Abstract P3-07-02: Time-trends in survival in young women with breast cancer in a SEER population-based study

Background: As mammography is not generally recommended to women under 40, it is reasonable to conclude that documented outcome improvements over time are attributable to treatment advances with screening playing a less important role. In order to determine the contribution of screening and treatment to improvements, we evaluated the odds of presenting with more advanced disease by time-period and examined the time-trends in outcome in a population-based cohort ≤50. We evaluated whether any outcomes differentials existed by ER status. Methods: Patients in SEER diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) were divided into 4 by year of diagnosis (1990–1994, 1995–1999, 2000–2004, 2005–2008). Patients were also categorized into 2 age-groups: Results: 110,629 patient records were included. Multivariate adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in women aged 40–50 with ER positive BC declined over time. Comparing all time periods to 1990–1994, the HR for mortality in 1995–1999 was 0.83 (0.77–0.89), 0.61 (0.57–0.65) in 2000–2004, and 0.35 (0.30–0.40) in 2005–2008 (p A 1.3-fold increase in the odds of presenting with stage I BC was seen in women 40–50 years comparing the 3 latter time periods with 1990–1994. Similarly, in the same age group, there was a 2.12-fold likelihood of presenting with a tumor ≤1cm in 2005–2008 versus 1990–1994. In women Conclusions: Patients who are ER positive and between 40–50 years have had time-trend changes with improvements in breast cancer outcome and smaller tumors likely attributable to both screening and hormonal therapies. Patients who are Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-02.