Search

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated skin disease with a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Mild-to-moderate forms of the disease usually require long-term topical treatment, but prolonged use of corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues is limited by adverse effects. With further understanding of psoriasis pathogenesis, new molecules are emerging aiming to fulfil these clinical needs. Tapinarof, an aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulator, has completed a phase III study and demonstrated good efficacy results, even in long treatment courses, with a favourable safety profile. It additionally appears to have a promising remitting effect as patients presented with an average relapsing time of over 3 months. Roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor, also underwent a phase III study with significant lesion improvement and notable pruritus management, and with no reported side effects. Roflumilast was evaluated as an option for intertriginous areas with good outcomes in a small sample, but larger trials are required. The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway has been targeted in recent clinical investigations with promising options, currently with brepocitinib pending phase IIb results. Ongoing preclinical studies involving interleukin-2 inhibition, RNA modulators and amygdalin analogues may lead to forthcoming clinical trials. New topical drugs are successfully emerging and future research comparing them to classical options will dictate their clinical role in the treatment of psoriasis.

A 53-year-old woman was diagnosed with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) in 2008. Six courses of R-COP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) resulted in complete remission, but LPL/WM relapsed in 2015. After six courses of R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone), the M-peak disappeared, but the patient presented with muscle weakness and sensory disturbance in the lower extremities. No lesions were apparent in the brain parenchyma, but T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a signal-hyperintense area with contrast enhancement in the spinal cord at the C2-4 and Th2-3 levels, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination showed only a few mononuclear cells. In 2020, the patient started to require walking assistance, and MRI findings worsened. Neurologically, lower limb muscle strength was reduced (manual muscle test score 3), and sensations of touch and pain were about 30% of normal. Vibratory sensation was absent at the knees and medial malleoli, accompanied by dysuria due to neurogenic bladder. CSF cell count was 15/μl (all mononuclear cells). Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) was diagnosed and tirabrutinib was started. Within 2 months of treatment, lower extremity muscle strength had normalized and MRI findings had improved. Tirabrutinib may offer a promising therapeutic option for BNS.

The Janus kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF) and improved overall survival (OS) versus control therapy in the phase 3 COMFORT trials. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to examine the real-world impact of ruxolitinib on OS in patients with MF. The US Medicare Fee-for-Service claims database (parts A/B/D) was used to identify patients with ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims with an MF diagnosis (January 2010–December 2017). Eligible patients with MF were ≥ 65 years old (intermediate-1 or higher risk based on age). Patients were divided into 3 groups based on ruxolitinib approval status at diagnosis and ruxolitinib exposure: (1) preapproval, ruxolitinib-unexposed; (2) post-approval, ruxolitinib-unexposed; and (3) post-approval, ruxolitinib-exposed. In total, 1677 patients with MF were included (preapproval [all ruxolitinib-unexposed], n = 278; post-approval, n = 1399 [ruxolitinib-unexposed, n = 1127; ruxolitinib-exposed, n = 272]). Overall, median age was 78 years, and 39.8% were male. Among patients with valid death dates (preapproval, n = 119 [42.8%]; post-approval, ruxolitinib-unexposed, n = 382 [33.9%]; post-approval ruxolitinib-exposed, n = 54 [19.9%]), 1-year survival rates were 55.6%, 72.5%, and 82.3%, and median OS was 13.2 months, 44.4 months, and not reached, respectively. Risk of mortality was significantly lower post- versus preapproval regardless of exposure to ruxolitinib (ruxolitinib-unexposed: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; ruxolitinib-exposed: adjusted HR, 0.36; P P = 0.002). Findings from this study complement clinical data of ruxolitinib in MF by demonstrating a survival benefit in a real-world setting.

In the MYF2001 trial, treatment of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor-relapsed/refractory intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF) with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks demonstrated encouraging median overall survival of 29.9 months. To provide historical context, external real-world data (RWD) were collected from a study of 96 patients who had discontinued ruxolitinib and were subsequently treated with best available therapy (BAT) at Moffitt Cancer Center. A closely matched cohort was identified using the MYF2001 eligibility criteria, including patients with MF who had discontinued ruxolitinib due to lack or loss of response. Overall survival was measured from time of JAK inhibitor discontinuation to death or censored at last follow-up. To improve comparability, propensity score weighting approaches using average treatment effect for overlap population (ATO) and stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) were used for 10 critical baseline covariates. Fifty-seven patients treated with imetelstat 9.4 mg/kg from MYF2001 and 38 patients treated with BAT from RWD were analyzed with improved balanced baseline covariates after propensity score adjustment, showing significantly lower risk of death with imetelstat compared with BAT (hazard ratio: 0.35; p = 0.0019). With sIPTW, results were similar. Results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis. In conclusion, treatment with imetelstat was associated with longer overall survival compared to BAT (30 vs 12 months, respectively) in closely matched patients with MF after JAK inhibitor failure, warranting further evaluation of imetelstat in this poor-prognosis patient population.

Herein, a novel series of dual histone deacetylase (HDAC) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors were designed, synthesized and biologically evaluated based on previously reported pazopanib-based HDAC and VEGFR dual inhibitors. Most target compounds showed significant HDAC1, HDAC6 and VEGFR2 inhibition, which contributed to their potent antiproliferative activities against multiple cancer cell lines and significant antiangiogenic potencies in both human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) tube formation assays and rat thoracic aorta ring assays. Further HDAC selectivity evaluations indicated that hydroxamic acids 5 and 9e possessed HDAC isoform selectivity profiles similar to that of the approved HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid(SAHA), while hydrazide12 presented an HDAC isoform selectivity profilesimilar to that of the clinical HDAC inhibitor MS-275. The VEGFR inhibition profiles of 5, 9e and 12 were similar to that of the approved VEGFR inhibitor pazopanib. The intracellular target engagements of Compounds 5 and 12 were confirmed by western blot analysis. The metabolic stabilities of 5, 9e and 12 in mouse liver microsomes were inferior to that of pazopanib. These dual HDAC and VEGFR inhibitors provide lead compounds for further structural optimization to obtainpolypharmacological anticancer agents.

Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often elderly and have various comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases. Although these patients have extensive co-exposure to targeted therapy and cardiovascular drugs, the impact of this co-exposure on outcomes for patients with mRCC remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the association between the use of cardiovascular medication and survival of patients with mRCC. The study included 343 consecutive patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line. Clinical data obtained from the Renal Cell Carcinoma Information System (RENIS) clinical registry and hospital information systems were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the use of common medications, including antihypertensives (i.e., β-blockers [BBs], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics), acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin), statins, and proton pump inhibitors. The univariate Cox analysis evaluating the impact of the assessed comedications on patient survival revealed that only BBs were significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.533, p

Almonertinib is a novel third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It is mainly metabolized by CYP3A in vitro, and N-desmethylated almonertinib (HAS-719) is the major active metabolite in human plasma. In this study, we investigated the effects of CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole and CYP3A inducer rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of almonertinib and HAS-719 in 64 healthy volunteers. We found that when co-administered with itraconazole, the maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) and the plasma exposure (AUC(0–t)) of almonertinib were increased by 56.3% and 2.38-fold, respectively, whereas the C(max) and AUC(0–t) of HAS-719 were reduced by 86.8% and 71.8%, respectively. Co-administration with rifampicin reduced the C(max) and AUC(0–t) of almonertinib by 79.3% and 92.6%, but the AUC(0–t) of HAS-719 was unexpectedly decreased by 72.5%. In vitro assays showed that both almonertinib and HAS-719 were substrates of CYP3A and P-gp. Co-administration of rifampicin in Beagle dogs reduced the fecal recovery of almonertinib and HAS-719, and markedly increased the levels of metabolites derived from further metabolism of HAS-719, which was consistent with human plasma data, suggesting that although rifampicin was also a potent inducer of P-gp, the pharmacokinetic alternation of HAS-719 was mainly due to its further metabolism but not excretion changes. Moreover, we revealed that almonertinib was a moderately sensitive substrate of CYP3A in vivo. Special attention should be paid to the interaction between almonertinib and drugs or food affecting CYP3A activity in the clinical application of almonertinib.

This study aims to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients prescribed with nilotinib as a second-line therapy and explores the influential factors. A multicenter retrospective survey was conducted via face-to-face interviews based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. A total of 121 adult CML patients resistant to imatinib and used nilotinib for at least 3 months were enrolled. The influential features were assessed by multiple linear regression models. Patients had the mean age of 47.49 (SD = 13.67) years, dominated by middle-aged and male groups. The mean scores of functions ranged from 75 to 83, and those of symptoms were from 5 to 28, with the highest of fatigue (28.28), insomnia (22.87), and pain (21.07). The mean global health status/QoL score was 67.70 (SD = 16.80) with considerable financial difficulties (52.34 (SD = 32.15)). Male patients reported higher functional scores and fewer symptoms compared with female patients. All aspects of QoL became worse with increasing age. Besides age and gender, level of education, duration of nilotinib usage, and comorbidities were also significantly influential factors in many QoL domains. A predicted model for expected mean scores of QoL domains was built based on these factors. The CML patients treated with nilotinib had the above-moderate QoL scores, a light decrease of functional scores, great financial difficulties, and still experienced symptoms. Strategies and more therapeutic considerations to enhance QoL for CML patients targeted toward women, the old, low educational level, and long duration of nilotinib usage, and many comorbidities are needed in the setting.

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGFR and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-MET signaling pathways act synergistically to promote angiogenesis. Studies indicate VEGF inhibition leads to increased levels of phosphorylated c-MET, bypassing VEGF-mediated angiogenesis and leading to chemoresistance. We conducted a phase 1 clinical trial with 32 patients with refractory solid tumors to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of combinations of VEGF-targeting pazopanib and the putative c-MET inhibitor ARQ197 (tivantinib) at 5 dose levels (DLs). Patients either took pazopanib and tivantinib from treatment initiation (escalation phase) or pazopanib alone for 7 days, with paired tumor sampling, prior to starting combination treatment (expansion phase). Hypertension was the most common adverse event. No more than 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at any DL, so the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not determined; DL5 (800 mg pazopanib daily and 360 mg tivantinib BID) was used during the expansion phase. Twenty of 31 evaluable patients achieved stable disease lasting up to 22 cycles. Circulating VEGF, VEGFR2, HGF, and c-MET levels were assessed, and only VEGF levels increased. Tumor c-MET levels (total and phosphorylated) were determined in paired biopsies before and after 7 days of pazopanib treatment. Total intact c-MET decreased in 6 of 7 biopsy pairs, in contrast to previously reported c-MET elevation in response to VEGF inhibition. These results are discussed in the context of our previously reported analysis of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in these tumors. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10637-021-01138-x.

Background Pazopanib is active in refractory soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and significantly prolongs PFS. Prior studies of combinations of metronomic topotecan with pazopanib have indicated preclinical evidence of response in patients with sarcoma. Methods This prospective, single arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy of the combination of pazopanib with topotecan in patients with metastatic or unresectable non-adipocytic STS. Furthermore, it incorporated exploratory arms for osteosarcoma and liposarcoma. The primary endpoint was progression-free rate at 12 weeks in the non-adipocytic STS cohort. Results 57.5% of patients in the non-adipocytic STS cohort were progression free at 12 weeks, which did not meet the primary endpoint of the study (66%). The exploratory osteosarcoma cohort exceeded previously established phase II trial comparator data benchmark of 12% with a PFR at 12 weeks of 69.55%. Treatment with the combination of pazopanib and topotecan was accompanied by a grade 3 or 4 toxicities in most patients. Conclusions In this prospective trial in refractory metastatic or unresectable STS and osteosarcoma, the combination of pazopanib with topotecan did not meet its primary endpoint of progression-free rate at 12 weeks. The combination of pazopanib with topotecan was associated with a high degree of toxicity.

One-third of patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not achieve remission or low disease activity, or they have side effects from cDMARD and bDMARD. They will need a new treatment option such as the small molecule JAK inhibitors. In this systematic review, we evaluate the efficacy and safety data of the current jakinibs: tofacitinib, peficitinib, decernotinib, upadacitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib in patients in whom treatment with conventional or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARD and/or bDMARD) failed. We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of jakinibs for RA treatment using the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov databases with the terms: “rheumatoid arthritis” OR “arthritis rheumatoid” OR “RA” AND “inhibitor” OR “jak inhibitor” AND “clinical trial” OR “treatment” OR “therapy”. All jakinibs achieved good results in ACR 20, 50, 70 and with CRP-DAS28 for LDA and remission, upadacitinib showed better results compared to the others. In ESR-DAS28 for remission, tofacitinib achieved the best result. Regarding the safety of all jakinibs, peficitinib, baricitinib and filgotinib did not register deaths in their studies unlike tofacitinib that presented 11 deaths. Despite all benefits of jakinibs, the use in patients with severe liver and kidney disease should be avoided. Jakinibs in monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate can be considered a viable alternative in the treatment of moderate-to-severe RA. Even after failures with combination of cDMARDS and bDMARDS, jakinibs demonstrated efficacy.

Background Pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) involves the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. A cream formulation of ruxolitinib, a potent selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, was developed for topical delivery. Method Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from three double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies in patients with AD: a phase II study with ruxolitinib cream 0.15%, 0.5%, or 1.5% once daily or 1.5% twice daily (BID), and two phase III studies with 0.75% or 1.5% BID. Effects of baseline characteristics on pharmacokinetics were examined. Correlations were attempted between plasma concentrations and change in hematological parameters over time. Results Ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at steady-state (Css) increased with cream strength in a less-than-dose-proportional manner. In the phase III studies, overall mean (standard deviation [SD]) Css after ruxolitinib cream 0.75% and 1.5% BID (23.8 [35.0] and 35.7 [55.0] nM) were a fraction of the half-maximal inhibitory concentration for thrombopoietin-stimulated phosphorylated STAT3 inhibition (281 nM), a JAK/STAT signaling marker. Three covariates were identified for Css: dose, percent body surface area (%BSA) treated, and baseline Investigator’s Global Assessment score. Mean (SD) bioavailability of ruxolitinib cream 1.5% BID was 6.22% (7.66%). There were no correlations between Css and any hematological changes except for a transient increase in platelets at week 2. Conclusions Plasma ruxolitinib concentrations after treatment with topical ruxolitinib cream in patients with up to 20% BSA affected by AD are not expected to lead to systemic plasma concentrations that may be associated with adverse effects commonly associated with oral JAK inhibitors. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03011892; NCT03745638; NCT03745651. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40257-021-00610-x.

Background This open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluated the highly selective MET inhibitor tepotinib in systemic anticancer treatment (SACT)-naive Asian patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) with MET overexpression. Methods In Phase 2b, tepotinib was orally administered once daily (300, 500 or 1,000 mg) to Asian adults with aHCC. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs). Phase 2 randomised SACT-naive Asian adults with aHCC with MET overexpression to tepotinib (recommended Phase 2 dose [RP2D]) or sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was independently assessed time to progression (TTP). Results In Phase 1b (n = 27), no DLTs occurred; the RP2D was 500 mg. In Phase 2 (n = 90, 45 patients per arm), the primary endpoint was met: independently assessed TTP was significantly longer with tepotinib versus sorafenib (median 2.9 versus 1.4 months, HR = 0.42, 90% confidence interval: 0.26–0.70, P = 0.0043). Progression-free survival and objective response also favoured tepotinib. Treatment-related Grade ≥3 AE rates were 28.9% with tepotinib and 45.5% with sorafenib. Conclusions Tepotinib improved TTP versus sorafenib and was generally well tolerated in SACT-naive Asian patients with aHCC with MET overexpression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01988493.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is often utilized to downstage Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer prior to surgery. However, this approach is sometimes met with endocrine resistance mechanisms within the tumor. This trial examines the safety and efficacy of tamoxifen in combination with an mTORC1/2 inhibitor, TAK-228, in the neoadjuvant treatment of ER+ breast cancer. In this single-arm, open-label trial, pre- and post-menopausal women were enrolled to receive neoadjuvant tamoxifen (20 mg daily) with TAK-228 (30 mg weekly) for 16 weeks prior to surgery. Patient had tissue sampling at baseline, week 6, and week 16. The primary endpoint was change in Ki-67 from baseline to 6 weeks. The toxicity, change in tumor size, pathologic complete response rate, PEPI score, and baseline Oncotype Dx score were also assessed. Twenty-eight women were enrolled on the trial, and 25 completed the entire study course. The combination of tamoxifen and TAK-228 resulted in a significant reduction in Ki-67 from 18.3 to 15.2% (p = 0.0023). The drug was also found to be safe and tolerable. While nausea and hyperglycemia were common side effects, these were manageable. The tumor size also significantly decreased with the treatment, with a median decrease of 0.75 cm (p

This multicenter prospective phase 2 trial analyzed disease-free survival (DFS) in myelofibrosis patients receiving ruxolitinib for 6 months before transplantation. Seventy-six patients were recruited. Age-adjusted dynamic international prognostic scoring system was intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high in 27 (36%), 31 (41%), and 18 (24%) patients. All patients received ruxolitinib from inclusion to conditioning regimen (fludarabine-melphalan) or to progression. A donor was found in 64 patients: 18 HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD), 32 HLA-matched unrelated (UD10/10), and 14 HLA mismatched unrelated donor (UD9/10. Among 64 patients with a donor, 20 (31%) achieved a partial response before transplantation and 59 (92%) could be transplanted after ruxolitinib therapy (18/18 MSD, 30/21 UD10/10, 11/34 UD9/10), of whom 19 (32%) were splenectomized. Overall survival from inclusion was 68% at 12 months. One-year DFS after transplantation was 55%: 83%, 40%, and 34% after MSD, UD10/10 or UD9/10, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 66% and non-relapse-mortality was 42% at 12 months. Short course of ruxolitinib before transplantation is followed by a high rate of transplantation. With the platform used in this protocol, outcome was much better in patients transplanted with HLA-matched sibling donor as compared to unrelated donor.

SummaryBackground Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, targets activated, mutant forms of ALK and overcomes mechanisms of resistance to the ALK inhibitors crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Brigatinib is approved in multiple countries for treatment of patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, no dosage adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Methods An open-label, single-dose study was conducted to evaluate the PK of brigatinib (90 mg) in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate 2; n = 8) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 8). Plasma and urine were collected for the determination of plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma and urine PK parameters. Results Plasma protein binding of brigatinib was similar between patients with severe renal impairment (92 % bound) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (91 % bound). Unbound brigatinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) was approximately 92 % higher in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy volunteers with normal renal function. The renal clearance of brigatinib in patients with severe renal impairment was approximately 20 % of that observed in volunteers with normal renal function. Conclusions These findings support a brigatinib dosage reduction of approximately 50 % in patients with severe renal impairment.Trial registry: Not applicable.

Dysregulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling is common in both indolent and aggressive forms of malignant lymphoma, for which several targeted therapies have been developed. Copanlisib is a highly selective and potent intravenous pan-class I PI3K inhibitor that has demonstrated durable objective responses and a manageable safety profile in heavily pre-treated patients with indolent lymphomas. As a result, copanlisib monotherapy received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with relapsed follicular lymphoma who have received at least two systemic therapies, and breakthrough designation for patients with pre-treated relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma. Hyperglycemia and hypertension are among the most frequently reported adverse events with copanlisib monotherapy, and are infusion-related, transient, and manageable with standard therapies. Mild diarrhea is also a common adverse event with copanlisib monotherapy; there is no evidence of worsening severity of diarrhea, or serious gastrointestinal toxicities such as colitis or severe liver enzyme elevations, which have been reported with orally administered PI3K inhibitors. The intravenous route of administration and intermittent dosing schedule of copanlisib may support a favorable tolerability profile over continually administered oral alternatives. Ongoing studies of copanlisib in combination with rituximab and standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with relapsed indolent lymphoma have the potential to support the use of copanlisib in the second-line setting, providing a much-needed additional therapeutic option in this underserved patient population.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the backbone of treatment for chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients (CP-CML), have changed the long-term outcome of the disease. Nonetheless, over 20% of patients fail front-line therapy due to intolerance or resistance. A head-to-head comparison of dasatinib and nilotinib as second-line treatment outside of sponsored clinical trials has not been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 131 CP-CML patients who, after front-line imatinib failure, switched to a second-line therapy with nilotinib (59, 45%) or dasatinib (72, 55%). Median duration of second-line treatment was 33 months (range 2-100). The reason for switching therapy was resistance in 83.2% and intolerance in 16.8% of patients. The overall survival of the entire cohort at 7 years was 78.9%, while it was 72% and 85.6% for patients treated with dasatinib and nilotinib, respectively (p=0.287). With regard to efficacy after 12 months of treatment, 108 patients were evaluable for molecular response: 47% achieved a major molecular response and 18.2% a deep molecular response with dasatinib, compared to 38% and 16.2% with nilotinib (p=ns). We observed 35% of grade 3-4 adverse events, more frequently in the dasatinib group (47%) compared to the nilotinib group (22%), without affecting molecular responses. Our study suggests that, in the real-life setting, dasatinib and nilotinib used as second-line treatment in CP-CML are equally effective, with high molecular response rates and an acceptable tolerability.

Purpose Patients with heterozygous gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in STAT1 frequently exhibit chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC), immunodeficiency and autoimmune manifestations. Several treatment options including targeted therapies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are available for STAT1 GOF patients but modalities and outcomes are not well established. Herein, we aimed to unravel the effect of ruxolitinib as a bridge therapy in a patient with sporadic STAT1 T385M mutation to manage infections and other disease manifestations. Methods Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from the patient prior to, during ruxolitinib treatment and 6 months after HSCT. IFN-beta-induced STAT1 phosphorylation/dephosphorylation levels and PMA/ionomycin-stimulated intracellular IL-17A/IFN-gamma production in CD4(+) T cells were evaluated. Differentially expressed genes between healthy controls and the patient prior to, during ruxolitinib treatment and post-transplantation were investigated using Nanostring nCounter Profiling Panel. Results Ruxolitinib provided favorable responses by controlling candidiasis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia in the patient. Dysregulation in STAT1 phosphorylation kinetics improved with ruxolitinib treatment and was completely normalized after transplantation. T(H)17 deficiency persisted after ruxolitinib treatment, but normalized following HSCT. Consistent with the impairment in JAK/STAT signaling, multiple immune related pathways were found to be dysregulated in the patient. At baseline, genes related to type I IFN-related pathways, antigen processing, T-cell and B-cell functions were upregulated, while NK-cell function and cytotoxicity related genes were downregulated. Dysregulated gene expression was partially improved with ruxolitinib treatment and normalized after transplantation. Conclusion Our findings suggest that improved disease management and immune dysregulatory profile can be achieved with ruxolitinib treatment before transplantation and this would be beneficial to reduce the risk of adverse outcome of HSCT.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease characterised by vasculopathy, inflammation and fibrosis in multiple organs and occasionally coexists with rheumatic conditions, such as axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the successful use of tofacitinib in SSc and axial spondylarthritis (axSpa), as a novel therapeutic agent; however, further studies are needed to elucidate the role of JAK inhibition in the treatment of both conditions. In this paper, we report a case of a 58-year-old woman with diffuse SSc who developed axSpA. The patient had a 10-year history of SSc and was treated with tocilizumab before the onset of lower back pain. The diagnostic evaluation included MRI that demonstrated bone marrow oedema in the sacroiliac joints, the HLA-B27 was positive, and given the inflammatory features of her back pain, she was diagnosed with axSpa. The biologic agent was switched into etanercept with an improvement of the back pain; however, the patient had a relapse of her skin manifestations. Given the treatment failure, we aim to treat the 2 coexisting conditions concurrently with tofacitinib, which led to symptom improvement. This case report is noteworthy, given the rarity of the coexistence of both conditions and the therapeutic challenges faced by the clinician. The online database MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus where searched for articles published from inception to June 2020, using the terms "ankylosing spondylitis" AND "systemic sclerosis" OR "axial spondyloarthritis" AND "systemic sclerosis". Also, we searched the American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism annual meeting abstracts from 2015 to 2019 using the same terms. As a result, we found 9 similar case reports. 9 case reports of patients with both conditions were identified through a literature review and we highlighted the differences and similarities between them. Also, we emphasise on intracellular signalling inhibitors as novel therapeutic targets in treating both conditions. Tofacitinib might be a novel therapeutic agent in the management of SSc and axSpA.

Rationale Previous research suggests that sleep polysomnography and EEG endpoints can be used to assess GABAergic activity; however, the impact of GABAB receptor positive allosteric modulators on sleep endpoints remains unclear. Objectives This phase 1 study compared a single dose of ASP8062 (35 mg or 70 mg), a GABAB receptor positive allosteric modulator, with placebo and paroxetine (40 mg). Methods Healthy adult volunteers were randomized to four treatments (35 mg ASP8062, 70 mg ASP8062, paroxetine 40 mg, or matching placebo), each separated by a 14-day washout. Primary endpoints obtained by polysomnography were time in stage N3 or SWS and time in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Secondary endpoints included impact on sleep stages and electroencephalography parameters, pharmacokinetics, nighttime growth hormone (GH), and safety/tolerability. Results In 20 randomized volunteers, ASP8062 led to a significant and seemingly dose-dependent increase in SWS over the entire night; this increase was mainly observed during the first third of the night. ASP8062 did not impact time in REM sleep. Paroxetine had no effect on SWS but produced a significant reduction in time spent in REM sleep. A dose-dependent trend in increased GH release was also observed with ASP8062. Headache and nausea were the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for ASP8062; most TEAEs were mild in severity. Conclusions Single-dose ASP8062 (35 and 70 mg) appeared to result in CNS penetration and enhanced GABAergic activity as measured by increases in slow-wave sleep and growth hormone release.

The third-generation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), represented by osimertinib, has achieved remarkable clinical outcomes in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. However, resistance eventually emerges in most patients and the underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be fully understood. In this study, we generated an osimertinib-acquired resistant lung cancer model from a NSCLC cell line H1975 harboring EGFR L858R and T790M mutations. We found that the capacity of DNA damage repair was compromised in the osimertinib resistant cells, evidenced by increased levels of γH2AX and higher intensity of the comet tail after withdrawal from cisplatin. Pharmacological inhibiting the activity or genetic knockdown the expression of DNA-PK, a key kinase in DNA damage response (DDR), sensitized the resistant cells to osimertinib. Combination of osimertinib with the DNA-PK inhibitor, PI-103, or NU7441, synergistically suppressed the proliferation of the resistant cells. Mechanistically, we revealed that DNA-PK inhibitor in combination with osimertinib resulted in prolonged DNA damage and cell cycle arrest. These findings shed new light on the mechanisms of osimertinib resistance in the aspect of DNA repair, and provide a rationale for targeting DNA-PK as a therapeutic strategy to overcome osimertinib-acquired resistance in NSCLC.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of low-dose ruxolitinib (daily dose ≤ 10 mg) for the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). A retrospective analysis was performed on a total of 88 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated MF (MPN-MF) who were diagnosed and treated in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. A total of 44 MPN-MF patients received a low dose of ruxolitinib (daily dose ≤ 10 mg), while another 44 patients received 10-25 mg twice daily. Low-dose ruxolitinib treatment resulted in slow, but gradual spleen response. Compared with baseline, the mean changes in palpable spleen length in the low- and high-dose groups were -26.9 and -49.0% after 12 weeks of treatment, respectively, and -46.7 and -64.1% after 48 weeks of treatment, respectively. In the low dose group, the median myeloproliferative neoplasm symptom assessment form (MPN-SAF) total symptom score (TSS) decreased by 37.8 and 35.9% at the 12 weeks and 48 weeks after treatment, respectively. No statistical difference was observed in MPN-SAF TSS among different dose groups. After 48 weeks of treatment, bone marrow (BM) fibrosis improved in 43.3% (13/30) of evaluated patients and was stable in 56.7% (17/30) patients. In the low-dose treated group, BM fibrosis improved in 50% patients and was stable in remaining 50%. Low-dose ruxolitinib is effective in treating MF.

Pyrimidine analogues can be considered as prodrugs, like their natural counterparts, they have to be activated within the cell. The intracellular activation involves several metabolic steps including sequential phosphorylation to its monophosphate, diphosphate and triphosphate. The intracellularly formed nucleotides are responsible for the pharmacological effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the clinical studies that measured the intracellular nucleotide concentrations of pyrimidine analogues in patients with cancer. The objective was to gain more insight into the parallels between the different pyrimidine analogues considering their intracellular pharmacokinetics. For cytarabine and gemcitabine, the intracellular pharmacokinetics have been extensively studied over the years. However, for 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, azacitidine and decitabine, the intracellular pharmacokinetics was only very minimally investigated. This is probably owing to the fact that there were no suitable bioanalytical assays for a long time. Since the advent of suitable assays, the first exploratory studies indicate that the intracellular 5-fluorouracil, azacitidine and decitabine nucleotide concentrations are very low compared with the intracellular nucleotide concentrations obtained during treatment with cytarabine or gemcitabine. Based on their pharmacology, the intracellular accumulation of nucleotides appears critical to the cytotoxicity of pyrimidine analogues. However, not many clinical studies have actually investigated the relationship between the intracellular nucleotide concentrations in patients with cancer and the anti-tumour effect. Only for cytarabine, a relationship was demonstrated between the intracellular triphosphate concentrations in leukaemic cells and the response rate in patients with AML. Future clinical studies should show, for the other pyrimidine analogues, whether there is a relationship between the intracellular nucleotide concentrations and the clinical outcome of patients. Research that examined the intracellular pharmacokinetics of cytarabine and gemcitabine focused primarily on the saturation aspect of the intracellular triphosphate formation. Attempts to improve the dosing regimen of gemcitabine were aimed at maximising the intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate concentrations. However, this strategy does not make sense, as efficient administration also means that less gemcitabine can be administered before dose-limiting toxicities are achieved. For all pyrimidine analogues, a linear relationship was found between the dose and the plasma concentration. However, no correlation was found between the plasma concentration and the intracellular nucleotide concentration. The concentration-time curves for the intracellular nucleotides showed considerable inter-individual variation. Therefore, the question arises whether pyrimidine analogue therapy should be more individualised. Future research should show which intracellular nucleotide concentrations are worth pursuing and whether dose individualisation is useful to achieve these concentrations.

A 72-year-old man who underwent pazopanib therapy for soft-tissue sarcoma in the left leg was referred to our department because of elevated levels of liver enzymes. Laboratory tests showed high alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin levels. He was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (mPSL) therapy (125 mg/day) followed by oral prednisolone and ursodeoxycholic acid therapy, but his liver enzyme abnormality deteriorated and he presented with jaundice. The intravenous mPSL (250 mg/day) treatment was effective and the abnormal levels of liver enzymes and jaundice were improved. He does not carry the UGT1A1*28 mutant allele. Based on our findings, patients presenting with markedly increased liver enzyme levels and jaundice after pazopanib may require steroid therapy.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and can cause graft failure or multi-organ failure. Here, we report two children with refractory HCT-associated HLH treated with ruxolitinib. In the first patient, ruxolitinib resolved fever, cytopenia and hyperferritinemia. In another patient, although severe hepatic failure, which developed and worsened before the administration of ruxolitinib, was irreversible, rapid improvement in fever, leukopenia and hyperferritinemia was observed. Of note, multiplex cytokine profiling showed amelioration of cytokine storm in both patients. Ruxolitinib may be an encouraging option for HCT-associated HLH.

Ceritinib is a potent selective ALK inhibitor with a manageable safety profile. In anecdotal reports, ceritinib was associated with organizing pneumonia (OP), which could be confused with disease progression. We aimed to delineate the characteristics of OP that occurs during treatment with ceritinib, and evaluate its clinical implications. We retrospectively analyzed 44 lung cancer patients whose tumors harbored ALK or ROS1 fusions and who had received ceritinib. OP diagnosis was based on radiographic and clinical features. Four OP cases were pathologically confirmed. Among 44 patients, 22 OP events occurred in 16 (36.4%) patients. The median time to the first event was 17.2 weeks (range 6.7–68.7 weeks). All events were grade 1 or 2. Radiographic features were categorized into four patterns: nodular (54.6%), consolidation (27.3%), parenchymal band (4.5%), and ground-glass opacity (GGO) (13.6%). OP improved in 20 events with drug interruption or corticosteroids. The median duration of OP was 11.3 weeks (range 2–24 weeks). Tumor response rate was 75% in OP-positive and 42.9% in OP-negative groups. The median progression-free survival was 16.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.1–not applicable (NA)] in OP-positive and 5.4 months (95% CI 3.6–8.4) in OP-negative patients (P = 0.004). The median overall survival was 46.2 months (95% CI 38.1–NA) in OP-positive and 10.5 months (95% CI 6.2–18.9) in OP-negative patients (P

Background It is unclear whether the UGT1A1 status, single heterozygous (SH) or wild type (WT), is associated with the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We investigated the association between clinical outcomes (efficacy and safety) and UGT1A1 status in patients who received irinotecan monotherapy. Methods We evaluated AGC patients who received irinotecan monotherapy between January 2011 and December 2017. Efficacy was assessed according to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Toxicity was graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Results A total of 100 patients were evaluated (62 and 38 patients with UGT1A1 WT and SH, respectively). In the WT and SH groups, the irinotecan dose was reduced in 19 (30.6%) and 18 (47.2%) patients (p = 0.135), respectively; treatment was delayed due to adverse events (AEs) in 19 (30.6%) and 13 (34.2%) patients (p = 0.826), respectively; the median PFS was 3.15 and 3.25 months (HR, 0.734; 95% CI 0.465–1.158; p = 0.184), respectively; and the median OS was 10.4 and 7.26 months (HR, 1.137; 95% CI 0.752–1.721; p = 0.543), respectively. Severe hematological AEs (Grade ≥ 3) were significantly more frequent in the SH group than in the WT group (63% vs. 36%; p = 0.008), while severe non-hematological AEs was not significantly different (16.0% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.173). Conclusion There was no significant difference in the efficacy of irinotecan monotherapy between UGT1A1 WT and UGT1A1 SH, but UGT1A1 SH was associated with a high frequency of severe hematological toxicity.

A 40-year-old woman (case 1) visited the hospital complaining of diarrhea and was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC). She was administered 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), but developed intolerance. Prednisolone (PSL) was administered, and her symptoms improved. However, alopecia areata developed as the PSL was tapered, and her UC relapsed. Adalimumab, Infliximab (IFX), and golimumab were used, but all showed insufficient efficacy. Therefore, we started tofacitinib (TOF). Her bloody stools and diarrhea improved 3 days after TOF administration, and clinical remission occurred on day 14. Her alopecia areata improved 14 days after starting TOF and improved completely during TOF maintenance therapy. A 19-year-old man (case 2) had developed alopecia areata at 10 years old and was diagnosed with UC at 17 years old. He achieved sustained remission with IFX, but then stopped IFX to receive a live vaccination. His UC relapsed 4 months later, immediately after the live vaccine was administered. Vedolizumab was administered, but was ineffective, as was re-administration of IFX. TOF was administered, and his clinical symptoms improved 7 days later. He achieved clinical remission on day 20. In addition, his hair began to regrow 14 days after starting TOF.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of acid suppressive therapy on clinical efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). A single-center retrospective study was carried out. Charts of mRCC patients who received pazopanib as first-line treatment were reviewed and concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) was studied. Two groups of patients were identified, namely patients receiving PPI/H2RA and patients without acid suppressive therapy. Both groups were compared with regard to progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and time to dose reduction of pazopanib. Ninety-one patients were included. Median PFS was 8 months in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 7 months in the no PPI/H2RA group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42–1.35)), p = 0.35. Median OS was 27 months in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 23 months in the no PPI/H2RA group (HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.46–1.66)), p = 0.68. Mean tumor response was 17% (95% CI 8–25%) in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 11% (95% CI 0–21%) in the no PPI/H2RA group, p = 0.52. Median time to first dose reduction was 9 months in both subgroups (HR 1.25 (95% CI 0.65–2.39)), p = 0.51. Median time to second dose (< 600 mg) reduction was 17 months in the PPI/H2RA group vs. 7 months in the no PPI/H2RA group (HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.07–0.89)), p = 0.03. In this limited patient series, no evidence of a negative impact of PPI/H2RA on clinical outcome and time to first dose reduction was observed. These results suggest that PPI/H2RA might be considered, when there is a clinical need, in patients treated with pazopanib for mRCC. However, a prospective study is warranted to confirm these results.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) provokes a critical oncogenic mechanism to activate intracellular signaling by LMP1. LMP1 specifically mimics the role of BTK-dependent B cell receptor. Therefore, a trial considering RCHOP therapy along with ibrutinib (I-RCHOP) in combination was conducted among patients with EBV-positive DLBCL. This study was an open-label, single-arm, prospective multicenter phase II clinical trial. Patients received 560 mg of ibrutinib with RCHOP every 3 weeks until 6 cycles were completed or progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was objective response, while secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. A matched case-control analysis was completed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of I-RCHOP and RCHOP, respectively, in EBV-positive DLBCL patients. From September 2016 to August 2019, 24 patients proven to have EBV-positive DLBCL in the tissue were enrolled and received I-RCHOP. Their median age was 58 years (range, 28–84 years). The objective overall response was 66.7%, including 16 patients who achieved complete response after 6 cycles. Patients aged younger than 65 years presented a superior OR (87.5%) as compared with those older than 65 years (25.0%; p = 0.01). In a matched case-control study, I-RCHOP therapy provoked a more favorable complete response rate (87.3%) than did RCHOP (68.8%) in those younger than 65 years. Treatment-related mortality was linked most frequently with I-RCHOP therapy (four patients presented with unusual infection without Gr3/4 neutropenia) in the older age group (age ≥ 65 years). In conclusion, in this phase II trial for EBV-positive DLBCL, I-RCHOP was effective but did not show a significant improvement in response and survival in comparison with RCHOP. Also, I-RCHOP promoted serious toxicity and treatment-related death in older patients. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00277-020-04005-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

We conducted a phase I-II study to evaluate Nilotinib (NIL) safety and pharmacokinetics in 22 SR-cGVHD patients; we also evaluated ORR by using in parallel NIH criteria and an exploratory approach, combining objective improvement (OI) without failure criteria (GITMO criteria). Results: 22 patients were enrolled. After dose escalation up to 600 mg/day, MTD was not reached. Main toxicities were asthenia, headache, nausea, pruritus, cramps, and mild anemia. Mean and median plasma concentrations of NIL (C-NIL) were 817 (SD ± 450) and 773 ng/ml. ORR at 6 months, according to 2005 and 2014 NIH and GITMO criteria were 27.8%, 22.2%, and 55.6% respectively; close correspondence has been observed for ORR, according to 2014 NIH criteria, both assessed in a conventional way and assisted by dedicated software (CROSY). At 48 months OS was 75% while FFS, according to NIH and GITMO criteria, was 30 and 25%. In conclusion the safety profile of NIL and long-term outcome makes NIL an attractive option in SR-cGVHD. Exploratory GITMO criteria could represent an alternative tool for easy response evaluation in patients with prevalent skin and lung involvement, but require validation in a larger population; CROSY software showed excellent reliability in capturing ORR according to the 2014 NIH criteria.

Secondary lymphohistiocytosis is a severe inflammatory condition characterized by uncontrolled inflammatory response hyperactivation of antigen-presenting cells, hemophagocytosis, cytopenias, and multiorgan failure, and is secondary to subjacent pathologies such as cancer, infection, or immune disease. Standard treatment includes chemotherapy; however, this is not always possible or safe. Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor can reduce inflammation and cytokine activity and has been used in refractory cases and first-line treatment. Here, we present a 35-year-old patient with HIV infection and secondary lymphohistiocytosis due to CMV/EBV infection who was successfully treated with ruxolitinib as first-line therapy. He rapidly showed clinical and biochemical improvement and transfusion independence without complications.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 gain-of-function (STAT1 GOF) mutations are the most common cause of chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC). We report the effect of oral ruxolitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) family tyrosine kinases, on the clinical and immune status of a 3-year-old male with steroid-dependent severe autoimmunity due to a STAT1 GOF T385M mutation. The patient's susceptibility to infection improved with antimicrobial prophylaxis and immunoglobulin replacement therapy, but he continued to exhibit severely disabling symptoms of autoimmunity. More than one-third of patients with STAT1 GOF mutations present with autoimmune manifestations, and this patient's mutation was reported to cause CMC with autoimmunity. We analyzed the interleukin (IL)-17A and IFN-γ levels and immunophenotype by flow cytometry before and during treatment with ruxolitinib. The peripheral IL-17A level did not increase, but the IFN-γ level decreased after 4 months of therapy. The STAT1 phosphorylation level decreased significantly upon stimulation of patient cells with IFN-γ. Clinically, cytomegalovirus reactivation occurred, but was controlled. No other adverse effect was noted. We report the potential of JAK1/2 inhibition with ruxolitinib for both CMC and steroid-dependent autoimmunity. However, long-term administration is necessary, as the effect is not sustained after treatment is discontinued.

The aim was to compare outcomes in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who switched to infliximab-dyyb with those who remained on reference product (RP) infliximab in the United States (US) in a retrospective, propensity score-matched, non-inferiority cohort trial.This study was a retrospective, non-inferiority study conducted within a US integrated healthcare system and included adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. A 1:1 propensity score matching was utilized to match patients who switched to infliximab-dyyb during the period April 2016-March 2018 to patients who remained on RP infliximab. The non-inferiority margin was set at + 10% of the upper limit. The primary outcome was a composite measure of disease worsening requiring acute care after the index date of switching to infliximab-dyyb or continuing RP infliximab. Disease worsening requiring acute care was defined as any IBD-related emergency room visit, hospitalization, or surgery. The secondary outcome was the composite measure of disease worsening requiring acute care or treatment failure. A switch to another biologic or tofacitinib was a proxy for treatment failure. All patients were followed for up to 9 months.After propensity score matching, the matched cohort included 1409 patients in the infliximab-dyyb group and 1409 patients in the RP infliximab group. The overall mean age (± standard deviation) was 47.7 ± 17.0 years, 50.9% of patients were of male gender, and 51.8% of patients had Crohn's disease, while the remainder of the cohort had ulcerative colitis. There were 144 patients (10.2%) in the infliximab-dyyb group and 245 patients (17.4%) in the RP infliximab group who experienced disease worsening requiring acute care (P 0.01 for non-inferiority). There were 347 patients (24.6%) in the infliximab-dyyb group who experienced disease worsening requiring acute care or treatment failure compared to 375 patients (26.6%) who remained on RP infliximab (P 0.01 for non-inferiority).There was no increased risk of (1) disease worsening requiring acute care or (2) disease worsening requiring acute care or treatment failure in patients with IBD who switched from RP infliximab to infliximab-dyyb when compared to patients who remained on RP infliximab in this US population. Infliximab-dyyb is an option for patients with IBD who need to use RP infliximab.

Acute and chronic steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (srGVHD) is a life-threatening complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. There are a number of reports on case series describing efficacy of ruxolitinib in both acute and chronic srGVHD. We conducted a prospective study (NCT02997280) in 75 patients with srGVHD (32 acute, 43 chronic, 41 adults, and 34 children). Patients with chronic GVHD had severe disease in 83% of cases, and acute GVHD patients had grade III–IV disease in 66% of cases. The overall response rate (ORR) was 75% (95% CI 57–89%) in acute GVHD and 81% (95% CI 67–92%) in chronic. Overall survival was 59% (95% CI 49–74%) in acute group and 85% (95% CI 70–93%). The major risk factors for lower survival were grade III–IV gastrointestinal involvement (29% vs 93%, p = 0.0001) in acute form and high disease risk score in chronic (65% vs 90%, p = 0.038). Toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 79% and 44% of grade III–IV neutropenia in acute and chronic groups, respectively. There was no difference between adults and children in terms of ORR (p = 0.31, p = 0.35), survival (p = 0.44, p = 0.12) and toxicity (p > 0.93). The study demonstrated that ruxolitinib is an effective option in acute and chronic srGVHD and can be used both in adults and children.

A new magnetic molecularly imprinted nanofiber (MMIN) nanocomposite was prepared and used to the selective extraction of nilotinib. MMIN was constructed using a novel and general method including a combination of molecular imprinting and electrospinning technology. By electrospun precursor nanofibers containing polyacrylonitrile, Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles, and nilotinib as the template, molecularly imprinted nanofibers were produced with a mean diameter of 500 nm and lengths up to several millimeters. The microstructure and morphology of the prepared MMIN were thoroughly investigated using techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The MMIN was then used to the extraction of nilotinib. The extracted nilotinib was re-extracted and determined spectrofluorimetrically at the excitation and emission wavelengths of 271 and 335 nm, respectively. The relation between fluorescence signal for the re-extracted solution and nilotinib concentration was linear in the range 0.01–10.0 mg L−1 (n = 9) and the RSD for the determination of 1.0 and 5.0 mg L−1 nilotinib 2.75% and 1.09% (n = 3), respectively. The detection limit of the method was obtained as 0.002 mg L−1 nilotinib. The results indicated that the proposed method can be successfully applied to the determination of nilotinib in human serum samples.

It is well known that the second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib evokes an immunological reaction as an off-target effect and induces large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) expansion in 30% of patients. However, LGLs expansion in nilotinib-treated patients is rare. We report the case of a 65-year-old patient with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who showed LGLs expansion during nilotinib treatment. The patient achieved complete remission (CR) after multi-agent chemotherapy combined with dasatinib treatment. However, ALL relapsed in the central nervous system and bone marrow when treatment was interrupted due to interstitial pneumonia. Nilotinib treatment was subsequently started and the patient achieved second CR. Marked peripheral blood lymphocytosis emerged after the start of nilotinib treatment. CD8 + CD57 + cytotoxic T cells were predominantly expanded and showed strong cytocidal activity against K562 Ph-positive leukemia cells. These results suggest that similar to dasatinib, nilotinib can induce LGLs expansion, possibly contributing to long-term remission in patients with Ph-ALL.

To identify the optimum response criteria for first-line targeted pazopanib therapy in patients with mRCC using solid tumor response criteria and clinical risk factors. Pre- and post-treatment CTs of patients (n = 43) with mRCC treated with first-line pazopanib therapy were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment response was evaluated with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, Choi, modified Choi (mChoi), revised Choi (rChoi), MASS (Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure), 10% threshold criteria, and subjective assessment. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium clinical risk factors were also used to define response groups. Response evaluations were correlated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using log-rank test. Patients with partial response (PR) by mChoi and rChoi had longer OS than those with stable disease (SD) (P

Aprocitentan is an orally active dual endothelin receptor antagonist that targets a novel pathway in the treatment of difficult-to-control (resistant) hypertension. The drug–drug interaction potential of aprocitentan on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes was investigated in this open-label, two-treatment single-sequence study. The primary and main secondary objectives were to study the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in the absence and presence of aprocitentan and the safety and tolerability of combined administration, respectively. Nineteen healthy male subjects received a single dose of 8 mg midazolam. Thereafter, they started aprocitentan treatment (loading dose of 150 mg followed by 50 mg once daily) and received another single dose of midazolam with aprocitentan at steady state. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of midazolam and its metabolite 1-hydroxy midazolam were assessed over 24 h after each midazolam administration. At steady state, aprocitentan did not affect the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of midazolam and 1-hydroxy midazolam, with a geometric means ratio (GMR) of midazolam + aprocitentan/midazolam alone close to 1 and 90% confidence intervals (CI) between 0.88 and 1.23. For the Cmax of 1-hydroxy midazolam the GMR (90% CI) was 0.86 (0.70–1.05). Somnolence, a known side-effect of midazolam, was reported as the most frequent adverse event. There were no relevant differences in tolerability parameters between treatments. Aprocitentan does not alter the pharmacokinetics of midazolam to a clinically relevant extent and was well tolerated when administered concomitantly. Therefore, aprocitentan can be administered together with drugs that are substrates of CYP3A without dose adjustments.

After analyzing treatment patterns in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (objective 1), we investigated the relative effectiveness of ibrutinib versus other commonly used treatments (objective 2) in patients with treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory CLL, comparing patient-level data from two randomized registration trials with two real-world databases. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. Rituximab-containing regimens were often prescribed in clinical practice. The most frequently prescribed regimens were fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 29.3%), bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 17.7%), and other rituximab-containing regimens (22.0%) in the treatment-naïve setting (n = 604), other non-FCR/BR rituximab-containing regimens (38.7%) and non-rituximab–containing regimens (28.5%) in the relapsed/refractory setting (n = 945). Adjusted HRs (95% CI) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively, with ibrutinib versus real-world regimens were 0.23 (0.14–0.37; p < 0.0001) and 0.40 (0.22–0.76; p = 0.0048) in the treatment-naïve setting, and 0.21 (0.16–0.27; p < 0.0001) and 0.29 (0.21–0.41; p < 0.0001) in the relapsed/refractory setting. When comparing real-world use of ibrutinib (n = 53) versus other real-world regimens in relapsed/refractory CLL (objective 3), adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 0.37 (0.22–0.63; p = 0.0003) for PFS and 0.53 (0.27–1.03; p < 0.0624) for OS. This adjusted analysis, based on nonrandomized patient data, suggests ibrutinib to be more effective than other commonly used regimens for CLL.

Introduction Elagolix is approved for the management of moderate-to-severe pain associated with endometriosis. The aim of this analysis was to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that describes the enzyme-transporter interplay involved in the disposition of elagolix and to predict the magnitude of drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential of elagolix as an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Methods A PBPK model (SimCYP® version 15.0.86.0) was developed using elagolix data from in vitro, clinical PK and DDI studies. Data from DDI studies were used to quantify contributions of the uptake transporter organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 and CYP3A4 in the disposition of elagolix, and to quantitatively assess the perpetrator potential of elagolix as a CYP3A4 inducer and P-gp inhibitor. Results After accounting for the interplay between elagolix metabolism by CYP3A4 and uptake by OATP1B1, the model-predicted PK parameters of elagolix along with the DDI AUC∞ and Cmax ratios, were within 1.5-fold of the observed data. Based on model simulations, elagolix 200 mg administered twice daily is a moderate inducer of CYP3A4 (approximately 56% reduction in midazolam AUC∞). Simulations of elagolix 150 mg administered once daily with digoxin predicted an increase in digoxin Cmax and AUC∞ by 68% and 19%, respectively. Conclusions A PBPK model of elagolix was developed, verified, and applied to characterize the disposition interplay between CYP3A4 and OATP1B1, and to predict the DDI potential of elagolix as a perpetrator under dosing conditions that were not tested clinically. PBPK model-based predictions were used to support labeling language for DDI recommendations of elagolix. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40262-019-00833-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation plays a central role in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) development and progression, and in resistance to anti-cancer therapies. Inhibition of the PI3K pathway has been shown to sensitize cultured glioma cells and tumor xenografts to the effects of temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation. Vistusertib is an oral inhibitor of mTORC1/2 complexes. The primary objective of this Canadian Cancer Trials Group phase I study was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of vistusertib in patients with GBM receiving TMZ at first progression following primary treatment. Vistusertib was administered at a starting dose of 100 mg bid 2 days on/5 days off weekly with TMZ 150 mg/m2 daily for 5 days/28-days cycle. Dose escalation was according to a 3 + 3 design. Secondary objectives included assessment of vistusertib safety and toxicity profile, and preliminary efficacy. 15 patients were enrolled in the study (median age 66 (range 51–77), females 8). Vistusertib 125 mg BID in combination with TMZ 150 mg/m2 daily for 5 days was well tolerated. Vistusertib treatment-related adverse events were generally grade 1–2, with the most frequently reported being fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and rash. Of 13 response evaluable patients, 1 patient (8%) had a partial response ongoing at 7.6 months of follow-up, and 5 patients had stable disease (38%) as best response (median duration 9.6 months, range 3.7-not yet reached). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 26.6%. Combination of vistusertib with TMZ in GBM patients at first recurrence demonstrated a favorable safety profile at the tested dose levels.

Etravirine is a second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. It is a potent inhibitor of HIV reverse transcriptase and retains activity against wild-type and most NNRTI-resistant HIV. The pharmacokinetic profile of etravirine and clinical data support twice-daily dosing, although once-daily dosing has been investigated in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced persons. Despite similar pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic results compared with twice-daily dosing, larger studies are needed to fully support once-daily etravirine dosing in treatment-naïve individuals. Etravirine is reserved for use in third- or fourth-line antiretroviral treatment regimens, as recommended, for example, in treatment guidelines by the US Department of Health and Human Services—Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV. Etravirine exhibits the potential for bi-directional drug–drug interactions with other antiretrovirals and concomitant medications through its interactions with cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes: CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. This review summarizes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of etravirine, with particular attention to information on drug–drug interactions and use in special patient populations, including children/adolescents, women, persons with organ dysfunction, and during pregnancy.

Pazopanib is approved in Latin America as first targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). A retrospective chart review of adult patients with mRCC who initiated pazopanib as first targeted therapy between January 2011 and March 2016 was conducted among oncology care centers in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events were summarized. A total of 156 charts of patients with mRCC receiving first-line pazopanib were reviewed (29, 54, 27, 28, and 18 patients from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico, respectively). The mean age at initial mRCC diagnosis was 61.6 years, 73.7% were male, and 51.3% were Hispanic. The median dose of pazopanib was 800 mg and the median time from initial mRCC diagnosis to pazopanib start was 2.2 months. The median time on treatment was 10.0 months. At the time of data extraction, 16.7% of patients remained on pazopanib, with clinical progression listed as the main reason for discontinuation. Subsequent therapy was received by 25.6% of patients; the most common were everolimus (9.6%) and axitinib (5.8%). Overall, median PFS and OS were 10.8 and 16.9 months, respectively, and varied across countries. The most common all-grade adverse events were diarrhea (44.9%), asthenia/fatigue (43.6%), and nausea (28.8%). Pazopanib was used for first-line mRCC treatment in a clinically diverse patient population across Latin America. Real-world PFS and tolerability were similar to clinical studies of pazopanib. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Inc.

Research comparing bosentan and macitentan in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is scarce, although macitentan might have superior pharmacologic properties. We present the first real-world, 2-year follow-up results and compare clinical outcomes of both drugs in CTEPH. All consecutive, technical inoperable or residual CTEPH patients receiving bosentan or macitentan, diagnosed in our multidisciplinary team between January 2003 and January 2019, were included. We report and compare survival, clinical worsening (CW), adverse events, WHO FC, NT-proBNP and 6-min walking test (6MWT) until 2 years after medication initiation. In total, 112 patients receiving bosentan or macitentan (58% female, mean age 62 ± 14 years, 68% WHO FC III/IV, 51% bosentan) could be included. Mean treatment duration was 1.9 ± 0.4 years for bosentan and 1.2 ± 0.6 years for macitentan. Two-year survival rate was 91% for bosentan and 80% for macitentan (HR mortality macitentan 1.85 [0.56–6.10], p = 0.31). Two-year CW-free survival was 81% and 58%, respectively (HR CW macitentan 2.16 [0.962–4.87], p = 0.06). Right atrial pressure, cardiac output (for mortality alone) and 6MWT lowest saturation were multivariate predictors at baseline. Overall adverse event rates were comparable and WHO FC, NT-proBNP and 6MWT distance improved similar for both drugs till 2-year follow-up. CTEPH patients receiving bosentan or macitentan have improved clinical outcomes till 2-year follow-up, without significant differences in outcomes between both therapies.

A trial-based assessment was completed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Based on the disease situation of advanced NSCLC, a Markov model was constructed to estimate the costs and benefits of ceritinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. The cost information and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. The stability of the model was verified by sensitivity analyses. The base case analysis results indicated that compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, ceritinib therapy would increase benefits in a 5-, 10- and 15-year time horizon, with extra costs of $230,661.61, $149,321.52 and $136,414.43 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. The most sensitive parameter in the model analysis was the cost of ceritinib. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that at the current price of ceritinib, the chance of ceritinib being cost-effective was 0 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $27,142.85 per quality-adjusted life-year (three times the per capita gross domestic product of China). As a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ceritinib is unlikely to be cost-effective at the current price from the Chinese healthcare perspective. To meet the treatment demands of patients, it may be a better option to reduce the price or provide appropriate drug assistance policies.

Janus kinases (JAKs) are a family of non-receptor kinases that play a key role in cytokine signaling and their aberrant activities are associated with the pathogenesis of various immune diseases. The JAK1 isoform plays an essential role in the types 1 and II interferon signaling and elicits signals from the interleukin-2, interleukin-4, gp130, and class 2 receptor families. It is ubiquitously expressed in humans and its overexpression has been linked with autoimmune diseases such as myeloproliferative neoplasm. Although JAK1 inhibitors such as Tofacitinib have been approved for medical use, the low potency and off-target effects of these inhibitors have limited their use and calls for the development of novel JAK1 inhibitors. In this study, we used computational methods on a series of pyrrolopyridine derivatives to design new JAK1 inhibitors. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation methods were used to study the protein-inhibitor interactions. 3D-quantitative structure–activity relationship models were developed and were used to predict the activity of newly designed compounds. Free energy calculation methods were used to study the binding affinity of the inhibitors with JAK1. Of the designed compounds, seventeen of the compounds showed a higher binding energy value than the most active compound in the dataset and at least six of the compounds showed higher binding energy value than the pan JAK inhibitor Tofacitinib. The findings made in this study could be utilized for the further development of JAK1 inhibitors.

Background Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Methods We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Results A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). Conclusion Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape.

Objective Given the high economic burden of disease among adult patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following a worsening heart failure event in the US, this study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness of vericiguat plus prior standard-of-care therapies (PSoCT) versus PSoCT alone from a US Medicare perspective. Methods A four-state Markov model (alive prior to heart failure hospitalization, alive during heart failure hospitalization, alive post-heart failure hospitalization, and death) was developed to predict clinical and economic outcomes, based on the results of the VICTORIA trial, in which patients with chronic HFrEF following a worsening heart failure were randomized to placebo or vericiguat, in addition to PSoCT, which consisted of β-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and the angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan. Risks of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular mortality were based on multivariable regression models derived from VICTORIA data. Utilities were derived from VICTORIA EQ-5D data and the literature. Costs included drug acquisition, heart failure hospitalization, routine care, and terminal care. Primary outcomes included heart failure hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental costs per QALY gained over a 30-year lifetime horizon, discounted at 3.0% annually. Results For the VICTORIA overall intent-to-treat population, compared with PSoCT, vericiguat plus PSoCT resulted in 19 fewer heart failure hospitalizations and 13 fewer cardiovascular deaths per 1000 patients, as well as 0.28 QALY gained per patient at an incremental cost of $23,322, leading to $82,448 per QALY gained. Conclusions Based on the results of VICTORIA, patients treated with vericiguat had lower rates of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death. The addition of vericiguat to PSoCT was estimated to increase QALYs and to be cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-021-01091-w.