Search

Gait quality is of significant interest in studies investigating interventions for individuals with gait pathology. A primary challenge in gait analysis is selecting an appropriate metric which adequately reflects aberrant deviations and provides an assessment of gait quality in individuals with gait pathology. Metrics vary in definition of gait quality, and there is lack of consensus on an objective outcome measure for assessing gait; while three-dimensional gait analysis is the gold standard, metrics operationalizable in the form of wearable sensors would provide important information to clinicians and researchers without requiring a laboratory. In this study, we investigated and compared the ability of four metrics to detect aberrant gait through systematically applied joint constraint: Prosthetic Observational Gait Score (POGS), Impulse Asymmetry, Lateral Sway, and Gait Deviation Index (GDI). We analyze these metrics to understand their sensitivity and ability to detect systematic perturbed gait with an eye toward future operationalization in the form of a wearable sensor suite. We systematically applied four unilateral lower limb joint constraint conditions to nine able-bodied participants walking at three speeds creating four distinct gait patterns with variations from the baseline. Notably, POGS and GDI together distinguished five of six joint constraint comparisons, with each metric able to distinguish four joint constraint comparisons. Lateral Sway distinguished three joint constraint conditions and two speed conditions, while Impulse Asymmetry distinguished three constraint conditions. No single metric distinguished every condition. A single metric may be adequate for assessing specific gait features; however, multiple metrics are recommended for comprehensive assessment of pathological gait. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Indonesian dairy sector remains highly regulated, in spite of trade and investment policy reforms elsewhere in the economy. The regulations, aimed mainly at fostering development of local industry, include an import ratio requirement (BUSEP), import tariffs; an import licensing scheme, and restrictions on investment in milk processing The paper shows that the current policy mix has resulted in a significant increase in numbers of dairy cattle and dairy farmers, and in fresh milk and end-product output. However, this policy mix imposes costs. The analysis indicates that the economy, and in particular domestic consumers, would gain if dairy trade and investment restrictions were lessened. The gradual movement towards a more deregulated dairy sector is a necessary condition for improved efficiency and a strengthening of Indonesia's competitive position in the world dairy market. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]