1. Patient Referral and Acceptance of Maxillomandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
- Author
-
Rodin J, Fiorella M, Crippen M, Best K, Taub D, Champion A, Boon M, and Huntley C
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Adult, Patient Acceptance of Health Care statistics & numerical data, Patient Acceptance of Health Care psychology, Endoscopy methods, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Surveys and Questionnaires, Aged, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive surgery, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive therapy, Mandibular Advancement methods, Referral and Consultation statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Objective: Maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) is an effective surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, it is unclear how many patients who are referred for MMA actually undergo surgery. This study aims to determine follow-up rates for patients referred for MMA and the reasons behind their choices., Methods: Via retrospective review, we assessed consecutive patients with OSA intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) who underwent drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) between 2018 and 2020 at our institution. Patients recommended for MMA based on DISE and other findings were included. Patients were then contacted and administered an IRB-approved survey in present time., Results: One hundred and fifty nine patients were referred to oral maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) for MMA consult. Seventy seven patients (48%) followed up with OMFS and 29 (18%) underwent MMA. Sixty two (40%) patients resumed CPAP. Fifty eight patients (36.5%) were lost to follow up. Seventy three patients (46%) completed our survey. Of those patients, 37 (51%) followed up with OMFS and 17 (23%) underwent MMA. Patients who did not follow up with OMFS cited the invasiveness of the surgery (39%), recovery time (17%), or both (31%) as reasons. Those who pursued consultation cited inability to tolerate CPAP (73%), not being a candidate for inspire (14%), and desire to learn about alternative treatments (14%) as reasons. Of those who did not undergo MMA, 28.6% are not using OSA treatment., Conclusion: Less than half of patients referred for MMA followed up, and less than half of those patients underwent MMA. Most patients cited concerns about the invasiveness of the surgery and recovery process., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:2964-2969, 2024., (© 2023 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF