Search

Aim: We aimed to determine the macrovascular and microvascular outcomes of intensive versus standard glucose‐lowering strategies in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and investigate the relationships between these outcomes and trial arm glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction. Materials and Methods: In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, we identified relevant trials from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and bibliographies up to August 2023. Macrovascular and microvascular outcomes, along with safety outcomes, were evaluated. Pooled study‐specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and meta‐regression was employed to analyse the relationships between outcomes and HbA1c reduction. Results: We included 11 unique RCTs involving 51 469 patients with T2D (intensive therapy, N = 26 691; standard therapy, N = 24 778). Intensive versus standard therapy reduced the risk of non‐fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75‐0.94) with no difference in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.92‐1.03) and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Intensive versus standard therapy reduced the risk of retinopathy (HR 0.85; 0.78‐0.93), nephropathy (HR 0.71; 0.58‐0.87) and composite microvascular outcomes (HR 0.88; 0.77‐1.00). Meta‐regression analyses showed modest evidence of inverse linear relationships between HbA1c reduction and the outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events, non‐fatal MI, stroke and retinopathy, but these were not statistically significant. Conclusions: In people with T2D, intensive glucose control was associated with a reduced risk of non‐fatal MI and several microvascular outcomes, particularly retinopathy and nephropathy. The lack of an effect of intensive glucose‐lowering on most macrovascular outcomes calls for a more comprehensive approach to managing cardiovascular risk factors alongside glycaemic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Existing data on the association between blood pressure levels and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) are inconsistent. The optimal blood pressure targets for patients with HF remain uncertain. This study sought to assess the associations between blood pressure (systolic [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) levels and adverse cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes in patients with HF. Methods and results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to 5 May 2023. The outcomes of interest included adverse cardiovascular events and all‐cause mortality. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Forty‐three unique observational cohort studies, comprising 120 643 participants with HF, were included. The pooled RRs (95% CIs) for SBP thresholds of ≥140 mmHg versus <140 mmHg were 0.92 (0.83–1.01) for all‐cause mortality, 0.83 (0.67–1.04) for CVD death, and 0.98 (0.80–1.21) for HF hospitalization. The pooled RR (95% CI) for SBP thresholds of ≥160 mmHg versus <160 mmHg and all‐cause mortality was 0.67 (0.62–0.74). SBP levels below <130, <120, and <110 mmHg were each associated with an increased risk of various cardiovascular endpoints and all‐cause mortality. The pooled RR (95% CI) for DBP thresholds of ≥80 mmHg versus <80 mmHg and all‐cause mortality was 0.86 (0.67–1.10). A 10 mmHg increase in SBP or DBP was associated with a reduction in all‐cause mortality and other cardiovascular endpoints. Conclusions: The findings suggest that lower and normal baseline SBP levels (<130, <120, and <110 mmHg) may be associated with future risk of worse outcomes in patients with HF. Optimal baseline blood pressure levels for these patients may lie within the range of ≥140 mmHg for SBP. In the absence of observational studies with repeated blood pressure measurements or definitive trials evaluating optimal blood pressure targets, individualized blood pressure targets based on patients' unique circumstances are warranted in HF management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of newer glucose‐lowering agents [sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT‐2is), glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs), and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors (DPP‐4is)] in type 2 diabetes (T2D), we aimed to determine the macrovascular and microvascular outcomes of these agents and clarify the relationships between glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction and risk of these outcomes. Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library until September 2023. Study‐specific hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled, and meta‐regression was used to assess the relationships between outcomes and between trial arm HbA1c reductions. Results: Twenty unique CVOTs (six SGLT‐2is, nine GLP‐1RAs, five DPP‐4is), based on 169 513 participants with T2D, were eligible. Comparing SGLT‐2is, GLP‐1RAs and DPP‐4is with placebo, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) for 3‐point major adverse cardiovascular events were 0.88 (0.82‐0.94), 0.85 (0.79‐0.92) and 1.00 (0.94‐1.06), respectively. SGLT‐2is and GLP‐1RAs consistently reduced the risk of several macrovascular and microvascular complications, particularly kidney events. DPP‐4is showed no macrovascular benefits. There was potential evidence of an inverse linear relationship between HbA1c reduction and 3‐point major adverse cardiovascular event risk (estimated risk per 1% reduction in HbA1c: 0.84, 95% CI 0.67‐1.06; p =.14; R2 = 14.2%), which was driven by the component of non‐fatal stroke (R2 = 100.0%; p =.094). There were non‐significant inverse linear relationships between HbA1c reduction and the risk of several vascular outcomes. Conclusions: SGLT‐2is and GLP‐1RAs showed consistent risk reductions in macrovascular and microvascular outcomes. The vascular benefits of SGLT‐2is and GLP‐1RAs in patients with T2D extend beyond mere glycaemic control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Despite global recommendations for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment to maintain optimal glycaemic targets, a significant proportion of people remain in suboptimal glycaemic control. Our objective was to investigate the impact of intensification delay after basal insulin (BI) initiation on long‐term complications in people with suboptimal glycaemia. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiated on BI. Those with suboptimal glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin ≥7% or ≥53 mmol/mol) within 12 months of BI initiation were divided into early (treatment intensified within 5 years), or late (≥5 years) intensification groups. We estimated the age‐stratified risks of micro‐ and macrovascular complications among these groups compared with those with optimal glycaemia (glycated haemoglobin <7%). Results: Of the 13 916 people with suboptimal glycaemia, 52.5% (n = 7304) did not receive any treatment intensification. In those aged <65 years, compared with the optimal glycaemia group late intensification was associated with a 56% higher risk of macrovascular complications (adjusted hazard ratio 1.56; 95% confidence intervals 1.08, 2.26). In elderly people (≥65 years), late intensification was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular‐related death (1.62; 1.03, 2.54) and a lower risk of microvascular complications (0.26; 0.08, 0.83). Conclusions: Those who had late intensification were at an increased risk of cardiovascular death if they were ≥65 years and an increased risk of macrovascular complications if they were <65 years. These findings highlight the critical need for earlier intensification of treatment and adopting personalized treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Foot ulcers and amputations are common conditions in people with diabetes and can considerably impact quality of life, necessitate a lengthy hospital stay and increase mortality. Preventative foot care and examination can prevent or delay ulceration, and individuals may seek information from publicly available social media resources such as YouTube. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the educational quality and reliability of publicly available YouTube videos on diabetes foot examinations. Method: A YouTube search for "diabetic foot examination" was conducted, and the first 100 relevant English videos focused on examining the diabetic foot were included for evaluation. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) standards were used to measure video reliability. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and the Diabetes UK Annual Foot Check (DUK‐C) checklist were used to assess video educational quality. Differences in JAMA, GQS, and DUK‐C ratings were analysed after videos were sorted by topic and source. Results: The mean number of views per video was 101,311.9 ± 348,383.6, and the mean video power index was 41.6 ± 170.0. The most common upload source was from physicians (28%) and, the most popular material category was diabetes foot examination (58 videos). In terms of video reliability, 36% of videos scored 0. According to the GQS standards, only 5% of the videos are of excellent quality, while 34% are of poor quality, with 24 videos scoring between 0 and 1 on the DUK‐C scale. Conclusion: While foot care examination videos have a substantial audience, the majority are considered low in quality and reliability. Videos on comprehensive diabetic foot examination should be accessed on reputable sources that guarantee standardisations of video quality and take into account the simplification of information transmission in order to reach lay audiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the initial combination therapy versus a stepwise approach in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and through search of bibliographies to January 2022. Study‐specific risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: Eight articles including four unique RCTs (n = 5527 participants) and one observational cohort study (n = 200) that compared initial combination therapy versus stepwise therapy were included. The RR for myocardial infarction comparing initial combination therapy versus stepwise therapy was 1.21 (95% CI 0.74‐2.00). Initial combination therapy reduced levels of fasting plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin: mean differences −0.97 mmol/L (95% CI −1.41, −0.53) and −24.92 mmol/mol (95% CI −25.67, −24.27), respectively. Initial combination therapy versus stepwise therapy reduced lipid levels, blood pressure and intima media thickness, with no differences in body composition variables, neuropathy, retinopathy or adverse events. Single‐study results showed that initial combination therapy reduced creatinine levels and urine albumin excretion rate. The quality of the evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Conclusions: Except for improving cardiometabolic and glycaemic variables, a limited number of studies characterized by small sample sizes show that initial combination therapy for newly diagnosed T2D may be similar in efficacy and safety to stepwise therapy with respect to cardio‐renal outcomes. There is a lack of sufficient evidence to recommend initial combination therapy with glucose‐lowering agents in newly diagnosed T2D with the aim of preventing cardio‐renal outcomes. Definitive RCTs are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this systematic review is to explore the attitudes of older adults (≥65 years old) and their carers towards de‐prescribing. Methods: We identified relevant studies from three databases; MEDLINE, CINAHL and Web of Science. Two reviewers (MS, SS) independently extracted data from each selected study using a standardised self‐developed data extraction form. Main findings of the studies were summarised descriptively. Results: A total of 35 studies were included in the review. Of them, 19 were questionnaire studies, 11 semi‐structured interviews, 4 focus groups and 1 study used the nominal group technique approach. Most older adults and their carers were willing to have medication de‐prescribed if told to do so by a healthcare professional (HCP). Other factors that increased willingness to de‐prescribing included; trust in the HCP, side effects and inconvenience from medications as well as the prospect of follow‐up and monitoring during de‐prescribing. In contrast, perceived effectiveness, unawareness of lack of benefit, negative expectations of ageing and fear were factors preventing de‐prescribing. Conclusion: De‐prescribing is an important concept in older people given the harm associated with polypharmacy in this age group. Overall, older adults and their carers are willing to have medication de‐prescribed if facilitated by their HCP. However, there remain a few barriers to de‐prescribing which may need to be addressed in certain patients, through discussions between older adults/their carers and a HCP, to allow de‐prescribing to be more effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It is uncertain if the combination of sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2‐Is) and renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system inhibitors (RAAS‐Is) provides better cardio‐renal clinical outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with SGLT2‐Is alone. Using a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we evaluated the efficacy and safety with respect to cardio‐renal outcomes of the combination of SGLT2 and RAAS inhibitors vs SGLT2‐Is in patients with T2DM. Methods: Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and search of bibliographies to May 2021. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each study. Study‐specific risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: Nine articles comprising 8 RCT evaluations (n = 34,551 participants) that compared SGLT2‐Is with placebo in patients with T2DM against a background of standard care and reported subgroup results for those treated with or without RAAS‐Is at baseline were included. No RCT specifically investigated the combination of SGLT2 and RAAS inhibitors compared with SGLT2‐Is alone. The RRs (95% CIs) for composite cardiovascular outcome and composite CVD death/heart failure hospitalization comparing SGLT2‐Is vs placebo in patients on RAAS‐Is were 0.93 (0.85–1.01) and 0.88 (0.76–1.02), respectively. The corresponding estimates for patients not on RAAS‐Is were 0.78 (0.65–0.93) and 0.73 (0.65–0.82), respectively. There was no evidence of interactions between RAAS‐I status and the effects of SGLT2‐Is for both outcomes. Single study results showed that SGLT2‐Is vs placebo reduced the risk of composite kidney outcome and cardiovascular death in patients with RAAS inhibition. The effect of SGLT2 inhibition vs placebo on kidney parameters, genital infections, volume depletion, hyperkalaemia, hypokalaemia, hypoglycaemia and other adverse events was similar in patients with or without RAAS inhibition. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Conclusions: Aggregate published data suggest that the combination of SGLT2 and RAAS inhibitors in the treatment of patients with T2DM may be similar in efficacy and safety if not superior to SGLT2‐Is alone. Head‐to‐head comparisons of the two interventions are warranted to inform T2DM management. The use of SGLT2 inhibition as a first‐line therapy in T2DM or its early use in the prevention of renal deterioration and cardiovascular complications in addition to its glycaemic control deserves further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To investigate factors associated with delays in receiving glucose‐lowering therapy in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and explore the preferential order and time of intensifications. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort study including 120 409 adults with T2DM initiating first‐ to fourth‐line glucose‐lowering therapy in primary care between 2000 and 2018, using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics, Office of National Statistics death registration, and 2007 Index of Multiple Deprivation data. Associations were investigated using time‐to‐event analysis. Results: The longest delays to prescription of first‐line therapy were observed in older patients, of black or other ethnicities, and with multimorbidity. People from the most deprived areas received earlier first‐line treatment than those from the least deprived areas. The majority were treated with metformin (82.4%) as the first‐line prescription, sulphonylurea (50.4%) as second‐line, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor (27.7%) as third‐line, and insulin (28.0%) as fourth‐line. In the past 5 years, there was an increase in prescriptions of dipeptidyl peptidase‐4‐inhibitor and sodium‐glucose transport protein‐2 inhibitor. The median time was 0.5 years for first‐line prescription, 4.1 for second‐line, 4.6 for third‐line and 4.7 for fourth‐line. After T2DM diagnosis, 25% of patients developed cardiovascular disease and non‐cardiovascular disease complications within a median time of 12‐14 years, and received intensification 5‐6 years later. Conclusions: Within the complex challenges of managing blood glucose levels and risk of additional comorbidities, future health care research and guidelines should focus on overcoming therapeutic inertia particularly at an earlier stage for older patients, from ethnic minorities and with multimorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The primary aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a model integrating diabetes services across primary, secondary and community care (Transformation model). The secondary aim was to understand whether changes resulted from the model. Methods: The model was implemented In Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland (UK) across three clinical commissioning groups, the acute trust and accompanying stakeholders. One clinical commissioning group (Leicester City) implemented the entire model and was the primary evaluation population. A quasi‐experimental interrupted time series design was employed. The primary outcome was number of Type 2 diabetes‐related bed‐days per 1000 patients. Results: In the primary population, the mean number of Type 2 diabetes‐related bed‐days per 1000 patients was increasing before model implementation by 0.33/month (95% confidence interval: −0.07, 0.72), whereas it was decreasing after implementation by a mean value of −0.14/month (−0.33, 0.06); a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04). Secondary analyses showed: nationally, there was no significant change between the pre‐ and post‐periods so it is unlikely that large secular change drove the improvement; the other two Leicestershire clinical commissioning groups saw improvement or stability; underlying processes worked as hypothesised overall; diabetes biomedical markers deteriorated in the primary care population suggesting a change in case‐mix due to moving some patients out of secondary care. Conclusions: Given that the initial aim was to shift services from secondary to primary care without causing harm, an improvement is better than expected. This observational evaluation cannot show conclusively that improvements were due to the Transformation model, but secondary analyses support this. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obesity accompanied by excess ectopic fat storage has been postulated as a risk factor for severe disease in people with SARS‐CoV‐2 through the stimulation of inflammation, functional immunologic deficit and a pro‐thrombotic disseminated intravascular coagulation with associated high rates of venous thromboembolism. Methods: Observational studies in COVID‐19 patients reporting data on raised body mass index at admission and associated clinical outcomes were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 16 May 2020. Mean differences and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were aggregated using random effects models. Results: Eight retrospective cohort studies and one cohort prospective cohort study with data on of 4,920 patients with COVID‐19 were eligible. Comparing BMI ≥ 25 vs <25 kg/m2, the RRs (95% CIs) of severe illness and mortality were 2.35 (1.43‐3.86) and 3.52 (1.32‐9.42), respectively. In a pooled analysis of three studies, the RR (95% CI) of severe illness comparing BMI > 35 vs <25 kg/m2 was 7.04 (2.72‐18.20). High levels of statistical heterogeneity were partly explained by age; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was associated with an increased risk of severe illness in older age groups (≥60 years), whereas the association was weaker in younger age groups (<60 years). Conclusions: Excess adiposity is a risk factor for severe disease and mortality in people with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. This was particularly pronounced in people 60 and older. The increased risk of worse outcomes from SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in people with excess adiposity should be taken into account when considering individual and population risks and when deciding on which groups to target for public health messaging on prevention and detection measures. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020179783. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To compare the effectiveness and safety of gliclazide modified release (MR) to sitagliptin as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) treatments in a real‐world patient population. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study used records from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. The cohort consisted of adult patients with T2D newly treated with either gliclazide MR or sitagliptin as second‐line treatment added to metformin and with a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level of ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol). Patients were 1:1 matched using high‐dimensional propensity score matching and followed to determine the time taken to reach an HbA1c <7.0%. Secondary outcomes included time to HbA1c ≤6.5% (48 mmol/mol), time to ≥1% (11 mmol/mol) HbA1c reduction from baseline, treatment persistence and durability, and hypoglycaemic events. Results: Among the 1986 patients included, those on gliclazide MR more likely achieved an HbA1c <7.0% [hazard ratio (HR): 1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15‐1.57], HbA1c ≤6.5% (HR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.19‐1.92) or had an HbA1c reduction ≥1% from baseline (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.00‐1.24) compared with patients on sitagliptin. Durability (log‐rank P =.135) and persistence (P =.119) were similar between the two groups. Hypoglycaemic events were uncommon (23 total severe and non‐severe events; incidence rate, 3.7 per 1000 patient years), with 4.7 and 2.6 events per 1000 patient years with gliclazide MR and sitagliptin treatment, respectively. Conclusions: In this real‐world study, second‐line gliclazide MR was more effective than sitagliptin in reducing HbA1c, with similar durability and persistence and low rates of hypoglycaemic events, in individuals with T2D on metformin treatment and HbA1c above the target of 7.0%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2 or COVID‐19) has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization and sent all countries scrambling to review emergency healthcare provisions. There is global evidence of each nation struggling to effectively manage the number of people being diagnosed with the virus. These are testing times which have not been experienced in recent generations and there are a number of insecurities regarding the management of people with COVID‐19 and cardiometabolic diseases. This review highlights the current concerns related to COVID‐19 and provides advice in terms of the therapeutic uncertainty and potential adverse harms associated with therapy when managing people, particularly those with cardiometabolic diseases, who have contracted or are at increased risk of contracting COVID‐19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess deintensification approaches and rates and evaluate the harm and benefits of deintensification with antidiabetic medication and other therapies among older people (≥ 65 years) with type 2 diabetes with or without cardiometabolic conditions. Methods: We identified relevant studies in a literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases to 30 October 2018. Data were extracted on baseline characteristics, details on deintensification and outcomes, and was synthesized using a narrative approach. Results: Ten studies (observational cohorts and interventional studies) with data on 26 558 patients with comorbidities were eligible. Deintensification approaches included complete withdrawal, discontinuation, reducing dosage, conversion, or substitution of at least one medication, but the majority of studies were based on complete withdrawal or discontinuation of antihyperglycaemic medication. Rates of deintensification approaches ranged from 13.4%–75%. The majority of studies reported no deterioration in HbA1c levels, hypoglycaemic episodes, falls or hospitalizations on deintensification. On adverse events and mortality, no significant differences were observed among the comparison groups in the majority of studies. Conclusion: Available but limited evidence suggests that the benefits of deintensification outweigh the harm in older people with type 2 diabetes with or without comorbidities. Given the heterogeneity of patients with diabetes, further research is warranted on which deintensification approaches are appropriate and beneficial for each specific patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To conduct a systematic review and meta‐analysis of published observational evidence to assess the difference in the prevalence and progression of diabetic nephropathy, and the development of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) in people from three different ethnic groups with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Materials and methods: Relevant studies were identified in a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists of relevant studies published up to May 2018. We decided a priori that there were no differences in the prevalence and progression of diabetic nephropathy, and the development of ESRD in the three ethnicities with T2DM. Pooled relative risks of microalbuminuria by ethnicity were estimated by fitting three random effects meta‐analyses models. A narrative synthesis of the nephropathy progression in the studies was carried out. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018107350). Results: Thirty‐two studies with data on 153 827 unique participants were eligible for inclusion in the review. The pooled prevalence ratio of microalbuminuria in South Asian compared with white European participants was 1.14 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99, 1.32; P = 0.065), while for African Caribbean vs South Asian participants the pooled prevalence ratio was 1.08 (95% CI 0.93, 1.24; P = 0.327). Results for renal decline were inconsistent, with preponderance towards a high rate of disease progression in South Asian compared with white participants. The estimated pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) for ESRD was significantly higher in African Caribbean vs white European participants: 2.75 (95% CI 2.01, 3.48; P < 0.001). Conclusion: The results of this review did not show a significant link between ethnicity (South Asian, white European and African Caribbean) and the prevalence of microalbuminuria; however, the IRR for ESRD in African Caribbean compared with white European participants was significantly higher. Further research is needed to explore the potential non‐albuminuric pathways of progression to ESRD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Hypoglycaemia is associated with increased cardiovascular risk among individuals with diabetes mellitus. It has been hypothesized that hypoglycaemia may trigger autonomic changes leading to increased cardiac arrhythmia risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to explore this association. Materials and methods: Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched from inception to October 10, 2017. We included studies of adults with diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) that compared acute electrocardiogram (ECG) changes during episodes of hypoglycaemia and euglycaemia. Results: Our search resulted in 4625 citations, among which 20 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Finally, 12 studies were included in the descriptive analysis and 15 in the meta‐analysis. Overall hypoglycaemia was associated with a reduction in heart rate variability and an increase in arrhythmia occurrence. QTc interval length was more significantly prolonged during hypoglycaemia compared to euglycaemia (pooled mean difference [95% confidence intervals] [0.64 (0.27‐1.01], P = ·001). Subgroup analysis based on diabetes type showed that QTc prolongation occurred in individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes; however, the change between euglycaemia reached statistical significance only among individuals with Type 1 diabetes. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hypoglycaemia results in ECG alterations that are associated with increased risk of cardiac arrhythmia, which is associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality. More clinical studies are needed to determine the cardiac risks of hypoglycaemia in individuals with diabetes, especially in Type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the authors' views about whether sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors should be used as a first-line oral therapy for type 2 diabetes patients, and it mentions the individualization of therapies to manage hyperglycaemia. Metformin therapy for diabetics is addressed, along with information obtained from the British UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Microvascular and macrovascular complications from diabetes are assessed.

Aims Methods Results Conclusions Health education is integral to cardiometabolic disease (CMD) management. This study aimed to assess whether and how education preferences have changed over time, and whether trends differ by sociodemographic characteristics (education status, age, ethnicity, and sex).A cross‐sectional questionnaire was deployed across five counties in the East Midlands, UK between 2017 and 2022 to adults with CMD (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease or cerebrovascular disease). Respondent demographic data were collected alongside health education preferences. Statistical analyses ascertained whether demographic characteristics influenced preferences. The distribution of preferences over time was charted to identify trends.A total of 4301 eligible responses were collected. Face‐to‐face one‐to‐one education was preferred (first choice for 75.1% of participants) but popularity waned over the five‐year period. Trends were similar amongst demographic groups. Online education showed a U‐shaped trend: In 2017, 44% of respondents ranked it as acceptable, peaking at 53% in 2019, but declining again, to below base line, 43%, by 2022. This modality was more popular with participants aged younger than 65 years, but popularity in people older than 65 years increased over the study period. The popularity of printed information also declined over time across all demographic groups except those of South Asian ethnicity, for whom it remained static.The overwhelming preference for face‐to‐face one‐to‐one health education from a doctor or nurse highlights the importance of preserving access to this modality, even in the face of current NHS pressures and trends towards digitalisation. Trends are changing, and should continue to be monitored, including between different sociodemographic groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]