To authenticate to the full-text of this article, please visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01096.x Keywords: biofuel plantation; compensation point; oil-palm plantation biodiversity; oil-palm plantation emission; palm-oil production impact; peatland conversion; plantation development Abstract: Abstract: The growing demand for biofuels is promoting the expansion of a number of agricultural commodities, including oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). Oil-palm plantations cover over 13 million ha, primarily in Southeast Asia, where they have directly or indirectly replaced tropical rainforest. We explored the impact of the spread of oil-palm plantations on greenhouse gas emission and biodiversity. We assessed changes in carbon stocks with changing land use and compared this with the amount of fossil-fuel carbon emission avoided through its replacement by biofuel carbon. We estimated it would take between 75 and 93 years for the carbon emissions saved through use of biofuel to compensate for the carbon lost through forest conversion, depending on how the forest was cleared. If the original habitat was peatland, carbon balance would take more than 600 years. Conversely, planting oil palms on degraded grassland would lead to a net removal of carbon within 10 years. These estimates have associated uncertainty, but their magnitude and relative proportions seem credible. We carried out a meta-analysis of published faunal studies that compared forest with oil palm. We found that plantations supported species-poor communities containing few forest species. Because no published data on flora were available, we present results from our sampling of plants in oil palm and forest plots in Indonesia. Although the species richness of pteridophytes was higher in plantations, they held few forest species. Trees, lianas, epiphytic orchids, and indigenous palms were wholly absent from oil-palm plantations. The majority of individual plants and animals in oil-palm plantations belonged to a small number of generalist species of low conservation concern. As countries strive to meet obligations to reduce carbon emissions under one international agreement (Kyoto Protocol), they may not only fail to meet their obligations under another (Convention on Biological Diversity) but may actually hasten global climate change. Reducing deforestation is likely to represent a more effective climate-change mitigation strategy than converting forest for biofuel production, and it may help nations meet their international commitments to reduce biodiversity loss. Abstract (Spanish): Plantaciones de Biocombustible en Terrenos Boscosos: Doble Peligro para la Biodiversidad y el Clima Resumen: La creciente demanda de biocombustibles esta promoviendo la expansion de activos agricolas, incluyendo la palma de aceite (Elaeis guineensis). Las plantaciones de palma de aceite cubren mas de 13 millones de ha, principalmente en el sureste de Asia, donde han reemplazado a bosques tropicales directa o indirectamente. Exploramos el impacto de la expansion de las plantaciones de palma de aceite sobre la emision de gases de invernadero y la biodiversidad. Evaluamos los cambios en las reservas de carbono con el cambio de uso de suelo y comparamos esto con la cantidad de emisiones de carbono de combustibles fosiles que se evitarian con su reemplazo por carbono de biocombustibles. Estimamos que pasarian entre 75 y 93 anos para que las emisiones de carbono ahorradas por el uso de biocombustible compensen el carbono perdido por la conversion de bosques, dependiendo de como fue removido el bosque. Si el habitat original era turbera, el balance de carbono tardaria mas de 600 anos, Por el contrario, sembrando las plantaciones de palma en pastizales degradados llevaria a una remocion de carbono en 10 anos. Estas estimaciones estan asociadas con incertidumbre, pero su magnitud y proporciones relativas parecen creibles. Realizamos un meta analisis de los estudios de fauna publicados que comparan bosques con palma de aceite. Encontramos que las plantaciones soportan comunidades de baja riqueza con pocas especies de bosque. Debido a que no se dispuso de datos de flora publicados, presentamos los resultados de nuestro muestreo de plantas en parcelas de palma de aceite y de bosque en Indonesia. Aunque la riqueza de especies de pteridofitas fue mayor en las plantaciones, contenian pocas especies de bosque. Arboles, lianas, orquideas epifitas y palmas nativas estuvieron totalmente ausentes de las plantaciones de palma de aceite. La mayoria de plantas y animales individuales en las plantaciones de palma de aceite pertenecian a un pequeno numero de especies generalistas de bajo interes para la conservacion. A medida que los paises pugnan por cumplir las obligaciones de reduccion de emisiones de carbono en el marco de un acuerdo internacional (Protocolo de Kioto), no solo pueden fallar en cumplir sus obligaciones en el marco de otro (Convencion de Diversidad Biologica) sino que incluso pueden acelerar el cambio climatico. La reduccion de la deforestacion probablemente represente una estrategia mas efectiva para la mitigacion del cambio climatico que la conversion de bosques para la produccion de biocombustibles, y puede ayudar a que las naciones cumplan sus compromisos internacionales para la reduccion de la perdida de biodiversidad. Author Affiliation: (*)NORDECO, Skindergade 23-III, Copenhagen DK-1159, Denmark, emailfd@nordeco.dk ([dagger])University of Groningen, P. O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, Netherlands ([double dagger])Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom (s.)World Wildlife Fund USA, 1250 24th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20090-7180, U.S.A. (**)Global Environment Centre, 2nd Floor, Wisma Hing, 78, Jalan SS2/72, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia ([dagger][dagger])Institute for Environmental Sciences, University Koblenz-Landau, Fortstra[sz]e 7, D-76829 Landau, Germany ([double dagger][double dagger])RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom (s.s.)CIFOR, P.O. BOX 6596, JKPWB, Jakarta, Indonesia (***)IBED, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, Netherlands ([dagger][dagger][dagger])Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom ([double dagger][double dagger][double dagger])Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, United Kingdom (s.s.s.)School of Environmental Services, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom Article History: Paper submitted February 4, 2008; revised manuscript accepted August 20, 2008.