than lidocaine. The use of epinephrine augmented the potency and prolonged the duration of proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic.

The main goal of the study was to investigate the interaction between bupivacaine and dopamine on local analgesia. After the blockade of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) responses, which occurred following the drugs were subcutaneously injected in rats, the cutaneous analgesic effect of dopamine in a dosage-dependent fashion was compared to that of bupivacaine. Drug-drug interactions were evaluated by isobolographic methods. We showed the dose-dependent effects of dopamine on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the rank of drug potency was bupivacaine (1.99 [1.92-2.09] μmol/kg) greater than dopamine (190 [181-203] μmol/kg) (P<0.01). At the equianalgesic doses (ED25, ED50, and ED75), dopamine elicited a similar duration of cutaneous analgesia compared with bupivacaine. The addition of dopamine to the bupivacaine solution exhibited a synergistic effect. Our pre-clinical data showed that dopamine produced a dose-dependent effect in producing cutaneous analgesia. When compared with bupivacaine, dopamine produced a lesser potency with a similar duration of cutaneous analgesia. Dopamine added to the bupivacaine preparation resulted in a synergistic analgesic effect., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate the local anesthetic effect of rimantadine in spinal anesthesia. Rimantadine in a dose-dependent fashion was constructed after intrathecally injecting the rats with four different doses. The potency and duration of rimantadine were compared with that of the local anesthetic lidocaine at producing spinal motor, nociceptive, and proprioceptive blockades. We demonstrated that intrathecal rimantadine dose-dependently produced spinal motor, nociceptive, and proprioceptive blockades. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the ranks of potencies at inducing spinal motor, nociceptive, and proprioceptive blockades was lidocaine>rimantadine (P<0.01). Rimantadine exhibited more nociceptive block (ED50) than motor block (P<0.05). At equi-anesthetic doses (ED25, ED50, and ED75), the spinal block duration produced by rimantadine was longer than that produced by lidocaine (P<0.01). Furthermore, rimantadine (26.52μmol/kg) prolonged the nociceptive nerve block more than the motor block (P<0.001). Our preclinical data showed that rimantadine, with a more sensory-selective action over motor block, was less potent than lidocaine. Rimantadine produced longer duration in spinal anesthesia when compared with lidocaine., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Clonidine prolongs duration of analgesia when used as an adjunct to local anesthetics for infiltrative cutaneous analgesia, and propranolol produces local anesthesia. The purpose of the experiment was to evaluate clonidine as an adjuvant for propranolol on the quality and duration of cutaneous analgesia. A rat model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) in response to local skin pinprick was employed to evaluate the cutaneous analgesic effect of propranolol combined with clonidine. The long-lasting local anesthetic bupivacaine was used as control. Cutaneous analgesia elicited by propranolol and bupivacaine was dose-dependent, and both propranolol (9.0μmol) and bupivacaine (1.8μmol) produced 100% nociceptive blockade. On an 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the relative potency was bupivacaine [0.48 (0.42-0.55) μmol] greater than propranolol [2.27 (1.98-2.54) μmol] (p<0.01). Subcutaneous saline and clonidine (0.12μmol) did not produce cutaneous analgesia. The mixture of an ineffective-dose clonidine (0.12μmol) and a drug (propranolol or bupivacaine) at ED50 or ED95 increased the potency and extended the duration at producing cutaneous analgesia. The resulting data demonstrated that propranolol is less potent than bupivacaine as an infiltrative anesthetic. Clonidine as an adjuvant for propranolol or bupivacaine has a significant peripheral action in increasing the depth and duration of action on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Although memantine blocks sodium currents and produces local skin anesthesia, spinal anesthesia with memantine is unknown. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the local anesthetic effect of memantine in spinal anesthesia and its comparison with a widely used local anesthetic lidocaine. After intrathecally injecting the rats with five doses of each drug, the dose-response curves of memantine and lidocaine were constructed. The potencies of the drugs and durations of spinal anesthetic effects on motor function, proprioception, and nociception were compared with those of lidocaine. We showed that memantine produced dose-dependent spinal blockades in motor function, proprioception, and nociception. On a 50% effective dose (ED50 ) basis, the rank of potency was lidocaine greater than memantine (P < 0.05 for the differences). At the equipotent doses (ED25 , ED50 , ED75 ), the block duration produced by memantine was longer than that produced by lidocaine (P < 0.05 for the differences). Memantine, but not lidocaine, displayed more sensory/nociceptive block than motor block. The preclinical data demonstrated that memantine is less potent than lidocaine, whereas memantine produces longer duration of spinal anesthesia than lidocaine. Memantine shows a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade., (© 2015 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

This study aimed to assess the local anesthetic effects of chlorpheniramine in spinal anesthesia and is compared with mepivacaine, a widely-used local anesthetic. Spinal anesthesia with chlorpheniramine and mepivacaine was constructed in a dosage-dependent fashion after the rats were injected intrathecally. The spinal block effect of chlorpheniramine in motor function, nociception, and proprioception was compared to that of mepivacaine. We revealed that intrathecal chlorpheniramine and mepivacaine exhibited a dose-dependent spinal block of motor function, nociception, and proprioception. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the ranks of potencies in motor function, nociception, and proprioception were chlorpheniramine>mepivacaine (P<0.01 for the differences). On the equianesthetic basis (ED25, ED50, ED75), the duration of spinal anesthesia with chlorpheniramine was greater than that of mepivacaine (P<0.01 for the differences). Instead of mepivacaine, chlorpheniramine produced a greater duration of sensory blockade than the motor blockade. These preclinical data showed that chlorpheniramine has a better sensory-selective action over motor block to produce more potent and long-lasting spinal anesthesia than mepivacaine., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The underlying mechanisms for the action of caramiphen used in local anesthesia are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the block of caramiphen on voltage-gated Na⁺ channels and in spinal anesthesia. We investigated the effect of caramiphen on voltage-gated sodium channels in differentiated neuronal NG108-15 cells as well as on rat motor function, proprioception, and pain behavior (when administered intrathecally). In in vitro experiments, lidocaine produced concentration- and state-dependent effects on tonic block of voltage-gated Na⁺ currents (IC₅₀ of 66.2 and 212.9 µM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Caramiphen exhibited a milder state-dependence of block (IC₅₀ of 52.1 and 99.5 µM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Lidocaine showed a much stronger frequency-dependence of block than caramiphen: with high frequency stimulation (3.33 Hz), 50 µM caramiphen elicited an additional 20% blockade, whereas the same concentration of lidocaine produced 50% more block. In in vivo experiments, caramiphen with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade was more potent than lidocaine (P<0.05) in spinal anesthesia. On an equipotent basis (25% effective dose (ED₂₅), ED₅₀, and ED₇₅), the duration of caramiphen at producing spinal anesthesia was longer than that of lidocaine (P<0.01). Our data revealed that caramiphen had a more potent, prolonged spinal blockade with a more sensory/nociceptive-selective action over motor blockade in comparison with lidocaine. Spinal anesthesia with caramiphen could be through the suppression of voltage-gated Na⁺ currents., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to estimate the local anesthetic effect of orphenadrine, an anti-muscarinic agent, in spinal anesthesia and its comparison with the local anesthetic lidocaine. After the rat was injected intrathecally, the spinal block of orphenadrine and lidocaine was constructed in a dosage-dependent fashion. The potency and duration of spinal anesthesia with orphenadrine were compared with that of lidocaine. Our data demonstrated that orphenadrine and lidocaine elicited dose-dependent spinal blockades on the motor function, sensory, and proprioception. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the ranks of potency in motor function, nociception, and proprioception were orphenadrine>lidocaine (P<0.01). At equipotent doses (ED25, ED50, ED75), the block duration elicited by orphenadrine was greater than that elicited by lidocaine (P<0.01). Orphenadrine, but not lidocaine, exhibited longer duration of nociceptive/sensory blockade than that of motor blockade at equipotent doses. Ineffective-dose orphenadrine as adjuvant did not enhance spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. The preclinical data revealed that orphenadrine with a more sensory-selective action over motor block exhibited more potent and longer spinal anesthesia when compared to lidocaine., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of epinephrine as additive for propranolol as an infiltrative anesthetic. Using a rat model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR), we tested the effect of co-administration of epinephrine with propranolol on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Bupivacaine, a long-lasting local anesthetic, was used as control. Subcutaneous propranolol and bupivacaine elicited a dose-dependent local anesthetic effect on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the relative potency was bupivacaine [2.05 (1.95-2.21) μmol/kg]>propranolol [9.21 (9.08-9.42) μmol/kg] (P<0.01 for each comparison). Subcutaneous epinephrine (0.012 μmol/kg) did not produce cutaneous analgesia. Mixtures of epinephrine (0.012 μmol/kg) with drugs (propranolol or bupivacaine) at ED50 or ED95, respectively, intensified and prolonged drug action on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Intraperitoneal injection of combined drugs (propranolol or bupivacaine) at ED95 with epinephrine (0.012 μmol/kg) exhibited no cutaneous analgesia. We concluded that propranolol was less potent but produced a similar duration of action when compared to bupivacaine on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Epinephrine as adjuvant for propranolol or bupivacaine enhanced the potency and extended the duration of action on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Although diphenhydramine has been shown to produce longer duration of spinal block than lidocaine, few studies disclose its skin infiltrative anesthesia when compared with a long-lasting local anesthetic, bupivacaine. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether diphenhydramine elicited cutaneous analgesia in comparison with bupivacaine. After inhibition of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex via subcutaneous injection of drugs in rats, we examined the local anesthetic effect of diphenhydramine and bupivacaine as infiltrative cutaneous analgesia in a dose-dependent fashion. We showed that diphenhydramine, as well as bupivacaine displayed a dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia in response to dorsal cutaneous noxious stimuli. The relative potency (50% effective dose) was bupivacaine (0.023 [0.013-0.035]%) > diphenhydramine (0.078 [0.068-0.091]%; P < 0.001). On an equipotent basis, diphenhydramine had a similar duration of action to bupivacaine. Neither local injection of saline nor intraperitoneal administration of a large dose of diphenhydramine or bupivacaine produced cutaneous analgesia (data not shown). We conclude that diphenhydramine is less potent than bupivacaine at producing cutaneous analgesia. At equipotent doses for infiltrative cutaneous analgesia, the duration of action of diphenhydramine is equal to that of bupivacaine., (© 2013 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2013 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of epinephrine as adjuvant for memantine or lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic. Using a rat model of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR), we evaluated the effects of adding epinephrine to memantine or lidocaine on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Lidocaine, a known local anesthetic, was used as control. We found that epinephrine, memantine, and lidocaine produced a dose-dependent local anesthetic effect as infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. On a 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the relative potencies were epinephrine [0.012 (0.006-0.020)μmol]>memantine [4.010 (3.311-4.988)μmol]>lidocaine [6.177 (5.333-7.218)μmol] (P<0.05 for each comparison). Mixtures of epinephrine (2.7nmol or 13.7nmol) with drugs (memantine or lidocaine) at ED50 or ED95, respectively, enhanced the potency and prolonged the duration of action on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Intraperitoneal injection of co-administration of drugs (memantine or lidocaine) at ED95 with epinephrine (13.7nmol) produced no cutaneous analgesia (data not shown). Epinephrine, memantine, and lidocaine were shown to have local anesthetic effects as infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Epinephrine increased the duration and potency of memantine and lidocaine as an infiltrative anesthetic., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to investigate infiltrative cutaneous anesthesia of 2-adamantanamine and rimantadine. After subcutaneous injections of drugs in rats, the blockade of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex by 2-adamantanamine and rimantadine was evaluated. Lidocaine, a common local anesthetic, was used as control. We showed that rimantadine and 2-adamantanamine as well as the local anesthetic lidocaine produced infiltrative anesthesia of skin in a dose-dependent fashion. Saline (vehicle) group displayed no cutaneous anesthesia. The relative potency of these drugs was rimantadine [23.8 (21.1-26.8)] = lidocaine [26.4 (22.7-30.6)] > 2-adamantanamine [64.6 (55.0-75.9)] (P < 0.01). On an equianesthetic basis [25% effective dose (ED25 ), ED50 , and ED75 ], rimantadine and 2-adamantanamine had longer duration of action than lidocaine (P < 0.05). Neither local injection of saline nor intraperitoneal administration of a large dose of drugs elicited cutaneous anesthesia (data not shown). These data demonstrated for the first time that rimantadine had a similar potent and longer duration of skin infiltrative anesthesia than did lidocaine, whereas 2-adamantanamine had a less potency but longer duration of cutaneous anesthesia than did lidocaine., (© 2012 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Although nisoxetine has been shown to elicit cutaneous (peripheral) anesthesia, spinal (central) anesthesia with nisoxetine was not exposed. The aim of this study was to examine spinal anesthesia of nisoxetine and its influence on the antinociceptive action of mepivacaine. We compared nisoxetine with an established local anesthetic mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia after rats were intrathecally injected with drugs. The drugs were spinally administered alone as well as in combination, and their potencies were compared via dose-response curves and isobolographic analysis. We showed that nisoxetine, as well as mepivacaine elicited spinal anesthesia in dose-dependent manners. On a 50% effective dose (ED₅₀) basis, the spinal block effect of nisoxetine in motor function, proprioception, and nociception [0.99 (0.91-1.10), 0.85 (0.76-0.95), 0.82 (0.74-0.89)] was more potent (P < 0.05) than that of mepivacaine [1.28 (1.21-1.34), 1.14 (1.07-1.22), 0.99 (0.93-1.05)], respectively. Furthermore, the nociceptive/sensory blockade (ED₅₀) was greater than the motor blockade in both nisoxetine and mepivacaine groups (P < 0.05). Saline group (vehicle) produced no spinal anesthesia. Coadministration of nisoxetine with mepivacaine displayed an additive effect. Our data reported nisoxetine produced significant anesthesia at spinal level, and additive interaction with the local anesthetic, mepivacaine. Intrathecal nisoxetine elicited more potent spinal anesthesia than mepivacaine., (© 2012 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Background: Although nisoxetine has been shown to elicit infiltrative cutaneous local anesthesia, the inhibition of voltage-gated Na(+) channels by nisoxetine has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nisoxetine on Na(+) currents and its efficacy on spinal anesthesia., Methods: In in vitro studies, the voltage-clamp method was employed to examine whether nisoxetine blocked Na(+) currents in mouse neuroblastoma N2A cells., Results: Mepivacaine showed concentration- and state-dependent effect on tonic blockade of voltage-gated Na(+) currents (IC50 of 3.7 and 74.2 μM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Nisoxetine was more potent (IC50 of 1.6 and 28.6 μM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). In in vivo studies, after rats were intrathecally injected with nisoxetine and mepivacaine, the dose-response curves were constructed. Nisoxetine acted like local anesthetic mepivacaine and induced spinal anesthesia with a more sensory-selective action (p < 0.05) over motor blockade in a dose-related fashion. Intrathecal 5% dextrose (vehicle) produced no spinal anesthesia. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, nisoxetine elicited more potent spinal anesthesia than did mepivacaine (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our results showed that nisoxetine displayed a more potent and prolonged spinal anesthesia with a more sensory/nociceptive-selective action over motor blockade, compared with mepivacaine. The local anesthetic effect of nisoxetine could be probably due to the suppression of Na(+) currents.

Flecainide, quinidine, and mexiletine have been shown to be sodium channel blockers and local anesthetics. The purpose of this study was to examine the interaction of the traditional local anesthetic bupivacaine with flecainide, quinidine, or mexiletine on spinal blockades. To obtain the 50% effective dose (ED(50)) of drugs, dose-dependent responses of spinal blockades of motor and sensory functions with intrathecal flecainide, quinidine, mexiletine, and bupivacaine in rats were constructed. Using a continuum of different fixed drug dose ratios, the interactions of bupivacaine with drugs (flecainide, quinidine, or mexiletine) were evaluated by an isobolographic analysis. Our resulting data showed that flecainide, quinidine, and mexiletine, as well as local anesthetic bupivacaine produced dose-dependent spinal blockades in motor function and nociception. Flecainide had the most potent spinal antinociceptive effect (P<0.01) among these three class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Co-administration of bupivacaine with flecainide, quinidine, or mexiletine displayed an additive effect on spinal blockades of motor function and nociception. We concluded that bupivacaine combined with flecainide, quinidine, or mexiletine exhibited an additive effect on spinal blockades of motor function and nociception. Using such a combination strategy to produce antinociception may potentially provide an improved therapeutic separation from myocardial toxicity occurred after spinal bupivacaine., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of the study is to find subcutaneous equianalgesic doses of memantine, amantadine and bupivacaine and use these doses to quantify the cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity of these agents after intravenous administration. Memantine, amantadine and bupivacaine, a local anesthetic, in a dose-related fashion were determined for cutaneous analgesia by a block of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex in rats, and equipotent doses were calculated. Following rapid intravenous infusion of equianalgesic bupivacaine, memantine, amantadine and saline (vehicle) in rats, we observed the onset time of seizure, apnea and impending death, and monitored mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Memantine and amantadine elicited dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia. At the 50% effective dose (ED(50)), the rank of potencies was bupivacaine [1.8 (1.7-2.0)]>memantine [19.1 (17.6-21.8)]>amantadine [36.1 (32.0-40.3)] (P<0.05). On ED(25), ED(50) and ED(75) basis, the duration caused by bupivacaine was similar to that caused by memantine or amantadine. At equianalgesic doses, the infusion time of memantine or amantadine required to induce seizure, impending death, and apnea was longer than that of bupivacaine during rapid intravenous infusion (P<0.01). The decreasing slope in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate was slower with memantine and amantadine when compared with bupivacaine at equivalent doses (P<0.01). Our data showed that memantine and amantadine (i) were equal to bupivacaine at producing durations of cutaneous analgesia but (ii) were less likely than bupivacaine to cause cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the cutaneous analgesic effect of propranolol and compare with a local anesthetic lidocaine. The potencies and equipotent doses were determined for infiltrative cutaneous analgesia on the rat back by determination of dose-response curves for propranolol and lidocaine. Propranolol as well as lidocaine elicited dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia. On a 50% effective dose (ED(50)) basis, the relative potency was propranolol (10.3 [8.9-11.9]μmolkg(-1))>lidocaine (25.8 [24.3-27.8]μmolkg(-1)) (P<0.01). On equianalgesic doses (ED(25), ED(50), ED(75)), propranolol produced longer action of infiltrative cutaneous analgesia than lidocaine (P<0.01). Coadministration of lidocaine (25.8μmolkg(-1)) and propranolol (1.7μmolkg(-1)) exhibited greater blockade and duration than lidocaine (25.8μmolkg(-1)) or propranolol (1.7μmolkg(-1)) alone. Propranolol displayed more potent and longer duration of action than lidocaine at producing cutaneous analgesia. Furthermore, propranolol may prove useful as an adjuvant for lidocaine in producing cutaneous analgesia., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Though promazine and chlorpromazine elicited cutaneous anesthesia, no study of spinal anesthesia with chlorpromazine and promazine has been reported. This study was to examine whether chlorpromazine and promazine produce spinal anesthesia. Using a rat model via intrathecal injection, we tested spinal blockades of motor function and nociception by promazine, chlorpromazine or bupivacaine, and so were dose-response studies and durations. We demonstrated that chlorpromazine and promazine elicited dose-dependent spinal blockades in motor function and nociception. On the 50% effective dose (ED(50)) basis, the rank of potency of these drugs was bupivacaine>promazine>chlorpromazine (P<0.05 for the differences). On an equipotent basis (25% effective dose [ED(25)], ED(50), and ED(75)), the block duration caused by chlorpromazine or promazine was longer than that caused by the long-lasting local anesthetic bupivacaine (P<0.01 for the differences). Chlorpromazine and promazine, as well as bupivacaine, showed longer duration of sensory block than that of motor block. Our data reported that intrathecal promazine and chlorpromazine with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade had less potent and longer-lasting spinal blockades when compared with bupivacaine., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the local anesthetic effect of nisoxetine as infiltrative cutaneous analgesic. After rats were injected subcutaneously with nisoxetine, dose-response curves were constructed. The cutaneous anesthetic effect of nisoxetine or MK-801 (dizocilpine) was compared with lidocaine, a traditional local anesthetic. We found that nisoxetine and MK-801 acted like lidocaine and elicited dose-related cutaneous (local) anesthesia. The relative potency was nisoxetine>MK-801>lidocaine (P<0.01) as infiltrative anesthesia of skin. On an equianesthetic doses (20% effective dose [ED₂₀], ED₅₀, and ED₈₀), nisoxetine produced longer action of cutaneous anesthesia than that of lidocaine or MK-801 (P<0.01). Coadministration of nisoxetine or lidocaine with MK-801 showed an additive cutaneous anesthesia. Neither local injection of a large dose of nisoxetine, MK-801 nor lidocaine in the thigh area produced cutaneous anesthesia (data not shown). In conclusion, nisoxetine had a local anesthetic effect as infiltrative cutaneous analgesia with durations of actions longer than that of lidocaine or MK-801. That N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors may not contribute to the cutaneous (local) anesthetic effect of nisoxetine or lidocaine., (© 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Caramiphen produces spinal anesthesia; caramiphen and carbetapentane have never been tested as infiltrative cutaneous analgesic. The aim of this study was to compare cutaneous analgesia of caramiphen and carbetapentane with bupivacaine and evaluated their central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity., Methods: After the blockade of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex with subcutaneous drug injections in rats, we evaluated the local anesthetic effect of carbetapentane and caramiphen on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. After continuous intravenous infusion of equipotent doses of bupivacaine, carbetapentane, caramiphen, and saline, we observed mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate and monitored the onset time of seizure, apnea, and impending death., Results: Carbetapentane and caramiphen acted like bupivacaine and elicited cutaneous analgesia in a dose-related fashion. On a 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, the ranks of potencies were bupivacaine (1.78 [1.52-2.07]) > carbetapentane (2.53 [2.38-2.77]) > caramiphen (3.60 [3.41-3.99]) (P < 0.01). At equianalgesic doses (ED25, ED50, ED75), the duration caused by carbetapentane or caramiphen was similar to that caused by bupivacaine. Under equipotent doses, the infusion time of carbetapentane or caramiphen required to cause seizure, apnea, and impending death was longer than that of bupivacaine (P < 0.05). The decline in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate was slower with carbetapentane or caramiphen when compared with bupivacaine (P < 0.01 for the differences) at equipotent doses., Conclusions: Carbetapentane and caramiphen were similar to bupivacaine at producing durations of cutaneous analgesia but were less likely than bupivacaine to induce central nervous system and cardiovascular systemic toxicity.

Although isoflurane, a non-water soluble agent, has been known to block Na+ currents, its spinal anesthetic effect was not exposed. The aim of this experiment was to evaluate the local anesthetic effect of isoflurane in spinal anesthesia. After intrathecal injection of isoflurane on rats, the spinal anesthetic effect in motor function, proprioception and nociception were evaluated. Lidocaine, a common used local anesthetic, was used as control. Isoflurane acted like lidocaine and produced dose-related spinal blockades of motor function, proprioception and nociception. Although isoflurane [27.6 (25.4-30.0)] had less potency when compared with lidocaine [1.0 (0.9-1.1)] (P<0.001) in spinal anesthesia, it caused a much longer duration of spinal blockades than lidocaine at equianesthetic doses (P<0.001). Our results showed that when compared with lidocaine, isoflurane produced a less potency but much longer duration in spinal anesthesia., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of the study was to evaluate co-administration of clonidine with oxybuprocaine (ester type), bupivacaine (amide type) or dextrorphan (non-ester or non-amide type) and to see whether it could have a peripheral action in enhancing local anesthesia on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia in rats. Cutaneous analgesia was evaluated by a block of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR) in response to local dorsal cutaneous noxious pinprick in rats. The analgesic effect of the addition of clonidine with oxybuprocaine, bupivacaine or dextrorphan by subcutaneous injection was evaluated. On an ED(50) basis, the rank of drug potency was oxybuprocaine>bupivacaine>dextrorphan (P<0.01). Mixtures of clonidine (0.12μmol) with oxybuprocaine, bupivacaine or dextrorphan (ED(50) or ED(95)) extended the duration of action and increased the potency on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Among these drugs, the addition of clonidine to bupivacaine (amide type) elicits the most effective cutaneous analgesia. Clonidine at the dose of 0.12 and 0.24μmol did not produce cutaneous analgesia. Oxybuprocaine showed more potent cutaneous analgesia than bupivacaine or dextrorphan in rats. Co-administration of oxybuprocaine, bupivacaine or dextrorphan with clonidine increased the potency and duration on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. The addition of clonidine to bupivacaine (amide type) elicits more effective cutaneous analgesia than oxybuprocaine (ester type) or dextrorphan (non-ester or non-amide type)., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Dextrorphan, a major metabolite of dextromethorphan, produces the duration of spinal and cutaneous anesthesia similar to bupivacaine. The purpose of this study was to test the central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity of bupivacaine, dextromethorphan, and dextrorphan., Methods: First, dose-response curves for dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, and bupivacaine (n = 8 at each testing point) were determined for cutaneous analgesia on the rat back, and equipotent doses were calculated. Next, during continuous intravenous infusion of equipotent doses of bupivacaine, dextromethorphan, and dextrorphan (n = 8 in each group), we observed the time to seizure, apnea, and complete cardiac arrest. A saline group (n = 7) was used for comparison. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO) were also monitored., Results: Bupivacaine, dextromethorphan, and dextrorphan produced dose-dependent cutaneous anesthesia. A longer duration of equipotent infusion doses was required to produce seizures in the dextromethorphan group (10.6 ± 1.3 min) than in the bupivacaine group (7.6 ± 2.1 min) (P = 0.005). Dextrorphan did not produce any seizures. Compared with bupivacaine, time to apnea and complete cardiac arrest was longer with dextrorphan (P < 0.001) and with dextromethorphan (P = 0.001). Cardiovascular collapse, defined as a decline in MAP, HR, CO, and SV, was slower in the dextromethorphan and dextrorphan groups than in the bupivacaine group (P < 0.001 for both comparisons)., Conclusion: At equipotent doses for local anesthesia, dextromethorphan and dextrorphan were less likely than bupivacaine to induce central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity.

The aim of this study evaluated the spinal anesthetic effect of verapamil and diltiazem. After rats were injected intrathecally with verapamil and diltiazem, dose-response curves were constructed. We evaluated the potency and duration of verapamil or diltiazem which compared with mepivacaine, a commonly used local anesthetic, in rats. Verapamil, diltiazem and mepivacaine produced a dose-dependent local anesthetic effect as spinal anesthesia. On a 50% effective dose (ED(50)) basis, the spinal anesthetic effect of verapamil was more potent than diltiazem or mepivacaine (P<0.01 for each comparison). On an equipotent basis (ED(25), ED(50), and ED(75)), the blockade duration of spinal anesthesia caused by diltiazem was longer than that caused by verapamil or mepivacaine (P<0.01 for each comparison). In summary, verapamil produced more potent spinal blockades, when compared with diltiazem or mepivacaine. Diltiazem demonstrated longer spinal blockades than did verapamil or mepivacaine., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of diphenidol on blocking Na(+) currents and spinal anesthesia. We used the patch-clamp method to examine if diphenidol blocked Na(+) currents. Lidocaine, a common used local anesthesia, was used as control. We also evaluated the potencies and durations of diphenidol and lidocaine on spinal blockades of motor function, proprioception, and nociception in rats. Lidocaine exhibited a concentration- and state-dependent effect on tonic blockade of voltage-gated Na(+) currents in mouse neuroblastoma N2A cells (IC(50) of 8.1 and 138.9 microM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Diphenidol was more potent (IC(50) of 0.77 and 62.6 microM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). However, unlike lidocaine, block of Na(+) currents by diphenidol lacked use-dependence. We also found that diphenidol acted like lidocaine and produced dose-related spinal blockades of motor function, proprioception and nociception. Although diphenidol had similar potencies of spinal anesthesia compared with lidocaine it produced a much longer duration of spinal blockades than lidocaine. Our results demonstrated that intrathecal diphenidol produced a long duration and similar potency on spinal anesthesia compared with lidocaine in rats. The anesthetic effect of diphenidol could be in part due to its blockade of Na(+) currents., ((c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Local anesthetics exert their anesthetic and analgesic effects by blocking the sodium channels in the nervous system. Phenothiazine-type antipsychotics also block sodium channels, but the local anesthetic characteristics of these drugs have not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cutaneous analgesic effect of phenothiazine-type antipsychotics., Methods: Using a subcutaneous injection model in rats, we tested the cutaneous analgesic effects of six phenothiazine-type antipsychotics (mesoridazine, promazine, chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, perphenazine and triflupromazine) at a dose of 0.6 mumol, and compared them with those of bupivacaine and lidocaine. A saline injection was used as the control., Results: All six phenothiazine-type antipsychotics elicited cutaneous analgesia. At the dose of 0.6 mumol, the potencies of mesoridazine and promazine were similar to that of bupivacaine; the other four drugs were less potent (p<0.001 for each comparison). Mesoridazine had a longer duration of action than bupivacaine (p<0.001). In terms of ED(50) values, mesoridazine was more potent and longer-acting than bupivacaine and lidocaine (p<0.01 for each comparison)., Conclusion: Of the antipsychotic drugs tested, mesoridazine is potentially the best candidate for development into a potent, long-acting local anesthetic. However, toxicity studies are needed before these agents can be used clinically as analgesics., (2010 Taiwan Society of Anesthesiologists. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aims of the study were to evaluate the spinal anesthetic effect of caramiphen and also assess spinal anesthetic interactions of caramiphen with lidocaine. Lidocaine, a common local anesthetic, was used as control. Dose-dependent responses of intrathecal caramiphen on spinal anesthesia were compared with lidocaine in rats. The interactions of caramiphen with lidocaine were evaluated via an isobolographic analysis. Caramiphen and lidocaine produced a dose-dependent local anesthetic effect as spinal anesthesia. On a 50% effective dose (ED(50)) basis, the spinal anesthetic effect of caramiphen was more potent than lidocaine (P<0.01 for each comparison). Co-administration of caramiphen with lidocaine produced an additive effect. Caramiphen and lidocaine are known to have local anesthetic effects as spinal anesthesia in rats. The spinal anesthetic effects of adding caramiphen to lidocaine are similar to the combinations of other anesthetics with lidocaine., ((c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine produce topical ocular and spinal anesthesia, they have never been tested as cutaneous anesthetics. We compared cutaneous analgesia of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine with bupivacaine and tested their central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity., Methods: After blockade of cutaneous trunci muscle reflex with subcutaneous injections, we evaluated the local anesthetic effect of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine on cutaneous analgesia in rats. After i.v. infusions of equipotent doses of oxybuprocaine, proxymetacaine, and bupivacaine, we observed the onset time of seizure, apnea, and impending death and monitored mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate., Results: Proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine acted like bupivacaine and produced dose-related cutaneous analgesia. On a 50% effective dose basis, the ranks of potencies were proxymetacaine > oxybuprocaine > bupivacaine (P < 0.01). Under equipotent doses, the infusion times of proxymetacaine or oxybuprocaine required to cause seizure, apnea, and impending death were longer than that of bupivacaine (P < 0.05). The decrease in mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate was slower with oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine compared with bupivacaine (P < 0.05 for the differences) at equipotent doses., Conclusions: Oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine were more potent at producing cutaneous anesthesia but were less potent than bupivacaine at producing central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity.

Proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine were clinically used for topical ocular anesthesia but never for spinal anesthesia, and therefore spinal anesthetic effects of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine were performed and compared with bupivacaine and lidocaine. After rats were injected intrathecally with proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, bupivacaine, and lidocane, dose-response curves were constructed. We evaluated the potencies (ED(50)) and durations (time to full recovery) of proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine on spinal blockades of motor function, proprioception, and nociception and compared with bupivacaine and lidocaine in rats. We found that proxymetacaine and oxybuprocaine acted like bupivacaine or lidocaine and produced dose-related spinal blockades of motor function, proprioception and nociception. On the ED(50) basis, the ranks of potencies in motor, proprioception, and nociception were proxymetacaine>oxybuprocaine>bupivacaine>lidocaine (P<0.01 for the differences). On an equipotent basis (ED(20), ED(50), ED(80)), oxybuprocaine and bupivacaine produced similarly longer spinal blockades than did proxymetacaine or lidocaine (P<0.05 for the differences). Intrathecal proxymetacaine, oxybuprocaine, and bupivacaine also produced longer sensory blockade than motor blockade. These data demonstrated that oxybuprocaine and proxymetacaine produced more potent spinal blockades, when compared with bupivacaine or lidocaine. Oxybuprocaine and bupivacaine with a more sensory-selective action over motor blockade produced longer spinal blockade than did proxymetacaine or lidocaine.

Background and Objectives: The aims of this study were to establish the potencies of epinephrine, bupivacaine, dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, and dextrorphan and evaluate interactions of epinephrine with bupivacaine, dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, or dextrorphan as an infiltrative anesthetic. Bupivacaine, a common and long-acting local anesthetic, was used as control., Methods: Dose-dependent responses of epinephrine, dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, and dextrorphan on cutaneous analgesia were compared with bupivacaine in rats. The interactions of drugs were evaluated via an isobolographic analysis., Results: We found that epinephrine, bupivacaine, dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, and dextrorphan produced a dose-dependent local anesthetic effect as infiltrative cutaneous analgesia. Relative potencies were epinephrine > bupivacaine > dextromethorphan > 3-methoxymorphinan > dextrorphan (P < .01 for each comparison). Coadministration of bupivacaine with epinephrine produced a synergistic effect, and coadministration of dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, or dextrorphan with epinephrine produced an additive effect., Conclusions: Epinephrine, dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, and dextrorphan are known to have local anesthetic effects as infiltrative cutaneous analgesia in rats. Epinephrine increased the potency of bupivacaine, but not dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, or dextrorphan as an infiltrative anesthetic. The cutaneous analgesic effects of adding epinephrine to dextromethorphan, 3-methoxymorphinan, or dextrorphan, are similar to combinations of 2 local anesthetics.

Dextromethorphan, an antitussive, has a complex pharmacologic profile and has not been well studied. Our aim was to evaluate whether dextromethorphan and its metabolites, dextrorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan, have a spinal anaesthetic effect. Using a method of spinal blockade in rats, we evaluated the potencies and durations of the effects of dextromethorphan and its metabolites on spinal blockades of motor function and nociception. Bupivacaine was the active control. We found that dextromethorphan and its metabolites produced a dose-related spinal blockade of motor function and nociception. On an ED(50) basis, the ranks of potencies were bupivacaine>dextrorphan>3-methoxymorphinan>dextromethorphan (p<0.05 for the differences). On an equipotent basis, dextrorphan and bupivacaine produced similarly longer nociceptive blockades than did dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan (p<0.05 for the differences). Co-administration of dextromethorphan or its metabolites with bupivacaine produced an additive effect. In conclusion, intrathecal injections of dextromethorphan or its metabolites, dextrorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan, produced dose-related spinal blockades of motor function and nociception. The suitability of these drugs as clinical spinal anaesthetics is worth further evaluation.

Background: Dextromethorphan blocks sodium channels, the site of action of local anesthetics. In this study we evaluated whether dextromethorphan has a local anesthetic effect., Methods: We administered dextromethorphan and its active metabolite--dextrorphan, and lidocaine subcutaneously to rats and tested them for cutaneous anesthesia. Drug-drug interactions and systemic safety indices (LD50s/ED50s) were also evaluated., Results: Dextromethorphan and dextrorphan had a local anesthetic effect after cutaneous infiltration. The ranking of potencies was dextromethorphan > dextrorphan > lidocaine (P < 0.01 for each comparison). A combination of dextromethorphan or dextrorphan with lidocaine produced an additive effect. Dextromethorphan and dextrorphan had 2.4- and 1.9-fold higher system safety indices than did lidocaine., Conclusion: Dextromethorphan and dextrorphan were more potent local anesthetics than lidocaine, but with higher systemic safety indices. Coadministration of dextromethorphan or dextrorphan with lidocaine produced an additive effect.

Background: Local anesthetics, when applied to nerves, produce reversible loss of sensation by blocking Na+ channels. Because all Class I antiarrhythmic drugs are Na+ channel blockers, theoretically, they may have local anesthetic effects. In this study, we sought to define the cutaneous local anesthetic actions of three Class I antiarrhythmic drugs., Methods: Using a subcutaneous infiltration model in rats, the potencies and durations of action of quinidine (Class IA), mexiletine (IB), and flecainide (IC) were determined and compared with the actions of lidocaine and bupivacaine. Saline injection was used as control., Results: Three Class I antiarrhythmic drugs produced a dose-related cutaneous analgesia with ranking of potencies of bupivacaine > flecainide > quinidine > mexiletine > lidocaine (P < 0.05 for the differences among drugs). On an equipotent basis, the ranking of durations of action was flecainide > quinidine and bupivacaine > mexiletine and lidocaine (P < 0.05 for the differences among drugs)., Conclusion: Three Class I antiarrhythmic drugs, quinidine (IA), mexiletine (IB), and flecainide (IC) have a local anesthetic effect on cutaneous analgesia.

Dextromethorphan has been used as an antitussive for more than 40 years and is considered a drug with a good margin of safety. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether dextromethorphan and its metabolites--3-methoxymorphinan and dextrorphan--had local anaesthetic effects. Using a method of sciatic nerve blockade in rats, the potencies and durations of actions of dextromethorphan and its metabolites on sciatic nerve blockades of motor function, proprioception, and nociception were evaluated. Lidocaine was used as control. We found that dextromethorphan and its metabolites produced dose-related local anaesthetic effects on sciatic nerve blockades of motor function, proprioception, and nociception. The ranks of potencies were lidocaine>dextromethorphan>3-methoxymorphinan>dextrorphan (P<0.01 for each comparison). Under an equi-potent basis, dextrorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan had durations of actions longer than that of lidocaine (P<0.05 for each comparison). Co-administration of dextromethorphan or its metabolites with lidocaine produced an additive effect on sciatic nerve blockades. In conclusion, dextromethorphan and its metabolites - 3-methoxymorphinan and dextrorphan- had a local anaesthetic effect on sciatic nerve blockades of motor function, proprioception and nociception with durations of actions longer than that of lidocaine. Co-administration of dextromethorphan and its metabolites produced an additive effect on sciatic nerve blockades.