Search

Emergency dispatch centres receive emergency calls and assign resources. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) can be classified as appropriate (requiring emergent response) or inappropriate (requiring non-emergent response) for resuscitation. We sought to determine system accuracy in emergency medical services (EMS) OHCA response allocation.We analyzed EMS-assessed non-traumatic OHCA records from the British Columbia (BC) Cardiac Arrest registry (January 1, 2019-June 1, 2021), excluding EMS-witnessed cases. In BC the "Medical Priority Dispatch System" is used. We classified EMS dispatch as "emergent" or "non-emergent" and compared to the gold standard of whether EMS personnel decided treatment was appropriate upon scene arrival. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), with 95% CI's.Of 15,371 non-traumatic OHCAs, the median age was 65 (inter quartile range 51-78), and 4834 (31%) were women; 7152 (47%) were EMS-treated, of whom 651 (9.1%) survived). Among EMS-treated cases 6923/7152 had an emergent response (sensitivity = 97%, 95% CI 96-97) and among EMS-untreated cases 3951/8219 had a non-emergent response (specificity = 48%, 95% CI, 47 to 49). Among cases with emergent dispatch, 6923/11191 were EMS-treated (PPV = 62%, 95% CI 61-62), and among those with non-emergent dispatch, 3951/4180 were EMS-untreated (NPV = 95%, 95% CI 94-95); 229/4180 (5.5%) with a non-emergent dispatch were treated by EMS.The dispatch system in BC has a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in sending the appropriate responses for OHCAs deemed appropriate for treatment by paramedics. Future research may address strategies to increase system specificity, and decrease the incidence of non-emergent dispatch to EMS-treated cases.

Systematic automated external defibrillator(AED) placement in schools may improve pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest(OHCA) survival. To estimate their utility, we identified school-located pediatric and adult OHCAs to estimate the potential utilization of school-located AEDs. Further, we identified all OHCAs within an AED-retrievable distance of the school by walking, biking, and driving.We used prospectively collected data from the British Columbia(BC) Cardiac Arrest Registry(2013-2020), and geo-plotted all OHCAs and schools(n = 824) in BC. We identified adult and pediatric(age 18 years) OHCAs occurring in schools, as well as nearby OHCAs for which a school-based externally-placed AED could be retrieved by a bystander prior to emergency medical system(EMS) arrival.Of 16,409 OHCAs overall in the study period, 28.6 % occurred during school hours. There were 301 pediatric OHCAs. 5(1.7 %) occurred in schools, of whom 2(40 %) survived to hospital discharge. Among both children and adults, 28(0.17 %) occurred in schools(0.0042/school/year), of whom 21(75 %) received bystander resuscitation, 4(14 %) had a bystander AED applied, and 14(50 %) survived to hospital discharge. For each AED, an average of 0.29 OHCAs/year(95 % CI 0.21-0.37), 0.93 OHCAs/year(95 % CI 0.69-1.56) and 1.69 OHCAs/year(95 % CI 1.21-2.89) would be within the potential retrieval distance of a school-located AED by pedestrian, cyclist and automobile retrieval, respectively, using the median EMS response times.While school-located OHCAs were uncommon, outcomes were favourable. 11.1% to 60.9% of all OHCAs occur within an AED-retrievable distance to a school, depending on retrieval method. Accessible external school-located AEDs may improve OHCA outcomes of school children and in the surrounding community.

Background: British Columbia 8-1-1 callers who are advised by a nurse to seek urgent medical care can be referred to virtual physicians (VPs) for supplemental assessment and advice. Prior research indicates callers’ subsequent health service use may diverge from VP advice. We sought to 1) estimate concordance between VP advice and subsequent health service use, and 2) identify factors associated with concordance to understand potential drivers of discordant cases.Methods: We linked relevant provincial administrative databases to obtain inpatient, outpatient, and emergency service use by callers. We developed operational definitions of concordance collaboratively with researcher, patient, VP, and management perspectives. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to describe health service use post-VP consultation and Cox regression to estimate the association of caller factors (rurality, demography, attachment to primary care) and call factors (reason, triage level, time of day) with concordance as hazard ratios.Results: We analyzed 17,188 calls from November 16, 2020 to April 30, 2021. Callers advised to attend an emergency department (ED) immediately were the most concordant (73%) while concordance was lowest for those advised to seek Family Physician (FP) care either immediately (41%) or within 7 days (47%). Callers unattached to FPs were less likely to schedule an FP visit (hazard ratio = 0.76 [95%CI: 0.68–0.85]). Rural callers were less likely to attend an ED within 48 hours when advised to go immediately (0.53 [95%CI:0.46–0.61]) compared to urban callers. Rural callers advised to see an FP, either immediately (1.28 [95%CI:1.01–1.62]) or within 7 days (1.23 [95%CI: 1.11–1.37]), were more likely to do so than urban callers.Interpretation: Concordance between VP advice and subsequent caller health service use varies substantially by category of advice and caller rurality. Concordance with advice to “Go to ED” is high overall but to access primary care is below 50%, suggesting potential issues with timely access to FP care. Future research from a patient/caller centered perspective may reveal additional barriers and facilitators to concordance.

Drone-delivered automated external defibrillators (AEDs) may reduce delays to defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). We sought to determine how integration of drones and selection of drone bases between emergency service stations (i.e., paramedic, fire, police) would affect 9-1-1 call-to-arrival intervals.We identified all treated OHCAs in southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada from Jan. 2014 to Dec. 2020. We developed mathematical models to select 1-5 optimal drone base locations from each of: paramedic stations, fire stations, police stations, or an unrestricted grid-based set of points to minimize drone travel time to OHCAs. We evaluated models on the estimated first response interval assuming that drones were integrated with existing OHCA response. We compared median response intervals with historical response, as well as across drone base locations.A total of 1610 OHCAs were included in the study with a historical median response interval of 6.4 minutes (IQR 5.0-8.6). All drone-integrated response systems significantly reduced the median response interval to 4.2-5.4 minutes (all P 0.001), with grid-based stations using 5 drones resulting in the lowest response interval (4.2 minutes). Median response times between drone base location types differed by 6-16 seconds, all comparisons of which were statistically significant (all P 0.02).Integrating drone-delivered AEDs into OHCA response may reduce first response intervals, even with a small quantity of drones. Implementing drone response with only one emergency service resulted in similar response metrics regardless of the emergency service hosting the drone base and was competitive with unrestricted drone base locations.

Half of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are deemed inappropriate for resuscitation by emergency medical services (EMS). We investigated patient characteristics and reasons for non-treatment of OHCAs, and determined the proportion involving illicit drug use.We reviewed consecutive EMS-untreated OHCA from the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry (2019-2020). We abstracted patient characteristics and categorized reasons for EMS non-treatment: (1) prolonged interval from the OHCA to EMS arrival ("non-recent OHCA") with or without signs of "obvious death"; (2) do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order; (3) terminal disease; (4) verbal directive; and (5) unspecified. We abstracted clinical details regarding a history of, or evidence at the scene of, illicit drug use.Of 13 331 cases, 5959 (45%) were not treated by EMS. The median age was 67 (IQR 54-81) and 1903 (32%) were female. EMS withheld resuscitation due to: non-recent OHCA, with and without signs of "obvious death" in 4749 (80%) and 108 (1.8%), respectively; DNR order in 952 (16%); terminal disease in 77 (1.3%); family directive in 41 (0.69%); and unspecified in 32 (0.54%). Overall and among those with non-recent OHCA, 695/5959 (12%) and 691/4857 (14%) had either a history of or evidence of recent illicit drug use, respectively.A prolonged interval from the OHCA until EMS assessment was the predominant reason for withholding treatment. Innovative solutions to decrease this interval may increase the proportion of OHCA that are treated by EMS and overall outcomes. Targeted interventions for illicit-drug use-related OHCAs may add additional benefit.

Importance Emergency research is challenging to do well as it involves time sensitive interventions in unstable patients. There is limited time to obtain informed consent from the patient or their legally authorized representative (LAR). Such research is permitted under exception from informed consent (EFIC) if specific criteria are met, including notification after enrollment. Some question whether the risks of EFIC outweighs its benefits. To date, there is limited empiric information about time to notification (TTN) and rates of withdrawal in such trials. Objective To describe variation in TTN and rates of withdrawal among that patients enrolled in EFIC trials over a twelve-year period. Design We performed post hoc descriptive analyses of data from five trials conducted under EFIC. Setting Emergency medical services and receiving hospitals participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium in the United States and Canada. Participants Patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest or life-threatening traumatic injury. Exposures Notification strategies were specified at each site before initiation of enrollment by a local institutional review board. We monitored TTN within each site centrally throughout each study’s enrollment period. Outcomes TTN was defined as time from randomization to first-reported notification of patient or LAR of enrollment. Withdrawal was defined as patient or LAR opt out of ongoing participation at the time of notification. Results Of 35,442 patients enrolled in five trials, 33,805 had cardiac arrest; and 1636 had traumatic injury. TTN varied overall and by patient outcome. Among those with cardiac arrest, TTN ranged from median (5%ile, 95%ile) of 6 (1,27) days to 28 (2, 53) days across sites. 0.3% of notified patients with cardiac arrest withdrew. Among those with traumatic injury, TTN ranged from 0 (0, 5) days to 36 (5, 68) days across sites. 7.7% of notified patients with traumatic injury withdrew. Conclusions and Relevance There is large variation in TTN in trials conducted under EFIC for emergency research. This may be due to several factors. It may or may not be modifiable. Overall rates of withdrawal are low, which suggests current practices related to EFIC are acceptable to those who have participated in emergency research.

There is substantial regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. We investigated whether regional emergency medical services (EMS) intra-arrest transport (IAT) practices are associated with patient outcomes.We performed a secondary analysis of a multi-center North American clinical trial dataset, which enrolled EMS-treated adult OHCA cases from 49 regional population-based clusters. The exposure of interest was regional-level intra-arrest transport (IAT), calculated as the proportion of cases in each cluster transported to hospital prior to return of spontaneous circulation, examined as quartiles and as a continuous variable. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression modeling estimated the association between regional IAT with survival to hospital discharge and favorable neurologic status (modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3) at hospital discharge.Of 26,148 subjects (median age 68 years; 36% female; 23% shockable initial rhythm) 2424 (9.3%), survived to hospital discharge and 1993 (7.6%) had favourable neurological outcomes. Across regional clusters, IAT ranged from 0.84% to 75% (quartiles6.2%, 6.2-19.6%, 19.6-30.4%, and ≥30.4%). For each quartile, 13.3%, 7.9%, 7.4%, and 4.8% survived, and 10.4%, 7.8%, 7.4%, and 4.8% had favourable neurological status. Regional IAT (per 10% change) was associated with decreased probability of survival (AOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.91) and favorable neurological outcome (AOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.85).Treatment within a region that utilizes IAT less frequently was associated with improved clinical outcomes at hospital discharge. These findings may account for some of the known regional variation in OHCA outcomes.

Introduction In pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) the effect of intraosseous (IO) or intravenous (IV) access on outcomes is unclear. Methods We analyzed prospectively collected data of non-traumatic OHCA in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium registry from 2011 to 2015. We included EMS-treated patients ≤17 years of age, classified patients based on vascular access routes, and calculated success rates of IO and IV attempts. After excluding patients with obvious non-cardiac etiologies and those with unsuccessful vascular access or multiple routes, we fit a logistic regression model to evaluate the association of IO vascular access (reference IV access) with the primary outcome of survival, using multiple imputation to address missing data. We analyzed a subgroup of patients at least 2 years of age. Results There were 1549 non-traumatic OHCA: 895 (57.8%) patients had an IO line attempted with 822 (91.8%) successful; 488 (31.5%) had an IV line attempted with 345 (70.7%) successful (difference 21%, 95% CI 17 to 26%). Of the 761 patients included in our logistic regression, 601 received IO (30 [5.2%] survived) and 160 received IV (40 [25%] survived) vascular access. Intraosseous access was associated with a decreased probability of survival (adjusted OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.21–0.98). Patients at least 2 years of age showed a similar association (adjusted OR 0.36; CI 0.15–0.86). Conclusions Intraosseous access was associated with decreased survival among pediatric non-traumatic OHCA. These results are exploratory and support the need for further study to evaluate the effect of intravascular access method on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A large, randomized trial showed no significant difference in survival to discharge between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategies of 30 compressions with pause for 2 ventilations per cycle (30:2) and continuous chest compression with asynchronous ventilations (CCC). Data from the same trial suggested that adherence to the intended CPR strategy was associated with significantly greater survival. We sought to determine the adherence rate with intended strategy and then explore the association of adherence with survival to discharge in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC). METHODS: This secondary analysis of data from the ROC included three interventional trials and a prospective registry. We modified an automated software algorithm that classified care as 30:2 or CCC before intubation based on compression segment length (defined as the elapsed time from start of compressions to subsequent pause of ≥2 seconds), number of pauses per minute ≥2 seconds in length and chest compression fraction. Intended CPR strategy for individual agencies was based on study randomization (during trial phase) or local standard of care (during registry phase). We defined CPR delivered as adherent when its classification matched the intended strategy. We characterized adherence with intended strategy across trial and registry periods. We examined its association with survival to hospital discharge using multivariate logistic regression after adjustment for Utstein and other potential confounders. Effect modification with intended strategy was assessed through a multiplicative interaction term. RESULTS: Included were 26,810 adults with out of hospital cardiac arrest, of which 10,942 had an intended strategy of 30:2 and 15,868 an intended strategy of CCC. The automated algorithm classified 12,276 cases as CCC, 7,037 as 30:2 and left 7,497 as unclassified. Adherence to intended strategy was 54.4%; this differed by intended strategy (58.6% for CCC vs 48.3% for 30:2). Overall adherence was less during the registry phase as compared to during the trial phase(s). The association between adherence and survival was modified by treatment arm (CCC OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.64–0.81 vs 30:2 OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.90–1.22; interaction p-value

To compare walking access times to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) between area-level quintiles of socioeconomic status (SES) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases occurring in 2 major urban regions of Canada and France.This was an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult, non-traumatic OHCA cases in the metropolitan Vancouver (Canada) and Rhône County (France) regions that occurred between 2014 and 2018. We calculated area-level SES for each case, using quintiles of country-specific scores (Q5 = most deprived). We identified AED locations from local registries. The primary outcome was the simulated walking time from the OHCA location to the closest AED (continuous and dichotomized by a 3-minute 1-way threshold). We fit multivariate models to analyze the association between OHCA-to-AED walking time and outcomes (Q5 vs others).A total of 6,187 and 3,239 cases were included from the Metro Vancouver and Rhône County areas, respectively. In Metro Vancouver Q5 areas (vs Q1-Q4), areas, AEDs were farther from (79 % over 400 m from case vs 67 %, p 0.001) and required longer walking times to (97 % above 3 min vs 91 %, p 0.001) cases. In Rhône Q5 areas, AEDs were closer than in other areas (43 % over 400 m from case vs 50 %, p = 0.01), yet similarly poorly accessible (85 % above 3 min vs 86 %, p = 0.79). In multivariate models, AED access time ≥ 3 min was associated with decreased odds of survival at hospital discharge in Metro Vancouver (odds ratio 0.41, 95 % CI [0.23-0.74], p = 0.003).Accessibility of public AEDs was globally poor in Metro Vancouver and Rhône, and even poorer in Metro Vancouver's socioeconomically deprived areas.

Background: British Columbia, like many jurisdictions, has a health information telephone service (8-1-1) to provide callers with information by registered nurses and help them decide whether to attend an emergency department or primary care clinic, or manage their concern at home. We describe a new service, HealthLink BC Emergency iDoctor-in-assistance (HEiDi), that partnered physicians available by videoconferencing with 8-1-1 registered nurses to support callers. Methods: From Apr. 6 to Aug. 2, 2020, all callers to the 8-1-1 telephone service (available to anyone in BC) categorized as “seek care within 24 hours” by registered nurses were eligible for referral to HEiDi. HEiDi physicians (“virtual physicians”) connected directly with callers via desktop videoconferencing software, assessed their health complaint, provided advice and suggested care disposition. We conducted a descriptive study and collected demographic characteristics, health concern and disposition determined by the virtual physician. Results: HEiDi virtual physicians provided 7687 consultations. Most patients (n = 4439, 57.8%) were in the 20–64 age range, and 4814 (62.9%) were female. Common health concerns were related to gastroenterology (n = 1275, 16.6%), respiratory (n = 877, 11.4%) and dermatology (n = 874, 11.4%). From the 7531 calls with available data, 2548 (33.8%) callers were advised to attempt home treatment, 2885 (38.3%) to contact a primary care physician within 1 week, 1131 (15.0%) to attend an emergency department immediately and 538 (7.1%) to attend their primary provider now. Interpretation: We found that virtual physicians were able to advise nearly 3 out of 4 (72.1%) patients away from in-person emergency or clinic assessment and 1 in 7 (15.0%) to seek immediate emergency department care. Virtual physicians can provide an effective complement to a provincial health telephone system.

Background Sudden cardiac death remains a leading cause of mortality in Canada, resulting in more than 35,000 deaths annually. Most cardiac arrest victims collapse in their own home (85% of the time) and 50% are witnessed by a family member or bystander. Survivors have a quality of life similar to the general population, but the overall survival rate for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) rarely exceeds 8%. Victims are almost four times more likely to survive when receiving bystander CPR, but bystander CPR rates have remained low in Canada over the past decade, not exceeding 15–25% until recently. Telecommunication-assisted CPR instructions have been shown to significantly increase bystander CPR rates, but agonal breathing may be misinterpreted as a sign of life by 9–1-1 callers and telecommunicators, and is responsible for as much as 50% of missed OHCA diagnoses. We sought to improve the ability and speed with which ambulance telecommunicators can recognize OHCA over the phone, initiate timely CPR instructions, and improve survival. Methods In this multi-center national study, we will implement and evaluate an educational program developed for ambulance telecommunicators using a multiple baseline interrupted time-series design. We will compare outcomes 12 months before and after the implementation of a 20-min theory-based educational video addressing barriers to recognition of OHCA while in the presence of agonal breathing. Participating Canadian sites demonstrated prior ability to collect standardized data on OHCA. Data will be collected from eligible 9–1-1 recordings, paramedic documentation and hospital medical records. Eligible cases will include suspected or confirmed OHCA of presumed cardiac origin in patients of any age with attempted resuscitation. Discussion The ability of telecommunication-assisted CPR instructions to improve bystander CPR and survival rates for OHCA victims is undeniable. The ability of telecommunicators to recognize OHCA over the phone is unequivocally impeded by relative lack of training on agonal breathing, and reluctance to initiate CPR instructions when in doubt. Our pilot data suggests the potential impact of this project will be to increase absolute OHCA recognition and bystander CPR rates by at least 10%, and absolute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival by 5% or more. Trial registration Prospectively registered on March 28, 2019 at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03894059.

Post-resuscitation prognostic biomarkers for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes have not been fully elucidated. We examined the association of acid-base blood values (pH) with patient outcomes and calculated the pH test performance to predict prognosis.This was a post-hoc analysis of data from the continuous chest compression trial, which enrolled non-traumatic adult emergency medical system-treated OHCA in Canada and the United States. We examined cases who survived a minimum of 24 h post hospital arrival. The independent variables of interest were initial pH, final pH, and the change in pH (δpH). The primary outcome was neurological status at hospital discharge, with favorable status defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 3. We reported adjusted odds ratios for favorable neurological outcome using multivariable logistic regression models. We calculated the test performance of increasing pH thresholds in 0.1 increments to predict unfavorable neurological status (defined as mRS3) at hospital discharge.We included 4189 patients. 32% survived to hospital discharge with favorable neurological status. In the adjusted analysis, higher initial pH (OR 6.82; 95% CI 3.71-12.52) and higher final pH (OR 7.99; 95% CI 3.26-19.62) were associated with higher odds of favorable neurological status. pH thresholds with highest positive predictive values were initial pH 6.8 (92.5%; 95% CI 86.2 %-98.8%) and final pH 7.0 (100%; 95% CI 95.2 %-100%).In patients with OHCA, pH values were associated with patients' subsequent neurological status at hospital discharge. Final pH may be clinically useful to predict unfavorable neurological status at hospital discharge.

To date in the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a decrease in patients accessing emergency health services, (EHS) but research has been conducted in areas with a very high incidence of COVID-19. In an area with a low COVID-19 incidence, we estimate changes in EHS use.We compared EHS encounters in British Columbia from March 15 (the date of school and business closures) to May 15, 2020, when compared to the same period in 2019. We categorized EHS encounters into 18 presenting complaints and prespecified critical care complaints including major trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We analyzed by descriptive methods.Comparing 2019 to 2020, total EHS encounters decreased from 83,925 (incidence rate 834 per 100,000 person-months) to 71,611 (incidence rate 701 per 100,000 person-months) for a decrease of 133 per 100,000 person-months (95% CI 126-141). The top 18 codes had a significant decrease in every category except respiratory and anxiety. Encounters for critically ill patients decreased significantly overall from 3019 to 2753 (incidence rate difference 3.1 per 100,000 person-months, 95% CI 1.6-4.5), including stroke, trauma, and STEMI, but the incidence of OHCA appeared stable.In a single province with a low incidence of COVID-19, there was a 15% reduction in overall EHS use and a 9% reduction in critical illness. EHS planners will need to match patient need with available resources.RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Jusqu’à présent dans la pandémie de Covid-19, il y a eu une diminution du nombre de patients ayant accès aux services de santé d'urgence, mais des recherches ont été menées dans des zones à très forte incidence de Covid-19. Dans une zone à faible incidence de Covid-19, nous estimons les changements dans l'utilisation des services de santé d’urgence. MéTHODES: Nous avons comparé les cas des services de santé d’urgence en Colombie-Britannique du 15 mars (date de fermeture des écoles et des entreprises) au 15 mai 2020, par rapport à la même période en 2019. Nous avons classé les cas des services de santé d’urgence en 18 plaintes de présentation et des plaintes de soins intensifs pré-spécifiées, y compris un traumatisme majeur, un arrêt cardiaque, un accident vasculaire cérébral et un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST. Nous avons analysé par des méthodes descriptives. RéSULTATS : En comparant 2019 à 2020, le nombre total des cas des services de santé d’urgence est passé de 83 925 (taux d'incidence de 834 pour 100 000 personnes-mois) à 71 611 (taux d'incidence de 701 pour 100 000 personnes-mois) pour une diminution de 133 pour 100 000 personnes-mois (IC à 95 % 126 à 141). Les 18 codes principaux ont connu une diminution significative dans toutes les catégories, sauf respiratoire et anxiété. Les cas chez les patients gravement malades ont globalement diminué de manière significative de 3 019 à 2 753 (différence de taux d'incidence de 3,1 pour 100 000 personnes-mois, IC à 95 % de 1,6 à 4,5), y compris les accidents vasculaires cérébraux, les traumatismes et les STEMI, mais l'incidence des arrêts cardiaque hors hôpital semble stable. CONCLUSIONS: Dans une seule province avec une faible incidence de Covid-19, il y a eu une réduction de 15 % de l'utilisation globale des services de santé d’urgence et une réduction de 9 % des maladies graves. Les organisateurs des services de santé d’urgence devront faire correspondre les besoins des patients avec les ressources disponibles.

Background Rapid emergency medical service (EMS) response after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major determinant of survival, however this is typically measured until EMS vehicle arrival. We sought to investigate whether the interval from EMS vehicle arrival to patient attendance (curb-to-care interval [CTC]) was associated with patient outcomes. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of the “CCC Trial” dataset, which includes EMS-treated adult non-traumatic OHCA. We fit an adjusted logistic regression model to estimate the association between CTC interval (divided into quartiles) and the primary outcome (survival with favourable neurologic status at hospital discharge; mRS ≤ 3). We described the CTC interval distribution among enrolling clusters. Results We included 24,685 patients: median age was 68 (IQR 56–81), 23% had initial shockable rhythms, and 7.6% survived with favourable neurological status. Compared to the first quartile (≤62 seconds), longer CTC quartiles (63 to 115, 116 to 180, and ≥181 seconds) demonstrated the following associations with survival with favourable neurological status: adjusted odds ratios 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.09; 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89; 0.66, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.77, respectively. Of the 49 study clusters, median CTC intervals ranged from 86 (IQR 58–130) to 179 seconds (IQR 112–256). Conclusion A lower CTC interval was associated with improved patient outcomes. These results demonstrate a wide range of access metrics within North America, and provide a rationale to create protocols to mitigate access obstacles. A two-minute CTC threshold may represent an appropriate target for quality improvement.

Objective We evaluated the effect of chest compression fraction (CCF) on survival to hospital discharge and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with non-shockable rhythms. Methods This is a retrospective analysis (completed in 2016) of a prospective cohort study which included OHCA patients from ten U.S. and Canadian sites (Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry and PRIMED study (2007–2011)). We included all OHCA victims of presumed cardiac aetiology, not witnessed by emergency medical services (EMS), without automated external defibrillator shock prior to EMS arrival, receiving > 1 min of CPR with CPR process measures available, and initial non-shockable rhythm. We measured CCF using the first 5 min of electronic CPR records. Results Demographics of 12,928 adult patients were: mean age 68; male 59.9%; public location 8.5%; bystander witnessed 35.2%; bystander CPR 39.3%; median interval from 911 to defibrillator turned on 10 min:04 s; initial rhythm asystole 64.8%, PEA 26.0%, other non-shockable 9.2%; compression rate 80−120/min (69.1%); median CCF 74%; ROSC 25.6%; survival to hospital discharge 2.4%. Adjusted odds ratio (OR); 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of survival for each CCF category were: 0−40% (2.00; 1.16, 3.32); 41−60% (0.83; 0.54, 1.24); 61−80% (1.02; 0.77, 1.35); and 81−100% (reference group). Adjusted (OR; 95%CI) of ROSC for each CCF category were: 0−40% (1.02; 0.79, 1.30); 41−60% (0.83; 0.72, 0.95); 61−80% (0.85; 0.77, 0.94); and 81−100% (reference group). Conclusions We observed an incremental benefit from higher CCF on the incidence of ROSC, but not survival, among non-shockable OHCA patients with CCF higher than 40%.

International audience; Aims: There are large differences between emergency medical systems, which may account for variability in outcomes. We seek to compare prehospital organizations, response modes, patient characteristics and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, between France and Canada, and discuss the need for the first European-North American prehospital research network on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Methods: Preliminary comparative description of data drawn from two nation-wide, population-based, Utstein-style prospectively implemented registries for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in France and Canada (France: RéAC, Canada: CanROC), covering approximately 80 million people, and soon to be participating in an international research network in 2020.Results: Since creation, 103,722 cases were included in France and approximately 99,317 in Canada. Data used in this work were drawn from 2011 to 2016, and comprised around 33,688 adult, non-traumatic, treated cases in Canada, and 55,358 in France, leading to estimated incidence rates of 75.3/100,000 inhabitants in France and 83/100,000 in Canada. In both countries, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest predominantly occurred in male patients, in their late sixties, at home, of presumed cardiac aetiology. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was provided in half of the cases. First assessed cardiac rhythm was shockable in 16% (France) vs. 22% (Canada). Professional resuscitation was attempted in 82% (France) and 60% (Canada). Prehospital organizations and response modes differed in the constitution of responding teams (France: physician-led advanced life support, Canada: trained paramedics), in response time intervals (call to first professional responders' arrival at scene 6.5 min (interquartile range IQR [5.2-8.3]) (Canada) vs. 10 min [7-15] (France)), in on-scene interventions, type of referral at hospital (France: systematic bypass of emergency department, tertiary hospital first, Canada: occasional bypass, mainly closest hospital first), and in outcomes (overall survival at hospital discharge in France: 5% vs. Canada: 11%).Conclusion: Despite similarities in some out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Utstein variables, several differences exist between French and Canadian prehospital systems, and ultimately, between outcomes. The creation of the ReACanROC research network will facilitate the conduction of further analyses to better understand predictors of this variability.

Background: Antiarrhythmic drugs have not proven to significantly improve overall survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia. How this might be influenced by the route of drug administration is not known. Methods: In this prespecified analysis of a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we compared the differences in survival to hospital discharge in adults with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who were randomly assigned by emergency medical services personnel to an antiarrhythmic drug versus placebo in the ALPS trial (Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo Study), when stratified by the intravenous versus intraosseous route of administration. Results: Of 3019 randomly assigned patients with a known vascular access site, 2358 received ALPS drugs intravenously and 661 patients by the intraosseous route. Intraosseous and intravenous groups differed in sex, time-to-emergency medical services arrival, and some cardiopulmonary resuscitation characteristics, but were similar in others, including time-to-intravenous/intrasosseous drug receipt. Overall hospital discharge survival was 23%. In comparison with placebo, discharge survival was significantly higher in recipients of intravenous amiodarone (adjusted risk ratio, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.06–1.50]; adjusted absolute survival difference, 5.5% [95% CI, 1.5–9.5]) and intravenous lidocaine (adjusted risk ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.02–1.45]; adjusted absolute survival difference, 4.7% [95% CI, 0.7–8.8]); but not in recipients of intraosseous amiodarone (adjusted risk ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.66–1.32]) or intraosseous lidocaine (adjusted risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.74–1.44]). Survival to hospital admission also increased significantly when drugs were given intravenously but not intraosseously, and favored improved neurological outcome at discharge. There were no outcome differences between intravenous and intraosseous placebo, indicating that the access route itself did not demarcate patients with poor prognosis. The study was underpowered to assess intravenous/intraosseous drug interactions, which were not statistically significant. Conclusions: We found no significant effect modification by drug administration route for amiodarone or lidocaine in comparison with placebo during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, point estimates for the effects of both drugs in comparison with placebo were significantly greater for the intravenous than for the intraosseous route across virtually all outcomes and beneficial only for the intravenous route. Given that the study was underpowered to statistically assess interactions, these findings signal the potential importance of the drug administration route during resuscitation that merits further investigation.

Longer emergency medical system cardiopulmonary-resuscitation-to-return of-spontaneous-circulation (EMS CPR-to-ROSC) interval has been associated with worse hospital discharge outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We hypothesized that this association extends post-discharge in hospital survivors. We investigated whether pre-arrest co-morbidities influence the duration of resuscitation.We included EMS-treated adult OHCA (January 2009 - December 2016) from British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry linked to provincial databases. Pre-OHCA characteristics were compared by ≤10, 10-20, and20 min interval categories. Outcomes included survival and functional outcomes at hospital discharge and 1- and 3-year survival. We examined the relationship between CPR-to-ROSC intervals and survival using Kaplan-Meier. We examined the relationship between the CPR-to-ROSC interval (continuous variable) with all outcomes using regression models.Among 10,241 OHCA, 4604 (45%) achieved ROSC, with a median CPR-to-ROSC interval of 15.5 (IQR 9.0-22.9) minutes. Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and prior myocardial infarction were associated with longer CPR-to-ROSC intervals. 1245 (12.2%) survived to hospital discharge. Among hospital survivors, Kaplan-Meier survival at 1- and 3-years were 92% [95% CI 90-93%] and 84% [95% CI 82-86%] respectively; survival curves stratified by CPR-to-ROSC intervals were not statistically different. Longer CPR-to-ROSC interval was non-linearly associated with lower survival and functional outcomes at hospital discharge but not with post-discharge outcomes.Longer CPR-to-ROSC interval was associated with lower survival at hospital discharge and was influenced by pre-arrest co-morbidities. However, these intervals were not associated with long-term survival or functional outcome among hospital survivors, suggesting early risk of longer CPR-to-ROSC intervals does not persist.

BackgroundEmergency department (ED) patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF) with underlying occult condition such as sepsis or heart failure, and who are managed with rate or rhythm control, have poor prognoses. Such conditions may not be easy to identify early in the ED evaluation when critical treatment decisions are made. We sought to develop a simple decision aid to quickly identify undifferentiated ED AFF patients who are at high risk of acute underlying illness.MethodsWe collected consecutive ED patients with electrocardiogram-proven AFF over a 1-year period and performed a chart review to ascertain demographics, comorbidities, and investigations. The primary outcome was having an acute underlying illness according to prespecified criteria. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the primary outcome, and developed criteria to identify those with an underlying illness at presentation.ResultsOf 1,083 consecutive undifferentiated ED AFF patients, 400 (36.9%) had an acute underlying illness; they were older with more comorbidities. Modeling demonstrated that three predictors (ambulance arrival; chief complaint of chest pain, dyspnea, or weakness; CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than 2) identified 93% of patients with acute underlying illness (95% confidence interval [CI], 91–96%) with 54% (95% CI, 50–58%) specificity. The decision aid missed 28 patients; (7.0%) simple blood tests and chest radiography identified all within an hour of presentation.ConclusionsIn ED patients with undifferentiated AFF, this simple predictive model rapidly differentiates patients at risk of acute underlying illness, who will likely merit investigations before AFF-specific therapy.

Background: While pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are relatively uncommon, they have a much higher number of potential years of life lost per event. School-located public access automated external defibrillators (AED) may be beneficial to school-aged OHCAs, but also other OHCAs within the school and in the surrounding community. We sought to identify the incidence of OHCAs within and nearby schools in British Columbia (BC), to estimate the number that may benefit from school-located AEDs. Methods: We used prospectively-collected data from the BC OHCA Registry from 2013 to 2018. We examined the addresses of all OHCAs to determine those occurring in public primary and secondary schools. We geo-plotted all OHCAs to identify the number of OHCAs within walking distance of a school. Assuming an average pedestrian speed for AED retrieval of 1.8 m/second, we calculated the number of school-vicinity OHCAs for which a bystander could retrieve an AED prior to a 6.5 minute emergency medical system response interval, assuming that AEDs would be located on the exterior of a school building. Results: There were a total of 401,423 children enrolled at 824 schools annually in the study footprint. Of a total of 12,480 EMS-treated OHCAs (220 aged < 18 years), 20 were in in schools, of which 4 were Conclusion: Outcomes of school-located OHCAs are encouraging, especially those with AED application. While the incidence of school-located OHCAs is low, a substantial proportion of OHCAs occur within a retrievable distance to a school, and thus accessible external school-located AEDs may improve overall OHCA outcomes of a community.

Introduction: Drone-delivered defibrillators may improve response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Prior studies have assumed that drones may be stationed at any police, fire, or paramedic station; however, cross-service implementation may not be logistically feasible. We sought to compare estimated response times by drone base location type. Methods: We included OHCAs (Jan. 2014 to Dec. 2020) in southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada where OHCA response includes fire and paramedic services. We created four models with candidate drone base locations at: police stations, fire stations, paramedic stations, and on a grid with 1 km sides as an optimistic model. We used mathematical optimization to select 1-5 drone bases for each model. Assuming a drone system had been in place during the study period and accounting for drone availability, we estimated 9-1-1 call-to-defibrillator intervals (measured to either drone, paramedic, or fire arrival) and calculated the proportion of OHCAs where a drone would arrive prior to fire and paramedic for each model. Median response times were compared to historical response using one-sided sign tests. Results: We included 1,610 OHCAs with a median historical response time of 6.4 mins (IQR 5.0-8.6). We identified 21 police stations, 59 fire stations, 21 paramedic stations, and 7,008 grid locations in the study area. Median 9-1-1 call-to-defibrillator intervals ranged from 4.3-5.3 mins for police, 4.3-5.3 mins for fire, 4.5-5.4 mins for paramedic, and 4.2-5.4 mins for grid locations (all P Conclusion: Locating drone bases at different types of emergency service stations significantly decreases 9-1-1 call-to-defibrillator intervals, while resulting in similar response intervals to those achieved using optimistic grid-optimal locations.

Introduction: Use of bystander-administered naloxone may lead to improved likelihood of recovery from opioid overdose. We sought to determine the accessibility of public access naloxone kits on nearby opioid overdose incidents if placed at public transit stops, compared to placing kits outside pharmacies or with existing public access automated external defibrillators (PADs). Methods: We included all incidents in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia responded to by British Columbia Emergency Health Services coded as a drug overdose with naloxone administered on-scene (Dec. 2014 to Aug. 2020). We geo-coded all public transit bus stops and used a mathematical optimization model to select bus stops where publicly accessible naloxone kits could be placed to maximize accessibility (defined as ≤100 m walking distance) to opioid overdoses. We evaluated accessibility on out-of-sample OHCAs using five-fold cross validation and compared against two baseline policies: placing publicly accessible naloxone kits at all pharmacies identified by the College of Pharmacists of British Columbia, and placing kits at all PADs identified by the British Columbia AED Registry. Statistical analysis was conducted using McNemar’s test. Results: We identified 14,318 opioid overdoses, 8,972 bus stops, 736 pharmacies, and 425 PADs. Accessibility of public naloxone kits for opioid overdose locations was 5.1% when placed at all pharmacies and 3.5% when placed with all existing PADs. Optimized naloxone kit placement using bus stops as candidate locations resulted in significantly higher accessibility than both pharmacy and PAD-based placement at 14.8% with 10 optimized locations (P Conclusion: Optimizing placement of public access naloxone kits at select public transit locations can provide significantly higher accessibility to opioid overdose locations compared to placement at pharmacies or at existing PAD locations.

ObjectiveClinical trials for patients with shock-refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), including the Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo (ALPS) trial, have been unable to demonstrate definitive benefit after treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs. A Bayesian approach, combining the available evidence, may yield additional insights.MethodsWe conducted a reanalysis of the ALPS trial comparing treatment with amiodarone or lidocaine with placebo in patients with OHCA following shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT). We used Bayesian regression to assess the probability of improved survival or improved neurological outcome on the 7-point modified Rankin Scale. We derived weak, moderate and strong priors from a previous clinical trial.ResultsThe original ALPS trial randomised 3026 adult patients with OHCA to amiodarone (n=974, survival to hospital discharge 24.4%), lidocaine, (n=993, survival 23.7%) or placebo (n=1059, survival 21.0%). In our reanalysis the probability of improved survival from amiodarone ranged from 83% (strong prior) to 95% (weak prior) compared with placebo and from 78% (strong) to 90% (weak) for lidocaine—an estimated improvement in survival of 2.9% (IQR 1.4%–3.8%) for amiodarone and 1.7% (IQR 0.84%–3.2%) for lidocaine over placebo (moderate prior). The probability of improved neurological outcome from amiodarone ranged from 96% (weak) to 99% (strong) compared with placebo and from 88% (weak) to 96% (strong) for lidocaine.ConclusionsIn a Bayesian reanalysis of patients with shock-resistant VF/VT OHCA, treatment with amiodarone had high probabilities of improved survival and neurological outcome, while treatment with lidocaine had a more modest benefit.

The optimal locations and cost-effectiveness of placing automated external defibrillators (AEDs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCAs) in urban residential neighbourhoods are unclear.We used prospectively collected data from 2016 to 2018 from the British Columbia OHCA Registry to examine the utilization and cost-effectiveness of hypothetical AED deployment in municipalities with a population of over 100 000. We geo-plotted OHCA events using seven hypothetical deployment models where AEDs were placed at the exteriors of public schools and community centers and fetched by bystanders. We calculated the "radius of effectiveness" around each AED within which it could be retrieved and applied to an individual prior to EMS arrival, comparing automobile and pedestrian-based retrieval modes. For each deployment model, we estimated the number of OHCAs within the "radius of effectiveness".We included 4017 OHCAs from ten urban municipalities. The estimated radius of effectiveness around each AED was 625 m for automobile and 240 m for pedestrian retrieval. With AEDs placed outside each school and community center, 2567 (64%) and 605 (15%) of OHCAs fell within the radii of effectiveness for automobile and pedestrian retrieval, respectively. For each AED, there was an average of 1.20-2.66 and 0.25-0.61 in-range OHCAs per year for automobile retrieval and pedestrian retrieval, respectively, depending on the deployment model. All of our proposed surpassed the cost-effectiveness threshold of 0.125 OHCA/AED/year provided 5.3-11.6% in-range AEDs were brought-to-scene.The systematic deployment of AEDs at schools and community centers in urban neighbourhoods may result in increased application and be a cost-effective public health intervention.

International audience; France and Canada prehospital systems and care delivery in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) show substantial differences. This article aims to describe the rationale, design, implementation and expected research implications of the international, population-based, France-Canada registry for OHCAs, namely ReACanROC, which is built from the merging of two nation-wide, population-based, Utstein-style prospectively implemented registries for OHCAs attended to by emergency medical services. Under the supervision of an international steering committee and research network, the ReACanROC dataset will be used to run in-depth analyses on the differences in organisational, practical and geographic predictors of survival after OHCA between France and Canada. ReACanROC is the first Europe-North America registry ever created to meet this goal. To date, it covers close to 80 million people over the two countries, and includes approximately 200 000 cases over a 10-year period.

BACKGROUND Emergency department (ED) patients with uncomplicated atrial fibrillation (AF) of less than 48 hours may be safely managed with rhythm control. Although both chemical-first and electrical-first strategies have been advocated, there are no comparative effectiveness data to guide clinicians. METHODS At six urban Canadian centers, ED patients ages 18 to 75 with uncomplicated symptomatic AF of less than 48 hours and CHADS2 score of 0 or 1 were randomized using concealed allocation in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following strategies: 1) chemical cardioversion with procainamide infusion, followed by electrical countershock if unsuccessful; or 2) electrical cardioversion, followed by procainamide infusion if unsuccessful. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients discharged within 4 hours of arrival. Secondary outcomes included ED length-of-stay (LOS); prespecified ED-based adverse events; and 30-day ED revisits, hospitalizations, strokes, deaths, and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS Eighty-four patients were analyzed: 41 in the chemical-first group and 43 in the electrical-first group. Groups were balanced in terms of age, sex, vital signs, and CHADS2 scores. All patients were discharged home, with 83 (99%) in sinus rhythm. In the chemical-first group, 13 of 41 patients (32%) were discharged within 4 hours compared to 29 of 43 patients (67%) in the electrical-first group (p = 0.001). In the chemical-first group, the median ED LOS was 5.1 hours (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.5 to 5.9 hours) compared to 3.5 hours (IQR = 2.4 to 4.6 hours) in the electrical-first group, for a median difference of 1.2 hours (95% confidence interval = 0.4 to 2.0 hours, p

Objectives Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation within CPR (ECPR) may improve survival among patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We evaluated outcomes after incorporating ECPR into a conventional resuscitation system. Methods We introduced a prehospital-activated ECPR protocol for select refractory OHCAs into one of four metropolitan regions in British Columbia. We prospectively identified ECPR-eligible patients in both the ECPR region and the three other regions to serve as the control group. We compared the proportion with favorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge (cerebral performance category ≤ 2) and used logistic regression to estimate the association with treatment region. Results The study was terminated prematurely due to changes in hospital protocols and COVID-19. In the ECPR region, 15/58 (25.9%) patients had favourable neurological outcomes owing to conventional resuscitation and 2/58 (3.4%) owing to ECPR, for a total of 17/58 (29.3%). In the control regions, 67/250 (26.8%) patients had a favourable outcome owing to conventional resuscitation, for a between-group difference of 2.5% (95% CI −10 to 15%). We did not detect a statistically significant association between treatment region and outcomes. Conclusion In this prematurely-terminated study of ECPR for refractory OHCA, we did not detect an association between a regional ECPR protocol and neurologically favorable outcomes. However, our data suggests that outcomes owing to conventional resuscitation were similar, with the potential for additional survivors due to ECPR therapies.