Search

Purpose: Secondary hip osteoarthritis after acetabular fractures requiring total arthroplasty (THA) poses a huge burden on the affected patients as well as health systems. The present study aimed to assess risk factors associated with THA after acetabular fractures based on the data from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry., Methods: Retrospective analysis of 678 acetabular fracture cases without concomitant pelvic ring fracture treated and followed-up between January 2004 and May 2015 at six large trauma centres. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed assessing the association of patient/treatment characteristics with THA likelihood at an average follow-up of 2.7 years (range 0.4-9.5 years; SD 1.8 years)., Results: Overall, the rate of secondary osteoarthritis was 19.8%. The likelihood for THA increased with 6% per age year (95% CI 1.04-1.09) and with 21% per millimetre subluxation (95%CI 1.09-1.33). This likelihood was 3.54 (95% CI 1.77-7.08) and 3.68 times (95% CI 1.87-7.47) higher if the posterior wall was involved and a contusion and/or impaction of the femoral head was present. Other covariates (sex, ISS, trauma type, AO/OTA and Letournel classification, initial displacement, surgical approach, intra-articular fragments, contusion and/or impaction to the acetabulum, reduction, intervention type, duration of surgery, soft tissue damage, residual fracture step/gap, and prevention of heterotopic ossifications) were not significantly associated (p > 0.15)., Conclusions: Twenty percent of patients with acetabular fractures require THA. The associated risk factors are patient age, femoral head lesion/subluxation, and involvement of the posterior wall. The identified risk factors support previous research and should be minded when treatment of acetabular fractures is planned.

Objectives: Anatomical acetabular plates the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIP) were recently introduced to fix acetabular fractures through the intrapelvic approach. Therefore, we asked the following: (1) Does the preshaped 3-dimensional suprapectineal plate interfere with or even impair the fracture reduction quality? (2) How often does the AIP approach need to be extended by the first (lateral) window of the ilioinguinal approach?, Design: Observational case series., Setting: Two Level 1 trauma centers., Patients/participants: Patients with unstable acetabular fractures in 2014., Intervention: Fracture fixation with anatomical-preshaped, 3-dimensional suprapectineal plates through the AIP approach ± the first window of the ilioinguinal approach., Outcome Measurements: Fracture reduction results were measured in computed tomography scans and graded according to the Matta quality of reduction. Intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications were recorded. Radiological results (according to Matta) and functional outcome (modified Merle d'Aubigné score) were evaluated at 1-year follow-up., Results: Thirty patients (9 women + 21 men; mean age ± SE: 64 ± 8 years) were included. The intrapelvic approach was solely used in 19 cases, and in 11 cases, an additional extension with the first window of the ilioinguinal approach (preferential for 2-column fractures) was performed. The mean operating time was 202 ± 59 minutes; the fluoroscopic time was 66 ± 48 seconds. Fracture gaps and steps in preoperative versus postoperative computed tomography scans were 12.4 ± 9.8 versus 2.0 ± 1.5 and 6.0 ± 5.5 versus 1.3 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. At 13.4 ± 2.9 months follow-up, the Matta grading was excellent in 50%, good in 25%, fair in 11%, and poor in 14% of cases. The modified Merle d'Aubigné score was excellent in 17%, good in 37%, fair in 33%, and poor in 13% of cases., Conclusion: The AIP approach using approach-specific instruments and an anatomical-preshaped, 3-dimensional suprapectineal plate became the standard procedure in our departments. Radiological and functional early results justify joint preserving surgery in most cases., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: An infraacetabular screw path facilitates the closure of a periacetabular fixation frame to increase the plate fixation strength in acetabular fractures up to 50%. Knowledge of the variance in corridor sizes and axes has substantial surgical relevance for safe screw placement., Questions/purposes: (1) What proportion of healthy pelvis specimens have an infraacetabular corridor that is 5 mm or larger in diameter? (2) Does a universal corridor axis and specific screw entry point exist? (3) Are there sex-specific differences in the infraacetabular corridor size or axis and are these correlated with anthropometric parameters like age, body weight and height, or the acetabular diameter?, Methods: A template pelvis with a mean shape from 523 segmented pelvis specimens was generated using a CT-based advanced image analyzing system. Each individual pelvis was registered to the template using a free-form registration algorithm. Feasible surface regions for the entry and exit points of the infraacetabular corridor were marked on the template and automatically mapped to the individual samples to perform a measurement of the maximum sizes and axes of the infraacetabular corridor on each specimen. A minimum corridor diameter of at least 5 mm was defined as a cutoff for placing a 3.5-mm cortical screw in clinical settings., Results: In 484 of 523 pelves (93%), an infraacetabular corridor with a diameter of at least 5 mm was found. Using the mean axis angulations (54.8° [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.6] from anterocranial to posterocaudal in relation to the anterior pelvic plane and 1.5° [95% CI, 0.4] from anteromedial to posterolateral in relation to the sagittal midline plane), a sufficient osseous corridor was present in 64% of pelves. Allowing adjustment of the three-dimensional axis by another 5° included an additional 25% of pelves. All corridor parameters were different between females and males (corridor diameter, 6.9 [95% CI, 0.2] versus 7.7 [95% CI, 0.2] mm; p<0.001; corridor length, 96.2 [95% CI, 0.7] versus 106.4 [95% CI, 0.6] mm; p<0.001; anterior pelvic plane angle, 54.0° [95% CI, 0.9] versus 55.3° [95% CI, 0.8]; p<0.01; sagittal midline plane angle, 4.3° [95% CI, 0.6] versus -0.3° [95% CI, 0.5]; p<0.001)., Conclusion: This study provided reference values for placement of a 3.5-mm cortical screw in the infraacetabular osseous corridor in 90% of female and 94% of male pelves. Based on the sex-related differences in corridor axes, the mean screw trajectory is approximately parallel to the sagittal midline plane in males but has to be tilted from medial to lateral in females. Considering the narrow corridor diameters, we suggest an individual preoperative CT scan analysis for fine adjustments in each patient.

Objectives: Screw navigation techniques with different image guidance [2-dimensional (2D) vs. 3-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy] were evaluated for acetabular fracture surgery., Methods: Two-dimensional and 3D navigation images were analyzed for visualization of different osseous corridors: supra-acetabular, anterior column, posterior column, and infra-acetabular. Forty guide wires per group were placed in synthetic pelvis with a prefabricated soft tissue envelope (10 per group) using a 2D or 3D fluoroscopic navigation procedure. Duration of the single steps for each procedure and of cumulative fluoroscopy time was measured. The accuracy of guide wire placement was evaluated visually and in 3D cone-beam scans., Results: The overall procedure time per pelvis was significantly reduced in the 3D group compared with the 2D group [mean ± standard error (SE) (minutes): 50.11 ± 1.38 vs. 63.42 ± 2.32; P < 0.0001]. A trend to reduction in image acquisition time [mean ± SE (minutes): 12.37 ± 1.34 vs. 15.43 ± 1.03; P = not significant] and significant increase in the cumulative fluoroscopy time [mean ± SE (seconds): 64 ± 9 vs. 13 ± 1.3; P < 0.0001) was measured in the 3D compared with the 2D group, caused by the 3D scan. Intra-articular misplacements were not observed in both the groups, but an increased accuracy could be achieved using the 3D image-based navigation procedure (perfect placement: 37 vs. 29; secure placement: 2 vs. 7; misplacement: 1 vs. 4)., Conclusions: Both navigation procedures securely prevent an intra-articular penetration during drilling, but the 3D image-based navigation procedure increases the overall accuracy compared with the 2D image-based navigation technique (misplacement rates of 2.5% vs. 10%). Especially, in very narrow corridors (as the infra-acetabular screw path), the use of 3D navigation should be preferred.

Background: The standard for operative treatment of acetabular fractures is open reduction and plate fixation. Recently, screw fixation-only methods through less invasive approaches are reported, but biomechanical data are missing. Questions posed in this study are (1) is the static fixation strength of different screw types equivalent to the standard plate fixation for anterior column fractures of the acetabulum? and (2) does the placement of an additional screw in the infra-acetabular corridor increase the fixation strength independent of the used implant?, Methods: Three groups of different screws (group II, titanium; group III, stainless steel; and group IV, biodegradable Poly-L-Lactid) were compared with the standard plate fixation (group I) in Synbone pelves with custom-made anterior column fractures. Six pelvises per group were axial loaded with six cycles of 800 N, twice with and without an additional placed infra-acetabular screw., Results: The fixation strength of titanium screws was equivalent to the standard plate fixation. The stainless steel and Poly-L-Lactid screw fixation strengths were equivalent to each other but inferior to the aforementioned. The additional placement of an infra-acetabular screw significantly increased the fracture fixation strength, independent of the used implant., Conclusion: Screw fixation is a promising alternative approach for the stabilization of noncomminuted acetabular fractures of the anterior column with equivalent fixation strength to the standard plate fixation. The additional placement of an infra-acetabular screw significantly increases the fracture fixation independent of the used implant and should be considered for acetabular fractures with separation of both columns., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, level IV., (Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.)

Introduction: The aim of this study was the direct comparison of the static fixation strength of two common plate systems: MPS (Matta Pelvic System) and LPPS (Low Profile Plate System). Furthermore the role of a modified screw placement with addressing the infra-acetabular corridor and the use of locking screws were evaluated., Materials and Methods: Custom made anterior column fractures in artificial SYNBONE pelves were fixed with different acetabular plates (group I: MPS, group II: LPPS none locking and group III: LPPS locking). Each pelvis was tested twice, with the additionally placed infra-acetabular lag screw [+] first, followed by a repeated measurement without the infra-acetabular screw [-]. Six pelves per group were tested under static loading with six cycles up to 800N, each. The fracture displacement was measured in the weight bearing dome using an ultrasound based Zebris-3D-Motion Analyzer., Results: The MPS-plate had a less fixation strength compared to the LPPS-plate (mean±SD of maximum fracture displacement [mm] in group I vs. group II=0.63±0.02 vs. 0.37±0.02, p<0.05). The locking feature did not increase the fracture fixation strength (mean±SD of maximum fracture displacement [mm] in group II vs. group III: 0.37±0.02 vs. 0.37±0.03; ns). The infra-acetabular screw significantly reduces the maximum fracture displacement in all groups, independent of the plate systems ([Delta%] in group I=50; group II=63 and group III=40; p<0.05 each)., Conclusion: The LPPS-plate performed superior fixation strength for anterior column fractures compared to the MPS-plate. The locking plate modality did not reduce the maximum fracture displacement, whereas the additional infra-acetabular screw placement actually doubles the fracture fixation strength independent of the used plate system., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Periprosthetic fractures are severe complications of total hip arthroplasty with increasing incidence. Most fractures are localized around the femoral component of prosthesis, whereas periacetabular fractures are rare and their management is difficult. In most cases, an operative procedure with revision and exchange of the acetabular cup is necessary. The approaches are demanding and an increased risk of complications is reported. We present the case of a female patient with a cementless total hip arthroplasty due to severe arthritis, suffering of an infratectal transverse periprosthetic fracture. After an initial conservative treatment attempt, we performed a minimally invasive screw fixation using navigated 2-dimensional fluoroscopic guidance. In this report, the literature for treatment recommendations is reviewed and the chosen navigation technique discussed., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Epidemiological, clinical and radiological data of 1266 patients with a unilateral acetabular fracture of up to 29 hospitals was reviewed. Three time periods, 1991-1993 (Registry I; n=359), 1998-2000 (Registry II; n=503), and 2005-2006 (Registry III; n=404) were compared with regard to injury pattern and severity, fracture type, and chosen nonoperative vs. operative treatment to elucidate changes over time in the treatment of acetabular fractures. In the operatively treated group, time to operation, surgical approach, fracture fixation implants and fracture reduction quality were examined. 641 (50.6%) patients with isolated acetabular fractures, 410 (32.4%) multiple injured and 215 (17.0%) polytrauma patients with 642 (50.7%) simple and 624 (49.3%) associated acetabular fractures were evaluated. In the time period from 1991 to 2006, the rate of operative treatments increased nationwide to 77% (rho<0.001). The distribution of fracture types involving the anterior and posterior wall changed with age (rho<0.001). Across all registries, 583 (68.0%) operations were performed within 7 days, 212 (24.7%) operations between 7 and 14 days and 54 (6.3%) operations were performed later than 14 days after injury. An anatomical reduction (0-1mm displacement) was achieved in 551 (64%) acetabular fractures. The obtained reduction quality did not correlate with time to operation, was lower in associated than in simple fracture types, and also lower in patients with isolated acetabular fractures than in polytrauma patients. Most importantly, the fracture reduction quality did not improve over time despite a higher frequency of surgical interventions. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was preferred in the nineties in nearly three quarters of all operative procedures. Currently, the Kocher-Langenbeck and the ilioinguinal approaches are used equally often. The fracture fixation did not change over time and is achieved in 51% with plates in combination with single screws. This multisurgeon series illustrates a nationwide performance in acetabular fracture management. Despite changes in the chosen approaches and an increased surgical frequency, the operative treatment of acetabular fractures of the last 15 years did not lead to an increased reduction quality. Therefore, the rarity and complexity of acetabular fractures demands further specific teaching by experienced acetabular surgeons, scientific research and clinical outcome evaluation., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The current gold standard for operatively treated acetabular fractures is open reduction and internal fixation. In this study we report the early results of percutaneous screw osteosynthesis of acetabular fractures in 14 cases, using a computer navigation system to reduce screw misplacement, approach associated risks and radiation exposure., Results: All 36 acetabular screws were placed correctly without any perioperative complication. The mean operation time per screw was 54 min, the mean fluoroscopic time per screw was 87 s. In the follow-up examinations (current rate: 71 %, mean follow-up: 13.1 +/- 1.8 months) no fixation failure or development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis was seen. One wound infection occured., Conclusion: Our first experience with this novel approach is promising and serious advances of fluoroscopic navigated percutaneous screw osteosynthesis of well selected acetabular fractures can be expected.