Search

Purpose: Limited data are available regarding endovascular therapy of arteriosclerotic lesions of the deep femoral artery (DFA). In this study, we compare the outcomes of atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and open repair of DFA lesions., Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective registry of patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease Rutherford categories 2 to 5 treated by surgical profundaplasty (SP) or atherectomy followed by DCB for DFA lesions (symptomatic DFA). The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Overall mortality, target limb reinterventions, major amputation, and major adverse limb events (MALEs) were additionally analyzed., Results: A total of 373 patients treated for an arteriosclerotic lesion of the DFA between February 2015 and August 2021 were included, 301 treated by SP and 72 with atherectomy and DCB. The rates of chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) were 42.2% and 22.2% (p<0.002) for the surgical and endovascular groups, respectively. A previous DFA intervention was more frequent in the endovascular group (30.6% vs 15.3%; p<0.003). Patients who had an open repair were more likely to have an occlusion of the profunda (34.9% vs 19.7%, p=0.014), severe calcified lesions (26.5% vs 5.6%, p=0.001), and lesions longer than 20 mm (95.7% vs 88.7%, p=0.024). After propensity score matching, no significant differences were found with regard to technical and hemodynamic success. At 24 months, no difference was found in terms of freedom from CD-TLR (95.7% vs 96.8%), freedom from all-cause mortality (94.2% vs 98.5%), freedom from MALE (90.4% vs 93.9%), and amputation-free survival (93.8% vs 97%). Following endovascular therapy, length of stay was significantly lower (p<0.001) and any reintervention on the index limb was more frequent (p=0.039)., Conclusion: Patients with CLTI, occlusion of profunda, severe calcified lesions, and longer lesions are more frequently treated by open surgery, while reinterventions are more commonly treated by atherectomy and DCB. In patients with comparable clinical and lesion characteristics after matching, endovascular and surgical reconstruction of DFA lesions showed similar mid-term clinical outcomes. However, the risk of reintervention at the index limb is higher after endovascular treatment. Randomized studies are now warranted to compare both techniques in terms of medical and financial aspects., Clinical Impact: Atherectomy followed by DCB of symptomatic DFA is safe and effective. In patients with comparable clinical and lesion characteristics, outcomes are comparable with surgery. However, the risk of reintervention at the index limb is higher after endovascular treatment. Therefore, whenever possible an additional outflow vessel revascularization should be performed by the time of the primary intervention. Randomized studies are warranted to compare endovascular techniques and open surgery also under economic aspects., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Raphael Coscas received speaking fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic and BD. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Purpose: In situ fenestration of aortic endografts is an alternative endovascular technique for treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. While this technique has been carried out also to pass stent-grafts in individual cases, its feasibility and safety using different stent-grafts needs to be evaluated., Methods: In a saline bath at water temperature of 37°C, a 0.018" Astato 30 guidewire was advanced through 3 different stent-grafts (RelayPro, Zenith and Endurant II) by applying external current of 180 W via an electrosurgery pencil. Puncture efficacy and quality of the fenestration after ballooning with a 6 mm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) catheter were assessed. Then, balloon-expandable covered stents were deployed in the fenestrations and evaluated for stenosis, using microscopy and radiography., Results: Crossing of the electrified guidewire was instantaneous in the Zenith (n:10) and RelayPro (n:10) groups but not in 3 of 10 punctures in the Endurant group (p<.05). The fenestration area created after PTA was significantly larger in the RelayPro (5.3 mm 2 ± 1.8, interquartile range [IQR] 1.6) and Zenith group (6.7 mm 2 ± 0.7, IQR 0.5) compared to Endurant (2.3 mm 2 ± 0.4, IQR 0.5, p<.001). Fraying was observed in all groups while graft shredding was found in 8 cases after PTA of the Zenith and Endurant endografts and in 5 of the RelayPro group, but the difference was not significant. Vertical tearing was detected after RelayPro (2 out of 10) and Zenith (6 out of 10) fenestrations, no damage was found in the Endurant group (p<.01). Residual stenosis at the level of the fenestration after implantation of a 6 × 79 mm VBX stent had to be corrected in all Endurant cases with a high-pressure PTA catheter. No stenosis was found in the RelayPro and Zenith groups before and after flaring., Conclusions: The "electrified wire" technique is a feasible tool that can be used to perform in situ fenestration by perforation of the endograft fabric. Based on this experimental evaluation the "ideal graft" for this technique could not be identified. Long-term fatigue tests and comparison with other fenestration techniques are required., Clinical Impact: In situ endograft fenestration can be a useful technique in emergent aortic repair. Recently, the electrified wire technique has been proposed as alternative option to laser, radiofrequency and needle-based techniques. In comparison to these methods, the use of electrified wires can be performed without modifications of routine equipment. Additionally, the material costs can be substantially reduced. However, the effectiveness of this approach for fenestration of different prosthetic grafts is unknown. Based on our experimental studies, the electrified wire technique is feasible but the Endurant endograft requires more attempts, and the placement of a bridging stent should be completed with high-pressure balloons., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Patients with a hyperangulated (>60°) proximal aortic neck and at high risk of open surgery have been treated with endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). However, long-term outcomes are not well reported. The aim of this study is to compare the technical and clinical success of EVAR in angulated (45°-60°) and hyperangulated (>60°) proximal neck angulation., Materials and Methods: The data of all consecutive patients undergoing EVAR treated between November 2007 and February 2020 were collected. A retrospective analysis of this prospective database was performed. The primary measure outcome was technical and clinical success. In addition, we evaluated sack evolution, type IA endoleak, secondary procedures, aneurysm rupture, mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, and migration., Results: In all, 246 of 1353 EVAR patients presented with an angulation of the proximal neck >45°, 130 patients presented with an infrarenal angulation >60°, while 116 patients had an angulation between 45° and 60°. Patients with a hyperangulated infrarenal aortic neck were significantly more often women (8.6% vs 26.9%), older (73.9 vs 76.7 years), and had less often diabetes mellitus (20.7% vs 10.8%). Suprarenal neck angulation and reversed tapered neck were significantly more frequent in the hyperangulated group so that propensity scores were generated using these anatomical parameters to create a matched cohort group. No significant differences in technical (87.9% vs 94.8%) and clinical success (66.4% vs 69.8%) were observed. After a mean clinical follow-up of 58.9 months significantly more secondary procedures were performed in the hyperangulated group (23.3% vs 12.9% p=0.04); however, neck-related secondary procedures were comparable (1.7% vs 6.0%; p=0.09). Also, all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, sack evolution, type IA endoleak, aneurysm rupture, and migration were comparable for both groups., Conclusion: Compared with less angulated proximal aortic neck, hyperangulated neck anatomy did not reduce the technical and clinical success of EVAR but increased the risk of secondary procedures. In patients who are not good candidates for open surgery, EVAR is a reasonable alternative.

Purpose: We hypothesized that extending the proximal landing zone with the chimney technique could be beneficial in patients with a hyperangulated proximal aortic neck, defined as more > 60 degrees., Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of prospectively collected data of patients treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal aortic aneurysm with a hyperangulated proximal aortic neck. In all, 104 out of 130 patients were treated without (Group A) and 24 with the chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR, Group B). Primary outcome was technical and clinical success according to the reporting standards of the Society of Vascular Surgery., Results: The use of the chimney technique was associated with a significantly longer operation duration (167 vs. 93 min, p < .001), longer fluoroscopy time (44 vs.30 min, p = < .001), and larger amount of contrast medium used (149 vs. 127 ml, p = .03) but did not significantly improve technical (79.2% vs. 87.7%) and clinical success (54.2% vs. 68.9%). Aneurysm-related mortality was higher in group B (8.3% vs. = 0%, p < .001). Type IA endoleak was high in both groups at completion angiography (11.3% in Group A vs. 12.5% in Group B) and at follow-up (10.4% in Group A vs. 4.5% in Group B) without significant difference between the groups., Conclusions: Our data did not show a benefit of the primary use of the chimney technique in patients with a hyperangulated and short neck, although more studies are required to support this conclusion. Other strategies or new technologies are required for improving EVAR results in aneurysm patients with severe angulated proximal and short neck.

Purpose: Bridging stent stability is crucial for efficacy and safety of branched aortic endovascular repair (bEVAR) of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). In this study, we assess the performance of the new Viabahn Balloon-Expandable endoprosthesis (VBX) in bEVAR. Based on our learning curve we give recommendations for a safe and effective use of the device., Materials and Methods: We prospectively collected the data of patients with TAAAs undergoing bEVAR between December 2017 and December 2019. All patients with implantation of at least 1 VBX stent-graft as bridging stent were included in our single-center analysis. Demographic, comorbidity, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) data of 112 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Primary endpoint was a composite of branch-related technical success and freedom from target vessel instability. Secondary endpoints were clinical and ongoing clinical success., Results: Primary endpoint: technical success was achieved in all patients (100%) with a freedom from target vessel instability of 96.3% after a median follow-up of 18 months. Overall mortality was 13.4% (n=15) and 13 patients underwent secondary interventions, 12 of them are still alive and 1 suffered from aneurysm sac expansion, consequently an ongoing clinical success of 75.9% was reached. After modification of the implantation technique during the course of the study by selecting longer stent lengths after accurate estimation of vessel curvature and expected adaptation of the flexible endoskeleton to the specific anatomical conditions, no type Ic endoleaks were observed in the last 70 cases., Conclusions: The VBX stent-graft can be safely used as bridging stent for branched thoracoabdominal repair. However, learning curve should be considered to avoid type Ic endoleak and edge stenosis. Based on this experience longer landing zones and 2-step deployment of VBX are useful for successful bridging also of challenging target vessels.

Objective: To evaluate early and follow-up outcomes following bilateral use of iliac branch devices (IBD) for aortoiliac endografting and assess the impact of center volume. We used data from the pELVIS international multicentric registry., Methods: For the purpose of this study, only those patients receiving concomitant bilateral IBD implantation were analyzed. To assess the impact that procedural volume of bilateral IBD implantation could have on early and follow-up outcomes, participating institutions were classified as Site(s) A if they had performed >10 and/or >20% concomitant bilateral IBD procedure, otherwise they were classified as Site(s) B. Endpoints of the analysis included early (ie, 30-day) mortality and morbidity, as well as all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality during follow-up. Additional endpoints that were evaluated included IBD-related reinterventions, IBD occlusion or stenosis requiring reintervention (ie, loss of primary patency), and IBD-related type I endoleak., Results: Overall, 96 patients received bilateral IBD implantation (out of 910 procedures collected in the whole pELVIS cohort), of whom 65 were treated at Site A (ie, Group A) and 31 were treated at Site(s) B (ie, Group B). In total, only 1 death occurred within 30 days from bilateral IBD implantation, and 9 patients experienced at least 1 major complication without any significant difference between subjects in Group A versus those in Group B (10.8% vs 6.5%, p=0.714). In the overall cohort, the 2-year freedom from IBD-related type I endoleaks and IBD primary patency were 96% and 92%, respectively; no significant differences were seen in those rates between Group A or Group B (95% vs 100%, p=0.335; 93% vs 88%, p=0.470). Freedom from any IBD-related reinterventions was 83% at 2 years, with similar rates between study groups (85% vs 83%, p=0.904)., Conclusions: Within the pELVIS registry, concomitant bilateral IBD implantation is a safe and feasible technique for management of aortoiliac aneurysms in patients with suitable anatomy. Despite increased technical complexity, effectiveness of the repair is satisfactory with low rates of IBD-related adverse events at mid-term follow-up. Procedural volume does not seem to affect technical or clinical outcomes after bilateral use of IBD, which remains a favorable treatment option in selected patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Bridging stents undergo millions of cycles during respiratory movements of the kidneys throughout the patient's life. Thus, understanding the response of fabric and endoskeleton of the stent to cyclic loading over the time is crucial. In this study, we compare the fatigue resistance of the Viabahn Balloon-Expandable stent-graft (VBX) with the widely used Advanta V12/iCast under prolonged stress induction., Materials and Methods: A polyester test sheet with 10 fenestrations was used simulating a fenestrated endograft. Five 6×59 mm VBX stent-grafts and five 6×58 mm Advanta stent-grafts were implanted into 6×6 mm fenestrations. The stents were flared with a 10×20 mm PTA (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) catheter and connected with a fatigue stress machine. All stent-grafts were evaluated by microscopy and radiography at baseline and after regular intervals until 50,000,000 cycles were applied, simulating a life span of approximately 75 months. Freedom from fracture (FF), freedom from initial polytertafluoroethylene (PTFE) changes (FIC), and from PTFE breakpoint (FBP, all-layer defect) were calculated., Results: Digital radiographic images did not show any stent fracture in both groups after 50,000,000 cycles. The VBX stent-graft was free from any all-layer defects at the conclusion of 50,000,00 cycles resulting in a significant higher FBP compared with Advanta V12 (50,000,000 vs 33,400,000; p<0.01). All-layer defects were observed only in the Advanta group. Two of 5 Advanta stents showed early penetration of the nitinol ring causing a defect of PTFE. Regarding FIC, there was no significant difference between the stents (3,400,000 in VBX vs 3,200,000 in Advanta)., Conclusions: In fatigue tests simulating respiration movements, VBX and Advanta V12 performed equally well in terms of fracture resistance and freedom from initial PTFE changes. VBX maintained freedom from PTFE breakpoint throughout the full 50,000,000 cycles. All-layers defects were detected only in Advanta and were mainly caused by penetration of the nitinol ring through the PTFE.

Purpose: To evaluate the long-term results associated with the Zenith Alpha thoracic stent-graft, which was designed to address challenging access vessel anatomy., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 44 consecutive patients (mean age 72.5±8.3 years; 25 men) treated in a single center between August 2010 and October 2014 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years in survivors. The Zenith Alpha thoracic stent-graft was used to treat thoracic aortic aneurysms (n=37), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n=5), or penetrating aortic ulcer (n=2). Ten patients (23%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV, and 9 (20%) had nonelective procedures. Access vessel anatomy was demanding (mean minimum diameter 5.4 mm, tortuosity index 1.3). The primary endpoint at 5 years was ongoing clinical success (freedom from aneurysm-/procedure-related death, secondary intervention, type I or III endoleak, infection, thrombosis, aneurysm expansion, rupture, or conversion). Secondary endpoints were freedom from all-cause mortality, device migration, stent fractures, fabric erosions, endoleaks, neurological events, and access vessel complications., Results: The ongoing clinical success was 84% (37 of 44 patients) owing to 4 aneurysm-related deaths (9%), 3 type I or III endoleaks (1 in a deceased patient), and 1 aneurysm expansion without detectable endoleak. There were 3 access vessel complications (7%), and no postoperative neurological events. Migration was observed in 2 cases (5%). There were no stent fractures or fabric tears., Conclusion: Despite the alterations in stent-graft design and material to reduce profile, the Zenith Alpha thoracic stent-graft showed favorable long-term results even in multimorbid patients with demanding iliac anatomy.

Purpose: To report the outcomes from the observational SURPASS registry, which was created to assess the performance of the Conformable TAG (CTAG) stent-graft with the Active Control System (ACS) in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in a real-world setting. Materials and Methods: The SURPASS registry ( ClinicalTrials.gov ; identifier NCT03286400) was an observational, prospective, single-arm, post-market, international study that enrolled patients undergoing TEVAR using the CTAG with ACS for both acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease between October 2017 and July 2018. The CTAG with ACS features 2-stage deployment of the stent-graft and an optional angulation mechanism that modifies only the proximal end of the stent-graft. During the observation period, 127 patients (mean age 67.1±12.1 years, range 27-86; 92 men) were enrolled and treated for an array of aortic pathologies, including chronic and acute lesions and 4 ruptured descending thoracic aneurysms. The primary outcome of this study was technical success; secondary outcomes were clinical success and major adverse events at 30 days and 12 months. The numbers of 2-stage device deployments and applications of the angulation mechanism were recorded, along with the reasons for use. Results: Technical success of the TEVAR was 97.6% owing to unintentional partial coverage of supra-aortic branches in 3 cases (the vessels were patent on imaging). The stent-graft was repositioned at its intermediate diameter in 79 patients (62.2%), and the angulation feature was applied in 64 cases (50.4%), mainly to improve proximal wall apposition and orthogonality in the aorta. The desired effect was achieved in 60 cases (93.8%). There was no device compression, bird-beak configuration, fracture, or graft occlusion. The 30-day and 12-month clinical success rates were 97.6% and 92.9%, respectively. There were 3 aorta-related deaths at 30 days and a further 3 at 12 months. Fatalities were due to a retrograde type A dissection (0.8%), paraplegia, bowel ischemia, sepsis in the setting of a mycotic aneurysm, aneurysm rupture post aortoesophageal fistula, and multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Three endoleaks (2 type Ia and 1 type III) required reintervention. Conclusion: In the SURPASS registry, the use of the CTAG device with ACS showed promising outcomes despite the challenging pathologies. The new delivery system enables a controlled staged delivery with in situ adjustments during positioning, facilitating the treatment of complex aortic disease.

Purpose: To compare experimentally the biomechanical properties of the Viabahn Balloon-Expandable Stent Graft (VBX) with the widely used Advanta V12/iCast in the role of bridging stent-grafts for fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. Materials and Methods: Test sheets made of polyester having 2 rows of 5 fenestrations in 6-mm and 8-mm diameters were used to simulate a commercially made fenestrated aortic endograft. In total, 40 stent-grafts measuring 6×39 mm and 8×39 mm (10 of each size for each stent-graft) were implanted in fenestration sheets immersed in a 37°C water bath. After flaring, all stent-grafts were evaluated using microscopy and radiography. Biomechanical evaluation included pullout and the shear stress force testing; results are reported in Newtons (N) as the median (minimum-maximum). Results: After flaring, no damage or fracture to the stent-graft structures were detected. Pullout forces for the 6-mm stent-grafts were 27.1 N (20.0-28.9) for the VBX and 16.6 N (14.7-19.2) for the Advanta (p=0.008). Pullout forces for the 8-mm stent-grafts were 20.1 N (14.8-21.5) for the VBX and 15.8 N (12.4-17.5) for the Advanta (p=0.095). The shear stress forces necessary to dislocate the device at 150% stent diameter displacement was 12.5 N (VBX) vs 14.7 N (Advanta) for the 6-mm devices and 23.3 N (VBX) vs 20.2 N (Advanta) for the 8-mm stents (p>0.99 and p=0.222, respectively). Conclusion: In vitro tests simulating external pull and shear forces on bridging stent-grafts implanted in fenestrations showed that the VBX had resistance to dislocation equivalent to a well-known control device.

Purpose: To investigate 2 generations of balloon-expandable covered stents as potential bridging devices using an in vitro model of stent-graft fenestrations. Materials and Methods: Twenty BeGraft and 20 BeGraft+ cobalt-chromium stents covered in expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) in 6- and 8-mm diameters were tested in sheets mimicking stent-graft fenestrations. Microscopy and radiography were employed to evaluate stent morphology after flaring. In vitro bench tests measured maximum pullout (perpendicular displacement) and the shear stress (axial displacement) forces needed to dislocate the stents. Results: No alteration of ePTFE coverage was detected in the flared stents. Digital radiography and computed tomography showed marked alteration of the stent geometry, which was more pronounced in the BeGraft group. No fractures were detected. Median (minimum-maximum) pullout forces for the 6-mm stent-grafts were 17.1 N (15.8-19.6) for the BeGraft device and 30.4 N (20.2-31.9) for the BeGraft+ device (p=0.006). Median (minimum-maximum) pullout forces for the 8-mm stent-grafts were 11.3 N (11-12.1) for the BeGraft device and 21.8 N (18.2-25.5) for the BeGraft+ device (p<0.001). The shear stress test showed median forces of 10.5 vs 15.28 N at 150% of the stent diameter for the 6-mm BeGraft and BeGraft+ stent-grafts, respectively, and 15.23 vs 20.72 N at 150% stent diameter for the 8-mm models (p=0.016 and 0.017, respectively). Conclusion: Flaring changed the stent geometry but did not provoke stent fractures. The BeGraft+ is superior to the BeGraft in terms of pullout and shear stress forces, demonstrating greater resilience.

Purpose: To compare balloon-expandable covered stents (BECS) available for use as renal chimney grafts to the Advanta V12 approved for use with the Endurant endograft. Materials and Methods: A silicone model was manufactured based on preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of a patient with a 7-cm juxtarenal aneurysm treated with an Endurant bifurcated endograft and an Advanta V12 covered stent for the 6-mm-diameter right renal artery. The model was placed in a flow box filled with a 37°C blood-mimicking solution equipped with a pulsatile pumping system (140/60 mm Hg). The tested BECS were the Advanta V12, the VBX, and the BeGraft+. A 36-mm-diameter Endurant II endograft with a 16-mm-diameter contralateral limb and a 6×59-mm BECS chimney graft were used in 9 consecutive tests (3 for each combination). After each implantation, the model was placed in the CT scanner, and 2 radiologists blinded to the test device independently measured the gutter areas and the patent chimney graft lumen at the level of the Endurant's suprarenal stent, at the level of the chimney's maximum curvature, and 10 mm inside the renal artery. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess interreader reliability. Results: The mean gutter areas were 19.3±7, 20.2±8, and 22.3±8 mm 2 for the Advanta, VBX, and BeGraft+, respectively (all p>0.05). At the level of the aortic endograft's suprarenal stent struts, the mean diameter of the Advanta V12, VBX, and BeGraft+ were 4.46±0.3, 4.12±0.4, and 4.12±0.3 mm, respectively (all p>0.05). At the level of the maximum chimney graft angulation, the mean diameters were 3.77±0.3, 4.16±0.1, and 3.74±0.3 mm, respectively (all p>0.05). In the right renal artery, the mean diameters were 3.91±0.2, 4.05±0.9, and 4.3±0.4 mm, respectively (all p>0.05). The ICCs varied between 0.7 and 0.9, indicating good agreement between readers. Conclusion: These in vitro findings showed comparable results between the Advanta V12 and the available BECS used in conjunction with the Endurant endograft according to the instructions for use. Further clinical evaluation is needed to confirm these results.

Purpose: To evaluate chimney stent-graft position and morphological changes of the aneurysm sac as visualized by postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) over a minimum 24-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients (mean age 75.7±8.6 years; 20 men) with juxtarenal aortic aneurysms who underwent successful chimney endovascular aneurysm repair (ch-EVAR) with the Endurant stent-graft and had 2 postoperative CTAs separated by at least 24 months were included in the study. CTA-based measurements of aortic stent-graft migration, target vessel angle, and chimney angle were compared between the serial scans. Results: During a mean follow-up of 34.9 months (range 24-69.2), the mean migration of the aortic stent-grafts was under 5 mm (2.76±2.4 mm). The average migration distance per year was 1.15 mm. The aneurysm diameter reduced a mean 3.25 mm (p=0.048). The right renal artery angle moved significantly upward 6.72° (p=0.025), while the right renal chimney stent-graft moved significantly downward 7.83° (p=0.042). The left renal artery angle also moved upward 1.87° (p=0.388) and the corresponding chimney moved downward 5.68° (p=0.133). During the study period, no type I/III endoleak or chimney occlusion was observed. Conclusion: Midterm morphometric assessment of ch-EVAR using CTA showed significant aneurysm sac shrinkage and a stable 3-year position of the abdominal devices, with the mean downward migration of the aortic stent-graft being <5 mm in the majority of cases. The chimney grafts seem to be prone to take an oblique rather than parallel configuration during follow-up. However, there was no relevant clinical consequence related to this phenomenon.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and integrity of a new stent-graft as a potential bridging device in fenestrated stent-grafts using an in vitro fenestrated model., Materials and Methods: Polyester test sheets with ten 6-mm- or 8-mm-diameter fenestrations were used to simulate a fenestrated main body endoprosthesis. In total, 50 Viabahn balloon-expandable (VBX) stent-grafts of varying lengths (29 and 39 mm) and diameters (6, 7, and 8 mm) were implanted in the fitting fenestrations. After release, the 6- and 7-mm-diameter stent-grafts were flared with a 10×20-mm angioplasty balloon; a 12×20-mm balloon was used in the 8-mm-diameter devices. Safety of the devices was defined as absence of fractures detected on radiography or computed tomography (CT), as well as material failure detected by microscopy and water permeability testing. The forces (in Newtons, N) needed for perpendicular dislocation (pullout force) and axial dislocation (shear stress force) were also evaluated., Results: Forty VBX stent-grafts were subjected to digital radiographic imaging and multiplanar CT. None showed any stent fracture. Subsequent microscopy indicated no damage to the fabric or separation of the graft after flaring. Ten VBX stent-grafts underwent water permeability testing after flaring; no water passed through the graft wall during a 10-minute period under an intraluminal pressure at 120 mm Hg. Testing of 25 VBX stent-grafts revealed initial pullout forces between 11.3 and 31 N. Shear stress tests showed that the average force needed to dislocate the stent-grafts by 50% of their diameter ranged between 5.75 and 6.91 N (mean 6.1±0.5 N) for the 6-mm stents and between 3.31 and 5.4 N (mean 4.4±0.8) for the 8-mm stents., Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrated the applicability of the VBX as a bridging stent-graft in a simulated fenestration model. A comparison with other stent-grafts and clinical assessment are required.

Purpose: To assess safety and short-term efficacy of endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta with the new Zenith Alpha stent-graft., Methods: Between August 2010 and May 2014, 33 patients (21 men; mean age 73.2±9.0 years) were treated Zenith Alpha stent-graft (group ZA). Outcomes of this group were compared with those of 34 patients (25 men; mean age 70.3±8.5 years) treated contemporaneously with the Zenith TX-2 for the same pathologies (group TX). The primary outcome measure was technical success. Data on iliac tortuosity, minimum access vessel diameter, and previous unsuccessful treatment with other endografts was also recorded., Results: Technical success was 93.9% in group ZA and 91.2% in group TX (p=0.67). There was no case of surgical death or conversion to open repair in either group. Two (6%) type I endoleaks occurred in group ZA and 3 (9%) in group TX (p=0.67). Three patients died within 30 days in group ZA vs. none in group TX (p=0.07). Mean minimum access vessel diameter was significantly smaller (5.07 vs. 6.65 mm, p=0.002) and iliac tortuosity indices significantly higher in group ZA (1.34 vs. 1.25, p=0.02). Access vessel complications occurred in 1 (3%) patient in group ZA and 4 (12%) patients in group TX (p=0.17). Significantly more patients in group ZA (6, 18%) were unsuccessfully treated previously with other endografts vs. none in group TX (p=0.01)., Conclusion: The new Zenith Alpha appears to be equally as safe and efficacious as the Zenith TX-2 while being used in patients with demanding access vessel morphology., (© The Author(s) 2015.)

Purpose: To assess early and midterm outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with the Valiant Thoracic Stent Graft., Methods: Data were reviewed retrospectively for 92 patients (69 men; mean age 65+/-14.5 years) who underwent TEVAR in 52.2% elective and 47.8% urgent/emergent procedures for treatment of 56 degenerative aneurysms, 32 aortic dissections, and 4 traumatic injuries at 4 German centers between June 2005 and March 2008., Results: The technical success rate was 86.9%. Through 30 days, there were 3 (3.3%) deaths. Periprocedural complications included endoleak (n = 6), systemic complications (n = 6), arterial rupture or dissection (n = 6), device-related complications (n = 5), retrograde aortic dissection (n = 1), aortic rupture (n = 1), spinal cord ischemia (n = 1), and stroke (n = 1). Cumulative survival was 95.5% at 1 year, 87.4% at 2 years, and 76.4% at 3 years. The rate of aneurysm-related mortality was 2.2% (n = 2). For aneurysm and dissection patients, respectively, the rates of major complications were 9.3% and 15.6%, and secondary procedures were required in 7.4% and 12.5%. Type I endoleaks were detected in 4 aneurysm and 2 dissection patients, and graft migration occurred in 1 patient each from the aneurysm and dissection groups. No patients were converted to open surgery during follow-up. Aortic diameter reduction >5 mm was confirmed for 58.4% of patients overall., Conclusion: The high technical and clinical success, the low all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, the negligible rates of neurological complications and spinal cord ischemia, and the low incidence of endoleak support the safety and effectiveness of TEVAR with the Valiant Thoracic Stent Graft. However, some deployment-related complications could be avoided by enhancements of the deployment mechanism.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of totally percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in a large cohort of patients and to define risk factors for failure with a 10-F vascular closure system., Methods: A prospective study examined the feasibility and safety of percutaneous femoral artery closure with a single Prostar XL 10-F vascular closure device applied in conjunction with the preclose technique. Between January 2004 and December 2005, 535 consecutive patients were treated for aortic aneurysmal disease. Thirty-five patients were excluded, leaving 500 patients (417 men; mean age 72+/-6.6 years) treated for aortic aneurysms using the Talent or Zenith stent-graft delivered through sheaths measuring 14-F (191, 21.2%), 16-F (33, 3.7%), 18-F (179, 19.8%), 20-F (2, 0.2%), 22-F (228, 25.2%), and 24-F (271, 29.9%). Primary clinical success was defined as the freedom from additional early or late procedures to treat any complication at the access site. Data were analyzed to reveal any correlation of access site complications or early/late repairs to operator experience or risk factors (obesity, extensive femoral artery calcification, and previous interventions/scars in the groin)., Results: Primary success was achieved in 96.1% of all percutaneous approaches. Twenty-three patients developed early (n = 16) or late (n = 7) complications at the access vessel; in 12 cases, hemostasis was achieved using pledgets with the Prostar sutures. No wound complications were recorded. The need for early conversion to an open access correlated with CFA calcification (OR 74.5, 95% CI 17.8 to 310.7; p<0.001) and operator experience (OR 43.2, 95% CI 9.8 to 189.0; p<0.001). The risk of late access site repairs was significantly higher in the presence of a groin scar (OR 48.8, 95% CI 9.2 to 259.0; p<0.001). Correlation of sheath size with early conversion to open access was weaker compared to all the other factors (OR 1.2, CI 95% 1.0 to 1.4; p<0.05). Obesity was not a risk factor for any complication., Conclusion: Percutaneous EVAR using the Prostar XL is safe, with minimal early and late complications. Operator experience is one of the most significant predictors of success. Anterior wall calcification and severe fibrosis of the access vessel are also predictors of primary failure, whereas obesity and sheath size are not.