Search

The validity of forearm fracture diagnoses recorded in five Norwegian hospitals was investigated using image reports and medical records as gold standard. A relatively high completeness and correctness of the diagnoses was found. Algorithms used to define forearm fractures in administrative data should depend on study purpose., Purpose: In Norway, forearm fractures are routinely recorded in the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). However, these data have not been validated. Data from patient administrative systems (PAS) at hospitals are sent unabridged to NPR. By using data from PAS, we aimed to examine (1) the validity of the forearm fracture diagnoses and (2) the usefulness of washout periods, follow-up codes, and procedure codes to define incident forearm fracture cases., Methods: This hospital-based validation study included women and men aged ≥ 19 years referred to five hospitals for treatment of a forearm fracture during selected periods in 2015. Administrative data for the ICD-10 forearm fracture code S52 (with all subgroups) in PAS and the medical records were reviewed. X-ray and computed tomography (CT) reports from examinations of forearms were reviewed independently and linked to the data from PAS. Sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated using image reports and/or review of medical records as gold standard., Results: Among the 8482 reviewed image reports and medical records, 624 patients were identified with an incident forearm fracture during the study period. The sensitivity of PAS registrations was 90.4% (95% CI: 87.8-92.6). The PPV increased from 73.9% (95% CI: 70.6-77.0) in crude data to 90.5% (95% CI: 88.0-92.7) when using a washout period of 6 months. Using procedure codes and follow-up codes in addition to 6-months washout increased the PPV to 94.0%, but the sensitivity fell to 69.0%., Conclusion: A relatively high sensitivity of forearm fracture diagnoses was found in PAS. PPV varied depending on the algorithms used to define cases. Choice of algorithm should therefore depend on study purposes. The results give useful measures of forearm fracture diagnoses from administrative patient registers. Depending on local coding practices and treatment pathways, we infer that the findings are relevant to other fracture diagnoses and registers., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Glucocorticoid use is a risk factor for osteoporosis and fractures. We studied whether women initiating glucocorticoid treatment also started anti-osteoporotic treatment, according to clinical guidelines. Women with versus without previous fracture were twice as likely to start anti-osteoporotic treatment within 1 year after initiating glucocorticoid treatment, but the cumulative incidences were low 9.1% vs. 4.6%, respectively., Purpose: Use of glucocorticoids (GC) is a risk factor for osteoporosis and fractures, and clinical guidelines suggest that preventive treatment with anti-osteoporotic drugs (AOD) should be considered when starting GC. Women with high risk of osteoporosis comprise those with previous fractures or a known inflammatory rheumatic disease, for whom the indication of AOD is even stronger. The purpose of these analyses was to investigate whether women initiating GC treatment also started AOD, especially those with high risk of osteoporosis., Methods: We used data from the Norwegian Prescription Database to identify all women 55 years and older initiating GC treatment in Norway during 2010-2016 and to obtain information on use of AOD. Data from the Norwegian Patient Registry were used to obtain information on previous fractures and diagnoses., Results: Among 105,477 women initiating GC treatment during 2010-2016, 3256 had started AOD and 79,638 had discontinued GC treatment after 1-year follow-up. Cumulative incidence of starting AOD after 1 year was 9.1% (95% CI: 7.9, 10.4) for women with vs. 4.6% (95% CI: 4.4%, 4.8%) for women without a previous fracture. Women with rheumatoid arthritis or another inflammatory rheumatic disease were more likely to start AOD than women with other indications. For the whole cohort, the probability of starting AOD treatment within 1 year after initiating GC increased on average 3% per year (HR = 1.03, CI: 1.01, 1.05) from 2010 to 2016., Conclusions: Having had a previous fracture or an inflammatory rheumatic disease increased the probability of treatment with AOD. However, the proportions starting AOD were much lower than clinically indicated.

Of patients prescribed systemic glucocorticoids, this study identifies the proportion prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment and associated characteristics. Overall, 13.2% of patients were prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment. Predictors included documented osteoporosis, past DXA or fracture, and provision of care within a department using embedded protocols, suggesting electronic medical record-based tools may be beneficial., Purpose: This study aimed to identify a cohort of patients at risk for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis based on their prescribed glucocorticoid regimens and to quantify the proportion who were also prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment. The secondary objective was to recognize patient characteristics associated with receiving such treatment., Methods: A retrospective single-site cohort study used prescription order data to identify 7774 adults prescribed chronic glucocorticoids and measure the proportion also prescribed osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment., Results: Of the total cohort, 1026/7774 (13.2%) had osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment prescribed. Of the subgroups prescribed a prednisone-equivalent of 5, 10, or 20 mg per day or more for at least 180 days, 584/4262 (13.7%), 153/1048 (14.6%), and 47/344 (13.7%) had treatment prescribed. Factors independently associated with osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment initiation included having osteoporosis or osteopenia on the problem list (OR = 4.45, 95% CI 3.70-5.34), history of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.82-2.62), history of fracture (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.54-2.167), and longer duration of glucocorticoid use (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.59). The prescribing department was also a significant predictor of medication initiation, with cardiac transplant (OR = 6.04, 95% CI 3.97-9.17), oncology (OR = 4.11, OR 3.28-5.14), and lung transplant (OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.08, 2.12) being positively correlated with this outcome, and nephrology (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72) and kidney transplant (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.37, 0.75) being negatively correlated., Conclusion: Prescribing rate of osteoporosis pharmacologic treatment in patients using chronic glucocorticoids is low. Examining practices with higher prescribing rates may offer insight into improving protection against osteoporosis-induced fractures., (© 2023. International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation.)

Few studies h ave discussed the association between cortical bone outside the fracture site and the fracture itself. Focusing on hip cortical thickness, this study revealed distinct distributions of the parameters for hip (trochanteric or femoral neck), vertebral, and peripheral osteoporotic fractures and suggested that the spatial distribution of hip cortical thickness was fracture-specific., Purpose: Cortical bone is critical for bone strength. Hip cortical thickness is reported to be closely associated with the incidence of hip fractures, but its relationship with nonhip fractures is rarely studied. As the hip is a major site for fracture risk assessment, it would be of great benefit to investigate the association between hip cortical thickness and different osteoporotic fractures., Methods: One hundred age-matched postmenopausal women were equally assigned to 4 osteoporotic fracture groups (trochanteric, femoral neck, vertebral, and peripheral fractures) and a nonfracture group. Each subject had a clinical quantitative computed tomography scan of the bilateral hips and the lumbar spine. A cortical bone mapping algorithm was adopted to calculate hip cortical thickness. Hip and lumbar trabecular density and the hip cortical thickness distribution were compared among the groups., Results: All the fracture groups presented lower lumbar trabecular density. Compared with nonfracture controls, patients with hip or vertebral fractures but not peripheral fractures showed decreased cortical thickness and trabecular density of the hip. Fracture-specific distributions of cortical thickness were revealed, including zonal defects on the neck-intertrochanter junction, greater trochanter, and the periphery of the lesser trochanter for trochanteric fractures, a focal defect on the anterosuperior neck for femoral neck fractures, a moderate and average distribution for vertebral fractures, and focally thicker cortices on the anterosuperior greater trochanter and the periphery of the lesser trochanter for peripheral fractures., Conclusion: The spatial distribution of hip cortical thickness was different for each type of osteoporotic fracture, and patients with centrally located fractures demonstrated more severe cortical deterioration. This finding needs to be validated in a larger sample., (© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.)

In recent years, a growing interest on the impact of statin intake on bone health has emerged, although the reported results are controversial. The results of this study revealed that BMD at lumbar spine has a significant association with statin intake. However, such association appears to be weaker regarding TBS values compared to BMD. This study was performed with the aim of evaluating associations of statin intake with BMD and TBS using data from 2426 individuals aged ≥ 60 years from the second phase of the Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) program. We found a positive association between statin and BMD at lumbar spine, whereas association between statin and TBS was detected only in the men in the final model., Introduction: In recent years, a growing interest has been established to evaluate the impact of statin intake on bone health, although the reported results are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association of statin intake with bone health status according to BMD and TBS., Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used data from the elderly Iranian individuals who participated in the Bushehr Elderly Health (BEH) program. Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) device was used to evaluate the BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, and total hip, as well as TBS at lumbar spine., Results: Among 2426 (1260 women and 1166 men) study participants, 778 were statin users. A positive significant association, irrespective of sex, was observed between statin intake and BMD at L1-L4, even after controlling for potential variables in total population (β = 0.016, p = 0.013). The mean TBS values at L1-L4 were negatively associated with statin intake in total population (β =  - 0.009, p = 0.001), while in the full adjusted model, significant positive association between TBS and statin intake was detected only in men (β = 0.013, p = 0.02)., Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that BMD at lumbar spine has a significant association with statin intake. However, such an association appears to be weaker regarding TBS values compared to BMD., (© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.)

We evaluated the association of bone fracture with mortality among persons with HIV, controlling for sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical factors. Incident fracture was associated with 48% greater risk of all-cause mortality, underscoring the need for bone mineral density screening and fracture prevention., Purpose/introduction: Low bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture are more common among persons with HIV (PWH) than those without HIV infection. We evaluated the association of bone fracture with mortality among PWH, controlling for sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical factors., Methods: We analyzed data from HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) participants seen at nine US HIV clinics during January 1, 2000, through September 30, 2017. Incident fracture rates and post-fracture mortality were compared across four calendar periods. Cox proportional hazards analyses determined factors associated with all-cause mortality among all participants and those with incident fracture., Results: Among 6763 HOPS participants, 504 (7.5%) had incident fracture (median age = 47 years) and 719 (10.6%) died. Of fractures, 135 (26.8%) were major osteoporotic (hip/pelvis, wrist, spine, arm/shoulder). During observation, 27 participants with major osteoporotic fractures died (crude mortality 2.97/100 person-years [PY]), and 48 with other site fractures died (crude mortality 2.51/100 PY). Post-fracture, age- and sex-adjusted all-cause mortality rates per 100 PY decreased from 8.5 during 2000-2004 to 1.9 during 2013-2017 (P<0.001 for trend). In multivariable analysis, incident fracture was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.91). Among 504 participants followed post-fracture, pulmonary, kidney, and cardiovascular disease, hepatitis C virus co-infection, and non-AIDS cancer, remained independently associated with all-cause mortality., Conclusions: Incident fracture was associated with 48% greater risk of all-cause mortality among US PWH in care, underscoring the need for BMD screening and fracture prevention. Although fracture rates among PWH increased during follow-up, post-fracture death rates decreased, likely reflecting advances in HIV care., (© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.)