In this article, the author focuses on race and the underdevelopment of the so-called American "welfare state," based on the various essays and articles by different authors and researchers. Over the past decade, scholarship on the structure and development of social policy in the United States tended to treat race as little more than a mediating factor between class or institutional factors, on the one hand, and welfare state outcomes on the other. The emerging field of race and welfare politics contains three distinct nodes: first, historical analyses of the interaction between race and U.S. political institutions; second, analyses of the class or race and gender nexus, especially in regard to the political economy of the South America; and third, analyses of the impact of racial attitudes and racism on political beliefs and policy preferences. The American welfare state is described in three ways. First, that it contains few universal social programs of the type found in Europe. The U.S. has no system of national health insurance, but it also lacks a "safety net" for those without work, and many other types of programs found elsewhere. Second, that it is a uniquely decentralized welfare state, with numerous programs operated entirely or in large measure at the discretion of state or even local governments, a trend accentuated by the 1996 welfare reform. Third, that the U.S. devotes a very high percentage of its anti-poverty expenditures on "opportunity" programs designed to give members of disadvantaged groups a better change of competing within the labor market, as opposed to direct income transfers, specially since 1960s.