Search

PURPOSE: To examine the association between race and clinical outcomes (pathological complete response [pCR]; recurrence free survival [RFS], and overall survival [OS]) in patients diagnosed with triple-negative (TNBC) or HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: Patients who self-identified as non-Hispanic white (NHW) or non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and were diagnosed with Stage I-III TNBC (n=171 including 124 NHW and 47 NHB) and HER2-positive (n=161 including 136 NHW and 25 NHB) breast cancer who received NAC from 2000–2018 at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center were included. Associations of race with pCR and survival outcomes were evaluated using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in pCR between NHB and NHW patients with TNBC (31.9 vs 29.8%; OR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.54–2.29) or HER2-positive breast cancer (36.0 vs 39.7%; OR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.36–3.11). After controlling for potential confounders, including age, stage, treatment regimens, insurance status, and comorbidities, no statistically significant difference in OS or RFS was observed between NHB and NHW patients within either subtype. CONCLUSION: TNBC or HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated at a single academic center in Buffalo, NY, showed similar outcomes independent of patients’ race. Given the known genetic diversity of African American ancestry in the US, further studies investigating the interplay between race, geography and clinical outcomes are warranted.

Background: The PROMIS trial (NCT01617954) previously evaluated how a definitive result from the MammaPrint 70-gene signature (70-GS) can impact treatment recommendations for patients with an intermediate range recurrence score (RS 18-30) from the 21-gene assay (21-GA, Oncotype DX). Since publication of this study, TAILORx results published in 2018 (and further explored in June 2019) suggested an interaction between the 21-GA, patient age (≤50 yrs), and clinical risk. Initially, chemotherapy (CT) was recommended for all women ≤50 with a RS>16. Based on the recent clinical-risk analysis, Ovarian Function Suppression (OFS) + endocrine therapy (ET) has been suggested as an alternative treatment for low clinical risk (clin-low) women ≤50yrs with an RS 16-25. This current analysis examines the updated treatment recommendations based on the interaction between patient age and clinical risk, and explores the impact that the 70-GS can have on adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for women ≤50 years of age. Methods: 70-GS risk of recurrence was determined for 21-GA intermediate patients by standard diagnostic testing (Agendia, Irvine, CA). Clinical risk was assessed using the MINDACT, modified Adjuvant Online! algorithm (Cardoso, NEJM 2016). The 70-GS High and Low Risk classification were subdivided by RS groups 18-20, 21-25, and 26-30 and by clinical risk stratification. Results: 181 patients in PROMIS were ≤50 yrs. Of those, 64% (116/181) were clin-low, and 35% (63/181) were high clinical risk (clin-high) (2 unknown). Among patients ≤50 yrs with RS 18-20, 60% (27/45) of clin-low and 56% (15/27) of clin-high were found to be 70-GS Low Risk. Among patients with RS 21-25, 55% (30/55) of clin-low and 30% clin-high (8/26) were Low Risk by the 70-GS. For patients ≤50 yrs with RS 26-30, 15% (4/27) were found to be 70-GS Low Risk. Of all patients with RS 26-30, 21% (32/156) were Low Risk by 70-GS. Conclusions: With the follow-up publication for TAILORx, incorporation of clinical risk in addition to age, RS group, and the assumed benefit of chemotherapy-induced menopause, has presented additional layers of complexity for physicians treating breast cancer. The current analysis demonstrates that 46% of women ≤ 50yrs with a RS 21-25 are 70-GS Low Risk, and based upon the prospective, randomized MINDACT* trial data, can safely avoid CT. Overall, the 70-GS can precisely identify 20-60% of women ≤ 50yrs with intermediate RS (18-30) as genomic Low Risk with excellent survival with ET alone (>95% 5-yr DMFI [MINDACT]), who may otherwise be candidates for treatment with CT or OFS. *(Microarray in Node Negative and 1-3 Lymph Node Positive Disease May Avoid Chemotherapy) AgeRS GroupClinical RiskNMP Low Risk% recommended ET alone based on 70 -GStreatment recommendation based on 21-GA≤ 50RS 18-20Clin-low452760%OFS+ET or ET aloneClin-high / (unknown)26 (1)1556%CT+ET or OFS+ETTotal724258% ≤ 50RS 21-25Clin-low553055%OFS+ETClin-high / (unknown)26 (1)830%CT+ET or OFS+ETTotal823846% ≤ 50RS 26-30Clin-low1616%All receive CT+ET regardless of clinical riskClin-high11327%Total27415% Citation Format: Michaela Tsai, Hatem Soliman, Shelly Lo, Rubina Qamar, Raye Budway, Ellis Levine, Pat Whitworth, Blanche Mavromatis, Robin Zon, Sarah Untch, Lisa Blumencranz, Joseph McKelley, William Audeh, PROMIS Investigators Group. Treatment recommendations in ER+ patients ≤ 50 years: Comparison of the 21-gene assay and 70-gene signature in the PROMIS study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-11.

PURPOSE Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical problem that may be overcome with the use of histone deacetylase inhibitors such as entinostat. The ENCORE301 phase II study reported improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of entinostat to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane in advanced hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS E2112 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that enrolled men or women with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease progressed after nonsteroidal AI. Participants were randomly assigned to exemestane 25 mg by mouth once daily and entinostat (EE) or placebo (EP) 5 mg by mouth once weekly. Primary end points were PFS by central review and OS. Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate, and lysine acetylation change in peripheral blood mononuclear cells between baseline and cycle 1 day 15. RESULTS Six hundred eight patients were randomly assigned during March 2014-October 2018. Median age was 63 years (range 29-91), 60% had visceral disease, and 84% had progressed after nonsteroidal AI in metastatic setting. Previous treatments included chemotherapy (60%), fulvestrant (30%), and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (35%). Most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events in the EE arm included neutropenia (20%), hypophosphatemia (14%), anemia (8%), leukopenia (6%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Median PFS was 3.3 months (EE) versus 3.1 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.13; P = .30). Median OS was 23.4 months (EE) versus 21.7 months (EP; hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.21; P = .94). Objective response rate was 5.8% (EE) and 5.6% (EP). Pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed target inhibition in entinostat-treated patients. CONCLUSION The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not improve survival in AI-resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for a disproportionate amount of poor outcomes among breast cancers. A subset of TNBCs demonstrates an aggressive course with marked chemoresistance, rapid distant metastatic spread, and poor survival. The clinicopathologic and sociodemographic features associated with rapid relapse among TNBCs remain poorly understood. Primary Objective: To evaluate the relationship between clinicopathologic and sociodemographic features with rapid relapse in TNBC (rrTNBC). Methods: This large multi-institutional study analyzed a cohort of breast cancer patients diagnosed with TNBC who received treatment at one of ten academic centers that previously participated in a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) outcomes database between 1998 and 2012. We defined rrTNBC as a distant metastatic recurrence event or death from any cause ≤24 months after diagnosis. We included patients with ≥2 years follow-up or had suffered a survival event within that timeframe. We excluded patients with de novo metastatic disease and those who did not receive chemotherapy. We randomly divided the total dataset into 70% training and 30% validation cohorts, balanced by the number of rrTNBC events. Covariates included study site, age at diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), race/ethnicity, education, median annual household income (2000 census tract), insurance type (Managed Care, Medicare, Medicaid, and Other), Charlson comorbidity index, tumor stage and grade at diagnosis, and adjuvant radiation treatment. Logistic regression was performed among the training dataset univariately for associations with rapid relapse vs. not. Features with a p-value Results: Among 41,839 patients with invasive breast cancer treated in these ten centers, 5256 had TNBC (12.6%), among whom 3016 had adequate follow-up to be included in the analysis. Bivariable analyses in the training cohort (n=2112) identified tumor stage at diagnosis, insurance type, age at diagnosis, BMI, race, and income to be associated with rrTNBC events (p15x increased risk of rapid relapse (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 16.5 [10.3, 26.4]; p Conclusion: Advanced tumor stage at diagnosis was the most influential predictor of rapid relapse among patients who had TNBC, while type of insurance remains an independent predictor in training and validation cohorts. Given the known association of sociodemographic disparities with tumor stage, further study of underlying causes and potential interventions to reduce rapid relapse of TNBC is warranted. Citation Format: Sarah Asad, Carlos H. Barcenas, Richard J. Bleicher, Adam L. Cohen, Sara H. Javid, Ellis G. Levine, Nancy U. Lin, Beverly Moy, Joyce Niland, Antonio C. Wolff, Michael J. Hassett, Daniel G. Stover. Factors associated with rapid relapse in triple negative breast cancer: A multi-institution study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-02.

Background Increased usage of genomic risk assessment assays suggests increased reliance on data provided by these assays to guide therapy decisions. The current study aimed to assess the change in treatment decision and physician confidence based on the 70-gene risk of recurrence signature (70-GS, MammaPrint) and the 80-gene molecular subtype signature (80-GS, BluePrint) in early stage breast cancer patients. Methods IMPACt, a prospective, case-only study, enrolled 452 patients between November 2015 and August 2017. The primary objective population included 358 patients with stage I-II, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. The recommended treatment plan and physician confidence were captured before and after receiving results for 70-GS and 80-GS. Treatment was started after obtaining results. The distribution of 70-GS High Risk (HR) and Low Risk (LR) patients was evaluated, in addition to the distribution of 80-GS compared to IHC status. Results The 70-GS classified 62.5% (n = 224/358) of patients as LR and 37.5% (n = 134/358) as HR. Treatment decisions were changed for 24.0% (n = 86/358) of patients after receiving 70-GS and 80-GS results. Of the LR patients initially prescribed CT, 71.0% (44/62) had CT removed from their treatment recommendation. Of the HR patients not initially prescribed CT, 65.1% (41/63) had CT added. After receiving 70-GS results, CT was included in 83.6% (n = 112/134) of 70-GS HR patient treatment plans, and 91.5% (n = 205/224) of 70-GS LR patient treatment plans did not include CT. For patients who disagreed with the treatment recommended by their physicians, most (94.1%, n = 16/17) elected not to receive CT when it was recommended. For patients whose physician-recommended treatment plan was discordant with 70-GS results, discordance was significantly associated with age and lymph node status. Conclusions The IMPACt trial showed that treatment plans were 88.5% (n = 317/358) in agreement with 70-GS results, indicating that physicians make treatment decisions in clinical practice based on the 70-GS result. In clinically high risk, 70-GS Low Risk patients, there was a 60.0% reduction in treatment recommendations that include CT. Additionally, physicians reported having greater confidence in treatment decisions for their patients in 72% (n = 258/358) of cases after receiving 70-GS results. Trial registration “Measuring the Impact of MammaPrint on Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Registry” (NCT02670577) retrospectively registered on Jan 27, 2016.

Testicular cancer is relatively uncommon and accounts for 50% of patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Testicular Cancer focuses on recommendations for the management of adult patients with nonseminomatous GCTs.

Progress made in early cancer diagnosis and therapy has translated into increased longevity for patients with breast cancer. As survival has increased, the potential cardiotoxicity of cancer chemotherapy regimens has become an important issue for survivorship. Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity has been demonstrated at a cumulative dose of ≤ 300mg/m2, with histopathological changes seen in endomyocardial biopsy tissue from patients receiving as little as 240mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Individual risk stratification and early detection of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity are crucial to prevent irreversible cardiac dysfunction. There is accumulating evidence for the utility of echocardiographic indices such as left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) in the detection of early chemotherapy induced cardiac injury. We have previously highlighted a predictive role of genetic polymorphisms in the carbonyl reductase 3 gene CBR3 in anthracycline-related cardiomyopathy following childhood cancer. Consistent with our prior work, we hypothesized that breast cancer patients homozygous for the CBR3 V244M G allele would exhibit worsening GLS following DOX treatment when compared with patients homozygous for the A allele. We recruited 138 patients with breast cancer receiving treatment with DOX (total cumulative dose: 240mg/m2). 72 patients received an echocardiogram analyzing global longitudinal strain by speckle tracking at baseline (t0 month) and at 6 months (t6 months) of follow up after DOX treatment. Patients were genotyped for variants associated with anthracycline-related toxicity. In agreement with our previous findings and hypothesis, our interim analysis suggested that patients homozygous for the CBR3 V244M G allele (CBR V244) exhibited GL changes at 6 months after DOX therapy suggestive of cardiotoxicity in comparison to individuals homozygous for the A allele (CBR3 M244) (-1.2 ±3.5 vs 1±1.6; mean±SEM, p=0.8 by Mann-Whitney test). Although the differences between CBR3 genotype groups are not significant at p Citation Format: Lang JK, Quinones AL, Hageman Blair R, Early AP, Levine EG, Opyrchal M, Blanco JG, O'Connor T. Association of CBR3 polymorphisms with an early change in cardiac function as assessed by left ventricular global longitudinal strain in breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-08.

Background:Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for disproportionately poor outcomes in breast cancer, driven by a subset of rapid-relapse TNBC (rrTNBC) with marked chemoresistance, rapid metastatic spread, and poor survival. Our objective was to evaluate clinicopathologic and sociodemographic features associated with rrTNBC.Methods:We included patients diagnosed with stage I–III TNBC in 1996 through 2012 who received chemotherapy at 1 of 10 academic cancer centers. rrTNBC was defined as a distant metastatic recurrence event or death ≤24 months after diagnosis. Features associated with rrTNBC were included in a multivariable logistic model upon which backward elimination was performed with aPResults:Among all patients with breast cancer treated at these centers, 3,016 fit the inclusion criteria. Training cohort (n=2,112) bivariable analyses identified disease stage, insurance type, age, body mass index, race, and income as being associated with rrTNBC (PP24 months), we found that insurance type and young age remained significant.Conclusions:Timing of relapse in TNBC is associated with stage of disease and distinct sociodemographic features, including insurance type, income, and age at diagnosis.

Background Brain metastases develop in up to 50% patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ BC and are an increasing source of morbidity and mortality. HER3, overexpressed in triple negative and HER2+ brain metastatic breast cancer (BMBC), is a resistance factor to HER2-targeted therapies and a driver of CNS metastasis. Disease progression is associated with loss of anti-HER2/3 immunity. We have demonstrated that alphaDC1 loaded with glioma-specific peptides induce intratumoral production of chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CCL5) which attract CXCR3- and CCR5- expressing cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) and T-helper 1 (Th1) cells to brain tumors, inducing clinical responses and long-term disease stabilization in patients with aggressive recurrent primary brain tumors. Our preclinical data show that Chemokine modulating (CKM) regimen [rintatolimod, interferon (IFN)-α2b and COX-2 inhibitor] also selectively attracts effector CTLs and Th1 cells (but not suppressive regulatory T-cells or myeloid-derived suppressor cells) into tumors. Importantly, CKM preferentially promotes CTL migration into tumor rather than healthy tissues, providing rationale for its systemic use. We hypothesize that anti-HER2/3 type 1 polarized DC1s in combination with CKM and anti-PD1 will result in improved Th1/CTL response against HER2/3 epitopes, reduce brain recurrence and systemic progression. Methods This is a phase II single-arm, non-randomized multicenter study (NCT04348747). Eligibility includes patients with triple negative and HER2+ BMBC ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS ≤ 1, normal marrow and organ function with asymptomatic untreated brain metastases who receive αDC1 q2 weeks x 3, with CKM [200 mg IV rintatolimod, IFN-α 20 million units/m2 IV, celecoxib 200 mg oral BID] on days 1-3 with second and third dose of αDC1, followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg IV. Thereafter, pembrolizumab is given every 3 weeks, along with αDC1 and CKM every 3 months as booster dose until disease progression, intolerable side effects or withdrawal from study, or up to 24 months. Baseline and 3-week post-CKM treatment peripheral (non-CNS) biopsies are required for six patients. Primary objective is CNS response rate (RR) using RANO-BM criteria. If no CNS response is observed after 12 patients, study will be terminated. If ≥ 1 response observed, then 9 more patients will be enrolled, for a total of 21 patients. If ≥ 3 CR observed, the proposed therapy will be considered promising for further study. Secondary objectives include non-CNS RR per RECIST v1.1, median CNS, non-CNS and overall progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Analysis of change in intratumoral biomarkers is an exploratory objective. Results N/A Conclusions N/A Trial Registration NCT04348747 Ethics Approval The study was approved by Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Institution’s Ethics Board, approval number I-19-04120.

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with taxanes is the standard of care in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Intratumoral prevalence of CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) is associated with an improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), while regulatory T-cells (Treg) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are associated with poor survival. Higher ratio of CTL/Treg is associated with higher probability of obtaining pathological complete response (pCR), a surrogate marker for RFS. Intratumoral production of CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 is critical for local infiltration with CTLs, while CCL22 is responsible for Treg attraction. Previous studies have shown that CXCL9 expression in the pre-treatment breast tissue is associated with a three-fold higher rate of achieving pCR. Our preclinical data show that Chemokine modulating (CKM) regimen, combining rintatolimod (TLR3 agonist), interferon (IFN)-α2b, and celecoxib (COX-2 inhibitor) increases CTL-attracting, and decreases MDSC-, Treg-favoring chemokines, increasing CTL/Treg ratio in tumor microenvironment, with preferential tumor tissue activation than adjacent healthy tissues. We hypothesize that the combination of CKM with paclitaxel will result in infiltration of TNBC with CTLs, and along with doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), result in higher pCR, translating into improved RFS and OS. Methods In this phase I study NCT04081389, eligibility includes age ≥18 years, confirmed resectable TNBC, radiographically measurable disease ≥1 cm, ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate organ and marrow function. Patients with autoimmune disease, serious mood disorders, invasive carcinoma within 3 years, history of peptic ulcers or hypersensitivity to NSAIDs will be excluded. We plan to treat three patients with early stage TNBC with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly for 12 weeks, rintatolimod 200 mg IV, celecoxib 200 mg oral twice daily, and accelerated titration of IFN-α2b at doses 0, 5, or 10 million units (MU)/m2 [Dose Levels (DL) 1, 2 and 3 respectively] on days 1–3 (no intra-patient dose escalation) in weeks 1–3. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as grade 3 or higher toxicities within the first 3 weeks. Any DLT will mandate recruitment per the 3+3 model. If no DLT, three patients will be enrolled at DL 4 at 20 MU/m2 IFN- α2b. This will be followed by standard dose-dense AC, and then surgery. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability of combination and to identify the appropriate DL of CKM and paclitaxel for extended efficacy study. The secondary endpoints include investigation of efficacy (pCR and breast MRI response), along with RFS and OS. Intratumoral biomarkers will be analyzed in an exploratory manner. Results N/A Conclusions N/A Trial Registration NCT04081389 Ethics Approval The study was approved by Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center Institution’s Ethics Board, approval number I-73718.

Background:Despite the approval of mTOR inhibitor everolimus and CDK4/6 inhibitors in the management of hormone-receptor-positive HER2 non-amplified metastatic breast cancer (HR+ HER2-MBC), the optimal sequence of therapy is unclear. There are no clinical data on efficacy of everolimus in HR+ HER2-MBC after cancer progresses on CDK4/6 inhibitors.Objective:The objective of this study is to find the efficacy of everolimus in HR+ HER2-MBC after they progress on a CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib.Methods:This is a retrospective, 2-institute review of HR+ HER2-MBC from Jan 2015 to March 2018 treated with everolimus after progression on palbociclib. Primary end point was median progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end points objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit ratio (CBR), and overall survival (OS).Results:Out of 41 women with median age 61 years (33, 87) enrolled, 66% had received adjuvant systemic therapy, 61% had visceral disease, and 95% had prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. About 83% women had 3 or more chemotherapy or hormonal therapies prior to everolimus. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a median PFS of 4.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-6.2). The median OS was 18.7 months (95% CI 9.5 to not reached). Objective response rate and CBR were both 17.1%.Conclusion:Everolimus was associated with modest PFS and ORR in HR+ HER2-MBCs postprogression on palbociclib.

Purpose Outcome data on hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) nonamplified (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with palbociclib after treatment with everolimus are lacking. The PALOMA-3 trial, showing benefit of palbociclib plus fulvestrant compared to fulvestrant alone in HR+HER2− MBC after progression while receiving endocrine therapy excluded women previously treated with everolimus. The objective of this study was to examine outcomes of HR+HER2− MBC with prior exposure to everolimus while receiving palbociclib-based therapy. Patients and Methods A retrospective, single-institute review was conducted of HR+HER2− MBC from January 2014 to November 2016 in patients treated with palbociclib after prior treatment with everolimus. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from initiation of palbociclib to the date of progression as determined by the treating physician based on radiologic, biochemical, and/or clinical criteria. Response rates were determined on the basis of available radiologic data. Objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the rate of any complete or partial responses; clinical benefit rate (CBR) was the rate of complete response, partial response, or stable disease for at least 24 weeks. Results Twenty-three patients with a mean (range) age of 68 (42-81) years were identified. Kaplan-Meier estimate showed median PFS of 2.9 months (95% confidence interval, 2.1-4.2); ORR was 0 of 23 and CBR was 4 (17.4%) of 23. In the PALOMA-3 trial, median PFS, ORR, and CBR of palbociclib cohort were 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 9.2-11.0), 19%, and 67%, respectively. Conclusion There is a limited clinical activity of palbociclib combinations after progression with everolimus combination therapy. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Background: IMPACt is a prospective, case-only study to measure the effect of MammaPrint (MP) and BluePrint (BP) on treatment decisions in breast cancer patients. Here, we report the results of the primary objective in women aged ≥18 years with histologically proven invasive stage I-II, hormone receptor (HR) positive, and HER2-negative breast cancer. Methods: The study included 369 women from 18 US institutions. The recommended treatment plan was captured before and after receiving results for MP and BP. Treatment was started after obtaining results. In addition to the effect of results on physician treatment decisions involving chemotherapy (CT) and physician confidence, the distribution of MP High Risk (HR) and Low Risk (LR) patients was also evaluated. Results: MP classified patients to 62% (n=228) LR and 38% (n=141) HR. Treatment decisions were changed for 25% (n=92) of women after receiving MP and BP results. Of the LR patients initially prescribed CT, 68% (45/66) had CT removed from their treatment recommendation. Of the HR patients who initially were not prescribed CT, 66% (42/64) had CT added. Overall, 89% (202/228) of LR patients did not receive CT, and likewise 84% (119/141) of HR patients did receive CT after receiving MP. Among those who did not change treatment (n=277), 68% of physicians reported having greater confidence in their prescribed therapy. Conclusions: The IMPACt trial shows MP generates a 25% overall treatment change in clinical practice. The highest impact is for women with LR results, where 68% are spared chemotherapy in favor of endocrine therapy alone. Additionally, 73% of physicians report having higher confidence in treatment decisions for their patient after MP. Table 1: Treatment changesTreatment Decision Pre- to Post-MPMP HRMP LRTotalCT to CT772198no CT tp CT42547CT to no CT04545no CT to no CT22157179Total141228369 Citation Format: Soliman H, Rehmus E, Shah V, Srkalovic G, Mahtani R, Levine E, Mavromatis B, Srinivasiah J, Kassar M, Gabordi R, Yoder E, Qamar R, Audeh W, IMPACt Investigators Group I. IMPACt trial: MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular subtyping guide treatment decisions in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-13-04.

Background: Endocrine therapy resistance in advanced breast cancer remains a significant clinical problem that may be overcome with use of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors such as entinostat. The ENCORE 301 randomized phase II study reported an improvement in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the addition of entinostat to the steroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) exemestane in patients with advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Protein lysine acetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was associated with prolonged PFS in the entinostat arm. Methods: E2112 is a multicenter randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study that enrolled men or women with advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer whose disease had progressed on a non-steroidal AI in the adjuvant or metastatic setting (NCT02115282). Study participants were also required to have an ECOG performance status 0-1 with measurable or non-measurable (limited to 20% of the study population) disease. One prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease and prior treatment with fulvestrant and a CDK4/6 inhibitor was permitted but not required. Participants received exemestane 25mg po daily and entinostat (EE)/placebo (EP) 5mg po every week. Primary endpoints were PFS (central review) and OS. One-sided type 1 error 0.025 was split between two hypothesis tests: 0.001 for PFS test and 0.024 for OS. PFS tested in the first 360 pts, 88.5% power to detect 42% reduction in the hazard of PFS failure (median PFS, 4.1 to 7.1 months); OS tested in all 600 pts, 80% power to detect 25% reduction in the hazard of death (median OS, 22 to 29.3 months). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR), and changes in protein lysine acetylation status in PBMCs (CD3+ T cells, CD14+ monocytes, CD19+ B cells, pan-leukocyte marker CD45+ cells, CD56+ NK cells) between C1D1 and C1D15 (integrated biomarker). Results: A total of 608 participants were randomized between March 2014 and October 2018 (305 EE, 303 EP), 98% enrolled in USA. Characteristics were well balanced between the arms. Median age was 63 years (range, 29-91), 99% female, 95% postmenopausal, 80% white and 15% black. A majority (84%) had disease resistant to AI in the metastatic setting at study entry, 78% had measurable disease and 60% visceral disease. Prior treatments included chemotherapy (60%), fulvestrant (30%), CDK4/6 inhibitor (35%), everolimus (3%). Median prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range, 0-4) and endocrine therapy was 2 (range, 1-7); in adjuvant/metastatic setting. Grade 3/4 adverse events in EE arm included neutrophil count decreased (20%), hypophosphatemia (14%), anemia (8%), white blood cell decreased (6%), fatigue (4%), diarrhea (4%), and platelet count decreased (3%). At final analysis, median PFS was 3.3 months (EE) versus 3.1 months (EP) (HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.13, p=0.30). Median OS was 23.4 months (EE) versus 21.7 months (EP) (HR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.21, p=0.94). ORR was 4.6% (EE) and 4.3% (EP). The median fold change in lysine acetylation in PBMCs was approximately 1.5 in EE arm, and 1 in EP arm. Participants on EE had significantly higher increase in lysine acetylation by C1D15 than patients on EP (397 paired samples available for analysis, p Conclusion: The combination of exemestane and entinostat did not improve survival in AI resistant advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed target inhibition in entinostat-treated patients. Citation Format: Roisin M Connolly, Fengmin Zhao, Kathy D Miller, Min-Jung Lee, Richard L Piekarz, Karen L Smith, Ursa Brown-Glaberman, Jennifer S Winn, Bryan A Faller, Adedayo A Onitilo, Mark E Burkard, George T Budd, Ellis G Levine, Melanie E Royce, Peter A Kaufman, Alexandra Thomas, Jane B Trepel, Antonio C Wolff, Joseph A Sparano. E2112: Randomized phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy plus entinostat/placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-02.

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight the recent updates/changes in these guidelines, and updates include axitinib as first-line treatment option for patients with clear cell renal carcinoma, new data to support pazopanib as subsequent therapy for patients with clear cell carcinoma after first-line treatment with another tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and guidelines for follow-up of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression is associated with poor outcomes in urothelial carcinoma (UC). Cetuximab (CTX) exhibited an antitumor effect in in vivo UC models. The efficacy of gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) with or without CTX in patients with advanced UC was evaluated. METHODS Patients with advanced UC, measurable disease, and adequate organ function were randomized 1:2 to cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 1 plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm A) or GC plus CTX (500 mg/m2) on days 1 and 15 (arm B). The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The secondary endpoints were the response duration, safety, progression-free survival, overall survival, determination of whether or not CTX sensitized nonresponders to GC, and exploratory biomarker analysis. The accrual targets were 27 and 54 patients for the 2 arms, respectively. The overall response rate was reported by arm with binomial confidence intervals (CIs). Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event endpoints. RESULTS Eighty-eight eligible patients were randomized; 87 were toxicity-evaluable, and 85 were response-evaluable. The overall response rates were 57.1% for arm A (95% CI = 37%-76%) and 61.4% for arm B (95% CI = 48%-74%). The median progression-free survival times were 8.5 months for arm A (95% CI = 5.7-10.4 months) and 7.6 months for arm B (95% CI = 6.1-8.7 months). The median overall survival times were 17.4 months for arm A (95% CI = 12.8 months to unreached) and 14.3 months for arm B (95% CI = 11.6-22.2 months). The most common grade 3/grade 4 adverse events in both arms were myelosuppression and nausea. Thromboembolism, acneiform rash, fatigue, pain, hypersensitivity reactions, elevated transaminases, hyponatremia, and hypomagnesemia were more common in arm B; 3 grade 5 adverse events occurred in arm B. The presence of primary disease significantly correlated with thromboembolism. An increased soluble E-cadherin level after cycle 2 correlated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS GC plus CTX was feasible but was associated with more adverse events and no improvements in outcomes. Cancer 2014;120:2684–2693. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight treatment recommendations and updates specific to the management of patients with advanced non-clear cell carcinoma included in the 2014 version of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology for Kidney Cancer.

Purpose: We assessed adding the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib to gemcitabine or capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer whose disease progressed during/after bevacizumab. Experimental Design: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIb study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00493636) enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer and prior bevacizumab treatment. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy with sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily) or matching placebo. Initially, chemotherapy was gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 i.v., days 1, 8/21), but later, capecitabine (1,000 mg/m2 orally twice daily, days 1–14/21) was allowed as an alternative. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: One hundred and sixty patients were randomized. More patients received gemcitabine (82.5%) than capecitabine (17.5%). Sorafenib plus gemcitabine/capecitabine was associated with a statistically significant prolongation in PFS versus placebo plus gemcitabine/capecitabine [3.4 vs. 2.7 months; HR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.95; P = 0.02], time to progression was increased (median, 3.6 vs. 2.7 months; HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44–0.93; P = 0.02), and overall response rate was 19.8% versus 12.7% (P = 0.23). Median survival was 13.4 versus 11.4 months for sorafenib versus placebo (HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.71−1.44; P = 0.95). Addition of sorafenib versus placebo increased grade 3/4 hand–foot skin reaction (39% vs. 5%), stomatitis (10% vs. 0%), fatigue (18% vs. 9%), and dose reductions that were more frequent (51.9% vs. 7.8%). Conclusion: The addition of sorafenib to gemcitabine/capecitabine provided a clinically small but statistically significant PFS benefit in HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients whose disease progressed during/after bevacizumab. Combination treatment was associated with manageable toxicities but frequently required dose reductions. Clin Cancer Res; 19(10); 2745–54. ©2013 AACR.

The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enhances the effect of the selective estrogen receptor (ER) downregulator (SERD) fulvestrant by causing accumulation of cytoplasmic ER aggregates in preclinical models. The purpose of this trial was to determine whether bortezomib enhanced the effectiveness of fulvestrant. One hundred eighteen postmenopausal women with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were randomized to fulvestrant alone (Arm A—500 mg intramuscular (i.m.) day −14, 1, 15 in cycle 1, and day 1 of additional cycles) or in combination with bortezomib (Arm B—1.6 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) on days 1, 8, 15 of each cycle). The study was powered to show an improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) from 5.4 to 9.0 months and compare PFS rates at 6 and 12 months (α=0.10, β=0.10). Patients with progression on fulvestrant could cross over to the combination (arm C). Although there was no difference in median PFS (2.7 months in both arms), the hazard ratio for PFS in Arm B versus Arm A (referent) was 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.49, 1.09, P=0.06, 1-sided log-rank test, significant at the prespecified 1-sided 0.10 α level). At 12 months, the PFS proportion in Arm A and Arm B was 13.6% and 28.1% (P=0.03, 1-sided χ2-test; 95% CI for difference (14.5%)=−0.06, 29.1%). Of 27 patients on arm A who crossed over to the combination (arm C), 5 (18%) were progression-free for at least 24 weeks. Bortezomib likely enhances the effectiveness of fulvestrant in AI-resistant, ER-positive metastatic breast cancer by reducing acquired resistance, supporting additional evaluation of proteasome inhibitors in combination with SERDs. A proteasome inhibitor likely enhances the effectiveness of the breast cancer drug fulvestrant, according to a small, randomized trial. Kerin Adelson, formerly of Mount Sinai and currently of Yale University School of Medicine, led this New York Cancer Consortium, National Cancer Institute-funded randomized phase II trial testing fulvestrant (an estrogen receptor degrader) with or without the addition of bortezomib (a drug that blocks the cellular complexes that break down proteins) in 118 postmenopausal women with a form of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer that is often treated with fulvestrant. Although the median time before tumors started to grow was similar between the two treatment arms of the study, a significantly larger fraction of patients who received bortezomib were living without tumor growth at 12 months compared to those who received fulvestrant alone. The addition of bortezomib may help delay or reverse resistance to fulvestrant.

Chemoimmunotherapy in follicular lymphoma is associated with significant toxicity. Targeted therapies are being investigated as potentially more efficacious and tolerable alternatives for this multiply-relapsing disease. Based on promising activity with rituximab and lenalidomide in previously untreated follicular lymphoma (overall response rate [ORR] 90%-96%) and ibrutinib in relapsed disease (ORR 30%-55%), the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology conducted a phase 1 trial of rituximab, lenalidomide, and ibrutinib. Previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma received rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 4, 6, 8, and 10; lenalidomide as per cohort dose on days 1 to 21 of 28 for 18 cycles; and ibrutinib as per cohort dose daily until progression. Dose escalation used a 3+3 design from a starting dose level (DL) of lenalidomide 15 mg and ibrutinib 420 mg (DL0) to DL2 (lenalidomide 20 mg, ibrutinib 560 mg). Twenty-two patients were enrolled; DL2 was determined to be the recommended phase II dose. Although no protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicities were reported, a high incidence of rash was observed (all grades 82%, grade 3 36%). Eleven patients (50%) required dose reduction, 7 because of rash. The ORR for the entire cohort was 95%, and the 12-month progression-free survival was 80% (95% confidence interval, 57%-92%). Five patients developed new malignancies; 3 had known risk factors before enrollment. Given the increased toxicity and required dose modifications, as well as the apparent lack of additional clinical benefit to the rituximab-lenalidomide doublet, further investigation of the regimen in this setting seems unwarranted. The study was registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT01829568.

Background: As mammography is not generally recommended to women under 40, it is reasonable to conclude that documented outcome improvements over time are attributable to treatment advances with screening playing a less important role. In order to determine the contribution of screening and treatment to improvements, we evaluated the odds of presenting with more advanced disease by time-period and examined the time-trends in outcome in a population-based cohort ≤50. We evaluated whether any outcomes differentials existed by ER status. Methods: Patients in SEER diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) were divided into 4 by year of diagnosis (1990–1994, 1995–1999, 2000–2004, 2005–2008). Patients were also categorized into 2 age-groups: Results: 110,629 patient records were included. Multivariate adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in women aged 40–50 with ER positive BC declined over time. Comparing all time periods to 1990–1994, the HR for mortality in 1995–1999 was 0.83 (0.77–0.89), 0.61 (0.57–0.65) in 2000–2004, and 0.35 (0.30–0.40) in 2005–2008 (p A 1.3-fold increase in the odds of presenting with stage I BC was seen in women 40–50 years comparing the 3 latter time periods with 1990–1994. Similarly, in the same age group, there was a 2.12-fold likelihood of presenting with a tumor ≤1cm in 2005–2008 versus 1990–1994. In women Conclusions: Patients who are ER positive and between 40–50 years have had time-trend changes with improvements in breast cancer outcome and smaller tumors likely attributable to both screening and hormonal therapies. Patients who are Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-02.

Background: Recent studies suggest that older women derive the same benefits from adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (AST) as younger women. In older women, the ability to successfully complete chemotherapy may be complicated by other health conditions and performance status. This study examines the frequency of inability to complete planned AST and factors associated with difficulty administering AST in older women. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients (age≥65) who received adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Roswell Park Cancer Institute from 9/1997 to 1/2010. Endpoints considered collectively as “difficulty “ in delivering AST were delay in treatment, hospitalization, dose reduction and discontinuation of AST. Factors defined a priori that could affect these outcomes were creatinine clearance (CCr), obesity (BMI ≥30), cardiac disease, hypertension, psychiatric disorders, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, previous malignancy, COPD/asthma, Charlson comorbidity index, and use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The Pearson chi-squared test was used to identify the significant categorical factors associated with each of the five binary responses indicating difficulty administering AST. Logistic regression was used to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratios to further examine the relationships. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival distributions, progression free and overall survival. The log-rank test was used for comparison between women experiencing difficulty with treatment and those with no difficulty with treatment. A 0.05 nominal significance level was used in all testing. Statistical analysis and plots were completed using SAS, version 9.2, statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results: 193 women age 65 and over received AST (median age of 70 years - range 65-86). Median follow up was 40.9 months. 73% received anthracycline-based AST. Factors associated with difficulty, delay, dose reduction, hospitalization, or failure to complete planned AST are shown in the Table. Women who completed planned AST had better OS than those who did not complete AST (p=0.01). Women who completed therapy with difficulty had no difference in outcome compared to those without difficulty [DFS (p=0.07) and OS (p=0.18)]. Conclusions: Age, cardiac disease, diabetes, hypertension, CCr, obesity, CCI, and sum of comorbidity significantly impact the ability to deliver and complete AST in older women with BC. Completing planned chemotherapy is associated with improved survival. Figures available in online version. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-08.

BACKGROUND Mitoxantrone in combination with a low-dose glucocorticoid has been shown to produce more favorable outcomes among men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma than glucocorticoid alone. Therefore, the authors sought to determine the safety and activity of higher doses of mitoxantrone in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and a glucocorticoid in preparation for a possible Phase III trial comparing standard to dose-escalated mitoxantrone. METHODS This Phase II trial enrolled 45 patients from October 1996 to March 1998. Twenty-one patients without pelvic irradiation (Arm I) received 21 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone every 3 weeks, and 24 patients who had received pelvic irradiation (Arm II) were given 17 mg/m2 on the same schedule. All patients received 40 mg of hydrocortisone in divided doses daily and GM-CSF at 500 μg/daily for a minimum of 10 days per cycle beginning on the third day of the cycle. RESULTS In Arm I, 33% of assessable patients achieved a partial response, 50% had a ≥ 50% decline in their PSA, and 35% had a ≥ 75% decline in PSA values. The comparable numbers in Arm II were 24%, 48%, and 35%, respectively. The median survival times were 12 months in Arm I and 14 months in Arm II. Treatment had to be discontinued in 13% of patients because of thrombocytopenia. No other significant toxicities were encountered. CONCLUSIONS Higher doses of mitoxantrone (17 and 21 mg/m2) were associated with activity comparable to many estramustine combinations and generally were well tolerated. However, because the degree and frequency of thrombocytopenia were greater than that observed with standard dose mitoxantrone (12–14 mg/m2), and because the median survival is apparently comparable to standard dose mitoxantrone, this approach to HRPC cannot be recommended for Phase III testing. Cancer 2002;94:665–72. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10217

Purpose We evaluated the tolerability and cardiac safety of docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and trastuzumab (TCyH) for the treatment of early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and compared to the standard trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimens doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab (AC-TH) and docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCaH). Methods We retrospectively reviewed early-stage, resectable, HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy at a single comprehensive cancer center between 2004 and 2011. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, relative dose intensity (RDI) of each regimen, tolerability, and cardiac toxicity were evaluated. Results One hundred seventy-seven patients were included in the study (AC-TH, n=114; TCaH, n=39; TCyH, n=24). TCyH was solely administered in the adjuvant setting, whereas two-thirds of the AC-TH and TCaH groups were administered postoperatively. Patients treated with TCyH tended to have a more significant underlying cardiac history, higher Charlson comorbidity index, and were of an earlier stage. All patients treated with TCyH received granulocyte colony stimulating factor primary prophylaxis. No febrile neutropenia or grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity was observed in the TCyH group as compared to the AC-TH and TCaH groups. There were no significant differences in the rates of early termination, hospitalization, dose reduction, or RDI between the regimens. The symptomatic congestive heart failure rate between AC-TH, TCaH, and TCyH groups was not significantly different (4.4% vs. 2.6% vs. 8.3%, respectively, p=0.57). There was also no significant difference in the rate of early trastuzumab termination between patients treated with each regimen. Conclusion TCyH is well tolerated and should be investigated as an alternative adjuvant chemotherapy option for patients who are not candidates for standard trastuzumab-containing regimens. Larger clinical trials are necessary to support the wider use of TCyH as an adjuvant regimen.

Purpose NY-ESO-1 cancer testis (CT) antigen is an attractive candidate for immunotherapy as a result of its high immunogenicity. The aim of this study was to explore the potential for NY-ESO-1 antigen directed immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) by determining the frequency of expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the degree of inherent immunogenicity to NY-ESO-1. Experimental Design 168 TNBC and 47 ER+/HER2- primary breast cancer specimens were used to determine NY-ESO-1 frequency by IHC. As previous studies have shown that patients with a robust innate humoral immune response to CT antigens are more likely to develop CD8 T-cell responses to NY-ESO-1 peptides, we evaluated the degree to which patients with NY-ESO-1 expression had inherent immunogenicity by measuring antibodies. The relationship between NY-ESO-1 expression and CD8+ T lymphocytes was also examined. Results The frequency of NY-ESO-1 expression in the TNBC cohort was 16% versus 2% in ER+/HER2- patients. A higher NY-ESO-1 score was associated with a younger age at diagnosis in the TNBC patients with NY-ESO-1 expression (p = 0.026). No differences in OS (p = 0.278) or PFS (p = 0.238) by NY-ESO-1 expression status were detected. Antibody responses to NY-ESO-1 were found in 73% of TNBC patients whose tumors were NY-ESO-1 positive. NY-ESO-1 positive patients had higher CD8 counts than negative patients (p = 0.018). Conclusion NY-ESO-1 is expressed in a substantial subset of TNBC patients and leads to a high humoral immune response in a large proportion of these individuals. Given these observations, patients with TNBC may benefit from targeted therapies directed against NY-ESO-1.

BACKGROUND: Preclinical data indicate that there is substantial antitumor activity and synergy between calcitriol and dexamethasone. On the basis of these data, the authors conducted a phase 2 trial of intravenous (iv) calcitriol at a dose of 74 μg weekly (based on a recent phase 1 trial) and dexamethasone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: A 2-stage Kepner-Chang design was used. Oral dexamethasone at a dose of 4 mg was given weekly on Days 1 and 2, and iv calcitriol (74 μg over 1 hour) was administered weekly on Day 2 from 4 to 8 hours after the dexamethasone dose in patients with CRPC. Laboratory data were monitored weekly, and renal sonograms, computed tomography scans, and bone scans were obtained every 3 months. Disease response was assessed by using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and standard criteria for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. The calcitriol dose was delineated by from the authors' recent phase 1 trial. RESULTS: Of 18 evaluable patients, 15 patients were Caucasian (83%). No patients had a complete or partial response by either RECIST or PSA response criteria. Fourteen patients had progressive disease, 2 patients refused to continue treatment (after 64 days and 266 days), and 2 patients remain on the trial (for 306 days and 412 days).The median time to disease progression was 106 days (95% confidence interval, 80-182 days). Fourteen episodes of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were noted in 7 patients (hyperglycemia, hypocalemia, chest pain, dyspnea, hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia, cardiac arrhythmia, and pain). Only 1 episode of grade 3/ 4 toxicity was related definitely to calcitriol (hypercalcemia). No treatment-related deaths were noted. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose, iv calcitriol at a dose of 74 μg weekly in combination with dexamethasone was well tolerated but failed to produce a clinical or PSA response in men with CRPC. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Summary Background Tamoxifen is standard adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We assessed the benefit of adding chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen and whether tamoxifen should be given concurrently or after chemotherapy. Methods We undertook a phase 3, parallel, randomised trial (SWOG-8814, INT-0100) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer to test two major objectives: whether the primary outcome, disease-free survival, was longer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) given every 4 weeks for six cycles plus 5 years of daily tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone; and whether disease-free survival was longer with CAF followed by tamoxifen (CAF-T) than with CAF plus concurrent tamoxifen (CAFT). Overall survival and toxicity were predefined, important secondary outcomes for each objective. Patients in this open-label trial were randomly assigned by a computer algorithm in a 2:3:3 ratio (tamoxifen:CAF-T:CAFT) and analysis was by intention to treat of eligible patients. Groups were compared by stratified log-rank tests, followed by Cox regression analyses adjusted for significant prognostic factors. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00929591. Findings Of 1558 randomised women, 1477 (95%) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. After a maximum of 13 years of follow-up (median 8·94 years), 637 women had a disease-free survival event (tamoxifen, 179 events in 361 patients; CAF-T, 216 events in 566 patients; CAFT, 242 events in 550 patients). For the first objective, therapy with the CAF plus tamoxifen groups combined (CAFT or CAF-T) was superior to tamoxifen alone for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (adjusted Cox regression hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·64–0·91; p=0·002) but only marginally for the secondary endpoint of overall survival (HR 0·83, 0·68–1·01; p=0·057). For the second objective, the adjusted HRs favoured CAF-T over CAFT but did not reach significance for disease-free survival (HR 0·84, 0·70–1·01; p=0·061) or overall survival (HR 0·90, 0·73–1·10; p=0·30). Neutropenia, stomatitis, thromboembolism, congestive heart failure, and leukaemia were more frequent in the combined CAF plus tamoxifen groups than in the tamoxifen-alone group. Interpretation Chemotherapy with CAF plus tamoxifen given sequentially is more effective adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer than is tamoxifen alone. However, it might be possible to identify some subgroups that do not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy despite positive nodes. Funding National Cancer Institute (US National Institutes of Health).

Purpose: Increased clearance of drugs, such as oral cyclosporine, that are CYP3A and/or ABCB1 (P-gp/MDR1) substrates was reported in African-American compared with Caucasian patients. We hypothesized that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel, an i.v. administered cytotoxic and substrate for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1, would differ between African-American and Caucasian patients. Experimental Design: We investigated population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the pharmacogenetics of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 in African-American and Caucasian cancer patients who received docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 as a 1-h i.v. infusion. Plasma docetaxel concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Clinical toxicity and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were monitored on days 8, 15, and 22 postadministration of docetaxel. Using a limited sampling strategy and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, each patient's docetaxel clearance was estimated. Genotyping for known polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 was done. Results: We enrolled 109 patients: 40 African-Americans (26 males; 14 females), with a median age of 61 years (range, 29-73), and 69 Caucasians (43 males; 26 females), with a median age of 63 years (range, 38-81). There was no difference in the geometric mean docetaxel clearance between African-American patients [40.3 L/h; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 19.3-84.1] and Caucasian patients (41.8 L/h; 95% CI, 22.0-79.7; P = 0.6). We observed no difference between African-American and Caucasian patients in the percentage decrease in ANC nor were docetaxel pharmacokinetic parameters related to the genotypes studied. Conclusions: Docetaxel clearance and its associated myelosuppression were similar in African-American and Caucasian cancer patients.

Purpose: Fulvestrant (F) is a selective estrogen receptor downregulator (SERD) with activity in aromatase-inhibitor (AI) resistant estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In preclinical studies, the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (B) enhances the antineoplastic effects of F, in part by promoting accumulation of large ER-aggregates that lead to cell death (Ishii et al. Clin Cancer Res 2011 17:2292). The objective of this study was to determine if the combination of F+B was more efficacious than F alone in MBC after AI progression. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER-positive MBC who had progressive disease after prior AI therapy were eligible. They were randomized to F alone (500 mg IM days -15, 1, 15 in cycle 1, and day 1 of each subsequent cycle) or in combination with B (1.6 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, 15). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), measured from cycle 1, day 1 of starting F. A sample size of 118 was pre-specified in order to provide sufficient power to detect an improvement in median PFS from 5.4 to 9.0 months, and compare PFS rates after 6 and 12 months (1-sided alpha=0.10, beta=0.10). Patients with progression on F could cross over to the F+B combination. Results: Of 118 patients enrolled, 59 received F alone (arm A), 57 received F+B (arm B), and 2 assigned to arm B never initiated protocol therapy. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between arms with regard to median age (57 vs. 59 years), ECOG performance status (0 and 1, 64% and 36%, respectively), prior chemotherapy for metastasis (25%), or liver metastases (37%), although patients in arm A had longer median interval between diagnosis and metastasis (49 vs. 28 months) and were more likely to present with metastasis (32% vs. 26%). Patients in arm B had more adverse events (all grades), including nausea (63% vs. 29%), diarrhea (47% vs. 8%), sensory neuropathy (46% vs. 29%), and limb edema (37% vs. 19%), although grade 3-4 events were uncommon, and only 11% discontinued B due to toxicity. At 12 months, the PFS proportion in Arm A and Arm B was 13.6% vs. 28.1%, respectively (P=0.03, 1-sided chi-square test) (95% CI for difference [14.5%] = -0.06%, 29.1%). Although median PFS was similar in the two arms (2.69 vs. 2.73 months, respectively), the hazard ratio for Arm B vs. Arm A (referent) was 0.73 (95% CI = 0.49, 1.09, P=0.06, 1-sided log rank test). Both results were significant at the pre-specified 1-sided 0.10 alpha level. Of 27 patients on arm A who crossed over to F+B at progression, 4 (15%) were progression-free for at least 24 weeks and had periods of disease control that were longer than when treated with F alone. Conclusion: Adding bortezomib to fulvestrant in AI-resistant ER-positive MBC enhances its effectiveness by delaying acquired fulvestrant resistance. These results support additional evaluation of proteasome inhibitors in combination with SERDs. Acknowledgement: Supported by contract N01-CM-62204 to the New York Cancer Consortium (P.I. J. Sparano) and grant P30 CA013330 (P.I. D. Goldman) from the National Institutes of Health, and by a grant from Millennium, Inc. Citation Format: Kerin B Adelson, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Joseph A Sparano, Paul J Christos, John J Wright, George Raptis, Miguel C Villalona, Cynthia X Ma, Dawn Hershman, Joseph Baar, Paula Klein, Tessa Cigler, G Thomas Budd, Yelena Novik, Antoinette R Tan, Susan Tannenbaum, Anupama Goel, Ellis Levine, Charles L Shapiro, Eleni Andreopoulou, Michael Naughton, Kevin Kalinsky, Samuel Waxman, Doris Germain. Randomized phase II trial of fulvestrant alone or in combination with bortezomib in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors: A New York cancer consortium trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-03.

The identification of recurring chromosomal translocations has provided clues to the gene regions important in lymphoma development. Among 157 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma studied by cytogenetic analysis, four new recurring translocations have been identified--t(8;9) (q24;p13), t(11;18)(q21;q21), t(14,15)(q32;q15), and an unbalanced translocation giving rise to der(22)t(17;22) (q11;p11). Each translocation appeared twice. The t(11;18) was the only karyotypic abnormality in the two patients with it, and the t(14;15) was the sole karyotypic abnormality in one patient. All translocations were found in B-cell malignancies and were associated with both nodal and extranodal disease. Among the regions affected, only the immunoglobulin heavy- chain gene MYC, and BCL2, have thus far been associated with lymphoma. The breakpoint sites identified by these translocations warrant further investigation at the molecular level.

Although many recurring chromosome abnormalities have been found in malignant lymphoma (ML) in recent years, their relationship to histology remains largely undefined. We have correlated, in the same tumor mass, chromosome findings with histology, defined by the International Working Formulation for Clinical Usage, in 120 patients. We find differences among histologies in the frequency of normal metaphases and the modal number of the predominant abnormal clone. In addition, most histologies have been significantly (P less than .01) associated with specific chromosome abnormalities. In particular, ML, follicular, predominantly small cleaved cell was associated with t(14;18)(q32;q21); ML, follicular, mixed small cleaved cell and large cell with t(14;18)(q32;q21) and trisomy 8; ML, follicular, predominantly large cell with trisomy 7 and breaks in 17q21-q25; ML, diffuse, mixed small cell and large cell with breaks in 11p; ML, diffuse, large cell with trisomy 21 and breaks in 2q and 9q; ML, large cell, immunoblastic with breaks at 6q21; and ML, small noncleaved cell with t(8;14)(q24;q32). Only the associations with t(14;18) and t(8;14) have been previously reported. The associated chromosome abnormality usually occurred in 30% to 70% of a given histology, raising the possibility that cytogenetics may add important prognostic information in lymphoma as it does in the acute leukemias.

Germ cell tumors (GCTs) account for 95% of testicular cancers. Testicular GCTs constitute the most common solid tumor in men between the ages of 20 and 34 years, and the incidence of testicular GCTs has been increasing in the past 2 decades. Testicular GCTs are classified into 2 broad groups--pure seminoma and nonseminoma--which are treated differently. Pure seminomas, unlike nonseminomas, are more likely to be localized to the testis at presentation. Nonseminoma is the more clinically aggressive tumor associated with elevated serum concentrations of alphafetoprotein (AFP). The diagnosis of a seminoma is restricted to pure seminoma histology and a normal serum concentration of AFP. When both seminoma and elements of a nonseminoma are present, management follows that for a nonseminoma. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Testicular Cancer outline the diagnosis, workup, risk assessment, treatment, and follow-up schedules for patients with both pure seminoma and nonseminoma.