1. A Risk Score for Predicting the Incidence of Hemorrhage in Critically Ill Neonates: Development and Validation Study
- Author
-
Maria Lampridou, Argirios E. Tsantes, Anastasios G. Kriebardis, Antonis Gounaris, Stavroula Parastatidou, Aikaterini Konstantinidi, Stefanos Bonovas, Georgios Ioakeimidis, Nicoletta Iacovidou, Rozeta Sokou, Andreas G Tsantes, Daniele Piovani, Petros Kopterides, and Marianna Politou
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Prognostic variable ,Framingham Risk Score ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Hematology ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Logistic regression ,Confidence interval ,03 medical and health sciences ,Thromboelastometry ,0302 clinical medicine ,Emergency medicine ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Internal validity ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
The aim of the study was to develop and validate a prediction model for hemorrhage in critically ill neonates which combines rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters and clinical variables. This cohort study included 332 consecutive full-term and preterm critically ill neonates. We performed ROTEM and used the neonatal bleeding assessment tool (NeoBAT) to record bleeding events. We fitted double selection least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logit regression to build our prediction model. Bleeding within 24 hours of the ROTEM testing was the outcome variable, while patient characteristics, biochemical, hematological, and thromboelastometry parameters were the candidate predictors of bleeding. We used both cross-validation and bootstrap as internal validation techniques. Then, we built a prognostic index of bleeding by converting the coefficients from the final multivariable model of relevant prognostic variables into a risk score. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to calculate the area under curve (AUC) of our prediction index. EXTEM A10 and LI60, platelet counts, and creatinine levels were identified as the most robust predictors of bleeding and included them into a Neonatal Bleeding Risk (NeoBRis) index. The NeoBRis index demonstrated excellent model performance with an AUC of 0.908 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.870–0.946). Calibration plot displayed optimal calibration and discrimination of the index, while bootstrap resampling ensured internal validity by showing an AUC of 0.907 (95% CI: 0.868–0.947). We developed and internally validated an easy-to-apply prediction model of hemorrhage in critically ill neonates. After external validation, this model will enable clinicians to quantify the 24-hour bleeding risk.
- Published
- 2020