Search

Background: The Republic of Congo adopted a new anti-malarial treatment policy in 2006, with artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as the first- and second-line anti-malarial drugs, respectively. Only three clinical studies had been conducted before the policy change. A randomized study on these two artemisinin-based combinations was conducted, and the effect that sickle cell trait may have on treatment outcomes was evaluated in children under 10 years old followed during 12 months in Brazzaville in 2010-2011., Methods: A cohort of 330 children under 10 years of age living in a suburban area in the south of Brazzaville were passively followed for registration of malaria episodes. Uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum episodes were randomly treated with co-formulated ASAQ (Coarsucam(®)) or AL (Coartem(®)). Patients were followed according to the 2009 World Health Organization protocol for the evaluation of anti-malarial drug efficacy. Plasmodium falciparum recrudescent isolates were compared to pre-treatment isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to distinguish between re-infection and recrudescence. PCR-uncorrected and PCR-corrected responses to treatment were determined using per protocol analysis. Haemoglobin type (AA, AS, SS) was determined by PCR., Results: Of 282 clinical malaria episodes registered during 1-year follow-up period, 262 children with uncomplicated malaria were treated with ASAQ (129 patients) or AL (133 patients). The PCR-corrected efficacy, expressed as the percentage of adequate clinical and parasitological response, was 97.0 % for ASAQ and 96.4 % for AL. Among ASAQ-treated patients, 112 (86.8 %) carried AA genotype and 17 (13.2 %) were AS carriers. The PCR-corrected efficacy was 96.4 % for AA-carriers and 100 % for AS-carriers treated with ASAQ [relative risk (RR) = 0.96; 95 % confidence interval, 0.93-1.00, p = 0.5]. Among 133 AL-treated children, 109 (82 %) carried AA, and 24 (18 %) AS genotypes. The PCR-corrected efficacy was 96.7 % among AA-carriers and 95.2 % among AS-carriers [RR = 1.01 (0.92-1.12), p = 0.6]. Nausea, jaundice, headache, dizziness, vomiting, pruritus, abdominal pain, and diarrhoea were registered as adverse events in both groups. ASAQ was associated with significantly more frequent adverse events (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: This first randomized study in Brazzaville confirmed the excellent efficacy of these co-formulated anti-malarial drugs in children. Sickle cell genotype did not influence the treatment efficacy of artemisinin-based combination therapy.

Background: Congo-Brazzaville adopted artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in 2006. Artesunate-amodiaquine (AS + AQ) and artemether-lumefantrine are the first-line and second-line anti-malarial drugs to treat uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria, respectively. The baseline efficacy of AS + AQ was evaluated from February to August 2005 in patients living in Brazzaville, the capital city of the Republic of Congo., Methods: One hundred and ninety-seven patients (96 ≤ 5 years old and 101 >5 years old, including adults) were recruited in a non-randomized study, treated under supervision with AS + AQ, and were followed up for 28 days in accordance with the 2003 World Health Organization protocol. Plasmodium falciparum recrudescent isolates from day 7 to day 28 were compared to pretreatment isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to distinguish between re-infection and recrudescence., Results: The overall efficacy of AS + AQ after PCR correction on day 28 was 94.4%. An adequate clinical and parasitological response was observed in 94.3% and 94.4% of children aged ≤ 5 years old and those aged >5 years old (including adults), respectively. The main reported adverse events were dizziness, vomiting, diarrhoea, pruritus, headache, anorexia, and abdominal pain., Conclusion: This study has shown the high efficacy of AS + AQ in Congolese patients of all ages with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria and serves as the baseline efficacy and tolerance of this ACT in Brazzaville.

Congo-Brazzaville has recently adopted artesunate-amodiaquine as the first-line antimalarial drug to replace chloroquine. Before the implementation of this new strategy, we conducted several clinical studies to assess the therapeutic efficacy of former, classical first-line antimalarial drugs in the city of Brazzaville, in which reside about 30% of the Congolese population. From 2003 to 2005, non-randomised trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (n=97 patients), amodiaquine (AQ) (n=62 patients), and the combination of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-amodiaquine (n=54 patients) in children aged between 6 months and 5 years with uncomplicated malaria using the 2003 WHO guidelines during the 28-day follow-up period. After excluding new infections by PCR, the proportion of treatment failure on day 28 was 30.2% (95% confidence interval, 19.2-43.0%) for sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, 34.8% (95% confidence interval, 21.4-50.2%) for amodiaquine, and 14.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.9-27.2%) for sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine+amodiaquine combination. Treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was associated with an increase of gametocyte charge. These results suggest that neither sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine nor amodiaquine is efficacious as monotherapy and that their combination may not remain effective in the coming years. Based on our results, the implementation of artemisinin-based combination therapy appears to be urgent in the country.

The availability of epidemiologic data on drug-resistant malaria based on a standardized clinical and parasitological protocol is a prerequisite for a rational therapeutic strategy to control malaria. As part of the surveillance program on the therapeutic efficacy of the first-line (chloroquine and amodiaquine) and second-line (sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) drugs for the management of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum infections, non-randomized studies were conducted in symptomatic children aged less than 10 years according to the World Health Organization protocol (14-day follow-up period) at 12 sentinel sites in Cameroon between 1999 and 2004. Of 1,407 children enrolled in the studies, 460, 444, and 503 were treated with chloroquine, amodiaquine, or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, respectively. Chloroquine treatment resulted in high failure rates (proportion of early and late failures, 48.6%). Amodiaquine was effective at all study sites (proportion of failures, 7.3%). Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine therapy was less effective than amodiaquine (P < 0.05), with failures observed in 9.9% of patients. Chloroquine is no longer a viable option and has been withdrawn from the official drug outlets in Cameroon. Amodiaquine and, to a lesser extent, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine monotherapies are still effective in Cameroon, but further development of resistance to these drugs should be delayed by the novel strategy using artemisinin-based combination therapy. Our findings indicate that amodiaquine is the most rational partner for artesunate. Studies on the efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine combination are currently being undertaken at several sites in the country.

Amodiaquine is one of the possible alternative therapeutic options to treat chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections in Africa. In this study, its efficacy to treat patients with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria and high parasitaemia (> or =5% of infected erythrocytes in the peripheral blood) was assessed by using the standard protocol developed by the World Health Organization. The mean pre-treatment parasitaemia was 10.8% (range, 5.0-35%). All 32 patients who completed the study (four lost to follow-up) had an adequate clinical and parasitological response on day 14. As compared with the pre-treatment parasitaemia, the mean parasitaemia decreased by 97.8% on day 2 (two patients with negative smears) and 99.97% on day 3 (22 patients with negative smears; the other ten patients had low residual parasitaemia ranging from 24 to 400 asexual parasites/microl). Our results suggest that, in areas of stable transmission in Africa, hyperparasitaemic patients with uncomplicated malaria can be safely treated with oral amodiaquine provided that their clinical and parasitological responses are closely monitored for the first 3 days and controlled on day 7 and 14.

In the absence of a firmly established gene responsible for chloroquine and amodiaquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum, surveillance of resistance to these first-line drugs in Cameroon needs to be performed by in vivo or in vitro tests for drug resistance. These 2 methodological approaches to define drug resistance were shown to be complementary and concordant in a majority of cases at our study sites, but discordant results may be observed in a few cases, probably as a result of acquired immunity and low plasma drug levels. To further examine the nature of recrudescent and persistent parasitemia after treatment with chloroquine or amodiaquine, the clinical response of children aged < 5 years, presumably with insufficient immune response, was assessed, and the in vitro response of the corresponding isolates was determined if treatment or parasitological failure occurred. Genotyping of pretreatment and posttreatment isolates was performed by polymerase chain reaction to distinguish between recrudescence and reinfection. Plasma drug levels were measured at the time of therapeutic failure by high-performance liquid chromatography. All cases of therapeutic or parasitological failure observed on or before Day 14 were due to the persistence or recrudescence of the original parasite populations present before treatment, with or without selection and appearance of new populations. Most parasites were characterized by elevated 50% inhibitory concentrations for chloroquine and amodiaquine at the time of clinical or parasitological failure. In some children, recrudescence was explained by the absence of drug in the plasma. The simultaneous analysis of clinical and in vitro responses, plasma drug level measurement, and genotyping may yield results that may explain the reasons for therapeutic failure, help establish the threshold level for in vitro resistance, and provide a set of more accurate tools to describe the epidemiology of drug-resistant P. falciparum while awaiting for the identification of the chloroquine and amodiaquine resistance gene or genes.

Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-amodiaquine combination for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in young children in Cameroon., Methods: In a randomized study we evaluated the effectiveness and tolerance of (i) sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (25 mg/kg body weight of sulfadoxine and 1.25 mg/kg of pyrimethamine in a single oral dose), (ii) amodiaquine (AQ) (30 mg/kg body weight in three divided daily doses), and (iii) the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-amodiaquine combination (SP+AQ) (same doses as in the other two treatment groups, given simultaneously on day 0) in young children in southern Cameroon. The parasitological and clinical responses were studied until day 28 in accordance with the modified 1996 WHO protocol for the evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of antimalarial drugs., Findings: Of 191 enrolled patients, 6 and 8 were excluded or lost to follow-up before day 14 and between day 14 and day 28, respectively. For the AQ-treated patients, parasitological and clinical evaluation on day 14 showed late treatment failure in 2 of 61 (3.3%) and adequate clinical response with parasitological failure in one (1.6%). There was an adequate clinical response in all patients treated with SP or SP+AQ. Therapeutic failure rates on day 28 were 13.6%, 10.2% and 0% in the SP, AQ, and SP+AQ groups, respectively. Anaemia improved in all three regimens. AQ produced faster fever clearance but was associated with more transient minor side-effects than SP. SP+AQ reduced the risk of recrudescence between day 14 and day 28 but increased the incidence of minor side-effects., Conclusion: SP+AQ can be recommended as a temporary means of slowing the spread of multidrug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum in Africa while the introduction of other combinations, including artemisinin derivatives, is awaited.

Background: In the Republic of Congo, previous epidemiological studies have only been conducted in the south of the country where it is most accessible. Nationally representative data on the efficacy of new anti-malarial tools are lacking in the country. As an initial step to close the gap, clinical efficacy of two artemisinin-based combinations, artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) and artemether-lumefantrine (AL), was assessed in Owando, a city in equatorial flooded forest in northern Republic of Congo. Methods: Under 12 years old febrile children attending public health facilities were screened for malaria parasites using lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for malaria and microscopic examination of thick blood films. Patients with at least 1,000 asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasites/µl of blood were clinically examined, included after informed consent, and followed up for 28 days, according to the 2009 World Health Organization protocol. Patients were randomly assigned to co-formulated ASAQ (Coarsucam®) or AL (Coartem®) treatment groups. Plasmodium falciparum recrudescent isolates were compared to pre-treatment isolates by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using msp1, msp2, and glurp genes to distinguish between re-infection and recrudescence. Results: Between November 2012 and February 2013, 857 under 12 years old febrile children were screened, of whom 198 (23.1 %) had positive RDT and 167 (19.5 %) positive thick films. ASAQ and AL efficacies were 92.7 and 94.2 % before PCR correction, respectively. After genotyping, the overall efficacy was 100 % for ASAQ and 98.0 % for AL. Conclusion: The data reported here represent partially the burden of malaria in 0-11 years old febrile children examined in public health centres of Owando city and serve as reference for further studies. Both artemisinin-based combinations were highly efficacious in patients under 12 years old with acute uncomplicated malaria. ASAQ was associated with more adverse events, which may reduce compliance in unsupervised treatment. Trial registration: ACTRN12612000940875 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]