Search

CONTEXT: The antibiotic susceptibility is the cornerstone for the eradication therapies of Helicobacter pylori. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of primary resistance of H. pylori was evaluated in an urban Brazilian population. METHODS:H. pylori isolates were obtained from patients submitted to an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for the evaluation of dyspeptic symptoms. Biopsies from antrum, corpus and fundus were taken to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of H. pylori isolates. The minimal inhibitory concentration of furazolidone and bismuth were routinely determined by agar dilution method and the minimal inhibitory for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, tetracycline, levofloxacin, and metronidazole were routinely determined with the E-test. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of H. pylori strains were obtained from 39 patients. Resistance to metronidazole was detected in 20 patients (51%), to clarithromycin in 3 patients (8%), to levofloxacin in 9 patients (23%) and to bismuth in 2 patients (5%). There was no observed resistance to amoxicillin, tetracycline or furazolidone. CONCLUSION: Due to the low amoxicillin and clarithromycin resistance observed in this study, therapies using these antimicrobials remain appropriated first-line H. pylori therapy.

BACKGROUND: TREATMEN The contribution of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) to refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains unknown. When EoE and GERD overlap, the clinical, endoscopic and histological findings are nonspecific and cannot be used to distinguish between the two disorders. Limited data are available on this topic, and the interaction between EoE and GERD is a matter of debate. AIM: We have conducted a prospective study of adult patients with refractory GERD to evaluate the overlap of reflux and EoE. METHODS: Between July 2006 and June 2008, we consecutively and prospectively enrolled 130 male and female patients aged 18 to 70 years old who experienced persistent heartburn and/or regurgitation more than twice a week over the last 30 days while undergoing at least six consecutive weeks of omeprazole treatment (at least 40 mg once a day). The patients underwent an upper digestive endoscopy with esophageal biopsy, and intraepithelial eosinophils were counted after hematoxylin/eosin staining. The diagnosis of EoE was based on the presence of 20 or more eosinophils per high-power field (eo/HPF) in esophageal biopsies. RESULTS: Among the 103 studied patients, 79 (76.7%) were females. The patients had a mean age of 45.5 years and a median age of 47 years. Endoscopy was normal in 83.5% of patients, and erosive esophagitis was found in 12.6%. Only one patient presented lesions suggestive of EoE. Histological examination revealed >;20 eo/HPF in this patient. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated a low prevalence of EoE among patients with refractory GERD undergoing omeprazole treatment.

CONTEXT: Whether Helicobacter pylori infection is a protective or predisposing factor for the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease remains controversial. The most virulent strains, such as those expressing the cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), and the site of gastric colonization have been correlated with the prevention or development of esophagitis. AIM: To determine the incidence of erosive esophagitis following eradication of H. pylori in patients with peptic ulcer disease and to evaluate the association of erosive esophagitis with virulent strains of H. pylori and the site of gastric colonization. METHODS: Triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin was administered to 159 patients with peptic ulcer disease. Endoscopy, histopathology, urease and carbon-14 urea breath tests were performed prior to treatment, at 3 months and 1 year following treatment. Genotyping of H. pylori strains using polymerase chain reaction was performed separately on samples from the corpus and antrum. RESULTS: One year after treatment, 148 successfully treated patients were reevaluated. Twenty-eight patients (19%) had erosive esophagitis, classified as Los Angeles grade A in 24 and B in 4. The samples taken from the corpus were CagA-positive in 18 patients (64%), while the samples taken from the antrum were CagA-positive in 21 patients (75%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of erosive esophagitis in peptic ulcer patients who had their H. pylori eradicated was 19%. No correlation was found between the gastric site colonized by H. pylori or strains expressing CagA and the prevention or development of erosive esophagitis in patients with peptic ulcer disease, 1 year after infection eradication.

OBJECTIVES: The eradication of Helicobacter (H.) pylori allows peptic ulcers in patients infected with the bacteria to be cured. Treatment with the classic triple regimen (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) has shown decreased efficacy due to increased bacterial resistance to clarithromycin. In our country, the eradication rate by intention to treat with this regimen is 83%. In Brazil, a commercially available regimen for bacterial eradication that uses levofloxacin and amoxicillin with lansoprazole is available; however, its efficacy is not known. Considering that such a treatment may be an alternative to the classic regimen, we aimed to verify its efficacy in H. pylori eradication. METHODS: Patients with peptic ulcer disease infected with H. pylori who had not received prior treatment were treated with the following regimen: 30 mg lansoprazole bid, 1,000 mg amoxicillin bid and 500 mg levofloxacin, once a day for 7 days. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were evaluated. The patients’ mean age was 52 years, and women comprised 55% of the sample. Duodenal ulcers were present in 50% of cases, and gastric ulcers were present in 30%. The eradication rate was 74% per protocol and 73% by intention to treat. Adverse effects were reported by 49 patients (74%) and were mild to moderate, with a prevalence of diarrhea complaints. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy comprising lansoprazole, amoxicillin and levofloxacin for 7 days for the eradication of H. pylori in Brazilian peptic ulcer patients showed a lower efficacy than that of the classic triple regimen.

A doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE), apresenta significativa variedade de sintomas e sinais esofagianos ou extra-esofagianas. Entre suas complicações, embora pouco freqüentes, estão o esôfago de Barrett e o adenocarcinoma, sendo, portanto, fundamental reconhecer os fatores implicados na etiologia e agravamento da DRGE. Nos últimos anos, tem sido dada maior importância à influência da atividade física na DRGE. Investigações recentes, embora com resultados conflitantes, em sua maioria, apontam para a exacerbação do refluxo gastroesofágico (RGE) durante o exercício físico. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a influência da atividade física na DRGE, por meio do teste ergométrico de esforço (TE), em pacientes portadores de doença erosiva, bem como a relevância do tônus do esfíncter inferior do esôfago (EIE) e do índice de massa corporal (IMC), comparando com um grupo de pacientes portadores da forma não erosiva da doença. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados prospectivamente 29 pacientes portadores de DRGE erosiva e, como grupo controle, 10 pacientes com a doença não erosiva. Todos foram submetidos à avaliação clínica, realização de endoscopia digestiva alta, manometria e pHmetria esofágica. Também realizaram TE precedendo a retirada da sonda de pH-metria. As seguintes variáveis foram avaliadas: eficácia do TE, consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO2max), tempo de refluxo ácido (TRA) e sintomas de RGE durante o TE, influência do tônus do EIE e do IMC na ocorrência de RGE no TE. RESULTADOS: A VO2max demonstrou correlação significativa somente no grupo de pacientes com esofagite erosiva quando esta foi maior ou igual a 70% (p=0,032) durante a realização do TE. As demais variáveis analisadas não demonstraram influência significativa entre a ocorrência de RGE e atividade física (p>0,05). CONCLUSÕES: 1) Atividade física de alta intensidade pode predispor a ocorrência de episódios de refluxo gastroesofágico em portadores de DRGE erosiva; 2) Atividade física de baixa intensidade ou de curta duração não exercem influencia, independentemente do IMC; 3) O tônus do EIE não exerce influência na ocorrência de episódios de RGE durante realização de TE Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a worldwide prevalent condition that exhibits a large variety of signs and symptoms of esophageal or extraesophageal nature and can be related to the adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Therefore, its of crucial importance to recognize the etiologic and aggravating factors of GERD. In the last few years, greater importance has been given to the influence of physical exercises on GERD. Some recent investigations, though showing conflicting results, point to an exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux during physical exercises. Objectives: To evaluate the influence that physical activities can have on GERD patients presenting with erosive and non erosive disease by means of an ergometric stress test and evaluate the influence of the lower esophageal sphincter tonus and body mass index (BMI) during this situation. METHODS: Twenty-nine GERD patients with erosive disease (group I) and 10 patients with non-erosive disease (group II) were prospectively evaluated. All the subjects were submitted to clinical evaluation, followed by upper digestive endoscopy, manometry and 24h esophageal pH monitoring. A stress test was performed 1 hour before removing the esophageal pH probe. During the ergometric stress test, the following variables were analyzed: test efficacy, maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max), duration of acid reflux and gastroesophaeal reflux symptoms and the influence of the lower esophageal sphincter tonus and influence of body mass index (BMI) in the occurrence of GER during these physical stress. RESULTS: VO2 max showed significant correlation when it was 70% or higher only in the group of erosive disease, evaluating the patients with or without acid reflux during the stress test (p = 0,032). The other variables considered didnt show significant correlations between gastroesophageal reflux and physical activity (p > 0,05). CONCLUSIONS: 1) Highly intensive physical activity can predispose the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux episodes in GERD patients with erosive disease. 2) Light or short sessions of physical activity have no influence on reflux, regardless of BMI. 3) The tonus of the lower esophageal sphincter does not influence the occurrence of episodes of GER during exercise testing

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole, an S-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor developed as an optical isomer, and it has shown high healing rates in erosive esophagitis. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of esomeprazole in subjects with erosive esophagitis, according to the Los Angeles classification study design: an open, multi-center clinical study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and eighteen subjects with reflux esophagitis confirmed by endoscopy were included in an open, multi-center study in Brazil. All of them received esomeprazole 40 mg, once daily, for a 4-week period. Subjects who had unhealed esophagitis by week 4 continued the treatment for another 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the healing rates by weeks 4 and 8. The secondary endpoints were the number of patients with symptom resolution by week 4, the number of days to sustained symptom resolution, number of symptom-free days and nights and safety and tolerability of the drug. RESULTS: Healing rates by weeks 4 and 8 were 82% (confidence interval: 77.4%-87.6%) and 96.1% (confidence interval: 93.5% - 98.8%), respectively. Ninety-nine (99%) of the patients had heartburn resolution by week 2. The most common adverse events were headache (4%), diarrhea (2.6%) and epigastric pain (2.2%). CONCLUSION: For the studied period, esomeprazole was shown to be a safe and well-tolerated drug, providing significant healing rates of mucosal breaks, regardless of LA classification, in patients with erosive esophagitis. Esomeprazole was also shown to be effective in quickly relieving symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of a simple, short-term and low-cost eradication treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) using omeprazole, tetracycline, and furazolidone in a Brazilian peptic ulcer population, divided into 2 subgroups: untreated and previously treated for the infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with peptic ulcer disease diagnosed by endoscopic examination and infected by H. pylori diagnosed by the rapid urease test (RUT) and histological examination, untreated and previously unsuccessfully treated by macrolides and nitroimidazole, were medicated with omeprazole 20 mg daily dose and tetracycline 500 mg and furazolidone 200 mg given 3 times a day for 7 days. Another endoscopy or a breath test was performed 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Patients were considered cured of the infection if a RUT and histologic examination proved negative or a breath test was negative for the bacterium. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in the study. The women were the predominant sex (58%); the mean age was 46 years. Thirty-three percent of the patients were tobacco users, and duodenal ulcer was identified in 80% of patients. For the 59 patients that underwent follow-up examinations, eradication was verified in 44 (75%). The eradication rate for the intention-to-treat group was 69%. The incidence of severe adverse effects was 15%. CONCLUSION: The treatment provides good efficacy for H. pylori eradication in patients who were previously treated without success, but it causes severe adverse effects that prevented adequate use of the medications in 15% of the patients.OBJETIVO: Testar a eficácia de um esquema simplificado e de baixo custo para erradicação do H. pylori utilizando omeprazol, tetraciclina e furazolidona, em uma população de ulcerosos do Brasil, já tratados e não tratados previamente para a infecção. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Pacientes portadores de úlcera péptica, documentada por exame endoscópico e infectados pelo H. pylori confirmado pelo teste da urease e exame histológico, não tratados previamente ou já tratados sem sucesso com macrolídeos e nitroimidazólicos, foram tratados com Omeprazol 20mg em dose única diária, associado à Tetraciclina 500mg e Furazolidona 200mg dadas três vezes ao dia, por três dias. Uma nova endoscopia ou um Teste Respiratório foi realizado 12 semanas após o término do tratamento e foram considerados erradicados da infecção os pacientes que apresentaram o teste da urease e exame histológico negativos ou o Teste Respiratório negativo para a bactéria. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e quatro pacientes foram incluídos no estudo, 26 deles não previamente tratados. As mulheres predominaram (58%), a idade média foi de 46 anos, 33% dos pacientes eram tabagistas e a úlcera duodenal foi identificada em 80% dos pacientes. Nos 59 doentes que realizaram o exame de controle, a erradicação foi constatada em 44 (75%). Por intenção de tratamento o índice foi de 68%. O grupo não tratado previamente não diferiu do grupo previamente tratado. A incidência de efeitos adversos intensos foi de 15%. CONCLUSÃO: O esquema proporciona boa eficácia na erradicação do H. pylori em pacientes já previamente tratados sem sucesso, porém apresenta efeitos adversos intensos, que impediu o uso adequado dos medicamentos em 15% dos pacientes.

PURPOSE: To determine the eradication rate of an ultra-short treatment schedule for Helicobacter pylori infection in a population with peptic ulcers, using omeprazole, secnidazole, and azithromycin in a once-daily dose for 3 days. METHODS: Thirty patients with peptic ulcer diagnosed by upper endoscopy and for Helicobacter pylori infection by rapid urease test and histologic examination received omeprazole 40 mg, secnidazole 1000 mg, and azithromycin 500 mg, administered once daily for 3 days. A follow-up exam was performed 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. Patients who were negative for Helicobacter pylori infection by rapid urease test and histologic examination were considered cured. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly female, and the mean age was 50 years. Duodenal peptic ulcer was found in 73% of the patients. Eradication was achieved in 9 of the 28 (32%) patients as determined from the follow-up endoscopic exam. The eradication rate by intention to treat was 30%. Side effects were present in 3% of the patients, and compliance to treatment was total. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the low rate of side effects and good compliance, the eradication index was low. A possible drawback of this therapy is that it reduces the efficacy of macrolide and nitroimidazole compounds in subsequent treatments.OBJETIVO: Testar a eficácia de um esquema ultra-curto de erradicação do H. pylori em uma população de ulcerosos, usando Omeprazol, Secnidazol e Azitromicina em dose única diária por três dias. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Trinta doentes portadores de úlcera péptica, documentada por exame endoscópico e com infecção pelo H. pylori confirmada pelo teste da urease e exame histológico, foram tratados com Omeprazol 40mg, Secnidazol 1000 mg e Azitromicina 500mg dados em dose única diária por três dias. Em controle endoscópico realizado 12 semanas após o término do tratamento, foram considerados curados da infecção os pacientes que apresentaram o teste da urease e exame histológico negativos para a bactéria. RESULTADOS: As mulheres predominaram (63%), a idade média foi de 50 anos e a úlcera duodenal foi identificada em 73% dos pacientes. Nos 28 doentes que realizaram o exame de controle, a erradicação foi constatada em nove (32%). Por intenção de tratamento o índice foi de 30%. A adesão ao tratamento foi total e houve um baixo índice de efeitos adversos (3%). CONCLUSÃO: O esquema apesar de proporcionar alta adesão e poucos efeitos adversos, apresenta baixa taxa de erradicação, mesmo em se considerando um país em desenvolvimento e apresenta como possível agravante comprometer a eficácia de outros macrolídeos e nitroimidazólicos no uso de esquemas de erradicação subseqüentes.

Background : Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a worldwide prevalent condition that exhibits a large variety of signs and symptoms of esophageal or extra-esophageal nature and can be related to the esophagic adenocarcinoma. In the last few years, greater importance has been given to the influence of physical exercises on it. Some recent investigations, though showing conflicting results, point to an exacerbation of gastroesophageal reflux during physical exercises. Aim : To evaluate the influence of physical activities in patients presenting with erosive and non erosive disease by ergometric stress testing and influence of the lower esophageal sphincter tonus and body mass index during this situation. Methods : Twenty-nine patients with erosive disease (group I) and 10 patients with non-erosive disease (group II) were prospectively evaluated. All the patients were submitted to clinical evaluation, followed by upper digestive endoscopy, manometry and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring. An ergometric testing was performed 1 h before removing the esophageal pH probe. During the ergometric stress testing, the following variables were analyzed: test efficacy, maximum oxygen uptake, acid reflux duration, gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, influence of the lower esophageal sphincter tonus and influence of body mass index in the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux during these physical stress. Results : Maximum oxigen consumption or VO 2 max, showed significant correlation when it was 70% or higher only in the erosive disease group, evaluating the patients with or without acid reflux during the ergometric testing (p=0,032). The other considered variables didn't show significant correlations between gastroesophageal reflux and physical activity (p>0,05). Conclusions : 1) Highly intensive physical activity can predispose the occurrence of gastroesophageal reflux episodes in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with erosive disease; 2) light or short sessions of physical activity have no influence on reflux, regardless of body mass index; 3) the lower esophageal sphincter tonus does not influence the occurrence of reflux disease episodes during exercise testing. Racional : A doença do refluxo gastroesofágico é afecção com elevada prevalência em todo o mundo, que apresenta grande variedade de sinais e sintomas esofagianos ou extra-esofágico, podendo ter entre suas complicações o adenocarcinoma esofágico. Nos últimos anos, maior importância tem sido dada à influência dos exercícios físicos na sua patogênese. Algumas investigações recentes, embora com resultados conflitantes, apontam para agravamento do refluxo gastroesofágico durante eles. Objetivos : Avaliar a influência da atividade física em pacientes com doença erosiva e não erosiva através do teste ergométrico de esforço, e ainda, a relevância do tônus do esfíncter esofagiano inferior e do índice de massa corpórea durante esta situação. Métodos : Vinte e nove pacientes com doença do refluxo erosiva (grupo I) e 10 com não-erosiva (grupo II) foram avaliados prospectivamente. Todos foram submetidos à avaliação clínica, seguida pela endoscopia digestiva alta, manometria e pH-metria esofágica de 24 horas. Um teste ergométrico foi realizado uma hora antes de retirar a sonda de pH-metria. Durante ele as seguintes variáveis foram analisadas: eficácia do teste, o consumo máximo de oxigênio ou VO2 max, tempo de refluxo ácido, sintomas de refluxo gastroesofágico, influência do tônus do esfíncter esofágico e do índice de massa corporal na ocorrência de refluxo gastroesofágico durante esta situação. Resultados : VO2 max apresentou correlação significativa, quando foi maior ou igual a 70%, apenas no grupo doença erosiva, avaliando os pacientes com ou sem refluxo ácido durante o teste ergométrico (p=0,032). As demais variáveis consideradas não demostraram correlação significativa entre a ocorrência de refluxo gastroesofágico e a atividade física (p>0,05). Conclusões : 1) Atividade física de alta intensidade pode predispor à ocorrência de episódios de refluxo gastroesofágico em pacientes em portadores da forma erosiva; 2) atividade física de baixa intensidade ou de curta duração não exercem influência, independentemente do índice de massa corpórea; 3) o tônus do esfíncter esofagiano não influencia na ocorrência de episódios de refluxo gastroesofágico durante atividade física.

Triple therapy is accepted as the treatment of choice for H. pylori eradication. In industrialized countries, a proton pump inhibitor plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin or nitroimidazole have shown the best results. Our aims were: 1. To study the eradication rate of the association of a proton pump inhibitor plus tinidazole and clarithromycin on H. pylori infection in our population. 2. To determine if previous treatments, gender, age, tobacco, alcohol use, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) change the response to therapy. METHODS: Two hundred patients with peptic ulcer (upper endoscopy) and H. pylori infection (histology and rapid urease test - RUT) were included. A proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole 30 mg or omeprazole 20 mg), tinidazole 500 mg, and clarithromycin 250 mg were dispensed twice a day for a seven-day period. Eradication was assessed after 10 to 12 weeks of treatment through histology and RUT. RESULTS: The eradication rate of H. pylori per protocol was 65% (128/196 patients). This rate was 53% for previously treated patients, rising to 76% for not previously treated patients, with a statistical difference pO esquema tríplice tem sido demonstrado como sendo o melhor tratamento para a erradicação do Helicobacter pylori. Nos países industrializados o uso de um inibidor de bomba de prótons associado a claritromicina e a amoxicilina ou a um nitroimidazólico, tem proporcionado os melhores resultados. Objetivamos estudar na nossa população a taxa de erradicação do H. pylori para a associação de um inibidor de bomba de prótons com o tinidazol e a claritromicina e determinar se a resposta ao tratamento é influenciada pelo tratamento prévio, sexo, tabagismo, alcoolismo, idade e uso de anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais (AINEs). PACIENTES E PROCEDIMENTOS: Duzentos pacientes com diagnóstico endoscópico de úlcera péptica e com infecção pelo H. pylori, confirmada pelo exame histológico e pelo teste rápido da urease (TRU), foram incluídos no estudo. Um inibidor de bomba de prótons (lansoprazol 30mg ou omeprazol 20 mg), tinidazol 500mg e claritromicina 250mg foram ministrados duas vezes ao dia, por um período de 7 dias. A erradicação era determinada depois de 10 a 12 semanas após o fim do tratamento, por histologia e TRU. RESULTADOS: O percentual de erradicação do H. pylori (por protocolo) foi de 65% (128/196 pacientes). Para pacientes previamente tratados o valor foi de 53%, aumentando para 76% nos pacientes não previamente tratados com diferença estatística (p

Background The treatment for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is complex; full effectiveness is rarely achieved and it has many adverse effects. In developing countries, increased resistance to antibiotics and its cost make eradication more difficult. Probiotics can reduce adverse effects and improve the infection treatment efficacy. If the first-line therapy fails a second-line treatment using tetracycline, furazolidone and proton-pump inhibitors has been effective and low cost in Brazil; however it implies in a lot of adverse effects. The aim of this study was to minimize the adverse effects and increase the eradication rate applying the association of a probiotic compound to second-line therapy regimen. Methods Patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia infected by H. pylori were randomized to treatment with the furazolidone, tetracycline and lansoprazole regimen, twice a day for 7 days. In a double-blind study, patients received placebo or a probiotic compound (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Bifidobacterium bifidum and Streptococcus faecium) in capsules, twice a day for 30 days. A symptom questionnaire was administered in day zero, after completion of antibiotic therapy, after the probiotic use and eight weeks after the end of the treatment. Upper digestive endoscopy, histological assessment, rapid urease test and breath test were performed before and eight weeks after eradication treatment. Results One hundred and seven patients were enrolled: 21 men with active probiotic and 19 with placebo plus 34 women with active probiotic and 33 with placebo comprising a total of 55 patients with active probiotic and 52 with placebo. Fifty-one patients had peptic ulcer and 56 were diagnosed as functional dyspepsia. The per-protocol eradication rate with active probiotic was 89.8% and with placebo, 85.1% (p = 0.49); per intention to treat, 81.8% and 79.6%, respectively (p = 0.53). The rate of adverse effects at 7 days with the active probiotic was 59.3% and 71.2% with placebo (p = 0.20). At 30 days, it was 44.9% and 60.4%, respectively (p = 0.08). Conclusions The use of this probiotic compound compared to placebo in the proposed regimen in Brazilian patients with peptic ulcer or functional dyspepsia showed no significant difference in efficacy or adverse effects. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN04714018

Introduction: The scheme proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin/clarithromycin (PPI/AC) is still the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) infections despite evidence suggesting its failure in up to 20% to 30% of patients . Methodology: This study involved 493 patients who were prescribed omeprazole (20 mg twice a day) or another proton pump inhibitor in equivalent dosage, amoxicillin (1 g twice a day), and clarithromycin (500 mg twice a day) for seven days. Efficacy was determined by negative urease test and absence of H. pylori on gastric biopsy samples twelve weeks after the end of treatment. Safety was defined according to the adverse effects reported. Mean age of the patients was (± SD) 48.96 ± 13, and demographic and clinical data were recorded for correlation with treatment outcomes. Results: Out of 493 patients, 316 (64.1%) presented duodenal ulcer, 111 (22.5%) gastric ulcer, and 66 (14.4%) simultaneous gastric and duodenal ulcers. Additionally, 267 (54.2%) patients had at least one risk factor for peptic ulcer disease, smoking being the most common (99 [36.5%]). Successful eradication was achieved in 408 patients. The eradication rates per protocol, and according to the intention to treat, were 88.8% and 82.7%, respectively. Of 164 (35.5%) patients who presented adverse effects, 100 (61%) reported them as mild and only six (3.7%) patients had to discontinue treatment. Previous use of tobacco and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs was the only risk factor for treatment failure ( P 0.00). Conclusion: PPI/AC is still a valuable and remarkably tolerable option for first-line H. pylori eradication in Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: Several aspects of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been studied, but the frequency of comorbidities is not yet fully understood. OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of GERD comorbidities in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: We prospectively studied 670 consecutive adult patients from the outpatient department of our facility. A diagnosis was established using clinical, endoscopic and/or pHmetry-related findings. Each patient's medical file was reviewed with respect to the presence of other medical conditions and diagnoses. RESULTS: Of the 670 patients, 459 (68.6%) were female, and the mean age was 55.94 (17-80 years). We registered 316 patients (47.1%) with the erosive form of GERD and 354 patients (52.9%) with the non-erosive form. A total of 1,664 instances of comorbidities were recorded in 586 patients (87.5%), with the most common being arterial hypertension (21%), hypercholesterolemia (9%), obesity (9%), type II diabetes mellitus (5%) and depression (4%). Two or more comorbidities were present in 437 individuals (64.8%). The occurrence of comorbidities increased with age and was higher in patients with the non-erosive form of GERD. CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary referral population, comorbidities were very common, and these may have worsened the already impaired health-related quality of life of these patients. Clinicians caring for GERD patients in this setting must be aware of the likelihood and nature of comorbid disorders and their impact on disease presentation and patient management.

PURPOSE: Many of the currently used eradication regimens against Helicobacter pylori fail to cure the infection either due to antimicrobial resistance or to poor patient compliance. The infection leads to increased risk of developing potentially severe complications, such as gastric cancer. This study was aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety of a quadruple therapy with furazolidone for H. pylori retreatment. METHODS: Patients who had failed one or more eradication regimens against H. pylori infection underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Biopsy specimens were taken from the gastric antrum and corpus for histology and for a urease test and. Patients received omeprazole 20 mg, bismuth citrate 240 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, and furazolidone 200 mg, all twice daily for 7 days. Therapeutic success was evaluated by endoscopy and biopsies 8 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Sixty two patients were enrolled, and 58 completed the study. Under this protocol, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 39/58 patients (67%). Mild adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The short quadruple therapy course with furazolidone is well tolerated, inexpensive, and effective in retreatment for H. pylori infection. It is a good option for developing countries. OBJETIVO: Muitos dos esquemas atualmente usados na erradicação do Helicobacter pylori não conseguem curar a infecção, pela resistência bacteriana ou pela baixa adesão do paciente. Esta condição manterá os riscos de desenvolvimento das potenciais complicações graves da infecção. Este estudo procurou determinar a eficácia e segurança de um esquema quádruplo que associou a furazolidona para o retratamento da infecção pelo H. pylori. MÉTODOS: Pacientes que não alcançaram erradicação em um ou mais tratamentos foram submetidos à endoscopia digestiva alta e dois fragmentos do antro e do corpo foram retirados para exame histológico e de urease. Receberam então 20mg de omeprazol, 240mg de sub-citrato de bismuto, 500mg de tetraciclina e 200mg de furazolidona duas vezes ao dia por 7 dias. O sucesso terapêutico foi determinado pela negativação de nova biópsia endoscópica, após 8 semanas do tratamento. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e dois pacientes foram incluídos, cinqüenta e oito completaram o estudo. Por protocolo, 67% (39/58) dos pacientes conseguiram a erradicação da bactéria. Efeitos adversos leves foram relatados. CONCLUSÃO: O tratamento de curto prazo, em esquema quádruplo com a furazolidona , é bem tolerado, barato e eficaz no re-tratamento do H. pylori. Uma boa opção de re-tratamento para países em desenvolvimento.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological aspects of heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease have been object of growing interest in the last decade because of its increasing prevalence and the complications of the disease. AIMS: To evaluate the prevalence of heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease as well as their main characteristics in the Brazilian urban population. METHODS: A national inquire enrolling 13,959 adults was conducted in 22 Brazilian cities. The inclusion criteria were the presence of heartburn at least once a week ("heartburn group") and age greater than 16 years old. Individuals with heartburn with frequency of more than once a week were considered as having gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD group). Factors related to the complaint were asked such as predisposing factors, habits (tobacco, alcohol and coffee intake) and body mass index. In this populational study a probabilistic model was used. RESULTS: The results are presented in absolute and relative frequency, which were ponderated estimates of the respective population figures. The global prevalence of heartburn was 11.9% (1,651 persons). Heartburn once a week was present in 4.6% (637 persons) and GERD in 7.3% (1,014 persons). The average ages of both groups were similar (men: 36.9 ± 15.0; women: 39.6 ± 15.1 yrs). Females were more affected in both groups. The occurrence of GERD increased with age and was more prevalent after 55 years old. The body mass index was in the normal range and similar in both groups (men: 24.7 ± 4.6; women: 25.3 ± 5.2 kg/m²). In both groups the individuals related their symptoms to food intake, fatty and spicy foods (heartburn group: 64.7%, 28.5%, 17.7%; GERD group: 55.0%, 25.9%, 11.7% respectively). In GERD group, stress (24.2%), health problems (22.3%) were more related to the symptoms than in heartburn group (20.0% and 15.0% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence of heartburn (11.9%) is relatively high in the Brazilian urban population, although lower than the reported figure to other countries. Heartburn and GERD have higher prevalence in women and both are related to food intake, fatty and spicy foods; GERD is more prevalent in individuals older than 35 years old. RACIONAL: Os aspectos epidemiológicos da azia e da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico tem sido objeto de interesse crescente na última década devido o aumento na prevalência e nas complicações da doença. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar a prevalência da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico e da azia e as principais características da doença na população urbana do Brasil. MÉTODOS: Inquérito nacional avaliou 13.959 indivíduos em 22 cidades brasileiras. Os critérios de inclusão foram:presença de azia, pelo menos, uma vez na semana e idade maior de 16 anos (grupo azia); presença de azia com freqüência maior que uma vez na semana, considerado como portadores da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (grupo DRGE). Os fatores relacionados às queixas foram questionados como: fatores precipitantes; hábitos (tabaco, álcool e consumo de café); índice de massa corporal . Neste estudo populacional foi usado modelo probabilístico na analise estatística. RESULTADOS: Foram apresentados em freqüência relativa e absoluta, que era a estimativa ponderada da respectiva população. A prevalência global da azia foi de 11,9% (1.651 indivíduos). Azia uma vez por semana esteve presente em 4,6% (637 indivíduos) e doença do refluxo gastroesofágico em 7,7% (1.014 indivíduos). A idade média foi semelhante em ambos os grupos (homens: 36,9 ± 15,0; mulheres: 39,6 ± 15,1 anos). As mulheres foram mais afetadas em ambos os grupos. A ocorrência de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico aumentou com a idade e foi mais prevalente após os 55 anos de idade. O índice de massa corporal esteve na faixa normal e foi similar em ambos os grupos (homens: 24,7 ± 4,6; mulheres: 25,3 ± 5,2 kg/m²). Em ambos os grupos os indivíduos relataram seus sintomas à ingestão de comida, gorduras e alimentos picantes (grupo azia: 64,7%, 28,5%, 17,7%; grupo DRGE: 55,0%, 25,9%, 11,7%, respectivamente). No grupo DRGE, estresse (24,2%) e problemas de saúde (22,3%) foram os sintomas mais relatados que no grupo azia (20,0% e 15,0%, respectivamente). CONCLUSÕES: A prevalência global de azia (11,9%) é relativamente elevada na população urbana brasileira, apesar de mais baixa em comparação a outros paises. Azia e doença do refluxo gastroesofágico têm maior prevalência em mulheres e ambos são relacionados à ingestão de alimentos, alimentos gordurosos e picantes. A doença do refluxo gastroesofágico é mais freqüente em indivíduos maiores que 35 anos.

BACKGROUND: Many of the currently used Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens fail to cure the infection due to either antimicrobial resistance or poor patient compliance. Those patients will remain at risk of developing potentially severe complications of peptic ulcer disease. AIM: We studied the impact of the antimicrobial resistance on the efficacy of a short course pantoprazole based triple therapy in a single-center pilot study. METHODS: Forty previously untreated adult patients (age range 20 to 75 years, 14 males) infected with Helicobacter pylori and with inactive or healing duodenal ulcer disease were assigned in this open cohort study to 1 week twice daily treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg, plus clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg. Helicobacter pylori was assessed at entry and 50 ± 3 days after the end of treatment by rapid urease test, culture and histology of gastric biopsies. The criteria for eradication was a negative result in the tests. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to clarithromycin and metronidazole was determined before treatment with the disk diffusion test. RESULTS: One week treatment and follow up were complete in all patients. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori was achieved in 35/40 patients (87.5%) and was higher in patients with nitroimidazole-susceptible strains [susceptible: 20/20 (100%), resistant: 10/15 (67%)]. There were six (15%) mild adverse events reports. CONCLUSIONS: A short course of pantoprazole-based triple therapy is well tolerated and effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. The baseline metronidazole resistance may be a significant limiting factor in treatment success.

CONTEXT: The curative treatment of peptic ulcer is made available nowadays through the eradication of the bacterium Helicobacter pylori, which is associated with it, but the best therapeutic regimen is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a therapeutic regimen with 400 mg ranitidine bismuth citrate associated with 500 mg clarithromycin given twice a day for seven days in a cohort of Brazilian patients with peptic ulcer. TYPE OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and twenty nine outpatients, with active or healed peptic ulcers infected by Helicobacter pylori, diagnosed via endoscopy with confirmation via the urease test and histological examination, who had never undergone a regimen for the eradication of the bacterium. PROCEDURE: Administration of 400 mg ranitidine-bismuth and 500 mg clarithromycin twice a day, for seven days. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy of the treatment, with a check on the cure done via another endoscopy eight weeks after drug administration. The eradication of the bacterium was determined via the urease test and histological examination. Patients who were negative for both were considered to be cured. RESULTS: Eight patients failed to complete the study. The eradication rate according to intention to treat was 81% (104/129) and per protocol was 86% (104/121). CONCLUSION: The bismuth ranitidine compound associated with clarithromycin used for one week was shown to be a simple, effective and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. CONTEXTO: O tratamento curativo da úlcera péptica é proporcionado atualmente pela erradicação da bactéria Helicobacter pylori, a ela associada, mas o melhor esquema de erradicação ainda não está determinado. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia de um esquema terapêutico com citrato de bismuto ranitidina 400 mg associado a claritromicina 500 mg, ministrados duas vezes ao dia por sete dias em uma população de ulcerosos brasileiros. TIPO DE ESTUDO: Estudo transversal. LOCAL: hospital de atenção terciária. PARTICIPANTES: 129 pacientes ambulatoriais, portadores de úlcera péptica ativa ou cicatrizada, diagnosticados por endoscopia e com infecção pelo Helicobacter pylori confirmada pelo teste da urease e exame histológico, que nunca foram submetidos a tratamento para erradicação da bactéria. PROCEDIMENTO: Administração dos medicamentos citrato de bismuto ranitidina 400 mg e claritromicina 500 mg duas vezes ao dia, durante sete dias. VARIÁVEIS ESTUDADAS: Eficácia de tratamento com o controle de cura em nova endoscopia realizada oito semanas após o uso dos medicamentos. A erradicação da bactéria foi determinada pelo teste da urease e por histologia, sendo considerados curados os pacientes com resultados negativos para os dois exames. RESULTADOS: Oito pacientes não completaram o estudo. O índice de erradicação por intenção de tratamento foi de 81% (104/129) e por protocolo, 86% (104/121). CONCLUSÃO: O composto bismuto-ranitidina, associado à claritromicina, utilizado por uma semana, mostrou ser um esquema bastante simples, eficaz e bem tolerado para a erradicação do Helicobacter pylori.

PURPOSE: To determine the eradication rate of an ultra-short treatment schedule for Helicobacter pylori infection in a population with peptic ulcers, using omeprazole, secnidazole, and azithromycin in a once-daily dose for 3 days. METHODS: Thirty patients with peptic ulcer diagnosed by upper endoscopy and for Helicobacter pylori infection by rapid urease test and histologic examination received omeprazole 40 mg, secnidazole 1000 mg, and azithromycin 500 mg, administered once daily for 3 days. A follow-up exam was performed 12 weeks after the end of the treatment. Patients who were negative for Helicobacter pylori infection by rapid urease test and histologic examination were considered cured. RESULTS: Patients were predominantly female, and the mean age was 50 years. Duodenal peptic ulcer was found in 73% of the patients. Eradication was achieved in 9 of the 28 (32%) patients as determined from the follow-up endoscopic exam. The eradication rate by intention to treat was 30%. Side effects were present in 3% of the patients, and compliance to treatment was total. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the low rate of side effects and good compliance, the eradication index was low. A possible drawback of this therapy is that it reduces the efficacy of macrolide and nitroimidazole compounds in subsequent treatments. OBJETIVO: Testar a eficácia de um esquema ultra-curto de erradicação do H. pylori em uma população de ulcerosos, usando Omeprazol, Secnidazol e Azitromicina em dose única diária por três dias. PACIENTES E MÉTODOS: Trinta doentes portadores de úlcera péptica, documentada por exame endoscópico e com infecção pelo H. pylori confirmada pelo teste da urease e exame histológico, foram tratados com Omeprazol 40mg, Secnidazol 1000 mg e Azitromicina 500mg dados em dose única diária por três dias. Em controle endoscópico realizado 12 semanas após o término do tratamento, foram considerados curados da infecção os pacientes que apresentaram o teste da urease e exame histológico negativos para a bactéria. RESULTADOS: As mulheres predominaram (63%), a idade média foi de 50 anos e a úlcera duodenal foi identificada em 73% dos pacientes. Nos 28 doentes que realizaram o exame de controle, a erradicação foi constatada em nove (32%). Por intenção de tratamento o índice foi de 30%. A adesão ao tratamento foi total e houve um baixo índice de efeitos adversos (3%). CONCLUSÃO: O esquema apesar de proporcionar alta adesão e poucos efeitos adversos, apresenta baixa taxa de erradicação, mesmo em se considerando um país em desenvolvimento e apresenta como possível agravante comprometer a eficácia de outros macrolídeos e nitroimidazólicos no uso de esquemas de erradicação subseqüentes.

Triple therapy is accepted as the treatment of choice for H. pylori eradication. In industrialized countries, a proton pump inhibitor plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin or nitroimidazole have shown the best results. Our aims were: 1. To study the eradication rate of the association of a proton pump inhibitor plus tinidazole and clarithromycin on H. pylori infection in our population. 2. To determine if previous treatments, gender, age, tobacco, alcohol use, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) change the response to therapy. METHODS: Two hundred patients with peptic ulcer (upper endoscopy) and H. pylori infection (histology and rapid urease test - RUT) were included. A proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole 30 mg or omeprazole 20 mg), tinidazole 500 mg, and clarithromycin 250 mg were dispensed twice a day for a seven-day period. Eradication was assessed after 10 to 12 weeks of treatment through histology and RUT. RESULTS: The eradication rate of H. pylori per protocol was 65% (128/196 patients). This rate was 53% for previously treated patients, rising to 76% for not previously treated patients, with a statistical difference p

To determine the prevalences of symptoms consistent with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia in South America.A telephone survey was conducted among adult owners of land-based telephones in São Paulo, Brazil, using previously validated computer-assisted sampling and survey protocols. The Portuguese-language survey included (1) sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., weight, height, smoking) and comorbidities; (2) dietary habits; (3) presence of symptoms consistent with GERD or dyspepsia within the prior 3 mo; and (4) use of medications and other therapies to manage symptoms. Data were stratified post-hoc into three homogeneous geographical regions of São Paulo according to the Social Exclusion Indices of the districts and postal codes. Survey response data from each respondent were weighted by the numbers of adults and landline telephones in each household. The analyses were weighted to account for sampling design and to be representative of the São Paulo population according to city census data.Among 4570 households contacted, an adult from 3050 (66.7%) agreed to participate. The nonresponse rate was 33.3%. The mean (SE) respondent age was 42.6 (16.0) years. More than half of all respondents were women (53.1%), aged 18 through 49 years (66.7%), married or cohabitating (52.5%), and/or above normal-weight standards (i.e., 35.3% overweight and 16.3% obese). A total of 26.5% of women were perimenopausal. More than 20% of respondents reported highly frequent symptoms consistent with GERD (e.g., gastric burning sensation = 20.8%) or dyspepsia (e.g., abdominal swelling/distension = 20.9%) at least once per month. Prevalences of these symptoms were significantly (approximately 1.5- to 2.0-fold) higher among women than men but did not vary significantly as a function of advancing age. For instance, 14.1% of women reported that they experienced stomach burning (symptom of GERD) at least twice per week, compared to 8.4% of men (P = 0.012 by χ(2) test). A total of 15.7% of women reported that they experienced abdominal swelling (symptom of dyspepsia) at least twice per week, compared to 6.4% of men (P0.001 by χ(2) test). Despite frequent manifestations of GERD or dyspepsia, most (≥ 90%) respondents reported that they neither received prescription medications from physicians, nor took behavioral measures (e.g., dietary modifications), to manage symptoms.Symptoms consistent with dyspepsia and GERD are prevalent in Brazil and represent major public-health and clinical challenges.

Introduction: Refractory GERD describes those patients who continue to have symptoms despite treatment with proton-pump inhibitors (PPI)1. The participation of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) in the refractory GERD has been scarcely studied. When both disorders are simultaneously present, the clinical, endoscopic and histologic findings may be nonspecific and as such the overlap of refractory GERD and EE has been matter of debate. Aim: To study the occurrence of EE in patients with refractory GERD. Methods: Upper digestive endoscopies (UDE) were performed, obtaining mucosal biopsies of distal, middle and lower esophagus and stomach (body and antrum) in 97 adult consecutive patients. Erosive esophagitis was classified according to Los Angeles classification. Seventy three (75.3%) were female, with mean age of 44,4 (+ 9.09) of years. Eighty seven patients (89.6%) were submitted to esophageal manometry and pHmetry. The patients (82, 84%) have been receiving high doses of PPI (40 mg omeprazol b.i.d.) for at least 6 weeks. The main complaint was heartburn and regurgitation. The diagnosis of GERD was based on UDE and pHmetry. The diagnosis of EE was based on the presence of ≥20 eosinophils per high power field (eo/hpf) in the esophageal biopsies. Results: UDE was normal in 78 patients (81%). Erosive esophagitis (grade A in 9, B in 2 and C in 2 of LA) was found in 13 (13%) patients. All the others 6 (6%) were classified as non-erosive esophagitis (NERD). One patient ( 1 %) presented > 20 eo/hpf. In 25 (27.8%) patients the pHmetry was altered during PPI treatment (80 mg/day). The manometry showed hypomotility before the treatment for EE and, inespecific motor disturbances after the decreasing of eosinophils post the appropriate treatment. Conclusions: There was a very low prevalence of EE in patients with refractory GERD. (1) Spechler SNat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2007