Search

Memory recovery in amnestic animals is one of the most poorly studied processes. In this paper, we examine the role of protein synthesis and a reminder in the mechanisms of amnesia and memory recovery in grape snails trained to conditioned food aversion. Amnesia was induced by the impairment of memory reconsolidation using NMDA (N-methyl d-aspartate) glutamate receptor antagonists. In an early stage of amnesia (day 3), injections of protein synthesis inhibitors into animals combined with a reminder by a conditioned stimulus (CS) led to the recovery of aversive reactions to its presentation. Two types of changes in reactions to CS were revealed. In most animals, a persistent recovery of memory retrieval was found that lasted for at least 10 days. In other snails, aversive responses to CS persisted for 24 h. Isolated injections of inhibitors, injections of inhibitors and a reminder by the learning environment (without presenting a CS), usage of a differentiating stimulus instead of a CS, or inhibitor injections after the reminder did not affect the development of amnesia. The administration of protein synthesis inhibitors and a reminder in the late period after amnesia induction (10 days) did not affect its development or caused a short-term memory recovery. We suggest that amnesia is an active process that develops over time. The reminder induces the reactivation of the amnesia process dependent on protein synthesis, while the administration of protein synthesis inhibitors leads to the impairment of amnesia reactivation and recovery of the state formed before amnesia induction (i.e., recovery of conditioned food aversion memory)., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The peculiarities of implication of NMDA glutamate receptors and protein synthesis into the mechanisms responsible for impairment of memory reconsolidation were studied in edible snails conditioned to food aversion. Injections of NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists or protein synthesis inhibitor prior to reminding with conditioned food stimulus provoked development of amnesia after different latent periods. NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists gradually weakened the aversive reactions to conditioned stimulus presented in parallel with reminder during 1 h. The protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide provoked the development of amnesia only 2.5 h after the onset of reminding procedure. Combined injections of protein synthesis inhibitor and NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist prior to reminding completely prevented the development of amnesia. The data agree with hypothesis that memory reconsolidation and amnesia are distinct processes, which need activation of synthesis of specific proteins.

According to a common perspective, amnesia is a passive consequence of memory consolidation or reconsolidation impairment. The results of our own study, as well as literature data, allowed us to offer an interpretation of amnesia. Amnesia is an active process whose key characteristics are similar to those of other long-term plastic rearrangements of the brain, including learning processes. In accordance with this hypothesis, the review considers the data we obtained on the mechanisms of amnesia induction and development caused by impairment of conditioned food aversion memory consolidation or reconsolidation. In particular, experimental data indicating the dependence of amnesia induction on protein and RNA syntheses are described. After amnesia induction, a time-dependent reorganization of its processes is shown to occur. In early amnesia stages (< 10 days), a gradual decrease in the possibility of memory formation during a second training was observed. In late stages of amnesia (10 days or more), an unusual physiological phenomenon was revealed-the second training did not lead to the formation of long-term memory. This effect was specific, as memory for a new type of food could possibly be formed in these animals. The described properties of amnesia facilitate its characterization as specific anterograde amnesia. In addition, at an early but not late amnesia stages, reminder presentation caused amnesia reactivation, impairment of which by DNA methyltransferase inhibitors caused memory recovery. The results obtained allow us to characterize amnesia as a specific, time-dependent, separate process. In conclusion, the potential biological significance of the described type of amnesia is considered, and we discuss the possible molecular mechanisms underlying it., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Studies have shown that retrieval of long-term memory can cause memory reconsolidation, and impaired reconsolidation leads to amnesia development. However, the mechanisms of amnesia induction due to impaired memory reconsolidation remains poorly described. Using experiments involving grape snails trained to conditioned food aversion, we studied the role of translation and transcription processes and the role of serotonin receptors in the mechanisms of amnesia induction. We found that administration of a serotonin receptor antagonist or a protein synthesis inhibitor before the administration of a reminder using a conditioned food stimulus induced amnesia development, whereas injections of mRNA synthesis inhibitor did not affect memory safety. Moreover, combined injections of an antagonist of serotonin receptor and inhibitors of protein or mRNA synthesis before reminder administration completely prevented amnesia development. In addition, inhibitors of protein or mRNA synthesis prevented amnesia development 3 h but not 9 h after the administration of a serotonin receptor antagonist/reminder. We hypothesize that the mechanisms of amnesia induction caused by impaired memory reconsolidation depend on protein and mRNA syntheses within a certain time window, similar to the mechanisms of induction of other long-term plastic brain rearrangements., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We studied the involvement of protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ) in the mechanisms of amnesia development within 10 days after disruption of conditioned food aversion memory with ZIP (a PKMζ inhibitor). Repeated training performed in 3 days after amnesia induction with ZIP, led to the formation of conditioned food aversion memory, but the number of combined presentations of food and reinforcer stimuli was lower than during the initial training. Repeated training performed in 10 days after amnesia induction also led to memory formation, but the number of combined presentations of the stimuli was similar to that during the initial training. It was hypothesized that at the early stages of ZIP-induced amnesia, residual memory trace can be restored and amplified during repeated training, which led to memory expression at the behavioral level. At the late stages of amnesia, this memory trace was completely erased and repeated training led to the formation of a new memory. Thus, PKMζ inhibition results in the relatively fast impairment of memory retrieval and induces long-term process of memory erasing.

Experiments were performed on the snails trained in conditioned food aversion for 3 days. Injection of TDZD-8 (glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitor, 2 mg/kg) in combination with reminder (presentation of a conditioned food stimulus) led to memory impairment developing 3 days after inhibitor/reminder exposure and followed by spontaneous recovery in 10 days. Injections of TDZD-8 in a dose of 4 or 20 mg/kg before reminder were shown to cause amnesia that persisted for more than 10 days. Memory recovery during repeated training was observed at the earlier period than after initial training. The impairment of memory reconsolidation by TDZD-8 after training of snails for 1 day was less pronounced than under standard training conditions (3 days). The effect of a glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibitor during memory reconsolidation is probably followed by impairment of memory retrieval and/or partial loss, which can be compensated spontaneously or after repeated training.

The dynamics of amnesia development under conditions of memory reconsolidation disruption by serotonin receptor antagonist methiothepin or NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801 was studied in snails trained in conventional food aversion. In 2 days after training, injection of methiothepin or MK-801 before reminder induced amnesia development. During repeated training in 3 days after amnesia induction, the skill was formed more rapidly than during the initial training. During repeated training in 10 days after administration of methiothepin and reminder, the dynamics of habit formation was similar to that during initial learning. At the same time, repeated training in 10 days after MK-801 administration and reminder did not result in long-term memory formation. Disruption of reconsolidation of conditioned food aversion memory by antagonists of serotonin or NMDA glutamate receptors led to the development of different types of amnesia that had similar strengthening gradient at the early stages, but differed by the possibility of memory formation during re-training at the late stage.

The participation of DNA methylation processes in the mechanisms of anterograde and retrograde amnesia caused by impaired reconsolidation of conditioned food aversion memory by NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists or serotonin receptor antagonists, respectively, were studied on grape snails. Anterograde amnesia was characterized by impaired formation of long-term memory during repeated learning. Administration of a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor to amnestic animals resulted in accelerated formation of long-term memory during 1 day of repetitive training vs 3 days during initial training. In serotonin-dependent retrograde amnesia, repeated learning without DNMT inhibitor administration or after inhibitor injections led to the formation of long-term memory. The dynamics of memory formation was similar in both cases and did not differ from that during the initial training: the memory was formed within 3 days of training. Thus, epigenetic processes of DNA methylation are selectively involved in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia, but do not participate in the mechanisms of retrograde amnesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Re-exposure to elements of prior experiences can create opportunities for inducing amnesia for those events. The dominant theoretical framework posits that such re-exposure can result in memory destabilization, making the memory representation temporarily sensitive to disruption while it awaits reconsolidation. If true, such a mechanism that allows for memories to be permanently changed could have important implications for the treatment of several forms of psychopathology. However, there have been contradictory findings and elusive occurrences of replication failures within the "reconsolidation" field. Considering its potential relevance for clinical applications, the fact that this "hot" research area is being dominated by a single mechanistic theory, and the presence of unexplainable contradictory findings, we believe that it is both useful and timely to critically evaluate the reconsolidation framework. We discuss potential issues that may arise from how reconsolidation interference has typically been deducted from behavioral observations, and provide a principled assessment of reconsolidation theory that illustrates that the theory and its proposed boundary conditions are vaguely defined, which has made it close to impossible to refute reconsolidation theory. We advocate for caution, encouraging researchers not to blindly assume that a reconsolidation process must underlie their findings, and pointing out the risks of doing so. Finally, we suggest concrete theoretical and methodological advances that can promote a fruitful translation of reminder-dependent amnesia into clinical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The participation of DNA methylation and histone acetylation in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia and memory recovery was studied on grape snails trained in conditioned food aversion. Anterograde amnesia developed 10 days after memory reconsolidation impairment with an NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist and was characterized by long-term memory formation impairment upon repeated training. DNA methyltransferase inhibitor injections to snails 1 h before repeated training, as well as 15 min or 4 h after repeated training, caused rapid formation of memory that persisted for at least 10 days. Injections of histone deacetylase inhibitor before repeated training also induced the formation of a stable long-term memory. However, administration of histone deacetylase inhibitor 15 min after repeated training initiated a temporary memory recovery. Injections of the inhibitor 4 h after repeated training were ineffective. These results indicate that histone-dependent chromatin remodeling and DNA methylation are selectively involved in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia and memory recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Impairment of reconsolidation of conditioned food aversion memory led to the development of a specific anterograde amnesia: repeated training of amnestic snails did not induce long-term memory formation. DNA demethylation caused by injections of DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNAMT) during repeated training led to long-term memory formation. Injections of an NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist or a serotonin receptor antagonist prevented memory formation induced by administration of DNAMT inhibitor and repeated training. We hypothesize that methylation-dependent repression of neuronal genes underlies anterograde amnesia. Demethylation eliminated the blockade of these genes and created conditions for long-term memory formation, the induction mechanisms of which involve neurotransmitter receptors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied the involvement of NMDA glutamate receptors in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia. It was found that repeated training of amnestic animals treated with D-cycloserine, a potent agonist of the glycine site of NMDA receptors, did not lead to consolidation of long-term memory, while expression of short-term memory was more pronounced in comparison with control animals that received saline before repeated training. It was shown that D-cycloserine in amnestic snails did not affect the food reactions caused by the presentation of a conditioned stimulus during the reminder (without combination with the unconditioned stimulus). It is assumed that NMDA glutamate receptors in amnestic animals are involved in the neural plasticity mechanisms that underlie short-term memory, but their activation does not influence the anterograde amnesia processes and does not lead to the formation or recovery of long-term memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied the participation of DNA-methylation processes in the mechanisms of memory storage and reconsolidation, amnesia induction, and in recovery of the conditioned food aversion memory in edible snails. It was found that daily injections of DNA methyltransferases inhibitor over 3 days combined with a reminder of a conditioned food stimulus did not affect memory storage. The administration of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors did not suppress induction of amnesia caused the NMDA receptor antagonist/reminder. Injections of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors combined with the reminder led to memory recovery in 3 days after amnesia induction. Thus, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in the same doses did not affect storage and reconsolidation of memory, as well as the mechanisms of amnesia induction. At the same time, injections of inhibitors led to memory recovery, apparently, due to disruption of reactivation and amnesia development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Specificity of behavioral and neuronal mechanisms of impairment of long-term memory reconsolidation was studied in edible snails trained for associative skill of rejection of two types of food: raw carrots (conditioned stimulus 1) and apple (conditioned stimulus 2). In 2 days after training, the snails received protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide and a reminder (conditioned stimulus 1 or 2). In 3 and 14 days after cycloheximide/reminder, we observed the absence of aversive responses to the conditioned stimulus used as the reminder and preserved responses to the conditioned stimulus not used as the reminder. Moreover, we observed specific suppression of synaptic responses of command neurons of snail defensive behavior induced by the conditioned stimulus used as the reminder after cycloheximide injection and preserved synaptic responses of neurons to the other conditioned stimulus. It was hypothesized that protein synthesis-dependent synapse-specific plasticity of command neurons can be a mechanism of selective preservation of conditioned food aversion memory in snails. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study of the amnesia mechanisms is of both theoretical and practical importance. The mechanisms of anterograde amnesia are the least studied, due to the lack of an experimental model that allows studying this amnesia type molecular and cellular mechanisms. Previously, we found that conditional food aversion memory reconsolidation impairment in snails by NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists led to the amnesia induction, in the late stages of which (>10 days) repeated training did not cause long-term memory formation. In the same animals, long-term memory aversion to a new food type was formed. We characterized this amnesia as specific anterograde amnesia. In the present work we studied the role of epigenetic DNA methylation processes as well as protein and mRNA synthesis in the mechanisms of anterograde amnesia and memory recovery. DNMT methyltransferase inhibitors (iDNMT: zebularine, RG108 (N-Phthalyl-1-tryptophan), and 5-AZA (5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine)) were used to alter DNA methylation. It was found that in amnesic animals the iDNMT administration before or after shortened repeated training led to the rapid long-term conditional food aversion formation (Ebbinghaus saving effect). This result suggests that amnestic animals retain a latent memory, which is the basis for accelerated memory formation during repeated training. Protein synthesis inhibitors administration (cycloheximide) before or immediately after repeated training or administration of RNA synthesis inhibitor (actinomycin D) after repeated training prevented memory formation under iDNMT action. The earlier protein synthesis inhibitor effect suggests that the proteins required for memory formation are translated from the pre-existing, translationally repressed mRNAs. Thus, we have shown for the first time that the anterograde amnesia key mechanism is DNMT-dependent suppression of the transcription of genes involved in memory mechanisms. Inhibition of DNMT during repeated training reversed these genes expression blockade, opening access to them by transcription factors synthesized during training from the pre-existing mRNAs. • Memory reconsolidation impairment leads to anterograde amnesia development. • Retraining of amnestic grape snails did not induce long-term memory formation. • DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (iDNMT)+retraining induced memory formation. • The effect of iDNMT on memory formation depended on protein and RNA synthesis. • DNA methylation-dependent gene repression underlies the anterograde amnesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

1.25 mg/kg) given without a reminder two days after training were ineffective, while ZIP (2.5 mg/kg) evoked transient memory impairment one day after injection with spontaneous recovery on day 10. Injections of ZIP (5 mg/kg) without a reminder led to memory impairment and the development of stable amnesia. On repeat training of animals 11 days after induction of amnesia induced by ZIP (5 mg/kg), the number of combined food and reinforcement stimuli required to form the memory was similar to that in initial training. ZIP (5 and 10 mg/kg) combined with a reminder induced amnesia, though repeat training at 11 days led to dose-dependent increases in the rate of formation of memory than on initial training. It is suggested that in snails trained to conditioned food aversion, inhibition of a PKMzeta-like enzyme without a reminder induced 'fading of the memory trace,' while repeat training formed a new memory. PKMzeta is evidently not directly involved in the process of memory reconsolidation, though reminding prevented the amnestic effect of ZIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied the involvement of Mζ-like protein kinase (PKMζ) into mechanisms of conditioned food aversion memory reconsolidation in Helix lucorum. Injections PKMζ inhibitor ZIP in a dose of 5 mg/kg on day 2 or 10 after learning led to memory impairment and amnesia development. Injections of the inhibitor in doses of 1.5 or 2.5 mg/kg had no effect. Repeated training on day 11 after induction of amnesia resulted in the formation of memory on the same type of food aversion similar to first training. The number of combinations of conditional (food) and reinforcing (electrical shock) stimuli was similar during initial and repeated training. We hypothesize that the inhibition of Mζ-like protein kinase erases the memory trace and a new memory is formed during repeated training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The specific features of memory reconsolidation in edible snails were studied over 30 days after learning of conditioned food aversion. Injections of a NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist MK-801 or protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide in combination with the conditioned food stimulus (reminder) on day 2 after learning were followed by the development of amnesia. Repeated training on day 10 after the induction of amnesia did not result in skill formation. Injections of MK-801 or cycloheximide and reminder by the 10th day after training had no effect on memory retention. Injections of MK-801 or cycloheximide and reminder by the 30th day after training were followed by the development of amnesia. In these experiments, memory was recovered after repeated training. Our results indicate that a complex phase reorganization of memory occurs over 30 days after learning. This process includes memory consolidation over the first days after training, stabilization and resistance to adverse factors after 10 days, and newly acquired ability for reconsolidation by the 30th day after training. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied the role of DNA methylation in the mechanisms of amnesia in edible snails, which was induced by impairment of conditioned food aversion memory reconsolidation with NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist. The effects of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors were shown to depend on the stage of amnesia. At the early stage of amnesia (day 3 after induction), injections of methyltransferase inhibitors in combination with conditioned food stimulus (reminder) were followed by memory recovery. Application of inhibitors in the absence of the reminder was ineffective. Methyltransferase inhibitors were ineffective at the late stage of amnesia (day 10). Our results suggest that the presentation of reminding conditioned stimuli is followed by reactivation of amnesia. Methylation or demethylation of DNA in nerve cells serves as one of the key mechanisms for amnesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Learning interference leads to memory impairment. [•] Intra-hippocampal administration of choline modulates memory reconsolidation. [•] Choline reverses learning interference by enhancing memory reconsolidation. [•] Learning interference cause memory expression deficit, but not storage impairment. [•] Reconsolidation could modify the ability of a memory for being expressed later. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The effects of serotonin and glutamate receptor antagonists on conditioned food aversion memory reconsolidation were studied in experiments on edible snails. Injections of NMDA and AMPA glutamate receptor antagonists to trained snails before the reminder were found to induce the development of 'irreversible' amnesia: repeated training of these animals was not followed by memory formation. Administration of serotonin receptor antagonist before the reminder led to the development of 'reversible' amnesia, repeated training was followed by memory formation. The combined administration of serotonin receptor antagonist with NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists partially or completely abolished amnesia development. We hypothesized that that both memory reconsolidation and amnesia induction require integration of specific patterns converging to neurons and involving certain types of neurotransmitter receptors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Involvement of neurotransmitter receptors and translation and transcription processes in reconsolidation of conditioned food aversion memory was investigated in experiments on edible snails. Injections of neurotransmitter receptor antagonists and protein synthesis inhibitors before the reminder session were found to induce amnesia that was characterized by the possibility of memory recovery in repeated training and under the effect of mnemotropic agent D-cycloserine (early stage of amnesia) or by resistance to the mentioned actions (late stage). It has been shown that amnesia induction by memory reconsolidation impairment by neurotransmitter receptor antagonists depends on synthesis of specific proteins and mRNA, similar to the cases of induction of other adaptive brain modifications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Common snails previously trained to an associative skill consisting of refusing a defined foodstuff were used to study the effects of the ionotropic AMPA-kainate glutamate receptor antagonist DNQX, the serotonin receptor antagonist methiothepin, and the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide on long-term memory reconsolidation processes. DNQX and cycloheximide given 24 h after training and before a reminder procedure were found to lead to impairment of the reproduction of the acquired skill, which was not restored by retraining two weeks after initial training. The skill impaired after methiothepin and the reminder recovered on retraining. However, simultaneous injections of DNQX and cycloheximide or methiothepin and cycloheximide before the reminder produced no impairment to the skill. It is suggested that irreversible and reversible types of amnesia induced by AMPA-kainate glutamate receptor antagonists and serotonin antagonists respectively require the synthesis of specific protein molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ample evidence suggests that, when reactivated by a reminder, a consolidated memory may return to a labile state and needs to be stabilized again in order to persist, a process known as reconsolidation. In a previous study, performed in the crab Chasmagnathus, we found a dual role for the biogenic amine octopamine (OA) during memory consolidation. On the one hand, it was necessary for appetitive memory formation and, on the other, it had a deleterious effect on aversive memory consolidation. Thus, OA could be a good candidate to dissect the neurochemical mechanisms of appetitive and aversive reconsolidation. Here, we initially characterized the reconsolidation of an appetitive memory. Then, we compared appetitive reconsolidation with its aversive counterpart regarding the implication of OA in these processes, and contrasted them with previous findings obtained in the consolidation phase. Our results demonstrate that appetitive reconsolidation takes place when animals are re-exposed to the training context, as shown by the amnesic effect of cycloheximide when applied before the reminder. In addition, the no-reinforcement during the reminder is a necessary condition for appetitive reconsolidation to occur. Remarkably, appetitive reconsolidation is neither impaired by OA receptor antagonists nor facilitated by exogenous OA, whereas aversive reconsolidation can be interfered with by OA administration. Thus, our results indicate that appetitive reconsolidation does not involve OA signaling, while aversive reconsolidation is negatively modulated by OA. All in all, these results could constitute a step towards the identification of particular features of appetitive and aversive reconsolidation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies on common snails previously trained to an associative skill consisting of rejecting a defined foodstuff addressed the effects of NMDA glutamate receptor antagonists (MK-801 and APV) and protein synthesis inhibitors (cycloheximide and anisomycin) on long-term memory reconsolidation processes. Injections of each of the study compounds before the reminding procedure 24 h after training were found to lead to impairment of the reproduction of the acquired skill, which lasted at least three weeks. Repeat training of these animals to reject the same foodstuff as used in the initial training did not lead to acquisition of the skill. However, simultaneous injections of a protein synthesis inhibitor and an NMDA receptor antagonist (MK-801 + cycloheximide or APV + anisomycin) did not impair the skill. In subsequent experiments, snails received cycloheximide at different times after exposure to MK-801/reminding. Administration of cycloheximide 3 and 6 h after MK-801/reminding led to the development of incomplete amnesia and repeat training of the animals led to rapid restoration of memory. Administration of cycloheximide 9 h after MK-801/reminding evoked the development of stable amnesia characterized by impairment of skill formation on repeat training. We propose that the mechanisms of amnesia induced by the NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, by analogy with the mechanisms of other long-term adaptive rearrangements of the brain, depend on translation and can be suppressed by inhibitors of translation. The 'time window' for the dependence of amnesia induction processes on the synthesis of protein molecules was 6-9 h after exposure to MK-801/reminding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of MK-801, an antagonist to NMDA-glutamate receptors, on reconsolidation of olfactory discrimination task in rats and taste discrimination in edible snails was examined. Twenty-four hours after conditioning, the animals received a single systemic injection of MK-801 followed by a reminding conditional stimulus. Disturbances in retrieval of the acquired task were observed 10 days after injection followed by a reminding procedure. Repeated conditioning of these animals did not restore the task. Injection of MK-801 without reminding stimulation had no effect on task retention. Thus, disturbances of NMDA-dependent reconsolidation of the associative memory in animals of different taxonomic groups irreversibly eliminated long-term memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Although reconsolidation of memory after reminder does not seem to be the simple reiteration of the sequential stages occurring during memory consolidation, both phenomena probably employ similar mechanisms including activation of glutamate receptors and protein synthesis. It is known that group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are involved in memory consolidation and modulation of protein synthesis. The aim of present study was to investigate the role of mGluR5 in memory consolidation and reconsolidation and to determine whether inhibition of these receptors may affect protein synthesis in these processes. The one-trial passive avoidance task on chicks was used as the experimental model of learning. Injection of the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP into a specific chick brain region IMM resulted in amnesia, provided the injection was made either shortly before or after training, or approximately 4h after training. This amnesia was permanent, resembling the effects of protein synthesis inhibitors. MPEP injection immediately after reminder resulted in only a transient amnesia revealed 1h later. Increased expression of Zif/268 and c-Fos proteins 2h after initial training was abolished bilaterally in chicks injected with MPEP. Injection of MPEP immediately after reminder did not inhibit c-Fos and Zif/268 expression, on the contrary, their expression was increased, specifically in left IMM and was similar to that observed after initial training. These results show that at least in the chick model mGluR5 play an important role in both consolidation and reconsolidation of memory but the mechanisms triggered by their activation in these processes differ. It is suggested that Ca2+ signal derived from mGluR5 stimulation is necessary for complete memory consolidation, whereas during reconsolidation other mGluR5 triggered mechanisms of protein synthesis activation and regulation may be involved. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Memory traces, once established, are no longer sensitive to disruption by metabolic inhibitors. However, memories reactivated by reminder are once again vulnerable, in a time-dependent manner, to amnestic treatment. To determine whether the metabolic events following a reminder recapitulate those following initial training we examined the temporal dynamics of amnesia induced by the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin and the glycosylation inhibitor 2-deoxygalactose. The effects of both were transient and dependent on time of reminder post-training and time of injection relative to reminder, and differed from those following initial training. 2-[14C]-deoxyglucose uptake increased in two brain regions, the intermediate medial hyperstriatum ventrale (IMHV) and lobus parolfactorius (LPO) following reminder as it did following training, but the increase was bilateral rather than confined to the left hemisphere and was more marked in LPO than IMHV. C-fos expression after reminder was increased only in the LPO, the chick brain region associated with a late phase of memory processing and recall. Thus although, like initial consolidation, memory processing after reminder is sensitive to inhibitors of protein synthesis and glycosylation, the temporal and pharmacological dynamics indicate differences between these two processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Memories remain dynamic after consolidation, and when reactivated, they can be rendered vulnerable to various pharmacological agents that disrupt the later expression of memory (i.e., amnesia). Such drug-induced post-reactivation amnesia has traditionally been studied in AAA experimental designs, where a memory is initially created for a stimulus A (be it a singular cue or a context) and later reactivated and tested through exposure to the exact same stimulus. Using a contextual fear conditioning procedure in rats and midazolam as amnestic agent, we recently demonstrated that drug-induced amnesia can also be obtained when memories are reactivated through exposure to a generalization stimulus (GS, context B) and later tested for that same generalization stimulus (ABB design). However, this amnestic intervention leaves fear expression intact when at test animals are instead presented with the original training stimulus (ABA design) or a novel generalization stimulus (ABC design). The underlying mechanisms of post-reactivation memory malleability and of MDZ-induced amnesia for a generalization context remain largely unknown. Here, we evaluated whether, like typical CS-mediated (or AAA) post-reactivation amnesia, GS-mediated (ABB) post-reactivation amnesia displays key features of a destabilization-based phenomenon. We first show that ABB post-reactivation amnesia is critically dependent on prediction error at the time of memory reactivation and provide evidence for its temporally graded nature. In line with the known role of GluN2B-NMDA receptor activation in memory destabilization, we further demonstrate that pre-reactivation administration of ifenprodil, a selective antagonist of GluN2B-NMDA receptors, prevents MDZ-induced ABB amnesia. In sum, our data reveal that ABB MDZ-induced post-reactivation amnesia exhibits the hallmark features of a destabilization-dependent phenomenon. Implication of our findings for a reconsolidation-based account of post-reactivation amnesia are discussed. • MDZ after exposure to a generalization context induces amnesia for contextual fear. • Such amnesia does not generalize to the original training context or a new context. • Yet we show it displays hallmark features of a destabilization-dependent phenomenon. • Our results challenge a reconsolidation blockade account of post-retrieval amnesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]