Pre-contoured patient-specific rods result in superior immediate sagittal plane alignment than surgeon contoured rods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery typically involves posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using rods contoured by the surgeon, which may be time-consuming and may not reliably restore optimal sagittal alignment. However, pre-contoured patient-specific rods may more optimally restore sagittal spinal alignment. This study evaluates the radiographic outcomes of AIS patients who underwent PSF utilizing surgeon contoured vs. pre-contoured rods.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of AIS patients who underwent PSF with either surgeon contoured or pre-contoured rods. Demographics, Lenke classification, fused levels, osteotomies, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time were also obtained via chart review. Coronal curve magnitude, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were obtained pre-operatively, postoperatively and at last follow up. Outcome measures included rate of achievement of postoperative radiographic alignment goals (TK between 20 and 40 degrees, PI-LL mismatch within 10 degrees, and TPA <14 degrees). Predicted post-operative sagittal alignment was also compared with observed measurements. Student's and paired t -tests were performed to determine significant mean differences for continuous variables, and chi-square for categorical variables.
Results: No differences were found in demographics, Lenke classification, preop radiographic measurements, fused levels, osteotomies, EBL, and surgical time in the surgeon contoured cohort (n=36; average follow up 11.3 months) and pre-contoured cohort (n=22; average follow up 9.7 months). At last follow up, 95.5% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 61.1% of patients with surgeon contoured rods (P=0.004) met TK goal. During assessment of first standing postoperative X-ray, 72.7% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 33.3% of patients with surgeon contoured rods met PI-LL mismatch goal (P=0.004). Other radiographic measurements were similar. Artificial intelligence (AI) predicted and observed differences for the pre-contoured group were 3.7 for TK (P=0.005), -7.6 for PI-LL mismatch (P=0.002), and -2.6 for TPA (P=0.11).
Conclusions: AI and pre-contoured rods help achieve global sagittal balance with high accuracy and improved kyphosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch than surgeon contoured rods in AIS patients.
Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-24-1/coif). D.T. receives consulting fees from Orthopediatric and DepuySynthes. He also reports Committee Membership in Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America and Scoliosis Research. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
(2024 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)