Search

Purpose: Understanding the influence of microorganisms in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) and investigating their effect on recurrence after external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods: This prospective study included 50 patients. Evaluations were made before, on the first postoperative day and monthly after DCR. Nasolacrimal silicon tubes (NST) were removed after three months. Before the DCR, swab samples were taken from both hands and lower conjunctival fornices and from the lacrimal sac during the first DCR and from the relapsed cases during the second DCR. Results: Growth was observed in 90 (45%) cultures out of 200 and a total of 23 different strains were identified altogether. Staphylococcus aureus (40%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (28%) were dominantly isolated which were all resistant to penicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin. Lacrimal syringing (LS) was successful in patients (100%) on the first postoperative day. After three months, before NST removal, purulent discharge from the punctum was observed in five patients, and blockage was detected by LS. S. pneumoniae was isolated from all five patients' obstructed side conjunctival cultures. Additionally, from their lacrimal sac, S. pneumoniae (4 patients), Capnocytophaga gingivalis, and Candida spp. (1 patient) strains were isolated. S pneumoniae was isolated in four out of five patients from the ipsilateral conjunctival and lacrimal sac cultures which obtained from the subsequent DCR. Conclusion: Our results showed that S. pneumoniae was an isolated and persistent strain in cases with early recurrence even after a successful DCR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated rapid expansion of telehealth as part of healthcare delivery. This study compared HIV-related no-shows by visit type (in-person; video; telephone) during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020–September 2021) from the Data for Care Alabama project. Using all primary care provider visits, each visit's outcome was categorized as no-show or arrived. A logistic regression model using generalized estimating equations accounting for repeat measures in individuals and within sites calculated odds ratios (OR) and their accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI) for no-shows by visit modality. The multivariable models adjusted for sociodemographic factors. In-person versus telephone visits [OR (95% CI) 1.64 (1.48–1.82)] and in-person versus video visits [OR (95% CI) 1.53 (1.25–1.85)] had higher odds of being a no-show. In-person versus telephone and video no-shows were significantly higher. This may suggest success of telehealth visits as a method for HIV care delivery even beyond COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This review summarizes HIV care delivered via telemedicine before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights areas of study to inform optimal usage of telemedicine in HIV clinical practice in the future. Recent Findings: To address barriers to care created by the COVID-19 pandemic, regulatory agencies and payors waived longstanding restrictions, which enabled rapid expansion of telemedicine across the country. Preliminary data show that providers and persons with HIV (PWH) view telemedicine favorably. Some data suggest telemedicine has facilitated retention in care, but other studies have found increasing numbers of PWH lost to follow-up and worsened virologic suppression rates despite offering video and/or telephone visits. Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated gaps in the HIV care continuum. To help mitigate the impact, most clinics have adopted new virtual care options and are now evaluating usage, impact, and concerns. Further research into the effects of telemedicine on HIV care and continued work towards universal access are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]