Search

In this lecture, given in honour of Sir William Paton, a brilliant scientist and one of Britain's great patrons of biology, I give a personal account of the fundamental issues in colour vision that I have tackled since 1973, when I discovered a cortical zone lying outside the primary visual cortex that is rich in cells with chromatic properties. I do not provide an exhaustive review of colour vision but summarise how my views on colour vision and theories surrounding it have changed in light of that discovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this opinion essay, I address the perennial binding problem, that is to say of how independently processed visual attributes such as form, colour and motion are brought together to give us a unified and holistic picture of the visual world. A solution to this central issue in neurobiology remains as elusive as ever. No one knows today how it is implemented. The issue is not a new one and, though discussed most commonly in the context of the visual brain, it is not unique to it either. Karl Lashley summarized it well years ago when he wrote that a critical problem for brain studies is to understand how "the specialized areas of the cerebral cortex interact to provide the integration evident in thought and behaviour" (Lashley, 1931). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We outline what we believe could be an improvement in future discussions of the brain acting as a Bayesian‐Laplacian system. We do so by distinguishing between two broad classes of priors on which the brain's inferential systems operate: in one category are biological priors (β priors) and in the other artefactual ones (α priors). We argue that β priors, of which colour categories and faces are good examples, are inherited or acquired very rapidly after birth, are highly or relatively resistant to change through experience, and are common to all humans. The consequence is that the probability of posteriors generated from β priors having universal assent and agreement is high. By contrast, α priors, of which man‐made objects are examples, are acquired post‐natally and modified at various stages throughout post‐natal life; they are much more accommodating of, and hospitable to, new experiences. Consequently, posteriors generated from them are less likely to find universal assent. Taken together, in addition to the more limited capacity of experiment and experience to alter the β priors compared with α priors, another cardinal distinction between the two is that the probability of posteriors generated from β priors having universal agreement is greater than that for α priors. The two categories are distinct at the extremes; there is, however, a middle range where they merge into one another to varying extents, resulting in posteriors that draw upon both categories. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Results from a variety of sources, some many years old, lead ineluctably to a re-appraisal of the twin strategies of hierarchical and parallel processing used by the brain to construct an image of the visual world. Contrary to common supposition, there are at least three 'feed-forward' anatomical hierarchies that reach the primary visual cortex (V1) and the specialized visual areas outside it, in parallel. These anatomical hierarchies do not conform to the temporal order with which visual signals reach the specialized visual areas through V1. Furthermore, neither the anatomical hierarchies nor the temporal order of activation through V1 predict the perceptual hierarchies. The latter shows that we see (and become aware of) different visual attributes at different times, with colour leading form (orientation) and directional visual motion, even though signals from fast-moving, high-contrast stimuli are among the earliest to reach the visual cortex (of area V5). Parallel processing, on the other hand, is much more ubiquitous than commonly supposed but is subject to a barely noticed but fundamental aspect of brain operations, namely that different parallel systems operate asynchronously with respect to each other and reach perceptual endpoints at different times. This re-assessment leads to the conclusion that the visual brain is constituted of multiple, parallel and asynchronously operating task- and stimulus-dependent hierarchies ( STDH); which of these parallel anatomical hierarchies have temporal and perceptual precedence at any given moment is stimulus and task related, and dependent on the visual brain's ability to undertake multiple operations asynchronously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The human pulvinar is the largest thalamic area in terms of size and cortical connectivity. Although much is known about regional pulvinar structural anatomy, relatively little is known about pulvinar functional anatomy in humans. Cooccurrence of experimentally induced brain activity is a traditional metric used to establish interregional brain connectivity and forms the foundation of functional neuroimaging connectivity analyses. Because functional neuroimaging studies report task-related coactivations within a standardized space, meta-analysis of many whole-brain studies can define the brain's interregional coactivation across many tasks. Such an analysis can also detect and define variations in functional coactivations within a particular region. Here we use coactivation profiles reported in ∼ 7,700 functional neuroimaging studies to parcellate and define the pulvinar's functional anatomy. Parcellation of the pulvinar's coactivation profile identified five clusters per pulvinar of distinct functional coactivation. These clusters showed a high degree of symmetry across hemispheres and correspondence with the human pulvinar's cytoarchitecture. We investigated the functional coactivation profiles of each resultant pulvinar cluster with meta-analytic methods. By referencing existent neuroimaging and lesion-deficit literature, these profiles make a case for regional pulvinar specialization within the larger human attention-controlling network. Reference to this literature also informs specific hypotheses that can be tested in subsequent studies in healthy and clinical populations. Hum Brain Mapp 36:2417-2431, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We used magnetoencephalography ( MEG) to determine whether increasingly complex forms constituted from the same elements (lines) activate visual cortex with the same or different latencies. Twenty right-handed healthy adult volunteers viewed two different forms, lines and rhomboids, representing two levels of complexity. Our results showed that the earliest responses produced by lines and rhomboids in both striate and prestriate cortex had similar peak latencies (40 ms) although lines produced stronger responses than rhomboids. Dynamic causal modeling ( DCM) showed that a parallel multiple input model to striate and prestriate cortex accounts best for the MEG response data. These results lead us to conclude that the perceptual hierarchy between lines and rhomboids is not mirrored by a temporal hierarchy in latency of activation and thus that a strategy of parallel processing appears to be used to construct forms, without implying that a hierarchical strategy may not be used in separate visual areas, in parallel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current hierarchical models of the cerebral cortex are mainly based on qualitative connection studies. From wheatgerm-agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase injections, we examined the laminar patterns of projections to and between the three major subdivisions of the motion-processing lateral suprasylvian (LS) complex [areas posteromedial lateral suprasylvian area (PMLS), anteromedial lateral suprasylvian (AMLS), posterolateral lateral suprasylvian area (PLLS)] of cat extrastriate cortex and of an adjoining form-processing area, 21a. We counted ∼ 145,000 labelled projection cells in 20 cortical areas in 11 cats, and applied various analyses to the data, expressed as the percent supragranular layer (%SG) origin of each connection. We report two main results. (i) A wide range of %SG values was obtained, both from each individual cat and across the 163 projections examined. Nonetheless, both hierarchical and non-parametric cluster analyses of the pooled connection origins suggested the presence of three distinct laminar projection classes, constrained by graded %SG values of 0–33%, 39–69% and 76–97%. These conformed, respectively, to feedback, lateral and feedforward laminar patterns seen qualitatively in our material. (ii) Hierarchical connectivity analyses suggested that PMLS, AMLS and PLLS are ordered in a hierarchical sequence. Macaque motion areas V5/MT, MST and FST are arranged in a similar sequence, and areas at equivalent levels of the two motion hierarchies have some analogous functional specializations. Our findings provide the first objective support for the three laminar projection classes that underpin existing theoretical models of hierarchical cortical organization, and they suggest that the implementation of higher-order motion processing evolved along similar lines in the cat and monkey visual cortex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]