Search

AimsTo highlight the need for the development of effective and realistic workforce strategies for critical care nurses, in both a steady state and pandemic.BackgroundIn acute care settings, there is an inverse relationship between nurse staffing and iatrogenesis, including mortality. Despite this, there remains a lack of consensus on how to determine safe staffing levels. Intensive care units (ICU) provide highly specialised complex healthcare treatments. In developed countries, mortality rates in the ICU setting are high and significantly varied after adjustment for diagnosis. The variability has been attributed to systems, patient and provider issues including the workload of critical care nurses.DesignDiscursive paper.FindingsNursing workforce is the single most influential mediating variable on ICU patient outcomes. Numerous systematic reviews have been undertaken in an effort to quantify the effect of critical care nurses on mortality and morbidity, invariably leading to the conclusion that the association is similar to that reported in acute care studies. This is a consequence of methodological limitations, inconsistent operational definitions and variability in endpoint measures. We evaluated the impact inadequate measurement has had on capturing relevant critical care data, and we argue for the need to develop effective and realistic ICU workforce measures.ConclusionCOVID-19 has placed an unprecedented demand on providing health care in the ICU. Mortality associated with ICU admission has been startling during the pandemic. While ICU systems have largely remained static, the context in which care is provided is profoundly dynamic and the role and impact of the critical care nurse needs to be measured accordingly. Often, nurses are passive recipients of unplanned and under-resourced changes to workload, and this has been brought into stark visibility with the current COVID-19 situation. Unless critical care nurses are engaged in systems management, achieving consistently optimal ICU patient outcomes will remain elusive.Relevance to clinical practiceObjective measures commonly fail to capture the complexity of the critical care nurses' role despite evidence to indicate that as workload increases so does risk of patient mortality, job stress and attrition. Critical care nurses must lead system change to develop and evaluate valid and reliable workforce measures.

Fundamental care combines the needs of the person being cared for with the caregiver’s actions. The approach is not just about addressing an individual’s physical needs but about understanding and addressing the psychosocial and relational needs of the person receiving care while providing support, generating trust, and associated appropriate actions and behaviours. It is a relationship process that takes place within the framework of an organisation with solid policies and systems that place the person at the centre of attention while enabling workers' job satisfaction. These fundamental needs are only met through a positive and trusting relationship with the care recipient, including their family and everyone involved. Abstracto. Los cuidados fundamentales combinan las necesidades de la persona atendida con las acciones de quien la cuida. No se trata solo de las necesidades físicas, sino que también comprenden las necesidades psicosociales y relacionales de la persona, respaldadas por la confianza y acciones adecuadas de los que la cuidan. El proceso se desarrolla en el marco de una organización que cuenta con políticas y sistemas sólidos que sitúan a la persona en el centro de la atención, mientras habilitan la satisfacción laboral de los trabajadores. Estas necesidades fundamentales sólo se satisfacen a través de una relación positiva y de confianza con la persona que recibe los cuidados, incluyendo a su familia y a todos los involucrados en el proceso. Pinero de Plaza & Kitson, 2023 - Spanish adaptation of the Fundamentals of Care Framework: White paper in Spanish and English. Flinders University. DOI: 10.25451/flinders.23280881 Prepared for the first research symposium on care and humanisation and revised by Ana María Porcel Gálvez (PhD, BSc, RN) & Regina Allande Cusso (PhD, RN). Conference Organised by INVESCARE Granada, Spain. (12 of June 2023). The English version is accessible from pages 12 -21.

Background Approximately 20% of all surgery performed in Canada is scheduled by allocation into emergency operating room time. There is currently no national standard for managing how this mixture of emergent, urgent, and semi urgent surgical cases should progress to the operating room. Methods We introduced a novel dynamic multi priority emergency surgery waitlist management system to a medium-sized Canadian acute care hospital from December 1, 2018 to February 28, 2019. Our hospitals critical incident reporting system was monitored before and during the study for any evidence of related adverse patient safety events. Internet-based user acceptance surveys were collected from users at 28 days and 89 days into the study. Results 703 operations were scheduled for 684 patients. The electronic system was reliable and had no outages or shutdowns over 89 days. There was no detectable change in the incidence of adverse patient safety events during the study. Overall, there were 54 system users enrolled in the study. The user acceptance survey results were not statistically significant but did show a preference for the new scheduling system in the surgeon user group, all other users preferred the original system. Discussion While there are evident efficiencies from the use of information systems in other industries the safe introduction of a such a system in the emergency surgery setting has never been fully realized. The authors relate the development of the novel multi-priority emergency surgery waitlist management system that was introduced in this study. The challenges of implementing this system and the limitations of the study are discussed. Conclusion The introduction of a novel emergency surgery waitlist management system into this active operating room setting for 89 days was not associated with a change in reported patient safety events. The tested system was reliable and was preferred by some surgeon users.

The 2014 outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in West Africa has presented a significant public health crisis to the international health community and challenged U.S. emergency departments (EDs) to prepare for patients with a disease of exceeding rarity in developed nations. With the presentation of patients with Ebola to U.S. acute care facilities, ethical questions have been raised in both the press and medical literature as to how U.S. EDs, emergency physicians (EPs), emergency nurses, and other stakeholders in the health care system should approach the current epidemic and its potential for spread in the domestic environment. To address these concerns, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Emergency Nurses Association, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine developed this joint position paper to provide guidance to U.S. EPs, emergency nurses, and other stakeholders in the health care system on how to approach the ethical dilemmas posed by the outbreak of EVD. This paper will address areas of immediate and potential ethical concern to U.S. EDs in how they approach preparation for and management of potential patients with EVD.

Purpose UNC Medical Center converted to an electronic health record (EHR) in 2014. This conversion allowed for the transition of paper chemotherapy orders to be managed electronically. This article describes the process for converting inpatient paper chemotherapy orders into the new EHR in a safe and effective manner. Summary A collaborative interdisciplinary approach to the EHR transition enabled our organization to move from using paper chemotherapy orders to fully electronic chemotherapy treatment plans in both ambulatory and acute care areas. Active chemotherapy orders for acute care inpatients were reviewed and transcribed by two oncology pharmacists in the cancer hospital prior to being signed by an attending physician. The newly input orders were independently verified by two pharmacists in the cancer hospital inpatient pharmacy. Nurse review of the signed and verified treatment plans, along with reconciliation of the medication administration record ensured a safe transition to the new EHR workflow. Providers benefit from the ability to review treatment plans remotely, track changes, and include supportive medications in one consolidated location. The coordinated team effort allowed for a smooth transition with minimal interruptions to patient care. Conclusion The pharmacist-led, multidisciplinary conversion to electronic chemotherapy orders was safe, accurate, and occurred ahead of schedule for the EHR go-live. Advance communication and planning around scheduled inpatient admissions helped to minimize the impact of the transition from paper to electronic treatment plans. Both pharmacist and physician engagement were necessary to ensure a smooth transition for active inpatient treatment plans.

The 2014 outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in West Africa has presented a significant public health crisis to the international health community and challenged US emergency departments to prepare for patients with a disease of exceeding rarity in developed nations. With the presentation of patients with Ebola to US acute care facilities, ethical questions have been raised in both the press and medical literature as to how US emergency departments, emergency physicians, emergency nurses and other stakeholders in the healthcare system should approach the current epidemic and its potential for spread in the domestic environment. To address these concerns, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Emergency Nurses Association and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine developed this joint position paper to provide guidance to US emergency physicians, emergency nurses and other stakeholders in the healthcare system on how to approach the ethical dilemmas posed by the outbreak of EVD. This paper will address areas of immediate and potential ethical concern to US emergency departments in how they approach preparation for and management of potential patients with EVD.

IntroductionHealth Data Research UK designated seven UK-based Hubs to facilitate health data use for research. PIONEER is the Hub in Acute Care. PIONEER delivered workshops where patients/public citizens agreed key principles to guide access to unconsented, anonymised, routinely collected health data. These were used to inform the protocol.MethodsThis paper describes the PIONEER infrastructure and data access processes. PIONEER is a research database and analytical environment that links routinely collected health data across community, ambulance and hospital healthcare providers. PIONEER aims ultimately to improve patient health and care, by making health data discoverable and accessible for research by National Health Service, academic and commercial organisations. The PIONEER protocol incorporates principles identified in the public/patient workshops. This includes all data access requests being reviewed by the Data Trust Committee, a group of public citizens who advise on whether requests should be supported prior to licensed access.Ethics and disseminationEast Midlands–Derby REC (20/EM/0158): Confidentiality Advisory Group (20/CAG/0084). www.PIONEERdatahub.co.uk

Aims A discussion of partnership in the context of family centered care in the acute paediatric setting, through a critical analysis of partnership models. Background Paediatric healthcare practitioners understand the importance of family centered care, but struggle with how to translate the core tenets into action and are confused by several rival terms. Partnering relationships are included in definitions of family centered care, yet less is known about strategies to fully engage or support parents in these partnerships. A rigorous examination of concepts embedded in family centered care such as partnership may provide a better understanding of how to implement the broader concept and support exemplary care in today's clinical practice environment. Design Discussion paper. Data Sources Electronic search (January 2000 - December 2014) performed on CINAHL, Medline, EMBASE, Sociological Abstracts and PsychINFO using keywords partnership, family centered care and conceptual framework. Eligible references were drawn from the databases, reference lists and expert sources. Eight models met inclusion criteria and had currency and relevance to the acute paediatric setting. Implications for Nursing Nurses should continue exploring partnership in various paediatric contexts given the wide-ranging definitions, lack of operational indicators and need for stronger relational statements in current models. An examination of key strategies, barriers and facilitators of partnership is recommended. Conclusion One partnership model had both high overall maturity and best fit with family centered care principles. All models originate from Western and developed countries, indicating that future partnership models should be more geographically, culturally and economically diverse. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effective team decision making has the potential to improve the quality of health care outcomes. Medical Emergency Teams (METs), a specific type of team led by either critical care nurses or physicians, must respond to and improve the outcomes of deteriorating patients. METs routinely make decisions under conditions of uncertainty and suboptimal care outcomes still occur. In response, the development and use of Shared Mental Models (SMMs), which have been shown to promote higher team performance under stress, may enhance patient outcomes. This discussion paper specifically focuses on the development and use of SMMs in the context of METs. Within this process, the psychological mechanisms promoting enhanced team performance are examined and the utility of this model is discussed through the narrative of six habits applied to MET interactions. A two stage, reciprocal model of both nonanalytic decision making within the acute care environment and analytic decision making during reflective action learning was developed. These habits are explored within the context of a MET, illustrating how applying SMMs and action learning processes may enhance team-based problem solving under stress. Based on this model, we make recommendations to enhance MET decision making under stress. It is suggested that the corresponding habits embedded within this model could be imparted to MET members and tested by health care researchers to assess the efficacy of this integrated decision making approach in respect to enhanced team performance and patient outcomes.

The current process of care transitions for individuals with disabling conditions is both ineffective and inefficient. There is a need for clinicians with the necessary knowledge and skills to advocate and facilitate transitions that result in the greatest value to the patients, their families, and the healthcare delivery system. A review of the literature reveals significant problems with transitions to postacute care (PAC) settings. Care is fragmented, disorganized, and guided by factors unrelated to the quality of care or patient outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that the selection of a PAC setting for patients is influenced by multiple factors (Sandel et al., 2009; Gage, 2009). Patients’ clinically assessed needs often do not match the level of care determined by decision makers because optimal patient outcomes may not be the primary factor considered. Competing factors include proximity of providers, relationships between providers of care, payer source, and variation in the interpretations of regulations regarding PAC. Decision makers may include the patient, family members, discharge planners, physicians, insurance company representatives, social workers, and other healthcare providers. Many times, these decision makers lack adequate information to make the best decision during care transition planning. Consequently, care transitions remain a confusing time for patients and their families and can result in both overuse and underuse of PAC services and sub-optimal quality of care and clinical outcomes. Families involved in PAC transitions often feel overwhelmed and dissatisfied (Lutz, Young, Cox, Martz, & Creasy, 2011). PAC is a significant part of the overall care of many Medicare patients. Up to 35% of Medicare patients are discharged each year to a PAC setting (Gage, 2009). Of those Medicare patients discharged, almost one-fourth of Medicare beneficiaries discharged from the hospital to a skilled nursing facility were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days (Mor, Intrator, Feng, & Grabowski, 2010). PAC is provided in various settings, including skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, longterm care hospitals, in the home by home healthcare agencies, and outpatient centers. PAC is provided by a wide array of specialized clinicians from physical therapists, occupational therapists, physicians, speech-language pathologists, neuropsychologists, social workers, discharge planners, and nurses with and without rehabilitation expertise. Rehabilitation is a key component of the care provided in each of these settings. About 30%–60% of the older patients develop new dependence in activities of daily living (ADL) during an acute care hospital stay, which can result in progressive disability after discharge (Huang, Chang, Liu, Lin, & Chen, 2013). Determining the best setting for the patient requires a thorough understanding of rehabilitation services and evidenced-based outcomes to evaluate appropriateness of care for the patient. Pilot studies have demonstrated that when a nurse with an understanding of care transitions is integrated into the process, unplanned 30-day hospital readmission rates decline and outcomes are improved (Congressional Research Service [CRS], 2010).

Introduction Catheter associated urinary tract infections are widely recognized as the most common health care associated infection in the acute care hospital setting. Methods Experts have reviewed the literature on catheter associated urinary tract infections in urological patients. Where the literature was lacking, expert opinion was used to build recommendations which may be useful to the urological community. Results In this white paper we address limitations surrounding how and when current definitions can be used to detect a catheter associated urinary tract infection in a urological patient, and propose alternative methods for diagnosing catheter associated urinary tract infection in specific populations, including geriatric, neurogenic bladder and lower urinary tract reconstruction. Techniques to avoid catheter associated urinary tract infections through proper urethral catheterization and alternatives to indwelling catheters for urological patients are also discussed. Conclusions Patients with urological disorders have specific concerns relating to catheter associated urinary tract infections. A review of the available literature as well as common clinical practice provides directives for the treatment of these patients in a specific and distinctive fashion to reduce the risk of infection. By understanding the needs and technical modifications necessary in these patients, hospital systems and practitioners can limit patient exposure to catheter associated urinary tract infections.

Context: In 2006 the Labour Government in England published its long awaited White Paper on ‘community services’, following on from the 2005 Green Paper on the future of social care. The policy envisages an unprecedented shift of activity and resources from acute care to community settings, along with a much stronger focus on preventive care. Several mechanisms are to be put in place to ensure this shift takes place, most notably practice-based commissioning, payments-by-results and enhanced partnership working. Purpose: This article outlines the intended changes and assesses the extent to which they add up to a coherent strategy. Conclusion: It is argued that although there is widespread support for the overall vision, the strategy contains some difficult policy tensions that are common to other welfare systems. These will have to be addressed if the vision is to be a reality.

Background Older people are at significant risk of adverse outcomes as a result of changes in physiology, frailty, co-morbidity and polypharmacy.1 Timely identification of high-risk patients may facilitate the optimization of medication and reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes. The aims of this study were to evaluate in older inpatients the relationships between risk factors, including frailty and polypharmacy, and adverse health outcomes. Methods This is a prospective study of 1418 patients, aged 70 and older, admitted to general medical units in 11 acute care hospitals across Australia. The interRAI Acute Care (interRAI AC) assessment tool was used for data collection. Frailty status was measured using a Frailty Index (FI), adding each individual’s deficits and dividing by the total number of deficits considered. Adverse health outcomes included falls in hospital, delirium, in-hospital functional and cognitive decline, discharge to a higher level of care and inpatient mortality. Results Patients had a mean age 81 ± 6.8 years with a median length of hospital stay of 6 days (interquartile range 4 to 11 days); 701 (50%) experienced at least one adverse outcome. Polypharmacy (5-9 drugs per day) was observed in almost half of the study population (n=695, 49%) and hyper-polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) observed in about one-third of patients (n=490, 34.6%). Cognitive impairment was shown to be associated with the lower rate of prescribing. FI had a significant association with all adverse outcomes studied (p =

Objectives To examine healthcare worker's perceptions, expectations, and experiences regarding how work processes, patient-related safety, and care were affected when a quaternary care center transitioned from one computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system to a full electronic health record (EHR). Methods The I-SEE survey was administered prior to and 1-year after transition in systems. The construct validity and reliability of the survey was assessed within the current population and also compared to previously published results. Pre- and 1-year post-implementation scale means were compared within and across time periods. Results The majority of respondents were nurses and personnel working in the acute care setting. Because a confirmatory factor analysis indicated a lack of fit of our data to the I-SEE survey's 5-factor structure, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis that resulted in a 7-factor structure which showed better reliability and validity. Mean scores for each factor indicated that attitudes and expectations were mostly positive and score trends over time were positive or neutral. Nurses generally had less positive attitudes about the transition than non-nursing respondents, although the difference diminished after implementation. Conclusions Findings demonstrate that the majority of responding staff were generally positive about transitioning from CPOE system to a full electronic health record (EHR) and understood the goals of doing so, with overall improved ratings over time. In addition, the I-SEE survey, when modified based on our population, was useful for assessing patient care and safety related expectations and experiences during the transition from one CPOE system to an EHR.

guise v., chambers m., valimaki m. & makkonen p. (2010) A mixed-mode approach to data collection: combining web and paper questionnaires to examine nurses' attitudes to mental illness. Journal of Advanced Nursing Abstract Title. A mixed-mode approach to data collection: combining web and paper questionnaires to examine nurses' attitudes to mental illness Aim. This paper is a report an evaluation of the use of a sequential mixed-mode approach to data collection in a study of attitudes to mental illness and people with mental health problems held by Registered Nurses working in adult acute inpatient and psychiatric intensive care settings. Background. The use of electronic tools for data collection is becoming increasingly common in nursing research. Currently there is a lack of reports of the use of mixed-mode designs featuring both web and paper questionnaires. The efficacy of this approach remains unclear. Method. Web and paper versions of a questionnaire including the Community Attitudes towards the Mentally Ill scale were distributed in 2007 to all 148 Registered Nurses working in acute care settings in an English mental healthcare organization. Results. The mixed-mode design was successful in increasing overall response rate. Data collection mode was indicative of statistically significantly different response rates, but had no impact on differences in nurses' socio-demographic characteristics or attitudes to mental illness. The use of email reminders had a positive impact on the web questionnaire return rate. Conclusion. Future nursing studies could benefit from a mixed-mode study design to attain increased response rates and reduce non-response bias, although further research should be undertaken with larger groups of nurses to verify consistently the absence of mode effect on study outcomes.

This is the first special issue of articles contributed by members of the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI, http://www. scai-med.org). Since its founding in 2003, SCAI has focused on bringing acute care clinicians, experimentalists, mathematicians, physicists, and engineers together to tackle refractory problems in critical care. The multidisciplinary society emphasizes quantitative scientific approaches for understanding critical illness and translation of these findings into practice. Over time, the mathematical toolbox discussed by the group has broadened and evolved, from primarily nonlinear timeseries analysis techniques and mechanistic mathematical modeling to include emerging tools such as machine learning methods. SCAI members have also addressed developments relevant to the goals of the society such as innovative applications of acute care electronic health records and novel sensor and imaging technology, prompting the society’s recent name change from ‘‘Society for Complexity in Acute Illness’’ to ‘‘Society for Complex Acute Illness’’. The concept for this special issue was hatched at SCAI’s International Conference on Complexity in Acute Illness (ICCAI, http://www.iccai.org) in September 2011 in Bonn, Germany, the 10th SCAI annual meeting. After an open invitation to SCAI members and past ICCAI contributors to submit relevant manuscripts, 20 contributions were subjected to rigorous peer review, of which 12 were finally accepted for publication in this special issue. The accepted articles reflect the society’s goals and scope, covering a broad range of quantitative methodologies and clinical applications across all of acute care medicine. Advanced timeseries analysis techniques are successfully brought to bear on clinical problems in neurocritical care in the original contributions of Kvandal et al. [1], Park et al. [2], and Soehle et al. [3], using input data available in standard clinical settings. Scheff et al. [4] review applications of similar methodologies in the context of clinical endotoxemia. In another contribution applying timeseries analysis, Dorantes Mendez et al. [5] study the effects of propofol anesthesia induction on baroreflex sensitivity. In Csete and Hunt [6], a pathway towards adapting sensor technology not currently used routinely in acute care for clinical applications is outlined, while Hoog Antink et al. [7] describe and evaluate an algorithm that may help to improve the utility of existing imaging technology in acute care. Advanced applications of electronic medical records in the acute care setting are reviewed by Herasevich et al. [8]. Data driven modeling approaches are well-represented by Guiza et al. [9], in a review of predictive data mining approaches to intensive care data, and the original contribution by Engoren et al. [10], which applies different data driven modeling approaches in predicting perioperative readmission rates and compares their performance. Mechanistic mathematical modeling is applied to physiological processes highly relevant to critical illness by Bagci et al. [11] in an in depth theoretical investigation of possible determinants of interindividual variability in response to proand antiapoptotic interventions. Podziemski and _ Zebrowski [12] present a reduced model of the right atrium with possible applications to further understanding arrhythmias. Finally, the editor would like to thank the numerous anonymous reviewers, without whose dedication and expertise this special issue would not have been possible. S. Zenker (&) Applied Mathematical Physiology (AMP) Laboratory, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitatsklinikum Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany e-mail: Sven.Zenker@ukb.uni-bonn.de

The purpose of this paper is to describe the Nursing Acuity Information System (NAIS)/sup TM/ a microcomputer application which manages patient classification system data entry, processing and reporting. NAIS/sup TM/ has been developed from a pencil and paper system used by the nursing administration at Beverly Hospital, an acute care community facility in northeastern Massachusetts. Augmenting a manual patient classification based staffing system, NAIS/sup TM/ is of particular interest because of its implications for mico-based data management capacities in nursing departments and the innovatative employment of software tools used.

Healthcare Resource Groups [HRG] are the mechanism by which patient activity is classified according to case mix in England. They are the primary funding mechanism for acute care in the English National Health Service [NHS], under the Department of Health's Payment by Results [PbR] national policy. This Department collects annual cost data ('Reference Costs'), and uses this as the basis for setting a national tariff price at an HRG level for acute treatments, procedures and services. The current HRG reimbursement version is HRG version 3.5. The Department of Health has announced that from 1st April 2009, funding will be based on HRG4 instead. "Going Live" Since completing the design of HRG4 in April 2007, the NHS Information Centre Casemix Service has been working with its business partners (DH PbR, NHS Connecting for Health and the Audit Commission) to prepare for its use by the DH PbR team for national reimbursement from April 2009. This work is categorised under a number of key headings: Processes, Products, People.

Rationale, Aims and Objectives:\ud Sharing aspects of the traditional medical record with patients has been successful in primary and antenatal care, but has not been investigated in the UK inpatient setting. Our aim was to evaluate the impact on patient and clinician experience of providing patients with a written lay summary of their care-plan in the acute care setting.\ud \ud Method:\ud We carried out a qualitative interview study on two acute medicine wards in an NHS University Teaching Hospital for a 4-week period in 2019. A summary record, designed in response to suggestions from doctors and patients from a previous study, was distributed to patients on the first ward round after admission. Eligible participants included all doctors and nurses working on and all patients and their families attending the acute medical units; patients were excluded if they lacked capacity to consent or were under 18. We interviewed 20 patients, 10 relatives, 10 doctors and 7 nurses.\ud \ud Results:\ud Patients felt that the summary improved their ability to remember details about their care so they could more accurately and easily update their relatives. They did not feel that the summary induced anxiety. Patient-doctor communication was improved: patients felt empowered to ask more questions and doctors felt that it solidified their plan and encouraged them to avoid medical jargon. Most patients felt the summary included the ‘right’ amount of information. Healthcare professionals were more concerned about the risk of breaching confidentiality than patients. Doctors felt that providing summaries was time-consuming; there were differing opinions about whether this was a worthwhile investment of time. Clinicians recognized that the traditional medical record has many roles.\ud \ud Conclusions:\ud A summary record could empower patients and improve patient-doctor communication but would require additional clinician and administrative time.

Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) are a threat to patient safety and cause substantial medical and economic burden in acute care and long-term care facilities. Risk factors for HCAIs include patient characteristics, the type of care and the setting. Local surveillance data and microbiological characterization are crucial tools for guiding antimicrobial treatment and informing efforts to reduce the incidence of HCAI. Skin and soft tissue infections, including superficial and deep incisional surgical site infections, are among the most frequent HCAIs. Other skin and soft tissue infections associated with healthcare settings include vascular access site infections, infected burns and traumas, and decubitus ulcer infections.

Despite universal healthcare, immigrants often face unique challenges accessing healthcare. Employing an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach, four focus groups were conducted with 29 women and eight men from 15 different countries attending English language classes hosted at a non-governmental organization in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada in 2016 and 2017. Personal factors such as language barrier, lack of transportation, childcare and others interacted with systemic factors such as lack of appointment, long wait times, etc. delaying access at each point of contact with the healthcare system. Participants expressed dissatisfaction with the potency of medications, time spent in appointments and the way healthcare professionals communicated health information. The referral process and wait times were viewed as barriers to accessing specialist, diagnostic and acute care services. Participants were concerned that appropriate healthcare will be unavailable when needed. Strategies addressing systemic and person-specific barriers are needed to provide equitable client-centered care.

Intoxicated persons showing challenging behavior (IPCBs) under influence of alcohol and/or drugs frequently have trouble finding appropriate acute care. Often IPCBs are stigmatized being unwilling or unable to accept help. Separated physical and mental healthcare systems hamper integrated acute care for IPCBs. This pilot aimed to substantiate the physical, psychiatric, and social health needs of IPCBs visiting the emergency room (ER) during a 3-month period. All ER visits were screened. After triage by the ER physician, indicated IPCBs were additionally assessed by the consultation–liaison–psychiatry physician. If needed, IPCBs were admitted to a complexity intervention unit for further examinations to provide integrated treatments and appropriate follow-up care. The INTERMED and Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS) questionnaires were used to substantiate the complexity and needs. Field-relevant stakeholders were interviewed about this approach for acute integrated care. Alongside substance abuse, almost half of identified IPCBs suffered from comorbid psychiatric disturbances and one third showed substantial physical conditions requiring immediate medical intervention. Almost all IPCBs (96%) accepted the acute medical care voluntarily. IPCBs showed high mean initial scores of INTERMED (27.8 ± 10.0) and HoNOS (20.8 ± 6.9). At discharge from the complexity intervention unit, the mean HoNOS score decreased significantly (13.4 ± 8.6; P

To examine the association between nurse skill mix (the proportion of total hours provided by Registered Nurses) and patient outcomes in acute care hospitals.A quantitative systematic review included studies published in English between January 2000 - September 2018.Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Joanna Briggs Institute were searched. Observational and experimental study designs were included. Mix-methods designs were included if the quantitative component met the criteria.The Systematic Review guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute and its critical appraisal instrument were used. An inverse association was determined when seventy-five percent or more of studies with significant results found this association.Sixty-three articles were included. Twelve patient outcomes were inversely associated with nursing skill mix (i.e., higher nursing skill mix was significantly associated with improved patient outcomes). These were length of stay; ulcer, gastritis and upper gastrointestinal bleeds; acute myocardial infarction; restraint use; failure-to-rescue; pneumonia; sepsis; urinary tract infection; mortality/30-day mortality; pressure injury; infections and shock/cardiac arrest/heart failure.Nursing skill mix affected 12 patient outcomes. However, further investigation using experimental or longitudinal study designs are required to establish causal relationships. Consensus on the definition of skill mix is required to enable more robust evaluation of the impact of changes in skill mix on patient outcomes.Skill mix is perhaps more important than the number of nurses in reducing adverse patient outcomes such as mortality and failure to rescue, albeit the optimal staffing profile remains elusive in workforce planning.目的: 在于探讨护士技巧组合(注册护士提供的总时数比例)与急性护理医院患者结果之间的联系。 设计: 一项定量系统综述包括2000年1月至2018年9月期间以英语发表的各项研究。 资料来源: 搜索了Cochrane Library、CINAHL Plus with Full Text、MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science和Joanna Briggs Institute。纳入了观察性和实验性研究设计。如果定量成分符合标准,则纳入混合方法设计。 综述方法: 使用了Joanna Briggs Institute的系统综述指南及其关键评估工具。当75%或者更多具备显著结果的研究发现这种联系时,就确定了反向关联。 结果: 共纳入了63篇文章。12名患者的结果与护理技巧组合呈负相关(即,较高的护理技能组合与患者结果的改善显著相关)。这些是住院天数;溃疡、胃炎和上消化道出血;急性心肌梗死;约束使用;救援失败;肺炎;败血症;尿路感染;死亡率/30天死亡率;压力性损伤;感染和休克/心脏骤停/心力衰竭。 结论: 护理技巧组合影响了12例患者的结果。然而,需要使用实验性或纵向研究设计来进一步调查,从而建立因果关系。需要就技巧组合的定义达成共识,以便能够更有力地评估技巧组合变化对患者结果的影响。 影响: 在降低死亡率和救援失败等不良患者结果方面,技巧组合可能比护士人数更为重要,尽管最佳的人员配置在人力资源规划中仍然让人难懂。.

Background It is essential to identify factors that affect adherence to standard precautions, which could increase risk of occupational exposure to pathogens. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. Nurses (n = 241) in an acute care hospital completed the survey including the Factors Influencing Adherence to Standard Precautions Scale (FIASPS) (total possible scores in each domain ranged from 5 to 25) and the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS) (total possible scores ranged from 0 to 20). Results Results showed moderate influence of the judgement (mean = 14.04, SD = 4.04), leadership (M = 14.58, SD 3.78), and culture/practice (M = 12.61, SD = 3.18) factors; high score on contextual cues (M = 15.77, SD = 3.60); and low score on justification (M = 5.76, SD = 4.57). The overall mean CSPS score was 76.68% (SD 13.82). There was a significant negative relationship between justification for non-use of standard precautions and nurses' adherence with standard precautions (r = −0.24, p, Highlights • Poor adherence to standard precautions increases the risk of exposure to infections. • Regular training sessions can improve perception of risks of non-adherence. • Nurses can be encouraged to be role models in the practice of standard precautions. • Enforcement of policies is crucial to maintain adherence to standard precautions.

The goal of this study is to provide empirical evidence of the impact of nurse staffing levels on seven nursing-sensitive patient outcomes (NSPOs) at the hospital unit level. Combining a very large set of claims data from a German health insurer with mandatory quality reports published by every hospital in Germany, our data set comprises approximately 3.2 million hospital stays in more than 900 hospitals over a period of 5 years. Accounting for the grouping structure of our data (i.e., patients grouped in unit types), we estimate cross-sectional, two-level generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with inpatient cases at level 1 and units types (e.g., internal medicine, geriatrics) at level 2. Our regressions yield 32 significant results in the expected direction. We find that differentiating between unit types using a multilevel regression approach and including postdischarge NSPOs adds important insights to our understanding of the relationship between nurse staffing levels and NSPOs. Extending our main model by categorizing inpatient cases according to their clinical complexity, we are able to rule out hidden effects beyond the level of unit types. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01292-2.

Introduction: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) lacks reliable blood tests for evaluating the nutrition status. We retrospectively compared the GLIM criteria, Controlling Nutrition Status (CONUT) score, and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) to establish effective malnutrition screening and provide appropriate nutritional interventions according to severity. Methods: We classified 177 patients into 3 malnutrition categories (normal/mild, moderate, and severe) according to the GLIM criteria, CONUT score, and SGA. We investigated the malnutrition prevalence, concordance of malnutrition severity, predictability of clinical outcome, concordance by etiology, and clinical outcome by inflammation. Results: The highest prevalence of malnutrition was found using the GLIM criteria (87.6%). Concordance of malnutrition severity was low between the GLIM criteria and CONUT score. Concordance by etiology was low in all groups but was the highest in the “acute disease” group. The area under the curve of clinical outcome and that of the “with inflammation group” were significantly higher when using the CONUT score versus using the other tools (0.679 and 0.683, respectively). Conclusion: The GLIM criteria have high sensitivity, while the CONUT score can effectively predict the clinical outcome of malnutrition. Their combined use can efficiently screen for malnutrition and patient severity in acute care hospitals.

We describe an innovative research protocol to: (a) examine patient-level longitudinal associations between nurse staffing practices and the risk of adverse events in acute care hospitals and; (b) determine possible thresholds for safe nurse staffing.A dynamic cohort of adult medical, surgical and intensive care unit patients admitted to 16 hospitals in Quebec (Canada) between January 2015-December 2019.Patients in the cohort will be followed from admission until 30-day postdischarge to assess exposure to selected nurse staffing practices in relation to the subsequent occurrence of adverse events. Five staffing practices will be measured for each shift of an hospitalization episode, using electronic payroll data, with the following time-varying indicators: (a) nursing worked hours per patient; (b) skill mix; (c) overtime use; (d) education mix and; and (e) experience. Four high-impact adverse events, presumably associated with nurse staffing practices, will be measured from electronic health record data retrieved at the participating sites: (a) failure-to-rescue; (b) in-hospital falls; (c) hospital-acquired pneumonia and; and (d) venous thromboembolism. To examine the associations between the selected nurse staffing exposures and the risk of each adverse event, separate multivariable Cox proportional hazards frailty regression models will be fitted, while adjusting for patient, nursing unit and hospital characteristics, and for clustering. To assess for possible staffing thresholds, flexible non-linear spline functions will be fitted. Funding for the study began in October 2019 and research ethics/institutional approval was granted in February 2020.To our knowledge, this study is the first multisite patient-level longitudinal investigation of the associations between common nurse staffing practices and the risk of adverse events. It is hoped that our results will assist hospital managers in making the most effective use of the scarce nursing resources and in identifying staffing practices that minimize the occurrence of adverse events.目的: 我们描述了一份创新的研究方案: (a) 检查急诊护理医院护士配置方法与不良事件风险之间的患者水平纵向关联; (b) 确定安全护士配置的可能阈值。 设计: 2015年1月至2019年12月期间, 魁北克省 (加拿大) 16家医院收治的成人医疗、外科和重症监护病房患者动态队列研究。 方法: 将从入院到出院后30天里, 对队列研究中的患者进行随访, 以评估与随后发生的不良事件相关的选定护士工作实践的暴露情况。将使用电子工资单数据, 测量住院期间各轮班的五种人员配置方法, 并采用以下时变指标: (a) 各患者的护理工作时间; (b) 技能混合; (c) 加班使用; (d) 教育混合和; 以及 (e) 经验。将从参与站点检索的电子健康记录数据中测量四个可能与护士配置方法相关的高影响不良事件: (a) 抢救失败; (b) 住院量下降; (c) 院内获得性肺炎和; 以及 (d)静脉血栓栓塞。为检测所选护士人员配置暴露与各种不良事件风险之间的关系, 将拟合单独的多变量Cox比例风险脆弱性回归模型, 同时调整患者、护理单位和医院特征, 并进行聚类分析。为评估可能的人员配置阈值, 将拟合灵活的非线性样条函数。我们于2019年10月, 获得该项研究的资助,于2020年2月获得研究伦理/机构的批准。 讨论: 据我们所知, 此项研究是第一次多地点患者水平的纵向调查, 其针对普通护士配置方法与不良事件风险之间的关联。希望我们的研究结果能帮助医院管理者最有效地利用稀缺的护理资源, 并找出减少不良事件发生的人员配置方法。.

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the Coronavirus Disease (COVID‐19) a pandemic due to the huge upsurge in the number of reported cases worldwide. The COVID‐19 pandemic in India has become a public health threat, and if we go by the number of confirmed cases then the situation seems to be a matter of grave concern. According to real‐time data, the numbers of confirmed cases are growing exponentially. No doubt, substantial public health interventions both at the national and state levels are implemented immediately by the Government of India; there is a need for improved preparedness plans and mitigation strategies along with accurate forecasting. The present study aims to forecast the COVID‐19 outbreak infected cases in India. The data have been obtained from https://www.covid19india.org, https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus, and ICMR reported publicly available information about COVID‐19 confirmation cases. We have used the double exponential smoothing method for forecasting the trends in terms of confirmed, active, recovered and death cases from COVID‐19 for emergency preparedness and future predictions. Findings reveal that the estimated value of point forecast is just 8.22% of the total number of confirmed cases reported on a daily basis across the country. It was observed that the deaths were lower for the states and union territories with a higher detection rate. It is suggested that by keeping in view the limited healthcare resources in the country, accurate forecasting, early detection, and avoidance of acute care for the majority of infected cases is indispensable.

Background Patient portals play an important role in connecting patients with their medical care team, which improves patient engagement in treatment plans, decreases unnecessary visits, and reduces costs. During natural disasters, patients’ needs increase, whereas available resources, specifically access to care, become limited. Objective This study aims to examine patients’ health needs during a natural crisis by analyzing the electronic messages sent during Hurricane Harvey to guide future disaster planning efforts. Methods We explored patient portal use data from a large Greater Houston area health care system focusing on the initial week of the Hurricane Harvey disaster, beginning with the date of landfall, August 25, 2017, to August 31, 2017. A mixed methods approach was used to assess patients’ immediate health needs and concerns during the disruption of access to routine and emergent medical care. Quantitative analysis used logistic regression models to assess the predictive characteristics of patients using the portal during Hurricane Harvey. This study also included encounters by type (emergency, inpatient, observation, outpatient, and outpatient surgery) and time (before, during, and after Hurricane Harvey). For qualitative analysis, the content of these messages was examined using the constant comparative method to identify emerging themes found within the message texts. Results Out of a total of 557,024 patients, 4079 (0.73%) sent a message during Hurricane Harvey, whereas 31,737 (5.69%) used the portal. Age, sex, race, and ethnicity were predictive factors for using the portal and sending a message during the natural disaster. We found that prior use of the patient portal increased the likelihood of portal use during Hurricane Harvey (odds ratio 13.688, 95% CI 12.929-14.491) and of sending a portal message during the disaster (odds ratio 14.172, 95% CI 11.879-16.907). Having an encounter 4 weeks before or after Hurricane Harvey was positively associated with increased use of the portal and sending a portal message. Patients with encounters during the main Hurricane Harvey week had a higher increased likelihood of portal use across all five encounter types. Qualitative themes included: access, prescription requests, medical advice (chronic conditions, acute care, urgent needs, and Hurricane Harvey–related injuries), mental health, technical difficulties, and provider constraints. Conclusions The patient portal can be a useful tool for communication between patients and providers to address the urgent needs and concerns of patients as a natural disaster unfolds. This was the first known study to include encounter data to understand portal use compared with care provisioning. Prior use was predictive of both portal use and message sending during Hurricane Harvey. These findings could inform the types of demands that may arise in future disaster situations and can serve as the first step in intentionally optimizing patient portal usability for emergency health care management during natural disasters.

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a rapid increase of space in highly infectious disease intensive care units (ICUs). At Houston Methodist Hospital (HMH), a virtual intensive care unit (vICU) was used amid the COVID-19 outbreak. Objective The aim of this paper was to detail the novel adaptations and rapid expansion of the vICU that were applied to achieve patient-centric solutions while protecting staff and patients’ families during the pandemic. Methods The planned vICU implementation was redirected to meet the emerging needs of conversion of COVID-19 ICUs, including alterations to staged rollout timing, virtual and in-person staffing, and scope of application. With the majority of the hospital critical care physician workforce redirected to rapidly expanded COVID-19 ICUs, the non–COVID-19 ICUs were managed by cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, neurosurgeons, and acute care surgeons. HMH expanded the vICU program to fill the newly depleted critical care expertise in the non–COVID-19 units to provide urgent, emergent, and code blue support to all ICUs. Results Virtual family visitation via the Consultant Bridge application, palliative care delivery, and specialist consultation for patients with COVID-19 exemplify the successful adaptation of the vICU implementation. Patients with COVID-19, who were isolated and separated from their families to prevent the spread of infection, were able to virtually see and hear their loved ones, which bolstered the mental and emotional status of those patients. Many families expressed gratitude for the ability to see and speak with their loved ones. The vICU also protected medical staff and specialists assigned to COVID-19 units, reducing exposure and conserving personal protective equipment. Conclusions Telecritical care has been established as an advantageous mechanism for the delivery of critical care expertise during the expedited rollout of the vICU at Houston Methodist Hospital. Overall responses from patients, families, and physicians are in favor of continued vICU care; however, further research is required to examine the impact of innovative applications of telecritical care in the treatment of critically ill patients.

Background In the UK, acute mental healthcare is provided by in-patient wards and crisis resolution teams. Readmission to acute care following discharge is common. Acute day units (ADUs) are also provided in some areas. Aims To assess predictors of readmission to acute mental healthcare following discharge in England, including availability of ADUs. Method We enrolled a national cohort of adults discharged from acute mental healthcare in the English National Health Service (NHS) between 2013 and 2015, determined the risk of readmission to either in-patient or crisis teams, and used multivariable, multilevel logistic models to evaluate predictors of readmission. Results Of a total of 231 998 eligible individuals discharged from acute mental healthcare, 49 547 (21.4%) were readmitted within 6 months, with a median time to readmission of 34 days (interquartile range 10–88 days). Most variation in readmission (98%) was attributable to individual patient-level rather than provider (trust)-level effects (2.0%). Risk of readmission was not associated with local availability of ADUs (adjusted odds ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.80–1.15). Statistically significant elevated risks were identified for participants who were female, older, single, from Black or mixed ethnic groups, or from more deprived areas. Clinical predictors included shorter index admission, psychosis and being an in-patient at baseline. Conclusions Relapse and readmission to acute mental healthcare are common following discharge and occur early. Readmission was not influenced significantly by trust-level variables including availability of ADUs. More support for relapse prevention and symptom management may be required following discharge from acute mental healthcare.

Background Hospital healthcare workers (HCW), in particular those involved in the clinical care of COVID-19 cases, are presumably exposed to a higher risk of acquiring the disease than the general population. Methods Between April 16 and 30, 2020 we conducted a prospective, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study in HCWs in Southern Switzerland. Participants were hospital personnel with varying COVID-19 exposure risk depending on job function and working site. They provided personal information (including age, sex, occupation, and medical history) and self-reported COVID-19 symptoms. Odds ratio (OR) of seropositivity to IgG antibodies was estimated by univariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Findings Among 4726 participants, IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 9.6% of the HCWs. Seropositivity was higher among HCWs working on COVID-19 wards (14.1% (11.9–16.5)) compared to other hospital areas at medium (10.7% (7.6–14.6)) or low risk exposure (7.3% (6.4–8.3)). OR for high vs. medium wards risk exposure was 1.42 (0.91–2.22), P = 0.119, and 1.98 (1.55–2.53), P, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 1, ISSN:2666-7762

Background Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has effected major changes to healthcare delivery within acute care settings. Rapid response calls (RRCs) in healthcare organisations have been effective at identifying and urgently managing acute clinical deterioration. Code-95 RRC were introduced to prewarn healthcare workers (HCWs) attending to patients suspected or confirmed with COVID-19 infection. Aims The primary aim of the study was to identify the personal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HCWs involved in attending Code-95 RRC. We sought to evaluate their perception of risks and effects on wellbeing and identify potential opportunities for improvement at organisational levels. Methods We undertook a detailed survey on HCWs attending Code-95 RRCs, including questions that sought to understand the impact of the pandemic as well as their perception of infection risk and emotional wellbeing. This was a substudy of the prospective cross-sectional single-centre survey of HCWs that was conducted over a 3-week period at Frankston Hospital, Victoria, Australia. We adopted a quantitative content analysis approach for free-text responses in this secondary analysis. Results Four hundred two free-text comments were received from 297 respondents and were analysed. More than two-thirds (68%, 223/297) were female. Of all comments, 39% (155/402) were related to organisational issues including communication, confusion due to constantly changing infection control policies, and insufficient training. Thirty-three percent of comments (133/402) raised issues regarding the adequacy of personal protective equipment. Anxiety was reported in 25% of comments (101/402) with concerns predominantly relating to emotional stress and fatigue, risks of virus exposure and transmitting the infection to others, and COVID-19 precautions impairing care delivery. Conclusion(s) Our study raises important issues that have relevance for all healthcare organisations in the management of patients with COVID-19. These include the importance of improving communication, especially when infection control policies are revised, optimising training, maintaining adequate personal protective equipment, and HCW support. Early recognition and management of these issues are crucial to maintain optimal healthcare delivery.