Search

Purpose: Repeated gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced MRIs are crucial in the diagnosis and follow-up of oncologic and chronic disorders in pediatric patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of adverse reactions to GBCAs in children after a single vs. multiple GBCA-enhanced abdomen MRIs. Material and methods: All pediatric patients with at least one GBCA-enhanced abdominal MRI between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated based on adverse reactions reports, according to the classification system of the American College of Radiology and guidelines on contrast agents of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. A Student´s t-test analysis, a spearman ρ-correlation and a Chi-square test between the reported adverse reactions and the total number of GBCA applications, and the number of each applied GBCA was calculated. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Of 623 patients with 964 GBCA-enhanced abdomen MRIs, there were 464 patients with only one and 159 patients with multiple GBCA administrations. Of 964 GBCA doses administrated, two cases with urticaria (mild allergy-like adverse reaction) and one case with vomiting (mild chemotoxic adverse reaction) were recorded (3/964 = 0.31%), but all the reports were in patients with multiple GBCA administration (3/159 = 1.89%). No adverse reactions in patients with a single GBCA administration were observed. The reported adverse reactions correlated significantly with the total number of GBCAs (p<0.001) and the number of each GBCA (p<0.001 or p = 0.002). The independent two-tailed t-tests, and the chi-square test were significant (p<0.001, p = 0.003). Conclusion: GBCA-associated adverse reactions are rare and mostly mild, but initially well-tolerated GBCA could cause adverse reactions due to the increase likelihood of drug hypersensitivity upon repeated GBCA exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) are acquired focal liver lesions, that occur mainly in young-to-middle-aged women who are on long-term estrogen-containing contraceptives or young men after prolonged use of anabolic steroids. Furthermore, distinct underlying diseases, such as obesity, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, glycogen storage disease, etc. are considered risk factors. The 2017 Bordeaux classification, in particular Nault et al, divided HCAs into eight subtypes according to their pheno- and genotypic characteristics. This includes HCAs with hepatocyte-nuclear-factor (HNF1-alpha mutation), HCAs with β-catenin mutation, and HCAs without either of these genetic mutations, which are further subdivided into HCAs with and without inflammatory cells. HCAs should no longer be classified as purely benign without histologic workup since three of the eight subtypes are considered high-risk lesions, requiring adequate management: malignant transformation of the pure (ßex3-HCA) and mixed inflammatory/β-catenin exon 3 (ßex3-IHCA) adenomas, as well as potential bleeding of the sonic hedgehog HCA and pure (ßex7/8-HCA) and mixed inflammatory/β-catenin exon 7/8 (ßex7/8-IHCA). Elective surgery is recommended for any HCA in a male, or for any HCA exceeding 5 cm. Although MRI can classify up to 80% of adenomas, if findings are equivocal, biopsy remains the reference standard for adenoma subtype. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal neoplasm and the second most common cause for cancer-related death in Europe. Imaging plays an important role both in the primary diagnosis, treatment evaluation, follow-up, and, to some extent, also in prevention. Like in the clinical setting, colon and rectal cancer have to be distinguished as two quite separate entities with different goals of imaging and, consequently, also different technical requirements. Over the past decade, there have been improvements in both more robust imaging techniques and new data and guidelines that help to use the optimal imaging modality for each scenario. For colon cancer, the continued research on computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) has led to high-level evidence that puts this technique on eye height to optical colonoscopy in terms of detection of cancer and polyps ≥10 mm. However, also for smaller polyps and thus for screening purposes, CTC seems to be an optimal tool. In rectal cancer, the technical requirements to perform state-of-the art imaging have recently been defined. Evaluation of T-stage, mesorectal fascia infiltration and extramural vascular invasion are the most important prognostic factors that can be identified on MRI. With this information, risk stratification both for local and distal failure is possible, enabling the clinician to tailor the optimal therapeutic approach in non-metastatic rectal cancer. Imaging of metastatic CRC is also covered, although the complex ramifications of treatment options in the metastatic setting are beyond the scope of this article. In this review, the most important recent developments in the imaging of colon and rectal cancer will be highlighted. If used in an interdisciplinary setting, this can lead to an individualized treatment concept for each patient.

The 10th Global Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging was held in October 2021. The themes of the presentations and discussions at this Forum are described in detail in the review by Taouli et al (2023). The focus of this second manuscript developed from the Forum is on multidisciplinary tumor board perspectives in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management: how to approach early-, mid-, and late-stage management from the perspectives of a liver surgeon, an interventional radiologist, and an oncologist. The manuscript also includes a panel discussion by multidisciplinary experts on three selected cases that explore challenging aspects of HCC management. Clinical relevance statement: This review highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach in liver cancer patients and includes the perspectives of a liver surgeon, an interventional radiologist, and an oncologist, including illustrative case studies. Key Points: • A liver surgeon, interventional radiologist, and oncologist presented their perspectives on the treatment of early-, mid-, and late-stage HCC. • Different perspectives on HCC management between specialties emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary tumor boards. • A multidisciplinary faculty discussed challenging aspects of HCC management, as highlighted by three case studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 10th Global Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was held as a virtual 2-day meeting in October 2021, attended by delegates from North and South America, Asia, Australia, and Europe. Most delegates were radiologists with experience in liver MRI, with representation also from specialists in liver surgery, oncology, and hepatology. Presentations, discussions, and working groups at the Forum focused on the following themes: • Gadoxetic acid in clinical practice: Eastern and Western perspectives on current uses and challenges in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening/surveillance, diagnosis, and management • Economics and outcomes of HCC imaging • Radiomics, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) applications of MRI in HCC. These themes are the subject of the current manuscript. A second manuscript discusses multidisciplinary tumor board perspectives: how to approach early-, mid-, and late-stage HCC management from the perspectives of a liver surgeon, interventional radiologist, and oncologist (Taouli et al, 2023). Delegates voted on consensus statements that were developed by working groups on these meeting themes. A consensus was considered to be reached if at least 80% of the voting delegates agreed on the statements. Clinical relevance statement: This review highlights the clinical applications of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for liver cancer screening and diagnosis, as well as its cost-effectiveness and the applications of radiomics and AI in patients with liver cancer. Key Points: • Interpretation of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI differs slightly between Eastern and Western guidelines, reflecting different regional requirements for sensitivity vs specificity. • Emerging data are encouraging for the cost-effectiveness of gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI in HCC screening and diagnosis, but more studies are required. • Radiomics and artificial intelligence are likely, in the future, to contribute to the detection, staging, assessment of treatment response and prediction of prognosis of HCC—reducing the burden on radiologists and other specialists and supporting timely and targeted treatment for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Relative enhancement (RE) in gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI is a reliable, non-invasive method for the evaluation and differentiation between simple steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of RE in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI and hepatic fat fraction (HFF) in unenhanced liver MRI and ultrasound (US) for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) screening in pediatric obesity. Seventy-four liver US and MRIs from 68 pediatric patients (13.07 ± 2.95 years) with obesity (BMI > BMI-for-age + 2SD) were reviewed with regard to imaging biomarkers (liver size, volume, echogenicity, HFF, and RE in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRIs, and spleen size), blood biomarkers, and BMI. The agreement between the steatosis grade, according to HFF in MRI and the echogenicity in US, was moderate. Alanine aminotransferase correlated better with the imaging biomarkers in MRI than with those in US. BMI correlated better with liver size and volume on MRI than in US. In patients with RE < 1, blood biomarkers correlated better with RE than those in the whole sample, with a significant association between gamma-glutamyltransferase and RE (p = 0.033). In conclusion, the relative enhancement and hepatic fat fraction can be considered as non-invasive tools for the screening and follow-up of NAFLD in pediatric obesity, superior to echogenicity on ultrasound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Early noninvasive detection of incipient liver damage is crucial to prevent long-term adverse health outcomes. A variety of scores to assess liver status have been proposed, mostly for adult populations. Validation of noninvasive hepatic scores to identify children at risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a gap in research, particularly in youth with severe obesity considering pubertal stage and sex. Methods: In a well-characterized pediatric population aged 9–19 years (n = 115), 19 published liver scores were analyzed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for determination of MAFLD as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging was calculated. Results: The pediatric indices PNFI, B-AST, and M-APRI and several scores developed in adults significantly differed in children with MAFLD compared to children without, while some established indices did not. Only nonalcoholic fatty liver disease liver fat score (NAFLD-LFS) and the model by Cao et al. [PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82092] showed acceptable predictive accuracy (AUROC >0.8) independently of pubertal stage and sex. When stratifying for pubertal stage and sex, the GSG-Index was superior in pubertal girls, and NAFLD-LFS performed best in pubertal boys. Conclusion: NAFLD-LFS and the model by Cao et al. [PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82092] were well suited to predict MAFLD in youth with severe obesity. In pubertal children, GSG-Index and NAFLD-LFS performed best in girls and boys, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Magnetic resonance imaging with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI‐MRCP) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is currently based on qualitative assessment and has high interobserver variability. We investigated the utility and performance of quantitative metrics derived from a three‐dimensional biliary analysis tool in adult patients with PSC. MRI‐MRCP, blood‐based biomarkers, and FibroScan were prospectively performed in 80 participants with large‐duct PSC and 20 healthy participants. Quantitative analysis was performed using MRCP+ (Perspectum Ltd., United Kingdom), and qualitative reads were performed by radiologists. Inter‐reader agreements were compared. Patients were classified into high risk or low risk for disease progression, using Mayo risk score (MRS), Amsterdam‐Oxford model (AOM), upper limit of normal (ULN) alkaline phosphatase (ALP), disease distribution, and presence of dominant stricture. Performance of noninvasive tools was assessed using binomial logistic regressions and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Quantitative biliary metrics performed well to distinguish abnormal from normal bile ducts (P < 0.0001). Interobserver agreements for MRCP+ dilatation metrics (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.90‐0.96) were superior to modified Amsterdam intrahepatic stricture severity score (κ = 0.74) and Anali score (κ = 0.38). MRCP+ intrahepatic dilatation severity showed excellent performance to classify patients into high‐risk and low‐risk groups, using predictors of disease severity as the reference (MRS, P < 0.0001; AOM, P = 0.0017; 2.2 × ULN ALP, P = 0.0007; 1.5 × ULN ALP, P = 0.0225; extrahepatic disease, P = 0.0331; dominant stricture, P = 0.0019). MRCP+ intrahepatic dilatation severity was an independent predictor of MRS >0 (odds ratio, 31.3; P = 0.035) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Intrahepatic biliary dilatation severity calculated using MRCP+ is elevated in patients with high‐risk PSC and may be used as an adjunct for risk stratification in PSC. This exploratory study has provided the groundwork for examining the utility of novel quantitative biliary metrics in multicenter studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]