Search

This document is a first response to the need to develop sexual health services for young people on a single site whilst awaiting research from pilot studies of 'one stop shops' suggested in the Sexual Health and HIV strategy. It is a document which is intended to be a tool to use for those wishing to set up a service providing testing for sexually transmitted infections and provision of contraceptive services for those under 25 years. It is not intended that such a service would replace existing specialist or general practice care but complement it, allowing clients to choose the service most appropriate and acceptable to them, with close links and clear pathways of care for referral between services. This paper should be used as a template when initiating and monitoring a clinic but some of the standards may not be achievable without significant financial input. However, economic limitations should not detract from striving to achieve the best possible care for those most at risk from sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies. For example, not all clinics will be able to provide the recommended tests for the diagnosis for gonorrhoea and chlamydia immediately, but should work towards achieving them. Although the upper age limit in this document is defined as 25 years, some providers may wish to limit clinics to those under 20 depending on local needs. Detailed information on specific issues such as consent and confidentiality, provision of contraception, investigation of non-sexually transmitted vaginal infections and sexually transmitted infection management and diagnosis are referenced and we recommend these are accessed by the users of this document. Many of the references themselves are live documents available on the worldwide web, and are constantly updated. The Sexual Health and HIV Strategy has now been published and these standards are aimed at those who wish to provide a level 2 sexual health service for young people wherever the setting e.g. genitourinary outreach clinic, contraceptive services, general practice. This document is a starting point to be reviewed and updated as new research becomes available, as the Sexual Health Strategy is implemented and with further input from providers of care (family planning, general practice, genitourinary medicine, gynaecology and paediatrics) and service users. All service providers must maintain a high quality of care and have networks both with those who provide more specialized services (Level 3) and Level 1 services. This document is an initial attempt to ensure that there is equity of clinical provision wherever a Level 2 sexual health service is provided and should be a useful tool for those setting up or monitoring services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the treatment of uncomplicated genital chlamydial infection. Chlamydia is found to be the most frequently occurring sexually transmitted bacterial infection in young sexually active people. The treatment of the disease is dependent not only on the screening of infection but aslo on proper antibiotic treatment and sex counseling. The possibility of reinfection could be reduced by properly notifying the sexual partners.

Genitourinary medicine services have come under severe workload pressure to deal with unprecedented demand over the past five years. Waiting times for patients wishing to access the service have increased significantly. In order to maintain open access for those who require acute attention, many services have introduced triage systems for patients who attend without appointments (walk-ins). We have evaluated a policy of triage for such patients, and the incidence of sentinel sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (gonorrhoea and chlamydia) was determined in those who failed to meet the criteria. Our study has shown a low incidence of STI (1.7%) in those who failed to meet the triage criteria, thus validating the policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We sought to investigate contraceptive use in women attending a genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic, and to assess the need for a contraceptive service in this setting. Female attendees at Nottingham GUM clinic were invited to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding past and present contraceptive use and whether a contraceptive service within GUM would be utilized. Four hundred and eighty-nine questionnaires were analysed. The majority had previously used condoms (89.8%) or the combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) (74.6%), and 46.6% and 37.4%, respectively were currently using these methods. Contraception was frequently used for the dual aims of avoiding both pregnancy and infection (48.5%). General practitioners (GPs) and family planning clinics were most frequently cited as sources of regular contraceptive advice, 58.1% and 47.2% respectively, and emergency contraception 50.8% and 37.3%, respectively. If a contraceptive service was available within GUM 56.9% of respondents indicated they would use it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to determine whether the success of partner notification for gonorrhoea in men was affected by sexual orientation. Analysis of standard clinic and health adviser records of all male patients found to be infected with gonorrhoea between October 1992 and September 1993 were carried out. Of the 278 cases of gonorrhoea in men, 9% (25) were acquired through homosexual intercourse and 91% (253) by heterosexual contact. Fifteen per cent (24) of Caucasians were homosexual but only 0.9% (1) of Afro-Caribbeans were. The mean number of contacts was 1.36 for homosexuals and 1.38 for heterosexuals. Contact information was given by 55% of heterosexuals and 48% of homosexuals. The proportion of acknowledged contacts attending was 38% for homosexuals and 56% for heterosexuals (P = 0.054). Fifty-two per cent of homosexuals and 59% of heterosexuals had at least one contact attend. Data analysis on Caucasians only showed Caucasian gay men had a higher mean number of contacts (1.38) than Caucasian heterosexuals (1.28). Caucasian homosexuals had a lower proportion of contacts attending (40% vs. 77%) (P = 0.05), 54% of homosexual men and 60% of heterosexual men had at least one contact attending (P = 0.74). There is a trend for partner notification to be less successful in homosexual men when all ethnic groups are considered together. In Caucasian men with gonorrhoea, homosexuals have a greater number of partners than heterosexuals and have a lower proportion of total contacts attending but there is no difference in the proportion having at least one contact attending. Data on sexual orientation and ethnicity should be reported in studies assessing efficacy of contact tracing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A response by IH Ahmed-Jushuf to a letter to the editor about his article "What happened to GU medicine funding," is presented.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article in the previous issue of the "International Journal of STD & AIDS" regarding erectile dysfunction treatments.