Search

Background: Endothelial dysfunction is an early phase of atherosclerosis and causes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but the cutoff reactive hyperemia index (RHI) for identifying ASCVD patients under treatment for lifestyle diseases is unknown. Methods: Patients who visited Cardiology Section, Izumi General Medical Center, Kagoshima, Japan and were measured RHI using Endo-PAT 2000 during May 2014 and March 2016 were enrolled. We divided them into ASCVD and non-ASCVD groups and investigated the association with RHI between the groups. Results: ASCVD group included 195 patients and non-ASCVD group included 288 patients. Age, body mass index and the rate of male, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and chronic kidney disease in the ASCVD group were significantly higher than those in non-ASCVD group. RHI in the ASCVD group (1.65 (1.40 - 1.92)) was significantly lower than that in the non-ASCVD group (1.73 (1.45 - 2.24)) (P < 0.05). In multi-regression analysis, RHI (odds ratio: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.45 - 0.99, P = 0.04) was independently associated with ASCVD after adjusted by age, sex, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and chronic kidney disease. The cutoff RHI value between the groups was 1.80. Conclusion: RHI was significantly associated with ASCVD under treatment for lifestyle diseases and the cutoff value was 1.80. J Clin Med Res. 2020;12(5):293-299 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4100

We investigated the associations between endothelial dysfunction (ED) as evaluated by the reactive hyperemia index (RHI) obtained using Endo-PAT2000® and atherosclerotic risk factors in patients who underwent coronary artery angiography (CAG).The subjects consisted of 191 patients who were clinically suspected to have CAD and underwent CAG, and in whom we could perform Endo-PAT2000®. We divided the patients into ED (RHI1.67, n = 71) and non-ED (RHI≥1.67, n = 120) groups.The ED group was significantly older and showed a higher ratio of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (L/H) than the non-ED group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the associations between the presence of ED and age, gender, and BMI in addition to L/H. Age [odds ratio (OR) = 1.03,L/H was an independent marker of the presence of ED in patients without dyslipidemia. In addition, among patients with statin treatment, HDL-C was an independent marker of the presence of ED.

Many patients still have high blood pressure (BP) after treatment with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers (ARBs). We compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan to those of olmesartan in a prospective randomized clinical trial. Sixty-four hypertensive patients who were treated with ARBs other than azilsartan and olmesartan were enrolled in this study. We randomly assigned patients to changeover from their prior ARBs to either azilsartan or olmesartan, and followed the patients for 3 months. Systolic BP (SBP) in the azilsartan group was significantly decreased at 3 months, and diastolic BP (DBP) and pulse rate (PR) in the olmesartan group showed significant reductions after 3 months. There were no significant differences in ΔSBP, ΔDBP, or ΔPR (Δ = the value at 3 months minus the value at 0 months) between the groups. Serum levels of creatinine (Cr), uric acid (UA), and potassium (K) in the azilsartan group significantly increased after 3 months. While the changes in Cr, UA, and K were within the respective normal ranges, ΔSBP was positively associated with ΔCr in the azilsartan group. In conclusion, there was no difference in the depressor effects of azilsartan and olmesartan, and there were no serious changes in biochemical parameters with azilsartan and olmesartan.

There is a lack of data on how to treat hypertensive patients with diabetes when treatment with medium doses of calcium channel blocker and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) is insufficient to achieve the target blood pressure (BP). A total of 121 participants with type 2 diabetes and uncontrolled essential hypertension, who were receiving medium doses of amlodipine (5 mg/day) and ARB, were enrolled. Participants were randomized to receive either a high dose of amlodipine (10 mg/day) plus a medium dose of ARB (high-AML) or a medium dose of amlodipine (5 mg/day) plus a high dose of ARB (high-ARB). The depressor effects of these two regimens were monitored using a telemonitoring home BP-measuring system. Fifty-four patients were excluded after an observation period, and the remaining 67 eligible participants were randomized into the two groups; 42 which had a record of their home BP for analysis. The change in morning home systolic and diastolic BP was greater in the high-AML than in the high-ARB (systolic BP; - 7.9 mmHg vs. + 2.7 mmHg; p = 0.0002, diastolic BP; - 3.9 mmHg vs. + 0.6 mmHg; p = 0.0007). In addition, the home systolic and diastolic BP before going to bed and office systolic BP were significantly reduced from week 0 only in the high-AML. An increased dose of amlodipine, but not ARB, reduced home morning BP in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes who were already receiving combination therapy with medium doses of amlodipine and ARB.

Background: Guidelines for the management of hypertension recommend the use of drugs with different mechanisms of action in antihypertensive regimens that include single-pill fixed-dose combinations of medications. There is some controversy regarding which single-pill fixed-dose combinations of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are effective at reducing blood pressure (BP). Methods: Forty hypertensive patients who were receiving a single-pill fixed-dose combination of valsartan 80 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day or irbesartan 100 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day were enrolled. They were randomly divided into two treatment groups, a group that changed to a single-pill fixed-dose combination of azilsartan 20 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day (changeover group) and a group that continued to receive valsartan 80 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day or irbesartan 100 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day (control group), and treated for 16 weeks. Results: There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) or pulse rate (PR) at 16 weeks between the control and changeover groups. In addition, there were no significant changes in biochemical parameters throughout the study period in both groups. Conclusion: The ability of a single-pill fixed-dose combination of azilsartan and amlodipine to reduce BP may be comparable to that of a combination of valsartan and amlodipine or irbesartan and amlodipine. J Clin Med Res. 2016;8(12):888-892 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2768w

There is some controversy regarding which single-pill fixed-dose combinations of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are effective at reducing blood pressure (BP).Sixty hypertensive patients who received a single-pill fixed-dose combination of valsartan 80 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day were enrolled (UMIN Registration 000013460). They were randomly divided into two treatment groups [single-pill fixed-dose combination therapy with valsartan 80 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day (Val/Am group), or irbesartan 100 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day (Irb/Am group)] and treated for 16 weeks. If the patient did not reach the target office BP at 8 weeks, they received double doses of amlodipine (10 mg/day).In the Irb/Am group, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were significantly decreased at 16 weeks. There were no significant changes in SBP or DBP in the Val/Am group. In the Irb/Am group, serum uric acid (UA) was significantly decreased at 8 weeks and patients who had hyperuricemia showed significantly decreased serum UA at 16 weeks. In addition, the levels of triglycerides (TG) were significantly decreased at 16 weeks in the Irb/Am group.A single-pill fixed-dose combination therapy with irbesartan 100 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day was superior to the combination of valsartan 80 mg/day and amlodipine 5 mg/day with respect to significant decreases in BP, serum UA and TG in patients with hypertension.