Search

Background Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), not fully explained by the conventional risk factors. These patients have endothelial dysfunction (ED) as an early process of atherosclerosis, which can be reversed with therapy. Objective To determine the effect of ezetimibe plus pravastatin on endothelial function in patients with SLE after 12 months of treatment. Patients and methods An open study, before and after, which assessed the effect of ezetimibe plus pravastatin treatment, was performed. Twenty two patients (21 women and one man) with diagnosis of SLE were studied, with a mean age 40 ± 5 years. Endothelial dysfunction was evaluated using vascular ultrasound of the brachial artery in order to measure the flow-mediated vasodilation (FMV) basal and after 12 months of treatment with pravastatin 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day. In addition, a lipid profile: total cholesterol (TC), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), was done. Results We found a basal FMV of 7.58% and 18.22% after 12 months of treatment, with an improvement of 10.64 points 95% CI (7.58–13.58), p < 0.001. TC decreased from 201.3 ± 58.9 mg/dL to 158.06 ± 50.13 mg/dL (p < 0.01); LDL-C from 125.78 ± 44.4 mg/dL to 78.8 ± 32.9 mg/dL (p < 0.001); HDL-C increased from 49.0 ± 16.8 mg/dL to 52.2 ± 13.8 mg/dL (p = 0.077). The basal and final concentrations of CRP were 4.49 and 2.8, respectively, with a mean decrease of 2.11 mg/dL, 95% CI (0.908–3.32), p < 0.002. Both drugs were well tolerated. Conclusion Ezetimibe plus pravastatin significantly improved FMV in patients with SLE, decreasing ED and the lipid profile. This treatment ameliorated an early process of atherosclerosis and a risk factor for CVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the clinical, laboratory and histological manifestations of patients who received illegal injections of foreign substances for cosmetic purposes.Patients and methods: We studied patients who met the following inclusion criteria: 1) history of application of foreign substances for cosmetic purposes, 2) clinical data of autoimmune disease or non-specific autoimmune manifestation (i.e. arthralgias, myalgia, malaise, fever, and weight loss), 3) detection of autoantibodies in patients’ sera, 4) histological evidence of chronic inflammation and/or granulomatous reaction to foreign body.Results: Fifty female patients aged 44.4 ± 10 years were studied. The mean time between application of foreign substances and onset of symptoms was 4.5 ± 4.3 years. Patients were followed for 12 ± 7.5 years. Forty-one patients were injected with mineral oil, nine patients received other substances: three iodine gadital, one guayacol, one guayacol plus silicone fluid, two collagen, two silicone fluid. The sites of application were: buttocks (36), legs and/or thighs (11), breasts (eight) hands and face (one), face (two) (seven patients received an injection to more than one site). Thirty patients presented with non-specific autoimmune manifestations, whereas 20 patients fulfilled the criteria for a defined autoimmune disease such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, overlap syndrome, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, autoimmune thyroiditis, autoimmune hepatitis, and ulcerative colitis.Conclusions: Cases of human adjuvant disease following illegal injections of oil substances for cosmetic purposes are reported. Patients presented with defined autoimmune diseases as well as with non-specific autoimmune manifestations. Illegal injection of these substances could lead to serious local and systemic complications, even to death. These cases represent another model of Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA). The use of these substances should be prohibited. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Distinction between infection and flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a challenge in clinical practice. Objective To analyze the utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) plus C-reactive protein (CRP) to differentiate between infection and active disease in patients with SLE. Methods A cross-sectional study of a cohort of patients with SLE was carried out. Blood samples from four groups (patients without infection or active disease, patients with infection, patients with active disease, and patients with both infection and active disease) before therapeutic interventions were analyzed. We excluded patients with current malignancy, pregnancy, ischemic heart disease or use of antimicrobials during previous 7 days. Hematological cell count, CRP and cultures were obtained. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves; sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Results Forty patients were included. NLR cut-off ≥6.3 had sensitivity 70%, specificity 85%, PPV 83% and NPV 74% to detect patients with non-viral infections. A CRP cut-off ≥7.5 mg/L had sensitivity 90%, specificity 75%, PPV 78% and NPV 88% to detect infections regardless of SLE activity. Combination of CRP plus NLR improves the specificity to 90% and PPV to 88%. Excluding the group with both infection and active disease, CRP plus NLR expands specificity to 95% and NPV to 90%. Conclusion In our experience, levels of CRP, particularly CRP plus NLR, were useful in differentiating patients with SLE from those with suspected non-viral infection regardless of the activity of the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of radioactive emanations has been of great importance for the performance of endourology procedures, such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (NLP). The damage to health caused by radiation has been a sensitive issue. The objective of this work was to determine the dose received by the surgeon during NLP and the total dose generated by the fluoroscope. A crosssectional study was conducted with data from a cohort study with a duration of 18 months that included 101 patients. Radiation was measured with dosimeter during the last 6 months. During the last 6 months of the study, 34 patients were submitted to surgery. The average age was 47 years. Average fluoroscopy time was 58.3 second (24-122 seconds) in both male and female groups, with 57.16 seconds and 58.95 seconds per case, respectively (P = .6). Radiation emitted during 6 months for the 34 patients was 330.5 mGy. The total radiation measured by the dosimeter was 1 mSv, which is equivalent to 0.3% of the total radiation applied during the procedures. Doses measured by the dosimeter on the surgeon were within the recommended annual doses although dose received by the hands exceeds the authorized limits (500 mSv/y). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]