Search

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the benzodiazepine alprazolam (1 mg, administered orally) were compared between eight patients with panic disorder and eight age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. Subjects received orally administered placebo and alprazolam in a randomized, double-blind, single-dose crossover study. The elimination half-life, time of maximum plasma concentration, maximum concentration, volume of distribution, and clearance of alprazolam were similar for both groups. For each cohort, alprazolam treatment (vs. placebo) produced significant changes in typical benzodiazepine agonist effects, such as increased sedation and impaired cognitive performance on the digit-symbol substitution test. For the panic disorder group only, there was a significant increase in the subjective rating of"contented" and a reduction in the rating of "easily irritated." For the healthy volunteer group, alprazolam produced increases in ratings of "fatigued" and "slowed thinking," but also increases in ratings of "relaxed." In each group, alprazolam significantly increased the electroencephalographic (EEG) measure of relative beta amplitude (range, 13-30 Hz) compared with placebo. Concentration-EEG response curves fit a sigmoid E(max) model, and there was greater sensitivity to EEG effects, as measured by a 28% reduction in the EC50 value, in the panic disorder group compared with healthy control subjects. After alprazolam treatment, there was increased sensitivity to EEG and mood effects and fewer aversive effects in the panic disorder group compared with healthy subjects. There were no differences in the pharmacodynamic measures of sedation and cognition or differences in pharmacokinetics between the two groups.

The appearance of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants in the mid-1980s caused the discipline of clinical psychopharmacology to refocus attention to the topics of drug metabolism and drug interactions. This article reviews the metabolic profiles of some newer antidepressants, the clinical implications of metabolic properties, and research methodology that can be applied in determining which specific human cytochromes P450 (CYP) mediate metabolic pathways. Also reviewed are the relative activities of various new antidepressants as inhibitors of CYPs, and the benefits and drawbacks of in vivo and in vitro methodologies for identification and quantitation of drug interactions.

The activity of D-fenfluramine, L-fenfluramine, and phentermine as inhibitors of five human cytochromes P450 was evaluated using human liver microsomes in vitro. All three compounds produced negligible inhibition of P450-1A2, -2C9, -2E1, and -3A. Phentermine also did not inhibit P450-2D6. However, D- and L-fenfluramine significantly inhibited P450-2D6 activity as measured by dextromethorphan O-demethylation, with mean 50% inhibitory concentrations (15.1 microM) within one order of magnitude of that for fluoxetine (2.7 microM). Findings from the in vitro assay are consistent with clinical studies showing significant inhibition of desipramine clearance by coadministration of fenfluramine.

Biotransformation of the H-1 antagonist terfenadine to its desalkyl and hydroxy metabolites was studied in vitro using microsomal preparations of human liver. These metabolic reactions are presumed to be mediated by Cytochrome P450-3A isoforms. The azole antifungal agent ketoconazole was a highly potent inhibitor of both reactions, having mean inhibition constants (Ki) of 0.037 and 0.34 microM for desalkyl- and hydroxy-terfenadine formation, respectively. Itraconazole also was a potent inhibitor, with Ki values of 0.28 and 2.05 microM, respectively. Fluconazole, on the other hand, was a weak inhibitor. Six selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants tested in this system were at least 20 times less potent inhibitors of terfenadine metabolism than was ketoconazole. An in vitro-in vivo scaling model used in vitro Ki values, typical clinically relevant plasma concentrations of inhibitors, and presumed liver:plasma partition ratios to predict the degree of terfenadine clearance impairment during coadministration of terfenadine with these inhibitors in humans. The model predicted a large and potentially hazardous impairment of terfenadine clearance by ketoconazole and, to a slightly lesser extent, by itraconazole. However, fluconazole and the six selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) at usual clinical doses were not predicted to impair terfenadine clearance to a degree that would be of clinical importance. Caution is nonetheless warranted with the coadministration of SSRIs and terfenadine when high doses of SSRIs (particularly fluoxetine) are administered. Also, some individuals may be unusually susceptible to metabolic inhibition for a variety of reasons.

In vitro preparations of human liver microsomes were used to study the inhibiting effects of two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants, paroxetine and fluvoxamine, on metabolism via hydroxylation of alprazolam and of desipramine. These reactions are mediated by Cytochromes P450-3A4 and P450-2D6, respectively. Paroxetine was a highly potent inhibitor of desipramine hydroxylation; the inhibition constant (Ki) value of 2.0 microM indicated greater inhibiting potency than fluoxetine or norfluoxetine. The in vitro data predicted in vivo impairment of desipramine clearance by coadministration of paroxetine which was in the same range as observed in a clinical study. Fluvoxamine, by contrast, was a much weaker inhibitor of desipramine hydroxylation, having a Ki value (16.6 microM) similar to those of sertraline and desmethylsertraline. For hydroxylation of alprazolam, paroxetine was a relatively weak inhibitor, approximately comparable to fluoxetine, whereas fluvoxamine showed inhibiting capacity similar to that of norfluoxetine. The in vitro data predicted the degree of impairment of alprazolam clearance observed in vitro model can therefore provide clinically relevant data on prediction of potential drug interactions with SSRIs.