Back to Search Start Over

Nisoxetine blocks sodium currents and elicits spinal anesthesia in rats.

Authors :
Leung YM
Chu CC
Kuo CS
Chen YW
Wang JJ
Source :
Pharmacological reports : PR [Pharmacol Rep] 2013; Vol. 65 (2), pp. 350-7.
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background: Although nisoxetine has been shown to elicit infiltrative cutaneous local anesthesia, the inhibition of voltage-gated Na(+) channels by nisoxetine has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nisoxetine on Na(+) currents and its efficacy on spinal anesthesia.<br />Methods: In in vitro studies, the voltage-clamp method was employed to examine whether nisoxetine blocked Na(+) currents in mouse neuroblastoma N2A cells.<br />Results: Mepivacaine showed concentration- and state-dependent effect on tonic blockade of voltage-gated Na(+) currents (IC50 of 3.7 and 74.2 μM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). Nisoxetine was more potent (IC50 of 1.6 and 28.6 μM at holding potentials of -70 and -100 mV, respectively). In in vivo studies, after rats were intrathecally injected with nisoxetine and mepivacaine, the dose-response curves were constructed. Nisoxetine acted like local anesthetic mepivacaine and induced spinal anesthesia with a more sensory-selective action (p < 0.05) over motor blockade in a dose-related fashion. Intrathecal 5% dextrose (vehicle) produced no spinal anesthesia. On the 50% effective dose (ED50) basis, nisoxetine elicited more potent spinal anesthesia than did mepivacaine (p < 0.05).<br />Conclusions: Our results showed that nisoxetine displayed a more potent and prolonged spinal anesthesia with a more sensory/nociceptive-selective action over motor blockade, compared with mepivacaine. The local anesthetic effect of nisoxetine could be probably due to the suppression of Na(+) currents.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2299-5684
Volume :
65
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pharmacological reports : PR
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23744419
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1734-1140(13)71010-7