Search

MRI and clinical features of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody disease may overlap with those of other inflammatory demyelinating conditions posing diagnostic challenges, especially in non-acute phases and when serologic testing for MOG antibodies is unavailable or shows uncertain results. We aimed to identify MRI and clinical markers that differentiate non-acute MOG-antibody disease from aquaporin 4 (AQP4)-antibody neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, guiding in the identification of patients with MOG-antibody disease in clinical practice. In this cross-sectional retrospective study, data from 16 MAGNIMS centres were included. Data collection and analyses were conducted from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria were: diagnosis of MOG-antibody disease; AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and multiple sclerosis; brain and cord MRI at least 6 months from relapse; and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score on the day of MRI. Brain white matter T2 lesions, T1-hypointense lesions, cortical and cord lesions were identified. Random forest models were constructed to classify patients as MOG-antibody disease/AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder/multiple sclerosis; a leave one out cross-validation procedure assessed the performance of the models. Based on the best discriminators between diseases, we proposed a guide to target investigations for MOG-antibody disease. One hundred and sixty-two patients with MOG-antibody disease [99 females, mean age: 41 (±14) years, median EDSS: 2 (0–7.5)], 162 with AQP4-neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder [132 females, mean age: 51 (±14) years, median EDSS: 3.5 (0–8)], 189 with multiple sclerosis (132 females, mean age: 40 (±10) years, median EDSS: 2 (0–8)] and 152 healthy controls (91 females) were studied. In young patients (

Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience information processing speed (IPS) deficits, and the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) has been recommended as a valid screening test. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has markedly improved the understanding of the mechanisms associated with cognitive deficits in MS. However, which structural MRI markers are the most closely related to cognitive performance is still unclear. We used the multicenter 3T-MRI data set of the Italian Neuroimaging Network Initiative to extract multimodal data (i.e., demographic, clinical, neuropsychological, and structural MRIs) of 540 MS patients. We aimed to assess, through machine learning techniques, the contribution of brain MRI structural volumes in the prediction of IPS deficits when combined with demographic and clinical features. We trained and tested the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model following a rigorous validation scheme to obtain reliable generalization performance. We carried out a classification and a regression task based on SDMT scores feeding each model with different combinations of features. For the classification task, the model trained with thalamus, cortical gray matter, hippocampus, and lesions volumes achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74. For the regression task, the model trained with cortical gray matter and thalamus volumes, EDSS, nucleus accumbens, lesions, and putamen volumes, and age reached a mean absolute error of 0.95. In conclusion, our results confirmed that damage to cortical gray matter and relevant deep and archaic gray matter structures, such as the thalamus and hippocampus, is among the most relevant predictors of cognitive performance in MS.

Harmonization; MRI; Multiple sclerosis Harmonització; Ressonància magnètica; Esclerosi múltiple Armonización; Resonancia magnética; Esclerosis múltiple There is an increasing need of sharing harmonized data from large, cooperative studies as this is essential to develop new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. In the field of multiple sclerosis (MS), the issue has become of paramount importance due to the need to translate into the clinical setting some of the most recent MRI achievements. However, differences in MRI acquisition parameters, image analysis and data storage across sites, with their potential bias, represent a substantial constraint. This review focuses on the state of the art, recent technical advances, and desirable future developments of the harmonization of acquisition, analysis and storage of large-scale multicentre MRI data of MS cohorts. Huge efforts are currently being made to achieve all the requirements needed to provide harmonized MRI datasets in the MS field, as proper management of large imaging datasets is one of our greatest opportunities and challenges in the coming years. Recommendations based on these achievements will be provided here. Despite the advances that have been made, the complexity of these tasks requires further research by specialized academical centres, with dedicated technical and human resources. Such collective efforts involving different professional figures are of crucial importance to offer to MS patients a personalised management while minimizing consumption of resources.

The original version of the published Article listed the incorrect affiliations for Jorge Cardoso, Carole H. Sudre, and Sebastien Ourselin. These authors’ affiliations are now correctly noted as School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK. Additionally, a statement from the Acknowledgments section was omitted. The Acknowledgments have been updated to include the following: “We are grateful to the MS Society for its support of the Multiple Sclerosis Research Centre at the Queen Square Institute of Neurology where this work was completed.” The HTML and PDF versions of the Article have been corrected.

Background In multiple sclerosis (MS), determination of regional brain atrophy is clinically relevant. However, analysis of large datasets is rare because of the increased variability in multicenter data. Purpose To compare different methods to correct for center effects. To investigate regional gray matter (GM) volume in relapsing-remitting MS in a large multicenter dataset. Methods MRI scans of 466 MS patients and 279 healthy controls (HC) were retrieved from the Italian Neuroimaging Network Initiative repository. Voxel-based morphometry was performed. The center effect was accounted for with different methods: (a) no correction, (b) factor in the statistical model, (c) ComBat method and (d) subsampling procedure to match single-center distributions. By applying the best correction method, GM atrophy was assessed in MS patients vs HC and according to clinical disability, disease duration and T-2 lesion volume. Results were assessed voxel-wise using general linear model. Results The average residuals for the harmonization methods were 5.03 (a), 4.42 (b), 4.26 (c) and 2.98 (d). The comparison between MS patients and HC identified thalami and other deep GM nuclei, the cerebellum and several cortical regions. At single-center analysis, the thalami were always involved, whereas different other regions were found in each center. Cerebellar atrophy correlated with clinical disability, while deep GM nuclei atrophy correlated with T-2-lesion volume. Conclusion Harmonization based on subsampling more effectively decreased the residuals of the statistical model applied. In comparison with findings from single-center analysis, the multicenter results were more robust, highlighting the importance of data repositories from multiple centers.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0127-8.].