Search

Aim: To evaluate the albuminuria‐lowering effect of dapagliflozin, exenatide, and the combination of dapagliflozin and exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria. Methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 30 ml/min/1.73m2 and an urinary albumin: creatinine ratio (UACR) of more than 3.5 mg/mmol and 100 mg/mmol or less completed three 6‐week treatment periods, during which dapagliflozin 10 mg/d, exenatide 2 mg/wk and both drugs combined were given in random order. The primary outcome was the percentage change in UACR. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, HbA1c, body weight, extracellular volume, fractional lithium excretion and renal haemodynamic variables as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Results: We enrolled 20 patients, who completed 53 treatment periods in total. Mean percentage change in UACR from baseline was –21.9% (95% CI: –34.8% to –6.4%) during dapagliflozin versus –7.7% (95% CI: –23.5% to 11.2%) during exenatide and –26.0% (95% CI: –38.4% to –11.0%) during dapagliflozin‐exenatide treatment. No correlation was observed in albuminuria responses between the different treatments. Numerically greater reductions in systolic blood pressure, body weight and eGFR were observed during dapagliflozin‐exenatide treatment compared with dapagliflozin or exenatide alone. Renal blood flow and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) did not significantly change with either treatment regimen. However, all but four and two patients in the dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin‐exenatide groups, respectively, showed reductions in ERPF. The filtration fraction did not change during treatment with dapagliflozin or exenatide, and decreased during dapagliflozin‐exenatide treatment (–1.6% [95% CI: –3.2% to –0.01%]; P =.048). Conclusions: In participants with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria, treatment with dapagliflozin, exenatide and dapagliflozin‐exenatide reduced albuminuria, with a numerically larger reduction in the combined dapagliflozin‐exenatide treatment group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure affect many people worldwide. Despite the availability of pharmacological treatments, both diseases remain associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. After observations that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors - originally developed as glucose-lowering agents - improved cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes, dedicated trials were initiated to evaluate the cardiovascular and kidney protective effects in patients with CKD or heart failure. The results of these clinical trials and subsequent detailed analyses have shown that the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are consistent across many patient subgroups, including those with and without type 2 diabetes, at different stages of CKD, and in patients with heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. In addition, post-hoc analyses revealed that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of anaemia and hyperkalaemia in patients with CKD. With respect to their safety, SGLT2 inhibitors are generally well tolerated. More specifically, no increased risk of hypoglycaemia has been observed in patients with CKD or heart failure without diabetes and they do not increase the risk of acute kidney injury. SGLT2 inhibitors therefore provide clinicians with an exciting new treatment option for patients with CKD and heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High protein intake may increase intraglomerular pressure through dilation of the afferent arteriole. Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may reduce intraglomerular pressure through activation of tubuloglomerular feedback. Given these opposing effects, we assessed whether the effect of dapagliflozin on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (UACR) was modified by estimated dietary protein intake using data from three separate randomized controlled trials (DELIGHT, IMPROVE and DIAMOND). The median protein intake was 58.4, 63.6 and 90.0 g/d, respectively. In the DELIGHT trial (n = 233), dapagliflozin compared to placebo caused an acute and reversible dip in GFR of 2.1 and 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, and reduced UACR by 20.5% and 28.4% in participants with high and low protein intake, respectively. Similarly, in IMPROVE (n = 30) and DIAMOND (n = 53), the effect of dapagliflozin on GFR and UACR was comparable in participants with high and low protein intake (all P for interaction > 0.40). This post hoc, exploratory analysis of three clinical trials suggests that dietary protein intake does not modify the individual response of clinical kidney variables to dapagliflozin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effects of glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) on renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk are modest or neutral. However, GLP‐1RAs may confer clinical benefits in those at high risk of progressive renal function loss. We examined the effects of once‐weekly exenatide (EQW) on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) slope and urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) as a function of baseline UACR in 3503 EXSCEL participants (23.7%) with eGFR data available and 2828 participants (19.2%) with UACR change data available. EQW improved eGFR slope assessed via mixed model repeated measures, compared with placebo, in participants with baseline UACR >100 mg/g (0.79 mL/min/1.73 m2/year [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.24–1.34]) and UACR >200 mg/g (1.32 mL/min/1.73 m2/year [95% CI 0.57–2.06]), but not at lower UACR thresholds. EQW reduced UACR, compared with placebo, assessed via analysis of covariance, consistently across subgroups with baseline UACR >30 mg/g (28.2% reduction), baseline UACR >100 mg (22.5% reduction) and baseline UACR >200 mg (34.5% reduction). This post hoc EXSCEL analysis suggests that EQW reduces UACR, with improvement in eGFR slope specifically in participants with elevated baseline UACR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical trials of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists have shown beneficial effects of these agents on kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two new cohort studies now demonstrate that these findings are generalizable to the broad range of patients seen in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]