1. Language Input Effects on L2 Composition Peer Review Feedback
- Author
-
Williams, Clay
- Abstract
To date, very little research on L2 peer review of L2 essay composition has focused on the issue of whether the choice of L1 or L2 use in the peer review process facilitates or hinders students' transmission and reception of productive commentary on their essay drafts. This study was designed to ascertain the impact of language choice in written peer review sessions on both the types of commentary made and essay authors' propensity to incorporate peer commentary into subsequent drafts. Data was collected from essay assignments in an English writing course at an English-medium university in Japan using written peer reviews conducted in both Japanese and English in a cross-balanced design. The data were analyzed to measure the impact of the language used on the number and types of comments made, as well as to ascertain the relative impact of peer commentary on the subsequent revisions. The study found sizeable differences according to the language a peer review was conducted in, suggesting that L2 written peer reviews may be more beneficial at identifying/rectifying paragraph-level and structural issues, whereas L1 peer review was slightly better for correcting rhetorical and logical issues.
- Published
- 2018