Search

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery typically involves posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using rods contoured by the surgeon, which may be time-consuming and may not reliably restore optimal sagittal alignment. However, pre-contoured patient-specific rods may more optimally restore sagittal spinal alignment. This study evaluates the radiographic outcomes of AIS patients who underwent PSF utilizing surgeon contoured vs. pre-contoured rods., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of AIS patients who underwent PSF with either surgeon contoured or pre-contoured rods. Demographics, Lenke classification, fused levels, osteotomies, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time were also obtained via chart review. Coronal curve magnitude, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were obtained pre-operatively, postoperatively and at last follow up. Outcome measures included rate of achievement of postoperative radiographic alignment goals (TK between 20 and 40 degrees, PI-LL mismatch within 10 degrees, and TPA <14 degrees). Predicted post-operative sagittal alignment was also compared with observed measurements. Student's and paired t -tests were performed to determine significant mean differences for continuous variables, and chi-square for categorical variables., Results: No differences were found in demographics, Lenke classification, preop radiographic measurements, fused levels, osteotomies, EBL, and surgical time in the surgeon contoured cohort (n=36; average follow up 11.3 months) and pre-contoured cohort (n=22; average follow up 9.7 months). At last follow up, 95.5% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 61.1% of patients with surgeon contoured rods (P=0.004) met TK goal. During assessment of first standing postoperative X-ray, 72.7% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 33.3% of patients with surgeon contoured rods met PI-LL mismatch goal (P=0.004). Other radiographic measurements were similar. Artificial intelligence (AI) predicted and observed differences for the pre-contoured group were 3.7 for TK (P=0.005), -7.6 for PI-LL mismatch (P=0.002), and -2.6 for TPA (P=0.11)., Conclusions: AI and pre-contoured rods help achieve global sagittal balance with high accuracy and improved kyphosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch than surgeon contoured rods in AIS patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-24-1/coif). D.T. receives consulting fees from Orthopediatric and DepuySynthes. He also reports Committee Membership in Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America and Scoliosis Research. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printed guides are finding increasing applications in the field of orthopaedic surgery and more recently spine surgery. This retrospective cohort study compares benefits and costs of 3D printed guides in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) compared to freehand techniques., Methods: Intraoperative screw placement was conducted either with 3D printed guides (3D cohort) or traditional freehand technique (freehand cohort) for AIS patients undergoing spinal fusion at a single institution. Patient and perioperative data include: screw placement time, length of surgery, blood loss, hospital stay, spinal curvature correction, total implant costs and training level of surgical assist. Multivariate analysis assessed for confounding and effect modification. P-values <0.05 were considered significant., Results: There were 29 patients included in analyses, 18 in the 3D and 11 in the freehand (FH) cohort, for a total of 263 3D and 307 freehand screws. Between cohorts, there were no significant differences in patient age (P=0.93), gender (P=0.15), height (P=0.18) or weight (P=0.40). The 3D cohort (mean $26,215, SD =$6,374) had significantly higher implant costs than FH (mean $18,660, SD =$5,587, P=0.003) with significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (mean 559 mL, SD =273 FH; vs. mean 357 mL, SD =123 3D; P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, surgical residents had significantly faster screw placement times when using 3D guides (P<0.001) than when placing screws freehand. There were no significant differences between cohorts in length of postoperative hospitalization, spinal levels fused, or coronal or sagittal curve correction., Conclusions: At significant cost, 3D printed guides reduce intraoperative blood loss compared to freehand pedicle screw placement and reduce screw placement time for surgical residents., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-22-28/coif). DAT serves on the wellness committee for the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) and the quality safety and value committee for the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS). DAT also receives money for lectures and teaching from OrthoPediatrics and is a consultant for Depuy Synthes. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)