Search

[english] Actinic keratosis is one of the most commonly treated skin conditions. A number of studies have recently been published on the treatment of this ailment using photodynamic therapy. The authors of this letter are concerned about the interpretation of some of these studies and would like to outline possible misinterpretations which may arise due to an incomplete analysis of the study reports available. Clearly, the “ideal” therapy for actinic keratosis should be a carefully chosen compromise between undesired side-effects and therapeutic efficacy and needs to be based on a consideration of all of the relevant clinical studies.[german] Aktinische Keratosen gehören zu den meistbehandelten Hautschäden. Eine Reihe der in den letzten Jahren veröffentlichten Studien beschäftigte sich mit ihrer Behandlung durch photodynamische Therapie. Die Bewertungen einiger dieser Studien veranlassten die Autoren dieses Briefes, mögliche Missinterpretationen der Daten herauszustellen, die infolge unvollständiger Analyse der einbezogenen Studienberichte und unvollständiger Berücksichtigung ihrer Randbedingungen auftreten können. Unbestritten ist dabei, dass die „ideale“ Therapie der aktinischen Keratose ein sorgfältig abgewogener Kompromiss zwischen therapeutischer Wirkung und unerwünschter Nebenwirkung sein muss, der auf der Berücksichtigung aller relevanten klinischen Studien und ihrer Randbedingungen basiert.

Purpose: Tumor perfusion is considered to be the principal factor determining the build-up of therapeutically effective thermal fields. This assumes that malignancies have lower perfusions than their homologous tissues. This assumption, however, ignores the fact that several tumor types have higher perfusions than their healthy counterparts. Additionally, flow changes upon hyperthermia (39–43 °C) are non-predictable and extremely heterogeneous. Therefore, modeling temperature distribution further requires a more robust parameter, different in malignancies and healthy tissues, i.e., water content (Cw), which highly determines thermal properties upon electromagnetic irradiation. Method: Systematic literature reviews of Cw and specific heat capacities (cp) were conducted up to 28 February 2022, providing an updated, comprehensive data overview based on original manuscripts, reviews and databases. Results: Cw- and cp-values of cancers and their corresponding healthy tissues are presented. Strong correlations between these two parameters are described. In general, malignant tumors have distinctly higher Cw values than their homologous tissues. With increasing Cw in low-water-content normal tissues (<70 wt.%), cp rises exponentially from 1.5 to 3.3 J·g–1·K–1. In high-water-content normal tissues (≥70 wt.%), cp increases linearly from 3.5 to 3.8 J·g–1·K–1. In malignant tumors (>80 wt.%), cp rises linearly from 3.6 to 3.9 J·g–1·K–1. Cancers contain up to 27% more water than their tissues of origin and must be considered as ‘high-capacitance-tissues’. Conclusions: Hyperhydration of cancers result in higher cp-values, causing cancers to be better heat reservoirs than corresponding normal tissues upon electromagnetic irradiation. Reliable, tissue-/cancer-specific cp values must be considered when modeling temperature distributions in hyperthermic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ultraviolet irradiation represents a well-established treatment modality for inflammatory skin diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of ultraviolet B radiation-induced keratinocyte insensitivity towards interferon-gamma. Flow cytometric analyses indicated that ultraviolet B radiation temporarily inhibits the interferon-gamma-induced activation of primary keratinocyte and HaCaT cells as measured by reduced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD54) and HLA-DR upregulation. Western blot experiments have suggested that this is mediated by the ultraviolet B radiation-induced inhibition of signal transduction and transcription factor-1 phosphorylation. Neither interleukin-10 neutralization nor interleukin-10 addition had any effect on the ultraviolet B radiation-induced inhibition of interferon-gamma induced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression. Furthermore, the supernatant from ultraviolet B-irradiated cells failed to inhibit the interferon-gamma-induced CD54 and HLA-DR upregulation in nonradiated HaCaT cells. Moreover, irradiated cells from whom the supernatant was withdrawn 4 h after irradiation still showed a diminished interferon-gamma-induced response after 24 h. Thus, not soluble but intracellular factors might be involved in the ultraviolet B radiation-induced inhibition of interferon-gamma-induced keratinocyte activation. Therefore, we analyzed the expression of members of suppressors of cytokine-signaling (SOCS) molecules using real-time polymerase chain reaction. We found a fast and strong upregulation of SOCS1 and SOCS3 but not of SOCS2 after ultraviolet B radiation. Similarly, ultraviolet B radiation induced the expression of these particular SOCS molecules in lesional psoriatic skin. As SOCS molecules are known inhibitors of signal transduction and transcription factor phosphorylation, which is essential for interferon-gamma-induced intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and HLA-DR upregulation, this may explain the interferon-gamma unresponsiveness after ultraviolet B radiation.