Search

To date in the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a decrease in patients accessing emergency health services, (EHS) but research has been conducted in areas with a very high incidence of COVID-19. In an area with a low COVID-19 incidence, we estimate changes in EHS use.We compared EHS encounters in British Columbia from March 15 (the date of school and business closures) to May 15, 2020, when compared to the same period in 2019. We categorized EHS encounters into 18 presenting complaints and prespecified critical care complaints including major trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We analyzed by descriptive methods.Comparing 2019 to 2020, total EHS encounters decreased from 83,925 (incidence rate 834 per 100,000 person-months) to 71,611 (incidence rate 701 per 100,000 person-months) for a decrease of 133 per 100,000 person-months (95% CI 126-141). The top 18 codes had a significant decrease in every category except respiratory and anxiety. Encounters for critically ill patients decreased significantly overall from 3019 to 2753 (incidence rate difference 3.1 per 100,000 person-months, 95% CI 1.6-4.5), including stroke, trauma, and STEMI, but the incidence of OHCA appeared stable.In a single province with a low incidence of COVID-19, there was a 15% reduction in overall EHS use and a 9% reduction in critical illness. EHS planners will need to match patient need with available resources.RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Jusqu’à présent dans la pandémie de Covid-19, il y a eu une diminution du nombre de patients ayant accès aux services de santé d'urgence, mais des recherches ont été menées dans des zones à très forte incidence de Covid-19. Dans une zone à faible incidence de Covid-19, nous estimons les changements dans l'utilisation des services de santé d’urgence. MéTHODES: Nous avons comparé les cas des services de santé d’urgence en Colombie-Britannique du 15 mars (date de fermeture des écoles et des entreprises) au 15 mai 2020, par rapport à la même période en 2019. Nous avons classé les cas des services de santé d’urgence en 18 plaintes de présentation et des plaintes de soins intensifs pré-spécifiées, y compris un traumatisme majeur, un arrêt cardiaque, un accident vasculaire cérébral et un infarctus du myocarde avec élévation du segment ST. Nous avons analysé par des méthodes descriptives. RéSULTATS : En comparant 2019 à 2020, le nombre total des cas des services de santé d’urgence est passé de 83 925 (taux d'incidence de 834 pour 100 000 personnes-mois) à 71 611 (taux d'incidence de 701 pour 100 000 personnes-mois) pour une diminution de 133 pour 100 000 personnes-mois (IC à 95 % 126 à 141). Les 18 codes principaux ont connu une diminution significative dans toutes les catégories, sauf respiratoire et anxiété. Les cas chez les patients gravement malades ont globalement diminué de manière significative de 3 019 à 2 753 (différence de taux d'incidence de 3,1 pour 100 000 personnes-mois, IC à 95 % de 1,6 à 4,5), y compris les accidents vasculaires cérébraux, les traumatismes et les STEMI, mais l'incidence des arrêts cardiaque hors hôpital semble stable. CONCLUSIONS: Dans une seule province avec une faible incidence de Covid-19, il y a eu une réduction de 15 % de l'utilisation globale des services de santé d’urgence et une réduction de 9 % des maladies graves. Les organisateurs des services de santé d’urgence devront faire correspondre les besoins des patients avec les ressources disponibles.

BackgroundEmergency department (ED) patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF) with underlying occult condition such as sepsis or heart failure, and who are managed with rate or rhythm control, have poor prognoses. Such conditions may not be easy to identify early in the ED evaluation when critical treatment decisions are made. We sought to develop a simple decision aid to quickly identify undifferentiated ED AFF patients who are at high risk of acute underlying illness.MethodsWe collected consecutive ED patients with electrocardiogram-proven AFF over a 1-year period and performed a chart review to ascertain demographics, comorbidities, and investigations. The primary outcome was having an acute underlying illness according to prespecified criteria. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with the primary outcome, and developed criteria to identify those with an underlying illness at presentation.ResultsOf 1,083 consecutive undifferentiated ED AFF patients, 400 (36.9%) had an acute underlying illness; they were older with more comorbidities. Modeling demonstrated that three predictors (ambulance arrival; chief complaint of chest pain, dyspnea, or weakness; CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than 2) identified 93% of patients with acute underlying illness (95% confidence interval [CI], 91–96%) with 54% (95% CI, 50–58%) specificity. The decision aid missed 28 patients; (7.0%) simple blood tests and chest radiography identified all within an hour of presentation.ConclusionsIn ED patients with undifferentiated AFF, this simple predictive model rapidly differentiates patients at risk of acute underlying illness, who will likely merit investigations before AFF-specific therapy.

The primary purpose of this statement is to improve neuroprognostication after devastating brain injury (DBI), with a secondary benefit of potential organ and tissue donation.

For a French translation of the executive summary, please see the Supplementary Material at DOI: 10.1017/cem.2017.429

The evaluation of the cervical spine in the emergency department is a common and often challenging task. We report the case of a 70-year-old female who presented intoxicated with evidence of a recent fall. A 64-slice computed tomographic (CT) scan with sagittal and coronal reconstructions revealed no acute injury. The patient was reexamined when alert and had persistent neck pain. Flexionextension static views revealed severe subluxation of C5 on C6 with jumped facets, and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging confirmed significant ligamentous injury. The evidence available suggests that although CT with reconstruction is highly sensitive for clinically significant cervical injury, the possibility of severe injury remains.

Despite successful large-scale immunization programs in North America, there remains a significant population without active immunity to tetanus toxins because immunizations have been refused or delayed, and because of waning immunity. We report the case of a 7-year-old boy who presented to the emergency department with a chin laceration and a 7-day history of repeated falls of increasing frequency. We found this case to be associated with dysphagia and facial spasm, and we learned that the child had dropped a brick on his foot 2 weeks previously. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with tetanus and treated accordingly. Tetanus presentations to emergency departments may vary from mild muscular rigidity to advanced respiratory failure and thus clinicians should consider the diagnosis in various clinical presentations, especially in areas remote from advanced supportive care.

Introduction: Survival for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is typically 8-12%. Recent evidence has shown that public access automatic external defibrillators (AED) may improve survival. The objectives of this study were to determine whether AEDs improve rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), overall survival, and favourable neurological survival (FNS) in Canada. Methods: The BC Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium prospectively collected detailed prehospital and hospital data on consecutive non-traumatic OHCAs from 2011-2015 within BC’s four metropolitan areas. We included all EMS-treated adult patients. Data were collected in accordance with recognized Utstein criteria. We described frequencies with counts, means and medians where appropriate, and the Z-test was used to compare population proportions. Results: We examined 7577 OHCAs from 2011-2015. AEDs were deployed on 223 patients in this period (mean age 60.4 yrs [95% CI 45.7-75.1] and 83.9% male; non-AED OHCAs mean age 66.2 yrs [48.4-83.8] and 67.3% male). Seventy seven percent of AED deployments occurred in public locations, 69.1% were witnessed by bystanders and CPR was initiated in 98.7% of these cases. Fifteen percent of non-AED OHCAs occurred in public locations, 38.3% were bystander witnessed, and 45.4% received bystander CPR. AEDs delivered shocks to 61.4% of patients, and EMS crews found an initial shockable rhythm upon scene arrival in 60.5% of AED deployments (22.9% for non-AED cases). AED OHCA patients had higher rates of ROSC at any time (67.2% vs 47.6%; difference of 19.6% [12.9-26.2 pConclusion: Automatic external defibrillators markedly improve rates of ROSC at any time, sustained ROSC at ED arrival, survival to hospital discharge, and FNS in Canada. Continued support for public access AED programs is essential to improve patient outcomes.

Introduction: H1-antihistamines are often used to treat allergic reactions, however, the influence of H1-antihistamines on progression to anaphylaxis remains unclear. Among patients initially presenting with allergic reactions, we investigated whether H1-antihistamines were associated with a lower proportion of patients progressing to anaphylaxis during observation. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at two urban EDs from 2007 to 2012. We included adult patients with allergy and excluded those who met criteria of anaphylaxis at first evaluation by medical professionals and/or received antihistamines before the evaluation. Primary outcomes of interest were the number of patients who developed anaphylaxis during observation at ED and/or transportation by EMS. Secondary outcomes were the number of biphasic reactions and severe anaphylaxis (defined as sBPResults: This study included 1717 patients with allergic reactions, of whom 1228 were treated with H1-antihistamines. In the H1-antihistamine group 1.0% and 0.2% developed anaphylaxis and severe anaphylaxis, respectively; in the non-H1-antihistamine group 2.6% and 0.6% developed anaphylaxis and severe anaphylaxis, respectively. There were no biphasic reactions (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 0.17%). Administration of H1-antihistamines was associated with a lower incidence of subsequent anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.53; NNT to benefit 49.1, 95% CI 41.6 to 83.3). There were no significant associations between H1-histamines administration and secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Among ED patient with allergic reactions, H1-antihistamine administration was associated with a lower likelihood of progression to anaphylaxis. These findings suggest that H1-antihistamines should be administered early in the care of patients with allergic reactions.

Introduction: Emergency medical services (EMS) have the opportunity to treat allergic reactions anaphylactic reactions rapidly. However, the rate of recognition and treatment is unknown. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at two urban emergency departments from 2007 to 2012 including adult patients with allergy and anaphylaxis, both of which were predefined by explicit criteria. The patients of interest were those attended by EMS and transported to hospital. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who met anaphylaxis criteria in the prehospital setting, but who did not have epinephrine administered. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who did not meet anaphylaxis criteria, yet had epinephrine administered. Results: Of 2819 overall patients, 491 (17.4%) arrived by EMS. The median age was 38 (IQR 27 to 49) and 60.9% were female. For the 151 (30.8%) patients with anaphylaxis, 55 received ephinephrine, (36.4%, 95% CI 27.4 to 47.4%). For the 340 (69.2%) patients without anaphylaxis, 28 received ephinephrine (8.2%, 95% CI 5.5 to 11.9%). Conclusion: For patients with anaphylaxis and allergic reactions who are managed by EMS, there may be a mismatch between illness severity and treatment.