1. Parkinson Anxiety Scale: A Validation Study for the Brazilian Population
- Author
-
Renilson Moraes-Ferreira, Erik Artur Cortinhas-Alves, Wilson Mateus Gomes da Costa Alves, Clebson Pantoja Pimentel, Odilon Abrahin, Maysa Alves Rodrigues Brandão-Rangel, Evitom Correa-Sousa, and Rodolfo de Paula Vieira
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Intraclass correlation ,Beck Anxiety Inventory ,lcsh:RC346-429 ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Rating scale ,0502 economics and business ,medicine ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,Construct validity ,Validation study ,medicine.disease ,Inter-rater reliability ,Neurology ,Convergent validity ,Anxiety disorder ,Physical therapy ,Parkinson’s disease ,Anxiety ,Original Article ,Neurology (clinical) ,medicine.symptom ,business ,050203 business & management ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective The Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) was developed to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and it has not yet been adapted and validated in Portuguese. Thus, this study evaluated the reliability and validity of a translated and adapted version of the PAS for the Brazilian population of PD patients. Methods The Parkinson Anxiety Scale – Brazilian Version (PAS-BV) was completed by 55 patients with PD. The reliability (test-retest reliability, interrater reliability and internal consistency) and construct validity of the PAS-BV were assessed by comparing it with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Parkinson’s Disease Fatigue Scale (PFS) and the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III. Results Patients with PD had an average age of 64.51 ± 9.20 years and had PD for an average of 6.98 ± 5.02 years. The reliability of the PAS-BV was 0.83, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (retest-test) was 0.88. The scale presented good convergent validity with the BAI (rs = 0.82, p < 0.05). It also presented good divergent validity with the PFS (rs = 0.24, p > 0.05) and the UPDRS part II (rs = -0.10, p > 0.05), part III (rs = -0.21, p > 0.05), and part IV (rs = 0.03, p > 0.05), as indicated by the absence of significant correlations. However, there was a significant correlation between the PAS-BV and part I of the UPDRS (rs = 0.67, p < 0.05). Conclusion The PAS-BV presents substantial reliability and validity for patients with PD without dementia.
- Published
- 2020